Safety Zone, Saint Simons Sound, GA, 52335-52337 [2022-18290]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 164 / Thursday, August 25, 2022 / Rules and Regulations will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart Supplement. Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to Class D Surface Area. * * * ASO FL E4 * * Fort Pierce, FL [Removed] Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 19, 2022. Andreese C. Davis, Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. [FR Doc. 2022–18288 Filed 8–24–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100 [Docket No. USCG–2022–0697] Special Local Regulations; Marine Events Within the Captain of the Port Charleston Coast Guard, DHS. Notification of enforcement of regulation. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard will enforce a special local regulation for the Swim Around Charleston on September 18, 2022, to provide for the safety of life on navigable waterways during this event. Our regulation for marine events within the Captain of the Port Charleston identifies the regulated area for this event in Charleston, SC. During the enforcement periods, the operator of any vessel in the regulated area must comply with directions from the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.704 will be enforced for the location identified in Item 9 of Table 1 to § 100.704, from 9 a.m. through 3 p.m. on September 18, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this notification of enforcement, call or email Petty Officer Thomas Welker, Sector Charleston, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 843–740–3186, email Thomas.J.Welker@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce special local regulations in 33 CFR 100.704, Table 1 to § 100.704, Item 9, for the Swim Around Charleston regulated area from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. on September 18, 2022. This action is being taken to provide for khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Aug 24, 2022 Jkt 256001 the safety of life on navigable waterways during this event. Our regulation for marine events within the Captain of the Port Charleston, § 100.704, specifies the location of the regulated area for the Swim Around Charleston as a moving safety zone including all waters 50 yards in front of the lead safety vessel preceding the first race participants, 50 yards behind the safety vessel trailing the last race participants, and at all times extends 100 yards on either side of safety vessels. The Swim Around Charleston swimming race consists of a 12 mile course that starts at Remley’s Point on the Wando River in approximate position 32°48′49″ N, 79°54′27″ W, crosses the main shipping channel under the main span of the Ravenel Bridge, and finishes at the I– 526 bridge and boat landing on the Ashley River in approximate position 32°50′14″ N, 80°01′23″ W. During the enforcement periods, as reflected in § 100.704(c)(1), if you are the operator of a vessel in the regulated area you must comply with directions from the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. In addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners and marine information broadcasts. Dated: August 19, 2022. J.D. Cole, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston. [FR Doc. 2022–18289 Filed 8–24–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG–2022–0062] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone, Saint Simons Sound, GA Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is removing an existing temporary safety zone which was put in place in response to the grounding of the M/V GOLDEN RAY. Salvage operations pertaining to the M/ V GOLDEN RAY have concluded, therefore a safety zone is no longer required. SUMMARY: This rule is effective September 26, 2022. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022– 0062 in the search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’ ADDRESSES: If you have questions on this rule, call or email MSTC Ashley Schad, Marine Safety Unit Savannah Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard, 912–652–4188 extension 242, or email Ashley.M.Schad@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: I. Table of Abbreviations COTP Captain of the Port CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History On September 19, 2019, an emergency safety zone was put into place to protect vessels using the waterway from response and salvage operations pertaining to the capsizing of the M/V GOLDEN RAY. On January 25, 2022, the Unified Command in charge of the M/ V GOLDEN RAY response and salvage operations notified the Captain of the Port (COTP) Marine Safety Unit Savannah that salvage operations were concluded, therefore the safety zone in Saint Simons Sound is no longer required. On March 31, 2022, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled, ‘‘Safety Zone, Saint Simons Sound, GA 1’’ proposing to remove the regulation in 33 CFR 165.T07–0794, ‘‘Safety Zone M/ V Golden Ray; Saint Simons Sound.’’ During the comment period that ended May 2, 2022, we received 0 comments. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The COTPPort Savannah has determined that a safety zone previously established for the response to the M/V GOLDEN RAY incident is no longer required. IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule As noted above, we received no comments on the NPRM that published on March 31, 2022. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule. DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 52335 1 87 E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM FR 18753. 25AUR1 52336 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 164 / Thursday, August 25, 2022 / Rules and Regulations This rule dissestablishes the temporary safety zone in § 165.T07– 0794 which is located at 31°07′39.66 North, 081°24′10.58 West, between Saint Simons Lighthouse and the north end of Jekyll Island, in the vicinity of green buoy #19, near Saint Simons Sound, GA. