Regulatory Reform Initiative: Streamlining Surety Bond Guarantee Program, 48080-48084 [2022-16875]
Download as PDF
48080
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
https://ask.fdic.gov/fdicinformation
andsupportcenter.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 343—CONSUMER PROTECTION
IN SALES OF INSURANCE
3. The authority citation for part 343
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819 (Seventh and
Tenth), 1831x.
4. Revise appendix A to part 343 to
read as follows:
■
Appendix A to Part 343—Consumer
Grievance Process
Any consumer who believes that any
institution or any other person selling,
soliciting, advertising, or offering insurance
products or annuities to the consumer at an
office of the institution or on behalf of the
institution has violated the requirements of
this part should contact the Division of
Depositor and Consumer Protection, National
Center for Consumer and Deposit Assistance,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 1100
Walnut Street, Box #11, Kansas City, MO
64106, or telephone 1–877–275–3342, or
FDIC Electronic Customer Assistance Form at
https://ask.fdic.gov/fdicinformation
andsupportcenter.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dated at Washington, DC, on August 3,
2022.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–16961 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 115
RIN 3245–AH08
Regulatory Reform Initiative:
Streamlining Surety Bond Guarantee
Program
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule revises various
regulations related to SBA’s Surety
Bond Guarantee (SBG) program because
they are obsolete, unnecessary,
ineffective, or burdensome.
Additionally, this final rule clarifies and
modernizes certain regulations and
conforms them to industry standards.
DATES: This rule is effective September
7, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jermaine Perry, Management Analyst,
Office of Surety Guarantees at (202)
401–8275 or jermaine.perry@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Aug 05, 2022
Jkt 256001
A. General Information
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) guarantees bid,
payment, and performance bonds for
small and emerging contractors who
cannot obtain surety bonds through
regular commercial channels. SBA’s
guarantee, authorized pursuant to part B
of title IV of the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, 15 U.S.C. 694a
et seq., gives Sureties an incentive to
provide bonding for small businesses
and thereby assists small businesses in
obtaining greater access to contracting
opportunities. SBA’s guarantee is an
agreement between a Surety and SBA
that SBA will assume a certain
percentage of the Surety’s loss should a
contractor default on the underlying
contract. SBA is authorized to guarantee
a Surety for a contract up to $6.5 million
and, with the certification of a
contracting officer of a Federal agency,
up to $10 million. For more information
about SBA’s Surety Bond Guarantee
Program (SBG Program), see https://
www.sba.gov/funding-programs/suretybonds.
As part of its ongoing responsibility to
ensure that the rules it issues do not
have an adverse economic impact on
those affected by those rules, the U.S.
Small Business Administration (SBA)
published an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in the
Federal Register on June 3, 2019 (84 FR
25496) seeking input from the public in
identifying regulations under the SBG
Program that affected parties believed
should be repealed, replaced, or
modified because they are obsolete,
unnecessary, ineffective, or
burdensome. In the ANPRM, SBA also
solicited comments from the public on
how SBA can improve the surety bond
products, procedures, forms, and
reporting requirements of the SBG
Program. SBA considered the 54
comments submitted by the public in
response and published a proposed rule
in the Federal Register on September
23, 2021 (86 FR 52844) to revise various
regulations in part 115 of title 13 of the
Code of Federal Regulations that are
obsolete, unnecessary, ineffective, or
burdensome and to clarify and
modernize certain regulations to
conform them to industry standards.
The comment period was open until
November 22, 2021.
In response to the request for
comments, SBA received 8 comments,
including 2 from national trade
associations, 5 from surety
organizations, and 1 was anonymous.
The commenters expressed general
support for all or some of the proposed
changes, and SBA received no
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comments expressing opposition to any
of the proposed changes (with one
comment received that did not relate to
any of the proposed changes).
The comments received are
summarized and addressed below in the
section-by-section analysis.
C. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 115.10. Under the current
definition of ‘‘Contract’’ in this section,
a Contract may include a maintenance
agreement that is ancillary to a Contract
for which SBA is guaranteeing the bond
(‘‘ancillary maintenance agreement’’).
SBA proposed to clarify the definition
for these ancillary maintenance
agreements and to also expand the
definition of Contract to include standalone maintenance agreements.
Under the current definition, SBA
will guarantee the bond for a
maintenance agreement if the agreement
is for 2 years or less and covers
defective workmanship or materials
only. It has been SBA’s long-standing
interpretation that the maintenance
agreement must be ancillary to the
Contract for which SBA is guaranteeing
the bond and may not cover defective
workmanship or materials that is
covered by a manufacturer’s warranty.
The current definition also provides
that, with SBA’s written approval, the
term of a maintenance agreement can be
longer than 2 years for defective
workmanship or materials or cover
something other than defective
workmanship or materials if the
agreement is ancillary to the Contract
for which SBA is guaranteeing a bond,
is performed by the same Principal, and
is customarily required in the relevant
trade or industry.
For clarity, SBA proposed to modify
the existing definition by expressly
applying the following requirements to
all ancillary maintenance agreements:
(1) the agreement must be ancillary to a
Contract for which SBA is guaranteeing
a bond; (2) the agreement must be
performed by the same Principal; and
(3) the agreement may only cover
defective workmanship or materials that
are not covered by a manufacturer’s
warranty. With SBA’s prior written
approval, the agreement covering
defective workmanship or materials
may be for a term longer than 2 years,
or the agreement may cover something
other than defective workmanship or
materials, if such agreement is
customarily required in the relevant
trade or industry.
SBA received one comment from a
national trade association expressing
support for the changes to the
definition, noting that the need for the
SBG Program to cover stand-alone
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
maintenance bonds was raised by a
small contractor participant at a
bonding awareness education program.
The commenter also suggested that
maintenance bonds can be structured as
an annual renewable performance bond.
However, annually renewable multiyear stand-alone maintenance
agreements would be covered by SOP 50
45 3, section 5.5, which states that such
contracts are eligible for SBA’s
guarantee provided that the contract
amount does not exceed the statutory
limit and provided that each option year
following the initial contract year is
treated as a separate obligation for
which a new guarantee application must
be submitted. SBA is adopting the
changes as proposed.
