Implementing the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); Updates Following the Eighteenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP18) to CITES, 10073-10080 [2022-03533]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
penalty per violation was increased to
$576.
These annual adjustments to the
penalty are calculated pursuant to the
inflation adjustment formula provided
in section 5(b) of the 2015 Act. In
accordance with section 6 of the 2015
Act, the adjusted penalty will apply
only to penalties assessed after the
effective date of the adjustment.
Generally, the periodic inflation
adjustment to a civil monetary penalty
under the 2015 Act will be based on the
percentage change between the
Consumer Price Index for all Urban
Consumers (CPI–U) for the month of
October preceding the date of
adjustment and the prior year’s October
CPI–U.
II. Calculation
The adjustment set forth in this final
rule was calculated by comparing the
CPI–U for October 2020 with the CPI–
U for October 2021, resulting in an
inflation adjustment factor of 1.06222.
The first step of the calculation is to
multiply the inflation adjustment factor
(1.06222) by the most recent civil
penalty amount ($576) to calculate the
inflation-adjusted penalty level
($611.83872). The second step is to
round this inflation-adjusted penalty to
the nearest dollar ($612). Accordingly,
the Commission is now adjusting the
maximum penalty per violation
specified in 29 CFR 1601.30(a) from
$576 to $612.
III. Regulatory Procedures
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) provides an exception to the
notice and comment procedures where
an agency finds good cause for
dispensing with such procedures, on the
basis that they are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. The Commission finds that
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) good cause
exists to not utilize notice of proposed
rulemaking and public comment
procedures for this rule because this
adjustment of the civil monetary penalty
is required by the 2015 Act, the formula
for calculating the adjustment to the
penalty is prescribed by statute, and the
Commission has no discretion in
determining the amount of the
published adjustment. Accordingly, the
Commission is issuing this revised
regulation as a final rule without notice
and comment.
Executive Order 12866
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866,
the EEOC has coordinated with the
Office of Management and Budget
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
(OMB). Under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, the EEOC and OMB have
determined that this final rule will not
have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or
tribal governments or communities. In
FY 2021, the Commission had 10
posting notice charge resolutions. The
great majority of employers and entities
covered by these regulations comply
with the posting requirement, and, as a
result, the aggregate economic impact of
these revised regulations will be
minimal, affecting only those limited
few who fail to post required notices in
violation of the regulation and statue.
10073
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to the effective date of the
rule. Under the CRA, a major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by the CRA at 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1601
Administrative practice and
procedure.
Charlotte A. Burrows,
Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission.
Accordingly, the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission amends 29
CFR part 1601 as follows:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35) (PRA) applies to
rulemakings in which an agency creates
a new paperwork burden on regulated
entities or modifies an existing burden.
This final rule contains no new
information collection requirements,
and therefore, will create no new
paperwork burdens or modifications to
existing burdens that are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget under the PRA.
PART 1601—PROCEDURAL
REGULATIONS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612) only requires a
regulatory flexibility analysis when
notice and comment is required by the
Administrative Procedure Act or some
other statute. As stated above, notice
and comment is not required for this
rule. For that reason, the requirements
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act do not
apply.
*
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (CRA)
requires that before a rule may take
effect, the agency promulgating the rule
must submit a rule report, which
includes a copy of the rule, to each
House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. EEOC will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 1601
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e–17; 42
U.S.C. 12111 to 12117; 42 U.S.C. 2000ff to
2000ff–11; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note, as amended;
Pub. L. 104–134, Sec. 31001(s)(1), 110 Stat.
1373.
2. Section 1601.30 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 1601.30
Notices to be posted.
*
*
*
*
(b) Section 711(b) of Title VII and the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act, as amended, make
failure to comply with this section
punishable by a fine of not more than
$612 for each separate offense.
[FR Doc. 2022–03697 Filed 2–22–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–IA–2020–0019;
FF09A30000–190FXIA16710900000]
RIN 1018–BF14
Implementing the Convention on
International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES); Updates Following the
Eighteenth Meeting of the Conference
of the Parties (CoP18) to CITES
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS or Service), are
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
10074
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
taking direct final action to revise
regulations that implement the
Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora (CITES or Treaty or Convention)
by incorporating certain noncontroversial provisions adopted at the
sixteenth through eighteenth meetings
of the Conference of the Parties (CoP16–
CoP18) to CITES and clarifying and
updating certain other provisions. These
changes will bring U.S. regulations in
line with certain revisions adopted at
the three most recent meetings of the
Conference of the Parties, which took
place in March 2013 (CoP16),
September–October 2016 (CoP17), and
August 2019 (CoP18). The revised
regulations will help us more effectively
promote species conservation, help us
continue to fulfill our responsibilities
under the Treaty, and help those
affected by CITES to understand how to
conduct lawful international trade.
DATES: This rule is effective May 24,
2022 without further action, unless we
receive significant adverse comment
that provides strong justifications as to
why this rule should not be adopted or
why it should be changed by March 25,
2022. The incorporation by reference of
the material listed in this rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of May 24, 2022. If we
receive significant adverse information
that provides strong justifications
regarding why this rule should not be
adopted or why it should be changed,
we will publish a timely withdrawal of
the rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect, in whole or in part.
ADDRESSES:
Comment submission: You may
submit comments regarding this direct
final rule by one of the following
methods:
• Electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket No.
FWS–HQ–IA–2020–0019 (the docket
number for this rulemaking).
• U.S. mail: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–HQ–IA–2020–
0019; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Headquarters, MS: JAO/3W, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803.
We will not accept email or faxes.
Comments and materials we receive, as
well as supporting documentation, will
be available for public inspection on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Supplementary materials: For the
CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of live wild animals and
plants incorporated by reference (IBR)
in this rule, contact CITES Secretariat,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
Palais des Nations, Avenue de la Paix 8–
14, 1211 Gene`ve 10, Switzerland;
telephone +41–(0)22–917–81–39/40;
email info@cites.org. You may find this
CITES IBR material on the CITES
Secretariat’s website at https://
www.cites.org/eng/resources/transport/
index.php and on our website at https://
www.fws.gov/international/travel-andtrade/live-animal-transport.html. For
the International Air Transport
Association Live Animals Regulations
and the International Air Transport
Association Perishable Cargo
Regulations incorporated by reference,
contact IATA, 800 Place Victoria, P.O.
Box 113, Montreal, Canada H4Z 1M1;
telephone 1–800–716–6326. Interested
persons may purchase a copy of the IBR
IATA publications at: https://
www.iata.org/publications. To view this
IBR material at the Division of
Management Authority office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), please
email us regarding the current status of
our office facility at:
managementauthority@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela Hall Scruggs, Chief, Division of
Management Authority, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike,
MS: IA, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803;
telephone 703–358–2095 or email:
managementauthority@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
CITES was negotiated in 1973 in
Washington, DC, at a conference
attended by delegations from 80
countries. The United States ratified the
Treaty on September 13, 1973, and it
entered into force on July 1, 1975, after
it had been ratified by 10 countries.
Currently, 182 countries and the
European Union (EU) have ratified,
accepted, approved, or acceded to
CITES; these countries and the EU (a
regional economic integration
organization) are known as Parties. On
January 4, 2022, Andorra will become
the 184th Party to CITES. The
Convention is an international treaty
designed to control and regulate
international trade in certain animal and
plant species that are now or may
become threatened with extinction and
may be affected by trade. These species
are listed in Appendices to CITES,
which are available on the CITES
Secretariat’s website at https://
www.cites.org/eng/app/index.php. The
Convention calls for regular biennial
meetings of the Conference of the
Parties (CoP), unless the Conference of
the Parties decides otherwise. At these
meetings, the Parties review the
implementation of CITES, make
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
provisions enabling the CITES
Secretariat in Switzerland to carry out
its functions, consider amendments to
the lists of species in Appendices I and
II, consider reports presented by the
Secretariat and the permanent CITES
committees (Standing, Animals, and
Plants Committees), and make
recommendations for the improved
effectiveness of CITES. Any country that
is a Party to CITES may propose
amendments to Appendices I and II,
resolutions, decisions, and other agenda
items for consideration by all of the
Parties at the meetings.
Section 8A of the Endangered Species
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
(ESA), designates the Secretary of the
Interior as the U.S. Management
Authority and U.S. Scientific Authority
for CITES. Section 8A further states that
the respective functions of these
authorities shall be carried out through
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
II. Previous Federal Actions
The original U.S. regulations
implementing CITES took effect on May
23, 1977 (42 FR 10462, February 22,
1977), after the first CoP was held. We
have since updated the regulations
several times. U.S. CITES regulations
were most recently updated in May
2014 (79 FR 30400, May 27, 2014) and
contain applicable provisions adopted
at meetings of the Conference of the
Parties up to and including the fifteenth
meeting (CoP15), which took place in
2010.
