Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 13926-13930 [2022-05295]
Download as PDF
13926
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
blades that have zero CSN do not need to
undergo the initial 1st-stage LPC blade flow
path and mid span UT inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this AD, but must
undergo the repetitive inspections of
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.
(ii) Within the following compliance times
after the effective date of this AD, perform a
thermal acoustic image (TAI) inspection of
the 1st-stage LPC blades for cracks using a
method approved by the FAA:
(A) For 1st-stage LPC blades with 1,000
CSN or more, with no prior TAI inspection,
inspect before further flight.
(B) For 1st-stage LPC blades with 1,000
flight cycles (FCs) or more since the last TAI
inspection, inspect before further flight.
(C) For 1st-stage LPC blades with fewer
than 1,000 CSN, with no prior TAI
inspection, inspect before accumulating
1,000 CSN.
(D) For 1st-stage LPC blades with fewer
than 1,000 FCs since the last TAI inspection,
inspect before accumulating 1,000 FCs since
the last TAI inspection.
Note 1 to paragraph (g)(1)(ii): The FAAapproved TAI inspection method and the
vendors that can perform the FAA-approved
TAI inspection are specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions section and the
Vendor Services section of PW4G–112–A72–
361, respectively.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
(2) Repetitive 1st-Stage LPC Blade
Inspections
(i) Before exceeding 275 FCs since the last
flow path UT inspection, and thereafter at
intervals not exceeding 275 FCs since the last
flow path UT inspection, perform a flow path
UT inspection of the 1st-stage LPC blades in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part B—Repetitive Inspection of
All LPC Fan Blades After Their Return to
Service, paragraph 1.A., of PW4G–112–A72–
361.
(ii) Before exceeding 550 FCs since the last
mid span UT inspection, and thereafter at
intervals not exceeding 550 FCs since the last
mid span UT inspection, perform a mid span
UT inspection of the 1st-stage LPC blades in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part B—Repetitive Inspection of
All LPC Fan Blades After Their Return to
Service, paragraphs 1.B. and C., of PW4G–
112–A72–361.
(iii) Before exceeding 1,000 FCs since the
last TAI inspection, and thereafter at
intervals not exceeding 1,000 FCs since the
last TAI inspection, perform repetitive TAI
inspections of the 1st-stage LPC blades using
a method approved by the FAA.
Note 2 to paragraph (g)(2)(iii): The FAAapproved TAI inspection method and the
vendors that can perform the FAA-approved
TAI inspection are specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions section and the
Vendor Services section of PW4G–112–A72–
361, respectively.
(3) Removal of the 1st-Stage LPC Blade
If any 1st-stage LPC blade fails any
inspection required by paragraphs (g)(1) or
(2) of this AD, before further flight, remove
the 1st-stage LPC blade from service and
replace with a part eligible for installation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Mar 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
(h) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, a ‘‘part eligible
for installation’’ is a new, zero CSN 1st-stage
LPC blade or a 1st-stage LPC blade that has
passed the inspections required by
paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(i) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits, as described in 14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199, are permitted
provided that the actions in paragraphs (i)(1)
and (2) of this AD have first been
accomplished.
(1) A flow path UT inspection of the 1ststage LPC blades for cracking has been done
within the last 275 FCs, as specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part A—Initial
Inspection of All LPC Fan Blades Prior to
their Return to Service, paragraph 1.A., of
PW4G–112–A72–361, and the 1st-stage LPC
blades have been found serviceable. This
inspection is not required for 1st-stage LPC
blades with 275 CSN or fewer.
(2) A functional check of the left and right
hydraulic pump shutoff valves to ensure they
close in response to the corresponding engine
fire handle input and all applicable
corrective actions (i.e., repair) within 10 days
prior to flight.
Note 3 to paragraph (i)(2): Guidance for
accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD can be found in
the ‘‘Engine-Driven Pump (EDP) Shutoff
Valve Check’’ (Subtasks 26–21–00–200–018,
26–21–00–200–019, 26–21–00–840–022, or
Task 29–11–00–710–806) of Boeing 777–200/
300 Aircraft Maintenance Manual.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and
(i)(1) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD
using the service information specified in
paragraph (j)(1), (2), or (3) of this AD.
(1) Paragraph 2. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Pratt & Whitney Special
Instruction No. 85F21, dated May 12, 2021,
for a flow path UT inspection.
(2) Paragraph 1.a) through c) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Pratt &
Whitney Special Instruction No. 130F–21,
dated July 1, 2021, for a flow path and a mid
span UT inspection.