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on waterway usage and the temporary nature of the previously established safety zone. While the temporary safety zone that we are removing was in place for more than two years, it was never intended to be permanent. There were many obstructions and hazards in the waterway, including the M/V GOLDEN RAY, other artificial obstructions that were used in its salvage, and the associated pollution prevention measures. These obstructions created a necessity for the temporary safety zone, but the obstructions have been removed, therefore there is no longer a need for the temporary safety zone. The temporary safety zone is now removed, and all waterway users regain unrestricted access to the waterway. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard received 00 comments from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Aug 24, 2022 Jkt 256001 rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule does not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator as full access to the waterway is reestablished and would not prevent any vessel from entering the previously established safety zone. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves removing a previously established temporary safety zone. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L(60b) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(b) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 164 / Thursday, August 25, 2022 / Rules and Regulations PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, Revision No. 01.2. § 165.T07–0794 ■ [Removed] 2. Remove § 165.T07–0794. Dated: August 16, 2022. K.A. Broyles, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Savannah, GA. Table of Contents I. Background II. Evaluation of Comments III. Final Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews [FR Doc. 2022–18290 Filed 8–24–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R02–OAR–2022–0450; FRL–9927–02– R2] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York; Oil and Natural Gas Control Measures Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the state of New York. The revision provides the State’s control measures for facilities within its borders subject to EPA’s 2016 Control Techniques Guideline (CTG) for the oil and natural gas industry. The intended effect of this action is to approve this item into the New York SIP and satisfy the requirement for the CTG. This action is being taken in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). SUMMARY: This final rule is effective on September 26, 2022. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID Number EPA–R02–OAR–2022–0450. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Aug 24, 2022 Jkt 256001 available electronically through https:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Omar Hammad, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007–1866, at (212) 637–3347, or by email at Hammad.Omar@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean EPA. 52337 response to the comment. The specific comment may be viewed under Docket ID Number EPA–R02–OAR–2022–0450 on the https://www.regulations.gov website. III. Final Action EPA is approving New York’s Part 200, ‘‘General Provisions,’’ section 200.9 amendment to Table 1 to add regulation 203–7.1(a) with a CFR citation of ‘‘40 CFR part 60, appendix A–7 (July 1, 2017).’’ EPA is also approving Part 203, ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector’’ control measure, with a State effective date of March 18, 2022, because it satisfies the 2016 Oil and Natural Gas Industry CTG. IV. Incorporation by Reference I. Background On March 21, 2022, New York submitted for approval a SIP revision to incorporate the adoption of Title 6 of the New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations (NYCRR) Part 200, ‘‘General Provisions,’’ and Part 203, ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector,’’ as adopted on January 18, 2022. Part 200, section 200.9, amends Table 1 to add regulation 203–7.1(a) with a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) citation of ‘‘40 CFR part 60, appendix A–7 (July 1, 2017).’’ Part 203 sets monitoring, operational, and reporting requirements for the oil and natural gas sector statewide. The adoption of Part 203 is meant to satisfy the requirements to implement EPA’s 2016 Oil and Natural Gas CTG within the 2008 and 2015 ozone nonattainment areas and statewide OTR requirements. On June 15, 2022 (87 FR 36096, June 15, 2022), the EPA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in which the EPA proposed to approve New York’s Part 200, ‘‘General Provisions,’’ section 200.9 amendment to Table 1 to add regulation 203–7.1(a) with a CFR citation of ‘‘40 CFR part 60, appendix A–7 (July 1, 2017).’’ EPA also proposed to approve Part 203, ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector’’ control measure because it satisfies the 2016 Oil and Natural Gas Industry CTG. In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, as discussed in section I of this preamble, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Title 6 of the NYCRR Part 203, ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector’’ of the New York Administrative Code that implements New York’s RACT regulations for the oil and gas CTG, including attendant revisions to 6 NYCRR Part 200, ‘‘General Provisions,’’ section 200.9, Table 1, ‘‘Referenced material.’’ The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 2 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.1 II. Evaluation of Comments In response to the EPA’s June 15, 2022, proposed rulemaking on New York’s SIP revision submittal, the EPA received one comment during the 30day public comment period. After reviewing the comment, EPA has determined that the comment is outside the scope of our proposed action or fails to identify any material issue necessitating a response. The comment does not raise issues germane to the EPA’s proposed action. For this reason, the EPA will not provide a specific Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 1 See E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). 25AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52335-52337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2022-0062]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone, Saint Simons Sound, GA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is removing an existing temporary safety zone 
which was put in place in response to the grounding of the M/V GOLDEN 
RAY. Salvage operations pertaining to the M/V GOLDEN RAY have 
concluded, therefore a safety zone is no longer required.