Section 115.12. Under section
411(a)(1)(B) of the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, SBA may
guarantee a surety bond for a total work
order or contract amount that is greater
than $6,500,000 (as adjusted for
inflation under 41 U.S.C. 1908), but not
exceeding $10,000,000, if a Contracting
Officer (CO) of a Federal agency certifies
that such a guarantee is necessary.
Paragraph (e)(3) of section 115.12
currently requires the CO’s certification
to include a statement that the small
business is experiencing difficulty
obtaining a bond and that an SBA bond
guarantee would be in the best interests
of the Government. In response to
comments received in response to the
ANPRM ((84 FR 25496), SBA proposed
to streamline paragraph (e)(3) to remove
the requirement of this statement and
require only that the CO certify that the
guarantee is necessary, which as noted
above is the standard set forth in the
statute. SBA also proposed to update the
manner in which this certification may
be submitted to SBA by providing that
it may be either express mailed to SBA,
Office of Surety Guarantees, 409 Third
Street SW, Washington, DC 20416, or
submitted by email to suretybonds@
sba.gov, along with additional
information that identifies the small
business and the contract. SBA received
two comments from two national trade
associations expressing support for
these changes, and 4 other comments
expressing general support for the
proposed rule. SBA is adopting the
changes as proposed.
Section 115.14. Paragraph (a) of this
section provides that, if one of the six
events listed in paragraph (a) occurs
under an SBA-guaranteed bond, the
Principal and its Affiliates lose
eligibility for further SBA bond
guarantees. One such event, described
in paragraph (a)(3), is when the Surety
has established a claim reserve for an
SBA-guaranteed bond of at least $1,000,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Aug 05, 2022
Jkt 256001
an amount which was set by the SBG
Program in 1996. As SBA explained in
the proposed rule, SBA considered the
purpose of this provision, which is to
exclude Principals that have
demonstrated an unacceptable financial
risk under a current SBA-guaranteed
bond from receiving future SBA bond
guarantees and determined that the
$1,000 claim reserve threshold no
longer reflects a degree of financial risk
that should trigger the Principal’s
ineligibility for future SBA bond
guarantees. After evaluating several
factors, including inflation since 1996,
the increase in the maximum contract
amount for which SBA can issue a bond
guarantee (from $1,250,000 in 1996 to
$6,500,000 today), and historical claim
reserve data, SBA proposed to increase
the amount of the claim reserve that
would result in the Principal and its
Affiliates losing eligibility for further
SBA bond guarantees from at least
$1,000 to at least $10,000. SBA received
five comments in general support of this
change, and SBA is adopting this
change as proposed.
Sections 115.19 and 115.64. Under
§ 115.19(f)(1)(ii), SBA is relieved of
liability under the bond guarantee if the
bond was executed ‘‘after the work
under the Contract had begun’’ unless
the Surety submitted, and SBA
executed, SBA Form 991, ‘‘Surety Bond
Guarantee Agreement Addendum’’ with
the evidence and certifications required
by § 115.19(f)(1)(ii). Paragraph (f)(2)(i)
currently provides that work under a
contract is considered to have begun
when a Principal ‘‘takes any action at
the job site which would have exposed
the Surety to liability under applicable
law had a bond been Executed (or
approved, if the Surety is legally bound
by such approval) at the time.’’ In
addition, under 13 CFR 115.64, a Surety
participating in the Preferred Surety
Bond Program (PSB Surety) is
prohibited from executing or approving
a bond ‘‘after commencement of work
under a contract’’ unless the Surety
obtains written approval from the
Director of Office of Surety Guarantees
(OSG). To apply for such approval, the
Surety must submit a completed SBA
Form 991 with the evidence and
certifications required under
§ 115.19(f)(1)(ii).
SBA proposed to clarify what
constitutes ‘‘commencement of work’’
under § 115.64 by amending both
§§ 115.19(f)(2)(i) and 115.64 to state that
work under a contract is considered to
have begun or commenced when the
contractor takes any action related to the
contract or bond that would have
exposed its Surety to liability under
applicable law had a bond been
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48081
executed (or approved, if the Surety is
legally bound by such approval) at the
time. The work would not have to occur
‘‘at the job site’’ to find that work has
begun or commenced under the
contract. For example, SBA explained
that work would be deemed to have
begun or commenced when the
contractor takes any financial action
that would be typically covered under
the bond, such as purchasing supplies
that will be used to complete the
contract.
SBA received five comments
expressing general support for this
change, and SBA is adopting the change
as proposed.
Section 115.30. SBA proposed to
revise the introductory language of
paragraph (d)(2) to increase the
maximum amount of the contracts for
which a Prior Approval Surety would be
permitted to use the Quick Bond
Guarantee Application and Agreement
(SBA Form 990A) (Quick Bond
Application) from $400,000 to $500,000.
As explained in the proposed rule, SBA
conducted a risk assessment, considered
factors such as the increasing average
contract value, and considered the
potential decrease in overall application
burden on small businesses. SBA
determined that increasing the
maximum contract value for using the
Quick Bond Application would
minimally increase program risk while
reducing costs to Sureties and small
businesses by $36,343 per year. In
addition to reducing costs, SBA
expressed hope that this change would
result in the additional benefit of
increasing overall access to the SBG
Program.
SBA received three comments
expressly supporting this change. A
commenter stated this change aligns
with current surety industry practices
for quick/fast bond application limits.
The commenter noted that participating
sureties may still want to review
financial information should a
contractor have questionable credit
history, and SBA agrees that such
review would be necessary to ensure
that sureties apply standards generally
accepted by the surety industry for all
of its bonds, including its Quick Bond
applications. The commenter stated that
the proposed change makes the
approval process easier and faster and
provides greater opportunity for small
businesses. Another commenter stated
that the increase will allow businesses
with simple accounting needs to pursue
qualified work, and the third
commenter expressed general support
for the change. SBA is adopting this
change as proposed.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
48082
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
In addition, SBA proposed to allow
this streamlined form to be used in
additional circumstances. Paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) lists the circumstances under
which the Quick Bond Application may
not be used. Under paragraph
(d)(2)(ii)(D), the Quick Bond
Application may not be used if the
contract includes a provision for
liquidated damages that exceeds $1,000
per day. In response to comments
received in response to the ANPRM,
SBA proposed to increase this amount
to $2,500 per day to align with current
industry standards. In response to the
NPRM, SBA received one comment
suggesting that SBA consider using a
sliding scale approach based on contract
size for liquidated damages instead of
increasing the maximum to $2,500 per
day, stating that this approach would
align with surety industry practices.
