Notice of Intent To Prepare a Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, 51083-51086 [2022-17901]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 160 / Friday, August 19, 2022 / Notices
analysis, monitoring student
enrollment, calculating default rates,
monitoring program participants and
verifying student aid eligibility. This is
a request for an extension to the current
information collection 1845–0035 based
on a decrease in the number of
participants providing information to
the system.
Dated: August 15, 2022.
Kun Mullan,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2022–17845 Filed 8–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security
Administration
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Site-Wide
Environmental Impact Statement for
Continued Operation of the Los
Alamos National Laboratory
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), a
semi-autonomous agency within the
Department of Energy (DOE), announces
its intent to prepare a new Site-Wide
Environmental Impact Statement
(SWEIS) for the Los Alamos National
Laboratory (LANL or Laboratory) in Los
Alamos, New Mexico (DOE/EIS–0552)
in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA). The SWEIS will analyze the
potential environmental impacts of the
reasonable alternatives for continuing
operations of the Laboratory for
approximately the next 15 years. The
continued operation of the Laboratory is
critical to NNSA’s Stockpile
Stewardship Program to prevent the
spread and use of nuclear weapons
worldwide and to many other areas
impacting national security and global
stability. The SWEIS will also analyze
environmental impacts of legacy waste
remediation conducted by DOE’s Office
of Environmental Management (DOE–
EM). The purpose of this Notice is to
invite public participation in the
process and to encourage public
involvement on the scope of analysis
(e.g., range of alternatives, impacts, and
actions) and alternatives that should be
considered in the SWEIS. Following
completion of the SWEIS, NNSA will
decide which reasonable alternatives to
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
implement and will announce its
decisions through a Record of Decision
(ROD). Absent any new decisions
associated with this SWEIS process,
NNSA would continue to implement
decisions announced in previous RODs.
DATES: NNSA invites other federal
agencies, state and local governments,
federally recognized Indian tribes and
the public to comment on the scope of
the LANL SWEIS. The public scoping
period begins with the publication of
this Notice in the Federal Register and
continues until October 3, 2022 (the
Comment Period). NNSA will accept
public participation in written and oral
form, and comments concerning the
scope of the SWEIS will be given equal
weight regardless of method of delivery.
For receiving oral comments, NNSA
will host two virtual public scoping
meetings. The decision to hold only
virtual meetings is based on the
continuing high level of community
spread of COVID–19 in the areas where
in-person meetings would be held, as
measured and reported by the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. Meeting details will be
provided in a future notice posted on
the following website: www.energy.gov/
nnsa/nnsa-nepa-reading-room. NNSA
will hold the scoping meetings no
earlier than 15 days from the posting of
the notice. Details of the public
meetings will also be announced in
local media outlets.
ADDRESSES: Written comments will be
considered if received or postmarked by
the end of the Comment Period.
Comments received or postmarked after
the Comment Period will be considered
to the extent practicable. Written
comments on the scope of the SWEIS or
requests for information related to the
SWEIS should be sent via postal mail to
LANL SWEIS Comments, 3747 W Jemez
Road, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544
or by email to: LANLSWEIS@
nnsa.doe.gov. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personally identifiable
information in your comment, please be
advised that your entire comment—
including your personally identifiable
information—might be made publicly
available. If you wish for NNSA to
withhold your name and/or other
personally identifiable information,
please state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. You may
submit comments anonymously.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information about this Notice,
please contact Kristen Dors, NEPA
Compliance Officer, U.S. Department of
Energy, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Los Alamos Field
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51083
Office, 3747 W Jemez Road, Los Alamos,
New Mexico 87544; phone: (505) 667–
5491; or via email at LANLSWEIS@
nnsa.doe.gov. This Notice and related
NEPA documents are available at:
www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepareading-room.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Laboratory has been operating for
nearly 80 years in Northern New
Mexico. Today, the Laboratory is a
national security laboratory, as defined
by 50 United States Code (U.S.C.) 2471,
and operated as an NNSA facility by a
Management and Operating (M&O)
contractor with an annual budget of
approximately $4.6 billion and a
workforce of approximately 14,000
people. The Laboratory exists to support
NNSA missions, which are established
by law, including: (1) to enhance U.S.
national security through the military
application of nuclear energy; (2) to
maintain and enhance the safety,
reliability, and performance of the U.S.
nuclear weapons stockpile, including
the ability to design, produce, and test,
in order to meet national security
requirements; (3) to promote
international nuclear safety and
nonproliferation; (4) to reduce global
danger from weapons of mass
destruction; (5) to support U.S.
leadership in science and technology.
