Indemnification of Employees, 8430-8432 [2022-03058]
Download as PDF
8430
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(e) Legal proceedings to which the
United States is a party.
§ 1167.3
Definitions.
The following definitions apply to
this part:
Agency or NEH means the National
Endowment for the Humanities.
Demand means a subpoena, order, or
other demand of a court or other
competent authority, issued in a legal
proceeding, for the production of
official records and information or for
the testimony of an NEH employee.
General Counsel means the General
Counsel of the agency, or any person to
whom the General Counsel has
delegated authority under this part.
Legal proceeding means any
proceeding before a court of law,
administrative board or commission,
hearing officer, or other body
conducting a legal or administrative
proceeding.
NEH employee or employee means
any present or former officer or
employee of NEH; any other individual
hired through contractual agreement by
or on behalf of NEH, or who has
performed or is performing services
under such an agreement for NEH; and
any individual who served or is serving
on an NEH advisory committee.
Official records and information
means all documents and material in
the custody and control of NEH; relating
to information in the custody and
control of NEH; or acquired by an NEH
employee in the performance of his or
her official duties or because of his or
her official status, while the individual
was employed by or on behalf of the
NEH.
Request means any request in
connection with an ongoing or
threatened legal proceeding, by
whatever method, for the production of
official records and information or for
testimony, other than a demand.
Testimony means any written or oral
statement by a witness, and includes
depositions, answers to interrogatories,
affidavits, declarations, and statements
at a hearing or trial.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 1167.4 Testimony and production of
official records and information.
(a) No employee may produce official
records and information or provide any
testimony in response to a demand or
request unless authorized to do so by
the General Counsel in accordance with
this part.
(b) The General Counsel, in his or her
discretion, may grant an employee
permission to testify or produce official
records and information in response to
a demand or request. In making this
decision, the General Counsel shall
consider whether:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 14, 2022
Jkt 256001
(1) Allowing such testimony or
production of records would be
consistent with the purposes of this
part;
(2) Allowing such testimony or
production of records would be
necessary to prevent a miscarriage of
justice;
(3) Allowing such testimony or
production of records would be in the
best interest of NEH and the United
States; or
(4) NEH has an interest in the
outcome of the legal proceeding.
(c) If authorized to testify pursuant to
this part, an employee may testify as to
facts within his or her personal
knowledge or produce official records
and information, but, unless specifically
authorized to do so by the General
Counsel, shall not:
(1) Disclose confidential or privileged
information;
(2) Testify as to matters regarding
which the General Counsel determines
that testimony would not be in the best
interest of NEH or the United States;
(3) Produce official records and
information regarding which the
General Counsel determines that
production would not be in the best
interest of NEH or the United States; or
(4) Testify as an expert or opinion
witness with regard to any matter
arising out of the employee’s official
duties or the functions of NEH. (See also
5 CFR 2635.805.)
§ 1167.5
Procedure when demand is made.
(a) Whenever an employee is served
with a demand to testify in his or her
official capacity, or to produce official
records and information, the employee
shall notify the General Counsel
immediately.
(b) The General Counsel shall review
the demand and, in accordance with the
provisions of § 1167.4, shall determine
whether, or on what conditions, to
authorize the employee to testify and/or
produce official records and
information.
(c) If a demand requires a response
before the General Counsel has made
the determination referred to in
paragraph (b) of this section, the General
Counsel shall provide the court or other
competent authority with a copy of this
part, inform the court or other
competent authority that the demand is
being reviewed, and seek a stay of the
demand pending a final determination.
(d) If a court or other competent
authority orders that an NEH employee
comply with a demand notwithstanding
a final decision by the General Counsel
to the contrary, or at any other stage in
the process, the General Counsel shall
advise the employee on how to respond
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to such order and may arrange for legal
representation of the employee.
§ 1167.6 Office of Inspector General
employees.
