Proposed Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement, Endangered Species Act Claims, 10363-10364 [2022-03927]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2022 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OGC–2021–0674; FRL–9566–01–
OGC]
Proposed Stipulated Partial Settlement
Agreement, Endangered Species Act
Claims
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed stipulated
settlement agreement; request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator’s October 16, 2017,
Directive Promoting Transparency and
Public Participation in Consent Decrees
and Settlement Agreements, notice is
hereby given of a second proposed
stipulated partial settlement agreement
that resolves the Center for
Environmental Health, et al., v.
Wheeler, et al., case in the United States
District Court for the Northern District
of California (4:18–cv–03197) that
alleges that EPA and the United States
Fish and Wildlife (FWS) failed to
comply with certain procedural and
substantive duties under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Defendant-Intervenor joins this
proposed stipulated partial settlement
agreement.
SUMMARY:
Written comments on the
proposed stipulated partial settlement
agreement must be received by March
28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OGC–2021–0674, online at https://
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method). Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID number for
this action. Comments received may be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Additional Information about
Commenting on the Proposed
Settlement Agreement’’ heading under
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document. Out of an abundance
of caution for members of the public
and our staff, the EPA Docket Center
and Reading Room are closed to the
public, with limited exceptions, to
reduce the risk of transmitting COVID–
19. Our Docket Center staff will
continue to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Feb 23, 2022
Jkt 256001
We encourage the public to submit
comments via https://
www.regulations.gov, as there may be a
delay in processing mail and faxes.
Hand-deliveries and couriers may be
received by scheduled appointment
only. For further information on EPA
Docket Center services and the current
status, please visit us online at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
EPA continues to carefully and
continuously monitor information from
the CDC, local area health departments,
and our federal partners so that we can
respond rapidly as conditions change
regarding COVID–19.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michele Knorr, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances Law Office MC–2333A,
Office of General Counsel, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460; telephone (202) 564–5631; email
address knorr.michele@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining a Copy of the Proposed
Settlement Agreement
The official public docket for this
action (identified by Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OGC–2021–0674) contains a
copy of the proposed settlement
agreement.
The electronic version of the public
docket for this action contains a copy of
the proposed settlement agreement and
is available through https://
www.regulations.gov. You may use
https://www.regulations.gov to submit
or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search.’’
II. Additional Information About the
Proposed Settlement Agreement
Prior to this lawsuit being filed, on
January 18, 2017, EPA submitted to
FWS a nationwide biological evaluation
regarding the effects of malathion and
two other pesticide active ingredients
on species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA, 16 U.S.C.
Section 1531 et seq., and their
designated critical habitats and
requested initiation of consultation
pursuant to ESA Section 7(a)(2), 16
U.S.C. Section 1536(a)(2) (the Malathion
Consultation). The Malathion
Consultation has been ongoing since
that date.
Plaintiffs filed their original case in
May 2018, and amended the complaint
on July 25, 2018, and on November 27,
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10363
2018, alleging that: (1) EPA violated its
procedural duty under ESA Section
7(a)(2) to complete consultation and its
substantive duty under ESA Section
7(a)(2) to avoid jeopardy with respect to
21 malathion-containing pesticide
product registrations under the Federal
Insecticide Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA), and the FWS violated its
procedural duty to complete
consultation under ESA Section 7(a)(2);
(2) these failures constitute unlawfully
withheld or unreasonably delayed
agency action in violation of Section
706(1) of the Administrative Procedure
Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 706(1); and (3)
EPA failed to comply with ESA Section
7(d) when it ‘‘maintained the
registrations of these same pesticide
products and continued to reregister
and register pesticide products
containing malathion.’’
On January 4, 2022, the court entered
the first stipulated partial settlement
agreement that resolved part of this
case. Specifically, unless one of the
contingencies set forth in settlement
agreement occurs (which may result in
an extension of time), FWS will issue its
Final Biological Opinion and conclude
the Malathion Consultation no later
than February 28, 2022.
The remaining part of this case
involves the substantive claims under
ESA section 7(a)(2) against EPA. This
second proposed partial settlement
agreement states that, unless one of the
contingencies set forth in settlement
agreement occurs (which may result in
an extension of time), EPA will
implement specific portions of the Final
Biological Opinion no later than 18
months from the date that FWS issues
the Final Biological Opinion.
Implementation will include, but is not
limited to, providing to all registrants of
products containing malathion written
notice of the issuance of the Final
Biological Opinion no later than 60
calendar days from its issuance, as well
as notice of any actions the malathion
registrants must take (including to
require submission of requests to amend
labeling or terms and conditions of
registration).