However, SBA does not agree with
creating a sliding scale based on
contract sizes and believes that SBA’s
approach of creating a maximum
amount reduces program complexity
and provides clear guidelines allowing
surety partners to easily assess program
requirements. In addition, SBA received
5 comments in response to the ANPRM
requesting that the maximum amount of
liquidated damages be set at $2,500.
SBA is adopting this change as
proposed.
In addition, paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(E)
provides that the Quick Bond
Application may not be used for
demolition contracts. As SBA explained
in the NPRM, SBA proposed, in
response to comments received on the
ANPRM, to remove demolition contracts
from the list of categories that are
excluded from using the Quick Bond
Application. However, as stated in the
NPRM, SBA expects that Sureties will,
in their underwriting, ensure that the
Principal has obtained any permit that
is required for demolition pursuant to
Federal, State or local law and that SBA
will provide further guidance on the
underwriting of demolition contracts in
its Standard Operating Procedures. SBA
received five comments expressing
general support for this change, and
SBA is adopting this change as
proposed.
Sections 115.32 and 115.67.
Paragraph (d) of § 115.32 governs when
a Prior Approval Surety must notify
SBA of any increase or decrease in the
contract or bond amount. It also governs
when any increase or decrease in the
Principal and Surety fees that results
from a change in the contract amount
must be remitted to SBA by the
Principal or Surety or will be refunded
by SBA. In addition, for the PSB
Program, § 115.67(a) and (b) govern
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Aug 05, 2022
Jkt 256001
when any increase or decrease in the
Principal and Surety fees resulting from
a change in the contract amount must be
remitted or will be refunded or adjusted.
Currently, the payment for any increase
in either the Principal’s or the Surety’s
fee is due to SBA when the total amount
of the change in that fee equals or
exceeds $40, and any decrease in the fee
is refunded to the Principal or rebated/
adjusted to the Surety by SBA when the
total amount of the change in the fee
equals or exceeds $40.
SBA proposed to revise §§ 115.32(d)
and 115.67 to increase the threshold
amount for when an increase in the
Principal or Surety fee would be due, or
for when SBA would refund or rebate/
adjust any decrease in these fees, from
$40 to $250. SBA received five
comments expressing general support of
this change, with one commenter
suggesting that this increase will save
the SBA money in the long run by
reducing the administrative costs
involved in processing small increases
in contract amounts. SBA is adopting
this change as proposed.
Section 115.33. Under this section,
SBA may approve a surety bonding line
for a Prior Approval Surety under which
the Surety may execute multiple bonds
for a specified small business. SBA
proposed to revise paragraph (d)(1),
which addresses the form that must be
submitted for a Bid Bond executed
under a bonding line, to remove the
reference to SBA Form 994B, ‘‘Surety
Bond Guarantee Underwriting Review’’,
and replace it with SBA Form 990,
‘‘Surety Bond Guarantee Agreement’’.
SBA Form 990 is the agreement between
SBA and the Surety for SBA’s guarantee
of the bond and is, therefore, the
appropriate form for Sureties to submit
for SBA approval of a bond under a
bonding line. There is no need to
separately refer to SBA Form 994B in
this regulation because that form, as the
Surety indicates in its certification in
SBA Form 990, is submitted with SBA
Form 990 as a supporting document. In
addition, for Final Bonds executed
under a bonding line, paragraph (d)(2)
of this section currently states that the
Surety is to submit both SBA Forms 990
and 994B to SBA for approval. For
consistency and for the same reasons
described above, SBA proposed to
remove the reference to SBA Form 994B
in paragraph (d)(2). In response to the
NPRM, SBA received five comments
expressing general support for these
changes and SBA is adopting the
changes as proposed.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Compliance With Executive Orders
12866, 12988, 13132, and 13563, the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
801–808), the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C., Ch. 35), and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this rule does not
constitute a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. This action does not have
preemptive effect or retroactive effect.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not have federalism
implications as defined in Executive
Order 13132. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in the
Executive Order. As such it does not
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Executive Order 13563
Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review
(January 18, 2011), requires agencies to
adopt regulations through a process that
involves public participation, and to the
extent feasible, base regulations on the
open exchange of information and
perspectives from affected stakeholders
and the public as a whole. As discussed
above, SBA published an ANPRM in the
Federal Register (84 FR 25496) on June
3, 2019 seeking input from the public in
identifying regulations under the SBG
Program that affected parties believed
should be repealed, replaced, or
modified because they are obsolete,
unnecessary, ineffective, or
burdensome. SBA also solicited
comments from the public on how SBA
can improve the surety bond products,
procedures, forms, and reporting
requirements of the SBG Program. The
comment period for the ANPRM ended
on August 2, 2019, and SBA considered
the 54 comments submitted by the
public in response to prepare the Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking published in
the Federal Register on September 23,
2021 (86 FR 52844). Further, in issuing
this final rule, SBA considered the 8
comments SBA received in response to
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
the request for comments on the
proposed rule.
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801–
808
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this is not a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.,
Ch. 35
SBA has determined that this final
rule would not impose new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. However, the
rule will require a minor revision to
SBA Form 990A, Quick Bond
Application (OMB Control No: 3245–
0378), to conform to the change in 13
CFR 115.30 increasing the maximum
amount of the contracts for which a
Prior Approval Surety may use this
streamlined application. Revising the
form to change the amount from
$400,000 to $500,000 will not have any
impact on the burden for this
information collection, which is
currently approved under OMB Control
Number 3245–0378. OMB approved
SBA’s request to make this nonsubstantive change to the form.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612
When an agency issues a final rule,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires the agency to ‘‘prepare and
make available for public comment an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis’’
which will ‘‘describe the impact of the
proposed rule on small entities.’’ (5
U.S.C. 603(a)). However, section 605 of
the RFA allows an agency to certify a
rule, in lieu of preparing an analysis, if
the rulemaking is not expected to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
In the NPRM (86 FR 52844), SBA
solicited comments from the public to
identify which of SBA’s regulations
relating to the SBG program should be
repealed, replaced, or modified because
they are obsolete, unnecessary,
ineffective, or burdensome. SBA also
solicited comments from the public on
how SBA can improve the surety bond
products, procedures, forms, and
reporting requirements of the SBG
Program. SBA’s proposed revisions in
response to comments received are
consistent with these goals and with
increasing the consistency of these
regulations with industry standards.