Notwithstanding the requirements set
forth in §§ 1167.1 through 1167.5, when
an employee of the agency’s Office of
the Inspector General receives a demand
or request to provide testimony or
produce official records and
information, the Inspector General or
his or her designee shall be responsible
for performing the functions assigned to
the General Counsel under this part
with respect to such demand or request.
Dated: February 9, 2022.
Samuel Roth,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for
the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2022–03060 Filed 2–14–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the
Humanities
45 CFR Part 1173
RIN 3136–AA45
Indemnification of Employees
National Endowment for the
Humanities, National Foundation on the
Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The National Endowment for
the Humanities (NEH) is adopting as
final its proposed policy that permits
indemnification of NEH employees in
appropriate circumstances, as
determined by the Chairperson of NEH
or the Chairperson’s designee, for claims
made against NEH employees as a result
of actions taken by them in the scope of
their employment.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
February 15, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel,
National Endowment for the
Humanities, 400 7th Street SW, Room
4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202) 606–
8322; gencounsel@neh.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On December 20, 2021, NEH
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (86 FR
71863), requesting public comment on a
proposed rule regarding indemnification
of NEH employees. The agency received
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
no comments. Accordingly, NEH is
adopting the rule as proposed.
This policy permits, but does not
require, NEH to indemnify an employee
who suffers an adverse verdict,
judgment, or other monetary award,
provided that the act or omission giving
rise to the award occurred within the
scope of the employee’s employment,
and that such indemnification is in the
interest of NEH, as determined by the
Chairperson or the Chairperson’s
designee. The policy also permits, but
does not require, NEH to settle a claim
brought against an employee in his or
her individual capacity, upon a similar
determination by the Chairperson or the
Chairperson’s designee. This policy
applies to actions pending against NEH
employees as of the effective date and
to actions commenced after that date.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for review.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have
federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This rulemaking meets the applicable
standards set forth in section 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rulemaking is written
in clear language designed to help
reduce litigation.
Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal
Governments
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13175, NEH evaluated this rulemaking
and determined that it will not have any
potential effects on Federally recognized
Indian Tribes.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Executive Order 12630, Takings
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this rulemaking does not have
significant takings implications.
Therefore, a takings implication
assessment is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
This rulemaking will not have a
significant adverse impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 14, 2022
Jkt 256001
including small businesses, small
governmental jurisdictions, or certain
small not-for-profit organizations.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. This action
contains no provisions constituting a
collection of information pursuant to
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rulemaking does not contain a
Federal mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year.
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969
This rulemaking will not have a
significant effect on the human
environment.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking will not be a major
rule as defined in section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rulemaking
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, a
major increase in costs or prices,
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
E-Government Act of 2002
All information about NEH required
to be published in the Federal Register
may be accessed at www.neh.gov. The
website www.regulations.gov contains
electronic dockets for NEH’s
rulemakings under the Administrative
Procedure Act of 1946.
Plain Writing Act of 2010
To ensure this proposed rule speaks
in plain and clear language so that the
public can use and understand it, NEH
modeled the language of the proposed
rule on the Federal Plain Language
Guidelines.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1173
Administrative practice and
procedure.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the National Endowment for
the Humanities amends 45 CFR chapter
XI subchapter D by adding part 1173 to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8431
PART 1173—INDEMNIFICATION OF
EMPLOYEES
Sec.
1173.1
1173.2
Policy on employee indemnification
[Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301.
§ 1173.1 Policy on employee
indemnification.
(a) This part explains when the
National Endowment for the Humanities
(NEH) will indemnify you, an employee
or a former employee of NEH, against a
verdict, judgment, or other monetary
award that a court or other competent
authority renders against you. When
NEH indemnifies you against a verdict,
judgment, or other monetary award, it
means that NEH will pay the amounts
that the court orders you to pay.
