Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 10792-10795 [2022-03958]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10792
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2022 / Notices
requirements in the Alternative Fuels
Rule (‘‘Rule’’). That clearance expires on
March 30, 2022.
DATES: Comments must be submitted by
March 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under Review—Open for
Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hampton Newsome, Attorney, (202)
326–2889, Division of Enforcement,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal
Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Labeling Requirements for
Alternative Fuels and Alternative
Fueled Vehicles (‘‘Alternative Fuels
Rule’’), 16 CFR part 309.
OMB Control Number: 3084–0094.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Private Sector:
Businesses and other for-profit entities.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
6,000 hours.
Estimated Annual Labor Costs:
$175,298.
Estimated Non-Labor Costs: $3,040.
Abstract: The Energy Policy Act of
1992 established federal programs to
encourage the development of
alternative fuels and alternative fueled
vehicles (‘‘AFVs’’). Section 406(a) of the
Act directed the Commission to
establish uniform labeling requirements
for alternative fuels and AFVs. 42 U.S.C.
13232(a). Such labels must provide
‘‘appropriate information with respect
to costs and benefits [of alternative fuels
and AFVs], so as to reasonably enable
the consumer to make choices and
comparisons.’’ The required labels must
be ‘‘simple and, where appropriate,
consolidated with other labels providing
information to the consumer.’’
Pursuant to the Act, the Commission
published the Alternative Fuels Rule in
1995, and the Rule was later amended
in 2013. The Rule requires disclosure of
specific information on labels posted on
fuel dispensers for non-liquid
alternative fuels. To ensure the accuracy
of these disclosures, the Rule also
requires that sellers maintain records
substantiating product-specific
disclosures they include on these labels.
In addition, the Rule requires that
distributors of non-liquid alternative
vehicle fuel provide certifications of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
fuel rating in each transfer to anyone
who is not a consumer.
Request for Comment: On October 6,
2021, the Commission sought comment
on the information collection
requirements associated with the
Privacy Rule. 86 FR 55607 (Oct. 6,
2021). No relevant comments were
received. Pursuant to the OMB
regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, the FTC is
providing this second opportunity for
public comment while seeking OMB
approval to renew clearance for the
Rule’s information collection
requirements.
Your comment—including your name
and your state—will be placed on the
public record of this proceeding.
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive personal
information, like anyone’s Social
Security number, date of birth, driver’s
license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, do not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is . . .
privileged or confidential’’ as provided
in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
Josephine Liu,
Assistant General Counsel for Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2022–03956 Filed 2–24–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
Federal Trade Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC or Commission) is seeking public
comment on its proposal to extend for
an additional three years the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
clearance for information collection
requirements contained in the rules and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
regulations under the Health Breach
Notification Rule (or Rule). That
clearance expires on June 30, 2022.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 26, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comments part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Health Breach
Notification Rule; PRA Comment: FTC
File No. P072108’’ on your comment,
and file your comment online at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite
CC–5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex J),
Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Mehm, Attorney, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, (202) 326–2918,
Federal Trade Commission, 600
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Health Breach Notification Rule.
OMB Control Number: 3084–0150.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: The Health Breach
Notification Rule (Rule), 16 CFR part
318, requires vendors of personal health
records (PHR) and PHR related entities
to provide notice to: (1) Consumers
whose unsecured personally identifiable
health information has been reached; (2)
the Commission; and (3) in some cases,
the media. The Rule only applies to
electronic health records and does not
include recordkeeping requirements.
The Rule requires third party service
providers (e.g., those companies that
provide services such as billing or data
storage) to vendors of personal health
records and PHR related entities to
provide notification to such vendors
and PHR related entities following the
discovery of a breach. To notify the FTC
of a breach, the Commission developed
a simple, two-page form, which is
posted at https://www.ftc.gov/system/
files/documents/rules/health-breachnotification-rule/health_breach_
form.pdf
Likely Respondents: Vendors of
personal health records, PHR related
entities and third party service
providers.
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2022 / Notices
Estimated Annual Hours Burden:
4,654.
Estimated Frequency: 2,500 singleperson breaches per year and 0.33 major
breaches per year.
Total Annual Labor Cost: $90,741.
Total Annual Capital or Other NonLabor Cost: $31,056.
As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A)
of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), the
FTC is providing this opportunity for
public comment before requesting that
OMB extend the existing clearance for
the information collection requirements
contained in the Commission’s Health
Breach Notification Rule.
