Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Intent To Renew Collection 3038-0111, Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants-Cross-Border Application of the Margin Requirements, 48001-48004 [2022-16774]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices Proposed addition to the Procurement List. ACTION: The Committee is proposing to add service(s) to the Procurement List that will be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities. DATES: Comments must be received on or before: September 04, 2022. ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC, 20024–3243. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or to submit comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785–6404, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions. SUMMARY: Additions If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to procure the service(s) listed below from nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities. The following service(s) are proposed for addition to the Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed: Service(s) Service Type: Janitorial Service Mandatory for: FAA, Charlotte Air Traffic Control Tower, TRACON and Base Building, Charlotte, NC Designated Source of Supply: OE Enterprises, Inc., Hillsborough, NC Contracting Activity: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 697DCK REGIONAL ACQUISITIONS SVCS Michael R. Jurkowski, Acting Director, Business Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–16817 Filed 8–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6353–01–P Procurement List; Deletions Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled. ACTION: Deletions from the Procurement List. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 AGENCY: This action deletes service(s) from the Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20024–3243. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785–6404, or email CMTEFedReg@ AbilityOne.gov. ADDRESSES: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Deletions On 9/24/2021; 11/26/2021; 4/8/2022; 4/15/2022; and 5/13/2022, the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed deletions from the Procurement List. This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. After consideration of the relevant matter presented, the Committee has determined that the product(s) and service(s) listed below are no longer suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 8501–8506 and 41 CFR 51–2.4. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification I certify that the following action will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors considered for this certification were: 1. The action will not result in additional reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities. 2. The action may result in authorizing small entities to furnish the product(s) and service(s) to the Government. 3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would accomplish the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501–8506) in connection with the product(s) and service(s) deleted from the Procurement List. Service Type: Custodial and Related Services Mandatory for: GSA PBS Region 3, Summersville Federal Building & Post Office, 449 Water Street, Summersville, WV Designated Source of Supply: The Sheltered Workshop of Nicholas County, Inc., Craigsville, WV Contracting Activity: PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE, PBS R3 Service Type: Custodial service Mandatory for: TSA, Central Illinois Regional Airport, Bloomington, IL, Airport Business Center, Bloomington, IL Contracting Activity: PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION Service Type: Janitorial/Custodial Mandatory for: Air Traffic Control Tower: 6100 E.M. Dirksen Street, Peoria, IL Designated Source of Supply: Community Workshop and Training Center, Inc., Peoria, IL Contracting Activity: TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF, DEPT OF TRANS Service Type: Janitorial/Custodial Mandatory for: US Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, Basking Ridge, NJ, 241 Pleasant Plains Road, Basking Ridge, NJ Designated Source of Supply: Employment Horizons, Inc., Cedar Knolls, NJ Contracting Activity: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CONTRACTING AND GENERAL SERVICES DIV Michael R. Jurkowski, Acting Director, Business Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–16818 Filed 8–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6353–01–P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Intent To Renew Collection 3038–0111, Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants—Cross-Border Application of the Margin Requirements Commodity Futures Trading Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) is announcing an Accordingly, the following service(s) opportunity for public comment on the are deleted from the Procurement List: proposed renewal of a collection of Service(s) certain information by the agency. Service Type: Administrative/General Under the Paperwork Reduction Act Support Services (‘‘PRA’’), Federal agencies are required Mandatory for: Department of Justice, Federal to publish notice in the Federal Register Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional concerning each proposed collection of Institution, Cumberland, MD information, including each proposed Designated Source of Supply: Columbia extension of an existing collection of Lighthouse for the Blind, Washington, information, and to allow 60 days for DC public comment. This notice solicits Contracting Activity: FEDERAL PRISON comments on the burdens associated SYSTEM, TERMINAL ISLAND, FCI SUMMARY: End of Certification COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED SUMMARY: employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities. DATES: Date added to and deleted from the Procurement List: September 04, 2022 48001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 48002 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices with the following aspects of the Commission’s Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants—Cross-Border Application of the Margin Requirements (‘‘Final Rule’’): (1) requesting a comparability determination from the Commission; (2) maintaining policies and procedures for compliance with the Commission’s special provisions for non-netting jurisdictions and nonsegregation jurisdictions; and (3) maintaining books and records properly documenting that all of the requirements of the special provisions for non-netting jurisdictions and nonsegregation jurisdictions are satisfied. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 4, 2022. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ‘‘Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants—Cross-Border Application of the Margin Requirements,’’ Collection Number 3038–0111, by any of the following methods: • The Agency’s website, at https:// comments.cftc.gov/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments through the website. • Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581. • Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as ‘‘Mail’’ above. Please submit your comments using only one method. All comments must be submitted in English, or if not, accompanied by an English translation. Comments will be posted as received to https://www.cftc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dina Moussa, Attorney Advisor, Market Participants Division, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, (202) 418–5696 or dmoussa@cftc.gov, and refer to OMB Control No. 3038–0111. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of Information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3 and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, the CFTC is publishing notice of the proposed extension of the existing collections of information listed below. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Title: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants—Cross-Border Application of the Margin Requirements (OMB Control No. 3038–0111). This is a request for an extension of currently approved information collections. Abstract: Section 731 of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,1 amended the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’), 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq., to add, as Section 4s(e) thereof, provisions concerning the setting of initial and variation margin requirements for swap dealers (‘‘SDs’’) and major swap participants (‘‘MSPs’’).2 Each SD and MSP for which there is a Prudential Regulator, as defined in Section 1a(39) of the CEA,3 must meet margin requirements established by the applicable Prudential Regulator, and each SD and MSP for which there is no Prudential Regulator (‘‘Covered Swap Entities’’ or ‘‘CSEs’’) must comply with the Commission’s Regulations governing margin on all swaps that are not centrally cleared. With regard to the cross-border application of the Commission’s margin rules, Section 2(i) 4 of the CEA provides the Commission with express authority over activities outside the United States relating to swaps when certain conditions are met. Section 2(i) of the CEA provides that the provisions of the CEA relating to swaps that were enacted by the Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 (including any rule prescribed or regulation promulgated under that Act), shall not apply to activities outside the United States unless those activities (1) have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, commerce of the United States or (2) contravene such rules or regulations as the Commission may prescribe or promulgate as are necessary or appropriate to prevent the evasion of any provision of the CEA that was enacted by the Wall Street 1 Public Law 111–023, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). U.S.C. 6s(e). 3 7 U.S.C. 1a(39). 4 7 U.S.C. 2(i). 27 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010. On May 31, 2016, the Commission published the Final Rule addressing the cross-border application of its margin requirements for uncleared swaps applicable to CSEs.5 The Final Rule contains a collection of information under Commission Regulation 23.160(c) regarding requests for comparability determinations, and information collections regarding non-netting jurisdictions,6 and non-segregation jurisdictions.7 Under Commission Regulation 23.160(c)(1), a CSE that is eligible for substituted compliance or a foreign regulatory agency that has direct supervisory authority over one or more CSEs and that is responsible for administering the relevant foreign jurisdiction’s margin requirements may request, individually or collectively, that the Commission make a determination that a CSE that complies with margin requirements in the relevant foreign jurisdiction would be deemed to be in compliance with the Commission’s corresponding margin rule (a ‘‘comparability determination’’). Once a comparability determination is made for a jurisdiction, it applies for all entities or transactions in that jurisdiction to the extent provided in the comparability determination, as approved by the Commission and subject to any conditions specified by the Commission. All CSEs, regardless of whether they rely on a comparability determination, remain subject to the Commission’s examination and enforcement authority. Commission Regulation 23.160(c)(2) requires that applicants for a comparability determination provide copies of the relevant foreign jurisdiction’s margin requirements and descriptions of their objectives, how they differ from the margin policy framework for non-cleared, bilateral derivatives set forth by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the International Organization of 5 81 FR 34818 (May 31, 2016). used in the adopting release, a ‘‘non-netting jurisdiction’’ is a jurisdiction in which a CSE cannot conclude, with a well-founded basis, that the netting agreement with a counterparty in that foreign jurisdiction meets the definition of an ‘‘eligible master netting agreement’’ set forth in Commission Regulation 23.151, and as described in Section II.B.5.b of the adopting release. 