DATES: This rule is effective September 26, 2022.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2022-0062 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document 
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email MSTC Ashley Schad, Marine Safety Unit Savannah Office of 
Waterways Management, Coast Guard, 912-652-4188 extension 242, or email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On September 19, 2019, an emergency safety zone was put into place 
to protect vessels using the waterway from response and salvage 
operations pertaining to the capsizing of the M/V GOLDEN RAY. On 
January 25, 2022, the Unified Command in charge of the M/V GOLDEN RAY 
response and salvage operations notified the Captain of the Port (COTP) 
Marine Safety Unit Savannah that salvage operations were concluded, 
therefore the safety zone in Saint Simons Sound is no longer required. 
On March 31, 2022, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) titled, ``Safety Zone, Saint Simons Sound, GA \1\'' 
proposing to remove the regulation in 33 CFR 165.T07-0794, ``Safety 
Zone M/V Golden Ray; Saint Simons Sound.'' During the comment period 
that ended May 2, 2022, we received 0 comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 87 FR 18753.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 
70034. The COTPPort Savannah has determined that a safety zone 
previously established for the response to the M/V GOLDEN RAY incident 
is no longer required.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on the NPRM that published 
on March 31, 2022. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this 
rule from the proposed rule.

[[Page 52336]]

    This rule dissestablishes the temporary safety zone in Sec.  
165.T07-0794 which is located at 31[deg]07'39.66 North, 
081[deg]24'10.58 West, between Saint Simons Lighthouse and the north 
end of Jekyll Island, in the vicinity of green buoy #19, near Saint 
Simons Sound, GA.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this 
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on waterway usage and 
the temporary nature of the previously established safety zone. While 
the temporary safety zone that we are removing was in place for more 
than two years, it was never intended to be permanent. There were many 
obstructions and hazards in the waterway, including the M/V GOLDEN RAY, 
other artificial obstructions that were used in its salvage, and the 
associated pollution prevention measures. These obstructions created a 
necessity for the temporary safety zone, but the obstructions have been 
removed, therefore there is no longer a need for the temporary safety 
zone. The temporary safety zone is now removed, and all waterway users 
regain unrestricted access to the waterway.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received 00 comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    This rule does not have a significant economic impact on any vessel 
owner or operator as full access to the waterway is reestablished and 
would not prevent any vessel from entering the previously established 
safety zone.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and 
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of 
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves 
removing a previously established temporary safety zone. Normally such 
actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 
L(60b) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, 
Rev. 1. It is categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraph L60(b) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so 
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

[[Page 52337]]

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, 
Revision No. 01.2.


Sec.  165.T07-0794  [Removed]

0
2. Remove Sec.  165.T07-0794.

    Dated: August 16, 2022.
K.A. Broyles,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Savannah, GA.
[FR Doc. 2022-18290 Filed 8-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.