Medical Devices; Cardiovascular Devices; Classification of the Percutaneous Catheter for Creation of an Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access, 9240-9242 [2022-03496]
Download as PDF
9240
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 870
[Docket No. FDA–2021–N–1029]
Medical Devices; Cardiovascular
Devices; Classification of the
Percutaneous Catheter for Creation of
an Arteriovenous Fistula for
Hemodialysis Access
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the percutaneous catheter for
creation of an arteriovenous fistula for
hemodialysis access into class II (special
controls). The special controls that
apply to the device type are identified
in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the percutaneous
catheter for creation of an arteriovenous
fistula for hemodialysis access’
classification. We are taking this action
because we have determined that
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe
this action will also enhance patients’
access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective February
18, 2022. The classification was
applicable on June 22, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carmen Gacchina Johnson, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2120,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–5244, Carmen.Gacchina@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
percutaneous catheter for creation of an
arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis
access as class II (special controls),
which we have determined will provide
a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe
this action will enhance patients’ access
to beneficial innovation, by placing the
device into a lower device class than the
automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 17, 2022
Jkt 256001
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We believe this De Novo classification
will enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovation. When FDA
classifies a device into class I or II via
the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see
section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act).
As a result, other device sponsors do not
have to submit a De Novo request or
premarket approval application to
market a substantially equivalent device
(see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
defining ‘‘substantial equivalence’’).
Instead, sponsors can use the lessburdensome 510(k) process, when
necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On February 3, 2016, FDA received
TVA Medical, Inc.’s request for De Novo
classification of the everlinQ endoAVF
System. Subsequently, on January 10,
2017, FDA received Avenu Medical,
Inc.’s similar request for De Novo
classification of the Ellipsys Vascular
Access System. FDA reviewed both
requests in order to classify the devices
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the requests,
we determined that the devices can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the devices.
Therefore, on June 22, 2018, FDA
issued orders to both requesters
classifying their devices into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the devices by adding
21 CFR 870.1252.1 We have named the
generic type of device percutaneous
catheter for creation of an arteriovenous
1 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
fistula for hemodialysis access, and it is
identified as a single use percutaneous
catheter system that creates an
arteriovenous fistula in the arm of
patients with chronic kidney disease
who need hemodialysis.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
9241
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
TABLE 1—PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER FOR CREATION OF AN ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA FOR HEMODIALYSIS ACCESS RISKS
AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Unintended vascular or tissue injury ........................................................
Non-clinical performance testing, Animal testing, Clinical performance
testing, and Labeling.
Non-clinical performance testing, Animal testing, Clinical performance
testing, and Labeling.
Animal testing and Clinical performance testing.
Clinical performance testing and Labeling.
Biocompatibility evaluation and Labeling.
Sterilization validation, Shelf life testing, and Labeling.
Non-clinical performance testing, Electrical safety testing, and Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing.
Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
Adverse hemodynamic effects .................................................................
Failure to create a durable fistula that is usable for hemodialysis ..........
Use of the device adversely impacts future vascular access sites .........
Adverse tissue reaction ............................................................................
Infection ....................................................................................................
Electrical malfunction or interference leading to electrical shock, device
failure, or inappropriate activation.
Software malfunction leading to device failure or inappropriate activation.
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. We encourage sponsors to consult
with us if they wish to use a non-animal
testing method they believe is suitable,
adequate, validated, and feasible. We
will consider if such an alternative
method could be assessed for
equivalency to an animal test method.
This device is subject to premarket
notification requirements under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 17, 2022
Jkt 256001
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 870
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 870 is
amended as follows:
PART 870—CARDIOVASCULAR
DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 870
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 870.1252 to subpart B to read
as follows:
■
§ 870.1252 Percutaneous catheter for
creation of an arteriovenous fistula for
hemodialysis access.
(a) Identification. This device is a
single use percutaneous catheter system
that creates an arteriovenous fistula in
the arm of patients with chronic kidney
disease who need hemodialysis.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing must
evaluate:
(i) The ability to safely deliver,
deploy, and remove the device;
(ii) The ability of the device to create
an arteriovenous fistula;
(iii) The ability of the arteriovenous
fistula to attain a blood flow rate and
diameter suitable for hemodialysis;
(iv) The ability of the fistula to be
used for vascular access for
hemodialysis;
(v) The patency of the fistula; and
(vi) The rates and types of all adverse
events.
