Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Review Transparency and Communication for New Molecular Entity New Drug Applications and Original Biologics License Applications in Prescription Drug User Fee Submissions, 52782-52784 [2022-18546]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
52782
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2022 / Notices
public disclosure. Comments will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Therefore, do not include any
information in your comment or
supporting materials that you consider
confidential or inappropriate for public
disclosure. If you include your name,
contact information, or other
information that identifies you in the
body of your comments, that
information will be on public display.
CDC will review all submissions and
may choose to redact, or withhold,
submissions containing private or
proprietary information such as Social
Security numbers, medical information,
inappropriate language, or duplicate/
near duplicate examples of a mass-mail
campaign. CDC will carefully consider
all comments submitted into the docket.
Written Public Comment: Written
comments must be received on or before
September 2, 2022.
Oral Public Comment: This meeting
will include time for members of the
public to make an oral comment. Oral
public comment will occur before any
scheduled votes including all votes
relevant to the ACIP’s Affordable Care
Act and Vaccines for Children Program
roles. Priority will be given to
individuals who submit a request to
make an oral public comment before the
meeting according to the procedures
below.
Procedure for Oral Public Comment:
All persons interested in making an oral
public comment during the September
1–2, 2022, ACIP meeting must submit a
request at https://www.cdc.gov/
vaccines/acip/meetings/ no later than
11:59 p.m. EDT, August 30, 2022,
according to the instructions provided.
If the number of persons requesting to
speak is greater than can be reasonably
accommodated during the scheduled
time, CDC will conduct a lottery to
determine the speakers for the
scheduled public comment session.
CDC staff will notify individuals by
email on August 31, 2022, regarding
their request to speak. To accommodate
the significant interest in participation
in the oral public comment session of
ACIP meetings, each speaker will be
limited to three minutes, and each
speaker may only speak once per
meeting.
The Director, Strategic Business
Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, has been
delegated the authority to sign Federal
Register notices pertaining to
announcements of meetings and other
committee management activities, for
both the Centers for Disease Control and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Aug 26, 2022
Jkt 256001
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit,
Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022–18734 Filed 8–25–22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2020–N–0026]
Issuance of Priority Review Voucher;
Rare Pediatric Disease Product
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2022–18519 Filed 8–26–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
issuance of a priority review voucher to
the sponsor of a rare pediatric disease
product application. The Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)
authorizes FDA to award priority review
vouchers to sponsors of approved rare
pediatric disease product applications
that meet certain criteria. FDA is
required to publish notice of the award
of the priority review voucher. FDA has
determined that ZYNTEGLO
(betibeglogene autotemcel),
manufactured by bluebird bio, Inc.,
meets the criteria for a priority review
voucher.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Myrna Hanna, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is
announcing the issuance of a priority
review voucher to the sponsor of an
approved rare pediatric disease product
application. Under section 529 of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff), FDA will
award priority review vouchers to
sponsors of approved rare pediatric
disease product applications that meet
certain criteria. FDA has determined
that ZYNTEGLO (betibeglogene
autotemcel), manufactured by bluebird
bio, Inc., meets the criteria for a priority
review voucher. ZYNTEGLO is
indicated for the treatment of adult and
pediatric patients with +-thalassemia
who require regular red blood cell
transfusions.
For further information about the Rare
Pediatric Disease Priority Review
Voucher Program and for a link to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Dated: August 22, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
full text of section 529 of the FD&C Act,
go to https://www.fda.gov/industry/
developing-products-rare-diseasesconditions/rare-pediatric-disease-rpddesignation-and-voucher-programs. For
further information about ZYNTEGLO,
go to the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research’s Approved Cellular and
Gene Therapy Products website at
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-bloodbiologics/cellular-gene-therapyproducts/approved-cellular-and-genetherapy-products.
