Multiple Employer Plans, 17225-17241 [2022-06005]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
carriers may comply with this
requirement by ensuring that lavatory
water temperature is adjusted to
eliminate the risk of scalding for all
passengers. Automatic or hand-operated
faucets shall dispense water for a
minimum of five seconds for each
application or while the hand is below
the faucet.
(3) Attendant call buttons and door
locks must be accessible to an
individual seated within the lavatory.
(4) Lavatory controls and dispensers
must be discernible through the sense of
touch. Operable parts within the
lavatory must be operable with one
hand and must not require tight
grasping, pinching, or twisting of the
wrist.
(5) The lavatory door sill must
provide minimum obstruction to the
passage of the on-board wheelchair
across the sill while preventing the
leakage of fluids from the lavatory floor
and trip hazards during an emergency
evacuation.
(6) Toe clearance must not be reduced
from current measurements.
(c) You are not required to retrofit
cabin interiors of existing single-aisle
aircraft to comply with the requirements
of paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) As a carrier, you must comply
with the requirements of this section
with respect to new aircraft that you
operate that were originally ordered
after [DATE 18 YEARS AFTER THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL
RULE] or delivered after [DATE 20
YEARS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF THE FINAL RULE] or are part of a
new type-certificated design filed with
the FAA or a foreign carrier’s safety
authority after [DATE ONE YEAR
AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
FINAL RULE].
[FR Doc. 2022–05869 Filed 3–25–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–121508–18]
RIN 1545–BO97
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Multiple Employer Plans
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing;
withdrawal of notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document sets forth
proposed regulations relating to certain
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
multiple employer plans (MEPs)
described in the Internal Revenue Code
(the ‘‘Code’’). The proposed regulations
provide an exception, if certain
requirements are met, to the application
of the ‘‘unified plan rule’’ for MEPs in
the event of a failure by one or more
employers participating in the plan to
take actions required of them to satisfy
the applicable requirements of the Code.
These proposed regulations would affect
certain MEPs, participants in those
MEPs (and their beneficiaries),
employers participating in those MEPs,
and plan administrators of those MEPs.
This document also withdraws
proposed regulations published in the
Federal Register on July 3, 2019,
amending the application of the unified
plan rule to MEPs and provides a notice
of a public hearing.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
must be received by May 27, 2022. A
public hearing on these proposed
regulations has been scheduled for
Wednesday, June 22, 2022, at 10 a.m.
EST. Requests to speak and outlines of
topics to be discussed at the public
hearing must be received by May 27,
2022. If no outlines are received by May
27, 2022, the public hearing will be
cancelled. Requests to attend the public
hearing must be received by 5 p.m. EST
on Friday, June 17, 2022. The
telephonic hearing will be made
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for special assistance during
the telephonic hearing must be received
by Thursday, June 16, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly
encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic
submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and
REG–121508–18) by following the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments
cannot be edited or withdrawn. The IRS
expects to have limited personnel
available to process public comments
that are submitted on paper through
mail. Until further notice, any
comments submitted on paper will be
considered to the extent practicable.
The Department of the Treasury
(Treasury Department) and the IRS will
publish for public availability any
comment submitted electronically, and
to the extent practicable on paper, to its
public docket. Send paper submissions
to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–121508–18),
Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service,
P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044.
For those requesting to speak during
the hearing, send an outline of topic
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17225
submissions electronically via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and
REG–121508–18).
Individuals who want to testify (by
telephone) at the public hearing must
send an email to publichearings@irs.gov
to receive the telephone number and
access code for the hearing. The subject
line of the email must contain the
regulation number REG–121508–18 and
the word TESTIFY. For example, the
subject line may say: Request to
TESTIFY at Hearing for REG–121508–
18. The email should include a copy of
the speaker’s public comments and
outline of topics. Individuals who want
to attend the public hearing by
telephone must also send an email to
publichearings@irs.gov to receive the
telephone number and access code for
the hearing. The subject line of the
email must contain the regulation
number REG–121508–18 and the word
ATTEND. For example, the subject line
may say: Request to ATTEND Hearing
for REG–121508–18. To request special
assistance during the telephonic hearing
contact the Publications and
Regulations Branch of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration) by sending an email to
publichearings@irs.gov (preferred) or by
telephone at (202) 317–5177 (not a tollfree number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the regulations, Pamela
Kinard at (202) 317–6000 or Tom
Morgan at (202) 317–6700; concerning
submission of comments or requests for
a public hearing, Regina Johnson (202)
317–5177 (not toll-free numbers) or by
sending an email to publichearings@
irs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document sets forth proposed
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
section 413(c) of the Code and proposed
regulations under section 413(e) of the
Code. This document also withdraws
proposed regulations under section
413(c) that were published in the
Federal Register on July 3, 2019 (84 FR
31777) (section 413(c) proposed
regulations).
I. General Rules Relating to MEPs
Including the Unified Plan Rule
Section 413(c) provides rules for a
plan maintained by more than one
employer.1 A plan described in section
1 Section 210 of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, Public Law 93–406 (88 Stat.
829), as amended (ERISA), also provides rules
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
Continued
28MRP1
17226
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
413(c) often is referred to as a multiple
employer plan (MEP) or a section 413(c)
plan.
Final regulations under section 413
were published in the Federal Register
on November 9, 1979, 44 FR 65061 (the
final section 413 regulations). The final
section 413 regulations apply to MEPs
described in section 413(c) and to
collectively bargained plans described
in section 413(b) (plans that are
maintained pursuant to certain
collective-bargaining agreements
between employee representatives and
one or more employers).
Pursuant to section 413(c) and the
final section 413 regulations, all of the
employers maintaining a MEP
(participating employers) are treated as
a single employer for purposes of
certain Code requirements, which
include the following requirements:
• Under section 413(c)(1) and 26
CFR1.413–2(b), the rules addressing
plan participation under section 410(a)
and the regulations thereunder are
applied as if all employees of each of
the employers that maintain the plan are
employed by a single employer;
• under section 413(c)(2) and § 1.413–
2(c), in determining whether a MEP is,
with respect to each participating
employer, a plan for the exclusive
benefit of its employees (and their
beneficiaries), all of the employees
participating in the plan are treated as
employees of each such employer; and
• under section 413(c)(3) and § 1.413–
2(d), the minimum vesting standards
under section 411 are applied as if all
employers that maintain the plan
constitute a single employer.
Other rules are applied separately to
each participating employer. For
example, under § 1.413–2(a)(3)(ii), the
minimum coverage requirements of
section 410(b) generally are applied to a
MEP on an employer-by-employer basis.
A plan is not described in section
413(c) unless it is maintained by more
than one employer and is a single plan
under section 414(l). See §§ 1.413–
2(a)(2)(i) and 1.413–1(a)(2). Under
§ 1.414(l)–1(b), a plan is a single plan if
and only if, on an ongoing basis, all of
the plan assets are available to pay
benefits to employees who are covered
by the plan and their beneficiaries.
relating to plans maintained by more than one
employer. Similar to section 413(c) of the Code,
section 210(a) of ERISA states that the minimum
participation standards, minimum vesting
standards, and benefit accrual requirements under
sections 202, 203, and 204 of ERISA, respectively,
shall be applied as if all employees of each of the
employers were employed by a single employer.
Under section 101 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978 (5 U.S.C. App.), the Secretary of the Treasury
has interpretive jurisdiction over section 413 of the
Code, as well as ERISA section 210.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
Under § 1.413–2(a)(3)(iv), the
qualification of a MEP ‘‘is determined
with respect to all employers
maintaining the section 413(c) plan’’
(sometimes referred to as the unified
plan rule). Therefore, the failure by one
employer maintaining the plan (or by
the plan itself) to satisfy an applicable
qualification requirement will result in
the disqualification of the section 413(c)
plan for all employers maintaining the
plan.
The section 413(c) proposed
regulations, which are being withdrawn,
would have created an exception to the
unified plan rule for certain defined
contribution MEPs. The exception
generally would have been available,
provided that certain conditions were
satisfied, if a participating employer in
a MEP was solely responsible for a
qualification failure that the employer
was unable or unwilling to correct, or if
a participating employer failed to
comply with a plan administrator’s
request for information about a
qualification failure that the plan
administrator reasonably believed might
exist.
Written comments responding to the
section 413(c) proposed regulations
were received, and a public hearing was
held on December 11, 2019. The
provisions of these proposed regulations
were informed by the comments
received with respect to the section
413(c) proposed regulations.
II. SECURE Act Provisions Related to
MEPs
Section 101(a) of the Setting Every
Community Up for Retirement
Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE
Act), which was enacted on December
20, 2019, as Division O of the Further
Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2020, Public Law 116–94 (133 Stat.
2534), added section 413(e) to the Code.
Section 413(e) creates a statutory
exception to the unified plan rule for
certain types of MEPs and directs the
Secretary to issue guidance that is
appropriate to carry out that provision.
A MEP is eligible for the exception to
the unified plan rule if it is a section
413(c) defined contribution plan 2
described in section 401(a) or consists of
individual retirement accounts
described in section 408 (including by
reason of section 408(c)),3 provided that
2 Although section 403(b) plans are defined
contribution plans, they are not plans described in
section 401(a) or 408. Therefore, section 413(e)(1)
does not apply to section 403(b) plans.
3 Prior to the SECURE Act, section 413(c)(2) of the
Code provided, ‘‘For purposes of section 401(a), in
determining whether the plan of an employer is for
the exclusive benefit of his employees and their
beneficiaries all plan participants shall be
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the MEP either is maintained by
employers that have a ‘‘common
interest’’ or has a ‘‘pooled plan
provider.’’ 4 Section 413(e)(1) provides
that, with certain exceptions, this type
of MEP will not be treated as failing to
meet the applicable requirements under
the Code merely because one or more
employers of employees covered by the
plan fail to take actions that are required
for the plan to meet those requirements.
Section 413(e)(2)(A) provides that
section 413(e)(1) will not apply unless
the terms of the plan provide that, in the
case of any employer in the plan failing
to take the actions described in section
413(e)(1), the assets of the plan
attributable to employees of that
employer (or beneficiaries of those
employees) will be transferred to a plan
maintained only by that employer (or its
successor), to an eligible retirement plan
as defined in section 402(c)(8)(B) for
each individual whose account is
transferred, or to any other arrangement
that the Secretary determines is
appropriate, unless the Secretary
determines it is in the best interests of
those employees (and their
beneficiaries) to retain the assets in the
plan. Section 413(e)(2)(A) also states
that section 413(e)(1) will not apply
unless the terms of the plan provide
that, in the case of any employer failing
to take the actions described in section
413(e)(1), the employer (and not the
plan or any other employer in the plan)
will be liable for any liabilities with
respect to the plan attributable to
employees of that employer (or their
beneficiaries), except to the extent
provided by the Secretary.
Section 413(e)(2)(B) provides that, if
the pooled plan provider of a plan
described in section 413(e)(1)(B) does
not perform substantially all of the
administrative duties required by
section 413(e)(3)(A)(i) for any plan year,
the Secretary may provide that the
determination as to whether the plan
meets the applicable Code requirements
for a plan described in section 401(a) or
a plan that consists of individual
retirement accounts described in section
408 (including by reason of section
408(c)), whichever is applicable, will be
considered his employees.’’ Section 101(a)(2) of the
SECURE Act amended section 413(c)(2) of the Code
so that it applies for purposes of section 408(c) of
the Code in addition to section 401(a) of the Code.
4 Section 101(c) of the SECURE Act also amended
title I of ERISA to introduce the term ‘‘pooled plan
provider,’’ as well as the term ‘‘pooled employer
plan’’ for a plan with a pooled plan provider. See
ERISA sections 3(44) and 3(43), respectively. These
ERISA provisions do not address compliance under
the Code for plans described in section 401(a) or
408, but the requirements for pooled plan providers
and pooled employer plans are otherwise similar to
the requirements in section 413(e).
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
made in the same manner as would be
made without regard to section
413(e)(1).
Section 413(e)(3)(A) provides that, for
purposes of section 413(e), the term
pooled plan provider means, with
respect to any plan, a person who:
• Is designated by the terms of the
plan as a named fiduciary (within the
meaning of section 402(a)(2) of ERISA),
as the plan administrator, and as the
person responsible to perform specified
administrative duties;
• registers as a pooled plan provider
with the Secretary, and provides such
other information to the Secretary as the
Secretary may require, before beginning
operations as a pooled plan provider;
• acknowledges in writing that such
person is a named fiduciary (within the
meaning of section 402(a)(2) of ERISA),
and the plan administrator, with respect
to the plan; and
• is responsible for ensuring that all
persons who handle assets of, or who
are fiduciaries of, the plan are bonded
in accordance with section 412 of
ERISA.5
The administrative duties for which
the pooled plan provider is responsible
are the duties (including conducting
proper testing with respect to the plan
and the employees of each employer in
the plan) that are reasonably necessary
to ensure that (1) the plan meets any
requirements under ERISA or the Code
applicable to a plan described in section
401(a) or to a plan that consists of
individual retirement accounts
described in section 408, whichever is
applicable, and (2) each employer in the
plan takes actions that the Secretary or
the pooled plan provider determines are
necessary for the plan to meet those
requirements, including providing to
the pooled plan provider any
disclosures or other information that the
Secretary may require or that the pooled
plan provider otherwise determines are
necessary to administer the plan or to
allow the plan to meet the requirements
of section 401(a) or 408. In determining
whether a person meets the
requirements to be a pooled plan
provider with respect to any plan, all
persons who perform services for the
plan and who are treated as a single
employer under section 414(b), (c), (m),
or (o) are treated as one person.
Section 413(e)(3)(B) provides that the
Secretary may perform audits,
examinations, and investigations of
pooled plan providers as may be
necessary to enforce and carry out the
5 The Department of Labor has issued guidance
on the application of the bonding provision in its
final rule on registration requirements for pooled
plan providers. See 85 FR 72934, 72936 n.5
(November 16, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
purposes of section 413(e). Section
413(e)(3)(D) provides that each
employer in a plan with a pooled plan
provider is treated as the plan sponsor
with respect to the portion of the plan
attributable to employees of the
employer (or their beneficiaries), except
with respect to the administrative duties
of the pooled plan provider described in
section 413(e)(3)(A)(i).
Section 413(e)(4)(A) directs the
Secretary to issue guidance that the
Secretary determines appropriate to
carry out section 413(e), including
guidance: (i) Identifying the
administrative duties and other actions
required to be performed by a pooled
plan provider under section 413(e); (ii)
describing the procedures to be taken to
terminate a plan which fails to meet the
requirements to be a plan described in
section 413(e)(1), including the proper
treatment of, and actions needed to be
taken by, any employer in the plan and
the assets and liabilities of the plan
attributable to employees of the
employer (or their beneficiaries); and
(iii) identifying appropriate cases to
which the rules of section 413(e)(2)(A)
will apply to employers in the plan
failing to take the actions described in
section 413(e)(1), taking into account
whether the failure of an employer or
pooled plan provider to provide any
disclosures or other information, or to
take any other action, necessary to
administer a plan or to allow a plan to
meet requirements applicable to the
plan under section 401(a) or 408,
whichever is applicable, has continued
over a period of time that demonstrates
a lack of commitment to compliance.
Section 413(e)(4)(B) states that an
employer or pooled plan provider will
not be treated as failing to meet a
requirement of guidance issued
pursuant to section 413(e)(4) if, before
the guidance is issued, the employer or
pooled plan provider complies in good
faith with a reasonable interpretation of
the provisions of section 413(e) to
which the guidance relates.
Section 413(e)(5) requires the
Secretary to publish model plan
language which meets the requirements
of section 413(e) and section 3(43) and
(44) of ERISA and which may be
adopted in order for a plan to be treated
as a plan that has a pooled plan
provider.
Section 101(e)(2) of the SECURE Act
states that nothing in the amendments
made by section 101(a) of the SECURE
Act shall be construed as limiting the
authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury or the Secretary’s delegate
(determined without regard to such
amendments) to provide for the proper
treatment of a failure to meet any
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17227
requirement applicable under the Code
with respect to one employer (and its
employees) in a multiple employer plan.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Overview
The proposed regulations provide
guidance to implement the exception to
the unified plan rule for section 413(e)
plans (unified plan exception). The
proposed regulations define a section
413(e) plan as a defined contribution
plan described in section 401(a), or a
plan that consists of individual
retirement accounts described in section
408 (including accounts described in
sections 408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)), that
is a section 413(c) plan (as defined in
§ 1.413–2(a)(2)) and that (1) is
maintained by employers that have a
common interest other than having
adopted the plan or (2) has a pooled
plan provider. Because a section 413(e)
plan is a type of section 413(c) plan, a
section 413(e) plan is subject to all of
the rules of section 413(c), including the
rules for participation in section
413(c)(1) and the rules for vesting in
section 413(c)(3).6
These proposed regulations do not
provide guidance on whether a section
413(e) plan is maintained by employers
that have a common interest other than
having adopted the plan. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on what (if any) guidance
would be helpful regarding whether
employers have such a common
interest, including how any guidance
should be coordinated with guidance
issued by the Department of Labor. An
employer that desires to participate in a
section 413(e) plan may choose to
participate in a defined contribution
plan described in section 401(a) or 408
with a pooled plan provider in order to
ensure that the plan is a plan described
in section 413(e).7
Under the unified plan exception, a
section 413(e) plan is not treated as
failing to meet the requirements under
the Code applicable to a plan described
in section 401(a) or to a plan that
consists of individual retirement
accounts described in section 408
(including accounts described in section
408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)), whichever is
applicable, merely because of a
6 For rules relating to section 413(c) plans, see
§ 1.413–2.
7 The Department of Labor has advised the
Treasury Department and the IRS that an
arrangement with a pooled plan provider can
qualify as a pooled employer plan under section
3(43)(A) of ERISA without regard to whether the
arrangement could be structured as a plan
maintained by employers that have a common
interest other than having adopted the plan. See
also 86 FR 51488, 51490, n.12.
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
17228
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
participating employer failure.8 For the
unified plan exception to apply, the
proposed regulations provide that
certain conditions must be satisfied,
including that the section 413(e) plan
administrator must notify the
participating employer of the
participating employer failure and, in
certain circumstances, transfer amounts
attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer to
a separate plan maintained by the
employer or provide an election to
certain participants to remain in the
plan or to have their accounts
transferred to another eligible retirement
plan.
In addition to defining a section
413(e) plan, the proposed regulations
provide a number of other definitions,
including the following: (1) A section
413(e) plan administrator is the plan
administrator, within the meaning of
section 414(g), of a section 413(e) plan;
(2) a participating employer is one of the
employers maintaining a section 413(e)
plan; (3) an unresponsive participating
employer is a participating employer
that has a participating employer
failure; (4) an employee is a current or
former employee of a participating
employer; (5) a beneficiary is a
beneficiary of a deceased employee or
an alternate payee (as defined in section
414(p)) with respect to an employee;
and (6) a participating employer is one
of the employers maintaining a section
413(e) plan. As discussed in the
following paragraphs, the proposed
regulations also include definitions for
the following terms: (1) Participating
employer failure, (2) amounts
attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer,
and (3) pooled plan provider.
The proposed regulations define a
participating employer failure in a
section 413(e) plan as a failure to
provide information or a failure to take
action. A failure to provide information
is defined as a failure of a participating
employer (or any person that is treated
as a single employer with that employer
under section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) to
8 Section 1.416–1, Q&A G–2, includes a rule
similar to the unified plan rule, providing that a
failure by a MEP to satisfy section 416 with respect
to employees of one participating employer means
that all participating employers in the MEP are
maintaining a plan that is not a qualified plan. This
rule is based on the unified plan rule in § 1.413–
2(a)(3)(iv). Therefore, if a section 413(e) plan has an
unresponsive employer that fails to satisfy section
416 and the section 413(e) plan meets the
conditions for the exception to the unified plan
rule, the section 413(e) plan will not be disqualified
for the section 416 failure. The rules in § 1.416–1
are outside the scope of these proposed regulations,
but the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to
address the topic in a broader guidance project
updating the regulations under section 416.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
respond in a timely manner to a
reasonable request by the section 413(e)
plan administrator for data, documents,
or any other information that the plan
administrator reasonably believes is
necessary to determine whether a
section 413(e) plan is in compliance
with a requirement of section 401(a) or
408 as it relates to the participating
employer. A failure to take action is
defined as a failure of a participating
employer (or any person that is treated
as a single employer with that employer
under section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) to
comply in a timely manner with a
reasonable request by a section 413(e)
plan administrator to take action needed
for the section 413(e) plan to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as
it relates to the participating employer.
For purposes of these definitions, a
section 413(e) plan administrator’s
request would not be considered
reasonable if it fails to give the employer
sufficient time to provide information or
take action (and, consequently, a
participating employer’s failure to
respond to an unreasonable request
would not be considered a participating
employer failure).
The proposed regulations define
amounts attributable to the employees
of the unresponsive participating
employer as plan assets and account
balances held by a section 413(e) plan
on behalf of employees of an
unresponsive participating employer
that are attributable to their employment
with the unresponsive participating
employer. The proposed regulations
provide rules that apply if there is no
separate accounting for amounts that are
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer
and with other participating
employers.9 If a participant’s account
balance includes amounts that are
attributable to current employment with
the unresponsive participating employer
and to previous employment with one
or more other participating employers,
the entire account balance is treated as
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer.
On the other hand, if a participant’s
account balance includes amounts that
are attributable to current employment
with a participating employer that is not
the unresponsive participating employer
and to previous employment with the
9 In defining the amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive participating
employer, the references in these proposed
regulations to circumstances in which there is no
‘‘separate accounting’’ are not intended to address
the recordkeeping obligations under Title I of
ERISA, including sections 107 and 209 of ERISA,
of an employer, plan administrator, or other plan
fiduciary.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
unresponsive participating employer,
none of the account balance is treated as
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer.
For purposes of this definition, a
participant’s most recent employment
with a participating employer in the
MEP will be treated as the participant’s
current employment.
Under the proposed regulations, the
term pooled plan provider means, with
respect to any plan, a person who: (1)
Registers as a pooled plan provider with
the Commissioner; (2) is designated by
the terms of the plan as a named
fiduciary (within the meaning of section
402(a)(2) of ERISA), as the plan
administrator, and as the person
required to perform certain
administrative duties; (3) acknowledges
in writing that, with respect to the plan,
it is a named fiduciary and the plan
administrator; and (4) is responsible for
ensuring that all persons who handle
assets of, or who are fiduciaries of, the
plan are bonded in accordance with
section 412 of ERISA.
