Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020, 48149-48151 [2022-16913]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Notices Members of the public are also entitled to submit written comments; the comments must be received in the regional office within 30 days following the meeting. Written comments may be emailed to Evelyn Bohor at ebohor@ usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact the Regional Programs Unit at (312) 353– 8311. Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Regional Programs Unit Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Records of the meeting will be available via www.facadatabase.gov under the Commission on Civil Rights, Colorado Advisory Committee link. Persons interested in the work of this Committee are directed to the Commission’s website, https:// www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Regional Programs Unit at the above email or street address. Agenda: Friday, September 9, 2022; 3:00 p.m. MT I. Welcome from Colorado Advisory Committee Chair II. Introductions III. Administrative Announcements IV. Short Orientation Presentation (DFO) V. Public Comment VI. Nominate Vice Chair (Chair) VII. Discuss Civil Rights Topics VIII. Discuss Next Steps IX. Adjournment Dated: August 3, 2022. David Mussatt, Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. [FR Doc. 2022–16938 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–12–2022] khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 38— Spartanburg County, South Carolina; Authorization of Production Activity, Swafford Warehousing, Inc. (Medical Kits), Greer, South Carolina On April 5, 2022, the South Carolina State Ports Authority, grantee of FTZ 38, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Swafford Warehousing, Inc., within FTZ 38, in Greer, South Carolina. The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (87 FR 21870, April 13, 2022). On August 3, 2022, the applicant VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:34 Aug 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s regulations, including Section 400.14. Dated: August 3, 2022. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2022–16910 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–33–2022] Foreign-Trade Zone 186—Waterville, Maine; Notification of Proposed Production Activity, Flemish Master Weavers (Machine-Made Woven Area Rugs), Sanford, Maine The City of Waterville, Maine, grantee of FTZ 186, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) on behalf of Flemish Master Weavers (FMW), located in Sanford, Maine, within Subzone 186A. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board’s regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on August 2, 2022. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status materials/ components and specific finished product described in the submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section of the Board’s website—accessible via www.trade.gov/ ftz. In 2016, FMW received limited FTZ authority to produce machine-made woven area rugs using polypropylene and polyester yarns in privileged foreign (PF) status (19 CFR 146.41), which precludes inverted tariff benefits on those inputs (see 81 FR 51850, August 5, 2016). In 2017, FMW requested authority to admit continuous filament polypropylene (CFPP) yarn in nonprivileged foreign (NPF) status (19 CFR 146.42) (B–28–2017, 82 FR 26434, 6/7/2017). That request was approved subject to the following restrictions: (1) the annual quantitative volume of CFPP yarn that FMW may admit into Subzone 186A under NPF status was limited to 3 million kilograms; and, (2) approval was limited to an initial period of five PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48149 years, subject to extension upon review (Board Order 2071, 83 FR 54709, 10/31/ 2018). The pending notification requests to remove the restriction requiring admission in PF status for CFPP yarn— to which FMW’s operation would otherwise be subject beginning on October 25, 2023 (upon expiration of the time-limited authority approved in Board Order 2071). The finished product is machinemade woven area rugs (duty-free). The proposed foreign-status materials and components include single-ply and twoply continuous filament polypropylene textured yarn (duty rates 8.8% and 8% respectively). The request indicates that the materials/components are subject to duties under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301), depending on the country of origin. The applicable Section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in PF status. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is September 19, 2022. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Online FTZ Information System’’ section of the Board’s website. For further information, contact Diane Finver at Diane.Finver@trade.gov. Dated: August 2, 2022. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2022–16911 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–051] Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) continues to determine that 17 exporters of certain hardwood plywood products (hardwood plywood) from the People’s Republic of China (China) under review had no shipments of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Commerce also continues to AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1 48150 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Notices determine that the 39 remaining companies subject to this review are part of the China-wide entity because they did not demonstrate eligibility for separate rates. DATES: Applicable August 8, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2593. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: to this notice in Appendix II. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Background Based on a review of the record and the comment received from interested parties, we made no changes to the Preliminary Results. On February 3, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.1 We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On June 2 and 30, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of this administrative review.2 The deadline for the final results of this review is now August 2, 2022.3 A complete summary of the events that occurred since publication of the Preliminary Results may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 Scope of the Order 5 The products covered by the Order are hardwood plywood from China. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached 1 See Certain Hardwood Plywood from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020, 87 FR 6137 (February 3, 2022) (Preliminary Results). 2 See Memoranda, ‘‘Certain Hardwood Plywood from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2020,’’ dated June 3, 2022; and ‘‘Certain Hardwood Plywood from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2020,’’ dated June 30, 2022. 3 Id. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People’s Republic of China; 2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 5 See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 504 (January 4, 2018) (Order). 