Burden Estimates
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Brief Description of the Need for and
Proposed Use of the Information
The Health Breach Notification Rule
(Rule), 16 CFR part 318 (OMB Control
Number 3084–0150), requires vendors
of personal health records and PHR
related entities to provide notice to: (1)
Consumers whose unsecured personally
identifiable health information has been
breached; (2) the Commission; and (3) in
some cases, the media.1 Under the Rule,
consumers whose unsecured,
individually identifiable health
information has been breached must
receive notice ‘‘without unreasonable
delay and in no case later than 60
calendar days’’ after discovery of the
breach. Among other information, the
notices must provide consumers with
steps they can take to protect
themselves from potential harm
resulting from the breach. To notify the
FTC of a breach, the Commission
developed a simple, two-page form,
which is posted at https://www.ftc.gov/
system/files/documents/rules/healthbreach-notification-rule/health_breach_
form.pdf. For breaches involving the
health information of 500 or more
individuals, entities must notify the
Commission as soon as possible, and in
any event no later than ten business
days after discovering the breach.
Entities may report all breaches
involving the information of fewer than
500 individuals in an annual
submission covering the prior calendar
year. The Commission uses entities’
notifications to compile a list of
1 On September 15, 2021, the Commission, in
light of changes in the marketplace, issued a Policy
Statement that clarified that the Rule applies to
most health apps and similar technologies that are
not covered by the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (‘‘HIPAA’’). Statement of the
Commission on Breaches by Health Apps and Other
Connected Devices, Fed. Trade Comm’n (Sept. 15,
2021), available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/
files/documents/public_statements/1596364/
statement_of_the_commission_on_breaches_by_
health_apps_and_other_connected_devices.pdf
(‘‘Policy Statement’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
breaches affecting 500 or more
individuals that is publicly available on
the FTC’s website. The list provides
businesses with information about
potential sources of data breaches,
which is helpful to those developing
data security procedures. It also
provides the public with information
about the extent of data breaches.
The Rule also requires third party
service providers (e.g., those companies
that provide services such as billing or
data storage) to vendors of personal
health records and PHR related entities
to provide notification to such vendors
and PHR related entities following the
discovery of a breach.
The Rule only applies to electronic
health records and does not include
recordkeeping requirements.
As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A)
of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), the
FTC is providing this opportunity for
public comment before requesting that
OMB extend the existing clearance for
the information collection requirements
contained in the Rule.
Burden Estimates
The PRA burden of the Rule’s
requirements depends on a variety of
factors, including the number of covered
firms; the percentage of such firms that
will experience a breach requiring
further investigation and, if necessary,
the sending of breach notices; and the
number of consumers notified. The
annual hours and cost estimates below
likely overstate the burden because,
among other things, they assume,
though it is not necessarily so, that all
covered firms experiencing breaches
subject to the Rule’s notification
requirements will be required to take all
of the steps described below.
The analysis may also overstate the
burden of the Rule’s requirements
because it assumes that covered firms
would not take any of the steps
described were it not for the
requirements of the Rule. For example,
the analysis incorporates labor costs
associated with understanding what
information has been breached. It seems
likely that some firms would incur such
costs even in the absence of the Rule’s
requirements because the firms are
independently interested in identifying,
understanding, and remediating security
risks. A company that investigates, for
its own purposes, what information has
been breached is unlikely to fully
duplicate the costs of that investigation
in complying with the Rule. Therefore,
it may not be correct in all cases that
complying with the Rule results in
added labor costs for this activity.
Nevertheless, in order to allow for a
complete understanding of all the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10793
potential costs associated with
compliance, these costs are included in
this analysis.
At the time the Rule was issued in
2009, insufficient data was available
about the incidence of breaches in the
PHR industry. Accordingly, staff based
its burden estimate on data pertaining to
private sector breaches across multiple
industries. Staff estimated that there
would be 11 breaches per year requiring
notification of 232,000 consumers. In
2016, based on available data from the
years 2010 through 2014, staff arrived at
new estimates, projecting an average of
two breaches per year affecting a total of
40,000 individual consumers.
The Rule has now been in effect for
over ten years, and new data regarding
the number and scale of reported
breaches from 2017 through 2021 allow
staff to update its burden estimates. A
review of the breach reports received by
the FTC from 2010 through 2021 reveals
that there are two primary categories of
breaches reported: (1) ‘‘single-person
breaches,’’ incidents in which a single
individual’s information is potentially
compromised; and (2) what are hereafter
described as ‘‘major breaches,’’ in which
multiple—and typically, many—
individuals are affected. These two
categories of breaches are addressed
separately in this analysis because the
frequency and costs of the categories
differ significantly.