(3) Paragraph 2.a) through c) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Pratt &
Whitney Special Instruction No. 130F–21,
Revision A, dated July 28, 2021, for a flow
path and a mid span UT inspection.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (l) of this AD. You
may email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@
faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(l) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Carol Nguyen, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781)
238–7655; fax: (781) 238–7199; email:
carol.nguyen@faa.gov.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Pratt & Whitney Alert Service Bulletin
PW4G–112–A72–361, dated October 15,
2021.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Pratt & Whitney Division,
400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT 06118;
phone: (860) 565–0140; email: help24@
prattwhitney.com; website: https://
connect.prattwhitney.com.
(4) You may view this service information
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email: fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
Issued on March 4, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–05296 Filed 3–9–22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0963; Project
Identifier AD–2021–01026–T; Amendment
39–21977; AD 2022–06–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777–200
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
and –300 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of three incidents
involving in-flight fan blade failures on
certain Pratt & Whitney engines (‘‘fan
blades’’ are also known as ‘‘1st-stage
low-pressure compressor (LPC)
blades’’—these terms are used
interchangeably in this AD). This AD
requires modifying the engine inlet to
withstand fan blade failure event loads.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 15,
2022.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of April 15, 2022.
ADDRESSES: For Boeing service
information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For
Pratt & Whitney service information
identified in this AD contact Pratt &
Whitney Division, 400 Main Street, East
Hartford, CT 06118; phone: 860–565–
0140; email: help24@prattwhitney.com;
website: https://
connect.prattwhitney.com. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0963.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0963; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
final rule, any comments received, and
other information. The address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Cortez-Muniz, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:
(206) 231–3958; email: Luis.A.CortezMuniz@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Mar 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 777–200 and –300 series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on December 28, 2021
(86 FR 73688). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of three incidents
involving in-flight fan blade failures on
certain Pratt & Whitney engines. In the
NPRM, the FAA proposed to require
modifying the engine inlet to withstand
fan blade failure event loads. The FAA
is issuing this AD to address the
airplane-level implications of the unsafe
condition of engine fan blade failure.
Fan blade failures can cause fan rotor
imbalance and result in fan blade
fragments penetrating the inner and
outer barrel of the inlet. This condition,
if not addressed could result in engine
in-flight shutdown, and could result in
separation of the inlet, the fan cowl
doors, or the thrust reverser (T/R) cowl,
or result in uncontrolled engine fire.
Separation of the inlet, the fan cowl
doors, or the T/R cowl could result in
impact damage to the empennage and
loss of control of the airplane, or to the
fuselage or windows with potential
injury to passengers; or it could result
in significantly increased aerodynamic
drag causing fuel exhaustion or the
inability to maintain altitude above
terrain during extended operations
(ETOPS) flights, either of which could
result in a forced off-airport landing and
injury to passengers. Uncontrolled
engine fire could result in loss of control
of the airplane.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness
Directive
Comments
The FAA received comments from
The Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA), and two
Anonymous commenters who
supported the NPRM without change.
The FAA received additional
comments from five commenters,
including an Anonymous commenter,
All Nippon Airways (ANA), Boeing,
Japan Airlines (JAL), and United
Airlines (UAL). The following presents
the comments received on the NPRM
and the FAA’s response to each
comment.
Request To Clarify Certain Sentences in
the Background Paragraph
Boeing requested that the
‘‘Background’’ paragraph in the NPRM
be revised to clarify that the failed
hydraulic pump shutoff valve was not
the direct cause of the uncontained
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13927
engine fire. Boeing stated that flight data
indicates that while the hydraulic pump
shutoff valve failed to close, no
hydraulic fluid was leaked from the
system until well after the engine fire
initiated.
Boeing proposed that two sentences
in the ‘‘Background’’ paragraph of the
NPRM be revised to, ‘‘Several
flammable fluid lines, the engine
accessory gearbox, and T/R structure
were fractured and an uncontained
engine fire occurred. The hydraulic
pump shutoff valve failed to close when
the fire handle was pulled, contributing
additional flammable fluid to the T/R
area.’’ Boeing commented that the
proposed wording recognizes that the
failure may have contributed additional
flammable fluid to the T/R area, but that
it did not directly cause the
uncontained fire.
The FAA agrees with the commenter’s
clarification and did not intend to imply
that the failed hydraulic pump shutoff
valve was the direct cause of the
uncontained engine fire. However, the
detailed background information, which
includes the sentences that the
commenter proposed for the
‘‘Background’’ paragraph, are not
carried over into the final rule. The FAA
has not changed this final rule in this
regard.
