Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters, 7770-7774 [2022-02768]
Download as PDF
7770
§ 39.13
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Proposed Rules
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2022–
0097; Project Identifier MCAI–2021–
01115–R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by March 28,
2022.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters
Model EC 155B and EC155B1 helicopters,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 7600, Engine Controls.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of a
discrepancy in the Rotorcraft Flight Manual
(RFM) where the rotorcraft stay-up flying
capabilities for Category B operation were
provided through performance data only, not
as airworthiness limitations that are
dependent upon the number of passengers on
board. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
this discrepancy in the RFM, which could
lead to an incorrect determination of the stayup flying capabilities, possibly resulting in
reduced control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2021–0225, dated
October 8, 2021 (EASA AD 2021–0225).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021–0225
(1) Where EASA AD 2021–0225 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2021–
0225 specifies to ‘‘inform all flight crew and,
thereafter, operate the helicopter
accordingly,’’ this AD does not require those
actions.
(3) This AD does not mandate compliance
with the ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2021–0225.
(4) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2021–
0225 specifies an acceptable compliance
method, replace the text ‘‘which includes
information of equal effect to that presented’’
with ‘‘which includes information identical
to that presented.’’
(5) The action required by paragraphs (1)
and (2) of EASA AD 2021–0225 may be
performed by the owner/operator (pilot)
holding at least a private pilot certificate and
must be entered into the aircraft records
showing compliance with this AD in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
accordance with 14 CFR 43.9(a)(1) through
(4) and 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v). The record
must be maintained as required by 14 CFR
91.417 or 135.439.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
(i) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199,
provided that no passengers are onboard.
[Docket No. FAA–2022–0096; Project
Identifier MCAI–2021–01092–R]
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(k) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2021–0225, contact the
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000;
email: ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet:
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 817–222–5110. This
material may be found in the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2022–0097.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
COS Program Management Section,
Operational Safety Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600 Stewart
Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone:
(516) 228–7330; email: andrea.jimenez@
faa.gov.
Issued on February 4, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–02769 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020–22–01 which applies to all Airbus
Helicopters Model AS332C, AS332C1,
AS332L, and AS332L1 helicopters. AD
2020–22–01 requires inspecting the
affected parts and associated frame
bores for discrepancies, applicable
corrective actions, and reporting certain
information if necessary. Since the FAA
issued AD 2020–22–01, a significant
number of reports were received of
finding corrosion on the affected parts.
This proposed AD would retain the
requirements of AD 2020–22–01, add
recurring inspections, and update the
applicable service information. The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by March 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus Helicopters,
2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX,
75052, telephone: (972) 641–0000; or
(800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or
at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/
services/technical-support.html. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2022–0096; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
NPRM, the European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
COS Program Management Section,
Operational Safety Branch, Compliance
& Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600
Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone (516) 228–7330; email
andrea.jimenez@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD.
Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2022–0096; Project
Identifier MCAI–2021–01092–R’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this
proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Andrea Jimenez,
Aerospace Engineer, COS Program
Management Section, Operational
Safety Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600
Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone (516) 228–7330; email
andrea.jimenez@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2020–22–01,
Amendment 39–21297 (85 FR 69126,
November 2, 2020), (AD 2020–22–01),
for all Airbus Helicopters Model
AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, and
AS332L1 helicopters. AD 2020–22–01
requires, within certain compliance
times specified in the manufacturers
service information, inspecting the
attachment fittings and attachment
screws of the main gearbox (MGB)
suspension bars and their frame bores
for discrepancies and corrective actions
in accordance with the actions specified
in the service information. AD 2020–22–
01 also requires sending certain
information to the manufacturer. AD
2020–22–01 resulted from reports of
corrosion on attachment screws and
fittings fastening the MGB suspension
bars to the fuselage. The FAA issued AD
2020–22–01 to address corrosion on
attachment fittings and attachment
screws for the MGB suspension bars.