Under 13 CFR 115.11, Sureties
participating in SBA’s SBG Program
must be a corporation listed by the U.S.
Treasury as eligible to issue bonds in
connection with Federal procurement
contracts. There are 256 Treasury-listed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Aug 05, 2022
Jkt 256001
Sureties, of which 41 are program
partners in the SBG Program. SBA
estimates that 12 of these 41 Surety
companies are small under SBA’s size
standards. In addition, most small
businesses that receive an SBAguaranteed bond operate within the
236220 NAICS industry code
(Commercial and Institutional Building
Construction). According to the U.S.
Census Bureau, there are a total of
38,079 small business companies that
operate within the 236220 NAICS code,
and SBA provided guarantees in 2017
for 1,602 of these small businesses. Even
if the number of entities that may be
affected by this rule is considered
significant, SBA has determined that the
economic impact on these entities
would not be substantial. The rules
would repeal, replace, or modify
obsolete or outdated SBG Program
requirements that will have the effect of
reducing the burden on Sureties and
small businesses that receive bonds
under the SBG Program. In addition,
SBA anticipates that the rules would
streamline outdated procedures and
increase small business access to bond
guarantees. Further, the rule would
reduce costs 1 to Sureties and small
businesses receiving an SBA-guaranteed
bond while any costs of adjustment to
revisions are de minimis. Thus, SBA
does not expect that this rule would
have a significant economic impact on
its program participants. Accordingly,
the Administrator of the SBA hereby
certifies that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 115
Claims, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses, Surety
bonds.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, SBA amends 13 CFR part 115
as follows:
PART 115—SURETY BOND
GUARANTEE
1. The authority citation for part 115
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. app 3; 15 U.S.C. 636i,
687b, 687c, 694a, and 694b note.
2. Amend § 115.10 by revising the
definition of ‘‘Contract’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 115.10
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Contract means a written obligation of
the Principal, including an Order,
requiring the furnishing of services,
1 An example is the reduction in cost mentioned
in the analysis of § 115.30.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48083
supplies, labor, materials, machinery,
equipment or construction. A Contract:
(1) Must not prohibit a Surety from
performing the Contract upon default of
the Principal;
(2) Does not include a permit,
subdivision contract, lease, land
contract, evidence of debt, financial
guarantee (e.g., a contract requiring any
payment by the Principal to the Obligee,
except for contracts in connection with
bid and performance bonds for the sale
of timber and/or other forest products,
such as biomass, that require the
Principal to pay the Obligee), warranty
of performance or efficiency, warranty
of fidelity, or release of lien (other than
for claims under a guaranteed bond);
and
(3) May include a maintenance
agreement under the following
circumstances:
(i) The maintenance agreement is
ancillary to a Contract for which SBA is
guaranteeing a bond, is performed by
the same Principal, is for a period of 2
years or less, and only covers defective
workmanship or materials that are not
covered by a manufacturer’s warranty.
With SBA’s prior written approval, the
agreement may cover a period longer
than 2 years, or cover something other
than defective workmanship or
materials, if a longer period or
something other than defective
workmanship or materials is
customarily required in the relevant
trade or industry; or
(ii) The maintenance agreement is
stand-alone and is entered into in
connection with a Contract for which a
bond was not required and only covers
defective workmanship or materials that
are not covered by a manufacturer’s
warranty. The agreement must cover a
period of 3 years or less that begins
immediately after the Contract is
complete and must be executed prior to
the completion of the Contract. It must
also be entered into with the same
Principal that completed the Contract.
With SBA’s prior written approval, the
agreement may cover a period longer
than 3 years if a longer period is
customarily required in the relevant
trade or industry.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 115.12 by revising
paragraph (e)(3) to read as follows:
§ 115.12 General program policies and
provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) Federal Contracts or Orders in
excess of $6,500,000 (as adjusted for
inflation in accordance with section
1908 of title 41, United States Code).
SBA is authorized to guarantee bonds
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
48084
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
on Federal Contracts or Orders greater
than $6,500,000 (as adjusted for
inflation in accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1908), but not exceeding $10,000,000,
upon a signed certification of a Federal
contracting officer that the SBA
guarantee is necessary. The certification
must be either express mailed to SBA,
Office of Surety Guarantees, 409 Third
Street SW, Washington, DC 20416 or
sent by email to suretybonds@sba.gov,
and include the following additional
information:
(i) Name, address and telephone
number of the small business;
(ii) Offer or Contract number and brief
description of the contract; and
(iii) Estimated Contract value and date
of anticipated award determination.
*
*
*
*
*
■
§ 115.14
§ 115.67
[Amended]
§ 115.64
Timeliness requirement.
* * * For purposes of this section,
work has commenced under a Contract
when a Principal takes any action
related to the contract or bond that
would have exposed its Surety to
liability under applicable law had a
bond been Executed (or approved, if the
Surety is legally bound by such
approval) at the time.
[Amended]
10. Amend § 115.67 by removing
‘‘$40’’ wherever it appears and adding
in its place ‘‘$250’’.
4. Amend § 115.14 in paragraph (a)(3)
by removing ‘‘$1000’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘$10,000’’.
■ 5. Amend § 115.19 by revising
paragraph (f)(2)(i) to read as follows:
■
§ 115.19
[FR Doc. 2022–16875 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am]
■
Denial of liability.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2)(i) For purposes of paragraph
(f)(1)(ii) of this section, work under a
Contract is considered to have begun
when a Principal takes any action
related to the contract or bond that
would have exposed its Surety to
liability under applicable law had a
bond been Executed (or approved, if the
Surety is legally bound by such
approval) at the time.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 115.30
[Amended]
6. Amend § 115.30:
a. In paragraph (d)(2)(i) by removing
‘‘$400,000’’ and adding in its place
‘‘$500,000’’;
■ b. In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(D) by
removing ‘‘$1,000’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘$2,500’’; and
■ c. In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(E) by
removing ‘‘demolition,’’.