7 As used in the adopting release, a ‘‘nonsegregation jurisdiction’’ is a jurisdiction where inherent limitations in the legal or operational infrastructure of the foreign jurisdiction make it impracticable for the CSE and its counterparty to post initial margin pursuant to custodial arrangements that comply with the Commission’s margin rules, as further described in Section II.B.4.b of the adopting release. 6 As E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices Securities Commissions, and how they address the elements of the Commission’s margin requirements. The applicant must identify the specific legal and regulatory provisions of the foreign jurisdiction’s margin requirements that correspond to each element and, if necessary, whether the relevant foreign jurisdiction’s margin requirements do not address a particular element. Commission Regulation 23.160(d) includes a special provision for nonnetting jurisdictions. This provision allows CSEs that cannot conclude after sufficient legal review with a wellfounded basis that the netting agreement with a counterparty in a foreign jurisdiction meets the definition of an ‘‘eligible master netting agreement’’ set forth in Commission Regulation 23.151 to nevertheless net uncleared swaps in determining the amount of margin that they post, provided that certain conditions are met. In order to avail itself of this special provision, a CSE must treat the uncleared swaps covered by the agreement on a gross basis in determining the amount of initial and variation margin that it must collect, but may net those uncleared swaps in determining the amount of initial and variation margin it must post to the counterparty, in accordance with the netting provisions of Commission Regulations 23.152(c) and 23.153(d). A CSE that enters into uncleared swaps in ‘‘non-netting’’ jurisdictions in reliance on this provision must have policies and procedures ensuring that it complies with the special provision’s requirements, and maintain books and records properly documenting that all of the requirements of this exception are satisfied. Commission Regulation 23.160(e) includes a special provision for nonsegregation jurisdictions that allows non-U.S. CSEs that are Foreign Consolidated Subsidiaries (‘‘FCS’’) (as defined in Commission Regulation 23.160(a)(1)) and foreign branches of U.S. CSEs to engage in swaps in foreign jurisdictions where inherent limitations in the legal or operational infrastructure make it impracticable for the CSE and its counterparty to post collateral in compliance with the custodial arrangement requirements of the Commission’s margin rules, subject to certain conditions. In order to rely on this special provision, a FCS or foreign branch of a U.S. CSE is required to satisfy all of the conditions of the rule, including that (1) inherent limitations in the legal or operational infrastructure of the foreign jurisdiction make it impracticable for the CSE and its counterparty to post any form of eligible VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 initial margin collateral for the uncleared swap pursuant to custodial arrangements that comply with the Commission’s margin rules; (2) foreign regulatory restrictions require the CSE to transact in uncleared swaps with the counterparty through an establishment within the foreign jurisdiction and do not permit the posting of collateral for the swap in compliance with the custodial arrangements of Commission Regulation 23.157 in the United States or a jurisdiction for which the Commission has issued a comparability determination under Commission Regulation 23.160(c) with respect to Commission Regulation 23.157; (3) the CSE’s counterparty is not a U.S. person and is not a CSE, and the counterparty’s obligations under the uncleared swap are not guaranteed by a U.S. person; (4) the CSE collects initial margin in cash on a gross basis, and posts and collects variation margin in cash, in accordance with specific requirements; (5) for each broad risk category, as set out in Commission Regulation 23.154(b)(2)(v), the total outstanding notional value of all uncleared swaps in that broad risk category, as to which the CSE is relying on under Commission Regulation 23.160(e), may not exceed 5 percent of the CSE’s total outstanding notional value for all uncleared swaps in the same broad risk category; (6) the CSE has policies and procedures ensuring that it is in compliance with the requirements of this provision; and (7) the CSE maintains books and records properly documenting that all of the requirements of this provision are satisfied. With respect to the collection of information, the CFTC invites comments on: • Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information will have a practical use; • The accuracy of the Commission’s estimate of the burdens of the proposed collections of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Ways to minimize the burdens of collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. If you wish the Commission to PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48003 consider information that you believe is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, a petition for confidential treatment of the exempt information may be submitted according to the procedures established in § 145.9 of the Commission’s Regulations.8 The Commission reserves the right, but shall have no obligation, to review, pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or remove any or all of your submission from https://www.cftc.gov that it may deem to be inappropriate for publication, such as obscene language. All submissions that have been redacted or removed that contain comments on the merits of the information collection requests will be retained in the public comment file and will be considered as required under the Administrative Procedure Act and other applicable laws, and may be accessible under the Freedom of Information Act. Burden