III. This Rule
As a Party to CITES, the United States
has the responsibility under Article II(4)
of the Treaty to ensure that all trade is
consistent with the Treaty. To ensure
that U.S. businesses and individuals
understand the requirements for lawful
international trade in CITES specimens,
it is necessary for us to periodically
update our CITES implementing
regulations. With this direct final rule
we are incorporating minor,
noncontroversial updates to our
regulations to reflect certain technical
changes adopted by the CITES Parties
during the sixteenth through eighteenth
meetings of the Conference of the
Parties to CITES (CoP16–CoP18) and
clarifying and updating other
provisions. The revisions in this direct
final rule bring U.S. regulations in line
with certain revisions adopted at these
meetings of the Conference of the
Parties, which took place in March 2013
(CoP16), September–October 2016
(CoP17), and August 2019 (CoP18). The
revised regulations will help us more
effectively promote species
conservation, help us continue to fulfill
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
V. Changes to 50 CFR Part 23
our responsibilities under the Treaty,
and help those affected by CITES
understand how to conduct lawful
international trade.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
IV. Use of a Direct Final Rule
An agency uses direct final
rulemaking without prior proposal
when it anticipates that a rule will be
noncontroversial. Examples include
minor substantive revisions to
regulations and direct incorporations of
mandates from new legislation. We are
publishing this rule without a prior
proposal because these changes are
noncontroversial actions that, in the
best interest of the regulated public,
should be undertaken in as timely a
manner as possible. The Parties agreed
by consensus that these changes are
appropriate for the conservation of the
species and implementation of the
Treaty. As previously noted, as a Party
to CITES, the United States has the
responsibility under Article II(4) of the
Treaty to ensure that all trade is
consistent with the Treaty, which
includes aligning import, introduction
from the sea, export, and re-export
provisions as agreed by the Parties.
Thus, we have good cause to find that
standard notice and public comment
procedures would be unnecessary and
contrary to the public interest.
The rule will be effective, as
published in this document, on the
effective date specified above in DATES,
unless we receive significant adverse
comments on or before the comment
due date specified in DATES. Significant
adverse comments are comments that
provide strong justifications as to why
the rule should not be adopted or why
it should be changed. If we receive
significant adverse comments, we will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
withdrawing this rule before the
effective date. Please note that if we
receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may withdraw only that provision,
and otherwise adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the
subject of an adverse comment.
In the event that we do receive
significant adverse comments, we will
engage in the normal rulemaking
process to promulgate changes to 50
CFR part 23 as necessary. In addition, to
address other necessary changes to our
regulations as a result of the last three
CoPs that are more complex than the
provisions in this rulemaking
document, we will soon publish a
proposed rule for public comment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
Section 23.5 How are the terms used in
these regulations defined?
Whenever possible we define terms
using the wording of the Treaty and the
Resolutions. In this direct final rule, we
are amending § 23.5 to include a
definition of the term ‘‘assisted
production.’’ We are making this
amendment together with our
amendment of § 23.24 to add a new
source code ‘‘Y’’ for assisted production
plants. (See the preamble discussion for
§ 23.24.)
The new term ‘‘assisted production’’
was developed and adopted by the
Parties for use with certain plant
specimens that do not fall within the
definition of ‘‘artificially propagated’’
and are not considered to be ‘‘wild’’
because they are propagated or planted
in an environment with some level of
human intervention for the purpose of
plant production. The term is the result
of extensive, substantive discussions at
the direction of the Conference of the
Parties that resulted in
recommendations by the Plants
Committee (PC24; Geneva, 2018) and
the Standing Committee (SC70; Sochi,
2018), to amend Resolution Conf. 12.3,
Permits and certificates, and Resolution
Conf. 11.11, Regulation of trade in
plants, to add the concept and
definition of ‘‘assisted production’’ and
its associated new source code ‘‘Y’’ for
use on CITES documents. The United
States was a member of the Plants
Committee’s intersessional and insession working groups on this topic
and the in-session Standing Committee
working group at SC70. The
recommendations were developed as a
result of the recognized need for an
intermediate source code for
international trade in plant specimens.
These recommended changes to
Resolution Conf. 12.3 and Resolution
Conf. 11.11, to establish an intermediate
source code for international trade in
plant specimens that do not qualify as
‘‘artificially propagated’’ according to
CITES but are also not wild specimens,
were adopted by the Parties at CoP18
with support from the United States.
Under the newly revised Resolution
Conf. 11.11 (Rev. CoP18), ‘‘assisted
production’’ means plant specimens
that do not fulfill the definition of
‘‘artificially propagated’’ and are
considered not to be ‘‘wild’’ because
they are propagated or planted in an
environment with some level of human
intervention for the purpose of plant
production. We are implementing this
definition with nonsubstantive changes
for clarity and for consistency with
language in our current regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10075
Material used to produce plant
specimens from assisted production
systems can be derived from plant
material that is exempt from the
provisions of the Convention, or derived
from artificially propagated plants, or
derived from plants grown in an
environment with some level of human
intervention, or derived from plant
materials collected sustainably from
wild populations in accordance with the
provisions of CITES and relevant
national laws and in a manner not
detrimental to the survival of the
species in the wild. Trade in assisted
production plants (source code Y) will
continue to require compliance with the
provisions of Articles III, IV, and V of
the Convention, the same as for trade in
wild plants (source code W).
The Parties envisioned that Source
Code Y could be used as an
intermediate source code under a
number of different scenarios to fill a
gap in the previously available source
codes. These scenarios include
situations in which: (1) Countries have
developed plant production systems
that clearly reduce pressure on wildsourced plant material, but this
development is not reflected if the
Source Code W is used; (2) using Source
Code W for plant material that comes
from managed production systems
reduces scientific accuracy and
misrepresents the trade data; and (3)
identifying the source of species
harvested outside their natural range
does not fit logically under Source Code
W or Source Code A (for artificially
propagated plants). As noted above, the
Parties also confirmed that the new
Source Code Y would continue to
require compliance with the provisions
of Articles III, IV, and V of the
Convention, including the making of
required non-detriment findings for
Appendix–I and Appendix–II
specimens and required legal
acquisition findings for Appendix–I,
Appendix–II, and Appendix–III
specimens; therefore, ensuring that
impact on the wild population and
possible conservation concerns would
be considered. The United States also
believes that Source Code Y could be
used in cases where the best available
information demonstrates that the
plants for export were not wild
harvested, but the applicant cannot
provide sufficient information to prove
that the plants were artificially
propagated, as is generally the case in a
household move of personal plants
purchased from a nursery or other
retailer.
We are therefore amending our
regulations to implement the new
definition of ‘‘assisted production’’
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
10076
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
adopted by the Parties together with our
amendment of § 23.24 to add a new
source code ‘‘Y’’ for assisted production
plants. (See the preamble discussion for
§ 23.24.) This action fulfills the needs
described above, as it will promote more
effective implementation of CITES for
plants, will more accurately reflect the
range of sources from which CITESlisted plants are derived, and will help
promote the conservation of CITESlisted plants.
Section 23.6 What are the roles of the
Management and Scientific Authorities?
In this direct final rule, we amend the
table in § 23.6, which lists the roles of
the U.S. Management and Scientific
Authorities, to reflect the revisions to
Resolution Conf. 11.17 (Rev. CoP18),
National reports, that were adopted at
CoP16. The revised Resolution includes
a new recommendation that the CITES
biennial report, required under Article
VIII, paragraph 7(b) of the Treaty, be
submitted 1 year before each meeting of
the Conference of the Parties, instead of
every 2 years, and that the name of the
report therefore be changed from
‘‘biennial report’’ to ‘‘report required
under the provisions of Article VIII,
paragraph 7(b).’’ We change ‘‘biennial
reports’’ in § 23.6(g) to ‘‘periodic Article
VIII, paragraph 7(b) reports’’ to reflect
this new recommendation. This
paragraph states that it is a role of the
U.S. Management Authority to produce
such reports.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Section 23.7 What office do I contact
for CITES information?
This section contains contact
information for offices involved in
CITES implementation in the United
States and for the CITES Secretariat. In
this direct final rule we update the
information in paragraph (f) regarding
guidelines currently available on the
Secretariat’s website for humane
transport of CITES specimens. (See the
preamble discussion for § 23.23.)
Section 23.9 Incorporation by
Reference
In this direct final rule, we are
finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. We
currently require that CITES export and
re-export documents for live specimens
contain a specific condition that the
document is valid only if the transport
complies with certain humane-transport
standards. At CoP14, the Parties agreed
to promote the full and effective use of
the International Air Transport
Association (IATA) Live Animals
Regulations (for animals) and Perishable
Cargo Regulations (for plants) as the
standards for the preparation and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
transport of live specimens. The IATA
Live Animals Regulations (LAR), 40th
edition, and Perishable Cargo
Regulations (PCR), 13th edition, are
incorporated by reference into our
regulations at § 23.9. With this direct
final rule, we update our regulations by
incorporating by reference the 48th
edition of the IATA LAR and the 21st
edition of the PCR to replace the 40th
and 13th editions, respectively, that are
incorporated by reference in our current
regulations.