AD 2020–22–01 was prompted by
EASA AD 2019–0295, dated December
5, 2019 (EASA AD 2019–0295), issued
by EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, to correct an unsafe condition
for all Airbus Helicopters Model AS 332
C, AS 332 C1, AS 332 L, and AS 332 L1
helicopters, all manufacturer serial
numbers. EASA advised that there were
reports of corrosion on attachment
screws and fittings fastening the rear
MGB suspension bars, right and left
hand sides, to the fuselage, and the
attachment screws and fitting fastening
the front MGB suspension bar to the
fuselage. EASA advised that subsequent
investigation determined that during
maintenance visits of an identified
batch of helicopters between September
2012 and April 2019, application of
compound sealant on MGB suspension
bar attachment screws may not have
been accomplished using the approved
maintenance data. This condition, if not
addressed, could lead to structural
failure of the MGB attachment screws,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7771
resulting in detachment of MGB
suspension bars from the fuselage and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Accordingly, EASA AD 2019–0295
required a one-time inspection of the
affected parts, and depending on
findings, accomplishment of applicable
corrective actions. The compliance
times varied depending on helicopter
configuration.
Actions Since AD 2020–22–01 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2020–22–
01, EASA issued EASA AD 2021–0222,
dated October 6, 2021 (EASA AD 2021–
0222), which supersedes EASA AD
2019–0295. EASA advises a significant
number of reports were received about
corrosion being detected on the affected
parts. EASA also advises Airbus
Helicopters issued updated service
information, which includes
instructions for repetitive inspections.
Accordingly, EASA AD 2021–0222
retains the requirements of EASA AD
2019–0295 and adds repetitive
inspections and updated service
information. Additionally, Airbus
Helicopters advised of a typo in the
applicable service information in the
reference to G.2 of one of the work
cards. Accordingly, the FAA has
identified this typo in the exceptions in
the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by EASA and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the
European Union, EASA has notified the
FAA about the unsafe condition
described in its AD. The FAA is
proposing this AD after evaluating all
known relevant information and
determining that the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No.
AS332–53.02.05, Revision 2, and ASB
No. AS332–53.02.07, Revision 1, both
dated August 19, 2021, which specify
procedures for inspecting the
attachment fittings and attachment
screws of the MGB suspension bars and
their frame bores for discrepancies and
corrective actions. This inspection
includes inspecting the attachment
fittings for corrosion and inspecting the
attachment screws for corrosion and
evidence of sealing compound. The
corrective actions include replacing or
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
7772
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Proposed Rules
repairing corroded parts and replacing
screws that have sealing compound on
them. These documents are distinct
since they apply to different helicopter
models in different configurations.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA also reviewed Airbus
Helicopters ASB No. AS332–53.02.05,
Revision 0, dated April 18, 2019; Airbus
Helicopters ASB No. AS332–53.02.05,
Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020; and
Airbus Helicopters ASB No. AS332–
53.02.07, Revision 0, dated October 21,
2019, which also specify procedures for
inspecting the attachment fittings and
attachment screws of the MGB
suspension bars and their frame bores
for discrepancies and corrective actions.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain all
requirements of AD 2020–22–01. This
proposed AD would add repetitive
inspections and update the applicable
service information. This proposed AD
would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
would affect 10 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. Labor rates are estimated at
$85 per work-hour. Based on these
numbers, the FAA estimates that
operators may incur the following costs
in order to comply with this proposed
AD.
Inspecting each attachment screw and
fitting of the rear MGB suspension bars;
each attachment screw and fitting of the
front MGB suspension bar; and the
frame bores would take about 16 workhours, for an estimated cost of $1,360
per helicopter and $13,600 for the U.S.
fleet per inspection cycle.
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary on-condition
corrective actions that would be
required based on the results of the
inspection. The agency has no way of
determining the number of helicopters
that might need these on-condition
replacements:
If required, replacing an affected
screw, nut, split pin, concave washer,
convex washer, or peel shim would take
a minimal amount of time with a
minimal cost.
If required, replacing an affected MGB
attachment fitting would take about 8
work-hours and parts would cost about
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
$7,000 for an estimated cost of $7,680
per replacement.
If required, reporting any
discrepancies to Airbus Helicopters
would take about 1 work-hour for an
estimated cost of $85 per helicopter.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to a penalty for failure to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of
information is estimated to be
approximately 1 hour per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send
comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden to:
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Federal Aviation
Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177–1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA has determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate
aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
AD 2020–22–01, Amendment 39–21297
(85 FR 69126, November 2, 2020); and
■ b. Adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
■
■
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2022–
0096; Project Identifier MCAI–2021–
01092–R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by March
28, 2022.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2020–22–01,
Amendment 39–21297 (85 FR 69126,
November 2, 2020) (AD 2020–22–01).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters
Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, and
AS332L1 helicopters, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 5340, Fuselage main, attach fittings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of
corrosion on attachment screws and fittings
fastening the main gearbox (MGB)
suspension bars to the fuselage. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address corrosion on
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Proposed Rules
attachment fittings and attachment screws for
the MGB suspension bars. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could lead to
structural failure of the MGB attachment
screws, resulting in detachment of MGB
suspension bars from the fuselage and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Definitions
Affected parts are attachment screws and
fitting(s) fastening the parts identified in
paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.
