Safety Zone; Recurring Safety Zone in Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone, 17961-17963 [2022-06488]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
17961
TABLE 1 TO § 100.703—SPECIAL LOCAL REGULATIONS; RECURRING MARINE EVENTS, SECTOR ST. PETERSBURG—
Continued
[Datum NAD 1983]
Date/time
Event/sponsor
Location
Regulated area
(2) Spectator Area. All waters of the Gulf of Mexico contained
with the following points: 26°55′33″ N, 082°22′21″ W, thence
to position 26°54′14″ N, 082°21′35″ W, thence to position
26°54′11″ N, 082°21′40″ W, thence to position 26°55′31″ N,
082°22′26″ W, thence back to position 26°55′33″ N,
082°22′21″ W.
(3) Enforcement Area. All waters of the Gulf of Mexico encompassed within the following points: 26°56′09″ N, 082°22′12″
W, thence to position 26°54′13″ N, 082°21′03″ W, thence to
position 26°53′58″ N, 082°21′43″ W, thence to position
26°55′56″ N, 082°22′48″ W, thence back to position
26°56′09″ N, 082°22′12″ W.
Dated: March 23, 2022.
Matthew A. Thompson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2022–06492 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard is proposing this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Deaven Palenzuela, Sector Sault Sainte
Marie Waterways Management Division,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 906–635–
3223, email ssmprevention@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie (COTP) determines that an
amendment to the recurring safety zones
list as published in 33 CFR 165.918 is
necessary to: Update two existing safety
zone locations and duration of the
events (Mackinaw Area Visitors Bureau
Friday Night Fireworks and Mackinac
Island Fourth of July Celebration
Fireworks). The purpose of this rule is
to ensure safety of vessels and the
navigable waters in the safety zone
before, during, and after the scheduled
event and to improve the overall clarity
and readability of the rule. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
The amendment to this proposed rule
is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and people during annual events
taking place on or near federally
maintained waterways in the Captain of
the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone.
Although this proposed rule will be in
effect year-round, the specific safety
zones listed in Table 165.918 will only
be enforced during a specified period of
time.
When a Notice of Enforcement for a
particular safety zone is published,
entry into, transiting through, or
anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie,
or his or her designated representative.
The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie or his or her designated
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16 or telephone at 906–
635–3319. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2022–0175]
I. Table of Abbreviations
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Recurring Safety Zone in
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
Zone
Coast Guard, Homeland
Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to amend its recurring safety zone
regulations in the Captain of the Port
Sault Sainte Marie Zone. This proposed
rule would update two safety zone
locations and dates. This proposed
amendment action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life associated
with annual marine events and firework
displays on these navigable waters near
Mackinaw City, MI, and Mackinac
Island, MI. This proposed rulemaking
would prohibit persons and vessels
from being in the safety zones unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sault Sainte Marie or a designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2022–0175 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Mar 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On March 21, 2018, the Coast Guard
published an NPRM in the Federal
Register (83 FR 12307) entitled ‘‘Safety
Zones; Recurring Safety Zones in
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
Zone.’’ The NPRM proposed to amend
20 permanent safety zones for annually
recurring events in the Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone under
§ 165.918. The NPRM was open for
comment for 30 days.
On April 20, 2018, the Coast Guard
published the final rule in the Federal
Register (83 FR 12307), after receiving
no comments on the NPRM. Since that
time there have been changes to the
event that were listed in the final rule.
Through this proposed rule the Coast
Guard seeks to update § 165.918 to
reflect the current status of a recurring
marine event in the Captain of the Port
Sault Sainte Marie Zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within a 1000-foot
radius of the fireworks barge before,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
17962
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day for each safety zone.
Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around all safety zones which
will impact small designated areas
within the COTP zone for short
durations of time. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF channel 16 about the
zone and the rule allows vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Mar 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
potential effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a three safety zones: The
Mackinac City Tuesday and Friday
Night Firworks will have one safety
zone lasting 2.5 hours that would
prohibit entry within 1,000 feet of a
fireworks barge and the Annual
Mackinac Island Independence Day
Fireworks will have two safety zones
lasting 1 hour that would prohibit entry
within 750 feet of the fireworks barges.
Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision Making Portal at
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
17963
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2022–0175 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all
comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of
the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
2. Amend § 165.918 by revising
entries (1) and (11) of Table 165.918 to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.918 Safety Zones; Recurring Safety
Zones in Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 165.918
[Datum NAD 1983]
Event
Location
(1) Mackinaw Area Visitors Bureau’s Tuesday and Friday Night
Fireworks; Mackinaw City, MI.
All U.S. navigable waters of the Straits of Mackinac within an approximate 1000-foot radius from the fireworks launch site located in position 45°46′28″ N, 084°43′12″ W.
On or around July 4 and Tuesday
and Friday nights between late
May and late September.
*
*
(11) Mackinac Island Fourth of July
Celebration Fireworks; Mackinac
Island, MI.
*
*
*
All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Huron within an approximate 750foot radius of the fireworks launch site, centered in position
45°50′35″N, 084°37′38″ W and 45°50′30″ N, 084°36′30″ W.