The requirement to register as a
pooled plan provider with the
Commissioner is fulfilled by satisfying
the parallel requirement under ERISA to
register as a pooled plan provider with
the Department of Labor. On November
16, 2020, the Department of Labor
issued final regulations under section
3(44) of ERISA (29 CFR 2510.3–44) with
respect to the registration requirement.
See 85 FR 72934.
Consistent with section
413(e)(3)(A)(i), the proposed regulations
require a pooled plan provider to
perform all administrative duties that
are reasonably necessary to ensure that:
(1) The plan meets any applicable
requirement under ERISA or the Code
for a plan described in section 401(a) or
for a plan that consists of individual
retirement accounts described in section
408 (including accounts described in
section 408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)),
whichever is applicable, and (2) each
participating employer takes actions,
including providing any disclosures or
other information, that are necessary for
the plan to meet those requirements.10
The administrative duties of a pooled
plan provider include, but are not
limited to, the following:
(1) Monitoring compliance with the
terms of the plan, and Code and ERISA
requirements;
10 In determining whether a person meets the
requirements to be a pooled plan provider with
respect to any section 413(e) plan, all persons who
perform services for the plan and who are treated
as a single employer under section 414(b), (c), (m),
or (o) are treated as one person.
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(2) Maintaining accurate plan data,
including providing up-to-date
participant and beneficiary information;
(3) Performing and conducting
coverage, top-heavy, and discrimination
testing under sections 401(a)(4), (k), and
(m), 408(k), 410, and 416, if applicable;
(4) Processing all employee
transactions (such as investment
changes, loans, and distributions);
(5) Satisfying Code and ERISA
reporting and notice requirements (such
as reporting requirements under
sections 6047 (Form 1099–R,
‘‘Distributions From Pensions,
Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing
Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc.’’)
and 6058 (Form 5500, ‘‘Annual Return/
Report of Employee Benefit Plan’’), and
notice requirements under sections
401(k)(12)(D) and (13)(E) and 402(f));
and
(6) Updating the plan to reflect
statutory changes to the Code and
ERISA, to the extent the responsibility
for updating the plan document has
been delegated to the section 413(e)
plan administrator.
II. Conditions for Application of
Exception to Unified Plan Rule
A. In General
The proposed regulations provide
that, under the unified plan exception,
a section 413(e) plan is not disqualified
on account of a participating employer
failure, provided that the plan satisfies
certain conditions, which are described
in Parts II.B through II.G of this
Explanation of Provisions.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
B. Plan Language
The proposed regulations provide that
the terms of the section 413(e) plan
document must include language
describing the procedures that will be
followed to address a participating
employer failure, including a
description of the notices that the
section 413(e) plan administrator will
send in the case of a participating
employer failure (described in Part II.C
of this Explanation of Provisions, titled
‘‘Notice Requirements’’). The plan must
also state that the section 413(e) plan
administrator will send the first notice
(or, if applicable, the combined first and
second notice) by specified deadlines
that depend on the type of failure. With
respect to a failure to provide
information, the specified deadline for
sending the first notice is 12 months
following the end of the plan year for
which the information is necessary to
determine whether the section 413(e)
plan is in compliance with a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408.
With respect to a failure to take action,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
the specified deadline is 24 months
following the end of the plan year in
which the failure to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408
occurs.
In addition, the plan terms must
describe the actions that the section
413(e) plan administrator will take if, by
the end of the 60-day period following
the date the final notice is provided, the
unresponsive participating employer
does not take appropriate remedial
action with respect to the failure or
initiate a spinoff of amounts attributable
to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer to a separate
single-employer plan that is maintained
by the employer. The terms of the
section 413(e) plan must also provide
that if an unresponsive participating
employer does not either take
appropriate remedial action or initiate a
spinoff by that deadline, participants
who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer have a
nonforfeitable right to the amounts
credited to their accounts that are
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer,
determined in the same manner as if the
plan had terminated pursuant to section
411(d)(3). In connection with the
finalization of these proposed
regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS intend to publish guidance
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin setting
forth model language that may be used
for this purpose.
The section 413(c) proposed
regulations provided that a plan was
ineligible for the unified plan exception
if the plan was under examination
before the first notice with respect to a
participating employer failure was
provided to an unresponsive
participating employer. These proposed
regulations do not include that
condition. However, see the discussion
in Part VI of this Explanation of
Provisions, titled ‘‘Coordination with
EPCRS,’’ on correcting a failure to send
the first notice by the specified
deadline, including when a plan is
under examination.
C. Notice Requirements
The proposed regulations require the
section 413(e) plan administrator to
provide up to three notices regarding a
participating employer failure to the
unresponsive participating employer;
with the final notice, if applicable, also
being provided to participants who are
employees of the employer (and their
beneficiaries) and the Department of
Labor.11
11 As described in Part II.E.2 of this Explanation
of Provisions, titled ‘‘Failure to Provide Information
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17229
The first notice must describe the
participating employer failure (or
failures), as well as the actions the
unresponsive participating employer
must take to remedy the failure, and the
employer’s option to initiate a spinoff of
amounts attributable to the employees
of the unresponsive participating
employer to a separate single-employer
plan that is maintained by the employer.
The first notice must also explain the
consequences under the terms of the
plan if the unresponsive participating
employer neither takes appropriate
remedial action with respect to the
participating employer failure nor
initiates a spinoff, including that
participants who are employees of the
employer will not have any further
contributions made to the plan on their
behalf and that individuals who are
responsible for the failure may have
adverse tax consequences.
If, by the end of the 60-day period
following the date the first notice is
provided, the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer
failure nor initiates a spinoff (as
described in Part II.D of this
Explanation of Provisions, titled
‘‘Actions by Unresponsive Participating
Employer’’), then the section 413(e) plan
administrator must provide a second
notice to the employer. The second
notice must be provided no later than 30
days after the expiration of the 60-day
period following the date the first notice
is provided. The second notice must
include the information required to be
included in the first notice. The second
notice must also state that, if, within 60
days following the date the second
notice is provided, the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer
failure nor initiates a spinoff, then a
final notice describing the participating
employer failure and the consequences
of not correcting the failure will be
provided to participants who are
employees of the employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Department of
Labor.
The proposed regulations provide that
if, by the end of the 60-day period
following the date the second notice is
provided, the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer
failure nor initiates a spinoff, then the
that Becomes a Failure to Take Action,’’ if the
notices relate to a failure to provide information
that becomes a failure to take action, then a new
series of notices may be required.
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
17230
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
section 413(e) plan administrator must
provide a final notice to the employer.
The final notice must be provided no
later than 30 days after the expiration of
the 60-day period following the date the
second notice is provided. Within this
time period, the final notice must also
be provided to participants who are
employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Office of
Enforcement of the Employee Benefits
Security Administration in the
Department of Labor (or its successor
office).12 The final notice must include
the information required to be included
in the first notice and specify the final
deadline for an unresponsive
participating employer to take action
(which is 60 days after the final notice
is provided). The final notice must also
state that the notice is being provided to
participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer
(and their beneficiaries) and to the
Department of Labor.
The section 413(c) proposed
regulations also required plan
administrators to send up to three
notices with respect to a participating
employer failure, but provided a 90-day
period between notices. The shorter 60day period between notices in these
proposed regulations is provided in
response to comments recommending
that the overall notice period be
shortened.
D. Actions by Unresponsive
Participating Employer
The proposed regulations provide that
after the unresponsive participating
employer has received notice of the
participating employer failure, the
employer has the opportunity to either
take appropriate remedial action or
initiate a spinoff. The final deadline for
the unresponsive participating employer
to take one of these actions is 60 days
after the final notice is provided. The
consequences of the employer’s failure
to meet this deadline are described in
Part II.F of this Explanation of
Provisions, titled ‘‘Required Actions
Following Employer’s Failure to Meet
Deadline.’’
The proposed regulations provide that
if a participating employer failure is a
failure to provide information, the
unresponsive participating employer
takes appropriate remedial action with
respect to that failure if the employer (or
any person that is treated as a single
12 The notice to the Department of Labor should
be mailed to the Employee Benefits Security
Administration’s Office of Enforcement (or its
successor office). The Office of Enforcement is
currently located at 200 Constitution Ave. NW,
Suite 600, Washington, DC 20210.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
employer with the employer under
section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) provides
the data, documents, or other
information requested by a section
413(e) plan administrator (or arranges
for that information to be provided to
the section 413(e) plan administrator). If
a participating employer failure is a
failure to take action, the unresponsive
participating employer takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the failure if the employer (or
any person that is treated as a single
employer with the employer under
section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) takes all
actions requested by the section 413(e)
plan administrator, such as making
corrective contributions, needed for the
section 413(e) plan to satisfy the
applicable requirements of section
401(a) or 408.
As an alternative to taking appropriate
remedial action with respect to a failure
to provide information or a failure to
take action, the proposed regulations
provide that an unresponsive
participating employer may, after
receiving notice of the participating
employer failure, initiate a spinoff. An
unresponsive participating employer
initiates a spinoff by directing the
section 413(e) plan administrator to spin
off amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive
participating employer to a separate
single-employer plan that is maintained
by the employer in a manner consistent
with the terms of the section 413(e)
plan. If the section 413(e) plan is
described in section 401(a), then the
spun-off plan must also be a section
401(a) plan. If the section 413(e) plan
consists of individual retirement
accounts described in section 408
(including accounts described in section
408(c), (k), or (p)), then the spun-off
plan must also consist of individual
retirement accounts described in section
408. The section 413(e) plan
administrator must implement the
spinoff, as described in Part II.E.2 of this
Explanation of Provisions, titled
‘‘Implementing a Spinoff.’’
E. Actions by Section 413(e) Plan
Administrator Relating to Remedial
Action or Employer-Initiated Spinoff
1. Failure To Provide Information That
Becomes a Failure To Take Action
The proposed regulations describe
when a failure to provide information
becomes a failure to take action. This
situation could occur if an unresponsive
participating employer takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to a failure to provide
information, and the section 413(e) plan
administrator determines that, based on
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the information provided by the
employer, there is a failure to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as
it relates to that employer’s
participation in the section 413(e) plan.
If the section 413(e) plan administrator
makes a reasonable request for the
employer to take the actions needed to
satisfy the requirement, and the
employer does not comply in a timely
manner with that request, then the
failure to provide information becomes
a failure to take action.
If a failure to provide information
becomes a failure to take action, a
section 413(e) plan will be eligible for
the unified plan exception with respect
to the failure to take action by satisfying
the conditions set forth in the proposed
regulations with respect to that failure.
In satisfying those conditions, notices
provided during the period that the
failure was a failure to provide
information are not taken into account.
For example, a final notice that the
section 413(e) plan administrator
provided in connection with the failure
to provide information would not satisfy
the final notice requirement with
respect to the failure to take action.
However, in response to comments on
the section 413(c) proposed regulations
that there were too many notices
required in cases in which the failure to
provide information became a failure to
take action, the proposed regulations
permit the section 413(e) plan
administrator to reduce the number of
notices that it sends to the employer in
this situation. Specifically, if the section
413(e) plan administrator had provided
the second notice with respect to a
failure to provide information before it
became a failure to take action, then the
section 413(e) plan administrator may
satisfy the requirement to send a first
and second notice with respect to the
failure to take action by sending a
combined first and second notice to the
unresponsive participating employer,
provided that (1) the section 413(e) plan
administrator’s request to take action
(described in the first paragraph under
this Part II.E of this Explanation of
Provisions) is made as soon as
reasonably practicable after the
determination of the failure to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as
it relates to that employer’s
participation in the section 413(e) plan,
and (2) the section 413(e) plan
administrator provides the combined
first and second notice with respect to
the failure to take action not later than
24 months following the end of the plan
year in which the failure to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408
occurs. The combined first and second
notice must include information similar
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
to the information required for the first
and second notices described in Part
II.C of this Explanation of Provisions,
titled ‘‘Notice Requirements.’’ For
example, the combined first and second
notice must describe the participating
employer failure, the actions the
unresponsive participating employer
would need to take to remedy the
failure, and the consequences under the
terms of the plan if the employer neither
takes appropriate remedial action with
respect to the failure nor initiates a
spinoff of amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive
participating employer. In addition, the
combined first and second notice must
specify that, if, within 60 days following
the date the combined first and second
notice is provided, the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer
failure nor initiates a spinoff, then the
final notice described in Part II.C of this
Explanation of Provisions, titled ‘‘Notice
Requirements,’’ will be provided to
participants who are employees of the
employer (and their beneficiaries) and
to the Department of Labor.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
2. Implementing a Spinoff
The proposed regulations provide that
if, instead of taking appropriate
remedial action (as described in Part
II.D of this Explanation of Provisions,
titled ‘‘Actions by Unresponsive
Participating Employer’’), an
unresponsive participating employer
initiates a spinoff of amounts
attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer to
a separate single-employer plan
established and maintained by the
employer, or to a separate plan
sponsored by the employer that consists
of individual retirement accounts, then
the section 413(e) plan administrator
must implement and complete the
spinoff as soon as reasonably practicable
after the employer initiates the spinoff.
Under a safe harbor in the proposed
regulations in § 1.413–3(d)(2), the
section 413(e) plan administrator is
treated as satisfying this requirement if
the spinoff is completed within 180
days of the date on which the
unresponsive participating employer
initiates the spinoff. Comments are
requested on whether there are any
circumstances in which it would be
appropriate for any of the amounts
attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer to
remain in the MEP after the employer
has specifically directed that there be a
spinoff, and, if so, what those
circumstances are, and for which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
employees this treatment may be
appropriate.
F. Required Actions Following
Employer’s Failure To Meet Deadline
The proposed regulations provide that
if, by the final deadline (60 days after
the final notice is provided), an
unresponsive participating employer
neither takes appropriate remedial
action nor initiates a spinoff, then as
soon as reasonably practicable after that
deadline, the section 413(e) plan
administrator must: (1) Stop accepting
contributions from the unresponsive
participating employer and its
employees; (2) provide notice to
participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer
(and their beneficiaries); and (3) to the
extent provided in the proposed
regulations, provide participants who
are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) with an election regarding
treatment of their plan accounts. In
addition, the section 413(e) plan
administrator must distribute benefits as
soon as administratively feasible
following an individual’s election or
following the section 413(e) plan
administrator’s determination that it is
not required to provide an individual
with an election.13
The notice to participants required by
§ 1.413–3(e)(1)(ii)(B) and (e)(2) of the
proposed regulations must state that: (1)
No further contributions will be made to
the section 413(e) plan on behalf of
participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer;
(2) participants who are employees of
the unresponsive participating employer
have a nonforfeitable right to amounts
credited to their accounts that are
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer;
and (3) a participant who is an
employee of the unresponsive
participating employer (or, if applicable,
any beneficiary of the participant) will
receive additional information regarding
the disposition of the participant’s or
beneficiary’s account.
To satisfy the election requirement in
§ 1.413–3(e)(1)(ii)(C) of the proposed
regulations, except as otherwise
provided by the proposed regulations, a
section 413(e) plan administrator must
13 Whether an action is taken as soon as
administratively feasible is determined under all
the facts and circumstances. See Rev. Rul. 89–87,
1989–2 CB 81 (Whether a distribution is made as
soon as administratively feasible after the date of
plan termination specified by an employer is to be
determined under all the facts and circumstances of
a given case but, generally, a distribution that is not
completed within one year following the date of
termination will be presumed not to have been
made as soon as administratively feasible.)
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17231
provide participants who are employees
of the unresponsive participating
employer (and their beneficiaries) with
an election to have amounts attributable
to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (1) directly
rolled over to an eligible retirement plan
within the meaning of section 402(c)(8),
or (2) remain in the section 413(e) plan.
With respect to this election, under a
default rule in § 1.413–3(e)(3)(ii) of the
proposed regulations, an individual
who fails to make an affirmative
election is treated as having elected to
have those amounts remain in the
section 413(e) plan.
The option to remain in the plan is
consistent with section 413(e)(2)(A),
which requires the terms of the plan to
provide, in part, that the plan assets
attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer
will be transferred to an eligible
retirement plan or to another
arrangement that the Secretary
determines is appropriate, unless the
Secretary determines that it is in their
best interests to retain the assets in the
plan. The Treasury Department and the
IRS have determined that it is in the
best interest of an individual who elects
to remain in the section 413(e) plan to
have that election followed. In addition,
the default rule with respect to that
election, under which the account of an
individual who does not make an
affirmative election will remain in the
section 413(e) plan, is consistent with
the consent requirements of section
411(a)(11).
The proposed regulations provide that
if an individual elects to have amounts
attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer
remain in the section 413(e) plan, those
amounts must remain in the section
413(e) plan until a distribution is made
under the terms of the plan without
regard to section 413(e). Although the
terms of the section 413(e) plan
continue to apply to a participant
remaining in the plan, the section 413(e)
plan administrator may not have contact
with the participating employer after
contributions have ceased (and,
therefore, may not be notified about the
individual’s severance from
employment with the employer).
Accordingly, the proposed regulations
provide that, in determining whether a
participant is entitled to a distribution
upon severance from employment, a
section 413(e) plan administrator may
rely on the participant’s representation
that the participant has experienced a
severance from employment, unless the
section 413(e) plan administrator has
actual knowledge to the contrary.
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
17232
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
The option to remain in the plan is
not available to an individual if plan
terms would have provided for a
mandatory distribution of those
amounts had the participant
experienced a severance from
employment. Instead, those amounts
must be distributed from the section
413(e) plan. In this situation, the
proposed regulations provide rules for
the disposition of the mandatory
distribution, based on the applicability
of section 401(a)(31) under the terms of
the plan that would apply in the case of
a severance from employment.
Comments are requested on whether
there should be special rules for
mandatory distributions that apply in
this situation, including in cases
involving missing participants.
The proposed regulations provide that
the portion of the mandatory
distribution that is an eligible rollover
distribution subject to section
401(a)(31)(B) must be directly rolled
over to an eligible retirement plan. In
accordance with section 401(a)(31)(B),
the section 413(e) plan administrator
must provide the individual with an
election for the rollover to be made
either to an eligible retirement plan
chosen by the individual or to an
individual retirement plan of a
designated trustee or issuer. For
example, a section 413(e) plan
administrator is not required to provide
the option to remain in the plan to an
individual with an account balance of
$3,000 if, consistent with sections
401(a)(31)(B) and 411(a)(11), plan terms
require mandatory distributions with
respect to a participant who experiences
a severance from employment with an
account balance of up to $5,000 and
automatic rollover of distributions with
respect to an participant who
experiences a severance from
employment with an account balance
that exceeds $1,000.
For any portion of the mandatory
distribution that is an eligible rollover
distribution subject to section
401(a)(31)(A) (but not section
401(a)(31)(B)), the section 413(e) plan
administrator must provide the
individual with an election in
accordance with section 401(a)(31)(A)
for that portion to be rolled over directly
to an eligible retirement plan chosen by
the individual or, if no eligible
retirement plan is chosen, paid directly
to the individual.
For the portion of a mandatory
distribution that is not subject to the
requirement to offer a direct rollover
option under section 401(a)(31), the
section 413(e) plan administrator must
pay the individual. For example, a
section 413(e) plan administrator is not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
required to provide an election to an
individual with an account balance of
less than $200 if, consistent with section
411(a)(11) and § 1.401(a)(31), Q&A–11,
plan terms require that mandatory
distributions of less than $200 be paid
directly to distributees.
Giving an individual an election to
have amounts transferred to an
individual retirement plan generally
does not mean that a distribution may
be paid directly to the individual.
However, if, pursuant to the proposed
regulations, an individual makes an
election to have an amount directly
rolled over to an eligible retirement
plan, and a portion of the amount is not
an eligible rollover distribution
described in section 402(c)(4), then that
portion must be paid directly to the
individual. For example, the portion of
a distribution that would be a required
minimum distribution under section
401(a)(9) must be paid directly to the
individual rather than directly rolled
over. In addition, if an individual is
otherwise entitled to a distribution from
the section 413(e) plan without regard to
section 413(e), the individual may elect
to have amounts paid directly to the
individual.
Any election that is provided to an
individual pursuant to the proposed
regulations must include an effective
opportunity for the individual to make
the election. Whether an individual has
an effective opportunity is determined
based on all the relevant facts and
circumstances, including the adequacy
of notice of the availability of the
election, the period of time during
which the election may be made, and
any other conditions on the election.
G. Duties of a Pooled Plan Provider
The proposed regulations provide
that, if a section 413(e) plan has a
pooled plan provider during the plan
year of a participating employer failure,
the unified plan exception will not
apply unless the pooled plan provider
performs substantially all of the
administrative duties that are required
of the pooled plan provider for that
year.
III. Other Rules
A. Form of Notices and Elections
Any notice required to be provided or
election required to be made under the
proposed regulations must be in written
or electronic form. For notices and
elections provided to or made by
participants and beneficiaries, see
generally § 1.401(a)–21 for rules
permitting the use of electronic media to
provide applicable notices and make
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
participant elections with respect to
retirement plans.
B. Status of Spun-Off Plan
In the case of any plan that is spun
off in accordance with the proposed
regulations, any participating employer
failure that would have caused the
section 413(e) plan to fail to meet the
requirements of section 401(a) or 408, as
applicable, but for the application of the
unified plan exception, will result in the
spun-off plan failing to meet those
requirements.
C. Responsible Parties
The proposed regulations provide that
a participating employer demonstrates a
lack of commitment to compliance if the
participating employer fails to take
appropriate remedial action or initiate a
spinoff by the final deadline (60 days
after the final notice). The IRS reserves
the right to pursue appropriate remedies
under the Code against any party (such
as the owner of the participating
employer) who is responsible for the
failure to satisfy the requirements of
section 401(a) or 408, as applicable,
even in the party’s capacity as a
participant or beneficiary (such as by
not treating a section 413(e) plan
distribution made with respect to the
owner of a participating employer as an
eligible rollover distribution).
IV. Updates to Section 413(c)
Regulations
The proposed regulations update
existing § 1.413–2 to reflect legislation
enacted after the regulations were
issued. The proposed regulations update
the rules for determining the number of
employers maintaining a plan for
purposes of the requirement in § 1.413–
2(a)(2)(i)(B) of the proposed regulations
that a section 413(c) plan must be
maintained by more than one employer.
For purposes of that requirement, the
proposed regulations include a rule that
the number of employers maintaining a
plan is determined by treating any
employers described in section 414(m)
(relating to affiliated service groups) as
if such employers are a single employer.
The existing regulations in § 1.413–
2(a)(2) were issued in 1979 and,
therefore, did not address section
414(m), which was added by section
201(a) of the Miscellaneous Revenue
Act of 1980, Public Law 96–605 (94 Stat.
3521). Section 414(m) provides that all
employers in an affiliated service group
shall be treated as a single employer for
certain purposes.