Nearly all of the submissions received
between 2010 and 2021—over 99% of
them—reported single-person breaches
related to an individual’s loss of control
over his or her login credentials. The
rate of such breaches has fluctuated
significantly since the Rule went into
effect. Whereas from 2011 to 2014 the
average annual number of single-person
breaches was 7,502, from 2014 to 2017
the average was almost 15,000. From
2018 to 2021, the rate dropped
significantly to 2,500. Assuming that
this rate continues, staff estimates that
between 2022 and 2025 the agency will
receive, on average, about 2,500 singleperson breach reports per year.
By contrast, major breach reports are
quite infrequent. On average, the FTC
receives one major breach report
approximately every two and a half
years, with an average of approximately
200,000 persons affected. Given the low
frequency at which major breaches
occur, FTC staff are unable to identify
any meaningful trends in the frequency
of major breach reports. FTC staff has
not identified any existing research
allowing us to make specific projections
about future variation in the frequency
of major breaches. Consequently, FTC
staff has assumed that the average
frequency and scale of major breaches
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10794
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2022 / Notices
will remain more or less static. Staff’s
calculations are based on the estimate
that a major breach will occur
approximately every two and a half
years and that 200,000 people will be
affected by each major breach, for an
annual average of 80,000 individuals
affected per year.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
4,654.
As explained in more detail within
the next section, FTC staff projects that
the employee time required for each
single-person breach is quite minimal
because the processes for notifying
consumers are largely automated and
single-person breaches can be reported
to the FTC in an aggregate annual
notification using the FTC’s two-page
form. On average, staff estimates that
covered firms will require
approximately 20 seconds of employee
labor per single-person breach. With an
estimated 2,500 single-person breaches
per year, the total estimated burden
hours for single-person breaches is
approximately 14 hours.
For each major breach, covered firms
will require on average 100 hours of
employee labor to determine what
information has been breached, identify
affected customers, prepare the breach
notice, and submit the required report to
the Commission. Based on staff’s
estimate that one major breach occurs
every two and a half years, the average
annual burden of major breaches
amounts to 40 hours per year.
Additionally, covered firms will incur
labor costs associated with processing
calls they may receive in the event of a
major breach. The Rule requires that
covered firms that fail to contact 10 or
more consumers because of insufficient
or out-of-date contact information must
provide substitute notice through either
a clear and conspicuous posting on their
website or media notice. Such substitute
notice must include a toll-free number
for the purpose of allowing a consumer
to learn whether or not his/her
information was affected by the breach.
Individuals contacted directly will
have already received this information.
Staff estimates that no more than 10
percent of affected consumers will
utilize the offered toll-free number.
Thus, of the 200,000 consumers affected
by a major breach, staff estimates that
20,000 may call the companies over the
90 days they are required to provide
such access. Staff additionally projects
that 10,000 additional consumers who
are not affected by the breach will also
call the companies during this period.
Staff estimates that processing all 30,000
calls will require an average of 11,500
hours of employee labor resulting in an
average annual burden of 4,600 labor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
hours. Given the low frequency of major
breaches, the annual average
requirement for major breaches is 4,640
hours.
The combined annual hours burden
for both single-person and major
breaches therefore is 4,654 (4,640 + 14).
Estimated Annual Labor Costs:
$90,741.
For each single-person breach, FTC
staff estimates that the average 20
seconds of employee labor to provide
(likely automated) notification to
affected individuals and produce an
annual breach notification for
submission to the FTC will cost
approximately $0.27 per breach. With
an estimated 2,500 single-person
breaches per year, the annual labor costs
associated with all single-person
breaches come to $675.
For major breaches, FTC staff projects
that the average 100 hours of employee
labor costs (excluding outside forensic
services, discussed below as estimated
non-labor costs) to determine what
information has been breached, identify
the affected customers, prepare the
breach notice, and report to the
Commission will cost an average of
$66.66 per hour for a total of $6,666.2
Based on an estimated one breach every
two and a half years, the annual
employee labor cost burden for affected
entities to perform these tasks is $2,666.
Additionally, staff expects covered
firms will require, for each major
breach, 11,500 hours of labor associated
with answering consumer telephone
calls at a cost of $218,500.3 Since a
major breach occurs approximately
every two and a half years, the average
annual burden of 4,600 labor hours
results in annualized labor cost of
approximately $87,400.
Accordingly, estimated cumulative
annual labor costs, excluding outside
forensic services, for both single-person
and major breaches, is $90,741 ($87,400
+ $2,666 + $675).
Estimated Annual Capital and Other
Non-Labor Costs: $31,056.
Commission staff estimates that
capital and other non-labor costs
2 Hourly wages throughout this document are
based on mean hourly wages found at https://
www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.htm
(‘‘Occupational Employment and Wages—May
2020,’’ U.S. Department of Labor, released March
2021, Table 1 (‘‘National employment and wage
data from the Occupational Employment Statistics
survey by occupation, May 2020’’).