(2) Animal testing must demonstrate
that the device performs as intended
under anticipated conditions of use. The
following performance characteristics
must be assessed:
(i) Delivery, deployment, and retrieval
of the device;
(ii) Compatibility with other devices
labeled for use with the device;
(iii) Patency of the fistula;
(iv) Characterization of blood flow at
the time of the fistula creation
procedure and at chronic followup; and
(v) Gross pathology and
histopathology assessing vascular injury
and downstream embolization.
(3) Non-clinical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be
tested:
(i) Simulated-use testing in a
clinically relevant bench anatomic
model to assess the delivery,
deployment, activation, and retrieval of
the device;
(ii) Tensile strengths of joints and
components;
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
9242
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) Accurate positioning and
alignment of the device to achieve
fistula creation; and
(iv) Characterization and verification
of all dimensions.
(4) Electrical performance, electrical
safety, and electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC) testing must be
performed for devices with electrical
components.
(5) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed
for devices that use software.
(6) All patient-contacting components
of the device must be demonstrated to
be biocompatible.
(7) Performance data must
demonstrate the sterility of the device
components intended to be provided
sterile.
(8) Performance data must support the
shelf life of the device by demonstrating
continued sterility, package integrity,
and device functionality over the
identified shelf life.
(9) Labeling for the device must
include:
(i) Instructions for use;
(ii) Identification of system
components and compatible devices;
(iii) Expertise needed for the safe use
of the device;
(iv) A detailed summary of the
clinical testing conducted and the
patient population studied; and
(v) A shelf life and storage conditions.
Dated: February 11, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022–03496 Filed 2–17–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 886
[Docket No. FDA–2022–N–0104]
Medical Devices; Ophthalmic Devices;
Classification of the Electromechanical
Tear Stimulator
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the electromechanical tear
stimulator into class II (special
controls). The special controls that
apply to the device type are identified
in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the
electromechanical tear stimulator’s
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 17, 2022
Jkt 256001
classification. We are taking this action
because we have determined that
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe
this action will also enhance patients’
access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective February
18, 2022 . The classification was
applicable on May 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leonid Livshitz, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1234, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6975,
Leonid.Livshitz@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
electromechanical tear stimulator as
class II (special controls), which we
have determined will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe
this action will enhance patients’ access
to beneficial innovation by placing the
device into a lower device class than the
automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 (Pub. L. 105–115) established
the first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144)
modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure.
A device sponsor may utilize either
procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially
equivalent device (see section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act, defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On May 15, 2019, FDA received
Olympic Ophthalmics, Inc.’s request for
De Novo classification of the iTEAR100
Neurostimulator. FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9240-9242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03496]
[[Page 9240]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 870
[Docket No. FDA-2021-N-1029]
Medical Devices; Cardiovascular Devices; Classification of the
Percutaneous Catheter for Creation of an Arteriovenous Fistula for
Hemodialysis Access
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying
the percutaneous catheter for creation of an arteriovenous fistula for
hemodialysis access into class II (special controls). The special
controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and
will be part of the codified language for the percutaneous catheter for
creation of an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access'
classification. We are taking this action because we have determined
that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will
provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the
device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to
beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective February 18, 2022. The classification
was applicable on June 22, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carmen Gacchina Johnson, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2120, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-5244, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the percutaneous catheter for
creation of an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access as class
II (special controls), which we have determined will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In addition, we
believe this action will enhance patients' access to beneficial
innovation, by placing the device into a lower device class than the
automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of
the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation. When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the device can serve as a
predicate for future devices of that type, including for 510(k)s (see
section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially equivalent device (see section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead,
sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On February 3, 2016, FDA received TVA Medical, Inc.'s request for
De Novo classification of the everlinQ endoAVF System. Subsequently, on
January 10, 2017, FDA received Avenu Medical, Inc.'s similar request
for De Novo classification of the Ellipsys Vascular Access System. FDA
reviewed both requests in order to classify the devices under the
criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the requests, we determined that the devices
can be classified into class II with the establishment of special
controls. FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition
to the general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the devices.