NNSA missions are carried out in a
manner that is consistent with the
principles of: (1) Protecting the
environment; (2) Safeguarding the safety
and health of the public and of the
workforce; (3) Ensuring the Security of
the nuclear weapons, nuclear material,
and classified information. As a
Federally Funded Research and
Development Center, the Laboratory is
primarily sponsored by NNSA but does
work for other federal agencies and
partners with a wide variety of entities.
LANL also has an important legacy
waste remediation mission, which is
overseen by DOE–EM. The potential
impacts of these ongoing DOE–EM
remediation activities will be included
in the LANL SWEIS. This Notice
signifies the fourth site-wide EIS
undertaken for the Laboratory since
1976.
Purpose and Need for Agency Action
The purpose of the continued
operation of the Laboratory has not
changed and continues to be to provide
support for NNSA’s core missions as
directed by the Congress and the
President. NNSA’s need to continue
operating the Laboratory is focused on
its obligation to ensure a safe and
reliable nuclear stockpile. For the
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
51084
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 160 / Friday, August 19, 2022 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
foreseeable future, NNSA, on behalf of
the U.S. Government, will need to
continue its nuclear weapons research
and development, surveillance,
computational analysis, components
manufacturing, and nonnuclear
aboveground experimentation.
Currently, many of these activities are
conducted solely at the Laboratory. A
curtailment or cessation of these
activities would run counter to national
security policy as established by the
Congress and the President. The
Laboratory plays vital roles in NNSA
missions including: enhancing U.S.
national security through the military
application of nuclear energy;
maintaining and enhancing the safety,
reliability, and effectiveness of the U.S.
nuclear weapons stockpile, including
the ability to design, produce, and test,
in order to meet national security
requirements; promoting international
nuclear safety and nonproliferation;
reducing global danger from weapons of
mass destruction; supporting U.S.
leadership in science and technology.
The 2016 Compliance Order on
Consent between the State of New
Mexico Environmental Department and
the Department of Energy (the Consent
Order) is the principal regulatory driver
for legacy waste cleanup at LANL. The
Consent Order contains requirements
for investigation and cleanup as well as
enforceable deadlines for achieving
desired remediation milestones, which
may include the submission of
documents such as investigation work
plans, investigation reports, periodic
monitoring reports, and corrective
measures evaluation reports.
Requirements To Fulfill DOE NEPA
Compliance
The SWEIS will be prepared pursuant
to NEPA (Title 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.),
the Council on Environmental Quality’s
NEPA regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–
1508) and the DOE NEPA implementing
procedures (10 CFR part 1021). The
DOE regulations (10 CFR 1021.330)
require preparation of site-wide
documents for certain large, multiplefacility sites, such as the Laboratory.
The purpose of a SWEIS is to provide
the public with an analysis of the
potential environmental impacts from
ongoing and reasonably foreseeable new
and modified operations and facilities,
and reasonable alternatives, to provide a
basis for site-wide decisionmaking and
to improve and coordinate agency plans,
functions, programs, and resource
utilization. The SWEIS provides an
overall NEPA baseline, so that the
environmental effects of proposed
future changes in programs and
activities can be compared to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
baseline. A SWEIS allows NNSA to
‘‘tier’’ its later project-specific NEPA
analyses at the same site. Tiering is a
method used in NEPA analysis that
allows agencies to eliminate repetitive
discussion of the same issues and to
focus on the specific issues in future
proposed actions.
The NEPA process enables federal,
state and local governments, federally
recognized Indian tribes, and public
participation in the environmental
review process.
Preliminary Alternatives
The scoping process is an opportunity
for the public to assist NNSA in
determining the alternatives, issues, or
analyses that should be included in the
SWEIS. NNSA welcomes specific
comments or suggestions on the content
of these alternatives or on other
alternatives that could be considered. A
preliminary set of alternatives and
issues for evaluation in the SWEIS is
identified below; during the
development of the SWEIS, NNSA
could include other reasonable
alternatives.
No-Action Alternative: Continue
Current Operations
The No-Action Alternative would
continue current operations throughout
the Laboratory that support currently
assigned missions. NEPA regulations
require analysis of the No-Action
Alternative to provide a benchmark for
comparison with environmental effects
of action alternatives. This alternative
includes the programs and activities for
which NEPA reviews and decisions
have been made, such as DOE–EM
legacy waste cleanup activities pursuant
to the 2016 Consent Order. The NoAction Alternative includes, for
currently assigned mission scope: (1)
construction of minor replacement
facilities; (2) upgrades to existing
facilities and infrastructure; (3)
decontamination, decommissioning,
and demolition (DD&D) projects.