Request To Use Certain Service
Information as a Method of Compliance
ANA, an Anonymous commenter,
Boeing, and UAL requested the use of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
71A0085 and Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777–71A0093, for doing the
actions in paragraph (g) of the proposed
AD. Boeing stated that the description of
the modification in the proposed AD is
vague.
The FAA disagrees with allowing the
use of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777–71A0085 and Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777–71A0093 for the actions
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
The service bulletins are not yet FAAapproved. However, under the
provisions of paragraph (j) of this AD,
the FAA will consider requests for
approval of the use of the service
bulletins if sufficient data are submitted
to substantiate that the service bulletins
would provide an acceptable level of
safety.
Request To Add Certain Exceptions for
Ferry Flights
JAL requested that the FAA revise the
AD to include certain exceptions for
ferry flights. JAL stated it is planning to
ferry affected airplanes to a storage
point in the United States. JAL
commented that although the local
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
13928
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
authority in Japan provides regulatory
requirements for special flight
permissions which are similar to 14 CFR
21.197, the Japanese regulatory
requirements do not include ‘‘to a point
of storage’’ language for the purpose of
the flights. JAL proposed to add the
following wording to paragraphs (c) and
(g) of the proposed AD, ‘‘except for ferry
flights, without passenger and cargo, of
the airplanes on which the actions
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) of
this AD have been done.’’
The FAA disagrees with revising
paragraph (c) Applicability or paragraph
(g) Modification of this AD in response
to JAL’s comment. Paragraph (i), Special
Flight Permit, provides that special
flight permits, as described in 14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199, are permitted
provided that the actions in paragraphs
(h)(1) and (2) of this AD have first been
accomplished. 14 CFR 21.197(a)(1)
provides, in relevant part, that a special
flight permit may be issued for flying
the aircraft to a base where repairs,
alterations, or maintenance are to be
performed, or to a point of storage. The
requested change is already permitted
by this AD. The FAA did not change
this AD as a result of this comment.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Request To Change the Initial
Compliance Time to Before Revenue
Flight
ANA requested that in paragraph (g)
of the proposed AD, the FAA update the
initial compliance time of ‘‘before
further flight after the effective date of
this AD’’ to ‘‘before the next revenue
flight’’ to clarify the ferry flight
requirement.
Similarly, JAL requested that in
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD, the
FAA update the initial compliance time
of ‘‘before further flight after the
effective of this AD’’ to ‘‘before the next
revenue flight’’ or ‘‘before further flight
except the ferry flight without passenger
and cargos.’’
The FAA disagrees with revising the
initial compliance time in paragraph (g)
of this AD as requested by ANA and
JAL. The FAA has determined it is
necessary to require certain actions
prior to any flight, except as permitted
in paragraph (h), Special Flight Permit,
of this AD.
Request To Provide a Threshold for the
Special Flight Permit
UAL requested that the FAA provide
a threshold in paragraph (h)(1) of the
proposed AD for the flow path UT
inspection. UAL stated that omitting a
compliance time in paragraph (h) of the
proposed AD for the special flight
permits creates ambiguity regarding
when and how often the flow path UT
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Mar 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
inspection is required for special flight
permits. UAL suggested a threshold of
275 flight cycles since the last flow path
UT inspection.
The FAA agrees to add a threshold of
275 cycles to paragraph (h)(1) of this
AD, which is specified in Pratt &
Whitney Alert Service Bulletin PW4G–
112–A72–361, dated October 15, 2021.
This allows airplanes with 1st-stage LPC
blades that have accumulated 275 cycles
since new or fewer to be eligible for a
special flight permit.
Request for an Additional Method of
Compliance
UAL requested that the FAA revise
paragraph (h)(1) of the proposed AD to
add NPRM AD–2021–00830–E (86 FR
73699, December 28, 2021), as a method
of compliance for the flow path
ultrasonic testing (UT) inspection of the
1st-stage LPC blades.
The FAA disagrees with the
commenter’s request. The method of
compliance in Pratt & Whitney Alert
Service Bulletin PW4G–112–A72–361,
dated October 15, 2021, is the same as
paragraph (i)(1) of NPRM AD–2021–
00830–E (86 FR 73699, December 28,
2021) and paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
If the actions in the service information
are accomplished, the requirements in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD will have
been met, and therefore, no change to
this AD has been made.