The breakdown of labor hours and costs is as
follows: 50 hours of computer and information
systems managerial time at approximately $78 per
hour; 12 hours of marketing manager time at $74
per hour; 33 hours of computer programmer time
at $46 per hour; and 5 hours of legal staff time at
$72 per hour.
3 The cost of telephone operators is estimated at
$19/hour.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
associated with single-person breaches
will be negligible. Companies generally
use automated notification systems to
notify consumers of single-person
breaches. Automated notifications are
typically delivered by email or other
electronic methods. The costs of
providing such electronic notifications
are minimal.
Commission staff anticipates that
capital and other non-labor costs
associated with major breaches will
consist of the following:
1. Services of a forensic expert in
investigating the breach;
2. notification of consumers via email,
mail, web posting, or media; and
3. the cost of setting up a toll-free
number, if needed.
Staff estimates that, for each major
breach, covered firms will require 240
hours of a forensic expert’s time, at a
cumulative cost of $37,440 for each
breach. This estimate is based on a
projection that an average major breach
will affect approximately 20 machines
and that a forensic analyst will require
about 12 hours per machine to conduct
his or her analysis. The projected cost
of retaining the forensic analyst consists
of the hourly wages of an information
security analyst ($52), tripled to reflect
profits and overhead for an outside
consultant ($156), and multiplied by
240 hours. Based on the estimate that
there will be one major breach every
two and a half years, the annual cost
associated with the services of an
outside forensic expert is $14,976.
As explained above, staff estimates
that an average of 200,000 consumers
will be entitled to notification of each
major breach. Given the online
relationship between consumers and
vendors of personal health records and
PHR related entities, most notifications
will be made by email and the cost of
such notifications will be minimal.
In some cases, however, vendors of
personal health records and PHR related
entities will need to notify individuals
by postal mail, either because these
individuals have asked for such
notification, or because the email
addresses of these individuals are not
current or not working. Staff estimates
that the cost of a mailed notice is $0.11
for the paper and envelope, and $0.58
for a first class stamp. Assuming that
vendors of personal health records and
PHR related entities will need to notify
by postal mail 10 percent of the 200,000
customers whose information is
breached, the estimated cost of this
notification will be $13,800 per breach.
The annual cost will be around $5,520.
In addition, vendors of personal
health records and PHR related entities
may need to notify consumers by
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2022 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
posting a message on their home page,
or by providing media notice. Staff
estimates the cost of providing notice
via website posting to be $0.08 per
breached record, and the cost of
providing notice via published media to
be $0.04 per breached record. Applied
to the above-stated estimate of 200,000
affected consumers, the estimated total
cost of website notice will be $16,000,
and the estimated total cost of media
notice will be $8,000, yielding an
estimated total per-breach cost for both
forms of notice to consumers of $24,000.
Annualized, this number is
approximately $9,600 per year.
Finally, staff estimates that the cost of
providing a toll-free number will
depend on the costs associated with T1
lines sufficient to handle the projected
call volume and the cost of obtaining a
toll-free telephone number. Based on
industry research, staff projects that
affected entities may need two T1 lines
at a cost of $1,800 for the 90-day period.
In addition, staff estimates the cost of
obtaining a dedicated toll-free line to be
$100 per month. Accordingly, staff
projects that the cost of obtaining two
toll-free lines for 90 days will be $2,400.
The total annualized cost for providing
a toll-free number will be $960.
In sum, the total annual estimate for
non-labor costs associated with major
breaches is $31,056: $14,976 (services of
a forensic expert) + $5,520 (cost of mail
notifications) + $9,600 (cost of website
and media notice) + $960 (cost of
providing a toll-free number). Negligible
non-labor costs are associated with
single-person breaches.
The total estimated PRA annual cost
burden is $90,741 for labor costs and
$31,056 for non-labor costs, totaling
approximately $121,797.
Request for Comments
Pursuant to Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, the FTC invites comments on:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of maintaining records and
providing disclosures to consumers. All
comments must be received on or before
April 26, 2022.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the FTC to consider your
comment, we must receive it on or
before April 26, 2022. Write ‘‘Health
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
Breach Notification Rule; PRA
Comment: FTC File No. P072108’’ on
your comment. Your comment—
including your name and your state—
will be placed on the public record of
this proceeding, including the https://
www.regulations.gov website.
Due to the public health emergency in
response to the COVID–19 outbreak and
the agency’s heightened security
screening, postal mail addressed to the
Commission will be subject to delay. We
encourage you to submit your comments
online through the https://
www.regulations.gov website.