At CoP16, the Parties adopted the
CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of wild animals and plants,
recognizing that the non-air transport of
live specimens of certain species may
require transport conditions in addition
to or different from those in the IATA
regulations (see the preamble discussion
for § 23.23). In this direct final rule we
incorporate by reference (in § 23.9) the
CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of live wild animals and
plants as the standard for the non-air
transport of certain CITES-listed
animals and plants.
In accordance with requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the CITES
guidelines for the non-air transport of
live wild animals and plants, the 48th
edition of the IATA Live Animals
Regulations (LAR), and the 21st edition
of the IATA Perishable Cargo
Regulations (PCR). The LAR establishes
regulations for air transportation of all
animals including CITES-listed species.
The IATA PCR establishes regulations
for air transportation of perishable,
including all plants and those species
that are CITES-listed. The CITES
guidelines for the non-air transport of
live wild animals and plants establishes
regulations for the non-air transport of
CITES-listed animals and plants for
those species that have methods
different than, or in addition to, the
methods prescribed by the LAR or PCR.
The regulations and standards provided
by these three references for the safe and
humane transport of all animals and
plants must be complied with for the
legal international transport of all
CITES-listed animals and plants. We
update the references to humane
transport requirements elsewhere in
part 23 (§§ 23.7, 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56)
to reflect these changes. Copies of the
materials incorporated by reference
normally may be inspected by
appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays, at: U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service Headquarters, Division
of Management Authority, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803; telephone 703–358–2095.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
However, the COVID–19 pandemic may
affect when these materials are available
for inspection. For information on the
availability to view this material at the
Division of Management Authority
office, please email us regarding the
current status of our office facility at:
managementauthority@fws.gov. You
may find the CITES IBR material on the
CITES Secretariat’s website at https://
www.cites.org/eng/resources/transport/
index.php and on our website at https://
www.fws.gov/international/travel-andtrade/live-animal-transport.html.
Interested persons may purchase a copy
of the IATA publications at: https://
www.iata.org/publications.
Section 23.23 What information is
required on U.S. and foreign CITES
documents?
This section details information that
must be included on CITES documents.
To authorize export and re-export of
living specimens, Articles III, IV, V, and
VII of the Convention require the
Management Authority to be satisfied
the living specimens will be so prepared
and shipped as to minimize the risk of
injury, damage to health, or cruel
treatment. Additionally, under Article
VIII of the Convention, Parties are
required to ensure that all living
specimens, during any period of transit,
holding, and shipment, are properly
cared for so as to minimize the risk of
injury, damage to health, or cruel
treatment. To meet these obligations, we
currently require that CITES export and
re-export documents for live specimens
contain a specific condition that the
document is valid only if the transport
complies with certain humane-transport
standards and require that shipments
containing live CITES specimens
comply with these standards. At CoP14,
the Parties agreed to promote the full
and effective use of the International Air
Transport Association (IATA) Live
Animals Regulations (LAR) (for animals)
and Perishable Cargo Regulations (PCR)
(for plants) as the standards for the
preparation and transport of live
specimens. These IATA documents are
incorporated by reference into our
regulations at § 23.9.
At CoP16, the Parties adopted the
CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of wild animals and plants.
These new guidelines were developed
by a joint Animals Committee/Plants
Committee working group (under
Decision 15.59) recognizing that the
non-air transport of live specimens of
certain species may require transport
conditions in addition to or different
from those in the IATA regulations. The
United States participated in the
working group and supported the
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
adoption of the guidelines at CoP16.
With this direct final rule we
incorporate by reference (in § 23.9) the
CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of live wild animals and
plants as the standard for the non-air
transport of certain CITES-listed
animals and plants. In addition, we
update our regulations by incorporating
by reference (in § 23.9) the 48th edition
of the IATA LAR and the 21st edition
of the IATA PCR to replace the 40th
edition of the LAR and the 13th edition
of the PCR that are incorporated by
reference in our current regulations. We
update the references to humane
transport requirements elsewhere in
part 23 (§§ 23.7, 23.26, and 23.56) to
reflect these changes.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 23.24 What code is used to show the
source of the specimen?
The Management Authority must
indicate on CITES documents the source
of the specimen being traded. The table
in § 23.24 contains source codes agreed
by the CITES Parties for use on CITES
documents. At CoP16, the Parties agreed
to a framework for application of the
provisions in Articles III and IV of the
Treaty for trade in specimens taken in
the marine environment not under the
jurisdiction of any country (Resolution
Conf. 14.6 (Rev. CoP16), Introduction
from the sea). At the same time, the
Parties agreed to the use of source code
‘‘X’’ on CITES documents issued for
such specimens, through the adoption
of changes to Resolution Conf. 12.3
(Rev. CoP18) on Permits and
certificates. With this direct final rule,
we are adding source code ‘‘X’’ to the
table in § 23.24 for specimens taken in
the marine environment not under the
jurisdiction of any country.
The Parties agreed, at CoP18, to adopt
revisions to Resolution Conf. 11.11 (Rev.
CoP18), Regulation of trade in plants,
including addition of the term ‘‘assisted
production’’ (see the discussion in the
preamble for § 23.5 regarding the
definition of ‘‘assisted production’’) and
to the use of source code ‘‘Y’’ on CITES
documents for such specimens, through
the adoption of changes to Resolution
Conf. 12.3 (Rev. CoP18) on Permits and
certificates. With this direct final rule,
we add this new source code to the table
in § 23.24 for assisted production plants.
§ 23.26 When is a U.S. or foreign
CITES document valid?
With this direct final rule, we update
the documents incorporated by
reference into our regulations at
§ 23.23(c)(7) that provide guidance on
humane transport of live specimens.
(See the preamble discussion for
§ 23.23.) We update the entry on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
humane transport in the table at § 23.26
to reflect these changes.
§ 23.56 What U.S. CITES document
conditions do I need to follow?
With this direct final rule, we update
the documents incorporated by
reference into our regulations at § 23.9
that provide guidance on humane
transport of live specimens. (See the
preamble discussions for §§ 23.9 and
23.23.) Therefore, we update the text at
§ 23.56(a)(2) regarding humanetransport conditions to reflect these
changes.
VI. Public Comments
We will not consider comments
regarding this direct final rule sent by
email or fax or to an address not listed
in ADDRESSES. If you submit a comment
via https://www.regulations.gov, your
entire comment, including any personal
identifying information, will be posted
on the website. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
VII. Required Determinations
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(1) Be logically organized;
(2) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(3) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(4) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(5) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. To
better help us revise the rule, your
comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell
us the numbers of the sections or
paragraphs that are unclearly written,
which sections or sentences are too
long, the sections where you feel lists or
tables would be useful, etc.
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
We have determined that
environmental assessments and
environmental impact statements, as
defined under the authority of the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10077
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), need not
be prepared in connection with this
rule. This rule does not constitute a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment. A detailed statement
under NEPA is not required because the
rule is covered by a categorical
exclusion. This rule is a regulation that
is of an administrative, legal, technical,
or procedural nature, and its
environmental effects are too broad,
speculative, or conjectural to lend
themselves to meaningful analysis
under NEPA. The FWS has determined
that this rule is categorically excluded
from further NEPA review as provided
by 516 DM 8 (Department of the Interior
Manual, Series 31, Part 516, Chapter 8:
Managing the NEPA Process—U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service) and 43 CFR
46.210(i). We have also determined that
the rule does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43
CFR 46.215 that would require further
analysis under NEPA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), whenever an agency is required
to publish a notice of rulemaking for
any proposed or final rule, it must
prepare and make available for public
comment a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effects of the
rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and
small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of the
agency certifies the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA; 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) amended
the RFA to require Federal agencies to
provide a certification statement of the
factual basis for certifying that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. According to the Small
Business Administration, small entities
include small organizations such as
independent nonprofit organizations;
small governmental jurisdictions,
including school boards and city and
town governments that serve fewer than
50,000 residents; and small businesses
(13 CFR 121.201). Small businesses
include manufacturing and mining
concerns with fewer than 500
employees, wholesale trade entities
with fewer than 100 employees, retail
and service businesses with less than $5
million in annual sales, general and
heavy construction businesses with less
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
10078
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
than $27.5 million in annual business,
special trade contractors doing less than
$11.5 million in annual business, and
agricultural businesses with annual
sales less than $750,000. We expect that
the majority of the entities involved
with international trade in CITES
specimens would be considered small
as defined by the SBA.