Modernizing Current Operations
Alternative
The programmatic context for the
Modernizing Current Operations
Alternative is the continued support of
existing programs and activities by
modernizing facilities as necessary. This
alternative includes the scope of the NoAction Alternative, as described above,
plus additional modernization
activities. This alternative includes: (1)
construction of replacement facilities;
(2) more significant upgrades to existing
facilities and infrastructure; (3) more
significant DD&D projects. Under this
alternative, NNSA would replace
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
facilities that are approaching their end
of life, upgrade facilities to extend their
lifetimes, and improve work
environments to enable NNSA to meet
operational requirements. The proposed
DD&D of older facilities would
eliminate excess facilities and reduce
costs and risk. This alternative would
not expand capabilities and operations
at LANL beyond those that currently
exist.
Expanded Operations Alternative
The Expanded Operations Alternative
includes the modernization actions
included in the Modernizing Current
Operations Alternative, as described
above, plus actions that would expand
operations and missions to respond to
future national security challenges and
meet increasing requirements. This
alternative includes: (1) construction
and operation of new facilities, and (2)
significant upgrades to existing facilities
that result in changing the nature and
capabilities of these facilities. This
alternative would expand capabilities at
LANL beyond those that currently exist.
For example, under an Expanded
Operations Alternative NNSA may
consider the construction and operation
of an additional supercomputing
complex that would enable NNSA to
expand the capabilities of that program.
In the Draft SWEIS, NNSA will identify
and analyze other actions that could
expand the capabilities at LANL.
The Draft SWEIS will identify the
specific actions associated with the
alternatives and will assess the potential
impacts of implementing the
alternatives. The Draft SWEIS will also
identify and evaluate any actions related
to environmental management and land
transfer that are reasonable for each of
the alternatives.
Other Potential Reasonable Alternatives
The 1999 and 2008 LANL SWEISs
included a Reduced Operations
Alternative. Those SWEISs were
prepared at times when DOE/NNSA
deemed a reduction in Laboratory
operations to be a reasonable
alternative. For the foreseeable future,
NNSA does not consider reducing
operational or environmental
remediation missions at LANL as
reasonable. However, the timeframe for
the SWEIS analysis is approximately 15
years into the future, and NNSA
recognizes that requirements, needs,
opportunities, and vision may change
over such a long planning horizon.
Consequently, NNSA has not made a
final decision on whether to include a
Reduced Operations Alternative in this
SWEIS. NNSA welcomes input on this
and any other alternative the public
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 160 / Friday, August 19, 2022 / Notices
thinks are reasonable and should be
analyzed in the SWEIS.
Alternatives that NNSA will not
consider reasonable are (1) the complete
closure and DD&D of the Laboratory and
(2) transfer of current missions/
operations from the Laboratory to other
sites, as those actions would be
inconsistent with the LANL mission
defined by NNSA. Such possibilities
were considered as recently as 2008
when NNSA prepared the Complex
Transformation Supplemental
Programmatic EIS (CT SPEIS). In that
document, NNSA concluded that ‘‘as a
result of the continuing challenges of
certification [of nuclear weapons]
without underground nuclear testing,
the need for robust peer review, benefits
of intellectual diversity from competing
physics design laboratories, and
uncertainty over the details [of] future
stockpiles, NNSA does not consider it
reasonable to evaluate laboratory
consolidation [or elimination] at this
time.’’ That conclusion has not changed
today. In addition, as one of only three
NNSA national security laboratories,
LANL contributes significantly to the
core intellectual and technical
competencies of the U.S. related to
nuclear weapons. These competencies
embody more than 75 years of weapons
knowledge and experience. The
Laboratory performs the basic research,
design, system engineering,
development testing, reliability and
assessment, surveillance, and
certification of nuclear weapons safety,
reliability, and performance. From a
broader national security perspective,
the core intellectual and technical
competencies of the Laboratory help
provide the technical basis for the
pursuit of U.S. arms control and nuclear
nonproliferation objectives.
The CT SPEIS also considered and
evaluated the transfer of missions and
operations to and from the Laboratory,
and NNSA has implemented, as
appropriate, decisions that followed
preparation of that document. NNSA
has not identified any new proposals for
current missions/operations that are
reasonable for transfer to/from the
Laboratory.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Preliminary Environmental Analysis
The following issues have been
identified for analysis in the SWEIS.