Request To Add Aircraft Maintenance
Manual Task to Special Flight Permit
ANA and UAL requested that
paragraph (h)(2) of the proposed AD
include Task 29–11–00–710–806 of the
Boeing 777–200/300 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual as an acceptable
method for accomplishing the
functional check of the left and right
hydraulic pump shutoff valves.
The FAA agrees with the commenter’s
request and has added Task 29–11–00–
710–806 of Boeing 777–200/300 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual to the ‘‘Other
Related Service Information’’ paragraph
and to Note (1) to paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD as guidance for accomplishing
the actions required by paragraph (h)(2)
of this AD.
Request To Delegate Alternative
Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
UAL requested that if Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–71A0085 and
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
71A0093 become an FAA-approved
method of compliance, the FAA should
delegate The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) authority to approve structural
related AMOCs when deviations to the
service documents are required.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The FAA acknowledges UAL’s
request, however as stated previously,
the Boeing service bulletins are not yet
FAA-approved, and therefore ODA
authority is not granted at this time. In
the future, should the service bulletins
be approved as a method of compliance
to this AD, the FAA may consider ODA
authority delegation for approval of
structural-related AMOCs for deviations
to the approved method of compliance.
Additional Change Made to This AD
In the process of preparing this final
rule, the FAA noticed that the unsafe
condition statement could be improved
regarding the initial effects of the fan
blade failure and the airplane level
unsafe outcomes that could result from
each of those initial effects. Therefore,
the FAA has updated the unsafe
condition statement in this AD to clarify
the specific causes and hazardous
effects.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data,
considered any comments received, and
determined that air safety requires
adopting this AD as proposed. Except
for minor editorial changes, and any
other changes described previously, this
AD is adopted as proposed in the
NPRM. None of the changes will
increase the economic burden on any
operator.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Pratt & Whitney
Alert Service Bulletin PW4G–112–A72–
361, dated October 15, 2021. This
service information specifies procedures
for performing thermal acoustic image
and ultrasonic testing inspections of 1ststage LPC blades. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in ADDRESSES.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA reviewed Subtasks 26–21–
00–200–018, 26–21–00–200–019, and
26–21–00–840–022, and Task 29–11–
00–710–806, of Boeing 777–200/300
Aircraft Maintenance Manual, dated
September 5, 2021. The service
information specifies procedures for
performing a functional check of the
engine-driven pump shutoff valve.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this AD to be an
interim action. The manufacturer is
currently developing other actions that
will address the unsafe condition
identified in this AD. Once these actions
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
are developed, approved, and available,
the FAA might consider additional
rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 54 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
13929
FAA estimates the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Modification .....................................................
660 work-hours × $85 per hour = $56,100 ....
The FAA has received no definitive
data on which to base the cost estimates
for the on-condition repairs that are part
of the modification specified in this AD.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Mar 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
Parts cost
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
2022–06–11 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–21977; Docket No.
FAA–2021–0963; Project Identifier AD–
2021–01026–T.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective April 15, 2022.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
airplanes, certificated in any category, as
specified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this
AD.
(1) Model 777–200 series airplanes
equipped with Pratt & Whitney PW4074,
PW4074D, PW4077, PW4077D, PW4084D,
PW4090, and PW4090–3 model turbofan
engines.
(2) Model 777–300 series airplanes
equipped with Pratt & Whitney PW4090 and
PW4098 model turbofan engines.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 54, Nacelles/pylons.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of three
incidents involving in-flight fan blade
failures on certain Pratt & Whitney engines.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address engine
fan blade failure, which could result in
engine in-flight shutdown, and could result
in separation of the inlet, the fan cowl doors,
or the thrust reverser (T/R) cowl, or result in
uncontrolled engine fire. Separation of the
inlet, the fan cowl doors, or the T/R cowl
could result in impact damage to the
empennage and loss of control of the
airplane, or to the fuselage or windows with
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$362,560
Cost per
product
$418,660
Cost on U.S.
operators
$22,607,640
potential injury to passengers; or it could
result in significantly increased aerodynamic
drag causing fuel exhaustion or the inability
to maintain altitude above terrain during
extended operations (ETOPS) flights, either
of which could result in a forced off-airport
landing and injury to passengers.
Uncontrolled engine fire could result in loss
of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Modification
Before further flight after the effective date
of this AD, modify the engine inlet to
withstand fan blade failure event loads, in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA.
(h) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits, as described in 14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199, are permitted
provided that the actions in paragraphs (h)(1)
and (2) of this AD have first been
accomplished.