This rule would create no substantial
fee or paperwork changes in the
permitting process. The regulatory
changes are not major in scope and
would not change the modest financial
or paperwork burden on the affected
members of the general public currently
approved under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
This rule would benefit businesses
engaged in international trade by
providing updated and clearer
regulations for the international trade of
CITES specimens. We do not expect
these benefits to be significant under the
RFA. The authority to enforce CITES
requirements already exists under the
ESA and is carried out by regulations
contained in 50 CFR part 23. The
requirements that must be met for
import, introduction from the sea,
export, and re-export of CITES species
are based on the text of CITES, which
has been in effect in the United States
since 1975.
We therefore certify that this rule
would not have a significant economic
effect on a substantial number of small
entities as defined under the RFA, and
a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA) (5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.)
This rule is not a major rule under
SBREFA. This rule:
(a) Will not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
This rule provides the importing and
exporting community in the United
States with updated and more clearly
written regulations implementing
CITES. This rule will not have a
negative effect on this part of the
economy. It will affect import,
introduction from the sea, export, and
re-export of CITES specimens by any
person equally, and the benefits of
having updated guidance on complying
with CITES requirements will be evenly
spread among all businesses, whether
large or small. There is not a
disproportionate share of benefits for
small or large businesses.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers;
individual industries; Federal, State,
tribal, or local government agencies; or
geographic regions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
(c) Will not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This rule will assist U.S. businesses and
individuals traveling abroad in ensuring
that they are meeting all current CITES
requirements, thereby decreasing the
possibility that shipments may be
delayed or even seized in another
country that has implemented CITES
resolutions not yet incorporated into
U.S. regulations.
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994
(Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments; 59 FR 22951), Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments), and the Department of
the Interior’s manual at 512 DM 2
(Department of the Interior Manual,
Series 30, Part 512, Chapter 2:
Departmental Responsibilities for
Indian Trust Resources), we readily
acknowledge our responsibility to
communicate meaningfully with
recognized Federal Tribes on a
government-to-government basis. In
accordance with Secretarial Order 3206
of June 5, 1997 (American Indian Tribal
Rights, Federal-Tribal Trust
Responsibilities, and the Endangered
Species Act), we readily acknowledge
our responsibilities to work directly
with Tribes in developing programs for
healthy ecosystems, to acknowledge that
Tribal lands are not subject to the same
controls as Federal public lands, to
remain sensitive to Indian culture, and
to make information available to Tribes.
We have evaluated this rule under the
criteria in Executive Order 13175 under
the Department’s consultation policy
and have determined that it has no
substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian Tribes and that
consultation under the Department’s
Tribal consultation policy is not
required. Individual Tribal members
must meet the same regulatory
requirements as other individuals who
trade internationally in CITES species.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) will review all significant rules.
OMB has determined that this rule is
not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the Nation’s
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
Executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use—
Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use) requires agencies
to prepare statements of energy effects
when undertaking certain actions. This
rule revises the current regulations in 50
CFR part 23 that implement CITES. The
regulations provide procedures to assist
individuals and businesses that import,
introduce from the sea, export, and reexport CITES wildlife and plants, and
their parts, products, and derivatives, to
meet international requirements. This
rule does not significantly affect energy
supplies, distribution, and use.
Therefore, this action is not a significant
energy action, and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.), we make the following findings:
(1) This rule would not produce a
Federal mandate. In general, a Federal
mandate is a provision in legislation,
statute, or regulation that would impose
an enforceable duty upon State, local, or
Tribal governments, or the private
sector, and includes both Federal
intergovernmental mandates and
Federal private sector mandates. These
terms are defined in 2 U.S.C. 658(5)–(7).
‘‘Federal intergovernmental mandate’’
includes a regulation that would impose
an enforceable duty upon State, local, or
Tribal governments with two
exceptions. It excludes a condition of
Federal assistance. It also excludes a
duty arising from participation in a
voluntary Federal program, unless the
regulation relates to a then-existing
Federal program under which
$500,000,000 or more is provided
annually to State, local, and Tribal
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
governments under entitlement
authority, if the provision would
increase the stringency of conditions of
assistance or place caps upon, or
otherwise decrease, the Federal
Government’s responsibility to provide
funding, and the State, local, or Tribal
governments lack authority to adjust
accordingly. At the time of enactment,
these entitlement programs were:
Medicaid; Aid to Families with
Dependent Children work programs;
Child Nutrition; Food Stamps; Social
Services Block Grants; Vocational
Rehabilitation State Grants; Foster Care,
Adoption Assistance, and Independent
Living; Family Support Welfare
Services; and Child Support
Enforcement. ‘‘Federal private sector
mandate’’ includes a regulation that
‘‘would impose an enforceable duty
upon the private sector, except (i) a
condition of Federal assistance or (ii) a
duty arising from participation in a
voluntary Federal program.’’
(2) The rule does not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the
private sector. As the lead agency for
implementing CITES in the United
States, we are responsible for
monitoring international trade in CITES
wildlife and plants, including their
parts, products, and derivatives, and
issuing documents under CITES to
authorize international trade in CITES
wildlife and plants. The structure of the
program imposes no unfunded
mandates; this rule imposes no
obligations on State, local, or Tribal
governments. Therefore, a Small
Government Agency Plan is not
required.
federalism summary impact statement is
not required. These revisions to 50 CFR
part 23 do not contain significant
federalism implications.
Takings—Executive Order 12630
In accordance with E.O. 12630
(Government Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Private
Property Rights), we have analyzed the
potential takings implications of this
rule.
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630. The rule would not further
restrict the import, export, or re-export
of CITES specimens. Rather, this rule
updates and clarifies the regulations for
the import, export, and re-export of
CITES specimens, which will assist the
importing and exporting community in
conducting international trade in CITES
specimens. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Therefore, for the reasons discussed
in the preamble, we hereby amend part
23 of title 50, Code of Federal
Regulations, as set forth below.
Federalism—Executive Order 13132
In accordance with E.O. 13132
(federalism), this rule does not have
significant federalism effects. A
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
Civil Justice Reform—Executive Order
12988
In accordance with Executive Order
12988 (Civil Justice Reform), this rule
does not unduly burden the judicial
system and meets the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This rule does not contain any new
collections of information that require
approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 23
Animals, Endangered and threatened
species, Exports, Fish, Foreign trade,
Imports, Incorporation by reference,
Plants, Transportation, Treaties,
Wildlife.
Regulation Promulgation
PART 23—CONVENTION ON
INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN
ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD
FAUNA AND FLORA (CITES)
1. The authority citation for part 23
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna
and Flora (March 3, 1973), 27 U.S.T. 1087;
and Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
2. Amend § 23.5 by adding, in
alphabetical order, a definition of
‘‘assisted production’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 23.5 How are the terms used in these
regulations defined?
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00023
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
10079
Assisted production means a plant
specimen that does not fall within the
definition of ‘‘artificially propagated’’
and the source of the specimen is
considered not to be taken from the wild
because it was propagated or planted in
an environment with some level of
human intervention for the purpose of
plant production.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 23.6
[Amended]
3. Amend § 23.6 by removing the
word ‘‘biennial’’ in paragraph (g) and
adding in its place the words ‘‘periodic
Article VIII, paragraph 7(b)’’.
■
§ 23.7
[Amended]
4. Amend § 23.7(f)(2) by removing the
words ‘‘CITES’ Guidelines for transport
and preparation for shipment of live
wild animals and plants’’ and adding in
their place the words ‘‘CITES Guidelines
for the non-air transport of live wild
animals and plants’’.
■ 5. Revise § 23.9 to read as follows:
■
§ 23.9
Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. All approved material is
available for inspection at U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, International Affairs,
Division of Management Authority,
703–358–2104 and is available from the
sources listed elsewhere in this section.
It is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, email fr.inspection@
nara.gov or go to www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(a) International Air Transport
Association (IATA), 800 Place Victoria,
P.O. Box 113, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H4Z 1M1, 1–800–716–6326,
www.iata.org.
(1) Live Animals Regulations (LAR)
48th edition, effective January 1, 2022,
into §§ 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56.
(2) Perishable Cargo Regulations
(PCR) 21st edition, effective January 1,
2022, into §§ 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56.
(b) CITES Secretariat: Palais des
Nations, Avenue de la Paix 8–14, 1211
Gene`ve 10, Switzerland; telephone +41–
(0)22–917–81–39/40; email info@
cites.org, www.cites.org.
(1) CITES Guidelines for the non-air
transport of live wild animals and
plants, effective January 2, 2017, into
§§ 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56, available for
downloading at
(i) https://cites.org/eng/resources/
transport/index.php
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
10080
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) https://www.fws.gov/
international/travel-and-trade/liveanimal-transport.html
(2) [Reserved]
§ 23.23 What information is required on
U.S. and foreign CITES documents?
6. Amend § 23.23 by revising
paragraph (c)(7) to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
Required information
Description
*
*
(7) Humane transport of live
specimens.