The proposed regulations also modify
the definition of a section 413(c) plan
and the unified plan rule in the final
section 413(c) regulations to apply to a
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
plan that consists of individual
retirement accounts under section 408,
remove a reference to section 405(a)
from the final section 413(c) regulations
(because that section was repealed), and
modify the final section 413(c)
regulations to add that the exclusive
benefit provision in section 413(c)(2)
applies for purposes of section 408(c).14
V. Withdrawal of Section 413(c)
Proposed Regulations
Because section 101 of the SECURE
Act amended the Code with respect to
the unified plan rule after the issuance
of the section 413(c) proposed
regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS withdraw the section 413(c)
proposed regulations.
VI. Coordination With EPCRS
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. In General
Under EPCRS,15 a failure to follow
plan terms is an operational failure that
adversely affects plan qualification. An
operational failure would include, for
example, a section 413(e) plan
administrator’s failure to provide the
first notice by the applicable deadline
included in plan terms, discussed in
Part II.B of this Explanation of
Provisions, titled ‘‘Plan Language.’’
EPCRS sets forth three programs for
correcting operational failures.
Under the Self-Correction Program
(SCP), a plan sponsor that follows
established compliance practices and
procedures may correct operational
failures without paying a fee or
sanction. A plan sponsor of a qualified
plan (for example, a plan that is
intended to satisfy section 401(a)) may
correct significant operational failures
under SCP if the plan has a favorable
determination letter or a favorable
opinion or advisory letter.16 In general,
correction of a significant operational
failure through SCP must be completed
by the last day of the correction period,
14 Section 414(l) does not apply to a plan that
consists of individual retirement accounts
described in section 408. Therefore, in § 1.413–
2(a)(2)(i)(A), the proposed regulations limit the
cross references to section 413(a) and § 1.413–
1(a)(2) to apply only to qualified plans.
15 The Employee Plans Compliance Resolution
System (EPCRS) is a comprehensive system of
correction programs for sponsors of certain
retirement plans, including plans that are intended
to satisfy the requirements of sections 401(a),
408(k), and 408(p). EPCRS provides procedures for
an employer to correct a plan’s failure to satisfy an
applicable qualification requirement so that the
failure does not result in disqualification of the
plan. EPCRS has been updated and expanded
several times, most recently in Rev. Proc. 2021–30,
2021–I.R.B. 324. The discussion in this Part VI of
this Explanation of Provisions is limited to the
application of EPCRS to qualified plans under
section 401(a). See Rev. Proc. 2021–30 for rules
under sections 408(k) and 408(p).
16 See section 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 2021–30.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
which generally ends on the last day of
the third plan year following the plan
year for which the failure occurred.17
However, the correction period for a
significant operational failure that
occurs for any plan year ends on the
first date the plan or plan sponsor is
under examination 18 for that plan
year.19
Under the Voluntary Correction
Program (VCP), a plan sponsor, at any
time before audit, may file a VCP
submission, pay an applicable user fee,
implement corrective actions, and
satisfy any other conditions in an IRS
compliance statement for correction of
an operational failure in a qualified
plan, SEP, or SIMPLE IRA Plan. In
general, if the plan or plan sponsor is
under examination, VCP is not
available.
Under the Audit Closing Agreement
Program (Audit CAP), if an operational
failure (other than a failure corrected
through SCP or VCP) is identified on
audit, the plan sponsor may correct the
failure and pay a sanction. The sanction
imposed will bear a reasonable
relationship to the nature, extent, and
severity of the failure, and will be based
on a number of factors,20 including the
maximum payment amount (which is
approximately equal to the tax the IRS
could collect upon plan
disqualification).
B. Using EPCRS To Correct an
Operational Failure to Timely Provide
the First Notice
A section 413(e) plan administrator’s
failure to provide the first notice with
respect to a participating employer
failure by the applicable deadline
included in plan terms would not affect
the section 413(e) plan’s eligibility for
the unified plan exception. However,
the failure to follow plan terms would
result in an operational failure treated as
a significant operational failure under
EPCRS that is independent of any
underlying participating employer
failure.
Whether SCP, VCP, or Audit CAP is
available to correct an operational
failure to provide the first notice by the
applicable deadline will be determined
under the rules of EPCRS. Because the
failure is a significant operational
17 Section 9 of Rev. Proc. 2021–30 addresses the
period for correcting significant operational failures
under SCP, including some exceptions to this
general rule.
18 Under examination is defined in section 5.08
of Rev. Proc. 2021–30.
19 If correction has been substantially completed
(as described in section 9.03 of Rev. Proc. 2021–30)
before the end of the correction period, correction
is permitted to be completed after the end of the
correction period.
20 See section 14 of Rev. Proc. 2021–30.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17233
failure, the failure may be corrected
under SCP only if correction is
completed (or substantially completed)
by the end of the correction period, and
the correction period generally ends on
the last day of the third plan year
following the plan year containing the
deadline for sending the first notice. For
example, if the deadline for sending the
first notice is December 31, 2024, a
failure to provide notice by that
deadline generally may be corrected
through SCP until December 31, 2027
(assuming the plan year is the calendar
year). If, however, the plan or plan
sponsor comes under examination for
2024 beginning on July 1, 2026, the
correction period for SCP ends on July
1, 2026, and SCP is no longer available
(unless the correction had been
substantially completed by that date).
A failure to provide the first notice by
the deadline included in the terms of
the plan may also be corrected under
VCP. If, for example, the deadline for
sending the first notice is December 31,
2024, and the correction period under
SCP ends on December 31, 2027, then
a VCP application may be submitted
with respect to the failure in 2028 or in
a later year, provided that neither the
plan nor the plan sponsor is under
examination for the plan year ending
December 31, 2024. If SCP and VCP are
not available with respect to a failure,
the failure may be corrected under
Audit CAP.
C. Resolution of Participating Employer
Failure
If the unresponsive participating
employer provides the information
requested by the section 413(e) plan
administrator in connection with a
failure to provide information, there is
no longer a failure to provide
information. If the unresponsive
participating employer takes the action
requested by the plan administrator in
connection with a failure to take action
(and the plan satisfies the requirements
of SCP, VCP, or Audit CAP, as
applicable, with respect to the
underlying failure), there is no longer a
failure to take action. In either case, if
a participating employer failure no
longer exists, an operational failure to
provide the first notice by the deadline
included in plan terms with respect to
that participating employer failure is
treated as corrected.
Proposed Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to
apply beginning on the date of
publication of the Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register. Pursuant to
section 413(e)(4)(B), until the final
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
17234
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
regulations are published, an employer
or pooled plan provider may rely on a
good faith, reasonable interpretation of
the provisions of section 413(e) to
which the final regulations relate.
Compliance with these proposed
regulations is considered reliance on a
good faith, reasonable interpretation of
the provisions of section 413(e) to
which the final regulations relate.
Availability of IRS Documents
For copies of recently issued revenue
procedures, revenue rulings, notices and
other guidance published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin, please visit the IRS
website at www.irs.gov or contact the
Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Impact Analysis
These regulations are not subject to
review under section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866 pursuant to the
Memorandum of Agreement (April 11,
2018) between the Treasury Department
and the Office of Management and
Budget regarding review of tax
regulations.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The following provisions of the
proposed regulations contain a
collection of information: (1) § 1.413–
3(a)(2)(i) (requirement to adopt plan
language); (2) § 1.413–3(a)(2)(ii)(A), (b),
and (d)(1)(ii) (requirement to provide
notice with respect to a participating
employer failure); (3) § 1.413–3(a)(3)
(requirements to be a pooled plan
provider); (4) § 1.413–3(e)(1)(ii)(B) and
(e)(2) (requirement to provide notice to
certain participants and beneficiaries;
and (5) § 1.413–3(e)(1)(ii)(C), (e)(3), and
(e)(4) (requirement to provide an
election to certain participants and
beneficiaries). The collection of
information contained in proposed
§ 1.413–3 will generally be carried out
by section 413(e) plan administrators
seeking to satisfy the conditions for the
exception to the unified plan rule. The
collection of information in this notice
of proposed rulemaking has been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for review in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)).
1. Plan Language Requirement, § 1.413–
3(a)(2)(i)
Section 1.413–3(a)(2)(i) states that, as
one of the conditions of the exception
to the unified plan rule, a section 413(e)
plan must include plan language that
sets forth the procedures that will be
followed to address participating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
employer failures. Thus, a section 413(e)
plan will not be eligible for the
exception to the unified plan rule if it
does not satisfy this plan-language
requirement. In general, the plan
language requirement is a one-time
paperwork burden for each section
413(e) plan. In addition, after final
regulations are issued, the IRS intends
to publish model plan language, which
will help to minimize the burden.
We estimate that the burden for this
requirement under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 will be 3 hours
per section 413(e) plan. Given the
potential benefits of satisfying the
conditions for the unified plan
exception, we assume that
approximately 95 percent of section
413(e) plans (4,275 section 413(e)
plans 21) will be amended to satisfy this
condition. Therefore, the total burden of
this requirement is estimated to be
12,825 hours (4,275 section 413(e) plans
times 3 hours). However, because a
section 413(e) plan that adopts an
amendment will generally do so on a
one-time basis, to determine an annual
estimate, the total time is divided by
three, or 4,275 hours annually (section
413(e) plans times 1 hour).
2. Notice Requirements, § 1.413–
3(a)(2)(ii)(A), (b), and (d)(1)(ii)
Section 1.413–3(a)(ii)(A) of the
proposed regulations provide that notice
is another condition of the exception to
the unified plan rule. In most cases,
§ 1.413–3(b) of the proposed regulations
would require a section 413(e) plan
administrator to send up to three notices
informing an unresponsive participating
employer of a participating employer
failure and the consequences if the
employer fails to take remedial action or
initiate a spinoff from the section 413(e)
plan. After each notice is provided, the
employer has 60 days to take
appropriate remedial action or initiate a
spinoff from the section 413(e) plan. If
the employer takes those actions after
the first or second notice is provided,
subsequent notices are not required.
Thus, it is possible that a section 413(e)
plan administrator will send fewer than
three notices to an employer. However,
because the notice requirements only
apply if an employer has already been
unresponsive to the section 413(e) plan
administrator’s requests, we assume that
21 This calculation uses data from the 2018 Form
5500, ‘‘Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit
Plan.’’ These filings indicate that there are
approximately 4,523 defined contribution MEPs.
See 2018 Form 5500 Annual Reports Abstract
(dol.gov). We estimate that 4,500 defined
contribution MEPs will satisfy the requirements to
be a section 413(e) plan.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in most cases, all three notices will be
provided.
Section 1.413–3(d)(1)(ii) of the
proposed regulations provide that if a
failure to provide information becomes
a failure to take action, the section
413(e) plan administrator may be
required to send up to two (rather than
three) notices with respect to the failure
to take action by combining the first and
second notices. This rule applies if the
section 413(e) plan administrator had
provided the second notice with respect
to the failure to provide information and
certain other conditions are satisfied.
We estimate that the burden of
preparing the notices will be an average
of 3 hours per unresponsive
participating employer. We estimate
that approximately 450 section 413(e)
plans (10 percent of the 4,500 total
estimated section 413(e) plans described
in footnote 20) will provide notice with
respect to one unresponsive
participating employer per year. We
estimate that approximately 10 percent
of section 413(e) plans (10 percent of
4,500 section 413(e) plans is 450 section
413(e) plans) will provide notice with
respect to one unresponsive
participating employer per year.
Therefore, we estimate a burden of
1,350 hours (450 section 413(e) plans
times 3 hours). As with all estimates in
this collection of information, we expect
to be able to adjust these estimates
based on experience after the
regulations are finalized.
The notices must be sent to the
unresponsive participating employer
and the final notice will also be sent to
plan participants who are employees of
the unresponsive participating employer
(and their beneficiaries) and to the
Department of Labor. We estimate that,
on average, a section 413(e) plan
administrator will send the final notice
to approximately 50 plan participants
who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their
beneficiaries). Based on the estimate in
the previous paragraph that 450 section
413(e) plans will provide notice with
respect to one unresponsive
participating employer per year, we
estimate the burden of distributing these
notices to be an average of 2 hours per
section 413(e) plan, for a total burden of
900 hours (450 section 413(e) plans
times 2 hours).
3. Requirements for Pooled Plan
Providers, § 1.413–3(a)(3)
Under the proposed regulations, the
term pooled plan provider means, with
respect to any plan, a person who
satisfies the following requirements: (1)
Registers as a pooled plan provider with
the Commissioner (§ 1.413–
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
3(a)(3)(i)(A)); (2) is designated by the
terms of the plan as a named fiduciary
(within the meaning of section 402(a)(2)
of ERISA), as the plan administrator,
and as the person required to perform
certain administrative duties (§ 1.413–
3(a)(3)(i)(B)); (3) acknowledges in
writing that, with respect to the plan, it
is a named fiduciary and the plan
administrator (§ 1.413–3(a)(3)(i)(C)); and
(4) is responsible for ensuring that all
persons who handle assets of, or who
are fiduciaries of, the plan are bonded
in accordance with section 412 of
ERISA (§ 1.413–3(a)(3)(i)(D)).
Pursuant to proposed § 1.413–
3(a)(3)(i)(A), the requirement to register
as a pooled plan provider under section
413(e) is fulfilled by satisfying the
parallel requirement under ERISA to
register as a pooled plan provider with
the Department of Labor. On November
16, 2020, the Department of Labor
issued final regulations under section
3(44) of ERISA (29 CFR 2510.3–44) with
respect to the registration requirement.
See 85 FR 72934. The OMB Control
Number associated with the
requirement in those regulations is
1210–0164.
With respect to § 1.413–3(a)(3)(i)(B)
and (C), the Department of Labor
estimates that roughly 3,200 pooled
plan providers will file an original
registration, and that there will be 3,460
supplemental filings in the first year.
See 85 FR 72952. A supplemental filing
may amend the original registration to
include information for pooled
employer plans that either begin or
cease operations, or it can be used to
make certain other changes to the initial
filing. Based on this data, we estimate
that in the first year a large number of
the estimated supplemental filings, or
3,000, will be used to report the
beginning of pooled employer plan
operations. In subsequent years, we
estimate that approximately 450 plans
with pooled plan providers will
commence operations.22 We estimate
the combined burden of § 1.413–
3(a)(3)(i)(B) and (C) to be an average of
15 minutes per section 413(e) plan, for
a total initial burden of 750 hours (3,000
section 413(e) plans times 15 minutes)
and a total annual burden of 112.5 hours
(450 section 413(e) plans times 15
minutes).
4. Notice to Participants, § 1.413–
3(e)(1)(ii)(B) and (e)(2)
If an unresponsive participating
employer neither takes appropriate
22 This estimate was informed by the Department
of Labor’s estimate of the number of pooled
employer plans expected to commence operations.
See 85 FR 72952–3
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
remedial action nor initiates a spinoff by
the deadline in the proposed
regulations, then the section 413(e) plan
administrator must provide notice to
participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer
(and their beneficiaries) stating the
following: (1) No further contributions
will be made to the section 413(e) plan
on their behalf; (2) they have a
nonforfeitable right to amounts credited
to their accounts that are attributable to
employment with the unresponsive
participating employer; and (3) they will
receive additional information regarding
the disposition of their accounts. We
estimate that in a given year, 5 percent
of all section 413(e) plans (225 section
413(e) plans) will provide this notice,
and that each notice will be sent to
approximately 50 individuals. We also
estimate that the burden for this
requirement is 1 hour. Based on this
number, we estimate that the burden of
preparing and distributing the notices
will be 225 hours (225 section 413(e)
plans times 1 hour).
5. Election, § 1.413–3(e)(1)(ii)(C), (e)(3)
and (4)
If an unresponsive participating
employer neither takes appropriate
remedial action nor initiates a spinoff by
the deadline in the proposed
regulations, then the section 413(e) plan
administrator generally must provide
participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer
(and their beneficiaries) with an election
to have amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive
participating employer directly rolled
over to an eligible retirement plan
within the meaning of section 402(c)(8)
or remain in the section 413(e) plan. A
participant whose account is subject to
the mandatory distribution rules will
have an alternative election. We
estimate that in a given year, 5 percent
of all section 413(e) plans (225 section
413(e) plans) will provide an election,
and that each election will be sent to
approximately 50 individuals. We also
estimate that the burden for this
requirement is 3 hours. Based on this
number, we estimate that the burden for
this requirement will be 675 hours (225
section 413(e) plans times 3 hours).
Comments on the collection of
information should be sent to the Office
of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Treasury, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503, with copies to the Internal
Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports
Clearance Officer,
SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP; Washington, DC
20224. Comments on the collection of
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17235
information should be received by May
27, 2022. Comments are specifically
requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the IRS,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
The accuracy of the estimated burden
associated with the proposed collection
of information;
How the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected may be
enhanced;
How the burden of complying with
the proposed collections of information
may be minimized, including through
the application of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and
Estimates of capital or start-up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of service to provide
information.
Estimated total average annual
recordkeeping burden: 7,750 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per
response: 1 hour, 43 minutes.
Estimated number of recordkeepers:
4,500.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid control
number assigned by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Books or records relating to a
collection of information must be
retained as long as their contents may
become material in the administration
of any internal revenue law. Generally,
tax returns and tax return information
are confidential, as required by 26
U.S.C. 6103.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
It is hereby certified that these
proposed regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6). This
certification is based on the fact that the
proposed regulations reflect the
statutory changes to section 413 made
by section 101 of the SECURE Act. More
specifically, these regulations merely
conform existing regulations under
section 413(c) and implement new
regulations under section 413(e) in a
manner that is consistent with the new
statutory language.
Although these proposed regulations
might affect a substantial number of
small entities, the economic impact of
these proposed regulations is not
expected to be significant. These
regulations are not expected to result in
economically meaningful changes in
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
17236
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
behavior for MEPs and participating
employers. While MEPs may be an
efficient way to reduce costs and
complexity associated with establishing
and maintaining defined contribution
plans, some employers may be reluctant
to join a MEP because of the potential
adverse impact of the unified plan rule.
These proposed regulations will
implement a statutory exception to the
unified plan rule, thus eliminating a
potential barrier to an employer joining
a MEP.
It is unlikely that the exception to the
unified plan rule will be used often in
a section 413(e) MEP. In general, it is
expected that participating employers in
defined contribution MEPs will comply
with applicable requirements for a
defined contribution plan. Accordingly,
the use of the exception to the unified
plan rule by a section 413(e) plan is
expected to be rare.
For the reasons stated, a regulatory
flexibility analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act is not required. The
Treasury Department and the IRS invite
comments on the impact of these
regulations on small entities. Pursuant
to section 7805(f) of the Code, this
notice of proposed rulemaking has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel of
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Persons who wish to present oral
comments by telephone at the hearing
must submit electronic or written
comments and an outline of the topics
to be addressed and the time to be
devoted to each topic by May 27, 2022
as prescribed in the preamble under the
ADDRESSES section.
A period of 10 minutes will be
allocated to each person for making
comments. After the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed, the IRS
will prepare an agenda containing the
schedule of speakers. Copies of the
agenda will be made available at
www.regulations.gov, search IRS and
REG–121508–18. Copies of the agenda
will also be available by emailing a
request to publichearings@irs.gov.
Please put ‘‘REG–121508–18 Agenda
Request’’ in the subject line of the email.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed amendments to
the regulations are adopted as final
regulations, consideration will be given
to comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS as prescribed in the preamble
under the ADDRESSES section. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of the
proposed regulations. Comments are
specifically requested on what (if any)
guidance would be helpful regarding
whether employers have a common
interest other than having adopted a
plan, as described in Part I.A of the
Explanation of Provisions, titled
‘‘Overview.’’ Comments are also
specifically requested on the rules for
mandatory distributions for employees
of an unresponsive participating
employer, as described in Part II.F of the
Explanation of Provisions, titled
‘‘Required Actions Following
Employer’s Failure to Meet Deadline.’’
Any electronic comments submitted,
and to the extent practicable any paper
comments submitted, will be made
available at www.regulations.gov or
upon request.
A telephonic public hearing has been
scheduled for June 22, 2022, beginning
at 10 a.m. EST. The rules of 26 CFR
601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing.
Under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805,
the notice of proposed rulemaking that
was published in the Federal Register
on Wednesday, July 3, 2019 (84 FR
31777) is withdrawn.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Jamie Dvoretzky and
Pamela Kinard, Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt
Organizations, and Employment Taxes
(EEE)). However, other personnel from
the IRS and the Treasury Department
participated in the development of these
regulations.
Withdrawal of Proposed Amendments
to the Regulations
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Amend § 1.413–2 by revising
paragraph (a)(2), (a)(3)(iv), (a)(4), and (c)
to read as follows:
■
§ 1.413–2 Special rules for plans
maintained by more than one employer.
(a) * * *
(2) Section 413(c) plan—(i) Definition
of section 413(c) plan. A plan (and each
trust which is part of such plan) is a
section 413(c) plan if—
(A) The plan is a single plan (which
for a qualified plan is a single plan
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
within the meaning of section 413(a)
and § 1.413–1(a)(2)); and
(B) The plan is maintained by more
than one employer.
(ii) Determining the number of
employers maintaining the plan. For
purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B) of this
section, the number of employers
maintaining a plan is determined by
treating any employers described in
section 414(b) (relating to a controlled
group of corporations), any employers
described in section 414(c) (relating to
trades or businesses under common
control), or any employers described in
section 414(m) (relating to affiliated
service groups), whichever is
applicable, as if such employers are a
single employer.
(iii) Master or prototype plans and
common trust funds. A master or
prototype plan is not a section 413(c)
plan unless such a plan is described in
this paragraph (a)(2). Similarly, the mere
fact that a plan, or plans, utilize a
common trust fund or otherwise pool
plan assets for investment purposes
does not, by itself, result in a particular
plan being treated as a section 413(c)
plan.
(3) * * *
(iv) Whether a section 413(c) plan
complies with the requirements of
section 401(a), 403(a), or 408 is
determined with respect to all
participating employers. Consequently,
the failure by one participating
employer (or by the plan itself) to satisfy
an applicable requirement of those
sections will result in the section 413(c)
plan failing to satisfy that requirement
with respect to all employers
maintaining the section 413(c) plan.
However, the rules in this paragraph
(a)(3)(iv) do not apply to the extent
provided in section 413(e) and § 1.413–
3.
(4) Applicability dates—(i) General
applicability date. Except as otherwise
provided in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this
section, section 413(c) and this section
apply to a plan for plan years beginning
after December 31, 1953.
(ii) Special applicability date.
Paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3)(iv), and (c) of
this section apply beginning on the date
of publication of the Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register. For earlier
periods, the rules of paragraphs (a)(2),
(a)(3)(iv), and (c) of 26 CFR 1.413–2
(revised as of April 1, 2021) apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Exclusive benefit. In the case of a
plan subject to this section, in
determining whether the plan of an
employer is for the exclusive benefit of
its employees (and their beneficiaries)
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
for purposes of sections 401(a) and
408(c), all of the employees
participating in the plan shall be treated
as employees of the employer.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 3. Section 1.413–3 is added to
read as follows:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 1.413–3
Plans
Special Rules for Section 413(e)
(a) Exception to unified plan rule for
section 413(e) plans—(1) In general.
Notwithstanding § 1.413–2(a)(3)(iv), a
section 413(e) plan will not be treated
as failing to meet the requirements
under the Code applicable to a plan
described in section 401(a) or to a plan
that consists of individual retirement
accounts described in section 408
(including accounts described in section
408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)), whichever is
applicable, merely because of a
participating employer failure, provided
that the conditions in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section are satisfied.
(2) Conditions for exception to general
rule. The conditions for the exception to
the unified plan rule in paragraph (a)(1)
of this section are set forth in
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(i) Plan language. The terms of the
section 413(e) plan must set forth the
procedures that will be followed to
address a participating employer failure,
including:
(A) A description of the notices that
the section 413(e) plan administrator
will send in the case of a participating
employer failure, pursuant to paragraph
(b) of this section;
(B) A statement that the section 413(e)
plan administrator will send the first
notice described in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section (or, if applicable, the
combined first and second notice
described in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this
section) by a specified deadline (which,
for a failure to provide information, is
12 months following the end of the plan
year for which the information is
necessary to determine whether the
section 413(e) plan is in compliance
with a requirement of section 401(a) or
408 and which, for a failure to take
action, is 24 months following the end
of the plan year in which the failure to
satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or
408) occurs;
(C) A description of the actions that
the section 413(e) plan administrator
will take if, by the final deadline
described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, an unresponsive participating
employer does not either take
appropriate remedial action pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2) of this section or
initiate a spinoff pursuant to paragraph
(c)(3) of this section; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
(D) A statement that if an
unresponsive participating employer
does not either take appropriate
remedial action or initiate a spinoff by
the final deadline described in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer
have a nonforfeitable right to the
amounts credited to their accounts that
are attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer,
determined in the same manner as if the
plan had terminated pursuant to section
411(d)(3).
(ii) Section 413(e) plan administrator
obligations. A section 413(e) plan
administrator must—
(A) Satisfy the notice requirements
described in paragraph (b) of this
section with respect to the participating
employer failure (taking into account
the rules for a combined first and
second notice described in paragraph
(d)(1)(ii) of this section);
(B) Implement a spinoff in accordance
with paragraph (d)(2) of this section if
an unresponsive participating employer
initiates a spinoff pursuant to paragraph
(c)(3) of this section; and
(C) Take the actions required in
paragraph (e) of this section if an
unresponsive participating employer
fails either to take appropriate remedial
action with respect to the participating
employer failure (as described in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section) or
initiate a spinoff (as described in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section) by the
final deadline described in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section.
(iii) Pooled plan providers. If the
section 413(e) plan has a pooled plan
provider during the plan year of the
participating employer failure, the
pooled plan provider must perform
substantially all of the administrative
duties that are required of the pooled
plan provider pursuant to paragraph
(a)(3)(ii) of this section for the plan year.
(3) Section 413(e) plans administered
by pooled plan providers—(i)
Requirements to be a pooled plan
provider. With respect to a section
413(e) plan, for purposes of this section,
a pooled plan provider is a person
who—
(A) Registers as a pooled plan
provider with the Commissioner by
satisfying the registration requirements
in section 3(44)(A)(ii) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
Public Law 93–406 (88 Stat. 829), as
amended (ERISA), in accordance with
guidance issued by the Department of
Labor,
(B) Is designated by the terms of the
plan as a named fiduciary (within the
meaning of section 402(a)(2) of ERISA),
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17237
as the plan administrator, and as the
person required to perform the
administrative duties described in
paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section,
(C) Acknowledges in writing that,
with respect to the plan, it is a named
fiduciary and the plan administrator,
and
(D) Is responsible for ensuring that all
persons who handle assets of, or who
are fiduciaries of, the plan are bonded
in accordance with section 412 of
ERISA.
(ii) Administrative duties required of
pooled plan provider—(A) In general. A
pooled plan provider is required to
perform all administrative duties that
are reasonably necessary to ensure that
the plan meets any applicable
requirement under ERISA or the Code
for a plan described in section 401(a) or
for a plan that consists of individual
retirement accounts described in section
408 (including accounts described in
section 408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)),
whichever is applicable, and each
participating employer takes actions,
including providing any disclosures or
other information, that are necessary for
the plan to meet the requirements
described in this paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(A).
(B) Administrative duties. The
administrative duties of a pooled plan
provider include, but are not limited to,
the following:
(1) Monitoring compliance with the
terms of the plan, and Code and ERISA
requirements;
(2) Maintaining accurate plan data,
including up-to-date participant and
beneficiary information;
(3) Performing and conducting
coverage, top-heavy, and discrimination
testing under sections 401(a)(4), (k), and
(m), 408(k), 410, and 416, if applicable;
(4) Processing all employee
transactions (such as investment
changes, loans, and distributions);
(5) Satisfying Code and ERISA
reporting and notice requirements (such
as reporting requirements under
sections 6047 and 6058 and notice
requirements under sections
401(k)(12)(D) and (13)(E) and 402(f));
and
(6) Updating the plan to reflect
statutory changes to the Code and
ERISA, to the extent the responsibility
for updating the plan document has
been delegated to the section 413(e)
plan administrator.
(iii) Aggregation rules. In determining
whether a person meets the
requirements to be a pooled plan
provider with respect to any section
413(e) plan, all persons who perform
services for the plan and who are treated
as a single employer under section
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
17238
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
414(b), (c), (m), or (o) are treated as one
person.
(4) Definitions. The following
definitions apply for purposes of this
section:
(i) Amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive
participating employer. Amounts
attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer are
plan assets and account balances held
by a section 413(e) plan on behalf of
employees of an unresponsive
participating employer that are
attributable to their employment with
the unresponsive participating
employer. If there is no separate
accounting for amounts that are
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer
and with other participating employers,
and a participant’s account balance
includes amounts that are attributable to
current employment with the
unresponsive participating employer
and to previous employment with one
or more other participating employers,
the entire account balance is treated as
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer.
On the other hand, if a participant’s
account balance includes amounts that
are attributable to current employment
with a participating employer that is not
the unresponsive participating employer
and to previous employment with the
unresponsive participating employer,
none of the account balance is treated as
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer.
For purposes of this paragraph (a)(4)(i),
a participant’s most recent employment
with a participating employer in the
section 413(e) plan will be treated as the
participant’s current employment.
(ii) Beneficiary. A beneficiary is a
beneficiary of a deceased employee or
an alternate payee (as defined in section
414(p)) with respect to an employee.
(iii) Employee. An employee is a
current or former employee of a
participating employer.
(iv) Failure to provide information. A
failure to provide information is a
failure of a participating employer (or
any person that is treated as a single
employer with that employer under
section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) to
respond in a timely manner to a
reasonable request by the section 413(e)
plan administrator for data, documents,
or any other information that the plan
administrator reasonably believes is
necessary to determine whether a
section 413(e) plan is in compliance
with a requirement of section 401(a) or
408 as it relates to the participating
employer.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
(v) Failure to take action. A failure to
take action is a failure of a participating
employer (or any person that is treated
as a single employer with that employer
under section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) to
comply in a timely manner with a
reasonable request by a section 413(e)
plan administrator to take action needed
for the section 413(e) plan to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as
it relates to the participating employer.
(vi) Participating employer. A
participating employer is one of the
employers maintaining a section 413(e)
plan.
(vii) Participating employer failure. A
participating employer failure in a
section 413(e) plan is a failure to
provide information (as defined in
paragraph (a)(4)(iv) of this section) or a
failure to take action (as defined in
paragraph (a)(4)(v) of this section).
(viii) Section 413(e) plan. A section
413(e) plan is a defined contribution
plan described in section 401(a) or a
plan that consists of individual
retirement accounts described in section
408 (including accounts described in
section 408(c), (k), or (p)) that—
(A) Is a section 413(c) plan (as defined
in § 1.413–2(a)(2)), and
(B) Is maintained by employers that
all have a common interest other than
having adopted the plan or has a pooled
plan provider as described in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section.
(ix) Section 413(e) plan administrator.
A section 413(e) plan administrator is
the plan administrator, within the
meaning of section 414(g), of a section
413(e) plan.
(x) Unresponsive participating
employer. An unresponsive
participating employer is a participating
employer that has a participating
employer failure.
(b) Notice. The section 413(e) plan
administrator satisfies the notice
requirements with respect to a
participating employer failure if it
satisfies the requirements of this
paragraph (b).
(1) First notice. The section 413(e)
plan administrator must provide notice
to the unresponsive participating
employer describing the participating
employer failure, the actions the
employer must take to remedy the
failure, and the employer’s option to
initiate a spinoff of amounts attributable
to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer to a separate
single-employer plan that is maintained
by the employer. In addition, the notice
must explain the consequences under
the terms of the plan if the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
failure nor initiates a spinoff, including
that participants who are employees of
the employer will not have any further
contributions made to the plan on their
behalf and that individuals who are
responsible for the failure may have
adverse tax consequences.
(2) Second notice. If, by the end of the
60-day period following the date the
first notice described in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section is provided, the
unresponsive participating employer
neither takes appropriate remedial
action with respect to the participating
employer failure nor initiates a spinoff,
then the section 413(e) plan
administrator must provide a second
notice to the employer. The second
notice must be provided no later than 30
days after the expiration of the 60-day
period described in the preceding
sentence. The second notice must
include the information required to be
included in the first notice. The second
notice must also state that if, within 60
days following the date the second
notice is provided, the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer
failure nor initiates a spinoff, then a
final notice describing the participating
employer failure and the consequences
of not correcting the failure will be
provided to participants who are
employees of the employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Department of
Labor.
(3) Final notice. If, by the end of the
60-day period following the date the
second notice described in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section is provided, the
unresponsive participating employer
neither takes appropriate remedial
action with respect to the participating
employer failure nor initiates a spinoff,
then the section 413(e) plan
administrator must provide a final
notice to the employer. The final notice
must be provided no later than 30 days
after the expiration of the 60-day period
described in the preceding sentence.
Within this time period, the final notice
must also be provided to participants
who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Office of
Enforcement of the Employee Benefits
Security Administration in the
Department of Labor (or its successor
office). The final notice must include
the information required to be included
in the first notice and specify the final
deadline for an unresponsive
participating employer to take action set
forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
The final notice must also state that the
notice is being provided to participants
who are employees of the unresponsive
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Department of
Labor.
(c) Actions by unresponsive
participating employer—(1) In general.
An unresponsive participating employer
takes appropriate remedial action with
respect to a participating employer
failure if it satisfies the requirements of
paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
Alternatively, an unresponsive
participating employer initiates a
spinoff for purposes of paragraph (a)(2)
of this section if the employer satisfies
the requirements of paragraph (c)(3) of
this section. The final deadline for an
unresponsive participating employer to
take one of these actions is 60 days after
the final notice described in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section is provided to the
employer.
(2) Appropriate remedial action—(i)
Appropriate remedial action with
respect to a failure to provide
information. If a participating employer
failure is a failure to provide
information, the unresponsive
participating employer takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to that failure if the employer
provides the data, documents, or other
information requested by a section
413(e) plan administrator (or arranges
for that information to be provided to
the section 413(e) plan administrator).
(ii) Appropriate remedial action with
respect to a failure to take action. If a
participating employer failure is a
failure to take action, the unresponsive
participating employer takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the failure if the employer (or
any person that is treated as a single
employer with the employer under
section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)), takes all
actions requested by the section 413(e)
plan administrator, such as making
corrective contributions, needed for the
section 413(e) plan to satisfy the
applicable requirements of section
401(a) or 408.
(3) Employer-initiated spinoff. After
receiving a notice described in
paragraph (b) of this section, an
unresponsive participating employer
initiates a spinoff pursuant to this
paragraph (c)(3) by directing the section
413(e) plan administrator to spin off
amounts attributable to the employees
of the unresponsive participating
employer to a separate single-employer
plan that is maintained by the employer
in a manner consistent with the terms
of the section 413(e) plan. If the section
413(e) plan is described in section
401(a), then the spun-off plan must also
be a section 401(a) plan. If the section
413(e) plan consists of individual
retirement accounts described in section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
408 (including accounts described in
section 408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)), then
the spun-off plan must also consist of
individual retirement accounts
described in section 408.
(d) Section 413(e) plan
administrator’s response to employer’s
remedial action—(1) Rules for a failure
to provide information that becomes a
failure to take action—(i) In general.
This paragraph (d)(1) provides rules that
apply if a failure to provide information
becomes a failure to take action. This
situation could occur if the
unresponsive participating employer
takes appropriate remedial action by
providing the information described in
paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section and,
based on this information, the section
413(e) plan administrator determines
that there is a failure to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as
it relates to that employer’s
participation in the section 413(e) plan.
If the section 413(e) plan administrator
makes a reasonable request for the
employer to take the actions needed to
satisfy the requirement, and the
employer does not comply in a timely
manner with that request, then, in
accordance with paragraph (a)(4)(v) of
this section, the failure to provide
information becomes a failure to take
action. In that case, the section 413(e)
plan will be eligible for the exception in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section with
respect to the failure to take action by
satisfying the conditions set forth in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section with
respect to that failure, taking into
account the rules of this paragraph
(d)(1).
(ii) Ability to combine first and
second notices in certain circumstances.
For purposes of applying paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(A) of this section in the case of
a failure to provide information that
becomes a failure to take action, notices
provided during the period that the
failure was a failure to provide
information are not taken into account.
For example, a final notice that the
section 413(e) plan administrator
provided in connection with the failure
to provide information would not satisfy
the final notice requirement with
respect to the failure to take action.
However, if the section 413(e) plan
administrator had provided the second
notice described in paragraph (b)(2) of
this section with respect to a failure to
provide information before it became a
failure to take action, then the section
413(e) plan administrator may satisfy
the requirement to send a first and
second notice with respect to the failure
to take action by sending a combined
first and second notice that includes the
information described in paragraph
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17239
(d)(1)(iii) of this section to the
unresponsive participating employer,
provided that—
(A) The section 413(e) plan
administrator’s request to take action
described in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this
section is made as soon as reasonably
practicable after the determination of
the failure to satisfy a requirement of
section 401(a) or 408 as it relates to that
employer’s participation in the section
413(e) plan; and
(B) The section 413(e) plan
administrator provides the combined
first and second notice with respect to
the failure to take action not later than
24 months following the end of the plan
year in which the failure to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408
occurs.
(iii) Contents of combined first and
second notice. To satisfy the
requirements of a combined first and
second notice described in paragraph
(d)(1)(ii) of this section, the notice
must—
(A) Describe the participating
employer failure, the actions the
unresponsive participating employer
would need to take to remedy the
failure, and the employer’s option to
initiate a spinoff of amounts attributable
to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer to a separate
single-employer plan that is maintained
by the employer,
(B) Explain the consequences under
the terms of the plan if the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer
failure nor initiates a spinoff, including
that participants who are employees of
the employer will not have any further
contributions made to the plan on their
behalf and that individuals who are
responsible for the failure may have
adverse tax consequences, and
(C) Specify that if, within 60 days
following the date the combined first
and second notice is provided, the
unresponsive participating employer
neither takes appropriate remedial
action with respect to the participating
employer failure nor initiates a spinoff,
then a notice describing the
participating employer failure and the
consequences of not correcting the
failure will be provided to participants
who are employees of the employer (and
their beneficiaries) and to the
Department of Labor.
(2) Implementing employer-initiated
spinoff. If an unresponsive participating
employer initiates a spinoff pursuant to
paragraph (c)(3) of this section by
directing the section 413(e) plan
administrator to spin off amounts
attributable to the employees of the
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
17240
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
unresponsive participating employer to
a separate single-employer plan
established and maintained by the
employer, or to a separate plan
sponsored by the employer that consists
of individual retirement accounts, then
the section 413(e) plan administrator
must implement and complete the
spinoff as soon as reasonably practicable
after the employer initiates the spinoff.
The section 413(e) plan administrator is
treated as satisfying the requirement of
the prior sentence if the spinoff is
completed within 180 days of the date
on which the unresponsive participating
employer initiates the spinoff.
(e) Required actions following
employer’s failure to meet deadline—(1)
In general—(i) Deadline for action. If, by
the final deadline described in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the
unresponsive participating employer
neither takes appropriate remedial
action pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of
this section nor initiates a spinoff
pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this
section, then the requirements of
paragraph (e)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this
section must be satisfied.
(ii) Requirements for section 413(e)
plan administrator. As soon as
reasonably practicable after the final
deadline described in paragraph (e)(1)(i)
of this section, the section 413(e) plan
administrator must—
(A) Stop accepting contributions from
the unresponsive participating employer
and its employees;
(B) Provide notice to participants who
are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) as described in paragraph
(e)(2) of this section; and
(C) Provide participants who are
employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) with an election regarding
treatment of their plan accounts to the
extent provided in paragraph (e)(3) or
(4) of this section.
(iii) Timing of distributions. The
section 413(e) plan administrator must
distribute benefits as soon as
administratively feasible following an
individual’s election that is made
pursuant to paragraph (e)(3) or (4) of
this section or following the section
413(e) plan administrator’s
determination that it is not required to
provide an individual with an election
pursuant to paragraph (e)(4)(iv) of this
section.
(2) Contents of notification. The
notice required under paragraph
(e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section must include
the information described in this
paragraph (e)(2).
(i) No contributions. The notice must
state that no further contributions will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
be made to the section 413(e) plan on
behalf of participants who are
employees of the unresponsive
participating employer.
(ii) Full vesting. The notice must state
that participants who are employees of
the unresponsive participating employer
have a nonforfeitable right to amounts
credited to their accounts that are
attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer.
(iii) Information about disposition of
accounts. The notice must state that a
participant who is an employee of the
unresponsive participating employer
(or, if applicable, any beneficiary of the
participant) will receive additional
information regarding the disposition of
the participant’s or beneficiary’s
account.
(3) Election for direct rollover or to
remain in section 413(e) plan—(i)
General rule. Except as provided in
paragraph (e)(4) of this section, a section
413(e) plan administrator must provide
participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer
(and their beneficiaries) with an election
to have amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive
participating employer—
(A) Subject to the rules of paragraph
(e)(5) of this section, directly rolled over
to an eligible retirement plan within the
meaning of section 402(c)(8); or
(B) Remain in the section 413(e) plan.
(ii) Default. An individual who fails
to make an affirmative election
described in paragraph (e)(3)(i)(A) of
this section is treated as having elected
to have the amounts described in
paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section remain
in the section 413(e) plan.
(iii) Individuals remaining in section
413(e) plan. If, pursuant to paragraph
(e)(3)(i)(B) of this section, an individual
elects to have the amounts described in
paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section remain
in the section 413(e) plan, those
amounts must remain in the section
413(e) plan until a distribution is made
under the terms of the plan without
regard to section 413(e). To determine
whether a participant is entitled to a
distribution upon severance from
employment under the terms of the plan
without regard to section 413(e), a
section 413(e) plan administrator may
rely on the participant’s representation
that the participant has experienced a
severance from employment unless the
plan administrator has actual
knowledge to the contrary.
(4) Rules for individuals subject to
mandatory distributions—(i) No election
to remain in plan. The option to remain
in the plan described in paragraph
(e)(3)(i)(B) of this section with respect to
amounts described in paragraph (e)(3)(i)
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of this section is not available to an
individual if the terms of the plan
would have provided for a mandatory
distribution of those amounts had the
participant experienced a severance
from employment. Instead, those
amounts must be distributed from the
section 413(e) plan.
(ii) Mandatory distributions subject to
automatic rollover. The portion of the
mandatory distribution that is an
eligible rollover distribution subject to
section 401(a)(31)(B) must be directly
rolled over to an eligible retirement
plan. In accordance with section
401(a)(31)(B), the section 413(e) plan
administrator must provide the
individual with an election for the
eligible retirement plan to be—
(A) An eligible retirement plan chosen
by the individual, or
(B) An individual retirement plan of
a designated trustee or issuer.
(iii) Mandatory distributions not
subject to automatic rollover. For the
portion of the mandatory distribution
that is an eligible rollover distribution
subject to section 401(a)(31)(A) (but not
section 401(a)(31)(B)), the section 413(e)
plan administrator must provide the
individual with an election in
accordance with section 401(a)(31)(A)
for that portion to be—
(A) Rolled over directly to an eligible
retirement plan chosen by the
individual; or
(B) If no eligible retirement plan is
chosen pursuant to paragraph
(e)(4)(iii)(A) of this section, paid directly
to the individual.
(iv) Individuals who are ineligible for
direct rollover. For any portion of a
mandatory distribution that is not
subject to the requirement to offer a
direct rollover option under section
401(a)(31), the section 413(e) plan
administrator must pay the individual.
For example, a section 413(e) plan
administrator is not required to provide
an election to an individual with an
account balance of less than $200 if,
consistent with section 411(a)(11) and
§ 1.401(a)(31)–1, Q&A–11, plan terms
require that mandatory distributions of
less than $200 be paid directly to
distributees.
(5) Amounts not eligible for rollover.
If an individual makes an election to
have an amount described in paragraph
(e)(3)(i) of this section directly rolled
over to an eligible retirement plan
pursuant to paragraph (e)(3) or (4) of
this section, and a portion of the amount
is not an eligible rollover distribution
described in section 402(c)(4), then that
portion must be paid directly to the
individual. For example, the portion of
a distribution that would be a required
minimum distribution under section
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
401(a)(9) must be paid directly to the
individual.
(6) Effective opportunity to make
election. Any election that is provided
to an individual pursuant to paragraph
(e)(3) or (4) of this section must include
an effective opportunity for the
individual to make the election.
Whether an individual has an effective
opportunity to make an election is
determined based on all the relevant
facts and circumstances, including the
adequacy of notice of the availability of
the election, the period of time during
which the election may be made, and
any other conditions on the election.
(f) Other rules—(1) Form of notices
and elections. Any notice provided or
election made pursuant to paragraph (b)
or (e) of this section must be in written
or electronic form. For notices and
elections provided to or made by
participants and beneficiaries, see
generally § 1.401(a)–21 for rules
permitting the use of electronic media to
provide applicable notices and make
participant elections with respect to
retirement plans.
(2) Status of spun-off plan. In the case
of any plan that is spun off in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this
section, any participating employer
failure that would have caused the
section 413(e) plan to fail to meet the
requirements of section 401(a) or 408, as
applicable, but for the application of the
exception set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section, will result in the spun-off
plan failing to meet those requirements.