The list is tentative and intended to
facilitate public comment on the scope
of the SWEIS. It is not intended to be
all inclusive, nor does it imply any
predetermination of potential impacts.
The NNSA specifically invites
suggestions for the addition or deletion
of items on this list.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
• Potential effects on the public and
workers from exposures to
radiological and hazardous materials
during normal operations,
construction, reasonably foreseeable
accidents (including from natural
phenomena hazards), and intentional
destructive acts
• Impacts on surface and groundwater,
floodplains and wetlands, and on
water use and quality
• Impacts on air quality from potential
releases of radiological and
nonradiological pollutants and
greenhouse gases
• Impacts to plants and animals and
their habitats, including species that
are federally or state-listed as
threatened or endangered, or of
special concern
• Impacts on physiography, topography,
geology, and soil characteristics
• Impacts to cultural resources, such as
those that are historic, prehistoric,
archaeological, scientific, or
paleontological
• Socioeconomic impacts to affected
communities
• Environmental justice impacts,
particularly whether or not activities
at the Laboratory have a
disproportionately high and adverse
effect on minority and/or low-income
populations
• Potential impacts on land use and
applicable plans and policies
• Impacts from traffic and
transportation of radiological and
hazardous materials and waste on and
off the Laboratory campus
• Pollution prevention and materials,
and waste management practices and
activities
• Impacts on visual aesthetics and noise
levels of Laboratory facilities on the
surrounding communities and
ambient environment
• Impacts to community services,
including fire protection, police
protection, schools, and solid waste
disposal to landfills
• Impacts from the use of utilities,
including water and electricity
consumption, fuel use, sewer
discharges, and resource conservation
• Impacts from site contamination and
remediation
• Unavoidable adverse impacts
• Environmental compliance and
inadvertent releases
• Short-term uses and long-term
productivity
• Irreversible and irretrievable
commitment of resources
• Cumulative effects of past, present,
and reasonably foreseeable future
actions
• Mitigation commitments
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51085
LANL SWEIS Process and Schedule
Fourteen years have passed since the
publication of the 2008 LANL SWEIS.
Because of comprehensive site planning
activities that are under consideration,
as well as other reasons, NNSA
determined that it was appropriate to
revisit the 2008 SWEIS analysis. The
scoping process is intended to involve
all interested agencies (federal, state,
and local), public interest groups,
federally recognized Indian tribes, local
businesses, and members of the general
public. Interested parties are invited to
participate in the SWEIS process to
refine the preliminary alternatives and
identify environmental issues that are
reasonable or pertinent for analysis.
Input from the scoping process will
assist NNSA in formulating the
alternatives and defining the scope of
the SWEIS analysis.
Following the scoping process
announced in this Notice, and after
consideration of comments received
during scoping, NNSA will prepare a
Draft SWEIS for the continued operation
of the Laboratory. NNSA expects to
issue the Draft SWEIS in 2023. NNSA
will announce the availability of the
Draft SWEIS in the Federal Register and
local media outlets. NNSA will hold one
or more public hearings for the Draft
SWEIS. Any comments received on the
Draft SWEIS will be considered and
addressed in the Final SWEIS. NNSA
could then issue a Record of Decision
no sooner than 30 days after publication
by the Environmental Protection Agency
of a Notice of Availability of the Final
SWEIS.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on August 15, 2022
by Jill Hruby, Under Secretary for
Nuclear Security and Administrator,
National Nuclear Security
Administration, pursuant to delegated
authority from the Secretary of Energy.
That document with the original
signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only,
and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register
Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in
electronic format for publication, as an
official document of the Department of
Energy. This administrative process in
no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
51086
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 160 / Friday, August 19, 2022 / Notices
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 16,
2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022–17901 Filed 8–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC22–103–000.
Applicants: Sonny Solar, LLC, PGR
2021 Lessee 13, LLC.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Sonny Solar, LLC,
et al.
Filed Date: 8/12/22.
Accession Number: 20220812–5217.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/2/22.
Docket Numbers: EC22–104–000.
Applicants: Allora Solar, LLC, PGR
2021 Lessee 19, LLC.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Allora Solar, LLC,
LLC, et al.
Filed Date: 8/12/22.
Accession Number: 20220812–5219.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/2/22.
Docket Numbers: EC22–105–000.
Applicants: Gunsight Solar, LLC, PGR
2021 Lessee 15, LLC.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Gunsight Solar,
LLC, et al.
Filed Date: 8/12/22.
Accession Number: 20220812–5222.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/2/22.
Docket Numbers: EC22–106–000.
