Eagle Permits; Updated Bald Eagle Population Estimates and Take Limits, 5493-5495 [2022-02040]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices
Application Process
Organizations may submit one
application per application period in
each of the three AFG Program activities
(e.g., one application for Operations and
Safety, one for Vehicle Acquisition,
and/or a separate application to be a
Joint/Regional project host). If an
organization submits more than one
application for any single AFG Program
activity (e.g., two applications for
Operations and Safety, two for Vehicles,
etc.), either intentionally or
unintentionally, both applications may
be disqualified.
Applicants may access the grant
application electronically at https://
go.fema.gov. The application is also
accessible from the U.S. Fire
Administration’s website at https://
www.usfa.fema.gov and the Grants.gov
website at https://www.grants.gov. New
applicants must register and establish a
username and password for secure
access to the grant application. Previous
AFG Program applicants must use their
previously established username and
password.
Applicants are expected to answer
questions about their grant request that
reflect the AFG Program funding
priorities. In addition, each applicant
must complete four separate narratives
for each project or grant activity
requested. Grant applicants will also
provide relevant information about their
organization’s characteristics, call
volume, and existing organizational
capabilities.
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
System for Award Management (SAM)
Per 2 CFR 25.200, all Federal grant
applicants and recipients must register
at https://SAM.gov. SAM is the Federal
Government’s System for Award
Management, and registration is free of
charge. Applicants must maintain
current information in SAM that is
consistent with the data provided in
their AFG Program grant application
and in the Dun & Bradstreet database,
which currently provides the official
unique entity identifier, the Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number. Per 2 CFR 25.205, FEMA may
not make a federal award or make any
financial modifications to an existing
award unless the applicant or grant
recipient has complied with all
applicable DUNS and SAM
requirements. The grant applicant’s
banking information, EIN, organization/
entity name, address and DUNS number
must match the same information
provided in SAM.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jan 31, 2022
Jkt 256001
Criteria Development Panel
Recommendations
If there are any differences between
the published AFG Program guidelines
and the recommendations made by the
CDP, FEMA must explain them and
publish the information in the Federal
Register prior to awarding any grant
under the AFG Program. For FY 2021,
FEMA accepted, and will implement, all
but two of the CDP’s recommendations
for the prioritization of eligible
activities.
Adopted Recommendations for FY 2021
The FY 2021 AFG Program NOFO
contains some changes to definitions,
descriptions, and priority categories.
Changes to the FY 2021 AFG Program
NOFO include:
• Under the PPE Activity:
D Inclusion of pre-scoring emphasis
for this Activity to ensure replacing out
of service and non-compliant PPE is of
high priority. Therefore, the following
PPE priorities and definitions have been
updated:
Æ Increase supply for new hire/
existing firefighters that do not have one
set of turnout gear (PPE) or allocated
seated position Self Contained
Breathing Apparatus (SCBA). This
includes replacing out of service PPE
and SCBA as High Priority.
Æ Replace in-service/in-use/damaged/
unsafe/unrepairable PPE or SCBA to
meet current standard as High Priority.
Æ Replace in-service/in-use/expired/
noncompliant PPE or SCBA to current
standard as High Priority.
Æ Upgrade technology to current
standard as Low Priority.
D Additional considerations for PPE
and SCBA:
Æ The applicant’s call volume has a
lesser impact on scoring and therefore
the final funding decision.
• Under the Equipment Activity:
D The following equipment priorities
and definitions have been updated:
Æ Obtain equipment to achieve
minimum operational and deployment
standards for existing missions as High
Priority.
Æ Replace non-compliant equipment
to current standard as High Priority.
Æ Obtain equipment for new mission
as Medium Priority.
Æ Upgrade technology to current
standard as Low Priority.
• Under Supporting Definitions:
Æ Paid on-call/stipend departments
are added to the definition of
Combination Fire Department.
Æ Firefighting personnel definition is
added.
• Under Modifications to Facility
Activity:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5493
Æ New first-time installation of
exhaust, sprinkler, carbon monoxide
and/or smoke/fire detection systems are
now listed as High Priority, while
replacement or update/upgrade to
existing systems is considered Low
Priority.
• Under Equipment Activity List:
Æ Respirator decontamination system
is added as Medium Priority.
• Under Additions to the
Application:
Æ Question about frequency of live
fire training is added for statistical
purposes only.