Statement—Information Collection for Comparability Determinations: The Commission estimates that approximately 53 CSEs may request a comparability determination pursuant to Commission Regulation 23.160(c).9 The Commission notes that any foreign regulatory agency that has direct supervisory authority over one or more CSEs and that is responsible for administering the relevant foreign jurisdiction’s margin requirements may also apply for a comparability determination. However, once a comparability determination is made for a jurisdiction, it will apply for all entities or transactions in that jurisdiction to the extent provided in the determination, as approved by the Commission. To date, the Commission has issued a comparability determination for 3 jurisdictions.10 Accordingly, the Commission estimates that it will receive requests from the 13 8 17 CFR 145.9. there are approximately 108 swap entities provisionally registered with the Commission. The Commission estimates that of the approximately 108 swap entities that are provisionally registered, approximately 53 are CSEs for which there is no Prudential Regulator, and are therefore subject to the Commission’s margin rules. 10 See Comparability Determination for Japan: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 81 FR 63376 (Sep. 15, 2016); Comparability Determination for the European Union: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 82 FR 48394 (Oct. 18, 2017); and Comparability Determination for Australia: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 84 FR 12908 (Apr. 3, 2019). The Commission subsequently amended its comparability determination for Japan. See Amendment to Comparability Determination for Japan: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 84 FR 12074 (Apr. 1, 2019). 9 Currently, E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 48004 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 remaining jurisdictions within the G20,11 in addition to Switzerland. The number of burden hours associated with such requests is estimated to be 40 hours. Accordingly, the respondent burden for this collection is estimated to be as follows: Estimated Number of Respondents: 14. Estimated Average Burden Hours per Respondent: 40. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 560. Frequency of Collection: Once. There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection. Burden Statement—Information Collection for Non-Netting Jurisdictions: The Commission is revising its estimate of the burden for this collection to reflect the current number of registrants subject to the Commission’s margin requirements for uncleared swaps. Specifically, the Commission estimates that approximately 53 CSEs may rely on Commission Regulation 23.160(d).12 Furthermore, the Commission estimates that these CSEs would incur an average of 10 annual burden hours to maintain books and records properly documenting that all of the requirements of this exception are satisfied (including policies and procedures ensuring compliance). Accordingly, the respondent burden for this collection is estimated to be as follows: Estimated Number of Respondents: 53. Estimated Average Burden Hours per Respondent: 10. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 530. Frequency of Collection: Once; As needed. There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection. Burden Statement—Information Collection for Non-Segregation Jurisdictions: The Commission estimates that there are eight jurisdictions for which the first two conditions specified above for nonsegregation jurisdictions are satisfied and where FCSs and foreign branches of U.S. CSEs that are subject to the Commission’s margin rules may engage in swaps. The Commission estimates 11 The Group of 20 (‘‘G20’’) is comprised of foreign leaders and central bank managers from the top 19 countries with the largest economies along with the European Union. 12 See n.9, supra. Because all of these CSEs are eligible to use the special provision for non-netting jurisdictions, the Commission estimates that 53 CSEs may rely on Commission Regulation 23.160(d). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 that approximately 12 FCSs or foreign branches of U.S. CSEs may rely on Commission Regulation 23.160(e) in some or all of these jurisdictions. The Commission estimates that each FCS or foreign branch of a U.S. CSE relying on this provision would incur an average of 20 annual burden hours to maintain books and records properly documenting that all of the requirements of this provision are satisfied (including policies and procedures for ensuring compliance) with respect to each jurisdiction as to which they rely on the special provision. Thus, based on the estimate of eight non-segregation jurisdictions, the Commission estimates that each of the approximately 12 FCSs and foreign branches of U.S. CSEs that may rely on this provision will incur an estimated 160 average burden hours per year (i.e., 20 average burden hours per jurisdiction multiplied by 8). Accordingly, the respondent burden for this collection is estimated to be as follows: Estimated Number of Respondents: 12. Estimated Average Burden Hours per Respondent: 160. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,920. Frequency of Collection: Once; As needed. There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection. agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written request with the Office of the Secretary by August 22, 2022. ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement should send written comments to Comment 22–C0003, Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: (240) 863–8938 (mobile), (301) 504–7479 (office); email: cpsc-os@cpsc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalee Thomas, Trial Attorney, Division of Enforcement and Litigation, Office of Compliance and Field Operations, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408; rbthomas@cpsc.gov or 301–504–7656. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission voted (4–0–1) to provisionally accept the proposed Settlement Agreement and Order pertaining to The TJX Companies, Inc. Chair Hoehn-Saric, Commissioners Baiocco, Trumka and Boyle voted to provisionally accept the Settlement Agreement and Order. Commissioner Feldman voted to take other action. The text of the Agreement and Order appears below. (Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) United States of America Consumer Product Safety Commission In the Matter of: The TJX Companies, Inc., CPSC Docket No. 22–C0003 Dated: August 1, 2022. Robert Sidman, Deputy Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–16774 Filed 8–4–22; 8:45 am] Dated: August 2, 2022. Alberta E. Mills, Secretary. Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Notice. Settlement Agreement 1. In accordance with the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051¥2089 (‘‘CPSA’’) and 16 CFR 1118.20, The TJX Companies, Inc. (‘‘TJX’’), and the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’), through its staff, hereby enter into this Settlement Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’). The Agreement and the incorporated attached Order resolve staff’s charges set forth below. The Commission publishes in the Federal Register any settlement that it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act. Published below is a provisionally accepted Settlement Agreement with The TJX Companies, Inc., containing a civil penalty in the amount of $13 million, subject to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement. DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this The Parties 2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency, established pursuant to, and responsible for, the enforcement of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051¥2089. By executing the Agreement, staff is acting on behalf of the Commission, pursuant to 16 CFR 1118.20(b). The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the CPSA. 3. TJX is a corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the state of BILLING CODE 6351–01–P CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION [CPSC Docket No. 22–C0003] The TJX Companies, Inc. AGENCY: SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 150 (Friday, August 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48001-48004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16774]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Intent To 
Renew Collection 3038-0111, Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for 
Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants--Cross-Border Application of 
the Margin Requirements

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'' or 
``Commission'') is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the 
proposed renewal of a collection of certain information by the agency. 
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA''), Federal agencies are 
required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each 
proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension 
of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for 
public comment. This notice solicits comments on the burdens associated

[[Page 48002]]

with the following aspects of the Commission's Margin Requirements for 
Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants--Cross-
Border Application of the Margin Requirements (``Final Rule''): (1) 
requesting a comparability determination from the Commission; (2) 
maintaining policies and procedures for compliance with the 
Commission's special provisions for non-netting jurisdictions and non-
segregation jurisdictions; and (3) maintaining books and records 
properly documenting that all of the requirements of the special 
provisions for non-netting jurisdictions and non-segregation 
jurisdictions are satisfied.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 4, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``Margin Requirements 
for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants--
Cross-Border Application of the Margin Requirements,'' Collection 
Number 3038-0111, by any of the following methods:
     The Agency's website, at https://comments.cftc.gov/. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments through the website.
     Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the 
Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette 
Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as ``Mail'' above.
    Please submit your comments using only one method. All comments 
must be submitted in English, or if not, accompanied by an English 
translation. Comments will be posted as received to https://www.cftc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dina Moussa, Attorney Advisor, Market 
Participants Division, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, (202) 418-
5696 or [email protected], and refer to OMB Control No. 3038-0111.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., 
Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and 
Budget (``OMB'') for each collection of information they conduct or 
sponsor. ``Collection of Information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) 
and 5 CFR 1320.3 and includes agency requests or requirements that 
members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide 
information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day 
notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of 
information, including each proposed extension of an existing 
collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for 
approval. To comply with this requirement, the CFTC is publishing 
notice of the proposed extension of the existing collections of 
information listed below. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Title: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and 
Major Swap Participants--Cross-Border Application of the Margin 
Requirements (OMB Control No. 3038-0111). This is a request for an 
extension of currently approved information collections.