*
On or around July 4th.
*
*
*
Dated: March 22, 2022.
A.R. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2022–06488 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 770
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2017–0245; FRL–8452–02–
OCSPP]
RIN 2070–AK94
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Voluntary Consensus Standards
Update; Formaldehyde Emission
Standards for Composite Wood
Products
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to update the
incorporation by reference of several
voluntary consensus standards in the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Mar 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
*
Event date
*
Agency’s formaldehyde standards for
composite wood products regulations
under the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) that have since been updated,
superseded, or withdrawn by the
issuing organizations. In addition, EPA
is proposing to address remote
inspections for third-party certifiers
(TPCs) required to conduct on-site
inspections in the event of unsafe
conditions such as the on-going COVID–
19 pandemic or other unsafe conditions
such as natural disasters, outbreaks,
political unrest, and epidemics. Finally,
EPA is proposing certain technical
corrections and conforming changes
including updating standards within the
definitions section, clarifying language
as it relates to production, and creating
greater flexibilities for the third-party
certification process.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2017–0245,
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
opened to visitors only by appointment.
The staff continues to provide remote
customer service via email, phone, and
webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and
docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Jeffrey
Putt, Existing Chemicals Risk
Management Division (Mail Code
7404T), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–3703; email address:
putt.jeffrey@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17961-17963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06488]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2022-0175]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Recurring Safety Zone in Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie Zone
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to amend its recurring safety
zone regulations in the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone.
This proposed rule would update two safety zone locations and dates.
This proposed amendment action is necessary to provide for the safety
of life associated with annual marine events and firework displays on
these navigable waters near Mackinaw City, MI, and Mackinac Island, MI.
This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being
in the safety zones unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie or a designated representative. We invite your comments on
this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2022-0175 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Deaven Palenzuela, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 906-635-3223, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On March 21, 2018, the Coast Guard published an NPRM in the Federal
Register (83 FR 12307) entitled ``Safety Zones; Recurring Safety Zones
in Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone.'' The NPRM proposed to
amend 20 permanent safety zones for annually recurring events in the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone under Sec. 165.918. The
NPRM was open for comment for 30 days.
On April 20, 2018, the Coast Guard published the final rule in the
Federal Register (83 FR 12307), after receiving no comments on the
NPRM. Since that time there have been changes to the event that were
listed in the final rule. Through this proposed rule the Coast Guard
seeks to update Sec. 165.918 to reflect the current status of a
recurring marine event in the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
Zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 1000-foot radius of the fireworks
barge before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) determines that
an amendment to the recurring safety zones list as published in 33 CFR
165.918 is necessary to: Update two existing safety zone locations and
duration of the events (Mackinaw Area Visitors Bureau Friday Night
Fireworks and Mackinac Island Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks).
The purpose of this rule is to ensure safety of vessels and the
navigable waters in the safety zone before, during, and after the
scheduled event and to improve the overall clarity and readability of
the rule. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of
this document.
The amendment to this proposed rule is necessary to ensure the
safety of vessels and people during annual events taking place on or
near federally maintained waterways in the Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie Zone. Although this proposed rule will be in effect year-
round, the specific safety zones listed in Table 165.918 will only be
enforced during a specified period of time.
When a Notice of Enforcement for a particular safety zone is
published, entry into, transiting through, or anchoring within the
safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sault Sainte Marie, or his or her designated representative. The
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or his or her designated
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or telephone at 906-
635-3319. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
[[Page 17962]]
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day for each safety zone. Vessel
traffic will be able to safely transit around all safety zones which
will impact small designated areas within the COTP zone for short
durations of time. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF channel 16 about the zone and the rule
allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a three
safety zones: The Mackinac City Tuesday and Friday Night Firworks will
have one safety zone lasting 2.5 hours that would prohibit entry within
1,000 feet of a fireworks barge and the Annual Mackinac Island
Independence Day Fireworks will have two safety zones lasting 1 hour
that would prohibit entry within 750 feet of the fireworks barges.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at
[[Page 17963]]
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2022-0175 in the search box and click
``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed
rule for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.918 by revising entries (1) and (11) of Table
165.918 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.918 Safety Zones; Recurring Safety Zones in Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie.
* * * * *
Table 165.918
[Datum NAD 1983]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event Location Event date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Mackinaw Area Visitors All U.S. navigable On or around
Bureau's Tuesday and Friday waters of the Straits July 4 and
Night Fireworks; Mackinaw of Mackinac within an Tuesday and
City, MI. approximate 1000-foot Friday nights
radius from the between late
fireworks launch site May and late
located in position September.
45[deg]46'28'' N,
084[deg]43'12'' W.
* * * * * * *
(11) Mackinac Island Fourth of All U.S. navigable On or around
July Celebration Fireworks; waters of Lake Huron July 4th.
Mackinac Island, MI. within an approximate
750-foot radius of
the fireworks launch
site, centered in
position
45[deg]50'35''N,
084[deg]37'38'' W and
45[deg]50'30'' N,
084[deg]36'30'' W.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: March 22, 2022.
A.R. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2022-06488 Filed 3-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P