(3) Responsible parties. A
participating employer demonstrates a
lack of commitment to compliance if the
participating employer fails to take
appropriate remedial action pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2) of this section or
initiate a spinoff pursuant to paragraph
(c)(3) of this section by the final
deadline described in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section. The IRS reserves the right
to pursue appropriate remedies under
the Code against any party (such as the
owner of the participating employer)
who is responsible for the failure to
satisfy the requirements of section
401(a) or 408, as applicable, even in the
party’s capacity as a participant or
beneficiary (such as by not treating a
section 413(e) plan distribution made
with respect to the owner of a
participating employer as an eligible
rollover distribution).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Mar 25, 2022
Jkt 256001
(g) Applicability date. This section
applies beginning on [PUBLICATION
DATE OF FINAL RULE].
Douglas W. O’Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2022–06005 Filed 3–25–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
17241
Comments’’ portion of the
section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about this document, call or
email John Stone, Office of Navigation
Systems (CG–NAV–2), Coast Guard;
telephone 202–372–1093, email
John.M.Stone2@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Table of Contents for Preamble
Coast Guard, Homeland
Security (DHS).
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
II. Abbreviations
III. Basis and Purpose
A. Purpose of the Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)
B. Statutory Authority
IV. Background
A. ‘‘Sunsetting’’ of Raster Navigational
Charts
B. Transition to Electronic Navigational
Charts, and Electronic Chart Display and
Information Systems
C. Existing Chart Carriage and Associated
Navigational Equipment Carriage
Regulations
D. Current Electronic Chart Systems
Carriage and Equivalency Guidance
V. ANPRM Discussion
VI. Information Requested
The Coast Guard seeks public
input regarding the modification of the
chart and navigational equipment
carriage requirements in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR). This advance
notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) outlines the Coast Guard’s
broad strategy to revise its CFR chart
and navigational equipment carriage
requirements to implement statutory
electronic-chart-use provisions for
commercial U.S.-flagged vessels and
certain foreign-flagged vessels operating
in the waters of the United States. This
ANPRM is necessary to obtain
additional information from the public
before issuing a notice of proposed
rulemaking. It will allow us to verify the
extent of the requirements for the rule,
such as how widely electronic charts
currently are used, which types of
vessels are using them, the appropriate
equipment requirements for different
vessel classes, and where the vessels
operate, and will thereby allow us to
tailor electronic chart requirements to
vessel class and location.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 27, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2021–0291 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
The Coast Guard views public
participation as essential to effective
rulemaking, and will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. Your comment can
help shape the outcome of this
rulemaking. If you submit a comment,
please include the docket number for
this rulemaking, indicate the specific
section of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision Making Portal at
www.regulations.gov. To do so, go to
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0291 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this document
in the Search Results column, and click
on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your
material by using www.regulations.gov,
call or email the person in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this advance notice of proposed
rulemaking document (ANPRM) for
alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this ANPRM
as being available in the docket, find the
docket as described in the previous
paragraph, and then select ‘‘Supporting
& Related Material’’ in the Document
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 164
46 CFR Parts 25, 26, 28, 32, 35, 77, 78,
96, 97, 108, 109, 121, 130, 140, 167, 169,
184, 195, and 196
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0291]
RIN 1625–AC74
Electronic Chart and Navigational
Equipment Carriage Requirements
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17225-17241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06005]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-121508-18]
RIN 1545-BO97
Multiple Employer Plans
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing;
withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document sets forth proposed regulations relating to
certain multiple employer plans (MEPs) described in the Internal
Revenue Code (the ``Code''). The proposed regulations provide an
exception, if certain requirements are met, to the application of the
``unified plan rule'' for MEPs in the event of a failure by one or more
employers participating in the plan to take actions required of them to
satisfy the applicable requirements of the Code. These proposed
regulations would affect certain MEPs, participants in those MEPs (and
their beneficiaries), employers participating in those MEPs, and plan
administrators of those MEPs. This document also withdraws proposed
regulations published in the Federal Register on July 3, 2019, amending
the application of the unified plan rule to MEPs and provides a notice
of a public hearing.
DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received by May 27, 2022.
A public hearing on these proposed regulations has been scheduled for
Wednesday, June 22, 2022, at 10 a.m. EST. Requests to speak and
outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing must be
received by May 27, 2022. If no outlines are received by May 27, 2022,
the public hearing will be cancelled. Requests to attend the public
hearing must be received by 5 p.m. EST on Friday, June 17, 2022. The
telephonic hearing will be made accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for special assistance during the telephonic hearing must be
received by Thursday, June 16, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-121508-
18) by following the online instructions for submitting comments. Once
submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited
or withdrawn. The IRS expects to have limited personnel available to
process public comments that are submitted on paper through mail. Until
further notice, any comments submitted on paper will be considered to
the extent practicable. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS will publish for public availability any
comment submitted electronically, and to the extent practicable on
paper, to its public docket. Send paper submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR
(REG-121508-18), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604,
Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044.
For those requesting to speak during the hearing, send an outline
of topic submissions electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-121508-18).
Individuals who want to testify (by telephone) at the public
hearing must send an email to [email protected] to receive the
telephone number and access code for the hearing. The subject line of
the email must contain the regulation number REG-121508-18 and the word
TESTIFY. For example, the subject line may say: Request to TESTIFY at
Hearing for REG-121508-18. The email should include a copy of the
speaker's public comments and outline of topics. Individuals who want
to attend the public hearing by telephone must also send an email to
[email protected] to receive the telephone number and access code
for the hearing. The subject line of the email must contain the
regulation number REG-121508-18 and the word ATTEND. For example, the
subject line may say: Request to ATTEND Hearing for REG-121508-18. To
request special assistance during the telephonic hearing contact the
Publications and Regulations Branch of the Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration) by sending an email to
[email protected] (preferred) or by telephone at (202) 317-5177
(not a toll-free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the regulations, Pamela
Kinard at (202) 317-6000 or Tom Morgan at (202) 317-6700; concerning
submission of comments or requests for a public hearing, Regina Johnson
(202) 317-5177 (not toll-free numbers) or by sending an email to
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document sets forth proposed amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under section 413(c) of the Code and
proposed regulations under section 413(e) of the Code. This document
also withdraws proposed regulations under section 413(c) that were
published in the Federal Register on July 3, 2019 (84 FR 31777)
(section 413(c) proposed regulations).
I. General Rules Relating to MEPs Including the Unified Plan Rule
Section 413(c) provides rules for a plan maintained by more than
one employer.\1\ A plan described in section
[[Page 17226]]
413(c) often is referred to as a multiple employer plan (MEP) or a
section 413(c) plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 210 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, Public Law 93-406 (88 Stat. 829), as amended (ERISA), also
provides rules relating to plans maintained by more than one
employer. Similar to section 413(c) of the Code, section 210(a) of
ERISA states that the minimum participation standards, minimum
vesting standards, and benefit accrual requirements under sections
202, 203, and 204 of ERISA, respectively, shall be applied as if all
employees of each of the employers were employed by a single
employer. Under section 101 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (5
U.S.C. App.), the Secretary of the Treasury has interpretive
jurisdiction over section 413 of the Code, as well as ERISA section
210.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final regulations under section 413 were published in the Federal
Register on November 9, 1979, 44 FR 65061 (the final section 413
regulations). The final section 413 regulations apply to MEPs described
in section 413(c) and to collectively bargained plans described in
section 413(b) (plans that are maintained pursuant to certain
collective-bargaining agreements between employee representatives and
one or more employers).
Pursuant to section 413(c) and the final section 413 regulations,
all of the employers maintaining a MEP (participating employers) are
treated as a single employer for purposes of certain Code requirements,
which include the following requirements:
Under section 413(c)(1) and 26 CFR1.413-2(b), the rules
addressing plan participation under section 410(a) and the regulations
thereunder are applied as if all employees of each of the employers
that maintain the plan are employed by a single employer;
under section 413(c)(2) and Sec. 1.413-2(c), in
determining whether a MEP is, with respect to each participating
employer, a plan for the exclusive benefit of its employees (and their
beneficiaries), all of the employees participating in the plan are
treated as employees of each such employer; and
under section 413(c)(3) and Sec. 1.413-2(d), the minimum
vesting standards under section 411 are applied as if all employers
that maintain the plan constitute a single employer.
Other rules are applied separately to each participating employer.
For example, under Sec. 1.413-2(a)(3)(ii), the minimum coverage
requirements of section 410(b) generally are applied to a MEP on an
employer-by-employer basis.
A plan is not described in section 413(c) unless it is maintained
by more than one employer and is a single plan under section 414(l).
See Sec. Sec. 1.413-2(a)(2)(i) and 1.413-1(a)(2). Under Sec.
1.414(l)-1(b), a plan is a single plan if and only if, on an ongoing
basis, all of the plan assets are available to pay benefits to
employees who are covered by the plan and their beneficiaries.
Under Sec. 1.413-2(a)(3)(iv), the qualification of a MEP ``is
determined with respect to all employers maintaining the section 413(c)
plan'' (sometimes referred to as the unified plan rule). Therefore, the
failure by one employer maintaining the plan (or by the plan itself) to
satisfy an applicable qualification requirement will result in the
disqualification of the section 413(c) plan for all employers
maintaining the plan.
The section 413(c) proposed regulations, which are being withdrawn,
would have created an exception to the unified plan rule for certain
defined contribution MEPs. The exception generally would have been
available, provided that certain conditions were satisfied, if a
participating employer in a MEP was solely responsible for a
qualification failure that the employer was unable or unwilling to
correct, or if a participating employer failed to comply with a plan
administrator's request for information about a qualification failure
that the plan administrator reasonably believed might exist.
Written comments responding to the section 413(c) proposed
regulations were received, and a public hearing was held on December
11, 2019. The provisions of these proposed regulations were informed by
the comments received with respect to the section 413(c) proposed
regulations.
II. SECURE Act Provisions Related to MEPs
Section 101(a) of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement
Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act), which was enacted on December 20,
2019, as Division O of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2020, Public Law 116-94 (133 Stat. 2534), added section 413(e) to the
Code. Section 413(e) creates a statutory exception to the unified plan
rule for certain types of MEPs and directs the Secretary to issue
guidance that is appropriate to carry out that provision. A MEP is
eligible for the exception to the unified plan rule if it is a section
413(c) defined contribution plan \2\ described in section 401(a) or
consists of individual retirement accounts described in section 408
(including by reason of section 408(c)),\3\ provided that the MEP
either is maintained by employers that have a ``common interest'' or
has a ``pooled plan provider.'' \4\ Section 413(e)(1) provides that,
with certain exceptions, this type of MEP will not be treated as
failing to meet the applicable requirements under the Code merely
because one or more employers of employees covered by the plan fail to
take actions that are required for the plan to meet those requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Although section 403(b) plans are defined contribution
plans, they are not plans described in section 401(a) or 408.
Therefore, section 413(e)(1) does not apply to section 403(b) plans.
\3\ Prior to the SECURE Act, section 413(c)(2) of the Code
provided, ``For purposes of section 401(a), in determining whether
the plan of an employer is for the exclusive benefit of his
employees and their beneficiaries all plan participants shall be
considered his employees.'' Section 101(a)(2) of the SECURE Act
amended section 413(c)(2) of the Code so that it applies for
purposes of section 408(c) of the Code in addition to section 401(a)
of the Code.
\4\ Section 101(c) of the SECURE Act also amended title I of
ERISA to introduce the term ``pooled plan provider,'' as well as the
term ``pooled employer plan'' for a plan with a pooled plan
provider. See ERISA sections 3(44) and 3(43), respectively. These
ERISA provisions do not address compliance under the Code for plans
described in section 401(a) or 408, but the requirements for pooled
plan providers and pooled employer plans are otherwise similar to
the requirements in section 413(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 413(e)(2)(A) provides that section 413(e)(1) will not apply
unless the terms of the plan provide that, in the case of any employer
in the plan failing to take the actions described in section 413(e)(1),
the assets of the plan attributable to employees of that employer (or
beneficiaries of those employees) will be transferred to a plan
maintained only by that employer (or its successor), to an eligible
retirement plan as defined in section 402(c)(8)(B) for each individual
whose account is transferred, or to any other arrangement that the
Secretary determines is appropriate, unless the Secretary determines it
is in the best interests of those employees (and their beneficiaries)
to retain the assets in the plan. Section 413(e)(2)(A) also states that
section 413(e)(1) will not apply unless the terms of the plan provide
that, in the case of any employer failing to take the actions described
in section 413(e)(1), the employer (and not the plan or any other
employer in the plan) will be liable for any liabilities with respect
to the plan attributable to employees of that employer (or their
beneficiaries), except to the extent provided by the Secretary.
Section 413(e)(2)(B) provides that, if the pooled plan provider of
a plan described in section 413(e)(1)(B) does not perform substantially
all of the administrative duties required by section 413(e)(3)(A)(i)
for any plan year, the Secretary may provide that the determination as
to whether the plan meets the applicable Code requirements for a plan
described in section 401(a) or a plan that consists of individual
retirement accounts described in section 408 (including by reason of
section 408(c)), whichever is applicable, will be
[[Page 17227]]
made in the same manner as would be made without regard to section
413(e)(1).
Section 413(e)(3)(A) provides that, for purposes of section 413(e),
the term pooled plan provider means, with respect to any plan, a person
who:
Is designated by the terms of the plan as a named
fiduciary (within the meaning of section 402(a)(2) of ERISA), as the
plan administrator, and as the person responsible to perform specified
administrative duties;
registers as a pooled plan provider with the Secretary,
and provides such other information to the Secretary as the Secretary
may require, before beginning operations as a pooled plan provider;
acknowledges in writing that such person is a named
fiduciary (within the meaning of section 402(a)(2) of ERISA), and the
plan administrator, with respect to the plan; and
is responsible for ensuring that all persons who handle
assets of, or who are fiduciaries of, the plan are bonded in accordance
with section 412 of ERISA.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Department of Labor has issued guidance on the
application of the bonding provision in its final rule on
registration requirements for pooled plan providers. See 85 FR
72934, 72936 n.5 (November 16, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The administrative duties for which the pooled plan provider is
responsible are the duties (including conducting proper testing with
respect to the plan and the employees of each employer in the plan)
that are reasonably necessary to ensure that (1) the plan meets any
requirements under ERISA or the Code applicable to a plan described in
section 401(a) or to a plan that consists of individual retirement
accounts described in section 408, whichever is applicable, and (2)
each employer in the plan takes actions that the Secretary or the
pooled plan provider determines are necessary for the plan to meet
those requirements, including providing to the pooled plan provider any
disclosures or other information that the Secretary may require or that
the pooled plan provider otherwise determines are necessary to
administer the plan or to allow the plan to meet the requirements of
section 401(a) or 408. In determining whether a person meets the
requirements to be a pooled plan provider with respect to any plan, all
persons who perform services for the plan and who are treated as a
single employer under section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o) are treated as
one person.
Section 413(e)(3)(B) provides that the Secretary may perform
audits, examinations, and investigations of pooled plan providers as
may be necessary to enforce and carry out the purposes of section
413(e). Section 413(e)(3)(D) provides that each employer in a plan with
a pooled plan provider is treated as the plan sponsor with respect to
the portion of the plan attributable to employees of the employer (or
their beneficiaries), except with respect to the administrative duties
of the pooled plan provider described in section 413(e)(3)(A)(i).
Section 413(e)(4)(A) directs the Secretary to issue guidance that
the Secretary determines appropriate to carry out section 413(e),
including guidance: (i) Identifying the administrative duties and other
actions required to be performed by a pooled plan provider under
section 413(e); (ii) describing the procedures to be taken to terminate
a plan which fails to meet the requirements to be a plan described in
section 413(e)(1), including the proper treatment of, and actions
needed to be taken by, any employer in the plan and the assets and
liabilities of the plan attributable to employees of the employer (or
their beneficiaries); and (iii) identifying appropriate cases to which
the rules of section 413(e)(2)(A) will apply to employers in the plan
failing to take the actions described in section 413(e)(1), taking into
account whether the failure of an employer or pooled plan provider to
provide any disclosures or other information, or to take any other
action, necessary to administer a plan or to allow a plan to meet
requirements applicable to the plan under section 401(a) or 408,
whichever is applicable, has continued over a period of time that
demonstrates a lack of commitment to compliance.
Section 413(e)(4)(B) states that an employer or pooled plan
provider will not be treated as failing to meet a requirement of
guidance issued pursuant to section 413(e)(4) if, before the guidance
is issued, the employer or pooled plan provider complies in good faith
with a reasonable interpretation of the provisions of section 413(e) to
which the guidance relates.
Section 413(e)(5) requires the Secretary to publish model plan
language which meets the requirements of section 413(e) and section
3(43) and (44) of ERISA and which may be adopted in order for a plan to
be treated as a plan that has a pooled plan provider.
Section 101(e)(2) of the SECURE Act states that nothing in the
amendments made by section 101(a) of the SECURE Act shall be construed
as limiting the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury or the
Secretary's delegate (determined without regard to such amendments) to
provide for the proper treatment of a failure to meet any requirement
applicable under the Code with respect to one employer (and its
employees) in a multiple employer plan.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Overview
The proposed regulations provide guidance to implement the
exception to the unified plan rule for section 413(e) plans (unified
plan exception). The proposed regulations define a section 413(e) plan
as a defined contribution plan described in section 401(a), or a plan
that consists of individual retirement accounts described in section
408 (including accounts described in sections 408(c), 408(k), or
408(p)), that is a section 413(c) plan (as defined in Sec. 1.413-
2(a)(2)) and that (1) is maintained by employers that have a common
interest other than having adopted the plan or (2) has a pooled plan
provider. Because a section 413(e) plan is a type of section 413(c)
plan, a section 413(e) plan is subject to all of the rules of section
413(c), including the rules for participation in section 413(c)(1) and
the rules for vesting in section 413(c)(3).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For rules relating to section 413(c) plans, see Sec. 1.413-
2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These proposed regulations do not provide guidance on whether a
section 413(e) plan is maintained by employers that have a common
interest other than having adopted the plan. The Treasury Department
and the IRS request comments on what (if any) guidance would be helpful
regarding whether employers have such a common interest, including how
any guidance should be coordinated with guidance issued by the
Department of Labor. An employer that desires to participate in a
section 413(e) plan may choose to participate in a defined contribution
plan described in section 401(a) or 408 with a pooled plan provider in
order to ensure that the plan is a plan described in section 413(e).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Department of Labor has advised the Treasury Department
and the IRS that an arrangement with a pooled plan provider can
qualify as a pooled employer plan under section 3(43)(A) of ERISA
without regard to whether the arrangement could be structured as a
plan maintained by employers that have a common interest other than
having adopted the plan. See also 86 FR 51488, 51490, n.12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the unified plan exception, a section 413(e) plan is not
treated as failing to meet the requirements under the Code applicable
to a plan described in section 401(a) or to a plan that consists of
individual retirement accounts described in section 408 (including
accounts described in section 408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)), whichever is
applicable, merely because of a
[[Page 17228]]
participating employer failure.\8\ For the unified plan exception to
apply, the proposed regulations provide that certain conditions must be
satisfied, including that the section 413(e) plan administrator must
notify the participating employer of the participating employer failure
and, in certain circumstances, transfer amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive participating employer to a separate plan
maintained by the employer or provide an election to certain
participants to remain in the plan or to have their accounts
transferred to another eligible retirement plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Section 1.416-1, Q&A G-2, includes a rule similar to the
unified plan rule, providing that a failure by a MEP to satisfy
section 416 with respect to employees of one participating employer
means that all participating employers in the MEP are maintaining a
plan that is not a qualified plan. This rule is based on the unified
plan rule in Sec. 1.413-2(a)(3)(iv). Therefore, if a section 413(e)
plan has an unresponsive employer that fails to satisfy section 416
and the section 413(e) plan meets the conditions for the exception
to the unified plan rule, the section 413(e) plan will not be
disqualified for the section 416 failure. The rules in Sec. 1.416-1
are outside the scope of these proposed regulations, but the
Treasury Department and the IRS intend to address the topic in a
broader guidance project updating the regulations under section 416.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to defining a section 413(e) plan, the proposed
regulations provide a number of other definitions, including the
following: (1) A section 413(e) plan administrator is the plan
administrator, within the meaning of section 414(g), of a section
413(e) plan; (2) a participating employer is one of the employers
maintaining a section 413(e) plan; (3) an unresponsive participating
employer is a participating employer that has a participating employer
failure; (4) an employee is a current or former employee of a
participating employer; (5) a beneficiary is a beneficiary of a
deceased employee or an alternate payee (as defined in section 414(p))
with respect to an employee; and (6) a participating employer is one of
the employers maintaining a section 413(e) plan. As discussed in the
following paragraphs, the proposed regulations also include definitions
for the following terms: (1) Participating employer failure, (2)
amounts attributable to the employees of the unresponsive participating
employer, and (3) pooled plan provider.
The proposed regulations define a participating employer failure in
a section 413(e) plan as a failure to provide information or a failure
to take action. A failure to provide information is defined as a
failure of a participating employer (or any person that is treated as a
single employer with that employer under section 414(b), (c), (m), or
(o)) to respond in a timely manner to a reasonable request by the
section 413(e) plan administrator for data, documents, or any other
information that the plan administrator reasonably believes is
necessary to determine whether a section 413(e) plan is in compliance
with a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as it relates to the
participating employer. A failure to take action is defined as a
failure of a participating employer (or any person that is treated as a
single employer with that employer under section 414(b), (c), (m), or
(o)) to comply in a timely manner with a reasonable request by a
section 413(e) plan administrator to take action needed for the section
413(e) plan to satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as it
relates to the participating employer. For purposes of these
definitions, a section 413(e) plan administrator's request would not be
considered reasonable if it fails to give the employer sufficient time
to provide information or take action (and, consequently, a
participating employer's failure to respond to an unreasonable request
would not be considered a participating employer failure).