If you prefer to file your comment on
paper, write ‘‘Health Breach Notification
Rule; PRA Comment: FTC File No.
P072108’’ on your comment and on the
envelope, and mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite
CC–5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC
20580; or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex J),
Washington, DC 20024. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Because your comment will become
publicly available at https://
www.regulations.gov, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your
comment does not include any sensitive
or confidential information. In
particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal
information, such as your or anyone
else’s Social Security number; date of
birth; driver’s license number or other
state identification number, or foreign
country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or
debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your
comment does not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical
records or other individually
identifiable health information. In
addition, your comment should not
include any ‘‘trade secret or any
commercial or financial information
which . . . . is privileged or
confidential’’—as provided by Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)—
including in particular competitively
sensitive information such as costs,
sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
Comments containing material for
which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form,
must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential,’’
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10795
and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c).
In particular, the written request for
confidential treatment that accompanies
the comment must include the factual
and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public
record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your
comment will be kept confidential only
if the General Counsel grants your
request in accordance with the law and
the public interest. Once your comment
has been posted publicly at
www.regulations.gov, we cannot redact
or remove your comment unless you
submit a confidentiality request that
meets the requirements for such
treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and
the General Counsel grants that request.
The FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding, as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before April 26, 2022. For information
on the Commission’s privacy policy,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/
site-information/privacy-policy.
Josephine Liu,
Assistant General Counsel for Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2022–03958 Filed 2–24–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 3090–0112; Docket No.
2021–0001; Sequence No. 13]
Submission for OMB Review; Federal
Management Regulation; State Agency
Monthly Donation Report of Surplus
Property, GSA Form 3040
Federal Acquisition Service,
General Services Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding a renewal to an
existing OMB clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat Division will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of a
previously approved information
collection requirement regarding State
Agency Monthly Donation Report of
Surplus Property, GSA Form 3040.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
March 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for this information
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10792-10795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03958]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission) is seeking public
comment on its proposal to extend for an additional three years the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) clearance for information
collection requirements contained in the rules and regulations under
the Health Breach Notification Rule (or Rule). That clearance expires
on June 30, 2022.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 26, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper by
following the instructions in the Request for Comments part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``Health Breach
Notification Rule; PRA Comment: FTC File No. P072108'' on your comment,
and file your comment online at https://www.regulations.gov by
following the instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file
your comment on paper, mail your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver
your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office
of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor,
Suite 5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Mehm, Attorney, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, (202) 326-2918, Federal Trade Commission, 600
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Health Breach Notification Rule.
OMB Control Number: 3084-0150.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Abstract: The Health Breach Notification Rule (Rule), 16 CFR part
318, requires vendors of personal health records (PHR) and PHR related
entities to provide notice to: (1) Consumers whose unsecured personally
identifiable health information has been reached; (2) the Commission;
and (3) in some cases, the media. The Rule only applies to electronic
health records and does not include recordkeeping requirements. The
Rule requires third party service providers (e.g., those companies that
provide services such as billing or data storage) to vendors of
personal health records and PHR related entities to provide
notification to such vendors and PHR related entities following the
discovery of a breach. To notify the FTC of a breach, the Commission
developed a simple, two-page form, which is posted at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/rules/health-breach-notification-rule/health_breach_form.pdf
Likely Respondents: Vendors of personal health records, PHR related
entities and third party service providers.
[[Page 10793]]
Estimated Annual Hours Burden: 4,654.
Estimated Frequency: 2,500 single-person breaches per year and 0.33
major breaches per year.
Total Annual Labor Cost: $90,741.
Total Annual Capital or Other Non-Labor Cost: $31,056.
As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A), the FTC is providing this opportunity for public comment
before requesting that OMB extend the existing clearance for the
information collection requirements contained in the Commission's
Health Breach Notification Rule.
