Bacillus paralicheniformis Strain CH2970; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 7953-7955 [2022-02905]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: February 4, 2022. Edward Messina, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR chapter I as follows: PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. Add § 180.1388 to subpart D to read as follows: ■ § 180.1388 Bacillus subtilis strain CH3000; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for residues of Bacillus subtilis strain CH3000 in or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. [FR Doc. 2022–02907 Filed 2–10–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0737; FRL–9094–01– OCSPP] Bacillus paralicheniformis Strain CH2970; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0737, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305–5805. Due to the public health concerns related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Public Reading Room are closed to visitors with limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; main telephone number: (703) 305–7090; email address: BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. I. General Information This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 in or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. Chr. Hansens Laboratory Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document AGENCY: SUMMARY: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 under FFDCA when used in accordance with this exemption. DATES: This regulation is effective February 11, 2022. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before April 12, 2022 and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:05 Feb 10, 2022 Jkt 256001 A. Does this action apply to me? PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 7953 applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register’s e-CFR site at https:// www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2020–0737 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before April 12, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b), although EPA strongly encourages those interested in submitting objections or a hearing request to submit objections and hearing requests electronically. See Order Urging Electronic Service and Filing (April 10, 2020), https://www.epa.gov/ sites/production/files/2020-05/ documents/2020-04-10_-_order_urging_ electronic_service_and_filing.pdf. At this time, because of the COVID–19 pandemic, the judges and staff of the Office of Administrative Law Judges are working remotely and not able to accept filings or correspondence by courier, personal delivery, or commercial delivery, and the ability to receive filings or correspondence by U.S. Mail is similarly limited. When submitting documents to the U.S. EPA Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ), a person should utilize the OALJ e-filing system at https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/ EAB/EAB-ALJ_upload.nsf. Although EPA’s regulations require submission via U.S. Mail or hand delivery, EPA intends to treat submissions filed via electronic means as properly filed submissions during this time that the Agency continues to maximize telework due to the E:\FR\FM\11FER1.SGM 11FER1 7954 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 pandemic; therefore, EPA believes the preference for submission via electronic means will not be prejudicial. If it is impossible for a person to submit documents electronically or receive service electronically, e.g., the person does not have any access to a computer, the person shall so advise OALJ by contacting the Hearing Clerk at (202) 564–6281. If a person is without access to a computer and must file documents by U.S. Mail, the person shall notify the Hearing Clerk every time it files a document in such a manner. The address for mailing documents is U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Administrative Law Judges, Mail Code 1900R, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460. In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 2020–0737, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/where-sendcomments-epa-dockets. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Background In the Federal Register of March 22, 2021 (86 FR 15162) (FRL–10021–44), EPA issued a notice pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance exemption petition (PP 0F8843) by Chr. Hansens Laboratory Inc., 9015 W Maple St., Milwaukee, WI 53214. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:05 Feb 10, 2022 Jkt 256001 of the fungicide and nematicide Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 in or on all food commodities. That notice referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner Chr. Hansens Laboratory Inc. and available in the docket via https://www.regulations.gov. No comments were received on the notice of filing. III. Final Rule A. EPA’s Safety Determination Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance exemption and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .’’ Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that EPA consider ‘‘available information concerning the cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide’s] . . . residues and other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ EPA evaluated the available toxicological and exposure data on Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 and considered their validity, completeness, and reliability, as well as the relationship of this information to human risk. A full explanation of the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment based on those data can be found within the document entitled ‘‘Human Health Risk Assessment of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 and Bacillus subtilis strain CH3000, New Active Ingredients, in CH2970, CH3000, and CH2970/CH3000 Proposed for Registration and Associated Petitions Requesting Tolerance Exemptions’’ (Bacillus PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 paralicheniformis strain CH2970 and Bacillus subtilis strain CH3000 Human Health Assessment). This document, as well as other relevant information, is available in the docket for this action as described under ADDRESSES. The available data and rationale demonstrated that, with regard to humans, Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 is not toxic, pathogenic, or infective via the pulmonary route of exposure when administered intratracheally at a single dose of 6.3 x 108 colony-forming units per test animal; is not anticipated to be toxic, pathogenic, or infective via the oral route of exposure; and is not anticipated to be toxic or irritating via the dermal route of exposure. Additionally, the acute pulmonary toxicity/pathogenicity study demonstrated a pattern of clearance of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 from the blood, cecum contents, and organs of the test animals. Although there may be minimal dietary exposure to residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 when used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices, there are no risks of human health concern due to the lack of potential for adverse effects. There are no current or proposed uses of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 that would result in nonoccupational exposures. Because there are no threshold levels of concern with the toxicity, pathogenicity, or infectivity of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970, EPA determined that no additional margin of safety is necessary to protect infants and children as part of the qualitative assessment conducted. Based upon its evaluation in the Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 and Bacillus subtilis strain CH3000 Human Health Assessment, which concludes that there are no risks of concern from aggregate exposure to Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970. B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology An analytical method for detecting and measuring pesticide residues is not needed for Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 due to the lack of potential for adverse effects, which supports the establishment of the exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation. E:\FR\FM\11FER1.SGM 11FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations C. Conclusion Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 in or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to EPA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance exemption in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes. As a result, this action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:05 Feb 10, 2022 Jkt 256001 ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require EPA’s consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272 note). V. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: February 4, 2022. Edward Messina, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR chapter I as follows: PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. Add § 180.1389 to subpart D to read as follows: ■ § 180.1389 Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 in or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. [FR Doc. 2022–02905 Filed 2–10–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 7955 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 64 [WC Docket No. 12–375, FCC 21–60; FR ID 70815] Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date. AGENCY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) announces that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved, for a period of three years, an information collection associated with the Commission’s 2021 Inmate Calling Services (ICS) Order, FCC 21–60, in which the Commission, among other actions, expanded its consumer disclosure requirements and added new requirements for providers of calling services for incarcerated people (calling services) that seek waiver of the Commission’s interstate and international rate caps. The Commission also required that calling services providers separately disclose, in connection with international calling services rates, the rate component for terminating calls to each country where that provider terminates international calls. This document is consistent with the 2021 ICS Order, which stated that the Commission would publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date of these rules. DATES: The amendments to 47 CFR 64.6110 and the addition of 47 CFR 64.6120, published July 28, 2021 (86 FR 40682), and delayed indefinitely, are effective on February 11, 2022. This rule is effective February 11, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik Raven-Hansen, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418–1532, or email erik.raven-hansen@ fcc.gov.@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document announces that, on January 24, 2022, OMB approved, for a period of three years, the information collection requirements relating to §§ 64.6110 and 64.6120 of the Commission’s rules, as contained in the Commission’s 2021 ICS Order, FCC 21–60, published at 86 FR 40682 on July 28, 2021. The OMB Control Number is 3060–1222. The Commission publishes this document as an announcement of the effective date of the rules. In the 2021 ICS Order, the Commission directed that § 64.6110 be SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\11FER1.SGM 11FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7953-7955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0737; FRL-9094-01-OCSPP]