*
*
*
*
*
If the CITES document authorizes the export or re-export of live specimens, a statement that the document
is valid only if the transport conditions comply with the International Air Transport Association Live Animals
Regulations (for animals) (incorporated by reference, see § 23.9) or the International Air Transport Association Perishable Cargo Regulations (for plants) (incorporated by reference, see § 23.9) or, in the case of
non-air transport of species that may require transport conditions in addition to or different from the Live
Animals Regulations or the Perishable Cargo Regulations, the CITES Guidelines for the non-air transport
of wild animals and plants (incorporated by reference, see § 23.9). A shipment containing live specimens
must comply with the International Air Transport Association Live Animals Regulations (for animals) or the
International Air Transport Association Perishable Cargo Regulations (for plants) or, in the case of non-air
transport of species that may require transport conditions in addition to or different from the Live Animals
Regulations or the Perishable Cargo Regulations, the CITES Guidelines for the non-air transport of wild
animals and plants.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7. Amend § 23.24 by adding
paragraphs (j) and (k) to read as follows:
■
*
*
§ 23.24 What code is used to show the
source of the specimen?
*
*
*
*
*
Source of specimen
Code
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Specimens taken in the marine environment not under the jurisdiction of any country (see § 23.39) ......................................................
(k) Assisted production plant (see § 23.5) ......................................................................................................................................................
X
Y
§ 23.26 When is a U.S. or foreign CITES
document valid?
8. Amend § 23.26 by revising
paragraph (c)(8) to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
Key phrase
Conditions for an acceptable CITES document
*
*
(8) Humane transport ..................
*
*
*
*
*
Live wildlife or plants were transported in compliance with the International Air Transport Association Live
Animals Regulations (for animals) (incorporated by reference, see § 23.9) or the International Air Transport
Association Perishable Cargo Regulations (for plants) (incorporated by reference, see § 23.9) or, in the
case of non-air transport of species that may require transport conditions in addition to or different from the
Live Animals Regulations or the Perishable Cargo Regulations, the CITES Guidelines for the non-air transport of live wild animals and plants (incorporated by reference, see § 23.9).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
9. Amend § 23.56 by revising
paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 23.56 What U.S. CITES document
conditions do I need to follow?
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
(a) * * *
(2) For export and re-export of live
wildlife and plants, transport conditions
must comply with the International Air
Transport Association Live Animals
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
*
*
Regulations (for animals) (incorporated
by reference, see § 23.9) or the
International Air Transport Association
Perishable Cargo Regulations (for
plants) (incorporated by reference, see
§ 23.9) or, in the case of non-air
transport of species that may require
transport conditions in addition to or
different from the Live Animals
Regulations or the Perishable Cargo
Regulations, the CITES Guidelines for
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
*
*
the non-air transport of live wild
animals and plants (incorporated by
reference, see § 23.9).
*
*
*
*
*
Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 2022–03533 Filed 2–22–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10073-10080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03533]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. FWS-HQ-IA-2020-0019; FF09A30000-190FXIA16710900000]
RIN 1018-BF14
Implementing the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); Updates Following the
Eighteenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP18) to CITES
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS or Service), are
[[Page 10074]]
taking direct final action to revise regulations that implement the
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna
and Flora (CITES or Treaty or Convention) by incorporating certain non-
controversial provisions adopted at the sixteenth through eighteenth
meetings of the Conference of the Parties (CoP16-CoP18) to CITES and
clarifying and updating certain other provisions. These changes will
bring U.S. regulations in line with certain revisions adopted at the
three most recent meetings of the Conference of the Parties, which took
place in March 2013 (CoP16), September-October 2016 (CoP17), and August
2019 (CoP18). The revised regulations will help us more effectively
promote species conservation, help us continue to fulfill our
responsibilities under the Treaty, and help those affected by CITES to
understand how to conduct lawful international trade.
DATES: This rule is effective May 24, 2022 without further action,
unless we receive significant adverse comment that provides strong
justifications as to why this rule should not be adopted or why it
should be changed by March 25, 2022. The incorporation by reference of
the material listed in this rule is approved by the Director of the
Federal Register as of May 24, 2022. If we receive significant adverse
information that provides strong justifications regarding why this rule
should not be adopted or why it should be changed, we will publish a
timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register informing the
public that the rule will not take effect, in whole or in part.
ADDRESSES:
Comment submission: You may submit comments regarding this direct
final rule by one of the following methods:
Electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FWS-HQ-IA-2020-0019 (the
docket number for this rulemaking).
U.S. mail: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-HQ-IA-
2020-0019; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters, MS: JAO/3W,
5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
We will not accept email or faxes. Comments and materials we
receive, as well as supporting documentation, will be available for
public inspection on https://www.regulations.gov.
Supplementary materials: For the CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of live wild animals and plants incorporated by reference
(IBR) in this rule, contact CITES Secretariat, Palais des Nations,
Avenue de la Paix 8-14, 1211 Gen[egrave]ve 10, Switzerland; telephone
+41-(0)22-917-81-39/40; email [email protected]. You may find this CITES
IBR material on the CITES Secretariat's website at https://www.cites.org/eng/resources/transport/index.php and on our website at
https://www.fws.gov/international/travel-and-trade/live-animal-transport.html. For the International Air Transport Association Live
Animals Regulations and the International Air Transport Association
Perishable Cargo Regulations incorporated by reference, contact IATA,
800 Place Victoria, P.O. Box 113, Montreal, Canada H4Z 1M1; telephone
1-800-716-6326. Interested persons may purchase a copy of the IBR IATA
publications at: https://www.iata.org/publications. To view this IBR
material at the Division of Management Authority office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), please email us regarding the current
status of our office facility at: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Hall Scruggs, Chief, Division
of Management Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg
Pike, MS: IA, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803; telephone 703-358-2095 or
email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
CITES was negotiated in 1973 in Washington, DC, at a conference
attended by delegations from 80 countries. The United States ratified
the Treaty on September 13, 1973, and it entered into force on July 1,
1975, after it had been ratified by 10 countries. Currently, 182
countries and the European Union (EU) have ratified, accepted,
approved, or acceded to CITES; these countries and the EU (a regional
economic integration organization) are known as Parties. On January 4,
2022, Andorra will become the 184th Party to CITES. The Convention is
an international treaty designed to control and regulate international
trade in certain animal and plant species that are now or may become
threatened with extinction and may be affected by trade. These species
are listed in Appendices to CITES, which are available on the CITES
Secretariat's website at https://www.cites.org/eng/app/index.php. The
Convention calls for regular biennial meetings of the Conference of the
Parties (CoP), unless the Conference of the Parties decides otherwise.
At these meetings, the Parties review the implementation of CITES, make
provisions enabling the CITES Secretariat in Switzerland to carry out
its functions, consider amendments to the lists of species in
Appendices I and II, consider reports presented by the Secretariat and
the permanent CITES committees (Standing, Animals, and Plants
Committees), and make recommendations for the improved effectiveness of
CITES. Any country that is a Party to CITES may propose amendments to
Appendices I and II, resolutions, decisions, and other agenda items for
consideration by all of the Parties at the meetings.
Section 8A of the Endangered Species Act, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) (ESA), designates the Secretary of the Interior as the
U.S. Management Authority and U.S. Scientific Authority for CITES.
Section 8A further states that the respective functions of these
authorities shall be carried out through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
II. Previous Federal Actions
The original U.S. regulations implementing CITES took effect on May
23, 1977 (42 FR 10462, February 22, 1977), after the first CoP was
held. We have since updated the regulations several times. U.S. CITES
regulations were most recently updated in May 2014 (79 FR 30400, May
27, 2014) and contain applicable provisions adopted at meetings of the
Conference of the Parties up to and including the fifteenth meeting
(CoP15), which took place in 2010.
III. This Rule
As a Party to CITES, the United States has the responsibility under
Article II(4) of the Treaty to ensure that all trade is consistent with
the Treaty. To ensure that U.S. businesses and individuals understand
the requirements for lawful international trade in CITES specimens, it
is necessary for us to periodically update our CITES implementing
regulations. With this direct final rule we are incorporating minor,
noncontroversial updates to our regulations to reflect certain
technical changes adopted by the CITES Parties during the sixteenth
through eighteenth meetings of the Conference of the Parties to CITES
(CoP16-CoP18) and clarifying and updating other provisions. The
revisions in this direct final rule bring U.S. regulations in line with
certain revisions adopted at these meetings of the Conference of the
Parties, which took place in March 2013 (CoP16), September-October 2016
(CoP17), and August 2019 (CoP18). The revised regulations will help us
more effectively promote species conservation, help us continue to
fulfill
[[Page 10075]]
our responsibilities under the Treaty, and help those affected by CITES
understand how to conduct lawful international trade.
