Medical Devices; Cardiovascular Devices; Classification of the Photoplethysmograph Analysis Software for Over-the-Counter Use, 6417-6419 [2022-02358]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
parts 801 and 809 regarding labeling,
have been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is
amended as follows:
PART 866—IMMUNOLOGY AND
MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 866
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 866.1655 to subpart B to read
as follows:
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 866.1655 System for detection of
microorganisms and antimicrobial
resistance using reporter expression.
(a) Identification. A system for
detection of microorganisms and
antimicrobial resistance using reporter
expression is an in vitro diagnostic
device intended for the detection and
identification of live microorganisms
and the detection of associated
antimicrobial drug susceptibility or
resistance in specimens from patients at
risk of colonization or suspected of
infection.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The intended use for the device in
the labeling required under § 809.10 of
this chapter must include a detailed
description of the targets the device
detects, the type of results provided to
the user, the clinical indications
appropriate for test use, and the specific
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Feb 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
population(s) for which the device is
intended.
(2) Any device used for specimen
collection and transport must be FDAcleared, approved, or -classified as
510(k) exempt (standalone or as part of
a test system) for the collection of the
specimen types claimed by this device
and for the maintenance of viability of
the targeted microorganisms;
alternatively, the specimen collection
device must be cleared in a premarket
submission as a part of this device.
(3) The labeling required under
§ 809.10(b) of this chapter must include:
(i) A detailed description of the
device, including reagents, instruments,
ancillary materials, applicable specimen
collection and transport device(s) and
control elements, and a detailed
explanation of the methodology,
including all pre-analytical methods for
handling and processing of specimens
and controls to maintain organism
viability;
(ii) Detailed descriptions of the test
procedure, including the preparation
and maintenance of quality controls and
the interpretation of test results;
(iii) Detailed discussion of the
performance characteristics of the
device for all claimed organisms and
specimen types based on analytical
studies, including evaluation of
analytical sensitivity, inclusivity, crossreactivity, potentially interfering
substances and microorganisms,
contamination, specimen stability,
precision, and reproducibility;
(iv) Detailed discussion of the
performance characteristics of the
device observed in a clinical study
performed on a population that is
consistent with the intended use
population in comparison to the results
obtained by a reference or comparator
method determined to be acceptable by
FDA, for microbial detection,
identification, and antimicrobial
susceptibility testing; and
(v) A limiting statement indicating
that a negative test result does not
preclude colonization or infection with
organisms that do not express detectable
levels of the reporter that is identified
by the device.
(4) Design verification and validation
must include:
(i) A detailed description of the
device, including an explanation of the
technology, hardware, software, and
consumables, as well as an explanation
of the result algorithms and method(s)
of data processing from signal
acquisition to result assignment;
(ii) A detailed description of the
impact of any software, including
software applications and hardware-
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6417
based devices that incorporate software,
on the device’s functions;
(iii) Detailed documentation of the
analytical and clinical studies required
in paragraphs (b)(3)(iii) and (iv) of this
section, including the study protocols
containing descriptions of the test
methods, prescribed methods of data
analysis and acceptance criteria, final
study reports, and data line listings;
(iv) Detailed documentation of quality
control procedures, including an
explanation of how quality control
materials were selected, the
recommended frequency of testing,
methods of control preparation,
acceptance criteria for performance and
the results from quality control testing
performed during the analytical and
clinical studies required under
paragraphs (b)(3)(iii) and (iv) of this
section;
(v) Detailed documentation of studies
performed to establish onboard and inuse reagent stability, including the test
method(s), data analysis plans,
acceptance criteria, final study reports,
and data line listings;
(vi) Detailed documentation of studies
to establish reagent shelf-life for the
assay kit and each applicable specimen
collection and transport device,
including study protocols containing
descriptions of the test method(s), data
analysis plans, and acceptance criteria;
and
(vii) Documentation of an appropriate
end user device training program that
will be offered as part of efforts to assure
appropriate conduct of the assay and to
mitigate the risk associated with false
results, including failure to use the
device correctly or correctly interpret
results.