Bacillus paralicheniformis Strain CH2970; Exemption From the 
Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 
in or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label 
directions and good agricultural practices. Chr. Hansens Laboratory 
Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum 
permissible level for residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain 
CH2970 under FFDCA when used in accordance with this exemption.

DATES: This regulation is effective February 11, 2022. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 12, 2022 and 
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR 
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0737, is available at 
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection 
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., 
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The 
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA 
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Public Reading Room are closed to visitors 
with limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer 
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status 
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Biopesticides and 
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, 
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register's e-CFR site at 
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0737 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
April 12, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and 
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b), although EPA 
strongly encourages those interested in submitting objections or a 
hearing request to submit objections and hearing requests 
electronically. See Order Urging Electronic Service and Filing (April 
10, 2020), https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-05/documents/2020-04-10_-_order_urging_electronic_service_and_filing.pdf. 
At this time, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the judges and staff of 
the Office of Administrative Law Judges are working remotely and not 
able to accept filings or correspondence by courier, personal delivery, 
or commercial delivery, and the ability to receive filings or 
correspondence by U.S. Mail is similarly limited. When submitting 
documents to the U.S. EPA Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ), a 
person should utilize the OALJ e-filing system at https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/EAB/EAB-ALJ_upload.nsf.
    Although EPA's regulations require submission via U.S. Mail or hand 
delivery, EPA intends to treat submissions filed via electronic means 
as properly filed submissions during this time that the Agency 
continues to maximize telework due to the

