Potassium Acetate; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 11319-11322 [2022-04078]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
fluorophenyl]propan-2-ol, in or on
almond at 0.01 ppm; almond, hulls at 3
ppm; and fruit, pome, group 11–10 at
0.15 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerances in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Feb 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
11319
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)
Commodity
Parts per
million
Almond ..................................
Almond, hulls ........................
Fruit, pome, group 11–10 .....
0.01
3
0.15
(b)–(d) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2022–04264 Filed 2–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VII. Congressional Review Act
40 CFR Part 180
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0349; FRL–9550–01–
OCSPP]
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 23, 2022.
Edward Messina,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Add § 180.719 to subpart C to read
as follows:
■
§ 180.719 Ipflufenoquin; tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for residues of the fungicide
ipflufenoquin, including its metabolites
and degradates, in or on the
commodities to Table 1 of this section.
Compliance with the tolerance levels
specified in Table 1 is to be determined
by measuring only ipflufenoquin, 2[(7,8-difluoro-2-methyl-3quinolinyl)oxy]-6-fluoro-a,adimethylbenzenemethanol, in or on the
commodities.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Potassium Acetate; Exemption From
the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of potassium
acetate (CAS Reg. No. 127–08–2) when
used as an inert ingredient (nutrient) in
pesticide formulations applied to
growing crops only. Valagro S.p.A.
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting establishment of an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for potassium acetate. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of potassium acetate when
used in accordance with this exemption.
DATES: This regulation is effective
March 1, 2022. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or
before May 2, 2022, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0349, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11320
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
closed to visitors with limited
exceptions. The staff continues to
provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC
services and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main
telephone number: (703) 305–7090;
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Office of the Federal
Register’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2020–0349 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before May
2, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand
delivery of objections and hearing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Feb 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2020–0349, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be CBI
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of September
10, 2020 (85 FR 55810) (FRL–10013–78),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP IN–11369) by SciReg, Inc.,
on behalf of Valagro S.p.A., 12733
Director’s Loop, Woodbridge, VA 22192.
The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.920 be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of potassium
acetate (CAS Reg. No. 127–08–2) when
used as an inert ingredient (nutrient) in
pesticide formulations applied preharvest. That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by
SciReg, Inc., on behalf of Valagro S.p.A.,
the petitioner, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that EPA has
determined that ‘‘there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue, including all
anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but it does not
include occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing an
exemption and to ‘‘ensure that there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue.’’
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be clearly
demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide
chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no
harm to human health. In order to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide inert ingredients,
the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible
exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water,
and through other exposures that occur
as a result of pesticide use in residential
settings. If EPA is able to determine that
a tolerance is not necessary to ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure to potassium acetate
including exposure resulting from the
exemption established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with potassium acetate
follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as
well as the relationship of the results of
the studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. Specific
information on the studies received and
the nature of the adverse effects caused
by potassium acetate as well as the noobserved-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL)
and the lowest-observed-adverse-effectlevel (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies
are discussed in this unit.
Available acute toxicity studies show
potassium acetate exhibits low oral,
dermal, and inhalation toxicity. An eye
irritation study showed mild effects,
and a dermal irritation study showed no
effect of treatment.
Potassium acetate is the potassium
salt of acetic acid. In aqueous solutions
potassium acetate dissociates to
potassium and the acetate ion. As one
of the salts of acetic acid, sodium
acetate, like potassium acetate,
dissociates in aqueous solutions to the
acetate ion and a counter ion, in this
case sodium. Based on their similarities
(e.g., physical/chemical properties,
chemical structure, subsequent
dissociation into the acetate ion and
corresponding anion) data on sodium
acetate has been used to support the
safety determination for potassium
acetate when chemical specific data was
not available.
No adverse effects of treatment were
seen in rats treated with sodium acetate
in either a 4-week oral toxicity study or
a developmental toxicity study at the
highest dose tested. Therefore, the
NOAEL for the 4-week study was 3,600
mg/kg/day and the parental and
developmental NOAELs were 1,000 mg/
kg/day.
There was no evidence of
carcinogenicity or neuropathological
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Feb 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
changes or effects reported in any of the
studies on potassium acetate or sodium
acetate. There were no in vitro
mutagenic effects in mutagenicity
testing with sodium acetate. Therefore,
there is low concern for carcinogenicity
or neurotoxicity for potassium acetate.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
No toxicological endpoint of concern
for potassium acetate has been
identified in the database.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food, feed
uses, and drinking water. In evaluating
dietary exposure to potassium acetate,
EPA considered exposure under the
current and proposed uses of potassium
acetate. Dietary exposure to potassium
acetate may occur from eating foods
treated with pesticide formulations
containing this inert ingredient and
drinking water containing runoff from
soils containing the treated crops. In
addition, potassium acetate is used as a
food additive. However, no toxicological
endpoint of concern was identified for
potassium acetate, and therefore, a
quantitative assessment of dietary
exposure is not necessary.