Court approval of this proposed
stipulated partial settlement agreement
would result in the dismissal with
prejudice of the remaining claims.
Defendant-Intervenor joins this
proposed settlement agreement.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will accept written
comments relating to the proposed
stipulated partial settlement agreement
from persons who are not named as
parties to the litigation in question. EPA
or the Department of Justice may
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
10364
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
withdraw or withhold consent to the
proposed stipulated partial settlement
agreement if the comments disclose
facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the ESA or
FIFRA. Unless EPA or the Department
of Justice determines that consent
should be withdrawn, the terms of the
proposed stipulation and stipulated
notice of dismissal will be affirmed.
III. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed
Settlement Agreement
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OGC–2021–
0674, via https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from this docket.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit to
EPA’s docket at https://
www.regulations.gov any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. For additional information
about submitting information identified
as CBI, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document. Note
that written comments containing CBI
and submitted by mail may be delayed
and deliveries or couriers will be
received by scheduled appointment
only.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment. This ensures
that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Feb 23, 2022
Jkt 256001
is placed in the official public docket
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the https://
www.regulations.gov website to submit
comments to EPA electronically is
EPA’s preferred method for receiving
comments. The electronic public docket
system is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity, email address, or
other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
Christopher E. Kaczmarek,
Acting Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2022–03927 Filed 2–23–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK
[Public Notice: 2022–3003]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
Export-Import Bank of the
United States.
ACTION: Submission for OMB review and
comments request.
AGENCY:
The Export-Import Bank of
the United States (EXIM), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
Agencies to comment on the proposed
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Government-wide policy requires all
Federal employees to be vaccinated
against COVID–19, with exceptions only
as required by law. Employees may seek
a legal exception to the vaccination
requirement due to a disability, using
the reasonable accommodation Form.
The agency may also ask for other
information, as needed. Requests for
‘‘medical accommodation’’ or ‘‘medical
exceptions’’ will be treated as requests
for a disability accommodation and
evaluated and decided under applicable
Rehabilitation Act standards for
reasonable accommodation absent
undue hardship to the agency.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 28, 2022 to be assured
of consideration.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments may be
submitted electronically on
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB 21–03)
or by email to Nakia.Burton@exim.gov,
or by mail to Nakia Burton, ExportImport Bank, 811 Vermont Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20571. The information
collection tool can be reviewed at:
eib21–03.pdf (exim.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information, please
Nakia Burton nakia.burton@exim.gov,
202–565–3225.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title and Form Number: EIB 21–03
REQUEST FOR A MEDICAL
EXCEPTION TO THE COVID–19
VACCINATION REQUIREMENT.
OMB Number: 3048–xxxx.
Type of Review: Regular.
Need and Use: The information
collected will allow EXIM to determine
compliance and content for transaction
requests submitted to the Export-Import
Bank under its insurance, guarantee,
and direct loan programs.
A Notice Regarding Injunctions: The
vaccination requirement issued
pursuant to E.O. 14043, is currently the
subject of a nationwide injunction.
While that injunction remains in place,
EXIM will not process requests for a
medical exception from the COVID–19
vaccination requirement pursuant to
E.O. 14043. EXIM will also not request
the submission of any medical
information related to a request for an
exception from the vaccination
requirement pursuant to E.O. 14043
while the injunction remains in place.
But EXIM may nevertheless receive
information regarding a medical
exception. That is because, if EXIM
were to receive a request for an
exception from the COVID–19
vaccination requirement pursuant to
E.O. 14043 during the pendency of the
injunction, EXIM will accept the
request, hold it in abeyance, and notify
the employee who submitted the request
that implementation and enforcement of
the COVID–19 vaccination requirement
pursuant to E.O. 14043 is currently
enjoined and that an exception therefore
is not necessary so long as the
injunction is in place. In other words,
during the pendency of the injunction,
any information collection related to
requests for medical exception from the
COVID–19 vaccination requirement
pursuant to E.O. 14043 is not
undertaken to implement or enforce the
COVID–19 vaccination requirement.
Affected Public: This form affects
EXIM employees.