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0093]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Review
Transparency and Communication for
New Molecular Entity New Drug
Applications and Original Biologics
License Applications in Prescription
Drug User Fee Submissions
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit written comments
(including recommendations) on the
collection of information by September
28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be submitted to https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function. The OMB
control number for this information
collection is 0910–0746. Also include
the FDA docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2022 / Notices
White Flint North, 10A–12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
20852, 301–796–5733, PRAStaff@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Review Transparency and
Communication for New Molecular
Entity New Drug Applications (NME
NDA) and Original Biologics License
Applications (BLAs) in Prescription
Drug User Fee Submissions
OMB Control Number 0910–0746—
Revision
This information collection supports
the evaluation of certain performance
goals and procedures set forth in what
is known as FDA’s ‘‘goals letter’’ or
‘‘commitment letter’’ under the seventh
authorization of the Prescription Drug
User Fee Act (PDUFA VII). The goals
letter is the result of Agency, industry,
and public input, as Congressionally
mandated under the applicable statutes.
The document entitled ‘‘PDUFA
Reauthorization Performance Goals and
Procedures Fiscal Years 2023 Through
2027’’ (PDUFA VII Commitment Letter)
represents current performance goals
agreed to by FDA in support of these
respective programs. The document is
available at: https://www.fda.gov/
media/151712/download.
To implement certain performance
goals, we established a review program
(the Program) to promote greater
transparency and increased
communication between the FDA
review team and the applicant on the
most innovative products that we
review. The Program goals are intended
to increase the efficiency and
effectiveness of the first review cycle
process and decrease the number of
review cycles necessary for approval so
that patients have timely access to safe,
effective, and high-quality new drugs
and biologics. A key aspect of the
extension of the Program is to conduct
an interim and final assessment that
will evaluate how well the parameters
of the Program have achieved the
intended goals.
Based on sponsors’ responses and
other data, on December 2, 2020, we
published an interim report that is
available on FDA’s website at https://
www.fda.gov/media/144130/download.
We learned that review teams have been
effective in enhancing transparency and
communication, with milestone
meetings also enhancing the
predictability of the review process. We
have also adapted certain good
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Aug 26, 2022
Jkt 256001
practices, including providing presubmission advice and templates;
allocating time for applicant-identified
discussion topics in late-cycle meetings
where feasible; and recommending
request response times of greater than 2
days for applicants with a global
presence.
We are revising the information
collection to continue the Program and
these assessments under the ‘‘PDUFA
VII Commitment Letter’’. The goals
letter includes the procedures, and
commitments that apply to aspects of
the human drug review program that are
important for facilitating timely access
to safe, effective, and innovative new
medicines for patients. Several of these
commitments aim to continue to
enhance communication between FDA
and sponsors during application review.
FDA and sponsors interact in a variety
of ways throughout application review.
One such way is via a communication,
called an information request (IR), sent
to an applicant as the discipline review
occurs. FDA uses IRs to request further
information or clarification that is
needed or would be helpful to allow
completion of the discipline review. IRs
may be in the form of letters, emails, or
Faxes.
FDA uses product quality IRs to
request further information or
clarification needed for FDA’s
assessment of identity, strength, quality,
purity, sterility/microbial controls, or
potency of drug substances or drug
products. Ensuring that patients can
have confidence in the safety and
effectiveness of their medications is a
longstanding priority for FDA. The
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
(CDER) and the Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER) have
worked to address this priority, in part,
by performing Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) and
Current Good Manufacturing Practice
(CGMP) reviews for CDER- and CBERregulated products. It is during these
reviews that CDER or CBER may issue
a product quality, or CMC, IR. IRs from
both CDER and CBER are expected to
follow Four-Part Harmony in which
reviewers are expected to communicate:
(1) what was provided, (2) what is the
issue or deficiency, (3) what is needed,
and (4) why it is needed. The PDUFA
VII Commitment Letter includes
commitments for FDA to update and
conduct training on existing policies
and procedures (Manual of Policies and
Procedures and Standard Operating
Procedures and Policies) based on the
four essential components.
FDA is committed to assessing current
practices of CDER, CBER, and sponsors
in communicating through product
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52783
quality IRs during application review
and effectiveness of Four-Part Harmony.
We will contract with an independent
third party to conduct assessments
intended to identify best practices and
areas of improvement in
communications between FDA review
staff and sponsors through product
quality IRs. To accomplish these goals,
the contractor will separately engage
both FDA staff and sponsors through
contractor-led interviews. Given the
volume of IRs and IR amendments,
these interviews will focus on a sample
of applications and their associated IRs.