Burden Estimates
Brief Description of the Need for and Proposed Use of the Information
The Health Breach Notification Rule (Rule), 16 CFR part 318 (OMB
Control Number 3084-0150), requires vendors of personal health records
and PHR related entities to provide notice to: (1) Consumers whose
unsecured personally identifiable health information has been breached;
(2) the Commission; and (3) in some cases, the media.\1\ Under the
Rule, consumers whose unsecured, individually identifiable health
information has been breached must receive notice ``without
unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days'' after
discovery of the breach. Among other information, the notices must
provide consumers with steps they can take to protect themselves from
potential harm resulting from the breach. To notify the FTC of a
breach, the Commission developed a simple, two-page form, which is
posted at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/rules/health-breach-notification-rule/health_breach_form.pdf. For breaches involving
the health information of 500 or more individuals, entities must notify
the Commission as soon as possible, and in any event no later than ten
business days after discovering the breach. Entities may report all
breaches involving the information of fewer than 500 individuals in an
annual submission covering the prior calendar year. The Commission uses
entities' notifications to compile a list of breaches affecting 500 or
more individuals that is publicly available on the FTC's website. The
list provides businesses with information about potential sources of
data breaches, which is helpful to those developing data security
procedures. It also provides the public with information about the
extent of data breaches.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On September 15, 2021, the Commission, in light of changes
in the marketplace, issued a Policy Statement that clarified that
the Rule applies to most health apps and similar technologies that
are not covered by the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (``HIPAA''). Statement of the Commission on
Breaches by Health Apps and Other Connected Devices, Fed. Trade
Comm'n (Sept. 15, 2021), available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1596364/statement_of_the_commission_on_breaches_by_health_apps_and_other_connected_devices.pdf (``Policy Statement'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rule also requires third party service providers (e.g., those
companies that provide services such as billing or data storage) to
vendors of personal health records and PHR related entities to provide
notification to such vendors and PHR related entities following the
discovery of a breach.
The Rule only applies to electronic health records and does not
include recordkeeping requirements.
As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A), the FTC is providing this opportunity for public comment
before requesting that OMB extend the existing clearance for the
information collection requirements contained in the Rule.
Burden Estimates
The PRA burden of the Rule's requirements depends on a variety of
factors, including the number of covered firms; the percentage of such
firms that will experience a breach requiring further investigation
and, if necessary, the sending of breach notices; and the number of
consumers notified. The annual hours and cost estimates below likely
overstate the burden because, among other things, they assume, though
it is not necessarily so, that all covered firms experiencing breaches
subject to the Rule's notification requirements will be required to
take all of the steps described below.
The analysis may also overstate the burden of the Rule's
requirements because it assumes that covered firms would not take any
of the steps described were it not for the requirements of the Rule.
For example, the analysis incorporates labor costs associated with
understanding what information has been breached. It seems likely that
some firms would incur such costs even in the absence of the Rule's
requirements because the firms are independently interested in
identifying, understanding, and remediating security risks. A company
that investigates, for its own purposes, what information has been
breached is unlikely to fully duplicate the costs of that investigation
in complying with the Rule. Therefore, it may not be correct in all
cases that complying with the Rule results in added labor costs for
this activity. Nevertheless, in order to allow for a complete
understanding of all the potential costs associated with compliance,
these costs are included in this analysis.
At the time the Rule was issued in 2009, insufficient data was
available about the incidence of breaches in the PHR industry.
Accordingly, staff based its burden estimate on data pertaining to
private sector breaches across multiple industries. Staff estimated
that there would be 11 breaches per year requiring notification of
232,000 consumers. In 2016, based on available data from the years 2010
through 2014, staff arrived at new estimates, projecting an average of
two breaches per year affecting a total of 40,000 individual consumers.
The Rule has now been in effect for over ten years, and new data
regarding the number and scale of reported breaches from 2017 through
2021 allow staff to update its burden estimates. A review of the breach
reports received by the FTC from 2010 through 2021 reveals that there
are two primary categories of breaches reported: (1) ``single-person
breaches,'' incidents in which a single individual's information is
potentially compromised; and (2) what are hereafter described as
``major breaches,'' in which multiple--and typically, many--individuals
are affected. These two categories of breaches are addressed separately
in this analysis because the frequency and costs of the categories
differ significantly.
Nearly all of the submissions received between 2010 and 2021--over
99% of them--reported single-person breaches related to an individual's
loss of control over his or her login credentials. The rate of such
breaches has fluctuated significantly since the Rule went into effect.
Whereas from 2011 to 2014 the average annual number of single-person
breaches was 7,502, from 2014 to 2017 the average was almost 15,000.
From 2018 to 2021, the rate dropped significantly to 2,500. Assuming
that this rate continues, staff estimates that between 2022 and 2025
the agency will receive, on average, about 2,500 single-person breach
reports per year.
By contrast, major breach reports are quite infrequent. On average,
the FTC receives one major breach report approximately every two and a
half years, with an average of approximately 200,000 persons affected.
Given the low frequency at which major breaches occur, FTC staff are
unable to identify any meaningful trends in the frequency of major
breach reports. FTC staff has not identified any existing research
allowing us to make specific projections about future variation in the
frequency of major breaches. Consequently, FTC staff has assumed that
the average frequency and scale of major breaches
[[Page 10794]]
will remain more or less static. Staff's calculations are based on the
estimate that a major breach will occur approximately every two and a
half years and that 200,000 people will be affected by each major
breach, for an annual average of 80,000 individuals affected per year.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 4,654.