    Abstract: Section 731 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act,\1\ amended the Commodity Exchange Act 
(``CEA''), 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq., to add, as Section 4s(e) thereof, 
provisions concerning the setting of initial and variation margin 
requirements for swap dealers (``SDs'') and major swap participants 
(``MSPs'').\2\ Each SD and MSP for which there is a Prudential 
Regulator, as defined in Section 1a(39) of the CEA,\3\ must meet margin 
requirements established by the applicable Prudential Regulator, and 
each SD and MSP for which there is no Prudential Regulator (``Covered 
Swap Entities'' or ``CSEs'') must comply with the Commission's 
Regulations governing margin on all swaps that are not centrally 
cleared.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Public Law 111-023, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
    \2\ 7 U.S.C. 6s(e).
    \3\ 7 U.S.C. 1a(39).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With regard to the cross-border application of the Commission's 
margin rules, Section 2(i) \4\ of the CEA provides the Commission with 
express authority over activities outside the United States relating to 
swaps when certain conditions are met. Section 2(i) of the CEA provides 
that the provisions of the CEA relating to swaps that were enacted by 
the Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 (including 
any rule prescribed or regulation promulgated under that Act), shall 
not apply to activities outside the United States unless those 
activities (1) have a direct and significant connection with activities 
in, or effect on, commerce of the United States or (2) contravene such 
rules or regulations as the Commission may prescribe or promulgate as 
are necessary or appropriate to prevent the evasion of any provision of 
the CEA that was enacted by the Wall Street Transparency and 
Accountability Act of 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 7 U.S.C. 2(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 31, 2016, the Commission published the Final Rule addressing 
the cross-border application of its margin requirements for uncleared 
swaps applicable to CSEs.\5\ The Final Rule contains a collection of 
information under Commission Regulation 23.160(c) regarding requests 
for comparability determinations, and information collections regarding 
non-netting jurisdictions,\6\ and non-segregation jurisdictions.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 81 FR 34818 (May 31, 2016).
    \6\ As used in the adopting release, a ``non-netting 
jurisdiction'' is a jurisdiction in which a CSE cannot conclude, 
with a well-founded basis, that the netting agreement with a 
counterparty in that foreign jurisdiction meets the definition of an 
``eligible master netting agreement'' set forth in Commission 
Regulation 23.151, and as described in Section II.B.5.b of the 
adopting release.
    \7\ As used in the adopting release, a ``non-segregation 
jurisdiction'' is a jurisdiction where inherent limitations in the 
legal or operational infrastructure of the foreign jurisdiction make 
it impracticable for the CSE and its counterparty to post initial 
margin pursuant to custodial arrangements that comply with the 
Commission's margin rules, as further described in Section II.B.4.b 
of the adopting release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under Commission Regulation 23.160(c)(1), a CSE that is eligible 
for substituted compliance or a foreign regulatory agency that has 
direct supervisory authority over one or more CSEs and that is 
responsible for administering the relevant foreign jurisdiction's 
margin requirements may request, individually or collectively, that the 
Commission make a determination that a CSE that complies with margin 
requirements in the relevant foreign jurisdiction would be deemed to be 
in compliance with the Commission's corresponding margin rule (a 
``comparability determination''). Once a comparability determination is 
made for a jurisdiction, it applies for all entities or transactions in 
that jurisdiction to the extent provided in the comparability 
determination, as approved by the Commission and subject to any 
conditions specified by the Commission. All CSEs, regardless of whether 
they rely on a comparability determination, remain subject to the 
Commission's examination and enforcement authority.
    Commission Regulation 23.160(c)(2) requires that applicants for a 
comparability determination provide copies of the relevant foreign 
jurisdiction's margin requirements and descriptions of their 
objectives, how they differ from the margin policy framework for non-
cleared, bilateral derivatives set forth by the Basel Committee on 
Banking Supervision and the International Organization of

[[Page 48003]]

Securities Commissions, and how they address the elements of the 
Commission's margin requirements. The applicant must identify the 
specific legal and regulatory provisions of the foreign jurisdiction's 
margin requirements that correspond to each element and, if necessary, 
whether the relevant foreign jurisdiction's margin requirements do not 
address a particular element.