The proposed regulations define amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive participating employer as plan assets and
account balances held by a section 413(e) plan on behalf of employees
of an unresponsive participating employer that are attributable to
their employment with the unresponsive participating employer. The
proposed regulations provide rules that apply if there is no separate
accounting for amounts that are attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer and with other participating
employers.\9\ If a participant's account balance includes amounts that
are attributable to current employment with the unresponsive
participating employer and to previous employment with one or more
other participating employers, the entire account balance is treated as
attributable to employment with the unresponsive participating
employer. On the other hand, if a participant's account balance
includes amounts that are attributable to current employment with a
participating employer that is not the unresponsive participating
employer and to previous employment with the unresponsive participating
employer, none of the account balance is treated as attributable to
employment with the unresponsive participating employer. For purposes
of this definition, a participant's most recent employment with a
participating employer in the MEP will be treated as the participant's
current employment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In defining the amounts attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer, the references in these
proposed regulations to circumstances in which there is no
``separate accounting'' are not intended to address the
recordkeeping obligations under Title I of ERISA, including sections
107 and 209 of ERISA, of an employer, plan administrator, or other
plan fiduciary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposed regulations, the term pooled plan provider
means, with respect to any plan, a person who: (1) Registers as a
pooled plan provider with the Commissioner; (2) is designated by the
terms of the plan as a named fiduciary (within the meaning of section
402(a)(2) of ERISA), as the plan administrator, and as the person
required to perform certain administrative duties; (3) acknowledges in
writing that, with respect to the plan, it is a named fiduciary and the
plan administrator; and (4) is responsible for ensuring that all
persons who handle assets of, or who are fiduciaries of, the plan are
bonded in accordance with section 412 of ERISA.
The requirement to register as a pooled plan provider with the
Commissioner is fulfilled by satisfying the parallel requirement under
ERISA to register as a pooled plan provider with the Department of
Labor. On November 16, 2020, the Department of Labor issued final
regulations under section 3(44) of ERISA (29 CFR 2510.3-44) with
respect to the registration requirement. See 85 FR 72934.
Consistent with section 413(e)(3)(A)(i), the proposed regulations
require a pooled plan provider to perform all administrative duties
that are reasonably necessary to ensure that: (1) The plan meets any
applicable requirement under ERISA or the Code for a plan described in
section 401(a) or for a plan that consists of individual retirement
accounts described in section 408 (including accounts described in
section 408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)), whichever is applicable, and (2)
each participating employer takes actions, including providing any
disclosures or other information, that are necessary for the plan to
meet those requirements.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In determining whether a person meets the requirements to
be a pooled plan provider with respect to any section 413(e) plan,
all persons who perform services for the plan and who are treated as
a single employer under section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o) are treated
as one person.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The administrative duties of a pooled plan provider include, but
are not limited to, the following:
(1) Monitoring compliance with the terms of the plan, and Code and
ERISA requirements;
[[Page 17229]]
(2) Maintaining accurate plan data, including providing up-to-date
participant and beneficiary information;
(3) Performing and conducting coverage, top-heavy, and
discrimination testing under sections 401(a)(4), (k), and (m), 408(k),
410, and 416, if applicable;
(4) Processing all employee transactions (such as investment
changes, loans, and distributions);
(5) Satisfying Code and ERISA reporting and notice requirements
(such as reporting requirements under sections 6047 (Form 1099-R,
``Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing
Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc.'') and 6058 (Form 5500, ``Annual
Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan''), and notice requirements
under sections 401(k)(12)(D) and (13)(E) and 402(f)); and
(6) Updating the plan to reflect statutory changes to the Code and
ERISA, to the extent the responsibility for updating the plan document
has been delegated to the section 413(e) plan administrator.
II. Conditions for Application of Exception to Unified Plan Rule
A. In General
The proposed regulations provide that, under the unified plan
exception, a section 413(e) plan is not disqualified on account of a
participating employer failure, provided that the plan satisfies
certain conditions, which are described in Parts II.B through II.G of
this Explanation of Provisions.
B. Plan Language
The proposed regulations provide that the terms of the section
413(e) plan document must include language describing the procedures
that will be followed to address a participating employer failure,
including a description of the notices that the section 413(e) plan
administrator will send in the case of a participating employer failure
(described in Part II.C of this Explanation of Provisions, titled
``Notice Requirements''). The plan must also state that the section
413(e) plan administrator will send the first notice (or, if
applicable, the combined first and second notice) by specified
deadlines that depend on the type of failure. With respect to a failure
to provide information, the specified deadline for sending the first
notice is 12 months following the end of the plan year for which the
information is necessary to determine whether the section 413(e) plan
is in compliance with a requirement of section 401(a) or 408. With
respect to a failure to take action, the specified deadline is 24
months following the end of the plan year in which the failure to
satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 occurs.
In addition, the plan terms must describe the actions that the
section 413(e) plan administrator will take if, by the end of the 60-
day period following the date the final notice is provided, the
unresponsive participating employer does not take appropriate remedial
action with respect to the failure or initiate a spinoff of amounts
attributable to the employees of the unresponsive participating
employer to a separate single-employer plan that is maintained by the
employer. The terms of the section 413(e) plan must also provide that
if an unresponsive participating employer does not either take
appropriate remedial action or initiate a spinoff by that deadline,
participants who are employees of the unresponsive participating
employer have a nonforfeitable right to the amounts credited to their
accounts that are attributable to employment with the unresponsive
participating employer, determined in the same manner as if the plan
had terminated pursuant to section 411(d)(3). In connection with the
finalization of these proposed regulations, the Treasury Department and
the IRS intend to publish guidance in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
setting forth model language that may be used for this purpose.
The section 413(c) proposed regulations provided that a plan was
ineligible for the unified plan exception if the plan was under
examination before the first notice with respect to a participating
employer failure was provided to an unresponsive participating
employer. These proposed regulations do not include that condition.
However, see the discussion in Part VI of this Explanation of
Provisions, titled ``Coordination with EPCRS,'' on correcting a failure
to send the first notice by the specified deadline, including when a
plan is under examination.
C. Notice Requirements
The proposed regulations require the section 413(e) plan
administrator to provide up to three notices regarding a participating
employer failure to the unresponsive participating employer; with the
final notice, if applicable, also being provided to participants who
are employees of the employer (and their beneficiaries) and the
Department of Labor.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ As described in Part II.E.2 of this Explanation of
Provisions, titled ``Failure to Provide Information that Becomes a
Failure to Take Action,'' if the notices relate to a failure to
provide information that becomes a failure to take action, then a
new series of notices may be required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first notice must describe the participating employer failure
(or failures), as well as the actions the unresponsive participating
employer must take to remedy the failure, and the employer's option to
initiate a spinoff of amounts attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer to a separate single-employer plan
that is maintained by the employer. The first notice must also explain
the consequences under the terms of the plan if the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer failure nor initiates a spinoff,
including that participants who are employees of the employer will not
have any further contributions made to the plan on their behalf and
that individuals who are responsible for the failure may have adverse
tax consequences.
If, by the end of the 60-day period following the date the first
notice is provided, the unresponsive participating employer neither
takes appropriate remedial action with respect to the participating
employer failure nor initiates a spinoff (as described in Part II.D of
this Explanation of Provisions, titled ``Actions by Unresponsive
Participating Employer''), then the section 413(e) plan administrator
must provide a second notice to the employer. The second notice must be
provided no later than 30 days after the expiration of the 60-day
period following the date the first notice is provided. The second
notice must include the information required to be included in the
first notice. The second notice must also state that, if, within 60
days following the date the second notice is provided, the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer failure nor initiates a spinoff,
then a final notice describing the participating employer failure and
the consequences of not correcting the failure will be provided to
participants who are employees of the employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Department of Labor.
The proposed regulations provide that if, by the end of the 60-day
period following the date the second notice is provided, the
unresponsive participating employer neither takes appropriate remedial
action with respect to the participating employer failure nor initiates
a spinoff, then the
[[Page 17230]]
section 413(e) plan administrator must provide a final notice to the
employer. The final notice must be provided no later than 30 days after
the expiration of the 60-day period following the date the second
notice is provided. Within this time period, the final notice must also
be provided to participants who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their beneficiaries) and to the Office of
Enforcement of the Employee Benefits Security Administration in the
Department of Labor (or its successor office).\12\ The final notice
must include the information required to be included in the first
notice and specify the final deadline for an unresponsive participating
employer to take action (which is 60 days after the final notice is
provided). The final notice must also state that the notice is being
provided to participants who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their beneficiaries) and to the Department
of Labor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The notice to the Department of Labor should be mailed to
the Employee Benefits Security Administration's Office of
Enforcement (or its successor office). The Office of Enforcement is
currently located at 200 Constitution Ave. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20210.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The section 413(c) proposed regulations also required plan
administrators to send up to three notices with respect to a
participating employer failure, but provided a 90-day period between
notices. The shorter 60-day period between notices in these proposed
regulations is provided in response to comments recommending that the
overall notice period be shortened.
D. Actions by Unresponsive Participating Employer
The proposed regulations provide that after the unresponsive
participating employer has received notice of the participating
employer failure, the employer has the opportunity to either take
appropriate remedial action or initiate a spinoff. The final deadline
for the unresponsive participating employer to take one of these
actions is 60 days after the final notice is provided. The consequences
of the employer's failure to meet this deadline are described in Part
II.F of this Explanation of Provisions, titled ``Required Actions
Following Employer's Failure to Meet Deadline.''
The proposed regulations provide that if a participating employer
failure is a failure to provide information, the unresponsive
participating employer takes appropriate remedial action with respect
to that failure if the employer (or any person that is treated as a
single employer with the employer under section 414(b), (c), (m), or
(o)) provides the data, documents, or other information requested by a
section 413(e) plan administrator (or arranges for that information to
be provided to the section 413(e) plan administrator). If a
participating employer failure is a failure to take action, the
unresponsive participating employer takes appropriate remedial action
with respect to the failure if the employer (or any person that is
treated as a single employer with the employer under section 414(b),
(c), (m), or (o)) takes all actions requested by the section 413(e)
plan administrator, such as making corrective contributions, needed for
the section 413(e) plan to satisfy the applicable requirements of
section 401(a) or 408.
As an alternative to taking appropriate remedial action with
respect to a failure to provide information or a failure to take
action, the proposed regulations provide that an unresponsive
participating employer may, after receiving notice of the participating
employer failure, initiate a spinoff. An unresponsive participating
employer initiates a spinoff by directing the section 413(e) plan
administrator to spin off amounts attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer to a separate single-employer plan
that is maintained by the employer in a manner consistent with the
terms of the section 413(e) plan. If the section 413(e) plan is
described in section 401(a), then the spun-off plan must also be a
section 401(a) plan. If the section 413(e) plan consists of individual
retirement accounts described in section 408 (including accounts
described in section 408(c), (k), or (p)), then the spun-off plan must
also consist of individual retirement accounts described in section
408. The section 413(e) plan administrator must implement the spinoff,
as described in Part II.E.2 of this Explanation of Provisions, titled
``Implementing a Spinoff.''
E. Actions by Section 413(e) Plan Administrator Relating to Remedial
Action or Employer-Initiated Spinoff
1. Failure To Provide Information That Becomes a Failure To Take Action
The proposed regulations describe when a failure to provide
information becomes a failure to take action. This situation could
occur if an unresponsive participating employer takes appropriate
remedial action with respect to a failure to provide information, and
the section 413(e) plan administrator determines that, based on the
information provided by the employer, there is a failure to satisfy a
requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as it relates to that employer's
participation in the section 413(e) plan. If the section 413(e) plan
administrator makes a reasonable request for the employer to take the
actions needed to satisfy the requirement, and the employer does not
comply in a timely manner with that request, then the failure to
provide information becomes a failure to take action.
If a failure to provide information becomes a failure to take
action, a section 413(e) plan will be eligible for the unified plan
exception with respect to the failure to take action by satisfying the
conditions set forth in the proposed regulations with respect to that
failure. In satisfying those conditions, notices provided during the
period that the failure was a failure to provide information are not
taken into account. For example, a final notice that the section 413(e)
plan administrator provided in connection with the failure to provide
information would not satisfy the final notice requirement with respect
to the failure to take action.
However, in response to comments on the section 413(c) proposed
regulations that there were too many notices required in cases in which
the failure to provide information became a failure to take action, the
proposed regulations permit the section 413(e) plan administrator to
reduce the number of notices that it sends to the employer in this
situation. Specifically, if the section 413(e) plan administrator had
provided the second notice with respect to a failure to provide
information before it became a failure to take action, then the section
413(e) plan administrator may satisfy the requirement to send a first
and second notice with respect to the failure to take action by sending
a combined first and second notice to the unresponsive participating
employer, provided that (1) the section 413(e) plan administrator's
request to take action (described in the first paragraph under this
Part II.E of this Explanation of Provisions) is made as soon as
reasonably practicable after the determination of the failure to
satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as it relates to that
employer's participation in the section 413(e) plan, and (2) the
section 413(e) plan administrator provides the combined first and
second notice with respect to the failure to take action not later than
24 months following the end of the plan year in which the failure to
satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 occurs. The combined
first and second notice must include information similar
[[Page 17231]]
to the information required for the first and second notices described
in Part II.C of this Explanation of Provisions, titled ``Notice
Requirements.'' For example, the combined first and second notice must
describe the participating employer failure, the actions the
unresponsive participating employer would need to take to remedy the
failure, and the consequences under the terms of the plan if the
employer neither takes appropriate remedial action with respect to the
failure nor initiates a spinoff of amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive participating employer. In addition, the
combined first and second notice must specify that, if, within 60 days
following the date the combined first and second notice is provided,
the unresponsive participating employer neither takes appropriate
remedial action with respect to the participating employer failure nor
initiates a spinoff, then the final notice described in Part II.C of
this Explanation of Provisions, titled ``Notice Requirements,'' will be
provided to participants who are employees of the employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Department of Labor.
2. Implementing a Spinoff
The proposed regulations provide that if, instead of taking
appropriate remedial action (as described in Part II.D of this
Explanation of Provisions, titled ``Actions by Unresponsive
Participating Employer''), an unresponsive participating employer
initiates a spinoff of amounts attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer to a separate single-employer plan
established and maintained by the employer, or to a separate plan
sponsored by the employer that consists of individual retirement
accounts, then the section 413(e) plan administrator must implement and
complete the spinoff as soon as reasonably practicable after the
employer initiates the spinoff. Under a safe harbor in the proposed
regulations in Sec. 1.413-3(d)(2), the section 413(e) plan
administrator is treated as satisfying this requirement if the spinoff
is completed within 180 days of the date on which the unresponsive
participating employer initiates the spinoff. Comments are requested on
whether there are any circumstances in which it would be appropriate
for any of the amounts attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer to remain in the MEP after the
employer has specifically directed that there be a spinoff, and, if so,
what those circumstances are, and for which employees this treatment
may be appropriate.
F. Required Actions Following Employer's Failure To Meet Deadline
The proposed regulations provide that if, by the final deadline (60
days after the final notice is provided), an unresponsive participating
employer neither takes appropriate remedial action nor initiates a
spinoff, then as soon as reasonably practicable after that deadline,
the section 413(e) plan administrator must: (1) Stop accepting
contributions from the unresponsive participating employer and its
employees; (2) provide notice to participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer (and their beneficiaries); and (3)
to the extent provided in the proposed regulations, provide
participants who are employees of the unresponsive participating
employer (and their beneficiaries) with an election regarding treatment
of their plan accounts. In addition, the section 413(e) plan
administrator must distribute benefits as soon as administratively
feasible following an individual's election or following the section
413(e) plan administrator's determination that it is not required to
provide an individual with an election.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Whether an action is taken as soon as administratively
feasible is determined under all the facts and circumstances. See
Rev. Rul. 89-87, 1989-2 CB 81 (Whether a distribution is made as
soon as administratively feasible after the date of plan termination
specified by an employer is to be determined under all the facts and
circumstances of a given case but, generally, a distribution that is
not completed within one year following the date of termination will
be presumed not to have been made as soon as administratively
feasible.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The notice to participants required by Sec. 1.413-3(e)(1)(ii)(B)
and (e)(2) of the proposed regulations must state that: (1) No further
contributions will be made to the section 413(e) plan on behalf of
participants who are employees of the unresponsive participating
employer; (2) participants who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer have a nonforfeitable right to amounts credited
to their accounts that are attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer; and (3) a participant who is an
employee of the unresponsive participating employer (or, if applicable,
any beneficiary of the participant) will receive additional information
regarding the disposition of the participant's or beneficiary's
account.
To satisfy the election requirement in Sec. 1.413-3(e)(1)(ii)(C)
of the proposed regulations, except as otherwise provided by the
proposed regulations, a section 413(e) plan administrator must provide
participants who are employees of the unresponsive participating
employer (and their beneficiaries) with an election to have amounts
attributable to the employees of the unresponsive participating
employer (1) directly rolled over to an eligible retirement plan within
the meaning of section 402(c)(8), or (2) remain in the section 413(e)
plan. With respect to this election, under a default rule in Sec.
1.413-3(e)(3)(ii) of the proposed regulations, an individual who fails
to make an affirmative election is treated as having elected to have
those amounts remain in the section 413(e) plan.
The option to remain in the plan is consistent with section
413(e)(2)(A), which requires the terms of the plan to provide, in part,
that the plan assets attributable to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer will be transferred to an eligible retirement
plan or to another arrangement that the Secretary determines is
appropriate, unless the Secretary determines that it is in their best
interests to retain the assets in the plan. The Treasury Department and
the IRS have determined that it is in the best interest of an
individual who elects to remain in the section 413(e) plan to have that
election followed. In addition, the default rule with respect to that
election, under which the account of an individual who does not make an
affirmative election will remain in the section 413(e) plan, is
consistent with the consent requirements of section 411(a)(11).
The proposed regulations provide that if an individual elects to
have amounts attributable to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer remain in the section 413(e) plan, those amounts
must remain in the section 413(e) plan until a distribution is made
under the terms of the plan without regard to section 413(e). Although
the terms of the section 413(e) plan continue to apply to a participant
remaining in the plan, the section 413(e) plan administrator may not
have contact with the participating employer after contributions have
ceased (and, therefore, may not be notified about the individual's
severance from employment with the employer). Accordingly, the proposed
regulations provide that, in determining whether a participant is
entitled to a distribution upon severance from employment, a section
413(e) plan administrator may rely on the participant's representation
that the participant has experienced a severance from employment,
unless the section 413(e) plan administrator has actual knowledge to
the contrary.
[[Page 17232]]
The option to remain in the plan is not available to an individual
if plan terms would have provided for a mandatory distribution of those
amounts had the participant experienced a severance from employment.
Instead, those amounts must be distributed from the section 413(e)
plan. In this situation, the proposed regulations provide rules for the
disposition of the mandatory distribution, based on the applicability
of section 401(a)(31) under the terms of the plan that would apply in
the case of a severance from employment. Comments are requested on
whether there should be special rules for mandatory distributions that
apply in this situation, including in cases involving missing
participants.
The proposed regulations provide that the portion of the mandatory
distribution that is an eligible rollover distribution subject to
section 401(a)(31)(B) must be directly rolled over to an eligible
retirement plan. In accordance with section 401(a)(31)(B), the section
413(e) plan administrator must provide the individual with an election
for the rollover to be made either to an eligible retirement plan
chosen by the individual or to an individual retirement plan of a
designated trustee or issuer. For example, a section 413(e) plan
administrator is not required to provide the option to remain in the
plan to an individual with an account balance of $3,000 if, consistent
with sections 401(a)(31)(B) and 411(a)(11), plan terms require
mandatory distributions with respect to a participant who experiences a
severance from employment with an account balance of up to $5,000 and
automatic rollover of distributions with respect to an participant who
experiences a severance from employment with an account balance that
exceeds $1,000.
For any portion of the mandatory distribution that is an eligible
rollover distribution subject to section 401(a)(31)(A) (but not section
401(a)(31)(B)), the section 413(e) plan administrator must provide the
individual with an election in accordance with section 401(a)(31)(A)
for that portion to be rolled over directly to an eligible retirement
plan chosen by the individual or, if no eligible retirement plan is
chosen, paid directly to the individual.
For the portion of a mandatory distribution that is not subject to
the requirement to offer a direct rollover option under section
401(a)(31), the section 413(e) plan administrator must pay the
individual. For example, a section 413(e) plan administrator is not
required to provide an election to an individual with an account
balance of less than $200 if, consistent with section 411(a)(11) and
Sec. 1.401(a)(31), Q&A-11, plan terms require that mandatory
distributions of less than $200 be paid directly to distributees.
Giving an individual an election to have amounts transferred to an
individual retirement plan generally does not mean that a distribution
may be paid directly to the individual. However, if, pursuant to the
proposed regulations, an individual makes an election to have an amount
directly rolled over to an eligible retirement plan, and a portion of
the amount is not an eligible rollover distribution described in
section 402(c)(4), then that portion must be paid directly to the
individual. For example, the portion of a distribution that would be a
required minimum distribution under section 401(a)(9) must be paid
directly to the individual rather than directly rolled over. In
addition, if an individual is otherwise entitled to a distribution from
the section 413(e) plan without regard to section 413(e), the
individual may elect to have amounts paid directly to the individual.
Any election that is provided to an individual pursuant to the
proposed regulations must include an effective opportunity for the
individual to make the election. Whether an individual has an effective
opportunity is determined based on all the relevant facts and
circumstances, including the adequacy of notice of the availability of
the election, the period of time during which the election may be made,
and any other conditions on the election.
G. Duties of a Pooled Plan Provider
The proposed regulations provide that, if a section 413(e) plan has
a pooled plan provider during the plan year of a participating employer
failure, the unified plan exception will not apply unless the pooled
plan provider performs substantially all of the administrative duties
that are required of the pooled plan provider for that year.
III. Other Rules
A. Form of Notices and Elections
Any notice required to be provided or election required to be made
under the proposed regulations must be in written or electronic form.
For notices and elections provided to or made by participants and
beneficiaries, see generally Sec. 1.401(a)-21 for rules permitting the
use of electronic media to provide applicable notices and make
participant elections with respect to retirement plans.
B. Status of Spun-Off Plan
In the case of any plan that is spun off in accordance with the
proposed regulations, any participating employer failure that would
have caused the section 413(e) plan to fail to meet the requirements of
section 401(a) or 408, as applicable, but for the application of the
unified plan exception, will result in the spun-off plan failing to
meet those requirements.
C. Responsible Parties
The proposed regulations provide that a participating employer
demonstrates a lack of commitment to compliance if the participating
employer fails to take appropriate remedial action or initiate a
spinoff by the final deadline (60 days after the final notice). The IRS
reserves the right to pursue appropriate remedies under the Code
against any party (such as the owner of the participating employer) who
is responsible for the failure to satisfy the requirements of section
401(a) or 408, as applicable, even in the party's capacity as a
participant or beneficiary (such as by not treating a section 413(e)
plan distribution made with respect to the owner of a participating
employer as an eligible rollover distribution).