[[Page 7954]]

pandemic; therefore, EPA believes the preference for submission via 
electronic means will not be prejudicial. If it is impossible for a 
person to submit documents electronically or receive service 
electronically, e.g., the person does not have any access to a 
computer, the person shall so advise OALJ by contacting the Hearing 
Clerk at (202) 564-6281. If a person is without access to a computer 
and must file documents by U.S. Mail, the person shall notify the 
Hearing Clerk every time it files a document in such a manner. The 
address for mailing documents is U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Administrative Law Judges, Mail Code 1900R, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0737, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background

    In the Federal Register of March 22, 2021 (86 FR 15162) (FRL-10021-
44), EPA issued a notice pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance exemption 
petition (PP 0F8843) by Chr. Hansens Laboratory Inc., 9015 W Maple St., 
Milwaukee, WI 53214. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be 
amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance for residues of the fungicide and nematicide Bacillus 
paralicheniformis strain CH2970 in or on all food commodities. That 
notice referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner 
Chr. Hansens Laboratory Inc. and available in the docket via https://www.regulations.gov. No comments were received on the notice of filing.

III. Final Rule

A. EPA's Safety Determination

    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include 
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in 
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in 
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance exemption and 
to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide 
chemical residue. . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) 
requires that EPA consider ``available information concerning the 
cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . . residues and 
other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA evaluated the available toxicological and exposure data on 
Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 and considered their validity, 
completeness, and reliability, as well as the relationship of this 
information to human risk. A full explanation of the data upon which 
EPA relied and its risk assessment based on those data can be found 
within the document entitled ``Human Health Risk Assessment of Bacillus 
paralicheniformis strain CH2970 and Bacillus subtilis strain CH3000, 
New Active Ingredients, in CH2970, CH3000, and CH2970/CH3000 Proposed 
for Registration and Associated Petitions Requesting Tolerance 
Exemptions'' (Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 and Bacillus 
subtilis strain CH3000 Human Health Assessment). This document, as well 
as other relevant information, is available in the docket for this 
action as described under ADDRESSES.
    The available data and rationale demonstrated that, with regard to 
humans, Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 is not toxic, 
pathogenic, or infective via the pulmonary route of exposure when 
administered intratracheally at a single dose of 6.3 x 10\8\ colony-
forming units per test animal; is not anticipated to be toxic, 
pathogenic, or infective via the oral route of exposure; and is not 
anticipated to be toxic or irritating via the dermal route of exposure. 
Additionally, the acute pulmonary toxicity/pathogenicity study 
demonstrated a pattern of clearance of Bacillus paralicheniformis 
strain CH2970 from the blood, cecum contents, and organs of the test 
animals. Although there may be minimal dietary exposure to residues of 
Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 when used in accordance with 
label directions and good agricultural practices, there are no risks of 
human health concern due to the lack of potential for adverse effects. 
There are no current or proposed uses of Bacillus paralicheniformis 
strain CH2970 that would result in non-occupational exposures. Because 
there are no threshold levels of concern with the toxicity, 
pathogenicity, or infectivity of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain 
CH2970, EPA determined that no additional margin of safety is necessary 
to protect infants and children as part of the qualitative assessment 
conducted. Based upon its evaluation in the Bacillus paralicheniformis 
strain CH2970 and Bacillus subtilis strain CH3000 Human Health 
Assessment, which concludes that there are no risks of concern from 
aggregate exposure to Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970, EPA 
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate 
exposure to residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970.

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method for detecting and measuring pesticide residues 
is not needed for Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 due to the 
lack of potential for adverse effects, which supports the establishment 
of the exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any 
numerical limitation.

[[Page 7955]]

C. Conclusion

    Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is 
established for residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 in 
or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label 
directions and good agricultural practices.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 
408(d) in response to a petition submitted to EPA. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special 
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions 
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance 
exemption in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed 
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
et seq.) do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes. As a result, this 
action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this 
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal 
Governments, on the relationship between the National Government and 
the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the 
Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that 
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 
1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and 
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not 
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as 
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 
1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require EPA's consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

V. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: February 4, 2022.
Edward Messina,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 
40 CFR chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. Add Sec.  180.1389 to subpart D to read as follows:


Sec.  180.1389  Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970; exemption 
from the requirement of a tolerance.

    An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for 
residues of Bacillus paralicheniformis strain CH2970 in or on all food 
commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good 
agricultural practices.

[FR Doc. 2022-02905 Filed 2-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.