Applicants: Cabin Creek Solar, LLC,
PGR 2021 Lessee 12, LLC.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Cabin Creek Solar,
LLC, et al.
Filed Date: 8/12/22.
Accession Number: 20220812–5224.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/2/22.
Docket Numbers: EC22–107–000.
Applicants: Bulldog Solar, LLC, PGR
2021 Lessee 9, LLC.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Bulldog Solar,
LLC, et al.
Filed Date: 8/12/22.
Accession Number: 20220812–5227.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/2/22.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
Docket Numbers: EC22–108–000.
Applicants: Northern States Power
Company, a Minnesota Corporation,
Northern Wind Energy Redevelopment,
LLC.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Northern States
Power Company, et al.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5113.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Docket Numbers: EC22–109–000.
Applicants: Northern States Power
Company, a Minnesota Corporation,
Rock Aetna Power Partners, LLC.
Description: Joint Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Northern States
Power Company, a Minnesota
Corporation, et al.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5124.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER21–2455–003.
Applicants: California Independent
System Operator Corporation.
Description: Compliance filing: 2022–
08–15 Compliance Filing—FERC Order
No. 2222 to be effective 6/16/2022.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5078.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Docket Numbers: ER22–2494–000.
Applicants: FirstEnergy Service
Company.
Description: FirstEnergy Service
Company Submits Request for Limited
Waiver of Affiliate Rules.
Filed Date: 7/25/22.
Accession Number: 20220725–5180.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.
Docket Numbers: ER22–2656–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Original ISA/ICSA Nos. 6555 and 6556;
Queue No. AC1–086 to be effective 7/
14/2022.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5036.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Docket Numbers: ER22–2657–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: Cost
Responsibility Agreement, SA No. 6557;
Non-Queue No. NQ–173 to be effective
7/19/2022.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5080.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Docket Numbers: ER22–2659–000.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
2022–08–15_SA 2927 Duke EnergyDuke Energy 2nd Rev GIA (J453 J1189)
to be effective 8/5/2022.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5131.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Docket Numbers: ER22–2660–000.
Applicants: Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: SPS
Formula Rate Revisions to Incorporate
Changes Accepted in ER22–201 to be
effective 5/19/2021.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5151.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Docket Numbers: ER22–2661–000.
Applicants: California Independent
System Operator Corporation
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
2022–08–15 Flexible Ramping Product
Enhancements to be effective 12/31/
9998.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5159.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Docket Numbers: ER22–2662–000.
Applicants: Aron Energy Prepay 14
LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Market-Based Rate Application to be
effective 10/15/2022.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5167.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following qualifying
facility filings:
Docket Numbers: QF22–854–000.
Applicants: Radford University.
Description: Form 556 of Radford
University.
Filed Date: 8/15/22.
Accession Number: 20220815–5033.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/6/22.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system (https://
elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/
fercgensearch.asp) by querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 160 (Friday, August 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51083-51086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17901]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security Administration
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Site-Wide Environmental Impact
Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-
autonomous agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), announces its
intent to prepare a new Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement
(SWEIS) for the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or Laboratory) in
Los Alamos, New Mexico (DOE/EIS-0552) in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The SWEIS will analyze the
potential environmental impacts of the reasonable alternatives for
continuing operations of the Laboratory for approximately the next 15
years. The continued operation of the Laboratory is critical to NNSA's
Stockpile Stewardship Program to prevent the spread and use of nuclear
weapons worldwide and to many other areas impacting national security
and global stability. The SWEIS will also analyze environmental impacts
of legacy waste remediation conducted by DOE's Office of Environmental
Management (DOE-EM). The purpose of this Notice is to invite public
participation in the process and to encourage public involvement on the
scope of analysis (e.g., range of alternatives, impacts, and actions)
and alternatives that should be considered in the SWEIS. Following
completion of the SWEIS, NNSA will decide which reasonable alternatives
to implement and will announce its decisions through a Record of
Decision (ROD). Absent any new decisions associated with this SWEIS
process, NNSA would continue to implement decisions announced in
previous RODs.
DATES: NNSA invites other federal agencies, state and local
governments, federally recognized Indian tribes and the public to
comment on the scope of the LANL SWEIS. The public scoping period
begins with the publication of this Notice in the Federal Register and
continues until October 3, 2022 (the Comment Period). NNSA will accept
public participation in written and oral form, and comments concerning
the scope of the SWEIS will be given equal weight regardless of method
of delivery. For receiving oral comments, NNSA will host two virtual
public scoping meetings. The decision to hold only virtual meetings is
based on the continuing high level of community spread of COVID-19 in
the areas where in-person meetings would be held, as measured and
reported by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Meeting details will be provided in a future notice posted on the
following website: www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepa-reading-room. NNSA
will hold the scoping meetings no earlier than 15 days from the posting
of the notice. Details of the public meetings will also be announced in
local media outlets.