§ 115.32
[Amended]
[Amended]
8. Amend § 115.33:
a. In paragraph (d)(1) by removing the
phrase ’’ ‘‘Surety Bond Guarantee
Underwriting Review’’ (SBA Form
994B)’’ and adding in its place the
phrase ’’ ‘‘Surety Bond Guarantee
Agreement’’ (Form 990)’’; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Aug 05, 2022
Jkt 256001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0631; Special
Conditions No. 25–813–SC]
Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 6X Airplane; Flight
Envelope Protection: Normal LoadFactor (g) Limiting
These special conditions are
issued for the Dassault Aviation
(Dassault) Model Falcon 6X airplane.
This airplane will have a novel or
unusual design feature when compared
to the state of technology envisioned in
the airworthiness standards for
transport category airplanes. This design
feature is an electronic flight-control
system (EFCS) that incorporates fulltime, normal load-factor limiting,
designed to prevent the pilot from
inadvertently or intentionally exceeding
the positive or negative airplane limit
load factor. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
SUMMARY:
7. Amend § 115.32 in paragraphs
(d)(2) and (3) by removing ‘‘$40’’
wherever it appears and adding in its
place ‘‘$250’’.
■
■
BILLING CODE 8026–03–P
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
■
§ 115.33
Isabella Casillas Guzman,
Administrator.
AGENCY:
■
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
b. In paragraph (d)(2) by removing the
phrase ‘‘a Surety Bond Guarantee
Underwriting Review (SBA Form 994B)
and’’ in the first sentence, and removing
the phrase ‘‘these forms’’ in the second
sentence and adding in its place the
phrase ‘‘this form’’.
■ 9. Amend § 115.64 by adding a new
last sentence to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on
Dassault on August 8, 2022. Send
comments on or before September 22,
2022.
Send comments identified
by Docket No. FAA–2021–0631 using
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: Except for Confidential
Business Information (CBI) as described
in the following paragraph, and other
information as described in title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special
conditions.
Confidential Business Information:
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
is commercial or financial information
that is both customarily and actually
treated as private by its owner. Under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
(5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments
responsive to these special conditions
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to these special conditions, it
is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and the
indicated comments will not be placed
in the public docket of these special
conditions. Send submissions
containing CBI to Troy Brown,
Performance and Environment Section,
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 151 (Monday, August 8, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48080-48084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16875]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 115
RIN 3245-AH08
Regulatory Reform Initiative: Streamlining Surety Bond Guarantee
Program
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule revises various regulations related to SBA's
Surety Bond Guarantee (SBG) program because they are obsolete,
unnecessary, ineffective, or burdensome. Additionally, this final rule
clarifies and modernizes certain regulations and conforms them to
industry standards.
DATES: This rule is effective September 7, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jermaine Perry, Management Analyst,
Office of Surety Guarantees at (202) 401-8275 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. General Information
The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) guarantees bid,
payment, and performance bonds for small and emerging contractors who
cannot obtain surety bonds through regular commercial channels. SBA's
guarantee, authorized pursuant to part B of title IV of the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958, 15 U.S.C. 694a et seq., gives Sureties
an incentive to provide bonding for small businesses and thereby
assists small businesses in obtaining greater access to contracting
opportunities. SBA's guarantee is an agreement between a Surety and SBA
that SBA will assume a certain percentage of the Surety's loss should a
contractor default on the underlying contract. SBA is authorized to
guarantee a Surety for a contract up to $6.5 million and, with the
certification of a contracting officer of a Federal agency, up to $10
million. For more information about SBA's Surety Bond Guarantee Program
(SBG Program), see https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/surety-bonds.
As part of its ongoing responsibility to ensure that the rules it
issues do not have an adverse economic impact on those affected by
those rules, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) published an
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal Register
on June 3, 2019 (84 FR 25496) seeking input from the public in
identifying regulations under the SBG Program that affected parties
believed should be repealed, replaced, or modified because they are
obsolete, unnecessary, ineffective, or burdensome. In the ANPRM, SBA
also solicited comments from the public on how SBA can improve the
surety bond products, procedures, forms, and reporting requirements of
the SBG Program. SBA considered the 54 comments submitted by the public
in response and published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on
September 23, 2021 (86 FR 52844) to revise various regulations in part
115 of title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations that are obsolete,
unnecessary, ineffective, or burdensome and to clarify and modernize
certain regulations to conform them to industry standards. The comment
period was open until November 22, 2021.
In response to the request for comments, SBA received 8 comments,
including 2 from national trade associations, 5 from surety
organizations, and 1 was anonymous. The commenters expressed general
support for all or some of the proposed changes, and SBA received no
comments expressing opposition to any of the proposed changes (with one
comment received that did not relate to any of the proposed changes).
The comments received are summarized and addressed below in the
section-by-section analysis.
C. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 115.10. Under the current definition of ``Contract'' in
this section, a Contract may include a maintenance agreement that is
ancillary to a Contract for which SBA is guaranteeing the bond
(``ancillary maintenance agreement''). SBA proposed to clarify the
definition for these ancillary maintenance agreements and to also
expand the definition of Contract to include stand-alone maintenance
agreements.
Under the current definition, SBA will guarantee the bond for a
maintenance agreement if the agreement is for 2 years or less and
covers defective workmanship or materials only. It has been SBA's long-
standing interpretation that the maintenance agreement must be
ancillary to the Contract for which SBA is guaranteeing the bond and
may not cover defective workmanship or materials that is covered by a
manufacturer's warranty. The current definition also provides that,
with SBA's written approval, the term of a maintenance agreement can be
longer than 2 years for defective workmanship or materials or cover
something other than defective workmanship or materials if the
agreement is ancillary to the Contract for which SBA is guaranteeing a
bond, is performed by the same Principal, and is customarily required
in the relevant trade or industry.
For clarity, SBA proposed to modify the existing definition by
expressly applying the following requirements to all ancillary
maintenance agreements: (1) the agreement must be ancillary to a
Contract for which SBA is guaranteeing a bond; (2) the agreement must
be performed by the same Principal; and (3) the agreement may only
cover defective workmanship or materials that are not covered by a
manufacturer's warranty. With SBA's prior written approval, the
agreement covering defective workmanship or materials may be for a term
longer than 2 years, or the agreement may cover something other than
defective workmanship or materials, if such agreement is customarily
required in the relevant trade or industry.