Dated: January 25, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022–02368 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 870
[Docket No. FDA–2021–N–0913]
Medical Devices; Cardiovascular
Devices; Classification of the
Photoplethysmograph Analysis
Software for Over-the-Counter Use
Food and Drug Administration,
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
6418
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the photoplethysmograph
analysis software for over-the-counter
use into class II (special controls). The
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
photoplethysmograph analysis software
for over-the-counter use’s classification.
We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the
device into class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
We believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices.
DATES: This order is effective February
4, 2022. The classification was
applicable on September 11, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Kozen, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2272, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5813,
Jennifer.Shih@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
photoplethysmograph analysis software
for over-the-counter use as class II
(special controls), which we have
determined will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. In
addition, we believe this action will
enhance patients’ access to beneficial
innovation, in part by placing the device
into a lower device class than the
automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Feb 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification
will enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovation. When FDA
classifies a device into class I or II via
the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see
section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act).
As a result, other device sponsors do not
have to submit a De Novo request or
premarket approval application to
market a substantially equivalent device
(see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
defining ‘‘substantial equivalence’’).
Instead, sponsors can use the lessburdensome 510(k) process, when
necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On August 9, 2018, FDA received
Apple Inc.’s request for De Novo
classification of the Irregular Rhythm
Notification Feature. FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on September 11, 2018,
FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 870.2790.1 We have named the
generic type of device
photoplethysmograph analysis software
for over-the-counter use, and it is
identified as a device that analyzes
photoplethysmograph data and provides
information for identifying irregular
heart rhythms. This device is not
intended to provide a diagnosis.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
1 FDA notes that the ACTION caption for this final
order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final order,’’
rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in December
2019, this editorial change was made to indicate
that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance
with the Office of Federal Register’s (OFR)
interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
6419
TABLE 1—PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPH ANALYSIS SOFTWARE FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER USE RISKS AND MITIGATION
MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Poor quality incoming photoplethysmograph (PPG) signal resulting in
failure to detect irregular heart rhythms.
Misinterpretation and/or over-reliance on device output, leading to:
• Failure to seek treatment despite acute symptoms (e.g., fluttering sensation in the chest, lightheadedness, and irregular
pulse).
• Discontinuing or modifying treatment for chronic heart condition.
False negative resulting in failure to detect irregular heart rhythms and
delay of further evaluation or treatment.
False positive resulting in additional unnecessary medical procedures ..
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Feb 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
Clinical performance testing, Human factors testing, and Labeling.
Human factors testing, and Labeling.
Clinical performance testing; Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis; Non-clinical performance testing; and Labeling.
Clinical performance testing; Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis; Non-clinical performance testing; and Labeling.
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 870
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 870 is
amended as follows:
PART 870—CARDIOVASCULAR
DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 870
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 870.2790 to subpart C to read
as follows:
■
§ 870.2790 Photoplethysmograph analysis
software for over-the-counter use.
(a) Identification. A
photoplethysmograph analysis software
device for over-the-counter use analyzes
photoplethysmograph data and provides
information for identifying irregular
heart rhythms. This device is not
intended to provide a diagnosis.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing must
demonstrate the performance
characteristics of the detection
algorithm under anticipated conditions
of use.
(2) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
Documentation must include a
characterization of the technical
specifications of the software, including
the detection algorithm and its inputs
and outputs.
(3) Non-clinical performance testing
must demonstrate the ability of the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
device to detect adequate
photoplethysmograph signal quality.
(4) Human factors and usability
testing must demonstrate the following:
(i) The user can correctly use the
device based solely on reading the
device labeling; and
(ii) The user can correctly interpret
the device output and understand when
to seek medical care.
(5) Labeling must include:
(i) Hardware platform and operating
system requirements;
(ii) Situations in which the device
may not operate at an expected
performance level;
(iii) A summary of the clinical
performance testing conducted with the
device;
(iv) A description of what the device
measures and outputs to the user; and
(v) Guidance on interpretation of any
results.