The contractor may also choose to
leverage web-based surveys, in addition
to interviews, to accomplish the goals of
the assessment. The contractor will
anonymize and aggregate sponsor and
FDA responses before including them in
an assessment report, which is required
by the PDUFA VII Commitment Letter.
FDA will publish the report on FDA’s
website and in the Federal Register, for
public comment.
This assessment, utilizing information
collected through surveys and
interviews with FDA and original NDA
and BLA sponsors, will be of great
interest to FDA’s stakeholders,
including the regulated industry.
Equally important, the assessment will
be critical in helping FDA understand
sponsor perspectives on what is
working well, ongoing challenges and
pain points, lessons learned, and
opportunities for improvement.
Per the commitment letter, FDA will
select a contractor to design a sampling
method, in accordance with the
requirements in the statement of work,
for identifying applications to be
included in the assessment. The
contractor will also prepare a protocol
and script for scheduling and
conducting interviews with sponsors
associated with the sample applications.
If the contractor determines a survey to
be necessary, they will develop a webbased survey to deploy. The protocol
will ensure that the contractor
schedules and conducts interviews and
deploys any survey in a timely,
consistent manner using good interview
and survey practices. The interview
script will include open-ended
questions aimed at obtaining a thorough
understanding of applicants’
experiences and insights relevant to
product quality IRs associated with their
application under the Program. If
deployed, the survey would include
closed and/or open-ended questions
with the same purpose.
The contractor will analyze interview
(and survey, if deployed) responses to
identify challenges with Four-Part
Harmony and best practices for
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
52784
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2022 / Notices
communication via product quality IRs.
The contractor will also use the
interview (and survey, if deployed) data
to consider trends across IRs, compare
IRs before and after implementation of
Four-Part Harmony, and add context to
the contractor’s review of the sample
IRs, as well as any other data collected.
The contractor will synthesize and
interpret the results to develop a set of
findings and recommendations for the
Program to be included in a final
assessment report. In turn, FDA will use
the independent assessment findings
and recommendations to:
• determine the success of Four-Part
Harmony in improving communications
via product quality IRs;
• determine whether and how to
refine implementation of Four-Part
Harmony during the remainder of
PDUFA VII;
• demonstrate compliance with the
commitment to conduct the
independent assessments
• and publish them for public
comment; and
• share information about the
Program with the regulated community,
the public health community, Congress,
and the general public.
In the Federal Register of March 21,
2022 (87 FR 16006), we published a 60day notice requesting public comment
on the proposed collection of
information. No comments were
received; however, we have slightly
increased the estimate from our 60-day
notice to fully align with planned
program goals.
We estimate the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Surveys ..................................
Interviews ..............................
Total ...............................
1
120 (one to three per application).
120 (one to three per application).
...............................................
Total annual
responses
Average burden per
response
Total hours
1
120
0.25 (15 minutes) .................
30
1
120
1.5 .........................................
180
........................
........................
...............................................
210
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
We plan interviews with up to three
sponsor representatives per each
application in each interview under the
Program. Sponsors will participate in
interviews via teleconference. In
addition, if the contractor decides to
conduct a survey, sponsors will respond
to surveys (one survey response per
individual) by completing a fillable
form online. We estimate that 120
applicant representatives will expend
approximately 15 minutes to complete a
survey, for a total of 30 annual burden
hours. We further estimate that up to
120 applicant representatives (up to
three sponsor representatives for each of
up to 40 applications) will participate in
the interviews each year and that each
interview will last approximately 90
minutes, for a total of 180 burden hours.
There will be no recordkeeping or thirdparty disclosure burdens for this
information collection.
Dated: August 22, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022–18546 Filed 8–26–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Activity
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Aug 26, 2022
Jkt 256001
Food and Drug Administration
industry ‘‘Q2(R1) Validation of
Analytical Procedures: Text and
Methodology’’ published in November
2005.
[Docket No. FDA–2022–D–1503]
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical
Procedures and Q14 Analytical
Procedure Development; International
Council for Harmonisation; Draft
Guidances for Industry; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of two draft
guidances for industry entitled ‘‘Q2(R2)
Validation of Analytical Procedures’’
and ‘‘Q14 Analytical Procedure
Development.’’ These draft guidances
were prepared under the auspices of the
International Council for Harmonisation
of Technical Requirements for
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH),
formerly the International Conference
on Harmonisation. These draft
guidances harmonize scientific
approaches for analytical procedure
development and include validation of
a wider range of analytical techniques.