SBA received one comment from a national trade association
expressing support for the changes to the definition, noting that the
need for the SBG Program to cover stand-alone
[[Page 48081]]
maintenance bonds was raised by a small contractor participant at a
bonding awareness education program. The commenter also suggested that
maintenance bonds can be structured as an annual renewable performance
bond. However, annually renewable multi-year stand-alone maintenance
agreements would be covered by SOP 50 45 3, section 5.5, which states
that such contracts are eligible for SBA's guarantee provided that the
contract amount does not exceed the statutory limit and provided that
each option year following the initial contract year is treated as a
separate obligation for which a new guarantee application must be
submitted. SBA is adopting the changes as proposed.
Section 115.12. Under section 411(a)(1)(B) of the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, SBA may guarantee a surety bond for a total
work order or contract amount that is greater than $6,500,000 (as
adjusted for inflation under 41 U.S.C. 1908), but not exceeding
$10,000,000, if a Contracting Officer (CO) of a Federal agency
certifies that such a guarantee is necessary. Paragraph (e)(3) of
section 115.12 currently requires the CO's certification to include a
statement that the small business is experiencing difficulty obtaining
a bond and that an SBA bond guarantee would be in the best interests of
the Government. In response to comments received in response to the
ANPRM ((84 FR 25496), SBA proposed to streamline paragraph (e)(3) to
remove the requirement of this statement and require only that the CO
certify that the guarantee is necessary, which as noted above is the
standard set forth in the statute. SBA also proposed to update the
manner in which this certification may be submitted to SBA by providing
that it may be either express mailed to SBA, Office of Surety
Guarantees, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416, or submitted by
email to [email protected], along with additional information that
identifies the small business and the contract. SBA received two
comments from two national trade associations expressing support for
these changes, and 4 other comments expressing general support for the
proposed rule. SBA is adopting the changes as proposed.
Section 115.14. Paragraph (a) of this section provides that, if one
of the six events listed in paragraph (a) occurs under an SBA-
guaranteed bond, the Principal and its Affiliates lose eligibility for
further SBA bond guarantees. One such event, described in paragraph
(a)(3), is when the Surety has established a claim reserve for an SBA-
guaranteed bond of at least $1,000, an amount which was set by the SBG
Program in 1996. As SBA explained in the proposed rule, SBA considered
the purpose of this provision, which is to exclude Principals that have
demonstrated an unacceptable financial risk under a current SBA-
guaranteed bond from receiving future SBA bond guarantees and
determined that the $1,000 claim reserve threshold no longer reflects a
degree of financial risk that should trigger the Principal's
ineligibility for future SBA bond guarantees. After evaluating several
factors, including inflation since 1996, the increase in the maximum
contract amount for which SBA can issue a bond guarantee (from
$1,250,000 in 1996 to $6,500,000 today), and historical claim reserve
data, SBA proposed to increase the amount of the claim reserve that
would result in the Principal and its Affiliates losing eligibility for
further SBA bond guarantees from at least $1,000 to at least $10,000.
SBA received five comments in general support of this change, and SBA
is adopting this change as proposed.
Sections 115.19 and 115.64. Under Sec. 115.19(f)(1)(ii), SBA is
relieved of liability under the bond guarantee if the bond was executed
``after the work under the Contract had begun'' unless the Surety
submitted, and SBA executed, SBA Form 991, ``Surety Bond Guarantee
Agreement Addendum'' with the evidence and certifications required by
Sec. 115.19(f)(1)(ii). Paragraph (f)(2)(i) currently provides that
work under a contract is considered to have begun when a Principal
``takes any action at the job site which would have exposed the Surety
to liability under applicable law had a bond been Executed (or
approved, if the Surety is legally bound by such approval) at the
time.'' In addition, under 13 CFR 115.64, a Surety participating in the
Preferred Surety Bond Program (PSB Surety) is prohibited from executing
or approving a bond ``after commencement of work under a contract''
unless the Surety obtains written approval from the Director of Office
of Surety Guarantees (OSG). To apply for such approval, the Surety must
submit a completed SBA Form 991 with the evidence and certifications
required under Sec. 115.19(f)(1)(ii).
SBA proposed to clarify what constitutes ``commencement of work''
under Sec. 115.64 by amending both Sec. Sec. 115.19(f)(2)(i) and
115.64 to state that work under a contract is considered to have begun
or commenced when the contractor takes any action related to the
contract or bond that would have exposed its Surety to liability under
applicable law had a bond been executed (or approved, if the Surety is
legally bound by such approval) at the time. The work would not have to
occur ``at the job site'' to find that work has begun or commenced
under the contract. For example, SBA explained that work would be
deemed to have begun or commenced when the contractor takes any
financial action that would be typically covered under the bond, such
as purchasing supplies that will be used to complete the contract.
SBA received five comments expressing general support for this
change, and SBA is adopting the change as proposed.
Section 115.30. SBA proposed to revise the introductory language of
paragraph (d)(2) to increase the maximum amount of the contracts for
which a Prior Approval Surety would be permitted to use the Quick Bond
Guarantee Application and Agreement (SBA Form 990A) (Quick Bond
Application) from $400,000 to $500,000. As explained in the proposed
rule, SBA conducted a risk assessment, considered factors such as the
increasing average contract value, and considered the potential
decrease in overall application burden on small businesses. SBA
determined that increasing the maximum contract value for using the
Quick Bond Application would minimally increase program risk while
reducing costs to Sureties and small businesses by $36,343 per year. In
addition to reducing costs, SBA expressed hope that this change would
result in the additional benefit of increasing overall access to the
SBG Program.
SBA received three comments expressly supporting this change. A
commenter stated this change aligns with current surety industry
practices for quick/fast bond application limits. The commenter noted
that participating sureties may still want to review financial
information should a contractor have questionable credit history, and
SBA agrees that such review would be necessary to ensure that sureties
apply standards generally accepted by the surety industry for all of
its bonds, including its Quick Bond applications. The commenter stated
that the proposed change makes the approval process easier and faster
and provides greater opportunity for small businesses. Another
commenter stated that the increase will allow businesses with simple
accounting needs to pursue qualified work, and the third commenter
expressed general support for the change. SBA is adopting this change
as proposed.
[[Page 48082]]
In addition, SBA proposed to allow this streamlined form to be used
in additional circumstances. Paragraph (d)(2)(ii) lists the
circumstances under which the Quick Bond Application may not be used.