Annual Number of Respondents: 12.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 2
hours.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10363-10364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03927]
[[Page 10363]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OGC-2021-0674; FRL-9566-01-OGC]
Proposed Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement, Endangered
Species Act Claims
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed stipulated settlement agreement; request for
public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator's October 16, 2017, Directive Promoting Transparency and
Public Participation in Consent Decrees and Settlement Agreements,
notice is hereby given of a second proposed stipulated partial
settlement agreement that resolves the Center for Environmental Health,
et al., v. Wheeler, et al., case in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California (4:18-cv-03197) that alleges
that EPA and the United States Fish and Wildlife (FWS) failed to comply
with certain procedural and substantive duties under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). Defendant-Intervenor joins this proposed stipulated
partial settlement agreement.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed stipulated partial settlement
agreement must be received by March 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OGC-2021-0674, online at https://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred
method). Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
number for this action. Comments received may be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Additional Information
about Commenting on the Proposed Settlement Agreement'' heading under
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Out of an
abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA
Docket Center and Reading Room are closed to the public, with limited
exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19. Our Docket
Center staff will continue to provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. We encourage the public to submit comments
via https://www.regulations.gov, as there may be a delay in processing
mail and faxes. Hand-deliveries and couriers may be received by
scheduled appointment only. For further information on EPA Docket
Center services and the current status, please visit us online at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the CDC, local area health departments, and our federal partners
so that we can respond rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID-19.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Knorr, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances Law Office MC-2333A, Office of General Counsel, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone (202) 564-5631; email address
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining a Copy of the Proposed Settlement Agreement
The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2021-0674) contains a copy of the proposed settlement
agreement.
The electronic version of the public docket for this action
contains a copy of the proposed settlement agreement and is available
through https://www.regulations.gov. You may use https://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official public docket, and access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, key in the appropriate docket identification number then
select ``search.''
II. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement
Prior to this lawsuit being filed, on January 18, 2017, EPA
submitted to FWS a nationwide biological evaluation regarding the
effects of malathion and two other pesticide active ingredients on
species listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA, 16 U.S.C.
Section 1531 et seq., and their designated critical habitats and
requested initiation of consultation pursuant to ESA Section 7(a)(2),
16 U.S.C. Section 1536(a)(2) (the Malathion Consultation). The
Malathion Consultation has been ongoing since that date.
Plaintiffs filed their original case in May 2018, and amended the
complaint on July 25, 2018, and on November 27, 2018, alleging that:
(1) EPA violated its procedural duty under ESA Section 7(a)(2) to
complete consultation and its substantive duty under ESA Section
7(a)(2) to avoid jeopardy with respect to 21 malathion-containing
pesticide product registrations under the Federal Insecticide
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), and the FWS violated its
procedural duty to complete consultation under ESA Section 7(a)(2); (2)
these failures constitute unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed
agency action in violation of Section 706(1) of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 706(1); and (3) EPA failed to comply
with ESA Section 7(d) when it ``maintained the registrations of these
same pesticide products and continued to reregister and register
pesticide products containing malathion.''
On January 4, 2022, the court entered the first stipulated partial
settlement agreement that resolved part of this case. Specifically,
unless one of the contingencies set forth in settlement agreement
occurs (which may result in an extension of time), FWS will issue its
Final Biological Opinion and conclude the Malathion Consultation no
later than February 28, 2022.
The remaining part of this case involves the substantive claims
under ESA section 7(a)(2) against EPA. This second proposed partial
settlement agreement states that, unless one of the contingencies set
forth in settlement agreement occurs (which may result in an extension
of time), EPA will implement specific portions of the Final Biological
Opinion no later than 18 months from the date that FWS issues the Final
Biological Opinion. Implementation will include, but is not limited to,
providing to all registrants of products containing malathion written
notice of the issuance of the Final Biological Opinion no later than 60
calendar days from its issuance, as well as notice of any actions the
malathion registrants must take (including to require submission of
requests to amend labeling or terms and conditions of registration).
Court approval of this proposed stipulated partial settlement
agreement would result in the dismissal with prejudice of the remaining
claims. Defendant-Intervenor joins this proposed settlement agreement.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the
proposed stipulated partial settlement agreement from persons who are
not named as parties to the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may
[[Page 10364]]
withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed stipulated partial
settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations
that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate,
or inconsistent with the requirements of the ESA or FIFRA. Unless EPA
or the Department of Justice determines that consent should be
withdrawn, the terms of the proposed stipulation and stipulated notice
of dismissal will be affirmed.
III. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement
Agreement
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2021-
0674, via https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from this docket. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit to EPA's docket at https://www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. For additional information about submitting information
identified as CBI, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Note that written
comments containing CBI and submitted by mail may be delayed and
deliveries or couriers will be received by scheduled appointment only.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment. This ensures that you
can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to
contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your
comment. Any identifying or contact information provided in the body of
a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the
official public docket and made available in EPA's electronic public
docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment.
Use of the https://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments
to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
Christopher E. Kaczmarek,
Acting Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2022-03927 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P