Dated: January 26, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022–02358 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA–2021–N–0948]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic
Surgery Devices; Classification of the
Carbon Dioxide Gas Controlled Tissue
Expander
Food and Drug Administration,
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
AGENCY:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the carbon dioxide gas
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6417-6419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02358]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 870
[Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0913]
Medical Devices; Cardiovascular Devices; Classification of the
Photoplethysmograph Analysis Software for Over-the-Counter Use
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 6418]]
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the photoplethysmograph analysis software for over-the-
counter use into class II (special controls). The special controls that
apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part
of the codified language for the photoplethysmograph analysis software
for over-the-counter use's classification. We are taking this action
because we have determined that classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective February 4, 2022. The classification was
applicable on September 11, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Kozen, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2272, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5813,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the photoplethysmograph analysis
software for over-the-counter use as class II (special controls), which
we have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by placing the
device into a lower device class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device
is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of the
procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation. When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the device can serve as a
predicate for future devices of that type, including for 510(k)s (see
section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially equivalent device (see section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead,
sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On August 9, 2018, FDA received Apple Inc.'s request for De Novo
classification of the Irregular Rhythm Notification Feature. FDA
reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the criteria
for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on September 11, 2018, FDA issued an order to the
requester classifying the device into class II. In this final order,
FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
870.2790.\1\ We have named the generic type of device
photoplethysmograph analysis software for over-the-counter use, and it
is identified as a device that analyzes photoplethysmograph data and
provides information for identifying irregular heart rhythms. This
device is not intended to provide a diagnosis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ACTION caption for this final order is
styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
[[Page 6419]]
Table 1--Photoplethysmograph Analysis Software for Over-the-Counter Use
Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor quality incoming Clinical performance testing,
photoplethysmograph (PPG) signal Human factors testing, and
resulting in failure to detect Labeling.
irregular heart rhythms.
Misinterpretation and/or over-reliance Human factors testing, and
on device output, leading to: Labeling.
Failure to seek treatment
despite acute symptoms (e.g.,
fluttering sensation in the chest,
lightheadedness, and irregular
pulse).
Discontinuing or modifying
treatment for chronic heart
condition.
False negative resulting in failure to Clinical performance testing;
detect irregular heart rhythms and Software verification,
delay of further evaluation or validation, and hazard
treatment. analysis; Non-clinical
performance testing; and
Labeling.
False positive resulting in additional Clinical performance testing;
unnecessary medical procedures. Software verification,
validation, and hazard
analysis; Non-clinical
performance testing; and
Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part
820, regarding quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 870
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
870 is amended as follows:
PART 870--CARDIOVASCULAR DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 870 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 870.2790 to subpart C to read as follows:
Sec. 870.2790 Photoplethysmograph analysis software for over-the-
counter use.
(a) Identification. A photoplethysmograph analysis software device
for over-the-counter use analyzes photoplethysmograph data and provides
information for identifying irregular heart rhythms. This device is not
intended to provide a diagnosis.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate the performance
characteristics of the detection algorithm under anticipated conditions
of use.
(2) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be
performed. Documentation must include a characterization of the
technical specifications of the software, including the detection
algorithm and its inputs and outputs.
(3) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate the ability
of the device to detect adequate photoplethysmograph signal quality.
(4) Human factors and usability testing must demonstrate the
following:
(i) The user can correctly use the device based solely on reading
the device labeling; and
(ii) The user can correctly interpret the device output and
understand when to seek medical care.
(5) Labeling must include:
(i) Hardware platform and operating system requirements;
(ii) Situations in which the device may not operate at an expected
performance level;
(iii) A summary of the clinical performance testing conducted with
the device;
(iv) A description of what the device measures and outputs to the
user; and
(v) Guidance on interpretation of any results.
Dated: January 26, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-02358 Filed 2-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P