IV. Updates to Section 413(c) Regulations
The proposed regulations update existing Sec. 1.413-2 to reflect
legislation enacted after the regulations were issued. The proposed
regulations update the rules for determining the number of employers
maintaining a plan for purposes of the requirement in Sec. 1.413-
2(a)(2)(i)(B) of the proposed regulations that a section 413(c) plan
must be maintained by more than one employer. For purposes of that
requirement, the proposed regulations include a rule that the number of
employers maintaining a plan is determined by treating any employers
described in section 414(m) (relating to affiliated service groups) as
if such employers are a single employer. The existing regulations in
Sec. 1.413-2(a)(2) were issued in 1979 and, therefore, did not address
section 414(m), which was added by section 201(a) of the Miscellaneous
Revenue Act of 1980, Public Law 96-605 (94 Stat. 3521). Section 414(m)
provides that all employers in an affiliated service group shall be
treated as a single employer for certain purposes.
The proposed regulations also modify the definition of a section
413(c) plan and the unified plan rule in the final section 413(c)
regulations to apply to a
[[Page 17233]]
plan that consists of individual retirement accounts under section 408,
remove a reference to section 405(a) from the final section 413(c)
regulations (because that section was repealed), and modify the final
section 413(c) regulations to add that the exclusive benefit provision
in section 413(c)(2) applies for purposes of section 408(c).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Section 414(l) does not apply to a plan that consists of
individual retirement accounts described in section 408. Therefore,
in Sec. 1.413-2(a)(2)(i)(A), the proposed regulations limit the
cross references to section 413(a) and Sec. 1.413-1(a)(2) to apply
only to qualified plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Withdrawal of Section 413(c) Proposed Regulations
Because section 101 of the SECURE Act amended the Code with respect
to the unified plan rule after the issuance of the section 413(c)
proposed regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS withdraw the
section 413(c) proposed regulations.
VI. Coordination With EPCRS
A. In General
Under EPCRS,\15\ a failure to follow plan terms is an operational
failure that adversely affects plan qualification. An operational
failure would include, for example, a section 413(e) plan
administrator's failure to provide the first notice by the applicable
deadline included in plan terms, discussed in Part II.B of this
Explanation of Provisions, titled ``Plan Language.'' EPCRS sets forth
three programs for correcting operational failures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) is
a comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of
certain retirement plans, including plans that are intended to
satisfy the requirements of sections 401(a), 408(k), and 408(p).
EPCRS provides procedures for an employer to correct a plan's
failure to satisfy an applicable qualification requirement so that
the failure does not result in disqualification of the plan. EPCRS
has been updated and expanded several times, most recently in Rev.
Proc. 2021-30, 2021-I.R.B. 324. The discussion in this Part VI of
this Explanation of Provisions is limited to the application of
EPCRS to qualified plans under section 401(a). See Rev. Proc. 2021-
30 for rules under sections 408(k) and 408(p).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Self-Correction Program (SCP), a plan sponsor that
follows established compliance practices and procedures may correct
operational failures without paying a fee or sanction. A plan sponsor
of a qualified plan (for example, a plan that is intended to satisfy
section 401(a)) may correct significant operational failures under SCP
if the plan has a favorable determination letter or a favorable opinion
or advisory letter.\16\ In general, correction of a significant
operational failure through SCP must be completed by the last day of
the correction period, which generally ends on the last day of the
third plan year following the plan year for which the failure
occurred.\17\ However, the correction period for a significant
operational failure that occurs for any plan year ends on the first
date the plan or plan sponsor is under examination \18\ for that plan
year.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See section 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 2021-30.
\17\ Section 9 of Rev. Proc. 2021-30 addresses the period for
correcting significant operational failures under SCP, including
some exceptions to this general rule.
\18\ Under examination is defined in section 5.08 of Rev. Proc.
2021-30.
\19\ If correction has been substantially completed (as
described in section 9.03 of Rev. Proc. 2021-30) before the end of
the correction period, correction is permitted to be completed after
the end of the correction period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Voluntary Correction Program (VCP), a plan sponsor, at
any time before audit, may file a VCP submission, pay an applicable
user fee, implement corrective actions, and satisfy any other
conditions in an IRS compliance statement for correction of an
operational failure in a qualified plan, SEP, or SIMPLE IRA Plan. In
general, if the plan or plan sponsor is under examination, VCP is not
available.
Under the Audit Closing Agreement Program (Audit CAP), if an
operational failure (other than a failure corrected through SCP or VCP)
is identified on audit, the plan sponsor may correct the failure and
pay a sanction. The sanction imposed will bear a reasonable
relationship to the nature, extent, and severity of the failure, and
will be based on a number of factors,\20\ including the maximum payment
amount (which is approximately equal to the tax the IRS could collect
upon plan disqualification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See section 14 of Rev. Proc. 2021-30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Using EPCRS To Correct an Operational Failure to Timely Provide the
First Notice
A section 413(e) plan administrator's failure to provide the first
notice with respect to a participating employer failure by the
applicable deadline included in plan terms would not affect the section
413(e) plan's eligibility for the unified plan exception. However, the
failure to follow plan terms would result in an operational failure
treated as a significant operational failure under EPCRS that is
independent of any underlying participating employer failure.
Whether SCP, VCP, or Audit CAP is available to correct an
operational failure to provide the first notice by the applicable
deadline will be determined under the rules of EPCRS. Because the
failure is a significant operational failure, the failure may be
corrected under SCP only if correction is completed (or substantially
completed) by the end of the correction period, and the correction
period generally ends on the last day of the third plan year following
the plan year containing the deadline for sending the first notice. For
example, if the deadline for sending the first notice is December 31,
2024, a failure to provide notice by that deadline generally may be
corrected through SCP until December 31, 2027 (assuming the plan year
is the calendar year). If, however, the plan or plan sponsor comes
under examination for 2024 beginning on July 1, 2026, the correction
period for SCP ends on July 1, 2026, and SCP is no longer available
(unless the correction had been substantially completed by that date).
A failure to provide the first notice by the deadline included in
the terms of the plan may also be corrected under VCP. If, for example,
the deadline for sending the first notice is December 31, 2024, and the
correction period under SCP ends on December 31, 2027, then a VCP
application may be submitted with respect to the failure in 2028 or in
a later year, provided that neither the plan nor the plan sponsor is
under examination for the plan year ending December 31, 2024. If SCP
and VCP are not available with respect to a failure, the failure may be
corrected under Audit CAP.
C. Resolution of Participating Employer Failure
If the unresponsive participating employer provides the information
requested by the section 413(e) plan administrator in connection with a
failure to provide information, there is no longer a failure to provide
information. If the unresponsive participating employer takes the
action requested by the plan administrator in connection with a failure
to take action (and the plan satisfies the requirements of SCP, VCP, or
Audit CAP, as applicable, with respect to the underlying failure),
there is no longer a failure to take action. In either case, if a
participating employer failure no longer exists, an operational failure
to provide the first notice by the deadline included in plan terms with
respect to that participating employer failure is treated as corrected.
Proposed Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to apply beginning on the date of
publication of the Treasury decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register. Pursuant to section 413(e)(4)(B),
until the final
[[Page 17234]]
regulations are published, an employer or pooled plan provider may rely
on a good faith, reasonable interpretation of the provisions of section
413(e) to which the final regulations relate. Compliance with these
proposed regulations is considered reliance on a good faith, reasonable
interpretation of the provisions of section 413(e) to which the final
regulations relate.
Availability of IRS Documents
For copies of recently issued revenue procedures, revenue rulings,
notices and other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin,
please visit the IRS website at www.irs.gov or contact the
Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Impact Analysis
These regulations are not subject to review under section 6(b) of
Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (April
11, 2018) between the Treasury Department and the Office of Management
and Budget regarding review of tax regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The following provisions of the proposed regulations contain a
collection of information: (1) Sec. 1.413-3(a)(2)(i) (requirement to
adopt plan language); (2) Sec. 1.413-3(a)(2)(ii)(A), (b), and
(d)(1)(ii) (requirement to provide notice with respect to a
participating employer failure); (3) Sec. 1.413-3(a)(3) (requirements
to be a pooled plan provider); (4) Sec. 1.413-3(e)(1)(ii)(B) and
(e)(2) (requirement to provide notice to certain participants and
beneficiaries; and (5) Sec. 1.413-3(e)(1)(ii)(C), (e)(3), and (e)(4)
(requirement to provide an election to certain participants and
beneficiaries). The collection of information contained in proposed
Sec. 1.413-3 will generally be carried out by section 413(e) plan
administrators seeking to satisfy the conditions for the exception to
the unified plan rule. The collection of information in this notice of
proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget for review in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)).
1. Plan Language Requirement, Sec. 1.413-3(a)(2)(i)
Section 1.413-3(a)(2)(i) states that, as one of the conditions of
the exception to the unified plan rule, a section 413(e) plan must
include plan language that sets forth the procedures that will be
followed to address participating employer failures. Thus, a section
413(e) plan will not be eligible for the exception to the unified plan
rule if it does not satisfy this plan-language requirement. In general,
the plan language requirement is a one-time paperwork burden for each
section 413(e) plan. In addition, after final regulations are issued,
the IRS intends to publish model plan language, which will help to
minimize the burden.
We estimate that the burden for this requirement under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 will be 3 hours per section 413(e)
plan. Given the potential benefits of satisfying the conditions for the
unified plan exception, we assume that approximately 95 percent of
section 413(e) plans (4,275 section 413(e) plans \21\) will be amended
to satisfy this condition. Therefore, the total burden of this
requirement is estimated to be 12,825 hours (4,275 section 413(e) plans
times 3 hours). However, because a section 413(e) plan that adopts an
amendment will generally do so on a one-time basis, to determine an
annual estimate, the total time is divided by three, or 4,275 hours
annually (section 413(e) plans times 1 hour).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ This calculation uses data from the 2018 Form 5500,
``Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan.'' These filings
indicate that there are approximately 4,523 defined contribution
MEPs. See 2018 Form 5500 Annual Reports Abstract (dol.gov). We
estimate that 4,500 defined contribution MEPs will satisfy the
requirements to be a section 413(e) plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Notice Requirements, Sec. 1.413-3(a)(2)(ii)(A), (b), and (d)(1)(ii)
Section 1.413-3(a)(ii)(A) of the proposed regulations provide that
notice is another condition of the exception to the unified plan rule.
In most cases, Sec. 1.413-3(b) of the proposed regulations would
require a section 413(e) plan administrator to send up to three notices
informing an unresponsive participating employer of a participating
employer failure and the consequences if the employer fails to take
remedial action or initiate a spinoff from the section 413(e) plan.
After each notice is provided, the employer has 60 days to take
appropriate remedial action or initiate a spinoff from the section
413(e) plan. If the employer takes those actions after the first or
second notice is provided, subsequent notices are not required. Thus,
it is possible that a section 413(e) plan administrator will send fewer
than three notices to an employer. However, because the notice
requirements only apply if an employer has already been unresponsive to
the section 413(e) plan administrator's requests, we assume that in
most cases, all three notices will be provided.
Section 1.413-3(d)(1)(ii) of the proposed regulations provide that
if a failure to provide information becomes a failure to take action,
the section 413(e) plan administrator may be required to send up to two
(rather than three) notices with respect to the failure to take action
by combining the first and second notices. This rule applies if the
section 413(e) plan administrator had provided the second notice with
respect to the failure to provide information and certain other
conditions are satisfied.
We estimate that the burden of preparing the notices will be an
average of 3 hours per unresponsive participating employer. We estimate
that approximately 450 section 413(e) plans (10 percent of the 4,500
total estimated section 413(e) plans described in footnote 20) will
provide notice with respect to one unresponsive participating employer
per year. We estimate that approximately 10 percent of section 413(e)
plans (10 percent of 4,500 section 413(e) plans is 450 section 413(e)
plans) will provide notice with respect to one unresponsive
participating employer per year. Therefore, we estimate a burden of
1,350 hours (450 section 413(e) plans times 3 hours). As with all
estimates in this collection of information, we expect to be able to
adjust these estimates based on experience after the regulations are
finalized.
The notices must be sent to the unresponsive participating employer
and the final notice will also be sent to plan participants who are
employees of the unresponsive participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Department of Labor. We estimate that, on
average, a section 413(e) plan administrator will send the final notice
to approximately 50 plan participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer (and their beneficiaries). Based on
the estimate in the previous paragraph that 450 section 413(e) plans
will provide notice with respect to one unresponsive participating
employer per year, we estimate the burden of distributing these notices
to be an average of 2 hours per section 413(e) plan, for a total burden
of 900 hours (450 section 413(e) plans times 2 hours).
3. Requirements for Pooled Plan Providers, Sec. 1.413-3(a)(3)
Under the proposed regulations, the term pooled plan provider
means, with respect to any plan, a person who satisfies the following
requirements: (1) Registers as a pooled plan provider with the
Commissioner (Sec. 1.413-
[[Page 17235]]
3(a)(3)(i)(A)); (2) is designated by the terms of the plan as a named
fiduciary (within the meaning of section 402(a)(2) of ERISA), as the
plan administrator, and as the person required to perform certain
administrative duties (Sec. 1.413-3(a)(3)(i)(B)); (3) acknowledges in
writing that, with respect to the plan, it is a named fiduciary and the
plan administrator (Sec. 1.413-3(a)(3)(i)(C)); and (4) is responsible
for ensuring that all persons who handle assets of, or who are
fiduciaries of, the plan are bonded in accordance with section 412 of
ERISA (Sec. 1.413-3(a)(3)(i)(D)).
Pursuant to proposed Sec. 1.413-3(a)(3)(i)(A), the requirement to
register as a pooled plan provider under section 413(e) is fulfilled by
satisfying the parallel requirement under ERISA to register as a pooled
plan provider with the Department of Labor. On November 16, 2020, the
Department of Labor issued final regulations under section 3(44) of
ERISA (29 CFR 2510.3-44) with respect to the registration requirement.
See 85 FR 72934. The OMB Control Number associated with the requirement
in those regulations is 1210-0164.
With respect to Sec. 1.413-3(a)(3)(i)(B) and (C), the Department
of Labor estimates that roughly 3,200 pooled plan providers will file
an original registration, and that there will be 3,460 supplemental
filings in the first year. See 85 FR 72952. A supplemental filing may
amend the original registration to include information for pooled
employer plans that either begin or cease operations, or it can be used
to make certain other changes to the initial filing. Based on this
data, we estimate that in the first year a large number of the
estimated supplemental filings, or 3,000, will be used to report the
beginning of pooled employer plan operations. In subsequent years, we
estimate that approximately 450 plans with pooled plan providers will
commence operations.\22\ We estimate the combined burden of Sec.
1.413-3(a)(3)(i)(B) and (C) to be an average of 15 minutes per section
413(e) plan, for a total initial burden of 750 hours (3,000 section
413(e) plans times 15 minutes) and a total annual burden of 112.5 hours
(450 section 413(e) plans times 15 minutes).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ This estimate was informed by the Department of Labor's
estimate of the number of pooled employer plans expected to commence
operations. See 85 FR 72952-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Notice to Participants, Sec. 1.413-3(e)(1)(ii)(B) and (e)(2)
If an unresponsive participating employer neither takes appropriate
remedial action nor initiates a spinoff by the deadline in the proposed
regulations, then the section 413(e) plan administrator must provide
notice to participants who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their beneficiaries) stating the following:
(1) No further contributions will be made to the section 413(e) plan on
their behalf; (2) they have a nonforfeitable right to amounts credited
to their accounts that are attributable to employment with the
unresponsive participating employer; and (3) they will receive
additional information regarding the disposition of their accounts. We
estimate that in a given year, 5 percent of all section 413(e) plans
(225 section 413(e) plans) will provide this notice, and that each
notice will be sent to approximately 50 individuals. We also estimate
that the burden for this requirement is 1 hour. Based on this number,
we estimate that the burden of preparing and distributing the notices
will be 225 hours (225 section 413(e) plans times 1 hour).
5. Election, Sec. 1.413-3(e)(1)(ii)(C), (e)(3) and (4)
If an unresponsive participating employer neither takes appropriate
remedial action nor initiates a spinoff by the deadline in the proposed
regulations, then the section 413(e) plan administrator generally must
provide participants who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their beneficiaries) with an election to
have amounts attributable to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer directly rolled over to an eligible retirement
plan within the meaning of section 402(c)(8) or remain in the section
413(e) plan. A participant whose account is subject to the mandatory
distribution rules will have an alternative election. We estimate that
in a given year, 5 percent of all section 413(e) plans (225 section
413(e) plans) will provide an election, and that each election will be
sent to approximately 50 individuals. We also estimate that the burden
for this requirement is 3 hours. Based on this number, we estimate that
the burden for this requirement will be 675 hours (225 section 413(e)
plans times 3 hours).
Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the
Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department
of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20503, with copies to the Internal Revenue Service,
Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP; Washington, DC
20224. Comments on the collection of information should be received by
May 27, 2022. Comments are specifically requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the IRS, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
The accuracy of the estimated burden associated with the proposed
collection of information;
How the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected may be enhanced;
How the burden of complying with the proposed collections of
information may be minimized, including through the application of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology; and
Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of service to provide information.
Estimated total average annual recordkeeping burden: 7,750 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per response: 1 hour, 43 minutes.
Estimated number of recordkeepers: 4,500.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid
control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget.
Books or records relating to a collection of information must be
retained as long as their contents may become material in the
administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and
tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
It is hereby certified that these proposed regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
6). This certification is based on the fact that the proposed
regulations reflect the statutory changes to section 413 made by
section 101 of the SECURE Act. More specifically, these regulations
merely conform existing regulations under section 413(c) and implement
new regulations under section 413(e) in a manner that is consistent
with the new statutory language.
Although these proposed regulations might affect a substantial
number of small entities, the economic impact of these proposed
regulations is not expected to be significant. These regulations are
not expected to result in economically meaningful changes in
[[Page 17236]]
behavior for MEPs and participating employers. While MEPs may be an
efficient way to reduce costs and complexity associated with
establishing and maintaining defined contribution plans, some employers
may be reluctant to join a MEP because of the potential adverse impact
of the unified plan rule. These proposed regulations will implement a
statutory exception to the unified plan rule, thus eliminating a
potential barrier to an employer joining a MEP.
It is unlikely that the exception to the unified plan rule will be
used often in a section 413(e) MEP. In general, it is expected that
participating employers in defined contribution MEPs will comply with
applicable requirements for a defined contribution plan. Accordingly,
the use of the exception to the unified plan rule by a section 413(e)
plan is expected to be rare.
For the reasons stated, a regulatory flexibility analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act is not required. The Treasury Department and
the IRS invite comments on the impact of these regulations on small
entities. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of
proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel of Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed amendments to the regulations are adopted as
final regulations, consideration will be given to comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS as prescribed in the preamble under the
ADDRESSES section. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments
on all aspects of the proposed regulations. Comments are specifically
requested on what (if any) guidance would be helpful regarding whether
employers have a common interest other than having adopted a plan, as
described in Part I.A of the Explanation of Provisions, titled
``Overview.'' Comments are also specifically requested on the rules for
mandatory distributions for employees of an unresponsive participating
employer, as described in Part II.F of the Explanation of Provisions,
titled ``Required Actions Following Employer's Failure to Meet
Deadline.''
Any electronic comments submitted, and to the extent practicable
any paper comments submitted, will be made available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A telephonic public hearing has been scheduled for June 22, 2022,
beginning at 10 a.m. EST. The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to
the hearing. Persons who wish to present oral comments by telephone at
the hearing must submit electronic or written comments and an outline
of the topics to be addressed and the time to be devoted to each topic
by May 27, 2022 as prescribed in the preamble under the ADDRESSES
section.
A period of 10 minutes will be allocated to each person for making
comments. After the deadline for receiving outlines has passed, the IRS
will prepare an agenda containing the schedule of speakers. Copies of
the agenda will be made available at www.regulations.gov, search IRS
and REG-121508-18. Copies of the agenda will also be available by
emailing a request to [email protected]. Please put ``REG-121508-
18 Agenda Request'' in the subject line of the email.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Jamie Dvoretzky and
Pamela Kinard, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits,
Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes (EEE)). However, other
personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated in the
development of these regulations.
Withdrawal of Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of proposed
rulemaking that was published in the Federal Register on Wednesday,
July 3, 2019 (84 FR 31777) is withdrawn.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Amend Sec. 1.413-2 by revising paragraph (a)(2), (a)(3)(iv),
(a)(4), and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.413-2 Special rules for plans maintained by more than one
employer.
(a) * * *
(2) Section 413(c) plan--(i) Definition of section 413(c) plan. A
plan (and each trust which is part of such plan) is a section 413(c)
plan if--
(A) The plan is a single plan (which for a qualified plan is a
single plan within the meaning of section 413(a) and Sec. 1.413-
1(a)(2)); and
(B) The plan is maintained by more than one employer.
(ii) Determining the number of employers maintaining the plan. For
purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B) of this section, the number of
employers maintaining a plan is determined by treating any employers
described in section 414(b) (relating to a controlled group of
corporations), any employers described in section 414(c) (relating to
trades or businesses under common control), or any employers described
in section 414(m) (relating to affiliated service groups), whichever is
applicable, as if such employers are a single employer.
(iii) Master or prototype plans and common trust funds. A master or
prototype plan is not a section 413(c) plan unless such a plan is
described in this paragraph (a)(2). Similarly, the mere fact that a
plan, or plans, utilize a common trust fund or otherwise pool plan
assets for investment purposes does not, by itself, result in a
particular plan being treated as a section 413(c) plan.
(3) * * *
(iv) Whether a section 413(c) plan complies with the requirements
of section 401(a), 403(a), or 408 is determined with respect to all
participating employers. Consequently, the failure by one participating
employer (or by the plan itself) to satisfy an applicable requirement
of those sections will result in the section 413(c) plan failing to
satisfy that requirement with respect to all employers maintaining the
section 413(c) plan. However, the rules in this paragraph (a)(3)(iv) do
not apply to the extent provided in section 413(e) and Sec. 1.413-3.
(4) Applicability dates--(i) General applicability date. Except as
otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section, section
413(c) and this section apply to a plan for plan years beginning after
December 31, 1953.
(ii) Special applicability date. Paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3)(iv), and
(c) of this section apply beginning on the date of publication of the
Treasury decision adopting these rules as final regulations in the
Federal Register. For earlier periods, the rules of paragraphs (a)(2),
(a)(3)(iv), and (c) of 26 CFR 1.413-2 (revised as of April 1, 2021)
apply.
* * * * *
(c) Exclusive benefit. In the case of a plan subject to this
section, in determining whether the plan of an employer is for the
exclusive benefit of its employees (and their beneficiaries)
[[Page 17237]]
for purposes of sections 401(a) and 408(c), all of the employees
participating in the plan shall be treated as employees of the
employer.