As explained in more detail within the next section, FTC staff
projects that the employee time required for each single-person breach
is quite minimal because the processes for notifying consumers are
largely automated and single-person breaches can be reported to the FTC
in an aggregate annual notification using the FTC's two-page form. On
average, staff estimates that covered firms will require approximately
20 seconds of employee labor per single-person breach. With an
estimated 2,500 single-person breaches per year, the total estimated
burden hours for single-person breaches is approximately 14 hours.
For each major breach, covered firms will require on average 100
hours of employee labor to determine what information has been
breached, identify affected customers, prepare the breach notice, and
submit the required report to the Commission. Based on staff's estimate
that one major breach occurs every two and a half years, the average
annual burden of major breaches amounts to 40 hours per year.
Additionally, covered firms will incur labor costs associated with
processing calls they may receive in the event of a major breach. The
Rule requires that covered firms that fail to contact 10 or more
consumers because of insufficient or out-of-date contact information
must provide substitute notice through either a clear and conspicuous
posting on their website or media notice. Such substitute notice must
include a toll-free number for the purpose of allowing a consumer to
learn whether or not his/her information was affected by the breach.
Individuals contacted directly will have already received this
information. Staff estimates that no more than 10 percent of affected
consumers will utilize the offered toll-free number. Thus, of the
200,000 consumers affected by a major breach, staff estimates that
20,000 may call the companies over the 90 days they are required to
provide such access. Staff additionally projects that 10,000 additional
consumers who are not affected by the breach will also call the
companies during this period. Staff estimates that processing all
30,000 calls will require an average of 11,500 hours of employee labor
resulting in an average annual burden of 4,600 labor hours. Given the
low frequency of major breaches, the annual average requirement for
major breaches is 4,640 hours.
The combined annual hours burden for both single-person and major
breaches therefore is 4,654 (4,640 + 14).
Estimated Annual Labor Costs: $90,741.
For each single-person breach, FTC staff estimates that the average
20 seconds of employee labor to provide (likely automated) notification
to affected individuals and produce an annual breach notification for
submission to the FTC will cost approximately $0.27 per breach. With an
estimated 2,500 single-person breaches per year, the annual labor costs
associated with all single-person breaches come to $675.
For major breaches, FTC staff projects that the average 100 hours
of employee labor costs (excluding outside forensic services, discussed
below as estimated non-labor costs) to determine what information has
been breached, identify the affected customers, prepare the breach
notice, and report to the Commission will cost an average of $66.66 per
hour for a total of $6,666.\2\ Based on an estimated one breach every
two and a half years, the annual employee labor cost burden for
affected entities to perform these tasks is $2,666.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Hourly wages throughout this document are based on mean
hourly wages found at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.htm
(``Occupational Employment and Wages--May 2020,'' U.S. Department of
Labor, released March 2021, Table 1 (``National employment and wage
data from the Occupational Employment Statistics survey by
occupation, May 2020'').
The breakdown of labor hours and costs is as follows: 50 hours
of computer and information systems managerial time at approximately
$78 per hour; 12 hours of marketing manager time at $74 per hour; 33
hours of computer programmer time at $46 per hour; and 5 hours of
legal staff time at $72 per hour.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, staff expects covered firms will require, for each
major breach, 11,500 hours of labor associated with answering consumer
telephone calls at a cost of $218,500.\3\ Since a major breach occurs
approximately every two and a half years, the average annual burden of
4,600 labor hours results in annualized labor cost of approximately
$87,400.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The cost of telephone operators is estimated at $19/hour.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, estimated cumulative annual labor costs, excluding
outside forensic services, for both single-person and major breaches,
is $90,741 ($87,400 + $2,666 + $675).
Estimated Annual Capital and Other Non-Labor Costs: $31,056.
Commission staff estimates that capital and other non-labor costs
associated with single-person breaches will be negligible. Companies
generally use automated notification systems to notify consumers of
single-person breaches. Automated notifications are typically delivered
by email or other electronic methods. The costs of providing such
electronic notifications are minimal.
Commission staff anticipates that capital and other non-labor costs
associated with major breaches will consist of the following:
1. Services of a forensic expert in investigating the breach;
2. notification of consumers via email, mail, web posting, or
media; and
3. the cost of setting up a toll-free number, if needed.
Staff estimates that, for each major breach, covered firms will
require 240 hours of a forensic expert's time, at a cumulative cost of
$37,440 for each breach. This estimate is based on a projection that an
average major breach will affect approximately 20 machines and that a
forensic analyst will require about 12 hours per machine to conduct his
or her analysis. The projected cost of retaining the forensic analyst
consists of the hourly wages of an information security analyst ($52),
tripled to reflect profits and overhead for an outside consultant
($156), and multiplied by 240 hours. Based on the estimate that there
will be one major breach every two and a half years, the annual cost
associated with the services of an outside forensic expert is $14,976.
