Safety Zone; Firework Event, Willamette River, Portland, OR, 47659-47661 [2022-16670]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 149 / Thursday, August 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules
However, in the event the market is
distorted by disruption to supply or
other factors, DOE may defer scheduled
deliveries or consider deferral requests
from awardees.
(2) An awardee seeking to defer
scheduled deliveries of petroleum
products to the SPR may submit a
deferral request to DOE.
(b) Deferral criteria. DOE shall only
grant a deferral request for negotiation
under paragraph (c) of this section if it
determines that DOE can receive a
premium for the deferral and, based on
DOE’s deferral analysis, that at least one
of the following conditions exists:
(1) DOE can reduce the cost of its
petroleum products acquisition per
barrel and increase the volume of
petroleum products being delivered to
the SPR by means of the premium
barrels required by the deferral process;
(2) DOE anticipates private
inventories are approaching a point
where unscheduled outages may occur;
(3) There is evidence that refineries
are reducing their run rates for lack of
feedstock; or
(4) There is an unanticipated
disruption to petroleum product supply.
(c) Negotiating terms.
(1) If DOE decides to negotiate a
deferral of deliveries, DOE shall
estimate the market value of the deferral
and establish a strategy for negotiating
with suppliers the minimum percentage
of the market value to be taken by the
Government. During these negotiations,
if the deferral request was initiated by
DOE, DOE may consider any reasonable,
customary, and applicable costs already
incurred by the supplier in the
performance of a valid contract for
delivery. In no event shall such
consideration account for any
consequential damages or lost profits
suffered by the supplier as a result of
such deferral.
(2) DOE shall only agree to amend the
contract if the negotiation results in an
agreement to give the Government a fair
and reasonable share of the market
value.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 626.9 Suspension and pre-drawdown
diversion.
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Aug 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2022–0641]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Firework Event,
Willamette River, Portland, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Willamette River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable
waters between the Marquam Bridge to
Hawthorne Bridge, Portland, Oregon,
during a fireworks display on the
evening of September 3, 2022. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Columbia River or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2022–0641 using the Federal Decision
Making Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LT Sean
Murphy, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–
9319, email D13-SMBMSUPortlandWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
Where the Secretary has found that a
severe energy supply interruption may
be imminent, the Secretary may
suspend any previously announced or
contracted acquisition of any petroleum
product by the SPR or injection of
petroleum products into the SPR; or sell
any petroleum product acquired for
injection into the SPR that has not yet
been injected into the SPR.
[FR Doc. 2022–16081 Filed 8–3–22; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Columbia River
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On July 19, 2022, the Oregon
Symphony notified the Coast Guard that
it will be conducting a fireworks display
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47659
from 9 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on September
3, 2022. The fireworks are to be
launched from a barge in the Willamette
River between Marquam Bridge and
Hawthorne Bridge, Portland, Oregon.
Hazards from firework displays include
accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles, and falling hot
embers or other debris. The Captain of
the Port Columbia River (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the fireworks to be used
in this display would be a safety
concern for anyone within a 300-yard
radius of the barge before, during, or
after the fireworks display.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within a 300-yard
radius of the fireworks barge before,
during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard is proposing this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a
safety zone from 8:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on
September 3, 2022. The safety zone
would cover all navigable waters within
a 300-yard radius of a barge in the
Willamette River located between the
Marquam Bridge and Hawthorne Bridge,
Portland, OR. The duration of the zone
is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after the scheduled
9 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. fireworks display.
No vessel or person would be permitted
to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
47660
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 149 / Thursday, August 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules
duration, of the safety zone. The safety
zone created by this proposed rule is
designed to minimize its impact on
navigable waters. This proposed rule
will prohibit entry into certain
navigable waters of the Willamette River
and is not anticipated to exceed two
hours in duration. Thus, restrictions on
vessel movement within that particular
area are expected to be minimal.
Moreover, under certain conditions
vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by the
COTP. The Coast Guard will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16 about the zone
and the rule allows vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Aug 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
potential effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a safety zone lasting 1.5
hours that would prohibit entry within
300 yards of a fireworks barge. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2022–0641 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 149 / Thursday, August 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all
comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of
the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Dated: July 29, 2022.
M. Scott Jackson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2022–16670 Filed 8–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Center on Channel 16 VHF–FM. Those
in the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative.
(3) The COTP will provide advanced
notice of the regulated area via
broadcast notice to mariners and by onscene designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 10
p.m. on September 3, 2022. It will be
subject to enforcement this entire period
unless the COTP determines it is no
longer needed, in which case the Coast
Guard will inform mariners via Notice
to Mariners.