ADDRESSES: Written comments will be considered if received or
postmarked by the end of the Comment Period. Comments received or
postmarked after the Comment Period will be considered to the extent
practicable. Written comments on the scope of the SWEIS or requests for
information related to the SWEIS should be sent via postal mail to LANL
SWEIS Comments, 3747 W Jemez Road, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 or by
email to: [email protected]. Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other personally identifiable information in
your comment, please be advised that your entire comment--including
your personally identifiable information--might be made publicly
available. If you wish for NNSA to withhold your name and/or other
personally identifiable information, please state this prominently at
the beginning of your comment. You may submit comments anonymously.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about this
Notice, please contact Kristen Dors, NEPA Compliance Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Los
Alamos Field Office, 3747 W Jemez Road, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544;
phone: (505) 667-5491; or via email at [email protected]. This
Notice and related NEPA documents are available at: www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepa-reading-room.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Laboratory has been operating for nearly 80 years in Northern
New Mexico. Today, the Laboratory is a national security laboratory, as
defined by 50 United States Code (U.S.C.) 2471, and operated as an NNSA
facility by a Management and Operating (M&O) contractor with an annual
budget of approximately $4.6 billion and a workforce of approximately
14,000 people. The Laboratory exists to support NNSA missions, which
are established by law, including: (1) to enhance U.S. national
security through the military application of nuclear energy; (2) to
maintain and enhance the safety, reliability, and performance of the
U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile, including the ability to design,
produce, and test, in order to meet national security requirements; (3)
to promote international nuclear safety and nonproliferation; (4) to
reduce global danger from weapons of mass destruction; (5) to support
U.S. leadership in science and technology. NNSA missions are carried
out in a manner that is consistent with the principles of: (1)
Protecting the environment; (2) Safeguarding the safety and health of
the public and of the workforce; (3) Ensuring the Security of the
nuclear weapons, nuclear material, and classified information. As a
Federally Funded Research and Development Center, the Laboratory is
primarily sponsored by NNSA but does work for other federal agencies
and partners with a wide variety of entities. LANL also has an
important legacy waste remediation mission, which is overseen by DOE-
EM. The potential impacts of these ongoing DOE-EM remediation
activities will be included in the LANL SWEIS. This Notice signifies
the fourth site-wide EIS undertaken for the Laboratory since 1976.
Purpose and Need for Agency Action
The purpose of the continued operation of the Laboratory has not
changed and continues to be to provide support for NNSA's core missions
as directed by the Congress and the President. NNSA's need to continue
operating the Laboratory is focused on its obligation to ensure a safe
and reliable nuclear stockpile. For the
[[Page 51084]]
foreseeable future, NNSA, on behalf of the U.S. Government, will need
to continue its nuclear weapons research and development, surveillance,
computational analysis, components manufacturing, and nonnuclear
aboveground experimentation. Currently, many of these activities are
conducted solely at the Laboratory. A curtailment or cessation of these
activities would run counter to national security policy as established
by the Congress and the President. The Laboratory plays vital roles in
NNSA missions including: enhancing U.S. national security through the
military application of nuclear energy; maintaining and enhancing the
safety, reliability, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear weapons
stockpile, including the ability to design, produce, and test, in order
to meet national security requirements; promoting international nuclear
safety and nonproliferation; reducing global danger from weapons of
mass destruction; supporting U.S. leadership in science and technology.
The 2016 Compliance Order on Consent between the State of New
Mexico Environmental Department and the Department of Energy (the
Consent Order) is the principal regulatory driver for legacy waste
cleanup at LANL. The Consent Order contains requirements for
investigation and cleanup as well as enforceable deadlines for
achieving desired remediation milestones, which may include the
submission of documents such as investigation work plans, investigation
reports, periodic monitoring reports, and corrective measures
evaluation reports.