(1) A flow path ultrasonic testing (UT)
inspection of the 1st-stage low-pressure
compressor (LPC) blades for cracking has
been done within the last 275 cycles, as
specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part A—Initial Inspection of All
LPC Fan Blades Prior to their Return to
Service, paragraph 1.A., of Pratt & Whitney
Alert Service Bulletin PW4G–112–A72–361,
dated October 15, 2021, and the 1st-stage LPC
blades have been found serviceable. This
inspection is not required for 1st-stage LPC
blades with 275 cycles since new or fewer.
(2) A functional check of the left and right
hydraulic pump shutoff valves to ensure they
close in response to the corresponding engine
fire handle input and all applicable
corrective actions (i.e., repair) within 10 days
prior to flight.
Note (1) to paragraph (h)(2): Guidance for
accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD can be found in
the ‘‘Engine-Driven Pump (EDP) Shutoff
Valve Check’’ (Subtasks 26–21–00–200–018,
26–21–00–200–019, and 26–21–00–840–022,
or Task 29–11–00–710–806) of Boeing 777–
200/300 Aircraft Maintenance Manual.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this
AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using the service
information specified in paragraph (i)(1), (2),
or (3) of this AD.
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
13930
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Paragraph 2. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Pratt & Whitney Special
Instruction No. 85F–21, dated May 12, 2021,
for a flow path UT inspection.
(2) Paragraph 1.a) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Pratt & Whitney Special
Instruction No. 130F–21, dated July 1, 2021,
for a flow path UT inspection.
(3) Paragraph 2.a) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Pratt & Whitney Special
Instruction No. 130F–21, Revision A, dated
July 28, 2021, for a flow path UT inspection.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Luis Cortez-Muniz, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle
ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: (206)
231–3958; email: Luis.A.Cortez-Muniz@
faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (4) of this AD.
16:15 Mar 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
Issued on March 4, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–05295 Filed 3–9–22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0962; Project
Identifier AD–2021–00997–T; Amendment
39–21976; AD 2022–06–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777–200
and –300 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of three incidents
involving in-flight fan blade failures on
certain Pratt & Whitney engines (‘‘fan
blades’’ are also known as ‘‘1st-stage
low-pressure compressor (LPC)
blades’’—these terms are used
interchangeably in this AD). This AD
requires installation of debris shields on
the thrust reverser (T/R) inner wall at
the left and right sides of the lower
bifurcation, inspection of the fan cowl
doors for moisture ingression, repetitive
functional checks of the hydraulic
pump shutoff valves to ensure they
close in response to the fire handle
input, and corrective actions if
necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 15,
2022.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of April 15, 2022.
ADDRESSES: For Boeing service
information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet
SUMMARY:
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Pratt & Whitney Alert Service Bulletin
PW4G–112–A72–361, dated October 15,
2021.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention:
Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 2600
Westminster Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal
Beach, CA 90740–5600; telephone 562–797–
1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. For Pratt & Whitney
service information identified in this AD
contact Pratt & Whitney Division, 400 Main
Street, East Hartford, CT 06118; phone: 860–
565–0140; email: help24@prattwhitney.com;
website: https://connect.prattwhitney.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For
Pratt & Whitney service information
identified in this AD contact Pratt &
Whitney Division, 400 Main Street, East
Hartford, CT 06118; phone: 860–565–
0140; email: help24@prattwhitney.com;
website: https://
connect.prattwhitney.com. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0962.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0962; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
final rule, any comments received, and
other information. The address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Laubaugh, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–
231–3622; email: james.laubaugh@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 777–200 and –300 series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on December 28, 2021
(86 FR 73712). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of three incidents
involving in-flight fan blade failures on
certain Pratt & Whitney engines. In the
NPRM, the FAA proposed to require
installation of debris shields on the T/
R inner wall at the left and right sides
of the lower bifurcation, inspection of
the fan cowl doors for moisture
ingression, repetitive functional checks
of the hydraulic pump shutoff valves to
ensure they close in response to the fire
handle input, and corrective actions if
necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address the airplane-level
implications of the unsafe condition of
engine fan blade failure. Fan blade
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13926-13930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05295]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0963; Project Identifier AD-2021-01026-T;
Amendment 39-21977; AD 2022-06-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 777-200
[[Page 13927]]
and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of three
incidents involving in-flight fan blade failures on certain Pratt &
Whitney engines (``fan blades'' are also known as ``1st-stage low-
pressure compressor (LPC) blades''--these terms are used
interchangeably in this AD). This AD requires modifying the engine
inlet to withstand fan blade failure event loads. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 15, 2022.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 15,
2022.