IV. Use of a Direct Final Rule
An agency uses direct final rulemaking without prior proposal when
it anticipates that a rule will be noncontroversial. Examples include
minor substantive revisions to regulations and direct incorporations of
mandates from new legislation. We are publishing this rule without a
prior proposal because these changes are noncontroversial actions that,
in the best interest of the regulated public, should be undertaken in
as timely a manner as possible. The Parties agreed by consensus that
these changes are appropriate for the conservation of the species and
implementation of the Treaty. As previously noted, as a Party to CITES,
the United States has the responsibility under Article II(4) of the
Treaty to ensure that all trade is consistent with the Treaty, which
includes aligning import, introduction from the sea, export, and re-
export provisions as agreed by the Parties. Thus, we have good cause to
find that standard notice and public comment procedures would be
unnecessary and contrary to the public interest.
The rule will be effective, as published in this document, on the
effective date specified above in DATES, unless we receive significant
adverse comments on or before the comment due date specified in DATES.
Significant adverse comments are comments that provide strong
justifications as to why the rule should not be adopted or why it
should be changed. If we receive significant adverse comments, we will
publish a notice in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule before
the effective date. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on
an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision
may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may withdraw only
that provision, and otherwise adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
In the event that we do receive significant adverse comments, we
will engage in the normal rulemaking process to promulgate changes to
50 CFR part 23 as necessary. In addition, to address other necessary
changes to our regulations as a result of the last three CoPs that are
more complex than the provisions in this rulemaking document, we will
soon publish a proposed rule for public comment.
V. Changes to 50 CFR Part 23
Section 23.5 How are the terms used in these regulations defined?
Whenever possible we define terms using the wording of the Treaty
and the Resolutions. In this direct final rule, we are amending Sec.
23.5 to include a definition of the term ``assisted production.'' We
are making this amendment together with our amendment of Sec. 23.24 to
add a new source code ``Y'' for assisted production plants. (See the
preamble discussion for Sec. 23.24.)
The new term ``assisted production'' was developed and adopted by
the Parties for use with certain plant specimens that do not fall
within the definition of ``artificially propagated'' and are not
considered to be ``wild'' because they are propagated or planted in an
environment with some level of human intervention for the purpose of
plant production. The term is the result of extensive, substantive
discussions at the direction of the Conference of the Parties that
resulted in recommendations by the Plants Committee (PC24; Geneva,
2018) and the Standing Committee (SC70; Sochi, 2018), to amend
Resolution Conf. 12.3, Permits and certificates, and Resolution Conf.
11.11, Regulation of trade in plants, to add the concept and definition
of ``assisted production'' and its associated new source code ``Y'' for
use on CITES documents. The United States was a member of the Plants
Committee's intersessional and in-session working groups on this topic
and the in-session Standing Committee working group at SC70. The
recommendations were developed as a result of the recognized need for
an intermediate source code for international trade in plant specimens.
These recommended changes to Resolution Conf. 12.3 and Resolution Conf.
11.11, to establish an intermediate source code for international trade
in plant specimens that do not qualify as ``artificially propagated''
according to CITES but are also not wild specimens, were adopted by the
Parties at CoP18 with support from the United States.
Under the newly revised Resolution Conf. 11.11 (Rev. CoP18),
``assisted production'' means plant specimens that do not fulfill the
definition of ``artificially propagated'' and are considered not to be
``wild'' because they are propagated or planted in an environment with
some level of human intervention for the purpose of plant production.
We are implementing this definition with nonsubstantive changes for
clarity and for consistency with language in our current regulations.
Material used to produce plant specimens from assisted production
systems can be derived from plant material that is exempt from the
provisions of the Convention, or derived from artificially propagated
plants, or derived from plants grown in an environment with some level
of human intervention, or derived from plant materials collected
sustainably from wild populations in accordance with the provisions of
CITES and relevant national laws and in a manner not detrimental to the
survival of the species in the wild. Trade in assisted production
plants (source code Y) will continue to require compliance with the
provisions of Articles III, IV, and V of the Convention, the same as
for trade in wild plants (source code W).
The Parties envisioned that Source Code Y could be used as an
intermediate source code under a number of different scenarios to fill
a gap in the previously available source codes. These scenarios include
situations in which: (1) Countries have developed plant production
systems that clearly reduce pressure on wild-sourced plant material,
but this development is not reflected if the Source Code W is used; (2)
using Source Code W for plant material that comes from managed
production systems reduces scientific accuracy and misrepresents the
trade data; and (3) identifying the source of species harvested outside
their natural range does not fit logically under Source Code W or
Source Code A (for artificially propagated plants). As noted above, the
Parties also confirmed that the new Source Code Y would continue to
require compliance with the provisions of Articles III, IV, and V of
the Convention, including the making of required non-detriment findings
for Appendix-I and Appendix-II specimens and required legal acquisition
findings for Appendix-I, Appendix-II, and Appendix-III specimens;
therefore, ensuring that impact on the wild population and possible
conservation concerns would be considered. The United States also
believes that Source Code Y could be used in cases where the best
available information demonstrates that the plants for export were not
wild harvested, but the applicant cannot provide sufficient information
to prove that the plants were artificially propagated, as is generally
the case in a household move of personal plants purchased from a
nursery or other retailer.
We are therefore amending our regulations to implement the new
definition of ``assisted production''
[[Page 10076]]
adopted by the Parties together with our amendment of Sec. 23.24 to
add a new source code ``Y'' for assisted production plants. (See the
preamble discussion for Sec. 23.24.) This action fulfills the needs
described above, as it will promote more effective implementation of
CITES for plants, will more accurately reflect the range of sources
from which CITES-listed plants are derived, and will help promote the
conservation of CITES-listed plants.
Section 23.6 What are the roles of the Management and Scientific
Authorities?
In this direct final rule, we amend the table in Sec. 23.6, which
lists the roles of the U.S. Management and Scientific Authorities, to
reflect the revisions to Resolution Conf. 11.17 (Rev. CoP18), National
reports, that were adopted at CoP16. The revised Resolution includes a
new recommendation that the CITES biennial report, required under
Article VIII, paragraph 7(b) of the Treaty, be submitted 1 year before
each meeting of the Conference of the Parties, instead of every 2
years, and that the name of the report therefore be changed from
``biennial report'' to ``report required under the provisions of
Article VIII, paragraph 7(b).'' We change ``biennial reports'' in Sec.
23.6(g) to ``periodic Article VIII, paragraph 7(b) reports'' to reflect
this new recommendation. This paragraph states that it is a role of the
U.S. Management Authority to produce such reports.
Section 23.7 What office do I contact for CITES information?
This section contains contact information for offices involved in
CITES implementation in the United States and for the CITES
Secretariat. In this direct final rule we update the information in
paragraph (f) regarding guidelines currently available on the
Secretariat's website for humane transport of CITES specimens. (See the
preamble discussion for Sec. 23.23.)
Section 23.9 Incorporation by Reference
In this direct final rule, we are finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. We currently require that CITES
export and re-export documents for live specimens contain a specific
condition that the document is valid only if the transport complies
with certain humane-transport standards. At CoP14, the Parties agreed
to promote the full and effective use of the International Air
Transport Association (IATA) Live Animals Regulations (for animals) and
Perishable Cargo Regulations (for plants) as the standards for the
preparation and transport of live specimens. The IATA Live Animals
Regulations (LAR), 40th edition, and Perishable Cargo Regulations
(PCR), 13th edition, are incorporated by reference into our regulations
at Sec. 23.9. With this direct final rule, we update our regulations
by incorporating by reference the 48th edition of the IATA LAR and the
21st edition of the PCR to replace the 40th and 13th editions,
respectively, that are incorporated by reference in our current
regulations.
At CoP16, the Parties adopted the CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of wild animals and plants, recognizing that the non-air
transport of live specimens of certain species may require transport
conditions in addition to or different from those in the IATA
regulations (see the preamble discussion for Sec. 23.23). In this
direct final rule we incorporate by reference (in Sec. 23.9) the CITES
guidelines for the non-air transport of live wild animals and plants as
the standard for the non-air transport of certain CITES-listed animals
and plants.
In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are finalizing
the incorporation by reference of the CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of live wild animals and plants, the 48th edition of the IATA
Live Animals Regulations (LAR), and the 21st edition of the IATA
Perishable Cargo Regulations (PCR). The LAR establishes regulations for
air transportation of all animals including CITES-listed species. The
IATA PCR establishes regulations for air transportation of perishable,
including all plants and those species that are CITES-listed. The CITES
guidelines for the non-air transport of live wild animals and plants
establishes regulations for the non-air transport of CITES-listed
animals and plants for those species that have methods different than,
or in addition to, the methods prescribed by the LAR or PCR. The
regulations and standards provided by these three references for the
safe and humane transport of all animals and plants must be complied
with for the legal international transport of all CITES-listed animals
and plants. We update the references to humane transport requirements
elsewhere in part 23 (Sec. Sec. 23.7, 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56) to
reflect these changes. Copies of the materials incorporated by
reference normally may be inspected by appointment, between 8 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, at: U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service Headquarters, Division of Management Authority,
5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803; telephone 703-358-
2095. However, the COVID-19 pandemic may affect when these materials
are available for inspection. For information on the availability to
view this material at the Division of Management Authority office,
please email us regarding the current status of our office facility at:
[email protected]. You may find the CITES IBR material on the
CITES Secretariat's website at https://www.cites.org/eng/resources/transport/index.php and on our website at https://www.fws.gov/international/travel-and-trade/live-animal-transport.html. Interested
persons may purchase a copy of the IATA publications at: https://www.iata.org/publications.
