Television Broadcasting Services; Billings, Montana; Correction, 8509 [2022-03069]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2022 / Proposed Rules
2. Should the Commission include
MTOs in a proposed demurrage billing
regulation?
3. Should a proposed demurrage
billing regulation distinguish between
the demurrage MTOs charge to shippers
and the demurrage MTOs charge to
VOCCs? That is, should the Commission
regulate the format in which MTOs bill
VOCCs?
4. What percentage of demurrage and
detention bills contain inaccurate
information, and which information is
most often disputed?
5. How much does the type of
information included on or with
demurrage and detention billings vary
among common carriers, among marine
terminal operators, and between VOCCs
and NVOCCs?
B. Minimum billing information.
6. What type of information should be
required on billings. Should the
Commission require certain essential
information included on invoices such
as:
a. Bill of lading number
b. Container number
c. Billing date
d. Payment due date
e. Start/end of free time
f. Start/end of demurrage/detention/per
diem clock
g. Demurrage/detention/per diem rate
schedule
h. Location of the notice of the charge
(i.e., tariff, service contract number
and section or MTO schedule)
i. For import shipments:
i. Vessel arrival date
ii. Container availability date
j. For export shipments:
i. Earliest return date, including
identifying any modifications to the
earliest return date
k. Any intervening clock-stopping
events, for example:
i. Unavailability of container
ii. Unavailability of pickup or return
locations
iii. Unavailability of appointments
(where applicable)
iv. Restrictions on chassis accepted
v. Force majeure-related events
l. Please note if any portion of the
charge is a pass-through of charges
levied by the MTO or Port.
C. Billing practices.
7. What information or timeframes
should be required for VOCC and
NVOCC demurrage and detention bills?
Should the Commission require
different types of information or
timeframes?
8. Do common carriers invoice
multiple parties for demurrage and/or
detention charges? If multiple parties
are invoiced for charges, should the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Feb 14, 2022
Jkt 256001
billing party be required to identify all
such parties receiving an invoice for the
charges at issue?
9. Should the billing party be required
to identify the basis of why the invoiced
party is the proper party in interest and
therefore liable for the charges? (i.e., as
shipper, consignee, beneficial cargo
owner, motor carrier or an agent, or as
a party acting on behalf of another party
pursuant to the common carrier’s
merchant clause in its bill of lading.)
10. Should the Commission, for
purposes of clarity and visibility of
charges, require MTOs to bill demurrage
directly to shippers (rather than billing
VOCCs who then bill shippers for
demurrage)? In that scenario, MTOs
would bill shippers directly for
demurrage, and carriers would continue
to bill detention to shippers.
11. How long from the point of
accrual of a demurrage or detention
charge does it typically take to receive
a demurrage or detention invoice or
billing?
12. Should the Commission require
demurrage and detention invoices to be
issued within 60 days of date when the
detention/demurrage/per diem stops
accruing?
13. Should the Commission require
specific information be included on the
invoice regarding how to dispute a
charge? If so, what information should
be required? For example, should the
Commission require invoices to include
contact information for disputing
charges, identify circumstances for
when a charge may be waived, or
identify the billing parties’ evidentiary
requirements sufficient to support a
waiver of the charges?
14. How long from the point of
dismissal of a charge does it typically
take to receive a refund? Should the
Commission require that refunds of
demurrage or detention bills be issued
within a certain time period and what
should that timeframe be?
15. How would a regulation on
demurrage and detention billing
requirements impact, conflict with, or
preempt any other applicable laws,
regulations, or arrangements (such as
the UIIA)?
16. Please provide any other views or
data you believe would help inform the
Commission’s decision whether to
pursue a proposed regulation on
demurrage and detention billing
information and practices.
8509
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 22–39; RM–11917; DA
22–87; FR ID 71247]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Billings, Montana; Correction
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission published a document in
the Federal Register of February 4,
2022, concerning a petition for
rulemaking filed by Scripps
Broadcasting Holdings LLC, licensee of
KTVQ(TV), channel 10, Billings,
Montana, requesting the substitution of
channel 20 for channel 10 in the Table
of Allotments. The document contained
the incorrect call sign of the licensee.
The document also contained an
incorrect licensee name.
DATES: February 15, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at (202)
418–1647 or Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Correction
In FR Doc. 2022–02337, in the
Federal Register of February 4, 2022,
appearing on page 6473, in the third
column, correct the first sentence in the
SUMMARY caption to read:
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission (Commission) has before it
a petition for rulemaking filed by
Scripps Broadcasting Holdings LLC
(Petitioner), the licensee of KTVQ(TV),
channel 10, Billings, Montana.
Dated: February 7, 2022.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2022–03069 Filed 2–14–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2021–0041;
FF09E21000; FXES1111090FEDR 223]
RIN 1018–BE65
By the Commission.
William Cody,
Secretary.
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Endangered Species for
Prostrate Milkweed and Designation of
Critical Habitat
[FR Doc. 2022–02981 Filed 2–14–22; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 6730–02–P
Interior.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
Fish and Wildlife Service,
15FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 8509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03069]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 22-39; RM-11917; DA 22-87; FR ID 71247]
Television Broadcasting Services; Billings, Montana; Correction
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission published a document in
the Federal Register of February 4, 2022, concerning a petition for
rulemaking filed by Scripps Broadcasting Holdings LLC, licensee of
KTVQ(TV), channel 10, Billings, Montana, requesting the substitution of
channel 20 for channel 10 in the Table of Allotments. The document
contained the incorrect call sign of the licensee. The document also
contained an incorrect licensee name.
DATES: February 15, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at
(202) 418-1647 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
In FR Doc. 2022-02337, in the Federal Register of February 4, 2022,
appearing on page 6473, in the third column, correct the first sentence
in the Summary caption to read:
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (Commission) has before
it a petition for rulemaking filed by Scripps Broadcasting Holdings LLC
(Petitioner), the licensee of KTVQ(TV), channel 10, Billings, Montana.
Dated: February 7, 2022.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2022-03069 Filed 2-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P