    Commission Regulation 23.160(d) includes a special provision for 
non-netting jurisdictions. This provision allows CSEs that cannot 
conclude after sufficient legal review with a well-founded basis that 
the netting agreement with a counterparty in a foreign jurisdiction 
meets the definition of an ``eligible master netting agreement'' set 
forth in Commission Regulation 23.151 to nevertheless net uncleared 
swaps in determining the amount of margin that they post, provided that 
certain conditions are met. In order to avail itself of this special 
provision, a CSE must treat the uncleared swaps covered by the 
agreement on a gross basis in determining the amount of initial and 
variation margin that it must collect, but may net those uncleared 
swaps in determining the amount of initial and variation margin it must 
post to the counterparty, in accordance with the netting provisions of 
Commission Regulations 23.152(c) and 23.153(d). A CSE that enters into 
uncleared swaps in ``non-netting'' jurisdictions in reliance on this 
provision must have policies and procedures ensuring that it complies 
with the special provision's requirements, and maintain books and 
records properly documenting that all of the requirements of this 
exception are satisfied.
    Commission Regulation 23.160(e) includes a special provision for 
non-segregation jurisdictions that allows non-U.S. CSEs that are 
Foreign Consolidated Subsidiaries (``FCS'') (as defined in Commission 
Regulation 23.160(a)(1)) and foreign branches of U.S. CSEs to engage in 
swaps in foreign jurisdictions where inherent limitations in the legal 
or operational infrastructure make it impracticable for the CSE and its 
counterparty to post collateral in compliance with the custodial 
arrangement requirements of the Commission's margin rules, subject to 
certain conditions. In order to rely on this special provision, a FCS 
or foreign branch of a U.S. CSE is required to satisfy all of the 
conditions of the rule, including that (1) inherent limitations in the 
legal or operational infrastructure of the foreign jurisdiction make it 
impracticable for the CSE and its counterparty to post any form of 
eligible initial margin collateral for the uncleared swap pursuant to 
custodial arrangements that comply with the Commission's margin rules; 
(2) foreign regulatory restrictions require the CSE to transact in 
uncleared swaps with the counterparty through an establishment within 
the foreign jurisdiction and do not permit the posting of collateral 
for the swap in compliance with the custodial arrangements of 
Commission Regulation 23.157 in the United States or a jurisdiction for 
which the Commission has issued a comparability determination under 
Commission Regulation 23.160(c) with respect to Commission Regulation 
23.157; (3) the CSE's counterparty is not a U.S. person and is not a 
CSE, and the counterparty's obligations under the uncleared swap are 
not guaranteed by a U.S. person; (4) the CSE collects initial margin in 
cash on a gross basis, and posts and collects variation margin in cash, 
in accordance with specific requirements; (5) for each broad risk 
category, as set out in Commission Regulation 23.154(b)(2)(v), the 
total outstanding notional value of all uncleared swaps in that broad 
risk category, as to which the CSE is relying on under Commission 
Regulation 23.160(e), may not exceed 5 percent of the CSE's total 
outstanding notional value for all uncleared swaps in the same broad 
risk category; (6) the CSE has policies and procedures ensuring that it 
is in compliance with the requirements of this provision; and (7) the 
CSE maintains books and records properly documenting that all of the 
requirements of this provision are satisfied.
    With respect to the collection of information, the CFTC invites 
comments on:
     Whether the proposed collections of information are 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the 
Commission, including whether the information will have a practical 
use;
     The accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens 
of the proposed collections of information, including the validity of 
the methodology and assumptions used;
     Ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of 
the information to be collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burdens of collection of information 
on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting 
electronic submission of responses.
    You should submit only information that you wish to make available 
publicly. If you wish the Commission to consider information that you 
believe is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 
a petition for confidential treatment of the exempt information may be 
submitted according to the procedures established in Sec.  145.9 of the 
Commission's Regulations.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 145.9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission reserves the right, but shall have no obligation, to 
review, pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or remove any or all of your 
submission from https://www.cftc.gov that it may deem to be 
inappropriate for publication, such as obscene language. All 
submissions that have been redacted or removed that contain comments on 
the merits of the information collection requests will be retained in 
the public comment file and will be considered as required under the 
Administrative Procedure Act and other applicable laws, and may be 
accessible under the Freedom of Information Act.
    Burden Statement--Information Collection for Comparability 
Determinations:
    The Commission estimates that approximately 53 CSEs may request a 
comparability determination pursuant to Commission Regulation 
23.160(c).\9\ The Commission notes that any foreign regulatory agency 
that has direct supervisory authority over one or more CSEs and that is 
responsible for administering the relevant foreign jurisdiction's 
margin requirements may also apply for a comparability determination. 