Æ Question about self-inflicted
fatalities within the department is
added for statistical purposes only.
Æ Question regarding quantity of
equipped Advanced Life Support
Response vehicles (transport and nontransport) is added.
• Under Allocations and Restrictions
of Available Grant Funds by
Organization Type:
Æ Outline the funding available for
Micro Grants applications.
• Under Application Tips:
Æ Recommendation to consider nonPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
(PFAS) when recipients purchase new
protective gear.
• Under Micro Grants:
Æ Funding allocation for Micro Grants
was updated. Of the 25% allocated to
each of the career, combination, and
volunteer departments, FEMA will aim
to fund no less than 25% of the
allocation for Micro Grants.
Recommendations Not Adopted for FY
2021
• Proposed changes to reduce the size
of the Micro Grant applications were not
adopted for the FY 2021 application
cycle.
• Proposed change that all items that
are PFAS free receiving higher funding
priority was not adopted for the FY
2021 application cycle.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2229.
Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022–02034 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–64–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2020–0138;
FF09M27000–212–FXMB123109EAGLE]
Eagle Permits; Updated Bald Eagle
Population Estimates and Take Limits
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
5494
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices
Notice.
In December 2016, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service, or
we) completed a Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)
wherein we evaluated biological data to
establish maximum take limits for
permits to take bald eagles in each of six
eagle management units in the United
States. In the PEIS, we committed to
reevaluate biological data and reassess
the take limits no less than once every
6 years. This notice is to inform the
public that we have reviewed recent
data and, using updated population and
demographic models, are revising take
limits for bald eagles effective
immediately.
DATES: The maximum allowable take
limits set forth in this document are
effective February 1, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Supplementary documents
for this notice may be obtained from
https://www.regulations.gov in Docket
No. FWS–HQ–MB–2020–0138.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian A. Millsap, National Raptor
Coordinator, Division of Migratory Bird
Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, at 505–559–3963.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
SUMMARY:
Background
Our authority to authorize take of
eagles is derived from the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703–712) and
the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act (hereafter Eagle Act; 16 U.S.C. 668–
668d). The Eagle Act further specifies
that take of eagles may only be
authorized after a finding that the take
is compatible with the preservation of
the bald eagle or the golden eagle.
Through regulations in part 22 of title
50 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), the Service issues eagle take
permits for several specific purposes,
including scientific or Tribal religious
purposes and preventing depredations
on livestock and collisions with
airplanes near airports. However, the
majority of permits the Service issues to
authorize take of eagles are for
incidental take; that is, take that is
associated with, but not the purpose of,
a human activity (50 CFR 22.26). The
definition of ‘‘take’’ under the Eagle Act
includes ‘‘pursue, shoot, shoot at,
poison, wound, kill, capture, trap,
collect, destroy, molest, or disturb’’ (16
U.S.C. 668c; 50 CFR 22.3).
In 2016, we revised the permit
regulations governing eagle incidental
take (81 FR 91494, December 16, 2016).
As part of that rulemaking action, we
completed a biological status
assessment for both bald and golden
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jan 31, 2022
Jkt 256001
eagles and a Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement. These
documents and other supporting
information for the 2016 rule are
available in Docket No. FWS–R9–MB–
2011–0094 at https://
www.regulations.gov. The 2016
rulemaking action and supplementary
documents implemented the following
actions:
(1) Established six eagle management
units (EMUs) for bald eagles—the
Atlantic Flyway, Mississippi Flyway,
Central Flyway, Pacific Flyway north of
40° north latitude, Pacific Flyway south
of 40° north latitude, and Alaska;
(2) Established a bald eagle
management objective of maintaining
stable or increasing breeding
populations in all EMUs, and the
persistence of local populations
throughout the geographic range;
(3) Used the 20th quantiles of the bald
eagle population size estimates for each
EMU for permitting purposes and
presented those values (use of the 20th
quantile of the probability distributions
for the population size estimates was a
policy decision made by the Service in
the 2016 PEIS to conservatively
addresses the uncertainty in the
population size estimates to ensure the
take limits are compatible with the
management objective for bald eagles);
(4) Established a specific take rate for
bald eagles in the Pacific Flyway South
EMU and a general take rate across the
other EMUs that was consistent with the
management objective;
(5) Set take limits in each EMU based
on the appropriate take rate and the
20th quantile of the EMU population
size estimate; and
(6) Established a schedule for
conducting eagle surveys and
committed to updating population size
estimates and, if warranted, take rates
and take limits no less than once every
6 years.