21:34 Aug 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 Final Determination of No Shipments Commerce preliminarily found that 17 exporters had not shipped subject merchandise during the POR.6 As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received no shipment statements from these exporters, and their statements were consistent with the information we received from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).7 Therefore, for these final results, we continue to find that these 17 exporters had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. China-Wide Entity Analysis of Comments Received VerDate Sep<11>2014 Changes Since the Preliminary Results With the exception of the aforementioned 17 exporters that submitted no shipment certifications, we find all other companies for which a review was requested to be part of the China-wide entity. Accordingly, the companies listed in Appendix I are part of the China-wide entity.8 Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, we did not conduct a review of the China-wide entity. The rate previously established for the China-wide entity is 183.36 percent and is not subject to change as a result of this review.9 6 These 17 exporters are: (1) Shanghai Luli Trading Co., Ltd.; (2) Celtic Co., Ltd.; (3) Cosco Star International Co., Ltd.; (4) Happy Wood Industrial Group Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd.; (6) Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd.; (7) Linyi Glary Plywood Co., Ltd.; (8) Linyi Huasheng Yongbin Wood Co., Ltd.; (9) Linyi Jiahe Wood Industry Co., Ltd.; (10) Linyi Sanfortune Wood Co., Ltd.; (11) Qingdao Top P&Q International Corp.; (12) Shandong Qishan International Trading Co., Ltd.; (13) Shanghai Brightwood Trading Co., Ltd.; (14) Shanghai Futuwood Trading Co., Ltd.; (15) Suqian Hopeway International Trade Co., Ltd.; (16) Xuzhou Jiangyang Wood Industries Co., Ltd.; and (17) Zhejiang Dehua TB Import & Export Co., Ltd. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘No Shipment Inquiries for Multiple Companies during the Period 01/01/2020 through 12/31/2020,’’ dated April 16, 2021. 8 See Appendix I. 9 See Order. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Assessment Rates We have not calculated any assessment rates in this administrative review. Based on record evidence, we have determined that the aforementioned 17 companies had no shipments of subject merchandise, and therefore, pursuant to Commerce’s assessment practice, any suspended entries entered under their case numbers will be liquidated at the Chinawide entity rate.10 For all remaining companies subject to this review, which are part of the China-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to liquidate their entries at the current rate for the China-wide entity (i.e., 183.36 percent). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) the cash deposit rates for the 17 companies that had no shipments during the POR will remain unchanged from the rates assigned to them in the most recently completed segment for each company; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters that have separate rates, and which were not assigned the China-wide rate in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate (including the companies listed in Appendix I), the cash deposit rate will be that for the China-wide entity (i.e., 183.36 percent); and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese 10 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Notices exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: August 1, 2022. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 1. Anhui Hoda Wood Co., Ltd. 2. China Friend Limited. 3. Deqing China-Africa Foreign Trade Port Co., Ltd. 4. Feixian Jinde Wood Factory 5. G.D. Enterprise Limited 6. Henan Hongda Woodcraft Industry Co., Ltd. 7. Jiangsu Qianjiuren International Trading Co., Ltd. 8. Jiangsu Shengyang Industrial Joint Stock Co., Ltd. 9. Jiashan Dalin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 10. Jiaxing Kaochuan Woodwork Co., Ltd. 11. Leadwood Industrial Corp. 12. Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd. 13. Linyi City Dongfang Fukai Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 14. Linyi City Shenrui International Trade Co., Ltd. 15. Linyi Tian He Wooden Industry Co., Ltd. 16. Pizhou Dayun Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd. 21:34 Aug 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issue Comment: Commerce Should Ensure that All Subject Merchandise Is Subject to the Appropriate Duties V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–16913 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Appendix I—Companies Not Eligible for a Separate Rate VerDate Sep<11>2014 17. Pizhou Jin Sheng Yuan International Trade Co., Ltd. 18. Shandong Anxin Timber Co., Ltd. 19. Shandong Huaxin Jiasheng Wood Co., Ltd. 20. Shandong Huiyu International Trade Co., Ltd. 21. Shandong Johnson Trading Co., Ltd. 22. Shanghai S&M Trade Co., Ltd. 23. Smart Gift International 24. Suining Pengxiang Wood Co., Ltd. 25. Suqian Yaorun Trade Co., Ltd 26. Suzhou Dongsheng Wood Co., Ltd. 27. Suzhou Oriental Dragon Import and Export Co., Ltd. 28. Xuzhou Baoqi Wood Product Co., Ltd. 29. Xuzhou Dilun Wood Co. Ltd. 30. Xuzhou Eastern Huatai International Trading Co., Ltd. 31. Xuzhou Hansun Import & Export Co. Ltd. 32. Xuzhou Jiangheng Wood Products Co., Ltd. 33. Xuzhou Maker’s Mark Building Materials Co., Ltd. 34. Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co. Ltd. 35. Xuzhou Shuiwangxing Trading Co., Ltd. 36. Xuzhou Shuner Import & Export Trade Co. Ltd. 37. Xuzhou Tianshan Wood Co., Ltd. 38. Xuzhou Timber International Trade Co., Ltd. 39. Yangzhou Hanov International Co., Ltd. International Trade Administration [A–580–886] Ferrovanadium From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited sunset review, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on ferrovanadium from the Republic of Korea (Korea) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels identified in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable August 8, 2022. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48151 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krisha Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4037. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 15, 2017, Commerce published the AD order on ferrovanadium from Korea.1 On April 1, 2022, Commerce published the notice of initiation of this sunset review of the Order,2 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Subsequently, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate within the 15-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) from the Vanadium Producers and Reclaimers Association and its members, AMG Vanadium LLC and U.S. Vanadium, LLC (collectively, domestic interested parties).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under sections 771(9)(C) and (E) of the Act.4 On May 2, 2022, Commerce received an adequate substantive response to the notice of initiation from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party. On May 24, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.6 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is ferrovanadium from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.7 1 See Ferrovanadium from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 22309 (May 15, 2017) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 FR 19069 (April 1, 2022). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Ferrovanadium from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated April 11, 2022. 4 Id. at 2. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Ferrovanadium from the Republic of Korea: Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated May 2, 2022. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on April 1, 2022,’’ dated May 24, 2022. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Final Results of the E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM Continued 08AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 151 (Monday, August 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48149-48151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-051]


Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) continues to 
determine that 17 exporters of certain hardwood plywood products 
(hardwood plywood) from the People's Republic of China (China) under 
review had no shipments of subject merchandise during the period of 
review (POR) January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Commerce also 
continues to

[[Page 48150]]

determine that the 39 remaining companies subject to this review are 
part of the China-wide entity because they did not demonstrate 
eligibility for separate rates.

DATES: Applicable August 8, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On February 3, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
this administrative review.\1\ We invited parties to comment on the 
Preliminary Results. On June 2 and 30, 2022, Commerce extended the 
deadline for the final results of this administrative review.\2\ The 
deadline for the final results of this review is now August 2, 2022.\3\ 
A complete summary of the events that occurred since publication of the 
Preliminary Results may be found in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Hardwood Plywood from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020, 87 FR 6137 
(February 3, 2022) (Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See Memoranda, ``Certain Hardwood Plywood from the People's 
Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2020,'' dated June 3, 2022; 
and ``Certain Hardwood Plywood from the People's Republic of China: 
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 2020,'' dated June 30, 2022.
    \3\ Id.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's 
Republic of China; 2020,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby 
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's 
Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 
Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 504 (January 4, 2018) 
(Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The products covered by the Order are hardwood plywood from China. 
A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties 
raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is attached to this notice in Appendix II. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and the comment received from 
interested parties, we made no changes to the Preliminary Results.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    Commerce preliminarily found that 17 exporters had not shipped 
subject merchandise during the POR.\6\ As noted in the Preliminary 
Results, we received no shipment statements from these exporters, and 
their statements were consistent with the information we received from 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).\7\ Therefore, for these final 
results, we continue to find that these 17 exporters had no shipments 
of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ These 17 exporters are: (1) Shanghai Luli Trading Co., Ltd.; 
(2) Celtic Co., Ltd.; (3) Cosco Star International Co., Ltd.; (4) 
Happy Wood Industrial Group Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Hengtong Wood 
Co., Ltd.; (6) Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd.; (7) Linyi Glary 
Plywood Co., Ltd.; (8) Linyi Huasheng Yongbin Wood Co., Ltd.; (9) 
Linyi Jiahe Wood Industry Co., Ltd.; (10) Linyi Sanfortune Wood Co., 
Ltd.; (11) Qingdao Top P&Q International Corp.; (12) Shandong Qishan 
International Trading Co., Ltd.; (13) Shanghai Brightwood Trading 
Co., Ltd.; (14) Shanghai Futuwood Trading Co., Ltd.; (15) Suqian 
Hopeway International Trade Co., Ltd.; (16) Xuzhou Jiangyang Wood 
Industries Co., Ltd.; and (17) Zhejiang Dehua TB Import & Export 
Co., Ltd.
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``No Shipment Inquiries for Multiple 
Companies during the Period 01/01/2020 through 12/31/2020,'' dated 
April 16, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Entity