(1) Rear MGB suspension bars, right and
left sides, to the fuselage.
(2) Front MGB suspension bar to the
fuselage.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(h) Repetitive Inspections
Except as specified in paragraphs (j)(1)
through (10) of this AD: Within the
applicable compliance times identified in
paragraphs (h)(1) or (2) of this AD, inspect
each affected part and its frame bores for
discrepancies, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
3.B.2. through 3.B.2.b.3 of Airbus Helicopters
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS332–
53.02.05, Revision 2, dated August 19, 2021
(ASB AS332–53.02.05 Rev 2); or in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 3.B.2. through
3.B.2.d. of Airbus Helicopters ASB No.
AS332–53.02.07, Revision 1, dated August
19, 2021 (ASB AS332–53.02.07 Rev 1), as
applicable to your model helicopter. For the
purposes of this inspection, a discrepancy
may be indicated by corrosion on the MGB
attachment fitting or by sealing compound on
the attachment screws.
(1) Perform the initial inspection within
the applicable compliance times identified in
the ‘‘Deadlines’’ column of Tables 1 through
4, as applicable, of paragraph 1.E.2,
‘‘Compliance in service,’’ of ASB AS332–
53.02.05 Rev 2, and thereafter, at intervals
not to exceed the compliance time identified
in the ‘‘Periodicity’’ column of Table 1
through 4, as applicable.
(2) Perform the initial inspection within
the applicable compliance times identified in
the ‘‘Deadlines’’ column of Tables 1 and 2,
as applicable, of paragraph 1.E.2,
‘‘Compliance in service,’’ of ASB AS332–
53.02.07 Rev 1, and thereafter, at intervals
not to exceed the compliance time identified
in the ‘‘Periodicity’’ column of Table 1 and
2, as applicable.
(i) Corrective Action
Except as required by paragraphs (j)(7)
through (10) of this AD: If, during any
inspection required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, there is any discrepancy, before further
flight, perform the applicable corrective
action (including replacing or repairing
corroded parts and replacing screws that
have sealing compound on them), in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 3.B.2. through
3.B.2.b.3 of ASB AS332–53.02.05 Rev 2 or in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 3.B.2. through
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
3.B.2.d. of ASB AS332–53.02.07 Rev 1, as
applicable.
(j) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) Where Tables 1 and 3 of ASB AS332–
53.02.05 Rev 2 use the phrase ‘‘receipt of
Revision 0 of this Alert Service Bulletin
issued April 18, 2019,’’ this AD requires
using December 7, 2020 (the effective date of
AD 2020–22–01).
(2) Where Table 1 of ASB AS332–53.02.07
Rev 1 uses the phrase ‘‘receipt of Revision 0
of this Alert Service Bulletin,’’ this AD
requires using December 7, 2020 (the
effective date of AD 2020–22–01).
(3) Where Tables 2 and 4 of ASB AS332–
53.02.05 Rev 2 use the phrase ‘‘receipt of
Revision 2 of this Alert Service Bulletin,’’
this AD requires using the effective date of
this AD.
(4) Where Table 2 of ASB AS332–53.02.07
Rev 1, uses the phrase ‘‘that follow receipt of
Revision 1 of this Alert Service Bulletin,’’
this AD requires using the effective date of
this AD.
(5) Where Tables 2 and 4 of ASB AS332–
53.02.05 Rev 2, and Table 2 of ASB AS332–
53.02.07 Rev 1, specify certain configurations
in the ‘‘Configuration’’ column, this AD
requires compliance for those configurations
as of the effective date of this AD. Note 1 to
paragraph (h)(5): An example for the
exception specified in (h)(5) of this AD is
where a service bulletin specifies, ‘‘3700
flight hours or more since compliance with
this Alert Service Bulletin,’’ use ‘‘3700 flight
hours or more since compliance with this
Alert Service Bulletin as of the effective date
of this AD.’’