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2022–0623]
RIN 1625–AA00
■
2. Add § 165.T13–0641 to read as
follows:
Safety Zone; Swim, Columbia River,
Cascade Locks, OR
§ 165.T13–0641 Safety Zone; Willamette
River, Portland, OR
AGENCY:
ACTION:
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Willamette River, from surface to
bottom, in a 300-yard radius from the
fireworks barge located between the
Marquam Bridge and Hawthorne Bridge,
Portland, OR.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting
the Captain of the Port Columbia River
(COTP) in the enforcement of the
regulations in this section.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone
regulations in subpart C of this part, you
may not enter the safety zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by calling (503) 209–2468
or the Sector Columbia River Command
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Aug 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Columbia River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of participants and the
maritime public during a cross-channel
swim on the Columbia River near
Cascade Locks, Oregon, to Stevenson,
Washington, on the morning of
September 5, 2022. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit nonparticipant persons and vessels from
being in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Columbia River or a designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2022–0623 using the Federal Decision
Making Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47661
further instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LT Sean
Murphy, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–
9319, email D13-SMBMSUPortlandWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Columbia River
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On April 20, 2022, True West LLC
with Visit Hood River notified the Coast
Guard that the Roy Webster Cross
Channel Swim, an annually recurring
marine event, will be occurring at
Cascade Locks to Stevenson. The event
consists of a cross-channel swim from
07:30 to 10:30 a.m. on September 5,
2022. The Captain of the Port Columbia
River (COTP) has determined that the
potential hazards associated with the
swim event would be a safety concern
for anyone within the designated area of
the safety zone before, during, or after
the swim.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in these navigable
waters before, during, and after the
scheduled event. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously
33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a
safety zone from 7 until 11 a.m. on
September 5, 2022. The safety zone will
cover all navigable waters of the
Columbia River between RM 149 and
RM 150 near Cascade Locks, Oregon.
The duration of the zone is intended to
ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters before, during, and
after the scheduled 7:30 a.m. to 10:30
p.m. swim. No vessel or person would
be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 149 (Thursday, August 4, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47659-47661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16670]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2022-0641]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Firework Event, Willamette River, Portland, OR
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone for certain waters of the Willamette River. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters
between the Marquam Bridge to Hawthorne Bridge, Portland, Oregon,
during a fireworks display on the evening of September 3, 2022. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Columbia
River or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2022-0641 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Sean Murphy, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503-
240-9319, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Columbia River
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On July 19, 2022, the Oregon Symphony notified the Coast Guard that
it will be conducting a fireworks display from 9 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on
September 3, 2022. The fireworks are to be launched from a barge in the
Willamette River between Marquam Bridge and Hawthorne Bridge, Portland,
Oregon. Hazards from firework displays include accidental discharge of
fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other
debris. The Captain of the Port Columbia River (COTP) has determined
that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in this
display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 300-yard radius
of the barge before, during, or after the fireworks display.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 300-yard radius of the fireworks
barge before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a safety zone from 8:30 p.m. to
10 p.m. on September 3, 2022. The safety zone would cover all navigable
waters within a 300-yard radius of a barge in the Willamette River
located between the Marquam Bridge and Hawthorne Bridge, Portland, OR.
The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels
and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled 9
p.m. to 9:30 p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or person would be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are
proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and
[[Page 47660]]
duration, of the safety zone. The safety zone created by this proposed
rule is designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters. This
proposed rule will prohibit entry into certain navigable waters of the
Willamette River and is not anticipated to exceed two hours in
duration. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that particular
area are expected to be minimal. Moreover, under certain conditions
vessels may still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the
COTP. The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for
the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting 1.5 hours that would prohibit entry within 300 yards of a
fireworks barge. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2022-0641 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://
[[Page 47661]]
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked Questions web page. We review all
comments received, but we will only post comments that address the
topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0641 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-0641 Safety Zone; Willamette River, Portland, OR
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Willamette River, from surface to bottom, in a 300-yard
radius from the fireworks barge located between the Marquam Bridge and
Hawthorne Bridge, Portland, OR.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section--
Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Columbia River
(COTP) in the enforcement of the regulations in this section.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this
part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of
this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by calling (503) 209-2468 or the Sector Columbia River
Command Center on Channel 16 VHF-FM. Those in the safety zone must
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP
or the designated representative.
(3) The COTP will provide advanced notice of the regulated area via
broadcast notice to mariners and by on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on September 3, 2022. It will be subject to enforcement
this entire period unless the COTP determines it is no longer needed,
in which case the Coast Guard will inform mariners via Notice to
Mariners.
Dated: July 29, 2022.
M. Scott Jackson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2022-16670 Filed 8-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P