Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Cape Lookout, NC, 9450-9452 [2022-03671]
Download as PDF
9450
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by
telephone at (727) 824–7506, or a
designated representative via VHF radio
on channel 16. If authorization is
granted by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced daily from 6 a.m. until
10 p.m., on February 25, 2022, through
February 27, 2022.
Dated: February 15, 2022.
Matthew A. Thompson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Saint Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2022–03707 Filed 2–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2022–0094]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Cape
Lookout, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the Atlantic
Ocean near Cape Lookout, North
Carolina. This temporary safety zone
restricts vessel traffic in a portion of the
Atlantic Ocean while crews continue to
search a plane crash area. This action
restricts vessel traffic to protect
mariners, vessels, and dive crews from
the hazards associated with the work or
surveying a plane crash site. Entry of
vessels or persons into this safety zone
is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) North Carolina or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from February 22, 2022,
until March 1, 2022. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from February 15, 2022, until February
22, 2022.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022–
0094 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Feb 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Ken Farah,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 910–772–2221,
email ncmarineevents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest. The Coast Guard was
unable to publish an NPRM and hold a
reasonable comment period for this
rulemaking due to the emergent nature
of the recovery operations and required
publication of this rule. Immediate
action is needed to protect persons and
vessels from the hazards associated with
carrying out operations to recover the
downed aircraft and survey the area for
debris. It is impracticable and contrary
to the public interest to publish an
NPRM because a final rule needs to be
in place by February 15, 2022.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making it
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date of this rule
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest for the reasons
discussed above, immediate action is
needed to protect persons, property,
vessels, and the marine environment on
the navigable waters of the Atlantic
Ocean near Cape Lookout in North
Carolina.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Captain of the Port North Carolina
(COTP) has determined potential
hazards associated with operations
during recovery work on the site of a
plane crash. Work on this site is starting
February 15, 2022, and ongoing. This
work is a safety concern for anyone
transiting the designated recovery area
of the Atlantic Ocean and Cape Lookout,
NC, because the site work will involve
persons in the water. This rule is
necessary to protect persons, vessels,
and participants from the hazards
associated with the recovery efforts.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from on February 15, 2022, through
March 1, 2022. The safety zone will be
enforced from 7 a.m. through 7 p.m.
each day the rule is in effect. The safety
zone will include all navigable waters of
the Atlantic Ocean within a 1,000 yard
radius of position 34–48.81 N by 076–
17.23 W. The duration of this zone is
intended to protect persons, property,
vessels, and the marine environment on
the navigable waters of the Atlantic
Ocean during the recovery efforts of at
downed aircraft. No vessel or person
will be permitted to enter the safety
zone unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port North Carolina
or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the emergent nature of this
event and limited impact to the public.
The safety zone is in an area where
there is ample space to pass around this
area. Moreover, the Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule will allow vessels to
seek permission to pass through the
zone if necessary.
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Feb 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone that will prohibit entry within
1,000 yards of vessels and machinery
being used by personnel to survey and
recover an aircraft crash site at position
34–48.81 N by 076–17.23 W. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L[60d] of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9451
section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
INFORMATION CONTACT
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
■
2. Add § 165.T05–0094
§ 165.T05–0094 Safety Zone; Atlantic
Ocean, Cape Lookout, NC.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone on all navigable waters
within a 1,000 yard radius of position
34–48.81 N by 076–17.23 W on the
Atlantic Ocean near Cape Lookout,
North Carolina.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by
the Captain of the Port North Carolina
(COTP) for the enforcement of the safety
zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations governing safety zones in
§ 165.23 apply to the area described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative. Unless
permission to remain in the zone has
been granted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative, a vessel
within this safety zone must
immediately depart the zone when this
section becomes effective.
(3) The Captain of the Port, North
Carolina can be reached through the
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina
Command Duty Officer, Wilmington,
North Carolina, at telephone number
910–343–3882.
(4) The Coast Guard and designated
security vessels enforcing the safety
zone can be contacted on VHF–FM
marine band radio channel 13 (165.65
MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
9452
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the safety zone by
Federal, State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 7 a.m. through 7
p.m. each day from February 15, 2022,
through March 1, 2022.
Dated: February 15, 2022.