However, once a comparability determination is made for a jurisdiction, 
it will apply for all entities or transactions in that jurisdiction to 
the extent provided in the determination, as approved by the 
Commission. To date, the Commission has issued a comparability 
determination for 3 jurisdictions.\10\ Accordingly, the Commission 
estimates that it will receive requests from the 13

[[Page 48004]]

remaining jurisdictions within the G20,\11\ in addition to Switzerland. 
The number of burden hours associated with such requests is estimated 
to be 40 hours. Accordingly, the respondent burden for this collection 
is estimated to be as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Currently, there are approximately 108 swap entities 
provisionally registered with the Commission. The Commission 
estimates that of the approximately 108 swap entities that are 
provisionally registered, approximately 53 are CSEs for which there 
is no Prudential Regulator, and are therefore subject to the 
Commission's margin rules.
    \10\ See Comparability Determination for Japan: Margin 
Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap 
Participants, 81 FR 63376 (Sep. 15, 2016); Comparability 
Determination for the European Union: Margin Requirements for 
Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 82 FR 
48394 (Oct. 18, 2017); and Comparability Determination for 
Australia: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers 
and Major Swap Participants, 84 FR 12908 (Apr. 3, 2019). The 
Commission subsequently amended its comparability determination for 
Japan. See Amendment to Comparability Determination for Japan: 
Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major 
Swap Participants, 84 FR 12074 (Apr. 1, 2019).
    \11\ The Group of 20 (``G20'') is comprised of foreign leaders 
and central bank managers from the top 19 countries with the largest 
economies along with the European Union.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Number of Respondents: 14.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours per Respondent: 40.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 560.
    Frequency of Collection: Once.
    There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs 
associated with this collection.
    Burden Statement--Information Collection for Non-Netting 
Jurisdictions:
    The Commission is revising its estimate of the burden for this 
collection to reflect the current number of registrants subject to the 
Commission's margin requirements for uncleared swaps. Specifically, the 
Commission estimates that approximately 53 CSEs may rely on Commission 
Regulation 23.160(d).\12\ Furthermore, the Commission estimates that 
these CSEs would incur an average of 10 annual burden hours to maintain 
books and records properly documenting that all of the requirements of 
this exception are satisfied (including policies and procedures 
ensuring compliance). Accordingly, the respondent burden for this 
collection is estimated to be as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See n.9, supra. Because all of these CSEs are eligible to 
use the special provision for non-netting jurisdictions, the 
Commission estimates that 53 CSEs may rely on Commission Regulation 
23.160(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Number of Respondents: 53.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours per Respondent: 10.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 530.
    Frequency of Collection: Once; As needed.
    There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs 
associated with this collection.
    Burden Statement--Information Collection for Non-Segregation 
Jurisdictions:
    The Commission estimates that there are eight jurisdictions for 
which the first two conditions specified above for non-segregation 
jurisdictions are satisfied and where FCSs and foreign branches of U.S. 
CSEs that are subject to the Commission's margin rules may engage in 
swaps. The Commission estimates that approximately 12 FCSs or foreign 
branches of U.S. CSEs may rely on Commission Regulation 23.160(e) in 
some or all of these jurisdictions. The Commission estimates that each 
FCS or foreign branch of a U.S. CSE relying on this provision would 
incur an average of 20 annual burden hours to maintain books and 
records properly documenting that all of the requirements of this 
provision are satisfied (including policies and procedures for ensuring 
compliance) with respect to each jurisdiction as to which they rely on 
the special provision. Thus, based on the estimate of eight non-
segregation jurisdictions, the Commission estimates that each of the 
approximately 12 FCSs and foreign branches of U.S. CSEs that may rely 
on this provision will incur an estimated 160 average burden hours per 
year (i.e., 20 average burden hours per jurisdiction multiplied by 8). 
Accordingly, the respondent burden for this collection is estimated to 
be as follows:
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 12.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours per Respondent: 160.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,920.
    Frequency of Collection: Once; As needed.
    There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs 
associated with this collection.

(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)

    Dated: August 1, 2022.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-16774 Filed 8-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.