Therefore, on June 22, 2018, FDA issued orders to both requesters
classifying their devices into class II. In this final order, FDA is
codifying the classification of the devices by adding 21 CFR
870.1252.\1\ We have named the generic type of device percutaneous
catheter for creation of an arteriovenous
[[Page 9241]]
fistula for hemodialysis access, and it is identified as a single use
percutaneous catheter system that creates an arteriovenous fistula in
the arm of patients with chronic kidney disease who need hemodialysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Percutaneous Catheter for Creation of an Arteriovenous Fistula
for Hemodialysis Access Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unintended vascular or tissue injury... Non-clinical performance
testing, Animal testing,
Clinical performance testing,
and Labeling.
Adverse hemodynamic effects............ Non-clinical performance
testing, Animal testing,
Clinical performance testing,
and Labeling.
Failure to create a durable fistula Animal testing and Clinical
that is usable for hemodialysis. performance testing.
Use of the device adversely impacts Clinical performance testing
future vascular access sites. and Labeling.
Adverse tissue reaction................ Biocompatibility evaluation and
Labeling.
Infection.............................. Sterilization validation, Shelf
life testing, and Labeling.
Electrical malfunction or interference Non-clinical performance
leading to electrical shock, device testing, Electrical safety
failure, or inappropriate activation. testing, and Electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC) testing.
Software malfunction leading to device Software verification,
failure or inappropriate activation. validation, and hazard
analysis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. We encourage sponsors to consult with us if they wish to
use a non-animal testing method they believe is suitable, adequate,
validated, and feasible. We will consider if such an alternative method
could be assessed for equivalency to an animal test method. This device
is subject to premarket notification requirements under section 510(k)
of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part
820, regarding quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 870
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
870 is amended as follows:
PART 870--CARDIOVASCULAR DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 870 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 870.1252 to subpart B to read as follows:
Sec. 870.1252 Percutaneous catheter for creation of an arteriovenous
fistula for hemodialysis access.
(a) Identification. This device is a single use percutaneous
catheter system that creates an arteriovenous fistula in the arm of
patients with chronic kidney disease who need hemodialysis.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing must evaluate:
(i) The ability to safely deliver, deploy, and remove the device;
(ii) The ability of the device to create an arteriovenous fistula;
(iii) The ability of the arteriovenous fistula to attain a blood
flow rate and diameter suitable for hemodialysis;
(iv) The ability of the fistula to be used for vascular access for
hemodialysis;
(v) The patency of the fistula; and
(vi) The rates and types of all adverse events.
(2) Animal testing must demonstrate that the device performs as
intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance
characteristics must be assessed:
(i) Delivery, deployment, and retrieval of the device;
(ii) Compatibility with other devices labeled for use with the
device;
(iii) Patency of the fistula;
(iv) Characterization of blood flow at the time of the fistula
creation procedure and at chronic followup; and
(v) Gross pathology and histopathology assessing vascular injury
and downstream embolization.
(3) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The
following performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Simulated-use testing in a clinically relevant bench anatomic
model to assess the delivery, deployment, activation, and retrieval of
the device;
(ii) Tensile strengths of joints and components;
[[Page 9242]]
(iii) Accurate positioning and alignment of the device to achieve
fistula creation; and
(iv) Characterization and verification of all dimensions.
(4) Electrical performance, electrical safety, and electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC) testing must be performed for devices with
electrical components.
(5) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be
performed for devices that use software.
(6) All patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(7) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the device
components intended to be provided sterile.
(8) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by
demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device
functionality over the identified shelf life.
(9) Labeling for the device must include:
(i) Instructions for use;
(ii) Identification of system components and compatible devices;
(iii) Expertise needed for the safe use of the device;
(iv) A detailed summary of the clinical testing conducted and the
patient population studied; and
(v) A shelf life and storage conditions.
Dated: February 11, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-03496 Filed 2-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P