The 2016 status report and PEIS used
bald eagle count data from 2009 to
arrive at a U.S. population estimate of
143,000 bald eagles (20th quantile =
126,000). The schedule established in
the PEIS called for the Service to update
bald-eagle-population size and take
limits in 2022. However, as part of the
2019 settlement agreement for Energy
and Wildlife Action Coalition v.
Department of the Interior et al. (a case
challenging aspects of our authority to
issue eagle permits), the Service agreed
to expedite the next update of the baldeagle-population size and appropriate
take rate. We completed one new survey
of occupied bald eagle nesting territories
in the coterminous United States
(excluding the Pacific Flyway South
EMU, for reasons explained below) in
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2019 and have since completed the
necessary scientific analyses for the
expedited update.
Updated Data and Take Limits
Through this document, we are
providing public notice of the updated
bald eagle population size, take rate,
and take limits used to guide issuance
of bald eagle take permits for all but the
Alaska and Pacific Flyway South bald
eagle EMUs. We did not implement
surveys in Alaska because we did not
have the financial or logistical
resources. In the Pacific Flyway South
EMU bald eagles are relatively scarce
and patchily distributed, making aerial
surveys impractical. Take limits for
these two EMUs will remain as reported
in the 2016 PEIS until we are able to
acquire and conduct separate analyses
of new information from these
populations.
For this update, we implemented
several improvements to the data and
models we use to generate the relevant
demographic, population size, and take
rate estimates. These changes are
discussed in detail in a technical report
that can be obtained from https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket No.
FWS–HQ–MB–2020–0138. In brief, we:
(1) Collaborated with the Cornell
University Laboratory of Ornithology to
use eBird citizen-science information to
improve our estimates of the number of
occupied bald eagle nesting territories.
The Service’s aerial bald eagle nesting
territory survey covers areas of the
coterminous United States that have
high densities of nesting bald eagles, but
these surveys are not efficient in, and
thus are not conducted in, areas where
nests are sparse. However, eBird bald
eagle relative abundance estimates are
available for nearly all areas in the
coterminous United States. For the 2009
bald eagle population size estimate, we
used counts of known bald eagle nests
provided by State fish and wildlife
agencies as a conservative estimate of
the number of occupied bald eagle
nesting territories outside of the areas
covered by the aerial survey. Many
States no longer track bald eagle nests,
however, so this process was not a
viable option for this update. Instead,
Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology and
Service scientists used aerial survey and
eBird relative abundance data from
areas where both data types were
available to develop a model that
accurately predicted bald eagle nest
density from eBird relative abundance
values. We then used this model to
estimate the number of occupied bald
eagle nesting territories in 2019 in the
Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, and
Pacific Flyway North EMUs.
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices
(2) Developed an integrated
population model (IPM) to improve the
precision of our estimates of
demographic rates. IPMs integrate count
data (our estimates of the number of
occupied nesting territories) and data on
survival rates and reproductive rates to
produce more precise estimates of
population size, survival, and fecundity
than would otherwise be possible.
These rates are used to estimate the take
rate consistent with our management
objective and to translate the estimate of
the number of occupied nesting
territories into a total population size
estimate. IPMs also allow for the
estimation of demographic parameters
for which no explicit data are available
in some cases. For bald eagles, one such
parameter is the proportion of adults
that breed, and we were able to obtain
credible estimates of this parameter
from our IPM. This change is important
because it allowed us to account for
adult ‘‘floaters’’ (i.e., adults not settled
on a nesting territory) and thus
accurately estimate the total number of
adult bald eagles in the population. The
IPM provided information on the
proportion of the bald eagle population
that was in each age class, and so
knowing the number of adults allowed
us to estimate numbers for the other age
classes and thus total population size. In
our 2016 eagle status assessment we
independently modeled each relevant
demographic rate, and thus did not take
advantage of the ability to leverage the
information that comes with IPMs.
(3) We updated the bald eagle banding
data used to estimate survival rates in
the IPM to include band recoveries
through 2018.