    With the exception of the aforementioned 17 exporters that 
submitted no shipment certifications, we find all other companies for 
which a review was requested to be part of the China-wide entity. 
Accordingly, the companies listed in Appendix I are part of the China-
wide entity.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, we 
did not conduct a review of the China-wide entity. The rate previously 
established for the China-wide entity is 183.36 percent and is not 
subject to change as a result of this review.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    We have not calculated any assessment rates in this administrative 
review. Based on record evidence, we have determined that the 
aforementioned 17 companies had no shipments of subject merchandise, 
and therefore, pursuant to Commerce's assessment practice, any 
suspended entries entered under their case numbers will be liquidated 
at the China-wide entity rate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For all remaining companies subject to this review, which are part 
of the China-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to liquidate their 
entries at the current rate for the China-wide entity (i.e., 183.36 
percent). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no 
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results 
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at 
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of 
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by 
sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): 
(1) the cash deposit rates for the 17 companies that had no shipments 
during the POR will remain unchanged from the rates assigned to them in 
the most recently completed segment for each company; (2) for 
previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters 
that have separate rates, and which were not assigned the China-wide 
rate in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject 
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate 
(including the companies listed in Appendix I), the cash deposit rate 
will be that for the China-wide entity (i.e., 183.36 percent); and (4) 
for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not 
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
applicable to the Chinese

[[Page 48151]]

exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject 
to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    These final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: August 1, 2022.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I--Companies Not Eligible for a Separate Rate

1. Anhui Hoda Wood Co., Ltd.
2. China Friend Limited.
3. Deqing China-Africa Foreign Trade Port Co., Ltd.
4. Feixian Jinde Wood Factory
5. G.D. Enterprise Limited
6. Henan Hongda Woodcraft Industry Co., Ltd.
7. Jiangsu Qianjiuren International Trading Co., Ltd.
8. Jiangsu Shengyang Industrial Joint Stock Co., Ltd.
9. Jiashan Dalin Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
10. Jiaxing Kaochuan Woodwork Co., Ltd.
11. Leadwood Industrial Corp.
12. Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd.
13. Linyi City Dongfang Fukai Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
14. Linyi City Shenrui International Trade Co., Ltd.
15. Linyi Tian He Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.
16. Pizhou Dayun Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd.
17. Pizhou Jin Sheng Yuan International Trade Co., Ltd.
18. Shandong Anxin Timber Co., Ltd.
19. Shandong Huaxin Jiasheng Wood Co., Ltd.
20. Shandong Huiyu International Trade Co., Ltd.
21. Shandong Johnson Trading Co., Ltd.
22. Shanghai S&M Trade Co., Ltd.
23. Smart Gift International
24. Suining Pengxiang Wood Co., Ltd.
25. Suqian Yaorun Trade Co., Ltd
26. Suzhou Dongsheng Wood Co., Ltd.
27. Suzhou Oriental Dragon Import and Export Co., Ltd.
28. Xuzhou Baoqi Wood Product Co., Ltd.
29. Xuzhou Dilun Wood Co. Ltd.
30. Xuzhou Eastern Huatai International Trading Co., Ltd.
31. Xuzhou Hansun Import & Export Co. Ltd.
32. Xuzhou Jiangheng Wood Products Co., Ltd.
33. Xuzhou Maker's Mark Building Materials Co., Ltd.
34. Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co. Ltd.
35. Xuzhou Shuiwangxing Trading Co., Ltd.
36. Xuzhou Shuner Import & Export Trade Co. Ltd.
37. Xuzhou Tianshan Wood Co., Ltd.
38. Xuzhou Timber International Trade Co., Ltd.
39. Yangzhou Hanov International Co., Ltd.

Appendix II--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issue
    Comment: Commerce Should Ensure that All Subject Merchandise Is 
Subject to the Appropriate Duties
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-16913 Filed 8-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.