2. Non-dietary exposure. The term
‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in this
document to refer to non-occupational,
non-dietary exposure (e.g., textiles
(clothing and diapers), carpets,
swimming pools, and hard surface
disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
Residential exposure to potassium
acetate may occur based on its use as an
inert ingredient in pesticide
formulations registered for residential
uses. Additional non-dietary exposure
may occur from use of potassium acetate
in consumer products. However, no
toxicological endpoint of concern was
identified for potassium acetate, and
therefore, a quantitative residential
exposure assessment for potassium
acetate was not conducted.
3. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance or exemption, the Agency
consider ‘‘available information’’
concerning the cumulative effects of a
particular pesticide’s residues and
‘‘other substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found potassium acetate
to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and
potassium acetate does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of
this action, therefore, EPA has assumed
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11321
that potassium acetate does not have a
common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA
requires EPA to retain an additional
tenfold margin of safety in the case of
threshold effects to ensure that there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. As noted in Unit
IV.B., there is no indication of threshold
effects being caused by potassium
acetate. Due to the lack of any
toxicological endpoints of concern, EPA
conducted a qualitative assessment of
potassium acetate, which does not use
safety factors for assessing risk, and no
additional safety factor is needed for
assessing risk to infants and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
Taking into consideration all available
information on potassium acetate, EPA
has determined that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm to the
general population or any population
subgroup, including infants and
children, will result from aggregate
exposure to potassium acetate residues.
Therefore, the establishment of an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under 40 CFR 180.920 for
residues of potassium acetate when
used as an inert ingredient in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops is
safe under FFDCA section 408.
V. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
under 40 CFR 180.920 for potassium
acetate (CAS Reg. No. 84632–65–5)
when used as an inert ingredient
(nutrient) in pesticide formulations
applied to growing crops only.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
11322
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance exemption in this final
rule, do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Feb 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 17, 2022.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, 40 CFR chapter I is amended
as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.920, amend Table 1 to
180.920 by adding in alphabetical order
the inert ingredient ‘‘Potassium acetate
(CAS Reg. No. 127–08–2)’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 180.920 Inert ingredients used preharvest; exemptions from the requirement
of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO 180.920
Inert ingredients
Limits
*
*
*
Potassium acetate (CAS
Reg. No. 127–08–2).
*
............
*
*
*
*
Uses
*
Nutrient.
*
[FR Doc. 2022–04078 Filed 2–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 220216–0050]
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
*
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
RIN 0648–BK44
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Consistency Modifications and
Corrections
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; technical corrections.
AGENCY:
This final rule makes editorial
corrections to the regulations for
Atlantic highly migratory species
(HMS). This final rule corrects citations
that are currently incorrect due to
changes to references in other parts of
the regulations. In addition, this final
action corrects minor technical items in
the regulations that are missing,
inconsistent, or incorrect, and also
clarifies extraneous language to make
the regulations more readable. The rule
is administrative in nature and does not
make any change with substantive effect
to the regulations for HMS fisheries.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 1, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Documents related to HMS
fisheries management, such as the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS Fishery
Management Plan (2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP) and its amendments, are
available from the HMS Management
Division website at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantichighly-migratory-species or upon
request from the HMS Management
Division by phone at 301–427–8503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Redd, Jr., larry.redd@noaa.gov,
Thomas Warren, thomas.warren@
noaa.gov, or Steve Durkee,
steve.durkee@noaa.gov, by phone at
301–427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Atlantic
HMS fisheries are managed under the
dual authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.) and the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA; 16 U.S.C. 971 et
seq.). The 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP
and its amendments are implemented
by regulations at 50 CFR part 635.
SUMMARY:
Background
Since publishing the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP, NMFS has
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11319-11322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04078]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0349; FRL-9550-01-OCSPP]
Potassium Acetate; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of potassium acetate (CAS Reg. No. 127-08-
2) when used as an inert ingredient (nutrient) in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops only. Valagro S.p.A. submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
requesting establishment of an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for potassium acetate. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of potassium acetate
when used in accordance with this exemption.