The draft guidances are intended to
facilitate regulatory evaluations and
facilitate potential flexibility in
postapproval change management of
analytical procedures. The draft Q2(R2)
guidance revises the ICH guidance for
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
You may submit comments
on any guidance at any time as follows:
ADDRESSES:
Electronic Submissions
Notice of availability.
SUMMARY:
Submit either electronic or
written comments on the draft guidance
by September 28, 2022 to ensure that
the Agency considers your comment on
this draft guidance before it begins work
on the final version of the guidance.
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 166 (Monday, August 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52782-52784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18546]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0093]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Review Transparency
and Communication for New Molecular Entity New Drug Applications and
Original Biologics License Applications in Prescription Drug User Fee
Submissions
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit written comments (including recommendations) on the
collection of information by September 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be submitted to https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under Review--Open for Public
Comments'' or by using the search function. The OMB control number for
this information collection is 0910-0746. Also include the FDA docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three
[[Page 52783]]
White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
20852, 301-796-5733, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Review Transparency and Communication for New Molecular Entity New Drug
Applications (NME NDA) and Original Biologics License Applications
(BLAs) in Prescription Drug User Fee Submissions
OMB Control Number 0910-0746--Revision
This information collection supports the evaluation of certain
performance goals and procedures set forth in what is known as FDA's
``goals letter'' or ``commitment letter'' under the seventh
authorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VII). The
goals letter is the result of Agency, industry, and public input, as
Congressionally mandated under the applicable statutes. The document
entitled ``PDUFA Reauthorization Performance Goals and Procedures
Fiscal Years 2023 Through 2027'' (PDUFA VII Commitment Letter)
represents current performance goals agreed to by FDA in support of
these respective programs. The document is available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/151712/download.
To implement certain performance goals, we established a review
program (the Program) to promote greater transparency and increased
communication between the FDA review team and the applicant on the most
innovative products that we review. The Program goals are intended to
increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the first review cycle
process and decrease the number of review cycles necessary for approval
so that patients have timely access to safe, effective, and high-
quality new drugs and biologics. A key aspect of the extension of the
Program is to conduct an interim and final assessment that will
evaluate how well the parameters of the Program have achieved the
intended goals.
Based on sponsors' responses and other data, on December 2, 2020,
we published an interim report that is available on FDA's website at
https://www.fda.gov/media/144130/download. We learned that review teams
have been effective in enhancing transparency and communication, with
milestone meetings also enhancing the predictability of the review
process. We have also adapted certain good practices, including
providing pre-submission advice and templates; allocating time for
applicant-identified discussion topics in late-cycle meetings where
feasible; and recommending request response times of greater than 2
days for applicants with a global presence.
We are revising the information collection to continue the Program
and these assessments under the ``PDUFA VII Commitment Letter''. The
goals letter includes the procedures, and commitments that apply to
aspects of the human drug review program that are important for
facilitating timely access to safe, effective, and innovative new
medicines for patients. Several of these commitments aim to continue to
enhance communication between FDA and sponsors during application
review. FDA and sponsors interact in a variety of ways throughout
application review. One such way is via a communication, called an
information request (IR), sent to an applicant as the discipline review
occurs. FDA uses IRs to request further information or clarification
that is needed or would be helpful to allow completion of the
discipline review. IRs may be in the form of letters, emails, or Faxes.
FDA uses product quality IRs to request further information or
clarification needed for FDA's assessment of identity, strength,
quality, purity, sterility/microbial controls, or potency of drug
substances or drug products. Ensuring that patients can have confidence
in the safety and effectiveness of their medications is a longstanding
priority for FDA. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) have worked
to address this priority, in part, by performing Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) and Current Good Manufacturing
Practice (CGMP) reviews for CDER- and CBER-regulated products. It is
during these reviews that CDER or CBER may issue a product quality, or
CMC, IR. IRs from both CDER and CBER are expected to follow Four-Part
Harmony in which reviewers are expected to communicate: (1) what was
provided, (2) what is the issue or deficiency, (3) what is needed, and
(4) why it is needed. The PDUFA VII Commitment Letter includes
commitments for FDA to update and conduct training on existing policies
and procedures (Manual of Policies and Procedures and Standard
Operating Procedures and Policies) based on the four essential
components.