As explained above, staff estimates that an average of 200,000
consumers will be entitled to notification of each major breach. Given
the online relationship between consumers and vendors of personal
health records and PHR related entities, most notifications will be
made by email and the cost of such notifications will be minimal.
In some cases, however, vendors of personal health records and PHR
related entities will need to notify individuals by postal mail, either
because these individuals have asked for such notification, or because
the email addresses of these individuals are not current or not
working. Staff estimates that the cost of a mailed notice is $0.11 for
the paper and envelope, and $0.58 for a first class stamp. Assuming
that vendors of personal health records and PHR related entities will
need to notify by postal mail 10 percent of the 200,000 customers whose
information is breached, the estimated cost of this notification will
be $13,800 per breach. The annual cost will be around $5,520.
In addition, vendors of personal health records and PHR related
entities may need to notify consumers by
[[Page 10795]]
posting a message on their home page, or by providing media notice.
Staff estimates the cost of providing notice via website posting to be
$0.08 per breached record, and the cost of providing notice via
published media to be $0.04 per breached record. Applied to the above-
stated estimate of 200,000 affected consumers, the estimated total cost
of website notice will be $16,000, and the estimated total cost of
media notice will be $8,000, yielding an estimated total per-breach
cost for both forms of notice to consumers of $24,000. Annualized, this
number is approximately $9,600 per year.
Finally, staff estimates that the cost of providing a toll-free
number will depend on the costs associated with T1 lines sufficient to
handle the projected call volume and the cost of obtaining a toll-free
telephone number. Based on industry research, staff projects that
affected entities may need two T1 lines at a cost of $1,800 for the 90-
day period. In addition, staff estimates the cost of obtaining a
dedicated toll-free line to be $100 per month. Accordingly, staff
projects that the cost of obtaining two toll-free lines for 90 days
will be $2,400. The total annualized cost for providing a toll-free
number will be $960.
In sum, the total annual estimate for non-labor costs associated
with major breaches is $31,056: $14,976 (services of a forensic expert)
+ $5,520 (cost of mail notifications) + $9,600 (cost of website and
media notice) + $960 (cost of providing a toll-free number). Negligible
non-labor costs are associated with single-person breaches.
The total estimated PRA annual cost burden is $90,741 for labor
costs and $31,056 for non-labor costs, totaling approximately $121,797.
Request for Comments
Pursuant to Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the FTC invites
comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize
the burden of maintaining records and providing disclosures to
consumers. All comments must be received on or before April 26, 2022.
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the FTC to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or before April 26, 2022. Write
``Health Breach Notification Rule; PRA Comment: FTC File No. P072108''
on your comment. Your comment--including your name and your state--will
be placed on the public record of this proceeding, including the
https://www.regulations.gov website.
Due to the public health emergency in response to the COVID-19
outbreak and the agency's heightened security screening, postal mail
addressed to the Commission will be subject to delay. We encourage you
to submit your comments online through the https://www.regulations.gov
website.
If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ``Health Breach
Notification Rule; PRA Comment: FTC File No. P072108'' on your comment
and on the envelope, and mail your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC 20580; or deliver
your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office
of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor,
Suite 5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC 20024. If possible, submit your
paper comment to the Commission by courier or overnight service.
Because your comment will become publicly available at https://www.regulations.gov, you are solely responsible for making sure that
your comment does not include any sensitive or confidential
information. In particular, your comment should not include any
sensitive personal information, such as your or anyone else's Social
Security number; date of birth; driver's license number or other state
identification number, or foreign country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or debit card number. You are also
solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include
any sensitive health information, such as medical records or other
individually identifiable health information. In addition, your comment
should not include any ``trade secret or any commercial or financial
information which . . . . is privileged or confidential''--as provided
by Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule
4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including in particular competitively
sensitive information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories,
formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled
``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c). In particular,
the written request for confidential treatment that accompanies the
comment must include the factual and legal basis for the request, and
must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the General Counsel grants your request in
accordance with the law and the public interest. Once your comment has
been posted publicly at www.regulations.gov, we cannot redact or remove
your comment unless you submit a confidentiality request that meets the
requirements for such treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General
Counsel grants that request.
The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission administers permit
the collection of public comments to consider and use in this
proceeding, as appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and
responsive public comments that it receives on or before April 26,
2022. For information on the Commission's privacy policy, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.
Josephine Liu,
Assistant General Counsel for Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2022-03958 Filed 2-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P