ADDRESSES: For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For Pratt & Whitney service information
identified in this AD contact Pratt & Whitney Division, 400 Main
Street, East Hartford, CT 06118; phone: 860-565-0140; email:
[email protected]; website: https://connect.prattwhitney.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206-231-3195. It is also available at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0963.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0963; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Cortez-Muniz, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: (206) 231-3958; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing
Company Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on December 28, 2021 (86 FR 73688). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of three incidents involving in-flight fan blade
failures on certain Pratt & Whitney engines. In the NPRM, the FAA
proposed to require modifying the engine inlet to withstand fan blade
failure event loads. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
airplane-level implications of the unsafe condition of engine fan blade
failure. Fan blade failures can cause fan rotor imbalance and result in
fan blade fragments penetrating the inner and outer barrel of the
inlet. This condition, if not addressed could result in engine in-
flight shutdown, and could result in separation of the inlet, the fan
cowl doors, or the thrust reverser (T/R) cowl, or result in
uncontrolled engine fire. Separation of the inlet, the fan cowl doors,
or the T/R cowl could result in impact damage to the empennage and loss
of control of the airplane, or to the fuselage or windows with
potential injury to passengers; or it could result in significantly
increased aerodynamic drag causing fuel exhaustion or the inability to
maintain altitude above terrain during extended operations (ETOPS)
flights, either of which could result in a forced off-airport landing
and injury to passengers. Uncontrolled engine fire could result in loss
of control of the airplane.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive
Comments
The FAA received comments from The Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA), and two Anonymous commenters who supported the
NPRM without change.
The FAA received additional comments from five commenters,
including an Anonymous commenter, All Nippon Airways (ANA), Boeing,
Japan Airlines (JAL), and United Airlines (UAL). The following presents
the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each
comment.
Request To Clarify Certain Sentences in the Background Paragraph
Boeing requested that the ``Background'' paragraph in the NPRM be
revised to clarify that the failed hydraulic pump shutoff valve was not
the direct cause of the uncontained engine fire. Boeing stated that
flight data indicates that while the hydraulic pump shutoff valve
failed to close, no hydraulic fluid was leaked from the system until
well after the engine fire initiated.
Boeing proposed that two sentences in the ``Background'' paragraph
of the NPRM be revised to, ``Several flammable fluid lines, the engine
accessory gearbox, and T/R structure were fractured and an uncontained
engine fire occurred. The hydraulic pump shutoff valve failed to close
when the fire handle was pulled, contributing additional flammable
fluid to the T/R area.'' Boeing commented that the proposed wording
recognizes that the failure may have contributed additional flammable
fluid to the T/R area, but that it did not directly cause the
uncontained fire.
The FAA agrees with the commenter's clarification and did not
intend to imply that the failed hydraulic pump shutoff valve was the
direct cause of the uncontained engine fire. However, the detailed
background information, which includes the sentences that the commenter
proposed for the ``Background'' paragraph, are not carried over into
the final rule. The FAA has not changed this final rule in this regard.
Request To Use Certain Service Information as a Method of Compliance
ANA, an Anonymous commenter, Boeing, and UAL requested the use of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-71A0085 and Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-71A0093, for doing the actions in paragraph (g) of the
proposed AD. Boeing stated that the description of the modification in
the proposed AD is vague.
The FAA disagrees with allowing the use of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-71A0085 and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-71A0093 for
the actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD. The service
bulletins are not yet FAA-approved. However, under the provisions of
paragraph (j) of this AD, the FAA will consider requests for approval
of the use of the service bulletins if sufficient data are submitted to
substantiate that the service bulletins would provide an acceptable
level of safety.
Request To Add Certain Exceptions for Ferry Flights
JAL requested that the FAA revise the AD to include certain
exceptions for ferry flights. JAL stated it is planning to ferry
affected airplanes to a storage point in the United States. JAL
commented that although the local
[[Page 13928]]
authority in Japan provides regulatory requirements for special flight
permissions which are similar to 14 CFR 21.197, the Japanese regulatory
requirements do not include ``to a point of storage'' language for the
purpose of the flights. JAL proposed to add the following wording to
paragraphs (c) and (g) of the proposed AD, ``except for ferry flights,
without passenger and cargo, of the airplanes on which the actions
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) of this AD have been done.''
The FAA disagrees with revising paragraph (c) Applicability or
paragraph (g) Modification of this AD in response to JAL's comment.