Matthew J. Baer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2022–03671 Filed 2–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2022–0002; FRL–9413–01–
R4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Georgia:
Approval of Revisions to State
Implementation Plan; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction and
clarification.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is correcting statements
contained in a July 11, 2002, Federal
Register notice of direct final
rulemaking approving changes to the
Georgia State Implementation Plan
(SIP). Specifically, EPA stated that it
was approving a change to the public
notice requirements in Georgia’s SIP for
federally-enforceable operating permits.
However, this change was never
effective at the state level and, therefore,
was never incorporated into the SIP.
EPA is publishing this correction notice
to eliminate any potential confusion
regarding the public notice
requirements in Georgia’s SIP for these
permits.
DATES: Effective February 22, 2022.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this notice of correction
under Docket Identification No. EPA–
R04–OAR–2022–0002 to provide
electronic access to the July 11, 2002,
submittal. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Feb 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air and Radiation Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone
at 404–562–9089 or via electronic mail
at akers.brad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires
states to develop and submit to EPA a
SIP to ensure that state air quality meets
the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). These NAAQS
currently address six criteria pollutants:
Carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and
sulfur dioxide. Each state has a SIP
containing the control measures and
strategies used to attain and maintain
the NAAQS. The SIP is extensive,
containing such elements as air
pollution control and permitting
regulations, emission inventories,
attainment demonstrations, and
enforcement mechanisms. Each state
must formally adopt the elements it
proposes to include in its SIP after the
public has had an opportunity to
comment on them and must then submit
the proposed SIP revisions to EPA. If the
revisions meet all relevant CAA
requirements, EPA must approve them
through notice and comment
rulemaking and incorporate the
elements into the SIP at 40 Code of
Federal Regulations part 52—‘‘Approval
and Promulgation of Implementation
Plans.’’ 1
EPA incorporated Georgia’s
‘‘Operating (SIP) Permits’’ rule—Ga.
Comp. R. & Regs. 391–3–1–.03, Permits,
at Section (2) (hereinafter Rule 391–3–
1–.03(2))—into the Georgia SIP on
August 30, 1995. See 60 FR 45048.
Paragraph (i) of this rule requires the
State to notify EPA and the public prior
to issuing any federally-enforceable
1 Georgia’s
PO 00000
SIP is set forth at 40 CFR 52.570.
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
operating permit and provide the
opportunity to comment on the draft
permit. Georgia has not revised this
public notice provision since its initial
incorporation into the SIP.2
On July 11, 2002 (67 FR 45909), EPA
approved numerous changes to the
Georgia SIP through a direct final rule.
This rule addressed regulatory changes
transmitted to EPA on December 6,
1999, March 21, 2000, January 4, 2001,
August 21, 2001, and December 28,
2001, by the State of Georgia, through
the Georgia Department of Natural
Resources’ Environmental Protection
Division (also known as GA EPD).
GA EPD’s March 21, 2000, submittal
contained several revisions to Rule 391–
3–1–.03 and information indicating that
it included changes to Rule 391–3–1–
.03(2) for EPA approval. Specifically,
the submittal contained a strikeout/
underline draft version of Rule 391–3–
1–.03(2)(i), that purported to eliminate
the phrase ‘‘on the draft permit.’’ In the
preamble of the July 11, 2002, notice of
direct final rulemaking, EPA indicated it
was removing this phrase, stating that
‘‘Rule 391–3–1–.03(2)(i) is being
amended to allow the public and EPA
notification and review of a permit
application to begin upon receipt of a
permit application rather than upon
completion of a draft permit.’’ 3 4 See 67
FR 45909 at 45910. However, the
submittal also included a final version
of the rule that retained the phrase ‘‘on
the draft permit’’ and a hearing record
showing that the draft version of Rule
391–3–1–.03(2)(i) (eliminating the
phrase ‘‘on the draft permit’’), was never
adopted by the Georgia Board of Natural
Resources, and, therefore, was never
state effective.
The direct final rule incorporated the
final version of Rule 391–3–1–.03 into
the SIP at 40 CFR 52.570(c). Because the
draft change to the public notice
requirement in Rule 391–3–1–.03(2)(i)
(eliminating the phrase ‘‘on the draft
permit’’), was never state effective, EPA
could not have incorporated it into the
SIP. Therefore, EPA did not approve any
change to 391–3–1–.03(2) in the July 11,
2 The SIP-approved version of Rule 391–3–1–
.03(2) states ‘‘Prior to the issuance of any federally
enforceable operating permit, EPA and the public
will be notified and given a chance for comment on
the draft permit.’’