Section 23.23 What information is required on U.S. and foreign CITES
documents?
This section details information that must be included on CITES
documents.
To authorize export and re-export of living specimens, Articles
III, IV, V, and VII of the Convention require the Management Authority
to be satisfied the living specimens will be so prepared and shipped as
to minimize the risk of injury, damage to health, or cruel treatment.
Additionally, under Article VIII of the Convention, Parties are
required to ensure that all living specimens, during any period of
transit, holding, and shipment, are properly cared for so as to
minimize the risk of injury, damage to health, or cruel treatment. To
meet these obligations, we currently require that CITES export and re-
export documents for live specimens contain a specific condition that
the document is valid only if the transport complies with certain
humane-transport standards and require that shipments containing live
CITES specimens comply with these standards. At CoP14, the Parties
agreed to promote the full and effective use of the International Air
Transport Association (IATA) Live Animals Regulations (LAR) (for
animals) and Perishable Cargo Regulations (PCR) (for plants) as the
standards for the preparation and transport of live specimens. These
IATA documents are incorporated by reference into our regulations at
Sec. 23.9.
At CoP16, the Parties adopted the CITES guidelines for the non-air
transport of wild animals and plants. These new guidelines were
developed by a joint Animals Committee/Plants Committee working group
(under Decision 15.59) recognizing that the non-air transport of live
specimens of certain species may require transport conditions in
addition to or different from those in the IATA regulations. The United
States participated in the working group and supported the
[[Page 10077]]
adoption of the guidelines at CoP16. With this direct final rule we
incorporate by reference (in Sec. 23.9) the CITES guidelines for the
non-air transport of live wild animals and plants as the standard for
the non-air transport of certain CITES-listed animals and plants. In
addition, we update our regulations by incorporating by reference (in
Sec. 23.9) the 48th edition of the IATA LAR and the 21st edition of
the IATA PCR to replace the 40th edition of the LAR and the 13th
edition of the PCR that are incorporated by reference in our current
regulations. We update the references to humane transport requirements
elsewhere in part 23 (Sec. Sec. 23.7, 23.26, and 23.56) to reflect
these changes.
Sec. 23.24 What code is used to show the source of the specimen?
The Management Authority must indicate on CITES documents the
source of the specimen being traded. The table in Sec. 23.24 contains
source codes agreed by the CITES Parties for use on CITES documents. At
CoP16, the Parties agreed to a framework for application of the
provisions in Articles III and IV of the Treaty for trade in specimens
taken in the marine environment not under the jurisdiction of any
country (Resolution Conf. 14.6 (Rev. CoP16), Introduction from the
sea). At the same time, the Parties agreed to the use of source code
``X'' on CITES documents issued for such specimens, through the
adoption of changes to Resolution Conf. 12.3 (Rev. CoP18) on Permits
and certificates. With this direct final rule, we are adding source
code ``X'' to the table in Sec. 23.24 for specimens taken in the
marine environment not under the jurisdiction of any country.
The Parties agreed, at CoP18, to adopt revisions to Resolution
Conf. 11.11 (Rev. CoP18), Regulation of trade in plants, including
addition of the term ``assisted production'' (see the discussion in the
preamble for Sec. 23.5 regarding the definition of ``assisted
production'') and to the use of source code ``Y'' on CITES documents
for such specimens, through the adoption of changes to Resolution Conf.
12.3 (Rev. CoP18) on Permits and certificates. With this direct final
rule, we add this new source code to the table in Sec. 23.24 for
assisted production plants.
Sec. 23.26 When is a U.S. or foreign CITES document valid?
With this direct final rule, we update the documents incorporated
by reference into our regulations at Sec. 23.23(c)(7) that provide
guidance on humane transport of live specimens. (See the preamble
discussion for Sec. 23.23.) We update the entry on humane transport in
the table at Sec. 23.26 to reflect these changes.
Sec. 23.56 What U.S. CITES document conditions do I need to follow?
With this direct final rule, we update the documents incorporated
by reference into our regulations at Sec. 23.9 that provide guidance
on humane transport of live specimens. (See the preamble discussions
for Sec. Sec. 23.9 and 23.23.) Therefore, we update the text at Sec.
23.56(a)(2) regarding humane-transport conditions to reflect these
changes.
VI. Public Comments
We will not consider comments regarding this direct final rule sent
by email or fax or to an address not listed in ADDRESSES. If you submit
a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire comment,
including any personal identifying information, will be posted on the
website. If you submit a hardcopy comment that includes personal
identifying information, you may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from public review. However, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all
hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov.
VII. Required Determinations
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(1) Be logically organized;
(2) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(3) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(4) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(5) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. To better help us
revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as possible. For
example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections or paragraphs
that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences are too long,
the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, etc.
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
We have determined that environmental assessments and environmental
impact statements, as defined under the authority of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), need not be
prepared in connection with this rule. This rule does not constitute a
major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment. A detailed statement under NEPA is not required because
the rule is covered by a categorical exclusion. This rule is a
regulation that is of an administrative, legal, technical, or
procedural nature, and its environmental effects are too broad,
speculative, or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis
under NEPA. The FWS has determined that this rule is categorically
excluded from further NEPA review as provided by 516 DM 8 (Department
of the Interior Manual, Series 31, Part 516, Chapter 8: Managing the
NEPA Process--U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) and 43 CFR 46.210(i). We
have also determined that the rule does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require
further analysis under NEPA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), whenever an agency is
required to publish a notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final
rule, it must prepare and make available for public comment a
regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effects of the rule
on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small organizations, and
small government jurisdictions). However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of the agency certifies the rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA; 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) amended the RFA to require Federal
agencies to provide a certification statement of the factual basis for
certifying that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. According to the Small Business
Administration, small entities include small organizations such as
independent nonprofit organizations; small governmental jurisdictions,
including school boards and city and town governments that serve fewer
than 50,000 residents; and small businesses (13 CFR 121.201). Small
businesses include manufacturing and mining concerns with fewer than
500 employees, wholesale trade entities with fewer than 100 employees,
retail and service businesses with less than $5 million in annual
sales, general and heavy construction businesses with less
[[Page 10078]]
than $27.5 million in annual business, special trade contractors doing
less than $11.5 million in annual business, and agricultural businesses
with annual sales less than $750,000. We expect that the majority of
the entities involved with international trade in CITES specimens would
be considered small as defined by the SBA.
This rule would create no substantial fee or paperwork changes in
the permitting process. The regulatory changes are not major in scope
and would not change the modest financial or paperwork burden on the
affected members of the general public currently approved under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
This rule would benefit businesses engaged in international trade
by providing updated and clearer regulations for the international
trade of CITES specimens. We do not expect these benefits to be
significant under the RFA. The authority to enforce CITES requirements
already exists under the ESA and is carried out by regulations
contained in 50 CFR part 23. The requirements that must be met for
import, introduction from the sea, export, and re-export of CITES
species are based on the text of CITES, which has been in effect in the
United States since 1975.
We therefore certify that this rule would not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities as defined
under the RFA, and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) (5 U.S.C.
801 et seq.)
This rule is not a major rule under SBREFA. This rule:
(a) Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. This rule provides the importing and exporting community in
the United States with updated and more clearly written regulations
implementing CITES. This rule will not have a negative effect on this
part of the economy. It will affect import, introduction from the sea,
export, and re-export of CITES specimens by any person equally, and the
benefits of having updated guidance on complying with CITES
requirements will be evenly spread among all businesses, whether large
or small. There is not a disproportionate share of benefits for small
or large businesses.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, tribal, or local
government agencies; or geographic regions.
