Air Plan Approval; New Mexico; Interstate Transport Requirements for 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 52688-52690 [2022-18532]

Download as PDF 52688 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a safety zone encompassing a 1,000 foot radius of the Battleship Texas while it is under tow within the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Channel. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60a of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone during specified conditions: All navigable waters within a 1,000 foot radius of the deadship tow of the Battleship Texas while the vessel transits the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Channel. (b) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Houston-Galveston (COTP) or the COTP’s designated representative. (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP’s representative by 281–464–4780, or email at houstonwwm@uscg.mil. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. (3) Tug and barge traffic will be authorized to transit through the safety zone in the barge lanes, with no meeting or overtaking of other tug and barge traffic, with Vessel Traffic Service approval. (c) Enforcement period. The safety zone remains in effect from 6 a.m. until 9 p.m. on August 31, 2022, until the Battleship Texas is moored at the drydock facility on the Galveston Channel. Dated: August 22, 2022. J.E. Smith, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Houston-Galveston. [FR Doc. 2022–18578 Filed 8–26–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Harbours, Marine safety, Navigation, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. 40 CFR Part 52 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: Air Plan Approval; New Mexico; Interstate Transport Requirements for 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS AGENCY: 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES § 165.T08–0651 Safety Zone; Houston Ship Channel, Houston, TX. 2. Add § 165.T08–0651 to read as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Aug 26, 2022 Jkt 256001 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New Mexico, through the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), for the purpose of addressing the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’) ‘‘good neighbor’’ interstate SUMMARY: Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2. ■ [EPA–R06–OAR–2021–0772; FRL–9889–02– R6] PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 transport (prongs 1 and 2) infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Specifically, the EPA is approving New Mexico’s June 25, 2021, SIP revision that address prongs 1 and 2 to ensure that air emissions in the State do not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with the maintenance of the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS in any other state. The EPA is approving this action pursuant to section 110 and part D of the CAA and the EPA’s regulations. DATES: This final rule is effective on September 28, 2022. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action, Docket No. EPA– R06–OAR–2021–0772. All documents in the docket are listed on the https:// www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nevine Salem, EPA Region 6 Office, Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214– 665–7222, salem.nevine@epa.gov. Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID–19. Please call or email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to material indexed but not provided in the docket. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean the EPA. I. Background The EPA published a proposed rule for the approval of New Mexico’s, June 25, 2021, SIP submission to address the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS. The background for this action and rational for EPA’s proposed action are explained in the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) (87 FR 38362, June 28, 2022), and will not be restated here. No comment was received during the public comment period which ended on July 28, 2022. II. Final Action EPA is approving the New Mexico’s June 25, 2021, SIP submission as satisfying the requirements of CAA E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010 1hour NO2 NAAQS interstate transport prongs 1 and 2. New Mexico’s SIP submission includes provisions that ensure emissions from New Mexico will not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with the maintenance of the 2010 NO2 NAAQS in any other state. The EPA is approving this action pursuant to section 110 of the CAA. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES III. Environmental Justice Considerations Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) directs federal agencies to identify and address ‘‘disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects’’ of their actions on minority populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that ‘‘no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and policies.’’ 1 The EPA provided additional analysis of environmental justice associated with this action for the purpose of providing information to the public in our June 28, 2022 proposal (87 FR 38362). The EPA’s analysis shown in the proposed action demonstrates that there are no areas in New Mexico or nationwide that show problems attaining or maintaining air quality with regard to 2010 NO2 NAAQS. There is also no indication that NO2 emissions from New Mexico would contribute to environmental and health impacts on any group, including minority and low-income population. In addition, the national average of NO2 concentrations have decreased substantially over the years.2 We therefore believe that this rule will not have disproportionately high or adverse human health or environmental 1 https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/ learn-about-environmental-justice. 2 See https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/nitrogendioxide-trends. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Aug 26, 2022 Jkt 256001 effects on communities with environmental justice concerns. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 52689 not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a Start Printed Page 11875 copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 28, 2022. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and record keeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: August 23, 2022. Earthea Nance, Regional Administrator, Region 6. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 52690 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations Measures in the New Mexico SIP’’ is amended by adding the entry ‘‘Interstate Transport for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the table to read as follows: Subpart GG—New Mexico 2. In § 52.1620(e), the table titled ‘‘EPA-Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory ■ § 52.1620 * Identification of plan. * * (e) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE NEW MEXICO SIP Applicable geographic or nonattainment area Name of SIP provision State submittal/ effective date * * * * Interstate Transport for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS ... Statewide ..................... [FR Doc. 2022–18532 Filed 8–26–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0673; FRL–9878–02– R6] Air Plan Approval; AlbuquerqueBernalillo County, New Mexico; Excess Emissions Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision from the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) submitted on October 17, 2016, on behalf of the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board (Air Board). The submittal is in response to the EPA’s national SIP call on June 12, 2015, concerning excess emissions during periods of Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM). EPA is approving the SIP submittal and finds that the SIP revision corrects the substantial inadequacies identified in the June 12, 2015, SIP call. DATES: This rule is effective on September 28, 2022. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0673. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Aug 26, 2022 Jkt 256001 EPA approval date * 6/25/2021 * 8/29/2022, [Insert Federal Register citation]. copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alan Shar, Regional Haze and SO2 Section, EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75270, (214) 665–6691, Shar.alan@epa.gov. Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID–19. Please call or email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to material indexed but not provided in the docket. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA. I. Background The background for this action is discussed in detail in our June 13, 2022 (87 FR 35701) proposal. In that document, we proposed to approve the removal of Part 49 Excess Emissions from the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County provisions of the New Mexico SIP. We also proposed to determine that such SIP revision corrects the substantial inadequacies identified in the June 12, 2015 SIP call. II. Response to Comments The public comment period for our proposed approval and determination ended on July 13, 2022, and no adverse comments were received. We received one comment supporting the action and urged EPA to take action on a separate SIP submittal concerning 20.2.7 NMAC Excess Emissions of the New Mexico SIP. We acknowledge the support for our proposal and note that while 20.2.7 NMAC (Part 7 Excess Emissions) of the New Mexico SIP was not the subject of our June 13, 2022 (87 FR 35701) proposal, the EPA intends to fulfill its PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Explanation * obligations under the terms of a consent decree for taking action on the New Mexico SIP submittal concerning 20.2.7 NMAC.1 As no concerns were raised in public comment, we are finalizing our action as proposed. III. Final Action The EPA is approving a revision to the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County provisions of the New Mexico SIP submitted on October 17, 2016, in response to the EPA’s national SIP call of June 12, 2015, concerning excess emissions during periods of SSM. More specifically, we are approving the removal of Part 49 Excess Emissions from the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County provisions of the New Mexico SIP. We are approving these revisions in accordance with section 110 of the Act. EPA is also determining that the SIP revision corrects the inadequacies identified in the June 12, 2015 SIP call. IV. Environmental Justice Considerations Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) directs federal agencies to identify and address ‘‘disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects’’ of their actions on minority populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to 1 See Consent Decree resolving Sierra Club et al. v. Regan (Case No. 4:21–CV–6956–SBA, N.D. Calif.). E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 166 (Monday, August 29, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52688-52690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18532]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2021-0772; FRL-9889-02-R6]