(4) We updated our model for
determining take rates and limits for
bald eagles based on the new estimates
of relevant demographic parameters
from the IPM. We also added flexibility
to the model to accommodate the type
of density dependence that likely
regulates bald eagle population size.
Our 2019 estimate of bald eagle
population size in the four EMUs is
316,708. However, consistent with the
5495
Service’s decision in the 2016 PEIS, we
use the 20th quantile of the probability
distribution as the relevant value for
management purposes, which is 273,327
bald eagles. Although some of the
increase in the estimates of population
size from 2009 to 2019 can be attributed
to improvements in methods, the
majority of the increase is likely due to
population growth, estimated to be
around 10 percent per year. In the 2016
PEIS, we determined that a take rate of
0.06 was consistent with our
management objective for bald eagles.
Based on updated demographic
information and using a more
appropriate form of the take-limit
model, we have updated our estimate of
the appropriate take rate to 0.09. The
changes in population size and the take
rate result in an annual maximum take
limit in the four EMUs of 15,832 bald
eagles (see table below). Actual
permitted bald eagle take was 490 in
2020, and the higher updated take limits
will not in themselves lead to increased
take.
TABLE—FORMER AND NEW BALD EAGLE POPULATION SIZE AND TAKE LIMITS BY BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT UNIT
2009 Population size
(20th quantile)
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
Bald eagle management unit
2009 Take limit
2019 Population size
(20th quantile)
New take limits
Atlantic Flyway .................................................
Mississippi Flyway ...........................................
Central Flyway .................................................
Pacific Flyway North ........................................
20,387
27,334
1,163
13,296
1,223
1,640
70
798
72,990
137,917
26,253
36,302
4,223
7,986
1,521
2,102
Total ..........................................................
62,180
3,731
273,327
15,832
Despite the improvements we made in
our models and approach, we have not
altered the analytical framework of the
2016 PEIS. Additionally, our update
does not alter any of the policy
decisions made in the PEIS, and there
are no regulatory changes necessary to
implement these new take limits. In the
2016 PEIS we specifically anticipated
these kinds of periodic updates to the
technical information underlying our
analytical framework to account for
changes in population size and
demographic rates that might occur over
time. Thus, these updates represent a
recalibration of the take limits by
applying the same concepts and policy
decisions in the 2016 PEIS to updated
information on the size and
demographic rates of bald eagles in the
relevant EMUs. Because this new
information constitutes only a technical
update of the scientific information in
our 2016 PEIS, we have determined that
the PEIS itself does not need to be
updated or supplemented, nor are any
regulatory changes required to
implement the update. Consequently,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jan 31, 2022
Jkt 256001
these updated maximum allowable take
limits are effective upon publication of
this notice.
Martha Williams,
Principal Deputy Director, Exercising the
Delegated Authority of the Director, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–02040 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[L19900000.PO0000.LLWO320.20X; OMB
Control No. 1004–0025]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Mineral Surveys, Mineral
Patent Applications, Adverse Claims,
Protests, and Contests
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), the Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) proposes to renew an information
collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before March 3,
2022.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for this information
collection request (ICR) should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Elaine Guenaga by
email at eguenaga@blm.gov, or by
telephone at 775–276–0287. Individuals
who are hearing or speech impaired
may call the Federal Relay Service at 1–
800–877–8339 for TTY assistance. You
may also view the ICR at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5493-5495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02040]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2020-0138; FF09M27000-212-FXMB123109EAGLE]
Eagle Permits; Updated Bald Eagle Population Estimates and Take
Limits
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
[[Page 5494]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In December 2016, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service,
or we) completed a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)
wherein we evaluated biological data to establish maximum take limits
for permits to take bald eagles in each of six eagle management units
in the United States. In the PEIS, we committed to reevaluate
biological data and reassess the take limits no less than once every 6
years. This notice is to inform the public that we have reviewed recent
data and, using updated population and demographic models, are revising
take limits for bald eagles effective immediately.