(b) This part also explains when NEH
will settle a claim (also referred to as
compromising a claim) that someone
brings or threatens to bring against you
in court or before another competent
authority. It is only in exceptional
circumstances that NEH will agree to
settle a claim before a court or other
competent authority has entered a
verdict, judgment, or monetary award
against you.
(c) In order for NEH to indemnify you
or settle a claim:
(1) The verdict, judgment, or
monetary award to be paid or the claim
to be settled must relate to something
that you did (or failed to do) within the
scope of your employment with NEH;
and
(2) The Chairperson of NEH or
someone the Chairperson designates
(the Agency Official) must determine, as
a matter of discretion, that indemnifying
you or settling the claim would be in the
interest of NEH.
(d) If you become aware that someone
has made or may make a claim against
you personally as a result of something
that you did (or failed to do) within the
scope of your employment, you must
immediately notify the Office of the
General Counsel.
(e) To request that NEH indemnify
you or settle a claim against you, you
must submit a written request to the
Office of the General Counsel. You must
include a copy of the verdict, judgment,
monetary award, or settlement proposal,
as appropriate. The Office of the General
Counsel may consult about the matter
with your supervisor, other agency
employees, and the Department of
Justice.
(f) The Agency Official may waive the
requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e)
of this section if it would be in the
interest of NEH to do so.
(g) If the Agency Official determines
that NEH will indemnify you or settle a
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
8432
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
claim on your behalf, NEH’s
commitment will be subject to the
availability of appropriated funds. The
Agency Official may impose other
conditions or limitations on the
determination at his or her discretion.
(h) If the Chairperson requests
indemnification or settlement of a
claim, the General Counsel will perform
the functions assigned to the
Chairperson under this section with
respect to that request.
§ 1173.2
[Reserved]
Dated: February 9, 2022.
Samuel Roth,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for
the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2022–03058 Filed 2–14–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 180117042–8884–02; RTID
0648–XB796]
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure of the
General category January through March
fishery for 2022.
AGENCY:
NMFS closes the General
category fishery for large medium and
giant (i.e., measuring 73 inches (185 cm)
curved fork length or greater) Atlantic
bluefin tuna (BFT) for the January
through March subquota time period.
This action applies to Atlantic Tunas
General category (commercial)
permitted vessels and HMS Charter/
Headboat permitted vessels with a
commercial sale endorsement when
fishing commercially for BFT.
DATES: Effective 11:30 p.m., local time,
February 11, 2022, through May 31,
2022.
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Redd, Jr., larry.redd@noaa.gov,
301–427–8503, Nicholas Velseboer,
nicholas.velsboer@noaa.gov, 978–281–
9260, or Thomas Warren,
thomas.warren@noaa.gov, 978–281–
9347.
Atlantic
HMS fisheries, including BFT fisheries,
are managed under the authority of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 14, 2022
Jkt 256001
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA;
16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.) and the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.). The 2006 Consolidated Atlantic
HMS Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
and its amendments are implemented
by regulations at 50 CFR part 635.
Section 635.27 divides the U.S. BFT
quota recommended by the
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
and as implemented by the United
States among the various domestic
fishing categories, per the allocations
established in the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments. NMFS
is required under the Magnuson-Stevens
Act to provide U.S. fishing vessels with
a reasonable opportunity to harvest
quotas under relevant international
fishery agreements such as the ICCAT
Convention, which is implemented
domestically pursuant to ATCA.
Under § 635.28(a)(1), NMFS files a
closure notice with the Office of the
Federal Register for publication when a
BFT quota (or subquota) is reached or is
projected to be reached. Retaining,
possessing, or landing BFT under that
quota category is prohibited on and after
the effective date and time of a closure
notice for that category, for the
remainder of the fishing year, until the
opening of the subsequent quota period
or until such date as specified.
The 2022 baseline quota for the
General category is 555.7 mt. The
General category baseline subquota for
the January through March time period
is 29.5 mt. As a result of two
adjustments, the adjusted subquota for
the January through March time period
is 75 mt (86 FR 72857, December 23,
2021; 87 FR 5737, February 2, 2022).