Paragraph (i), Special Flight Permit, provides that special flight
permits, as described in 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199, are permitted
provided that the actions in paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) of this AD have
first been accomplished. 14 CFR 21.197(a)(1) provides, in relevant
part, that a special flight permit may be issued for flying the
aircraft to a base where repairs, alterations, or maintenance are to be
performed, or to a point of storage. The requested change is already
permitted by this AD. The FAA did not change this AD as a result of
this comment.
Request To Change the Initial Compliance Time to Before Revenue Flight
ANA requested that in paragraph (g) of the proposed AD, the FAA
update the initial compliance time of ``before further flight after the
effective date of this AD'' to ``before the next revenue flight'' to
clarify the ferry flight requirement.
Similarly, JAL requested that in paragraph (g) of the proposed AD,
the FAA update the initial compliance time of ``before further flight
after the effective of this AD'' to ``before the next revenue flight''
or ``before further flight except the ferry flight without passenger
and cargos.''
The FAA disagrees with revising the initial compliance time in
paragraph (g) of this AD as requested by ANA and JAL. The FAA has
determined it is necessary to require certain actions prior to any
flight, except as permitted in paragraph (h), Special Flight Permit, of
this AD.
Request To Provide a Threshold for the Special Flight Permit
UAL requested that the FAA provide a threshold in paragraph (h)(1)
of the proposed AD for the flow path UT inspection. UAL stated that
omitting a compliance time in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD for the
special flight permits creates ambiguity regarding when and how often
the flow path UT inspection is required for special flight permits. UAL
suggested a threshold of 275 flight cycles since the last flow path UT
inspection.
The FAA agrees to add a threshold of 275 cycles to paragraph (h)(1)
of this AD, which is specified in Pratt & Whitney Alert Service
Bulletin PW4G-112-A72-361, dated October 15, 2021. This allows
airplanes with 1st-stage LPC blades that have accumulated 275 cycles
since new or fewer to be eligible for a special flight permit.
Request for an Additional Method of Compliance
UAL requested that the FAA revise paragraph (h)(1) of the proposed
AD to add NPRM AD-2021-00830-E (86 FR 73699, December 28, 2021), as a
method of compliance for the flow path ultrasonic testing (UT)
inspection of the 1st-stage LPC blades.
The FAA disagrees with the commenter's request. The method of
compliance in Pratt & Whitney Alert Service Bulletin PW4G-112-A72-361,
dated October 15, 2021, is the same as paragraph (i)(1) of NPRM AD-
2021-00830-E (86 FR 73699, December 28, 2021) and paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD. If the actions in the service information are accomplished,
the requirements in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD will have been met, and
therefore, no change to this AD has been made.
Request To Add Aircraft Maintenance Manual Task to Special Flight
Permit
ANA and UAL requested that paragraph (h)(2) of the proposed AD
include Task 29-11-00-710-806 of the Boeing 777-200/300 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual as an acceptable method for accomplishing the
functional check of the left and right hydraulic pump shutoff valves.
The FAA agrees with the commenter's request and has added Task 29-
11-00-710-806 of Boeing 777-200/300 Aircraft Maintenance Manual to the
``Other Related Service Information'' paragraph and to Note (1) to
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD as guidance for accomplishing the actions
required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.
Request To Delegate Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
UAL requested that if Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-71A0085 and
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-71A0093 become an FAA-approved method
of compliance, the FAA should delegate The Boeing Company Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) authority to approve structural related
AMOCs when deviations to the service documents are required.
The FAA acknowledges UAL's request, however as stated previously,
the Boeing service bulletins are not yet FAA-approved, and therefore
ODA authority is not granted at this time. In the future, should the
service bulletins be approved as a method of compliance to this AD, the
FAA may consider ODA authority delegation for approval of structural-
related AMOCs for deviations to the approved method of compliance.