DATES: This regulation is effective March 1, 2022. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before May 2, 2022, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0349, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg.,
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
[[Page 11320]]
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register's e-CFR site at
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0349 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
May 2, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0349, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of September 10, 2020 (85 FR 55810) (FRL-
10013-78), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21
U.S.C. 346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-
11369) by SciReg, Inc., on behalf of Valagro S.p.A., 12733 Director's
Loop, Woodbridge, VA 22192. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.920
be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of potassium acetate (CAS Reg. No. 127-08-2)
when used as an inert ingredient (nutrient) in pesticide formulations
applied pre-harvest. That document referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by SciReg, Inc., on behalf of Valagro S.p.A., the petitioner,
which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There
were no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ``safe'' to mean that EPA has determined that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but it does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing an exemption and to ``ensure that
there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue.''
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no harm to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the inert ingredient, an
[[Page 11321]]
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure to potassium acetate including
exposure resulting from the exemption established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with potassium acetate
follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by potassium acetate as well as the no-
observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-
effect-level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in this
unit.
Available acute toxicity studies show potassium acetate exhibits
low oral, dermal, and inhalation toxicity. An eye irritation study
showed mild effects, and a dermal irritation study showed no effect of
treatment.
Potassium acetate is the potassium salt of acetic acid. In aqueous
solutions potassium acetate dissociates to potassium and the acetate
ion. As one of the salts of acetic acid, sodium acetate, like potassium
acetate, dissociates in aqueous solutions to the acetate ion and a
counter ion, in this case sodium. Based on their similarities (e.g.,
physical/chemical properties, chemical structure, subsequent
dissociation into the acetate ion and corresponding anion) data on
sodium acetate has been used to support the safety determination for
potassium acetate when chemical specific data was not available.
No adverse effects of treatment were seen in rats treated with
sodium acetate in either a 4-week oral toxicity study or a
developmental toxicity study at the highest dose tested. Therefore, the
NOAEL for the 4-week study was 3,600 mg/kg/day and the parental and
developmental NOAELs were 1,000 mg/kg/day.
There was no evidence of carcinogenicity or neuropathological
changes or effects reported in any of the studies on potassium acetate
or sodium acetate. There were no in vitro mutagenic effects in
mutagenicity testing with sodium acetate. Therefore, there is low
concern for carcinogenicity or neurotoxicity for potassium acetate.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
No toxicological endpoint of concern for potassium acetate has been
identified in the database.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food, feed uses, and drinking water. In
evaluating dietary exposure to potassium acetate, EPA considered
exposure under the current and proposed uses of potassium acetate.
Dietary exposure to potassium acetate may occur from eating foods
treated with pesticide formulations containing this inert ingredient
and drinking water containing runoff from soils containing the treated
crops. In addition, potassium acetate is used as a food additive.
However, no toxicological endpoint of concern was identified for
potassium acetate, and therefore, a quantitative assessment of dietary
exposure is not necessary.
2. Non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is used
in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming pools, and
hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables). Residential
exposure to potassium acetate may occur based on its use as an inert
ingredient in pesticide formulations registered for residential uses.
Additional non-dietary exposure may occur from use of potassium acetate
in consumer products. However, no toxicological endpoint of concern was
identified for potassium acetate, and therefore, a quantitative
residential exposure assessment for potassium acetate was not
conducted.
3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance or
exemption, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found potassium acetate to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and potassium acetate does not
appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For
the purposes of this action, therefore, EPA has assumed that potassium
acetate does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to retain an
additional tenfold margin of safety in the case of threshold effects to
ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. As noted in Unit IV.B., there is no indication of threshold
effects being caused by potassium acetate. Due to the lack of any
toxicological endpoints of concern, EPA conducted a qualitative
assessment of potassium acetate, which does not use safety factors for
assessing risk, and no additional safety factor is needed for assessing
risk to infants and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
Taking into consideration all available information on potassium
acetate, EPA has determined that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm to the general population or any population subgroup, including
infants and children, will result from aggregate exposure to potassium
acetate residues. Therefore, the establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance under 40 CFR 180.920 for residues of
potassium acetate when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops is safe under FFDCA section 408.
V. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established under 40 CFR 180.920 for potassium acetate (CAS Reg. No.
84632-65-5) when used as an inert ingredient (nutrient) in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops only.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in
[[Page 11322]]
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance
exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 17, 2022.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR chapter I
is amended as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.920, amend Table 1 to 180.920 by adding in alphabetical
order the inert ingredient ``Potassium acetate (CAS Reg. No. 127-08-
2)'' to read as follows:
Sec. 180.920 Inert ingredients used pre-harvest; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
* * * * *
Table 1 to 180.920
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Potassium acetate (CAS Reg. No. 127-08- ....... Nutrient.
2).
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2022-04078 Filed 2-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P