DATES: The maximum allowable take limits set forth in this document are
effective February 1, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Supplementary documents for this notice may be obtained from
https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2020-0138.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian A. Millsap, National Raptor
Coordinator, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, at 505-559-3963.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Our authority to authorize take of eagles is derived from the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712) and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act (hereafter Eagle Act; 16 U.S.C. 668-668d). The
Eagle Act further specifies that take of eagles may only be authorized
after a finding that the take is compatible with the preservation of
the bald eagle or the golden eagle. Through regulations in part 22 of
title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the Service issues
eagle take permits for several specific purposes, including scientific
or Tribal religious purposes and preventing depredations on livestock
and collisions with airplanes near airports. However, the majority of
permits the Service issues to authorize take of eagles are for
incidental take; that is, take that is associated with, but not the
purpose of, a human activity (50 CFR 22.26). The definition of ``take''
under the Eagle Act includes ``pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound,
kill, capture, trap, collect, destroy, molest, or disturb'' (16 U.S.C.
668c; 50 CFR 22.3).
In 2016, we revised the permit regulations governing eagle
incidental take (81 FR 91494, December 16, 2016). As part of that
rulemaking action, we completed a biological status assessment for both
bald and golden eagles and a Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement. These documents and other supporting information for the
2016 rule are available in Docket No. FWS-R9-MB-2011-0094 at https://www.regulations.gov. The 2016 rulemaking action and supplementary
documents implemented the following actions:
(1) Established six eagle management units (EMUs) for bald eagles--
the Atlantic Flyway, Mississippi Flyway, Central Flyway, Pacific Flyway
north of 40[deg] north latitude, Pacific Flyway south of 40[deg] north
latitude, and Alaska;
(2) Established a bald eagle management objective of maintaining
stable or increasing breeding populations in all EMUs, and the
persistence of local populations throughout the geographic range;
(3) Used the 20th quantiles of the bald eagle population size
estimates for each EMU for permitting purposes and presented those
values (use of the 20th quantile of the probability distributions for
the population size estimates was a policy decision made by the Service
in the 2016 PEIS to conservatively addresses the uncertainty in the
population size estimates to ensure the take limits are compatible with
the management objective for bald eagles);
(4) Established a specific take rate for bald eagles in the Pacific
Flyway South EMU and a general take rate across the other EMUs that was
consistent with the management objective;
(5) Set take limits in each EMU based on the appropriate take rate
and the 20th quantile of the EMU population size estimate; and
(6) Established a schedule for conducting eagle surveys and
committed to updating population size estimates and, if warranted, take
rates and take limits no less than once every 6 years.
The 2016 status report and PEIS used bald eagle count data from
2009 to arrive at a U.S. population estimate of 143,000 bald eagles
(20th quantile = 126,000). The schedule established in the PEIS called
for the Service to update bald-eagle-population size and take limits in
2022. However, as part of the 2019 settlement agreement for Energy and
Wildlife Action Coalition v. Department of the Interior et al. (a case
challenging aspects of our authority to issue eagle permits), the
Service agreed to expedite the next update of the bald-eagle-population
size and appropriate take rate. We completed one new survey of occupied
bald eagle nesting territories in the coterminous United States
(excluding the Pacific Flyway South EMU, for reasons explained below)
in 2019 and have since completed the necessary scientific analyses for
the expedited update.
Updated Data and Take Limits
Through this document, we are providing public notice of the
updated bald eagle population size, take rate, and take limits used to
guide issuance of bald eagle take permits for all but the Alaska and
Pacific Flyway South bald eagle EMUs. We did not implement surveys in
Alaska because we did not have the financial or logistical resources.
In the Pacific Flyway South EMU bald eagles are relatively scarce and
patchily distributed, making aerial surveys impractical. Take limits
for these two EMUs will remain as reported in the 2016 PEIS until we
are able to acquire and conduct separate analyses of new information
from these populations.
For this update, we implemented several improvements to the data
and models we use to generate the relevant demographic, population
size, and take rate estimates. These changes are discussed in detail in
a technical report that can be obtained from https://www.regulations.gov
in Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2020-0138. In brief, we:
(1) Collaborated with the Cornell University Laboratory of
Ornithology to use eBird citizen-science information to improve our
estimates of the number of occupied bald eagle nesting territories. The
Service's aerial bald eagle nesting territory survey covers areas of
the coterminous United States that have high densities of nesting bald
eagles, but these surveys are not efficient in, and thus are not
conducted in, areas where nests are sparse. However, eBird bald eagle
relative abundance estimates are available for nearly all areas in the
coterminous United States. For the 2009 bald eagle population size
estimate, we used counts of known bald eagle nests provided by State
fish and wildlife agencies as a conservative estimate of the number of
occupied bald eagle nesting territories outside of the areas covered by
the aerial survey. Many States no longer track bald eagle nests,
however, so this process was not a viable option for this update.