Additional Change Made to This AD
In the process of preparing this final rule, the FAA noticed that
the unsafe condition statement could be improved regarding the initial
effects of the fan blade failure and the airplane level unsafe outcomes
that could result from each of those initial effects. Therefore, the
FAA has updated the unsafe condition statement in this AD to clarify
the specific causes and hazardous effects.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Except for minor editorial changes, and any other changes
described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None
of the changes will increase the economic burden on any operator.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Pratt & Whitney Alert Service Bulletin PW4G-112-
A72-361, dated October 15, 2021. This service information specifies
procedures for performing thermal acoustic image and ultrasonic testing
inspections of 1st-stage LPC blades. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
ADDRESSES.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA reviewed Subtasks 26-21-00-200-018, 26-21-00-200-019, and
26-21-00-840-022, and Task 29-11-00-710-806, of Boeing 777-200/300
Aircraft Maintenance Manual, dated September 5, 2021. The service
information specifies procedures for performing a functional check of
the engine-driven pump shutoff valve.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this AD to be an interim action. The manufacturer
is currently developing other actions that will address the unsafe
condition identified in this AD. Once these actions
[[Page 13929]]
are developed, approved, and available, the FAA might consider
additional rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 54 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification.......................... 660 work-hours x $85 per $362,560 $418,660 $22,607,640
hour = $56,100.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost
estimates for the on-condition repairs that are part of the
modification specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2022-06-11 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-21977; Docket No. FAA-
2021-0963; Project Identifier AD-2021-01026-T.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 15, 2022.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company airplanes, certificated in
any category, as specified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this AD.
(1) Model 777-200 series airplanes equipped with Pratt & Whitney
PW4074, PW4074D, PW4077, PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3
model turbofan engines.
(2) Model 777-300 series airplanes equipped with Pratt & Whitney
PW4090 and PW4098 model turbofan engines.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54, Nacelles/
pylons.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of three incidents involving in-
flight fan blade failures on certain Pratt & Whitney engines. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address engine fan blade failure, which
could result in engine in-flight shutdown, and could result in
separation of the inlet, the fan cowl doors, or the thrust reverser
(T/R) cowl, or result in uncontrolled engine fire. Separation of the
inlet, the fan cowl doors, or the T/R cowl could result in impact
damage to the empennage and loss of control of the airplane, or to
the fuselage or windows with potential injury to passengers; or it
could result in significantly increased aerodynamic drag causing
fuel exhaustion or the inability to maintain altitude above terrain
during extended operations (ETOPS) flights, either of which could
result in a forced off-airport landing and injury to passengers.
Uncontrolled engine fire could result in loss of control of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Modification
Before further flight after the effective date of this AD,
modify the engine inlet to withstand fan blade failure event loads,
in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, FAA.
(h) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits, as described in 14 CFR 21.197 and
21.199, are permitted provided that the actions in paragraphs (h)(1)
and (2) of this AD have first been accomplished.
(1) A flow path ultrasonic testing (UT) inspection of the 1st-
stage low-pressure compressor (LPC) blades for cracking has been
done within the last 275 cycles, as specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part A--Initial Inspection of All LPC Fan Blades Prior
to their Return to Service, paragraph 1.A., of Pratt & Whitney Alert
Service Bulletin PW4G-112-A72-361, dated October 15, 2021, and the
1st-stage LPC blades have been found serviceable. This inspection is
not required for 1st-stage LPC blades with 275 cycles since new or
fewer.
(2) A functional check of the left and right hydraulic pump
shutoff valves to ensure they close in response to the corresponding
engine fire handle input and all applicable corrective actions
(i.e., repair) within 10 days prior to flight.
Note (1) to paragraph (h)(2): Guidance for accomplishing the
actions required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD can be found in the
``Engine-Driven Pump (EDP) Shutoff Valve Check'' (Subtasks 26-21-00-
200-018, 26-21-00-200-019, and 26-21-00-840-022, or Task 29-11-00-
710-806) of Boeing 777-200/300 Aircraft Maintenance Manual.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using the service information
specified in paragraph (i)(1), (2), or (3) of this AD.
[[Page 13930]]
(1) Paragraph 2. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Pratt &
Whitney Special Instruction No. 85F-21, dated May 12, 2021, for a
flow path UT inspection.
(2) Paragraph 1.a) of the Accomplishment Instructions of Pratt &
Whitney Special Instruction No. 130F-21, dated July 1, 2021, for a
flow path UT inspection.
(3) Paragraph 2.a) of the Accomplishment Instructions of Pratt &
Whitney Special Instruction No. 130F-21, Revision A, dated July 28,
2021, for a flow path UT inspection.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Luis Cortez-
Muniz, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:
(206) 231-3958; email: [email protected].
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Pratt & Whitney Alert Service Bulletin PW4G-112-A72-361,
dated October 15, 2021.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For Pratt & Whitney service information
identified in this AD contact Pratt & Whitney Division, 400 Main
Street, East Hartford, CT 06118; phone: 860-565-0140; email:
[email protected]; website: https://connect.prattwhitney.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on March 4, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-05295 Filed 3-9-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P