Requirements To Fulfill DOE NEPA Compliance
The SWEIS will be prepared pursuant to NEPA (Title 42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA regulations (40
CFR parts 1500-1508) and the DOE NEPA implementing procedures (10 CFR
part 1021). The DOE regulations (10 CFR 1021.330) require preparation
of site-wide documents for certain large, multiple-facility sites, such
as the Laboratory. The purpose of a SWEIS is to provide the public with
an analysis of the potential environmental impacts from ongoing and
reasonably foreseeable new and modified operations and facilities, and
reasonable alternatives, to provide a basis for site-wide
decisionmaking and to improve and coordinate agency plans, functions,
programs, and resource utilization. The SWEIS provides an overall NEPA
baseline, so that the environmental effects of proposed future changes
in programs and activities can be compared to the baseline. A SWEIS
allows NNSA to ``tier'' its later project-specific NEPA analyses at the
same site. Tiering is a method used in NEPA analysis that allows
agencies to eliminate repetitive discussion of the same issues and to
focus on the specific issues in future proposed actions.
The NEPA process enables federal, state and local governments,
federally recognized Indian tribes, and public participation in the
environmental review process.
Preliminary Alternatives
The scoping process is an opportunity for the public to assist NNSA
in determining the alternatives, issues, or analyses that should be
included in the SWEIS. NNSA welcomes specific comments or suggestions
on the content of these alternatives or on other alternatives that
could be considered. A preliminary set of alternatives and issues for
evaluation in the SWEIS is identified below; during the development of
the SWEIS, NNSA could include other reasonable alternatives.
No-Action Alternative: Continue Current Operations
The No-Action Alternative would continue current operations
throughout the Laboratory that support currently assigned missions.
NEPA regulations require analysis of the No-Action Alternative to
provide a benchmark for comparison with environmental effects of action
alternatives. This alternative includes the programs and activities for
which NEPA reviews and decisions have been made, such as DOE-EM legacy
waste cleanup activities pursuant to the 2016 Consent Order. The No-
Action Alternative includes, for currently assigned mission scope: (1)
construction of minor replacement facilities; (2) upgrades to existing
facilities and infrastructure; (3) decontamination, decommissioning,
and demolition (DD&D) projects.
Modernizing Current Operations Alternative
The programmatic context for the Modernizing Current Operations
Alternative is the continued support of existing programs and
activities by modernizing facilities as necessary. This alternative
includes the scope of the No-Action Alternative, as described above,
plus additional modernization activities. This alternative includes:
(1) construction of replacement facilities; (2) more significant
upgrades to existing facilities and infrastructure; (3) more
significant DD&D projects. Under this alternative, NNSA would replace
facilities that are approaching their end of life, upgrade facilities
to extend their lifetimes, and improve work environments to enable NNSA
to meet operational requirements. The proposed DD&D of older facilities
would eliminate excess facilities and reduce costs and risk. This
alternative would not expand capabilities and operations at LANL beyond
those that currently exist.
Expanded Operations Alternative
The Expanded Operations Alternative includes the modernization
actions included in the Modernizing Current Operations Alternative, as
described above, plus actions that would expand operations and missions
to respond to future national security challenges and meet increasing
requirements. This alternative includes: (1) construction and operation
of new facilities, and (2) significant upgrades to existing facilities
that result in changing the nature and capabilities of these
facilities. This alternative would expand capabilities at LANL beyond
those that currently exist. For example, under an Expanded Operations
Alternative NNSA may consider the construction and operation of an
additional supercomputing complex that would enable NNSA to expand the
capabilities of that program. In the Draft SWEIS, NNSA will identify
and analyze other actions that could expand the capabilities at LANL.
The Draft SWEIS will identify the specific actions associated with
the alternatives and will assess the potential impacts of implementing
the alternatives. The Draft SWEIS will also identify and evaluate any
actions related to environmental management and land transfer that are
reasonable for each of the alternatives.
Other Potential Reasonable Alternatives
The 1999 and 2008 LANL SWEISs included a Reduced Operations
Alternative. Those SWEISs were prepared at times when DOE/NNSA deemed a
reduction in Laboratory operations to be a reasonable alternative. For
the foreseeable future, NNSA does not consider reducing operational or
environmental remediation missions at LANL as reasonable. However, the
timeframe for the SWEIS analysis is approximately 15 years into the
future, and NNSA recognizes that requirements, needs, opportunities,
and vision may change over such a long planning horizon. Consequently,
NNSA has not made a final decision on whether to include a Reduced
Operations Alternative in this SWEIS. NNSA welcomes input on this and
any other alternative the public
[[Page 51085]]
thinks are reasonable and should be analyzed in the SWEIS.
Alternatives that NNSA will not consider reasonable are (1) the
complete closure and DD&D of the Laboratory and (2) transfer of current
missions/operations from the Laboratory to other sites, as those
actions would be inconsistent with the LANL mission defined by NNSA.