Under paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(D), the Quick Bond Application may not be
used if the contract includes a provision for liquidated damages that
exceeds $1,000 per day. In response to comments received in response to
the ANPRM, SBA proposed to increase this amount to $2,500 per day to
align with current industry standards. In response to the NPRM, SBA
received one comment suggesting that SBA consider using a sliding scale
approach based on contract size for liquidated damages instead of
increasing the maximum to $2,500 per day, stating that this approach
would align with surety industry practices. However, SBA does not agree
with creating a sliding scale based on contract sizes and believes that
SBA's approach of creating a maximum amount reduces program complexity
and provides clear guidelines allowing surety partners to easily assess
program requirements. In addition, SBA received 5 comments in response
to the ANPRM requesting that the maximum amount of liquidated damages
be set at $2,500. SBA is adopting this change as proposed.
In addition, paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(E) provides that the Quick Bond
Application may not be used for demolition contracts. As SBA explained
in the NPRM, SBA proposed, in response to comments received on the
ANPRM, to remove demolition contracts from the list of categories that
are excluded from using the Quick Bond Application. However, as stated
in the NPRM, SBA expects that Sureties will, in their underwriting,
ensure that the Principal has obtained any permit that is required for
demolition pursuant to Federal, State or local law and that SBA will
provide further guidance on the underwriting of demolition contracts in
its Standard Operating Procedures. SBA received five comments
expressing general support for this change, and SBA is adopting this
change as proposed.
Sections 115.32 and 115.67. Paragraph (d) of Sec. 115.32 governs
when a Prior Approval Surety must notify SBA of any increase or
decrease in the contract or bond amount. It also governs when any
increase or decrease in the Principal and Surety fees that results from
a change in the contract amount must be remitted to SBA by the
Principal or Surety or will be refunded by SBA. In addition, for the
PSB Program, Sec. 115.67(a) and (b) govern when any increase or
decrease in the Principal and Surety fees resulting from a change in
the contract amount must be remitted or will be refunded or adjusted.
Currently, the payment for any increase in either the Principal's or
the Surety's fee is due to SBA when the total amount of the change in
that fee equals or exceeds $40, and any decrease in the fee is refunded
to the Principal or rebated/adjusted to the Surety by SBA when the
total amount of the change in the fee equals or exceeds $40.
SBA proposed to revise Sec. Sec. 115.32(d) and 115.67 to increase
the threshold amount for when an increase in the Principal or Surety
fee would be due, or for when SBA would refund or rebate/adjust any
decrease in these fees, from $40 to $250. SBA received five comments
expressing general support of this change, with one commenter
suggesting that this increase will save the SBA money in the long run
by reducing the administrative costs involved in processing small
increases in contract amounts. SBA is adopting this change as proposed.
Section 115.33. Under this section, SBA may approve a surety
bonding line for a Prior Approval Surety under which the Surety may
execute multiple bonds for a specified small business. SBA proposed to
revise paragraph (d)(1), which addresses the form that must be
submitted for a Bid Bond executed under a bonding line, to remove the
reference to SBA Form 994B, ``Surety Bond Guarantee Underwriting
Review'', and replace it with SBA Form 990, ``Surety Bond Guarantee
Agreement''. SBA Form 990 is the agreement between SBA and the Surety
for SBA's guarantee of the bond and is, therefore, the appropriate form
for Sureties to submit for SBA approval of a bond under a bonding line.
There is no need to separately refer to SBA Form 994B in this
regulation because that form, as the Surety indicates in its
certification in SBA Form 990, is submitted with SBA Form 990 as a
supporting document. In addition, for Final Bonds executed under a
bonding line, paragraph (d)(2) of this section currently states that
the Surety is to submit both SBA Forms 990 and 994B to SBA for
approval. For consistency and for the same reasons described above, SBA
proposed to remove the reference to SBA Form 994B in paragraph (d)(2).
In response to the NPRM, SBA received five comments expressing general
support for these changes and SBA is adopting the changes as proposed.
Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13132, and 13563, the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808), the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C., Ch. 35), and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601-612)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this rule
does not constitute a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. This action does
not have preemptive effect or retroactive effect.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not have federalism implications as defined in
Executive Order 13132. It will not have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in the Executive Order. As
such it does not warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 13563
Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
(January 18, 2011), requires agencies to adopt regulations through a
process that involves public participation, and to the extent feasible,
base regulations on the open exchange of information and perspectives
from affected stakeholders and the public as a whole. As discussed
above, SBA published an ANPRM in the Federal Register (84 FR 25496) on
June 3, 2019 seeking input from the public in identifying regulations
under the SBG Program that affected parties believed should be
repealed, replaced, or modified because they are obsolete, unnecessary,
ineffective, or burdensome. SBA also solicited comments from the public
on how SBA can improve the surety bond products, procedures, forms, and
reporting requirements of the SBG Program. The comment period for the
ANPRM ended on August 2, 2019, and SBA considered the 54 comments
submitted by the public in response to prepare the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking published in the Federal Register on September 23, 2021 (86
FR 52844). Further, in issuing this final rule, SBA considered the 8
comments SBA received in response to
[[Page 48083]]
the request for comments on the proposed rule.
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this is not
a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., Ch. 35
SBA has determined that this final rule would not impose new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act. However, the rule will require a minor revision to SBA Form 990A,
Quick Bond Application (OMB Control No: 3245-0378), to conform to the
change in 13 CFR 115.30 increasing the maximum amount of the contracts
for which a Prior Approval Surety may use this streamlined application.
Revising the form to change the amount from $400,000 to $500,000 will
not have any impact on the burden for this information collection,
which is currently approved under OMB Control Number 3245-0378. OMB
approved SBA's request to make this non-substantive change to the form.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612
When an agency issues a final rule, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) requires the agency to ``prepare and make available for public
comment an initial regulatory flexibility analysis'' which will
``describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities.'' (5
U.S.C. 603(a)). However, section 605 of the RFA allows an agency to
certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an analysis, if the rulemaking is
not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
In the NPRM (86 FR 52844), SBA solicited comments from the public
to identify which of SBA's regulations relating to the SBG program
should be repealed, replaced, or modified because they are obsolete,
unnecessary, ineffective, or burdensome. SBA also solicited comments
from the public on how SBA can improve the surety bond products,
procedures, forms, and reporting requirements of the SBG Program. SBA's
proposed revisions in response to comments received are consistent with
these goals and with increasing the consistency of these regulations
with industry standards.