FDA is committed to assessing current practices of CDER, CBER, and
sponsors in communicating through product quality IRs during
application review and effectiveness of Four-Part Harmony. We will
contract with an independent third party to conduct assessments
intended to identify best practices and areas of improvement in
communications between FDA review staff and sponsors through product
quality IRs. To accomplish these goals, the contractor will separately
engage both FDA staff and sponsors through contractor-led interviews.
Given the volume of IRs and IR amendments, these interviews will focus
on a sample of applications and their associated IRs. The contractor
may also choose to leverage web-based surveys, in addition to
interviews, to accomplish the goals of the assessment. The contractor
will anonymize and aggregate sponsor and FDA responses before including
them in an assessment report, which is required by the PDUFA VII
Commitment Letter. FDA will publish the report on FDA's website and in
the Federal Register, for public comment.
This assessment, utilizing information collected through surveys
and interviews with FDA and original NDA and BLA sponsors, will be of
great interest to FDA's stakeholders, including the regulated industry.
Equally important, the assessment will be critical in helping FDA
understand sponsor perspectives on what is working well, ongoing
challenges and pain points, lessons learned, and opportunities for
improvement.
Per the commitment letter, FDA will select a contractor to design a
sampling method, in accordance with the requirements in the statement
of work, for identifying applications to be included in the assessment.
The contractor will also prepare a protocol and script for scheduling
and conducting interviews with sponsors associated with the sample
applications. If the contractor determines a survey to be necessary,
they will develop a web-based survey to deploy. The protocol will
ensure that the contractor schedules and conducts interviews and
deploys any survey in a timely, consistent manner using good interview
and survey practices. The interview script will include open-ended
questions aimed at obtaining a thorough understanding of applicants'
experiences and insights relevant to product quality IRs associated
with their application under the Program. If deployed, the survey would
include closed and/or open-ended questions with the same purpose.
The contractor will analyze interview (and survey, if deployed)
responses to identify challenges with Four-Part Harmony and best
practices for
[[Page 52784]]
communication via product quality IRs. The contractor will also use the
interview (and survey, if deployed) data to consider trends across IRs,
compare IRs before and after implementation of Four-Part Harmony, and
add context to the contractor's review of the sample IRs, as well as
any other data collected. The contractor will synthesize and interpret
the results to develop a set of findings and recommendations for the
Program to be included in a final assessment report. In turn, FDA will
use the independent assessment findings and recommendations to:
determine the success of Four-Part Harmony in improving
communications via product quality IRs;
determine whether and how to refine implementation of
Four-Part Harmony during the remainder of PDUFA VII;
demonstrate compliance with the commitment to conduct the
independent assessments
and publish them for public comment; and
share information about the Program with the regulated
community, the public health community, Congress, and the general
public.
In the Federal Register of March 21, 2022 (87 FR 16006), we
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received; however, we have
slightly increased the estimate from our 60-day notice to fully align
with planned program goals.
We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Activity Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surveys...................... 120 (one to 1 120 0.25 (15 30
three per minutes).
application).
Interviews................... 120 (one to 1 120 1.5............ 180
three per
application).
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... ................ .............. .............. ............... 210
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
We plan interviews with up to three sponsor representatives per
each application in each interview under the Program. Sponsors will
participate in interviews via teleconference. In addition, if the
contractor decides to conduct a survey, sponsors will respond to
surveys (one survey response per individual) by completing a fillable
form online. We estimate that 120 applicant representatives will expend
approximately 15 minutes to complete a survey, for a total of 30 annual
burden hours. We further estimate that up to 120 applicant
representatives (up to three sponsor representatives for each of up to
40 applications) will participate in the interviews each year and that
each interview will last approximately 90 minutes, for a total of 180
burden hours. There will be no recordkeeping or third-party disclosure
burdens for this information collection.
Dated: August 22, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-18546 Filed 8-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P