Such possibilities were considered as recently as 2008 when NNSA
prepared the Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic EIS (CT
SPEIS). In that document, NNSA concluded that ``as a result of the
continuing challenges of certification [of nuclear weapons] without
underground nuclear testing, the need for robust peer review, benefits
of intellectual diversity from competing physics design laboratories,
and uncertainty over the details [of] future stockpiles, NNSA does not
consider it reasonable to evaluate laboratory consolidation [or
elimination] at this time.'' That conclusion has not changed today. In
addition, as one of only three NNSA national security laboratories,
LANL contributes significantly to the core intellectual and technical
competencies of the U.S. related to nuclear weapons. These competencies
embody more than 75 years of weapons knowledge and experience. The
Laboratory performs the basic research, design, system engineering,
development testing, reliability and assessment, surveillance, and
certification of nuclear weapons safety, reliability, and performance.
From a broader national security perspective, the core intellectual and
technical competencies of the Laboratory help provide the technical
basis for the pursuit of U.S. arms control and nuclear nonproliferation
objectives.
The CT SPEIS also considered and evaluated the transfer of missions
and operations to and from the Laboratory, and NNSA has implemented, as
appropriate, decisions that followed preparation of that document. NNSA
has not identified any new proposals for current missions/operations
that are reasonable for transfer to/from the Laboratory.
Preliminary Environmental Analysis
The following issues have been identified for analysis in the
SWEIS. The list is tentative and intended to facilitate public comment
on the scope of the SWEIS. It is not intended to be all inclusive, nor
does it imply any predetermination of potential impacts. The NNSA
specifically invites suggestions for the addition or deletion of items
on this list.
Potential effects on the public and workers from exposures to
radiological and hazardous materials during normal operations,
construction, reasonably foreseeable accidents (including from natural
phenomena hazards), and intentional destructive acts
Impacts on surface and groundwater, floodplains and wetlands,
and on water use and quality
Impacts on air quality from potential releases of radiological
and nonradiological pollutants and greenhouse gases
Impacts to plants and animals and their habitats, including
species that are federally or state-listed as threatened or endangered,
or of special concern
Impacts on physiography, topography, geology, and soil
characteristics
Impacts to cultural resources, such as those that are
historic, prehistoric, archaeological, scientific, or paleontological
Socioeconomic impacts to affected communities
Environmental justice impacts, particularly whether or not
activities at the Laboratory have a disproportionately high and adverse
effect on minority and/or low-income populations
Potential impacts on land use and applicable plans and
policies
Impacts from traffic and transportation of radiological and
hazardous materials and waste on and off the Laboratory campus
Pollution prevention and materials, and waste management
practices and activities
Impacts on visual aesthetics and noise levels of Laboratory
facilities on the surrounding communities and ambient environment
Impacts to community services, including fire protection,
police protection, schools, and solid waste disposal to landfills
Impacts from the use of utilities, including water and
electricity consumption, fuel use, sewer discharges, and resource
conservation
Impacts from site contamination and remediation
Unavoidable adverse impacts
Environmental compliance and inadvertent releases
Short-term uses and long-term productivity
Irreversible and irretrievable commitment of resources
Cumulative effects of past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future actions
Mitigation commitments
LANL SWEIS Process and Schedule
Fourteen years have passed since the publication of the 2008 LANL
SWEIS. Because of comprehensive site planning activities that are under
consideration, as well as other reasons, NNSA determined that it was
appropriate to revisit the 2008 SWEIS analysis. The scoping process is
intended to involve all interested agencies (federal, state, and
local), public interest groups, federally recognized Indian tribes,
local businesses, and members of the general public. Interested parties
are invited to participate in the SWEIS process to refine the
preliminary alternatives and identify environmental issues that are
reasonable or pertinent for analysis. Input from the scoping process
will assist NNSA in formulating the alternatives and defining the scope
of the SWEIS analysis.
Following the scoping process announced in this Notice, and after
consideration of comments received during scoping, NNSA will prepare a
Draft SWEIS for the continued operation of the Laboratory. NNSA expects
to issue the Draft SWEIS in 2023. NNSA will announce the availability
of the Draft SWEIS in the Federal Register and local media outlets.
NNSA will hold one or more public hearings for the Draft SWEIS. Any
comments received on the Draft SWEIS will be considered and addressed
in the Final SWEIS. NNSA could then issue a Record of Decision no
sooner than 30 days after publication by the Environmental Protection
Agency of a Notice of Availability of the Final SWEIS.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on August 15,
2022 by Jill Hruby, Under Secretary for Nuclear Security and
Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with
the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
[[Page 51086]]
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 16, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022-17901 Filed 8-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P