Air Plan Approval; New Mexico; Interstate Transport Requirements 
for 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New 
Mexico, through the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), for the 
purpose of addressing the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') ``good 
neighbor'' interstate transport (prongs 1 and 2) infrastructure SIP 
requirements for the 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Specifically, the EPA is 
approving New Mexico's June 25, 2021, SIP revision that address prongs 
1 and 2 to ensure that air emissions in the State do not significantly 
contribute to nonattainment or interfere with the maintenance of the 
2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS in any other state. The EPA is 
approving this action pursuant to section 110 and part D of the CAA and 
the EPA's regulations.

DATES: This final rule is effective on September 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action, Docket No. 
EPA-R06-OAR-2021-0772. All documents in the docket are listed on the 
https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business 
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by 
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not 
placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy 
form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically 
through https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nevine Salem, EPA Region 6 Office, 
Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214-665-7222, [email protected]. 
Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, 
the EPA Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk 
of transmitting COVID-19. Please call or email the contact listed above 
if you need alternative access to material indexed but not provided in 
the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

I. Background

    The EPA published a proposed rule for the approval of New Mexico's, 
June 25, 2021, SIP submission to address the 2010 1-hour NO2 
NAAQS. The background for this action and rational for EPA's proposed 
action are explained in the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) (87 FR 
38362, June 28, 2022), and will not be restated here. No comment was 
received during the public comment period which ended on July 28, 2022.

II. Final Action

    EPA is approving the New Mexico's June 25, 2021, SIP submission as 
satisfying the requirements of CAA

[[Page 52689]]

section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS 
interstate transport prongs 1 and 2. New Mexico's SIP submission 
includes provisions that ensure emissions from New Mexico will not 
significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with the 
maintenance of the 2010 NO2 NAAQS in any other state. The 
EPA is approving this action pursuant to section 110 of the CAA.

III. Environmental Justice Considerations

    Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, 
Feb. 16, 1994) directs federal agencies to identify and address 
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental 
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income 
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. 
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and 
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, 
national origin, or income with respect to the development, 
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and 
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean 
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of 
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the 
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and 
commercial operations or programs and policies.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/learn-about-environmental-justice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA provided additional analysis of environmental justice 
associated with this action for the purpose of providing information to 
the public in our June 28, 2022 proposal (87 FR 38362). The EPA's 
analysis shown in the proposed action demonstrates that there are no 
areas in New Mexico or nationwide that show problems attaining or 
maintaining air quality with regard to 2010 NO2 NAAQS. There 
is also no indication that NO2 emissions from New Mexico 
would contribute to environmental and health impacts on any group, 
including minority and low-income population. In addition, the national 
average of NO2 concentrations have decreased substantially 
over the years.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/nitrogen-dioxide-trends.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We therefore believe that this rule will not have 
disproportionately high or adverse human health or environmental 
effects on communities with environmental justice concerns.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will 
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt 
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 
9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a Start Printed Page 
11875 copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report 
containing this action and other required information to the U.S. 
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General 
of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal 
Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is 
published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by October 28, 2022. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and record keeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: August 23, 2022.
Earthea Nance,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 
52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

[[Page 52690]]

Subpart GG--New Mexico

0
2. In Sec.  52.1620(e), the table titled ``EPA-Approved Nonregulatory 
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico SIP'' is 
amended by adding the entry ``Interstate Transport for the 2010 
NO2 NAAQS'' at the end of the table to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1620  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

            EPA-Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Applicable           State
      Name of SIP provision           geographic or       submittal/     EPA approval date       Explanation
                                    nonattainment area  effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Interstate Transport for the 2010  Statewide..........       6/25/2021  8/29/2022, [Insert   ...................
 NO2 NAAQS.                                                              Federal Register
                                                                         citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-18532 Filed 8-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.