(c) Will not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This
rule will assist U.S. businesses and individuals traveling abroad in
ensuring that they are meeting all current CITES requirements, thereby
decreasing the possibility that shipments may be delayed or even seized
in another country that has implemented CITES resolutions not yet
incorporated into U.S. regulations.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994
(Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments; 59 FR 22951), Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments), and the Department of the
Interior's manual at 512 DM 2 (Department of the Interior Manual,
Series 30, Part 512, Chapter 2: Departmental Responsibilities for
Indian Trust Resources), we readily acknowledge our responsibility to
communicate meaningfully with recognized Federal Tribes on a
government-to-government basis. In accordance with Secretarial Order
3206 of June 5, 1997 (American Indian Tribal Rights, Federal-Tribal
Trust Responsibilities, and the Endangered Species Act), we readily
acknowledge our responsibilities to work directly with Tribes in
developing programs for healthy ecosystems, to acknowledge that Tribal
lands are not subject to the same controls as Federal public lands, to
remain sensitive to Indian culture, and to make information available
to Tribes. We have evaluated this rule under the criteria in Executive
Order 13175 under the Department's consultation policy and have
determined that it has no substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian Tribes and that consultation under the Department's
Tribal consultation policy is not required. Individual Tribal members
must meet the same regulatory requirements as other individuals who
trade internationally in CITES species.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OMB has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The Executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use--Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211 (Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use) requires
agencies to prepare statements of energy effects when undertaking
certain actions. This rule revises the current regulations in 50 CFR
part 23 that implement CITES. The regulations provide procedures to
assist individuals and businesses that import, introduce from the sea,
export, and re-export CITES wildlife and plants, and their parts,
products, and derivatives, to meet international requirements. This
rule does not significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, and
use. Therefore, this action is not a significant energy action, and no
Statement of Energy Effects is required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq.), we make the following findings:
(1) This rule would not produce a Federal mandate. In general, a
Federal mandate is a provision in legislation, statute, or regulation
that would impose an enforceable duty upon State, local, or Tribal
governments, or the private sector, and includes both Federal
intergovernmental mandates and Federal private sector mandates. These
terms are defined in 2 U.S.C. 658(5)-(7).
``Federal intergovernmental mandate'' includes a regulation that
would impose an enforceable duty upon State, local, or Tribal
governments with two exceptions. It excludes a condition of Federal
assistance. It also excludes a duty arising from participation in a
voluntary Federal program, unless the regulation relates to a then-
existing Federal program under which $500,000,000 or more is provided
annually to State, local, and Tribal
[[Page 10079]]
governments under entitlement authority, if the provision would
increase the stringency of conditions of assistance or place caps upon,
or otherwise decrease, the Federal Government's responsibility to
provide funding, and the State, local, or Tribal governments lack
authority to adjust accordingly. At the time of enactment, these
entitlement programs were: Medicaid; Aid to Families with Dependent
Children work programs; Child Nutrition; Food Stamps; Social Services
Block Grants; Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants; Foster Care,
Adoption Assistance, and Independent Living; Family Support Welfare
Services; and Child Support Enforcement. ``Federal private sector
mandate'' includes a regulation that ``would impose an enforceable duty
upon the private sector, except (i) a condition of Federal assistance
or (ii) a duty arising from participation in a voluntary Federal
program.''
(2) The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. As the lead agency
for implementing CITES in the United States, we are responsible for
monitoring international trade in CITES wildlife and plants, including
their parts, products, and derivatives, and issuing documents under
CITES to authorize international trade in CITES wildlife and plants.
The structure of the program imposes no unfunded mandates; this rule
imposes no obligations on State, local, or Tribal governments.
Therefore, a Small Government Agency Plan is not required.
Takings--Executive Order 12630
In accordance with E.O. 12630 (Government Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Private Property Rights), we have
analyzed the potential takings implications of this rule.
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630. The rule would
not further restrict the import, export, or re-export of CITES
specimens. Rather, this rule updates and clarifies the regulations for
the import, export, and re-export of CITES specimens, which will assist
the importing and exporting community in conducting international trade
in CITES specimens. A takings implication assessment is not required.
Federalism--Executive Order 13132
In accordance with E.O. 13132 (federalism), this rule does not have
significant federalism effects. A federalism summary impact statement
is not required. These revisions to 50 CFR part 23 do not contain
significant federalism implications.
Civil Justice Reform--Executive Order 12988
In accordance with Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform),
this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order. Specifically,
this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This rule does not contain any new collections of information that
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 23
Animals, Endangered and threatened species, Exports, Fish, Foreign
trade, Imports, Incorporation by reference, Plants, Transportation,
Treaties, Wildlife.
Regulation Promulgation
Therefore, for the reasons discussed in the preamble, we hereby
amend part 23 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth
below.
PART 23--CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF
WILD FAUNA AND FLORA (CITES)
0
1. The authority citation for part 23 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (March 3, 1973), 27 U.S.T. 1087; and
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
0
2. Amend Sec. 23.5 by adding, in alphabetical order, a definition of
``assisted production'' to read as follows:
Sec. 23.5 How are the terms used in these regulations defined?
* * * * *
Assisted production means a plant specimen that does not fall
within the definition of ``artificially propagated'' and the source of
the specimen is considered not to be taken from the wild because it was
propagated or planted in an environment with some level of human
intervention for the purpose of plant production.
* * * * *
Sec. 23.6 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 23.6 by removing the word ``biennial'' in paragraph (g)
and adding in its place the words ``periodic Article VIII, paragraph
7(b)''.
Sec. 23.7 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 23.7(f)(2) by removing the words ``CITES' Guidelines for
transport and preparation for shipment of live wild animals and
plants'' and adding in their place the words ``CITES Guidelines for the
non-air transport of live wild animals and plants''.
0
5. Revise Sec. 23.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 23.9 Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with
the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for
inspection at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, International Affairs,
Division of Management Authority, 703-358-2104 and is available from
the sources listed elsewhere in this section. It is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected] or go to www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(a) International Air Transport Association (IATA), 800 Place
Victoria, P.O. Box 113, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4Z 1M1, 1-800-716-
6326, www.iata.org.
(1) Live Animals Regulations (LAR) 48th edition, effective January
1, 2022, into Sec. Sec. 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56.
(2) Perishable Cargo Regulations (PCR) 21st edition, effective
January 1, 2022, into Sec. Sec. 23.23, 23.26, and 23.56.
(b) CITES Secretariat: Palais des Nations, Avenue de la Paix 8-14,
1211 Gen[egrave]ve 10, Switzerland; telephone +41-(0)22-917-81-39/40;
email [email protected], www.cites.org.
(1) CITES Guidelines for the non-air transport of live wild animals
and plants, effective January 2, 2017, into Sec. Sec. 23.23, 23.26,
and 23.56, available for downloading at
(i) https://cites.org/eng/resources/transport/index.php
[[Page 10080]]
(ii) https://www.fws.gov/international/travel-and-trade/live-animal-transport.html
(2) [Reserved]
0
6. Amend Sec. 23.23 by revising paragraph (c)(7) to read as follows:
Sec. 23.23 What information is required on U.S. and foreign CITES
documents?
* * * * *
(c) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Required information Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(7) Humane transport of live specimens................. If the CITES document authorizes the export or re-
export of live specimens, a statement that the
document is valid only if the transport conditions
comply with the International Air Transport
Association Live Animals Regulations (for animals)
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 23.9) or the
International Air Transport Association Perishable
Cargo Regulations (for plants) (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 23.9) or, in the case of non-air
transport of species that may require transport
conditions in addition to or different from the Live
Animals Regulations or the Perishable Cargo
Regulations, the CITES Guidelines for the non-air
transport of wild animals and plants (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 23.9). A shipment containing
live specimens must comply with the International Air
Transport Association Live Animals Regulations (for
animals) or the International Air Transport
Association Perishable Cargo Regulations (for plants)
or, in the case of non-air transport of species that
may require transport conditions in addition to or
different from the Live Animals Regulations or the
Perishable Cargo Regulations, the CITES Guidelines for
the non-air transport of wild animals and plants.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 23.24 by adding paragraphs (j) and (k) to read as
follows:
Sec. 23.24 What code is used to show the source of the specimen?
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source of specimen Code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(j) Specimens taken in the marine environment X
not under the jurisdiction of any country (see
Sec. 23.39).
(k) Assisted production plant (see Sec. 23.5). Y
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
8. Amend Sec. 23.26 by revising paragraph (c)(8) to read as follows:
Sec. 23.26 When is a U.S. or foreign CITES document valid?
* * * * *
(c) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key phrase Conditions for an acceptable CITES document
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(8) Humane transport................................... Live wildlife or plants were transported in compliance
with the International Air Transport Association Live
Animals Regulations (for animals) (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 23.9) or the International Air
Transport Association Perishable Cargo Regulations
(for plants) (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
23.9) or, in the case of non-air transport of species
that may require transport conditions in addition to
or different from the Live Animals Regulations or the
Perishable Cargo Regulations, the CITES Guidelines for
the non-air transport of live wild animals and plants
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 23.9).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 23.56 by revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 23.56 What U.S. CITES document conditions do I need to follow?
(a) * * *
(2) For export and re-export of live wildlife and plants, transport
conditions must comply with the International Air Transport Association
Live Animals Regulations (for animals) (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 23.9) or the International Air Transport Association Perishable
Cargo Regulations (for plants) (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
23.9) or, in the case of non-air transport of species that may require
transport conditions in addition to or different from the Live Animals
Regulations or the Perishable Cargo Regulations, the CITES Guidelines
for the non-air transport of live wild animals and plants (incorporated
by reference, see Sec. 23.9).
* * * * *
Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2022-03533 Filed 2-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P