(6) Where Tables 1 and 3 of ASB AS332–
53.02.05 Rev 2, and Table 1 of ASB AS332–
53.02.07 Rev 1, specify certain configurations
in the ‘‘Configuration’’ column, this AD
requires compliance for those configurations
as of December 7, 2020 (the effective date of
AD 2020–22–01).
(7) Where the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.B.2.b.3) of ASB
AS332–53.02.05 Rev 2, and the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.B.2.b.2) of ASB AS332–53.02.07 Rev 1
specify performing a check of the condition
of the bores and frames, for this AD for ASB
AS332–53.02.05 Rev 2 replace the text,
‘‘Perform a check of the state of the frame
bores as per paragraph G.2. of the Work Card
53–10–00–402 (MET),’’ with ‘‘Perform a
check of the state of the frame bores as per
paragraph F.2.b.(2) of the Work Card 53–10–
00–402 (MET);’’ and for ASB AS332–53.02.07
Rev 1 replace the text, ‘‘Check the condition
of the bores and the frames using the
endoscope (yy) as per paragraph G.2. of Work
Card 53–10–00–402 (MET),’’ with ‘‘Check the
condition of the bores and the frames using
the endoscope (yy) as per paragraph F.2.b.(2)
of Work Card 53–10–00–402 (MET).’’
(8) Where ASB AS332–53.02.05 Rev 2 and
ASB AS332–53.02.07 Rev 1 specify
discarding parts, you are not required to
discard parts.
(9) Where ASB AS332–53.02.05 Rev 2 and
ASB AS332–53.02.07 Rev 1 specify
contacting Airbus Helicopters for repair
instructions, this AD requires repair done in
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7773
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, General Aviation and Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA; or EASA; or Airbus Helicopters’ EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(10) Where ASB AS332–53.02.05 Rev 2,
and ASB AS332–53.02.07 Rev 1, specify if
sealing compound is present, or if no sealing
compound is present but there is corrosion,
take a photo, place the part in quarantine,
and contact Airbus Helicopters for repair
instructions, this AD requires repair done in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, General Aviation and Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA; or EASA; or Airbus Helicopters’ EASA
DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
This AD does not require taking a photo or
placing the part in quarantine.
(k) Reporting
If, during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, there is any
discrepancy, report the inspection results to
Airbus Helicopters at the applicable time
specified in paragraphs (k)(1) or (2) of this
AD. The report should include the
information specified in Appendix 4.A. of
Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332–53.02.05 Rev
2; or ASB AS332–53.02.07 Rev 1, as
applicable.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Submit the
report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) For helicopters identified in ASB
AS332–53.02.05 Rev 2: This paragraph
provides credit for initial inspections
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Airbus Helicopters ASB
AS332–53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2,
2020, or Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332–
53.02.05, Revision 0, dated April 18, 2019.
(2) For helicopters identified in ASB
AS332–53.02.07 Rev 1: This paragraph
provides credit for initial inspections
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Airbus Helicopters ASB
AS332–53–02.07 Revision 0, dated October
21, 2019.
(m) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199,
provided no passengers are onboard.
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
7774
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (o)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(o) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
COS Program Management Section,
Operational Safety Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600 Stewart
Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone (516) 228–7330; email
andrea.jimenez@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N.
Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX, 75052,
telephone: (972) 641–0000; or (800) 232–
0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at https://
www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/
technical-support.html. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(3) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2021–0222, dated October 6,
2021, for more information. You may view
the EASA AD on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA–
2022–0096.
Issued on February 4, 2022.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–02768 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2022–0092; Project
Identifier MCAI–2020–01428–A]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus)
Model PC–12/47E airplanes. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Feb 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI identifies
the unsafe condition as a batch of
incorrectly sized fuel transfer ejector
nozzles that were installed on Model
PC–12/47E airplanes during production.