Closure of the January Through March
2022 General Category Fishery
As of February 10, 2022, reported
landings for the General category
January through March subquota time
period total approximately 63.1 mt.
Based on these landings data, as well as
average catch rates and anticipated
fishing conditions, NMFS projects the
adjusted January through March 2022
subquota of 75 mt will be reached
shortly. Therefore, retaining, possessing,
or landing large medium or giant (i.e.,
measuring 73 inches (185 cm) curved
fork length or greater) BFT by persons
aboard vessels permitted in the Atlantic
Tunas General category and HMS
Charter/Headboat permitted vessels
(while fishing commercially) must cease
at 11:30 p.m. local time on February 11,
2022. The General category will
automatically reopen June 1, 2022, for
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the June through August 2022 subquota
time period. This action applies to
Atlantic Tunas General category
(commercial) permitted vessels and
HMS Charter/Headboat permitted
vessels with a commercial sale
endorsement when fishing
commercially for BFT and is taken
consistent with the regulations at
§ 635.28(a)(1). The intent of this closure
is to prevent overharvest of the available
January through March subquota.
Fishermen aboard General category
permitted vessels and HMS Charter/
Headboat permitted vessels may catchand-release and tag and release BFT of
all sizes, subject to the requirements of
the catch-and-release and tag-andrelease programs at § 635.26. All BFT
that are released must be handled in a
manner that will maximize their
survival, and without removing the fish
from the water, consistent with
requirements at § 635.21(a)(1). For
additional information on safe handling,
see the ‘‘Careful Catch and Release’’
brochure available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/
outreach-and-education/careful-catchand-release-brochure/.
Monitoring and Reporting
NMFS will continue to monitor the
BFT fisheries closely. Dealers are
required to submit landing reports
within 24 hours of a dealer receiving
BFT. Late reporting by dealers
compromises NMFS’ ability to timely
implement actions such as quota and
retention limit adjustment, as well as
closures, and may result in enforcement
actions. Additionally, and separate from
the dealer reporting requirement,
General and HMS Charter/Headboat
category vessel owners are required to
report the catch of all BFT retained or
discarded dead within 24 hours of the
landing(s) or end of each trip, by
accessing hmspermits.noaa.gov, using
the HMS Catch Reporting app, or calling
(888) 872–8862 (Monday through Friday
from 8 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.).
Classification
NMFS issues this action pursuant to
section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and regulations at 50 CFR part 635
and is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
The Assistant Administrator for
NMFS finds that it is impracticable and
contrary to the public interest to provide
prior notice of, and an opportunity for
public comment on, this action for the
following reasons:
The regulations implementing the
2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments provide for inseason
adjustments and fishery closures to
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8430-8432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03058]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Humanities
45 CFR Part 1173
RIN 3136-AA45
Indemnification of Employees
AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities, National Foundation on
the Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is adopting as
final its proposed policy that permits indemnification of NEH employees
in appropriate circumstances, as determined by the Chairperson of NEH
or the Chairperson's designee, for claims made against NEH employees as
a result of actions taken by them in the scope of their employment.
DATES: This final rule is effective on February 15, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, National Endowment for the
Humanities, 400 7th Street SW, Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202)
606-8322; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 20, 2021, NEH published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (86 FR 71863), requesting public comment
on a proposed rule regarding indemnification of NEH employees. The
agency received
[[Page 8431]]
no comments. Accordingly, NEH is adopting the rule as proposed.
This policy permits, but does not require, NEH to indemnify an
employee who suffers an adverse verdict, judgment, or other monetary
award, provided that the act or omission giving rise to the award
occurred within the scope of the employee's employment, and that such
indemnification is in the interest of NEH, as determined by the
Chairperson or the Chairperson's designee. The policy also permits, but
does not require, NEH to settle a claim brought against an employee in
his or her individual capacity, upon a similar determination by the
Chairperson or the Chairperson's designee. This policy applies to
actions pending against NEH employees as of the effective date and to
actions commenced after that date.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for
review.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have federalism implications. It will not
have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship
between the National Government and the states, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This rulemaking meets the applicable standards set forth in section
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988. Specifically, this
rulemaking is written in clear language designed to help reduce
litigation.
Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal Governments
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175, NEH evaluated this
rulemaking and determined that it will not have any potential effects
on Federally recognized Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 12630, Takings
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rulemaking does
not have significant takings implications. Therefore, a takings
implication assessment is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
This rulemaking will not have a significant adverse impact on a
substantial number of small entities, including small businesses, small
governmental jurisdictions, or certain small not-for-profit
organizations.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not impose an information collection burden
under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This action contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not contain a Federal mandate that will result
in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one
year.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
This rulemaking will not have a significant effect on the human
environment.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking will not be a major rule as defined in section 804
of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This
rulemaking will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, a major increase in costs or prices, significant
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete
with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
E-Government Act of 2002
All information about NEH required to be published in the Federal
Register may be accessed at www.neh.gov. The website
www.regulations.gov contains electronic dockets for NEH's rulemakings
under the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946.
Plain Writing Act of 2010
To ensure this proposed rule speaks in plain and clear language so
that the public can use and understand it, NEH modeled the language of
the proposed rule on the Federal Plain Language Guidelines.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1173
Administrative practice and procedure.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the National Endowment for
the Humanities amends 45 CFR chapter XI subchapter D by adding part
1173 to read as follows:
PART 1173--INDEMNIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES
Sec.
1173.1 Policy on employee indemnification
1173.2 [Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301.
Sec. 1173.1 Policy on employee indemnification.
(a) This part explains when the National Endowment for the
Humanities (NEH) will indemnify you, an employee or a former employee
of NEH, against a verdict, judgment, or other monetary award that a
court or other competent authority renders against you. When NEH
indemnifies you against a verdict, judgment, or other monetary award,
it means that NEH will pay the amounts that the court orders you to
pay.
(b) This part also explains when NEH will settle a claim (also
referred to as compromising a claim) that someone brings or threatens
to bring against you in court or before another competent authority. It
is only in exceptional circumstances that NEH will agree to settle a
claim before a court or other competent authority has entered a
verdict, judgment, or monetary award against you.
(c) In order for NEH to indemnify you or settle a claim:
(1) The verdict, judgment, or monetary award to be paid or the
claim to be settled must relate to something that you did (or failed to
do) within the scope of your employment with NEH; and
(2) The Chairperson of NEH or someone the Chairperson designates
(the Agency Official) must determine, as a matter of discretion, that
indemnifying you or settling the claim would be in the interest of NEH.
(d) If you become aware that someone has made or may make a claim
against you personally as a result of something that you did (or failed
to do) within the scope of your employment, you must immediately notify
the Office of the General Counsel.
(e) To request that NEH indemnify you or settle a claim against
you, you must submit a written request to the Office of the General
Counsel. You must include a copy of the verdict, judgment, monetary
award, or settlement proposal, as appropriate. The Office of the
General Counsel may consult about the matter with your supervisor,
other agency employees, and the Department of Justice.
(f) The Agency Official may waive the requirements of paragraphs
(d) and (e) of this section if it would be in the interest of NEH to do
so.
(g) If the Agency Official determines that NEH will indemnify you
or settle a
[[Page 8432]]
claim on your behalf, NEH's commitment will be subject to the
availability of appropriated funds. The Agency Official may impose
other conditions or limitations on the determination at his or her
discretion.
(h) If the Chairperson requests indemnification or settlement of a
claim, the General Counsel will perform the functions assigned to the
Chairperson under this section with respect to that request.
Sec. 1173.2 [Reserved]
Dated: February 9, 2022.
Samuel Roth,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2022-03058 Filed 2-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P