Instead, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology and Service scientists used
aerial survey and eBird relative abundance data from areas where both
data types were available to develop a model that accurately predicted
bald eagle nest density from eBird relative abundance values. We then
used this model to estimate the number of occupied bald eagle nesting
territories in 2019 in the Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, and Pacific
Flyway North EMUs.
[[Page 5495]]
(2) Developed an integrated population model (IPM) to improve the
precision of our estimates of demographic rates. IPMs integrate count
data (our estimates of the number of occupied nesting territories) and
data on survival rates and reproductive rates to produce more precise
estimates of population size, survival, and fecundity than would
otherwise be possible. These rates are used to estimate the take rate
consistent with our management objective and to translate the estimate
of the number of occupied nesting territories into a total population
size estimate. IPMs also allow for the estimation of demographic
parameters for which no explicit data are available in some cases. For
bald eagles, one such parameter is the proportion of adults that breed,
and we were able to obtain credible estimates of this parameter from
our IPM. This change is important because it allowed us to account for
adult ``floaters'' (i.e., adults not settled on a nesting territory)
and thus accurately estimate the total number of adult bald eagles in
the population. The IPM provided information on the proportion of the
bald eagle population that was in each age class, and so knowing the
number of adults allowed us to estimate numbers for the other age
classes and thus total population size. In our 2016 eagle status
assessment we independently modeled each relevant demographic rate, and
thus did not take advantage of the ability to leverage the information
that comes with IPMs.
(3) We updated the bald eagle banding data used to estimate
survival rates in the IPM to include band recoveries through 2018.
(4) We updated our model for determining take rates and limits for
bald eagles based on the new estimates of relevant demographic
parameters from the IPM. We also added flexibility to the model to
accommodate the type of density dependence that likely regulates bald
eagle population size.
Our 2019 estimate of bald eagle population size in the four EMUs is
316,708. However, consistent with the Service's decision in the 2016
PEIS, we use the 20th quantile of the probability distribution as the
relevant value for management purposes, which is 273,327 bald eagles.
Although some of the increase in the estimates of population size from
2009 to 2019 can be attributed to improvements in methods, the majority
of the increase is likely due to population growth, estimated to be
around 10 percent per year. In the 2016 PEIS, we determined that a take
rate of 0.06 was consistent with our management objective for bald
eagles. Based on updated demographic information and using a more
appropriate form of the take-limit model, we have updated our estimate
of the appropriate take rate to 0.09. The changes in population size
and the take rate result in an annual maximum take limit in the four
EMUs of 15,832 bald eagles (see table below). Actual permitted bald
eagle take was 490 in 2020, and the higher updated take limits will not
in themselves lead to increased take.
Table--Former and New Bald Eagle Population Size and Take Limits by Bald Eagle Management Unit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009 Population size 2019 Population size
Bald eagle management unit (20th quantile) 2009 Take limit (20th quantile) New take limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic Flyway................................................. 20,387 1,223 72,990 4,223
Mississippi Flyway.............................................. 27,334 1,640 137,917 7,986
Central Flyway.................................................. 1,163 70 26,253 1,521
Pacific Flyway North............................................ 13,296 798 36,302 2,102
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 62,180 3,731 273,327 15,832
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Despite the improvements we made in our models and approach, we
have not altered the analytical framework of the 2016 PEIS.
Additionally, our update does not alter any of the policy decisions
made in the PEIS, and there are no regulatory changes necessary to
implement these new take limits. In the 2016 PEIS we specifically
anticipated these kinds of periodic updates to the technical
information underlying our analytical framework to account for changes
in population size and demographic rates that might occur over time.
Thus, these updates represent a recalibration of the take limits by
applying the same concepts and policy decisions in the 2016 PEIS to
updated information on the size and demographic rates of bald eagles in
the relevant EMUs. Because this new information constitutes only a
technical update of the scientific information in our 2016 PEIS, we
have determined that the PEIS itself does not need to be updated or
supplemented, nor are any regulatory changes required to implement the
update. Consequently, these updated maximum allowable take limits are
effective upon publication of this notice.
Martha Williams,
Principal Deputy Director, Exercising the Delegated Authority of the
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-02040 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P