This proposed AD would require
removing the affected fuel transfer
ejectors from service and prohibiting
installation of the affected fuel transfer
ejectors. The FAA is proposing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by March 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.,
CH–6371, Stans, Switzerland; phone:
+41 848 24 7 365; email:
techsupport.ch@pilatus-aircraft.com;
website: https://www.pilatusaircraft.com/. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety
Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO
64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222–5110.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2022–0092; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
NPRM, the MCAI, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is
listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, General Aviation &
Rotorcraft Section, International
Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room
301, Kansas City, MO 64106; phone:
(816) 329–4059; email: doug.rudolph@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2022–0092; Project
Identifier MCAI–2020–01428–A’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Doug Rudolph,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, General
Aviation & Rotorcraft Section,
International Validation Branch, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO
64106. Any commentary that the FAA
receives that is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2020–0229, dated October 20, 2020
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition on Pilatus
Model PC–12/47E airplanes with serial
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7770-7774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02768]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2022-0096; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01092-R]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020-22-01 which applies to all Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C,
AS332C1, AS332L, and AS332L1 helicopters. AD 2020-22-01 requires
inspecting the affected parts and associated frame bores for
discrepancies, applicable corrective actions, and reporting certain
information if necessary. Since the FAA issued AD 2020-22-01, a
significant number of reports were received of finding corrosion on the
affected parts. This proposed AD would retain the requirements of AD
2020-22-01, add recurring inspections, and update the applicable
service information. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 28,
2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX, 75052, telephone:
(972) 641-0000; or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.
[[Page 7771]]
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0096; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
COS Program Management Section, Operational Safety Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone (516) 228-7330; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0096; Project
Identifier MCAI-2021-01092-R'' at the beginning of your comments. The
most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date
and may amend this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer, COS Program Management Section,
Operational Safety Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA,
1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (516) 228-
7330; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2020-22-01, Amendment 39-21297 (85 FR 69126,
November 2, 2020), (AD 2020-22-01), for all Airbus Helicopters Model
AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, and AS332L1 helicopters. AD 2020-22-01
requires, within certain compliance times specified in the
manufacturers service information, inspecting the attachment fittings
and attachment screws of the main gearbox (MGB) suspension bars and
their frame bores for discrepancies and corrective actions in
accordance with the actions specified in the service information. AD
2020-22-01 also requires sending certain information to the
manufacturer. AD 2020-22-01 resulted from reports of corrosion on
attachment screws and fittings fastening the MGB suspension bars to the
fuselage. The FAA issued AD 2020-22-01 to address corrosion on
attachment fittings and attachment screws for the MGB suspension bars.
AD 2020-22-01 was prompted by EASA AD 2019-0295, dated December 5,
2019 (EASA AD 2019-0295), issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European Union, to correct an unsafe
condition for all Airbus Helicopters Model AS 332 C, AS 332 C1, AS 332
L, and AS 332 L1 helicopters, all manufacturer serial numbers. EASA
advised that there were reports of corrosion on attachment screws and
fittings fastening the rear MGB suspension bars, right and left hand
sides, to the fuselage, and the attachment screws and fitting fastening
the front MGB suspension bar to the fuselage. EASA advised that
subsequent investigation determined that during maintenance visits of
an identified batch of helicopters between September 2012 and April
2019, application of compound sealant on MGB suspension bar attachment
screws may not have been accomplished using the approved maintenance
data. This condition, if not addressed, could lead to structural
failure of the MGB attachment screws, resulting in detachment of MGB
suspension bars from the fuselage and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Accordingly, EASA AD 2019-0295 required a one-time inspection of
the affected parts, and depending on findings, accomplishment of
applicable corrective actions. The compliance times varied depending on
helicopter configuration.
Actions Since AD 2020-22-01 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2020-22-01, EASA issued EASA AD 2021-0222,
dated October 6, 2021 (EASA AD 2021-0222), which supersedes EASA AD
2019-0295. EASA advises a significant number of reports were received
about corrosion being detected on the affected parts. EASA also advises
Airbus Helicopters issued updated service information, which includes
instructions for repetitive inspections. Accordingly, EASA AD 2021-0222
retains the requirements of EASA AD 2019-0295 and adds repetitive
inspections and updated service information. Additionally, Airbus
Helicopters advised of a typo in the applicable service information in
the reference to G.2 of one of the work cards. Accordingly, the FAA has
identified this typo in the exceptions in the regulatory text of this
proposed AD.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by EASA and are approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA about the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all known relevant information and determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
No. AS332-53.02.05, Revision 2, and ASB No. AS332-53.02.07, Revision 1,
both dated August 19, 2021, which specify procedures for inspecting the
attachment fittings and attachment screws of the MGB suspension bars
and their frame bores for discrepancies and corrective actions. This
inspection includes inspecting the attachment fittings for corrosion
and inspecting the attachment screws for corrosion and evidence of
sealing compound. The corrective actions include replacing or
[[Page 7772]]
repairing corroded parts and replacing screws that have sealing
compound on them. These documents are distinct since they apply to
different helicopter models in different configurations.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA also reviewed Airbus Helicopters ASB No. AS332-53.02.05,
Revision 0, dated April 18, 2019; Airbus Helicopters ASB No. AS332-
53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020; and Airbus Helicopters ASB
No. AS332-53.02.07, Revision 0, dated October 21, 2019, which also
specify procedures for inspecting the attachment fittings and
attachment screws of the MGB suspension bars and their frame bores for
discrepancies and corrective actions.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2020-22-01.