Under 13 CFR 115.11, Sureties participating in SBA's SBG Program
must be a corporation listed by the U.S. Treasury as eligible to issue
bonds in connection with Federal procurement contracts. There are 256
Treasury-listed Sureties, of which 41 are program partners in the SBG
Program. SBA estimates that 12 of these 41 Surety companies are small
under SBA's size standards. In addition, most small businesses that
receive an SBA-guaranteed bond operate within the 236220 NAICS industry
code (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction). According to
the U.S. Census Bureau, there are a total of 38,079 small business
companies that operate within the 236220 NAICS code, and SBA provided
guarantees in 2017 for 1,602 of these small businesses. Even if the
number of entities that may be affected by this rule is considered
significant, SBA has determined that the economic impact on these
entities would not be substantial. The rules would repeal, replace, or
modify obsolete or outdated SBG Program requirements that will have the
effect of reducing the burden on Sureties and small businesses that
receive bonds under the SBG Program. In addition, SBA anticipates that
the rules would streamline outdated procedures and increase small
business access to bond guarantees. Further, the rule would reduce
costs \1\ to Sureties and small businesses receiving an SBA-guaranteed
bond while any costs of adjustment to revisions are de minimis. Thus,
SBA does not expect that this rule would have a significant economic
impact on its program participants. Accordingly, the Administrator of
the SBA hereby certifies that this rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ An example is the reduction in cost mentioned in the
analysis of Sec. 115.30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 115
Claims, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses,
Surety bonds.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA amends 13 CFR part 115
as follows:
PART 115--SURETY BOND GUARANTEE
0
1. The authority citation for part 115 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. app 3; 15 U.S.C. 636i, 687b, 687c, 694a,
and 694b note.
0
2. Amend Sec. 115.10 by revising the definition of ``Contract'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 115.10 Definitions.
* * * * *
Contract means a written obligation of the Principal, including an
Order, requiring the furnishing of services, supplies, labor,
materials, machinery, equipment or construction. A Contract:
(1) Must not prohibit a Surety from performing the Contract upon
default of the Principal;
(2) Does not include a permit, subdivision contract, lease, land
contract, evidence of debt, financial guarantee (e.g., a contract
requiring any payment by the Principal to the Obligee, except for
contracts in connection with bid and performance bonds for the sale of
timber and/or other forest products, such as biomass, that require the
Principal to pay the Obligee), warranty of performance or efficiency,
warranty of fidelity, or release of lien (other than for claims under a
guaranteed bond); and
(3) May include a maintenance agreement under the following
circumstances:
(i) The maintenance agreement is ancillary to a Contract for which
SBA is guaranteeing a bond, is performed by the same Principal, is for
a period of 2 years or less, and only covers defective workmanship or
materials that are not covered by a manufacturer's warranty. With SBA's
prior written approval, the agreement may cover a period longer than 2
years, or cover something other than defective workmanship or
materials, if a longer period or something other than defective
workmanship or materials is customarily required in the relevant trade
or industry; or
(ii) The maintenance agreement is stand-alone and is entered into
in connection with a Contract for which a bond was not required and
only covers defective workmanship or materials that are not covered by
a manufacturer's warranty. The agreement must cover a period of 3 years
or less that begins immediately after the Contract is complete and must
be executed prior to the completion of the Contract. It must also be
entered into with the same Principal that completed the Contract. With
SBA's prior written approval, the agreement may cover a period longer
than 3 years if a longer period is customarily required in the relevant
trade or industry.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 115.12 by revising paragraph (e)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 115.12 General program policies and provisions.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) Federal Contracts or Orders in excess of $6,500,000 (as
adjusted for inflation in accordance with section 1908 of title 41,
United States Code). SBA is authorized to guarantee bonds
[[Page 48084]]
on Federal Contracts or Orders greater than $6,500,000 (as adjusted for
inflation in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908), but not exceeding
$10,000,000, upon a signed certification of a Federal contracting
officer that the SBA guarantee is necessary. The certification must be
either express mailed to SBA, Office of Surety Guarantees, 409 Third
Street SW, Washington, DC 20416 or sent by email to
[email protected], and include the following additional information:
(i) Name, address and telephone number of the small business;
(ii) Offer or Contract number and brief description of the
contract; and
(iii) Estimated Contract value and date of anticipated award
determination.
* * * * *
Sec. 115.14 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 115.14 in paragraph (a)(3) by removing ``$1000'' and
adding in its place ``$10,000''.
0
5. Amend Sec. 115.19 by revising paragraph (f)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 115.19 Denial of liability.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2)(i) For purposes of paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this section, work
under a Contract is considered to have begun when a Principal takes any
action related to the contract or bond that would have exposed its
Surety to liability under applicable law had a bond been Executed (or
approved, if the Surety is legally bound by such approval) at the time.
* * * * *
Sec. 115.30 [Amended]
0
6. Amend Sec. 115.30:
0
a. In paragraph (d)(2)(i) by removing ``$400,000'' and adding in its
place ``$500,000'';
0
b. In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(D) by removing ``$1,000'' and adding in its
place ``$2,500''; and
0
c. In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(E) by removing ``demolition,''.
Sec. 115.32 [Amended]
0
7. Amend Sec. 115.32 in paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) by removing ``$40''
wherever it appears and adding in its place ``$250''.
Sec. 115.33 [Amended]
0
8. Amend Sec. 115.33:
0
a. In paragraph (d)(1) by removing the phrase '' ``Surety Bond
Guarantee Underwriting Review'' (SBA Form 994B)'' and adding in its
place the phrase '' ``Surety Bond Guarantee Agreement'' (Form 990)'';
and
0
b. In paragraph (d)(2) by removing the phrase ``a Surety Bond Guarantee
Underwriting Review (SBA Form 994B) and'' in the first sentence, and
removing the phrase ``these forms'' in the second sentence and adding
in its place the phrase ``this form''.
0
9. Amend Sec. 115.64 by adding a new last sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 115.64 Timeliness requirement.
* * * For purposes of this section, work has commenced under a
Contract when a Principal takes any action related to the contract or
bond that would have exposed its Surety to liability under applicable
law had a bond been Executed (or approved, if the Surety is legally
bound by such approval) at the time.
Sec. 115.67 [Amended]
0
10. Amend Sec. 115.67 by removing ``$40'' wherever it appears and
adding in its place ``$250''.
Isabella Casillas Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-16875 Filed 8-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P