3 EPA erroneously made the draft change to Rule
391–3–1–.03(2)(i) in its online Georgia SIP
compilation at https://www.epa.gov/sips-ga. EPA
will correct this error in the SIP compilation at the
time of publication or shortly thereafter.
4 The SIP table at 40 CFR 52.570(c) contains an
error in the entry for Rule 391–3–1–.03(2)
indicating a December 26, 2001, state effective date.
EPA intends to correct this table entry to reflect a
state effective date of August 17, 1994, in the next
routine update to the materials incorporated by
reference into the Georgia SIP.
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9450-9452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2022-0094]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Cape Lookout, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean near Cape Lookout, North
Carolina. This temporary safety zone restricts vessel traffic in a
portion of the Atlantic Ocean while crews continue to search a plane
crash area. This action restricts vessel traffic to protect mariners,
vessels, and dive crews from the hazards associated with the work or
surveying a plane crash site. Entry of vessels or persons into this
safety zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain
of the Port (COTP) North Carolina or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from February 22,
2022, until March 1, 2022. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from February 15, 2022, until February 22, 2022.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2022-0094 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Ken Farah, Waterways Management Division,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 910-772-2221, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The Coast Guard was unable to publish
an NPRM and hold a reasonable comment period for this rulemaking due to
the emergent nature of the recovery operations and required publication
of this rule. Immediate action is needed to protect persons and vessels
from the hazards associated with carrying out operations to recover the
downed aircraft and survey the area for debris. It is impracticable and
contrary to the public interest to publish an NPRM because a final rule
needs to be in place by February 15, 2022.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective
date of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public
interest for the reasons discussed above, immediate action is needed to
protect persons, property, vessels, and the marine environment on the
navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean near Cape Lookout in North
Carolina.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port North Carolina (COTP) has determined
potential hazards associated with operations during recovery work on
the site of a plane crash. Work on this site is starting February 15,
2022, and ongoing. This work is a safety concern for anyone transiting
the designated recovery area of the Atlantic Ocean and Cape Lookout,
NC, because the site work will involve persons in the water. This rule
is necessary to protect persons, vessels, and participants from the
hazards associated with the recovery efforts.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from on February 15, 2022,
through March 1, 2022. The safety zone will be enforced from 7 a.m.
through 7 p.m. each day the rule is in effect. The safety zone will
include all navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean within a 1,000 yard
radius of position 34-48.81 N by 076-17.23 W. The duration of this zone
is intended to protect persons, property, vessels, and the marine
environment on the navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean during the
recovery efforts of at downed aircraft. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port North Carolina or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the emergent
nature of this event and limited impact to the public. The safety zone
is in an area where there is ample space to pass around this area.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule will allow
vessels to seek permission to pass through the zone if necessary.
[[Page 9451]]
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone that will prohibit entry within 1,000 yards of vessels and
machinery being used by personnel to survey and recover an aircraft
crash site at position 34-48.81 N by 076-17.23 W. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L[60d] of Appendix A,
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0094
Sec. 165.T05-0094 Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Cape Lookout, NC.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone on all navigable
waters within a 1,000 yard radius of position 34-48.81 N by 076-17.23 W
on the Atlantic Ocean near Cape Lookout, North Carolina.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section--
Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
designated by the Captain of the Port North Carolina (COTP) for the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations governing safety zones
in Sec. 165.23 apply to the area described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
Unless permission to remain in the zone has been granted by the COTP or
the COTP's designated representative, a vessel within this safety zone
must immediately depart the zone when this section becomes effective.
(3) The Captain of the Port, North Carolina can be reached through
the Coast Guard Sector North Carolina Command Duty Officer, Wilmington,
North Carolina, at telephone number 910-343-3882.
(4) The Coast Guard and designated security vessels enforcing the
safety zone can be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13
(165.65 MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
[[Page 9452]]
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7 a.m.
through 7 p.m. each day from February 15, 2022, through March 1, 2022.
Dated: February 15, 2022.
Matthew J. Baer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2022-03671 Filed 2-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P