This proposed AD would add repetitive inspections and update the
applicable service information. This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD would affect 10 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. Labor rates are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on
these numbers, the FAA estimates that operators may incur the following
costs in order to comply with this proposed AD.
Inspecting each attachment screw and fitting of the rear MGB
suspension bars; each attachment screw and fitting of the front MGB
suspension bar; and the frame bores would take about 16 work-hours, for
an estimated cost of $1,360 per helicopter and $13,600 for the U.S.
fleet per inspection cycle.
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition corrective actions that would be required based on the
results of the inspection. The agency has no way of determining the
number of helicopters that might need these on-condition replacements:
If required, replacing an affected screw, nut, split pin, concave
washer, convex washer, or peel shim would take a minimal amount of time
with a minimal cost.
If required, replacing an affected MGB attachment fitting would
take about 8 work-hours and parts would cost about $7,000 for an
estimated cost of $7,680 per replacement.
If required, reporting any discrepancies to Airbus Helicopters
would take about 1 work-hour for an estimated cost of $85 per
helicopter.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be
approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden estimate
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA has determined that this proposed AD would not have
federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive AD 2020-22-01, Amendment 39-21297
(85 FR 69126, November 2, 2020); and
0
b. Adding the following new airworthiness directive:
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2022-0096; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-01092-R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by March 28, 2022.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2020-22-01, Amendment 39-21297 (85 FR 69126,
November 2, 2020) (AD 2020-22-01).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C, AS332C1,
AS332L, and AS332L1 helicopters, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 5340, Fuselage main,
attach fittings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of corrosion on attachment
screws and fittings fastening the main gearbox (MGB) suspension bars
to the fuselage. The FAA is issuing this AD to address corrosion on
[[Page 7773]]
attachment fittings and attachment screws for the MGB suspension
bars. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could lead to
structural failure of the MGB attachment screws, resulting in
detachment of MGB suspension bars from the fuselage and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Definitions
Affected parts are attachment screws and fitting(s) fastening
the parts identified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.
(1) Rear MGB suspension bars, right and left sides, to the
fuselage.
(2) Front MGB suspension bar to the fuselage.
(h) Repetitive Inspections
Except as specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (10) of this
AD: Within the applicable compliance times identified in paragraphs
(h)(1) or (2) of this AD, inspect each affected part and its frame
bores for discrepancies, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 3.B.2. through 3.B.2.b.3 of Airbus
Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS332-53.02.05,
Revision 2, dated August 19, 2021 (ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2); or in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 3.B.2.
through 3.B.2.d. of Airbus Helicopters ASB No. AS332-53.02.07,
Revision 1, dated August 19, 2021 (ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1), as
applicable to your model helicopter. For the purposes of this
inspection, a discrepancy may be indicated by corrosion on the MGB
attachment fitting or by sealing compound on the attachment screws.
(1) Perform the initial inspection within the applicable
compliance times identified in the ``Deadlines'' column of Tables 1
through 4, as applicable, of paragraph 1.E.2, ``Compliance in
service,'' of ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2, and thereafter, at intervals
not to exceed the compliance time identified in the ``Periodicity''
column of Table 1 through 4, as applicable.
(2) Perform the initial inspection within the applicable
compliance times identified in the ``Deadlines'' column of Tables 1
and 2, as applicable, of paragraph 1.E.2, ``Compliance in service,''
of ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1, and thereafter, at intervals not to
exceed the compliance time identified in the ``Periodicity'' column
of Table 1 and 2, as applicable.
(i) Corrective Action
Except as required by paragraphs (j)(7) through (10) of this AD:
If, during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD,
there is any discrepancy, before further flight, perform the
applicable corrective action (including replacing or repairing
corroded parts and replacing screws that have sealing compound on
them), in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraphs 3.B.2. through 3.B.2.b.3 of ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2 or
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
3.B.2. through 3.B.2.d. of ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1, as applicable.