* * * * *
0
Par. 3. Section 1.413-3 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.413-3 Special Rules for Section 413(e) Plans
(a) Exception to unified plan rule for section 413(e) plans--(1) In
general. Notwithstanding Sec. 1.413-2(a)(3)(iv), a section 413(e) plan
will not be treated as failing to meet the requirements under the Code
applicable to a plan described in section 401(a) or to a plan that
consists of individual retirement accounts described in section 408
(including accounts described in section 408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)),
whichever is applicable, merely because of a participating employer
failure, provided that the conditions in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section are satisfied.
(2) Conditions for exception to general rule. The conditions for
the exception to the unified plan rule in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section are set forth in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(i) Plan language. The terms of the section 413(e) plan must set
forth the procedures that will be followed to address a participating
employer failure, including:
(A) A description of the notices that the section 413(e) plan
administrator will send in the case of a participating employer
failure, pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section;
(B) A statement that the section 413(e) plan administrator will
send the first notice described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section
(or, if applicable, the combined first and second notice described in
paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section) by a specified deadline (which,
for a failure to provide information, is 12 months following the end of
the plan year for which the information is necessary to determine
whether the section 413(e) plan is in compliance with a requirement of
section 401(a) or 408 and which, for a failure to take action, is 24
months following the end of the plan year in which the failure to
satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or 408) occurs;
(C) A description of the actions that the section 413(e) plan
administrator will take if, by the final deadline described in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, an unresponsive participating
employer does not either take appropriate remedial action pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2) of this section or initiate a spinoff pursuant to
paragraph (c)(3) of this section; and
(D) A statement that if an unresponsive participating employer does
not either take appropriate remedial action or initiate a spinoff by
the final deadline described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
participants who are employees of the unresponsive participating
employer have a nonforfeitable right to the amounts credited to their
accounts that are attributable to employment with the unresponsive
participating employer, determined in the same manner as if the plan
had terminated pursuant to section 411(d)(3).
(ii) Section 413(e) plan administrator obligations. A section
413(e) plan administrator must--
(A) Satisfy the notice requirements described in paragraph (b) of
this section with respect to the participating employer failure (taking
into account the rules for a combined first and second notice described
in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section);
(B) Implement a spinoff in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this
section if an unresponsive participating employer initiates a spinoff
pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section; and
(C) Take the actions required in paragraph (e) of this section if
an unresponsive participating employer fails either to take appropriate
remedial action with respect to the participating employer failure (as
described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section) or initiate a spinoff
(as described in paragraph (c)(3) of this section) by the final
deadline described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(iii) Pooled plan providers. If the section 413(e) plan has a
pooled plan provider during the plan year of the participating employer
failure, the pooled plan provider must perform substantially all of the
administrative duties that are required of the pooled plan provider
pursuant to paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section for the plan year.
(3) Section 413(e) plans administered by pooled plan providers--(i)
Requirements to be a pooled plan provider. With respect to a section
413(e) plan, for purposes of this section, a pooled plan provider is a
person who--
(A) Registers as a pooled plan provider with the Commissioner by
satisfying the registration requirements in section 3(44)(A)(ii) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Public Law 93-406 (88
Stat. 829), as amended (ERISA), in accordance with guidance issued by
the Department of Labor,
(B) Is designated by the terms of the plan as a named fiduciary
(within the meaning of section 402(a)(2) of ERISA), as the plan
administrator, and as the person required to perform the administrative
duties described in paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section,
(C) Acknowledges in writing that, with respect to the plan, it is a
named fiduciary and the plan administrator, and
(D) Is responsible for ensuring that all persons who handle assets
of, or who are fiduciaries of, the plan are bonded in accordance with
section 412 of ERISA.
(ii) Administrative duties required of pooled plan provider--(A) In
general. A pooled plan provider is required to perform all
administrative duties that are reasonably necessary to ensure that the
plan meets any applicable requirement under ERISA or the Code for a
plan described in section 401(a) or for a plan that consists of
individual retirement accounts described in section 408 (including
accounts described in section 408(c), 408(k), or 408(p)), whichever is
applicable, and each participating employer takes actions, including
providing any disclosures or other information, that are necessary for
the plan to meet the requirements described in this paragraph
(a)(3)(ii)(A).
(B) Administrative duties. The administrative duties of a pooled
plan provider include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Monitoring compliance with the terms of the plan, and Code and
ERISA requirements;
(2) Maintaining accurate plan data, including up-to-date
participant and beneficiary information;
(3) Performing and conducting coverage, top-heavy, and
discrimination testing under sections 401(a)(4), (k), and (m), 408(k),
410, and 416, if applicable;
(4) Processing all employee transactions (such as investment
changes, loans, and distributions);
(5) Satisfying Code and ERISA reporting and notice requirements
(such as reporting requirements under sections 6047 and 6058 and notice
requirements under sections 401(k)(12)(D) and (13)(E) and 402(f)); and
(6) Updating the plan to reflect statutory changes to the Code and
ERISA, to the extent the responsibility for updating the plan document
has been delegated to the section 413(e) plan administrator.
(iii) Aggregation rules. In determining whether a person meets the
requirements to be a pooled plan provider with respect to any section
413(e) plan, all persons who perform services for the plan and who are
treated as a single employer under section
[[Page 17238]]
414(b), (c), (m), or (o) are treated as one person.
(4) Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of
this section:
(i) Amounts attributable to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer. Amounts attributable to the employees of the
unresponsive participating employer are plan assets and account
balances held by a section 413(e) plan on behalf of employees of an
unresponsive participating employer that are attributable to their
employment with the unresponsive participating employer. If there is no
separate accounting for amounts that are attributable to employment
with the unresponsive participating employer and with other
participating employers, and a participant's account balance includes
amounts that are attributable to current employment with the
unresponsive participating employer and to previous employment with one
or more other participating employers, the entire account balance is
treated as attributable to employment with the unresponsive
participating employer. On the other hand, if a participant's account
balance includes amounts that are attributable to current employment
with a participating employer that is not the unresponsive
participating employer and to previous employment with the unresponsive
participating employer, none of the account balance is treated as
attributable to employment with the unresponsive participating
employer. For purposes of this paragraph (a)(4)(i), a participant's
most recent employment with a participating employer in the section
413(e) plan will be treated as the participant's current employment.
(ii) Beneficiary. A beneficiary is a beneficiary of a deceased
employee or an alternate payee (as defined in section 414(p)) with
respect to an employee.
(iii) Employee. An employee is a current or former employee of a
participating employer.
(iv) Failure to provide information. A failure to provide
information is a failure of a participating employer (or any person
that is treated as a single employer with that employer under section
414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) to respond in a timely manner to a reasonable
request by the section 413(e) plan administrator for data, documents,
or any other information that the plan administrator reasonably
believes is necessary to determine whether a section 413(e) plan is in
compliance with a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as it relates to
the participating employer.
(v) Failure to take action. A failure to take action is a failure
of a participating employer (or any person that is treated as a single
employer with that employer under section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) to
comply in a timely manner with a reasonable request by a section 413(e)
plan administrator to take action needed for the section 413(e) plan to
satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as it relates to the
participating employer.
(vi) Participating employer. A participating employer is one of the
employers maintaining a section 413(e) plan.
(vii) Participating employer failure. A participating employer
failure in a section 413(e) plan is a failure to provide information
(as defined in paragraph (a)(4)(iv) of this section) or a failure to
take action (as defined in paragraph (a)(4)(v) of this section).
(viii) Section 413(e) plan. A section 413(e) plan is a defined
contribution plan described in section 401(a) or a plan that consists
of individual retirement accounts described in section 408 (including
accounts described in section 408(c), (k), or (p)) that--
(A) Is a section 413(c) plan (as defined in Sec. 1.413-2(a)(2)),
and
(B) Is maintained by employers that all have a common interest
other than having adopted the plan or has a pooled plan provider as
described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(ix) Section 413(e) plan administrator. A section 413(e) plan
administrator is the plan administrator, within the meaning of section
414(g), of a section 413(e) plan.
(x) Unresponsive participating employer. An unresponsive
participating employer is a participating employer that has a
participating employer failure.
(b) Notice. The section 413(e) plan administrator satisfies the
notice requirements with respect to a participating employer failure if
it satisfies the requirements of this paragraph (b).
(1) First notice. The section 413(e) plan administrator must
provide notice to the unresponsive participating employer describing
the participating employer failure, the actions the employer must take
to remedy the failure, and the employer's option to initiate a spinoff
of amounts attributable to the employees of the unresponsive
participating employer to a separate single-employer plan that is
maintained by the employer. In addition, the notice must explain the
consequences under the terms of the plan if the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer failure nor initiates a spinoff,
including that participants who are employees of the employer will not
have any further contributions made to the plan on their behalf and
that individuals who are responsible for the failure may have adverse
tax consequences.
(2) Second notice. If, by the end of the 60-day period following
the date the first notice described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section
is provided, the unresponsive participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with respect to the participating employer
failure nor initiates a spinoff, then the section 413(e) plan
administrator must provide a second notice to the employer. The second
notice must be provided no later than 30 days after the expiration of
the 60-day period described in the preceding sentence. The second
notice must include the information required to be included in the
first notice. The second notice must also state that if, within 60 days
following the date the second notice is provided, the unresponsive
participating employer neither takes appropriate remedial action with
respect to the participating employer failure nor initiates a spinoff,
then a final notice describing the participating employer failure and
the consequences of not correcting the failure will be provided to
participants who are employees of the employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Department of Labor.
(3) Final notice. If, by the end of the 60-day period following the
date the second notice described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section is
provided, the unresponsive participating employer neither takes
appropriate remedial action with respect to the participating employer
failure nor initiates a spinoff, then the section 413(e) plan
administrator must provide a final notice to the employer. The final
notice must be provided no later than 30 days after the expiration of
the 60-day period described in the preceding sentence. Within this time
period, the final notice must also be provided to participants who are
employees of the unresponsive participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) and to the Office of Enforcement of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration in the Department of Labor (or its
successor office). The final notice must include the information
required to be included in the first notice and specify the final
deadline for an unresponsive participating employer to take action set
forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The final notice must also
state that the notice is being provided to participants who are
employees of the unresponsive
[[Page 17239]]
participating employer (and their beneficiaries) and to the Department
of Labor.
(c) Actions by unresponsive participating employer--(1) In general.
An unresponsive participating employer takes appropriate remedial
action with respect to a participating employer failure if it satisfies
the requirements of paragraph (c)(2) of this section. Alternatively, an
unresponsive participating employer initiates a spinoff for purposes of
paragraph (a)(2) of this section if the employer satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (c)(3) of this section. The final deadline
for an unresponsive participating employer to take one of these actions
is 60 days after the final notice described in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section is provided to the employer.
(2) Appropriate remedial action--(i) Appropriate remedial action
with respect to a failure to provide information. If a participating
employer failure is a failure to provide information, the unresponsive
participating employer takes appropriate remedial action with respect
to that failure if the employer provides the data, documents, or other
information requested by a section 413(e) plan administrator (or
arranges for that information to be provided to the section 413(e) plan
administrator).
(ii) Appropriate remedial action with respect to a failure to take
action. If a participating employer failure is a failure to take
action, the unresponsive participating employer takes appropriate
remedial action with respect to the failure if the employer (or any
person that is treated as a single employer with the employer under
section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)), takes all actions requested by the
section 413(e) plan administrator, such as making corrective
contributions, needed for the section 413(e) plan to satisfy the
applicable requirements of section 401(a) or 408.
(3) Employer-initiated spinoff. After receiving a notice described
in paragraph (b) of this section, an unresponsive participating
employer initiates a spinoff pursuant to this paragraph (c)(3) by
directing the section 413(e) plan administrator to spin off amounts
attributable to the employees of the unresponsive participating
employer to a separate single-employer plan that is maintained by the
employer in a manner consistent with the terms of the section 413(e)
plan. If the section 413(e) plan is described in section 401(a), then
the spun-off plan must also be a section 401(a) plan. If the section
413(e) plan consists of individual retirement accounts described in
section 408 (including accounts described in section 408(c), 408(k), or
408(p)), then the spun-off plan must also consist of individual
retirement accounts described in section 408.
(d) Section 413(e) plan administrator's response to employer's
remedial action--(1) Rules for a failure to provide information that
becomes a failure to take action--(i) In general. This paragraph (d)(1)
provides rules that apply if a failure to provide information becomes a
failure to take action. This situation could occur if the unresponsive
participating employer takes appropriate remedial action by providing
the information described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section and,
based on this information, the section 413(e) plan administrator
determines that there is a failure to satisfy a requirement of section
401(a) or 408 as it relates to that employer's participation in the
section 413(e) plan. If the section 413(e) plan administrator makes a
reasonable request for the employer to take the actions needed to
satisfy the requirement, and the employer does not comply in a timely
manner with that request, then, in accordance with paragraph (a)(4)(v)
of this section, the failure to provide information becomes a failure
to take action. In that case, the section 413(e) plan will be eligible
for the exception in paragraph (a)(1) of this section with respect to
the failure to take action by satisfying the conditions set forth in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section with respect to that failure, taking
into account the rules of this paragraph (d)(1).
(ii) Ability to combine first and second notices in certain
circumstances. For purposes of applying paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(A) of this
section in the case of a failure to provide information that becomes a
failure to take action, notices provided during the period that the
failure was a failure to provide information are not taken into
account. For example, a final notice that the section 413(e) plan
administrator provided in connection with the failure to provide
information would not satisfy the final notice requirement with respect
to the failure to take action. However, if the section 413(e) plan
administrator had provided the second notice described in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section with respect to a failure to provide information
before it became a failure to take action, then the section 413(e) plan
administrator may satisfy the requirement to send a first and second
notice with respect to the failure to take action by sending a combined
first and second notice that includes the information described in
paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this section to the unresponsive participating
employer, provided that--
(A) The section 413(e) plan administrator's request to take action
described in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section is made as soon as
reasonably practicable after the determination of the failure to
satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 as it relates to that
employer's participation in the section 413(e) plan; and
(B) The section 413(e) plan administrator provides the combined
first and second notice with respect to the failure to take action not
later than 24 months following the end of the plan year in which the
failure to satisfy a requirement of section 401(a) or 408 occurs.
(iii) Contents of combined first and second notice. To satisfy the
requirements of a combined first and second notice described in
paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, the notice must--
(A) Describe the participating employer failure, the actions the
unresponsive participating employer would need to take to remedy the
failure, and the employer's option to initiate a spinoff of amounts
attributable to the employees of the unresponsive participating
employer to a separate single-employer plan that is maintained by the
employer,
(B) Explain the consequences under the terms of the plan if the
unresponsive participating employer neither takes appropriate remedial
action with respect to the participating employer failure nor initiates
a spinoff, including that participants who are employees of the
employer will not have any further contributions made to the plan on
their behalf and that individuals who are responsible for the failure
may have adverse tax consequences, and
(C) Specify that if, within 60 days following the date the combined
first and second notice is provided, the unresponsive participating
employer neither takes appropriate remedial action with respect to the
participating employer failure nor initiates a spinoff, then a notice
describing the participating employer failure and the consequences of
not correcting the failure will be provided to participants who are
employees of the employer (and their beneficiaries) and to the
Department of Labor.
(2) Implementing employer-initiated spinoff. If an unresponsive
participating employer initiates a spinoff pursuant to paragraph (c)(3)
of this section by directing the section 413(e) plan administrator to
spin off amounts attributable to the employees of the
[[Page 17240]]
unresponsive participating employer to a separate single-employer plan
established and maintained by the employer, or to a separate plan
sponsored by the employer that consists of individual retirement
accounts, then the section 413(e) plan administrator must implement and
complete the spinoff as soon as reasonably practicable after the
employer initiates the spinoff. The section 413(e) plan administrator
is treated as satisfying the requirement of the prior sentence if the
spinoff is completed within 180 days of the date on which the
unresponsive participating employer initiates the spinoff.
(e) Required actions following employer's failure to meet
deadline--(1) In general--(i) Deadline for action. If, by the final
deadline described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the
unresponsive participating employer neither takes appropriate remedial
action pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section nor initiates a
spinoff pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, then the
requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this section must be
satisfied.
(ii) Requirements for section 413(e) plan administrator. As soon as
reasonably practicable after the final deadline described in paragraph
(e)(1)(i) of this section, the section 413(e) plan administrator must--
(A) Stop accepting contributions from the unresponsive
participating employer and its employees;
(B) Provide notice to participants who are employees of the
unresponsive participating employer (and their beneficiaries) as
described in paragraph (e)(2) of this section; and
(C) Provide participants who are employees of the unresponsive
participating employer (and their beneficiaries) with an election
regarding treatment of their plan accounts to the extent provided in
paragraph (e)(3) or (4) of this section.
(iii) Timing of distributions. The section 413(e) plan
administrator must distribute benefits as soon as administratively
feasible following an individual's election that is made pursuant to
paragraph (e)(3) or (4) of this section or following the section 413(e)
plan administrator's determination that it is not required to provide
an individual with an election pursuant to paragraph (e)(4)(iv) of this
section.
(2) Contents of notification. The notice required under paragraph
(e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section must include the information described in
this paragraph (e)(2).
(i) No contributions. The notice must state that no further
contributions will be made to the section 413(e) plan on behalf of
participants who are employees of the unresponsive participating
employer.
(ii) Full vesting. The notice must state that participants who are
employees of the unresponsive participating employer have a
nonforfeitable right to amounts credited to their accounts that are
attributable to employment with the unresponsive participating
employer.
(iii) Information about disposition of accounts. The notice must
state that a participant who is an employee of the unresponsive
participating employer (or, if applicable, any beneficiary of the
participant) will receive additional information regarding the
disposition of the participant's or beneficiary's account.
(3) Election for direct rollover or to remain in section 413(e)
plan--(i) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (e)(4) of this
section, a section 413(e) plan administrator must provide participants
who are employees of the unresponsive participating employer (and their
beneficiaries) with an election to have amounts attributable to the
employees of the unresponsive participating employer--
(A) Subject to the rules of paragraph (e)(5) of this section,
directly rolled over to an eligible retirement plan within the meaning
of section 402(c)(8); or
(B) Remain in the section 413(e) plan.
(ii) Default. An individual who fails to make an affirmative
election described in paragraph (e)(3)(i)(A) of this section is treated
as having elected to have the amounts described in paragraph (e)(3)(i)
of this section remain in the section 413(e) plan.
(iii) Individuals remaining in section 413(e) plan. If, pursuant to
paragraph (e)(3)(i)(B) of this section, an individual elects to have
the amounts described in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section remain in
the section 413(e) plan, those amounts must remain in the section
413(e) plan until a distribution is made under the terms of the plan
without regard to section 413(e). To determine whether a participant is
entitled to a distribution upon severance from employment under the
terms of the plan without regard to section 413(e), a section 413(e)
plan administrator may rely on the participant's representation that
the participant has experienced a severance from employment unless the
plan administrator has actual knowledge to the contrary.
(4) Rules for individuals subject to mandatory distributions--(i)
No election to remain in plan. The option to remain in the plan
described in paragraph (e)(3)(i)(B) of this section with respect to
amounts described in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section is not
available to an individual if the terms of the plan would have provided
for a mandatory distribution of those amounts had the participant
experienced a severance from employment. Instead, those amounts must be
distributed from the section 413(e) plan.
(ii) Mandatory distributions subject to automatic rollover. The
portion of the mandatory distribution that is an eligible rollover
distribution subject to section 401(a)(31)(B) must be directly rolled
over to an eligible retirement plan. In accordance with section
401(a)(31)(B), the section 413(e) plan administrator must provide the
individual with an election for the eligible retirement plan to be--
(A) An eligible retirement plan chosen by the individual, or
(B) An individual retirement plan of a designated trustee or
issuer.
(iii) Mandatory distributions not subject to automatic rollover.
For the portion of the mandatory distribution that is an eligible
rollover distribution subject to section 401(a)(31)(A) (but not section
401(a)(31)(B)), the section 413(e) plan administrator must provide the
individual with an election in accordance with section 401(a)(31)(A)
for that portion to be--
(A) Rolled over directly to an eligible retirement plan chosen by
the individual; or
(B) If no eligible retirement plan is chosen pursuant to paragraph
(e)(4)(iii)(A) of this section, paid directly to the individual.
(iv) Individuals who are ineligible for direct rollover. For any
portion of a mandatory distribution that is not subject to the
requirement to offer a direct rollover option under section 401(a)(31),
the section 413(e) plan administrator must pay the individual. For
example, a section 413(e) plan administrator is not required to provide
an election to an individual with an account balance of less than $200
if, consistent with section 411(a)(11) and Sec. 1.401(a)(31)-1, Q&A-
11, plan terms require that mandatory distributions of less than $200
be paid directly to distributees.
(5) Amounts not eligible for rollover. If an individual makes an
election to have an amount described in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this
section directly rolled over to an eligible retirement plan pursuant to
paragraph (e)(3) or (4) of this section, and a portion of the amount is
not an eligible rollover distribution described in section 402(c)(4),
then that portion must be paid directly to the individual. For example,
the portion of a distribution that would be a required minimum
distribution under section
[[Page 17241]]
401(a)(9) must be paid directly to the individual.
(6) Effective opportunity to make election. Any election that is
provided to an individual pursuant to paragraph (e)(3) or (4) of this
section must include an effective opportunity for the individual to
make the election. Whether an individual has an effective opportunity
to make an election is determined based on all the relevant facts and
circumstances, including the adequacy of notice of the availability of
the election, the period of time during which the election may be made,
and any other conditions on the election.
(f) Other rules--(1) Form of notices and elections. Any notice
provided or election made pursuant to paragraph (b) or (e) of this
section must be in written or electronic form. For notices and
elections provided to or made by participants and beneficiaries, see
generally Sec. 1.401(a)-21 for rules permitting the use of electronic
media to provide applicable notices and make participant elections with
respect to retirement plans.
(2) Status of spun-off plan. In the case of any plan that is spun
off in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this section, any
participating employer failure that would have caused the section
413(e) plan to fail to meet the requirements of section 401(a) or 408,
as applicable, but for the application of the exception set forth in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, will result in the spun-off plan
failing to meet those requirements.
(3) Responsible parties. A participating employer demonstrates a
lack of commitment to compliance if the participating employer fails to
take appropriate remedial action pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this
section or initiate a spinoff pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this
section by the final deadline described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section. The IRS reserves the right to pursue appropriate remedies
under the Code against any party (such as the owner of the
participating employer) who is responsible for the failure to satisfy
the requirements of section 401(a) or 408, as applicable, even in the
party's capacity as a participant or beneficiary (such as by not
treating a section 413(e) plan distribution made with respect to the
owner of a participating employer as an eligible rollover
distribution).
(g) Applicability date. This section applies beginning on
[PUBLICATION DATE OF FINAL RULE].
Douglas W. O'Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2022-06005 Filed 3-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P