(j) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) Where Tables 1 and 3 of ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2 use the
phrase ``receipt of Revision 0 of this Alert Service Bulletin issued
April 18, 2019,'' this AD requires using December 7, 2020 (the
effective date of AD 2020-22-01).
(2) Where Table 1 of ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1 uses the phrase
``receipt of Revision 0 of this Alert Service Bulletin,'' this AD
requires using December 7, 2020 (the effective date of AD 2020-22-
01).
(3) Where Tables 2 and 4 of ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2 use the
phrase ``receipt of Revision 2 of this Alert Service Bulletin,''
this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(4) Where Table 2 of ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1, uses the phrase
``that follow receipt of Revision 1 of this Alert Service
Bulletin,'' this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(5) Where Tables 2 and 4 of ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2, and Table
2 of ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1, specify certain configurations in the
``Configuration'' column, this AD requires compliance for those
configurations as of the effective date of this AD. Note 1 to
paragraph (h)(5): An example for the exception specified in (h)(5)
of this AD is where a service bulletin specifies, ``3700 flight
hours or more since compliance with this Alert Service Bulletin,''
use ``3700 flight hours or more since compliance with this Alert
Service Bulletin as of the effective date of this AD.''
(6) Where Tables 1 and 3 of ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2, and Table
1 of ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1, specify certain configurations in the
``Configuration'' column, this AD requires compliance for those
configurations as of December 7, 2020 (the effective date of AD
2020-22-01).
(7) Where the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.B.2.b.3)
of ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2, and the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraph 3.B.2.b.2) of ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1 specify performing
a check of the condition of the bores and frames, for this AD for
ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2 replace the text, ``Perform a check of the
state of the frame bores as per paragraph G.2. of the Work Card 53-
10-00-402 (MET),'' with ``Perform a check of the state of the frame
bores as per paragraph F.2.b.(2) of the Work Card 53-10-00-402
(MET);'' and for ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1 replace the text, ``Check
the condition of the bores and the frames using the endoscope (yy)
as per paragraph G.2. of Work Card 53-10-00-402 (MET),'' with
``Check the condition of the bores and the frames using the
endoscope (yy) as per paragraph F.2.b.(2) of Work Card 53-10-00-402
(MET).''
(8) Where ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2 and ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1
specify discarding parts, you are not required to discard parts.
(9) Where ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2 and ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1
specify contacting Airbus Helicopters for repair instructions, this
AD requires repair done in accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, General Aviation and Rotorcraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus Helicopters' EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(10) Where ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2, and ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev
1, specify if sealing compound is present, or if no sealing compound
is present but there is corrosion, take a photo, place the part in
quarantine, and contact Airbus Helicopters for repair instructions,
this AD requires repair done in accordance with a method approved by
the Manager, General Aviation and Rotorcraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus Helicopters' EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature. This AD does not require taking a photo or placing the
part in quarantine.
(k) Reporting
If, during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD,
there is any discrepancy, report the inspection results to Airbus
Helicopters at the applicable time specified in paragraphs (k)(1) or
(2) of this AD. The report should include the information specified
in Appendix 4.A. of Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2; or
ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1, as applicable.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) For helicopters identified in ASB AS332-53.02.05 Rev 2: This
paragraph provides credit for initial inspections required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-
53.02.05, Revision 1, dated March 2, 2020, or Airbus Helicopters ASB
AS332-53.02.05, Revision 0, dated April 18, 2019.
(2) For helicopters identified in ASB AS332-53.02.07 Rev 1: This
paragraph provides credit for initial inspections required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Helicopters ASB AS332-53-
02.07 Revision 0, dated October 21, 2019.
(m) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199, provided no passengers are onboard.
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Validation
[[Page 7774]]
Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (o)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(o) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Andrea Jimenez,
Aerospace Engineer, COS Program Management Section, Operational
Safety Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600
Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (516) 228-
7330; email [email protected].
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX, 75052,
telephone: (972) 641-0000; or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or
at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html. You may view this referenced service information at
the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817) 222-
5110.
(3) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2021-0222, dated October 6, 2021,
for more information. You may view the EASA AD on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA-2022-0096.
Issued on February 4, 2022.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-02768 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P