Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure and Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Products; Consumer Air Cleaners, 3702-3715 [2022-01035]
Download as PDF
3702
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
application to the smallest regional
production area which is practicable,
consistent with carrying out the
declared policy of the Act, and the
issuance of several marketing orders
applicable to subdivisions of the
production area would not effectively
carry out the declared policy of the Act;
4. Marketing Order 925 as hereby
proposed to be amended prescribes,
insofar as practicable, such different
terms applicable to different parts of the
production area as are necessary to give
due recognition to the differences in the
production and marketing of grapes
produced or packed in the production
area; and
5. All handling of grapes produced or
packed in the production area as
defined in Marketing Order 925 is in the
current of interstate or foreign
commerce or directly burdens,
obstructs, or affects such commerce.
Four of the members and their alternates
shall be producers, or officers or
employees of producers (producer
members). Four of the members and
their alternates shall be handlers, or
officers or employees of handlers
(handler members). One member and
alternate shall be either a producer or
handler, or an officer or employee
thereof. One member and alternate shall
represent the public.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 925.30, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
Order Relative to Handling
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
It is therefore ordered, that on and
after the effective date hereof, all
handling of grapes grown in a
designated area of southeastern
California shall be in conformity to, and
in compliance with, the terms and
conditions of the said Order as hereby
proposed to be amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed
marketing order amending the Order
contained in the proposed rule issued
by the Administrator and published in
the Federal Register (86 FR 44644) on
August 13, 2021, will be and are the
terms and provisions of this order
amending the Order and are set forth in
full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part
925 as follows:
PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A
DESIGNATED AREA OF
SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 925 continues to read as follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 925.20, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 925.20
Establishment and membership.
(a) There is hereby established a
California Desert Grape Committee
consisting of 10 members, each of whom
shall have an alternate who shall have
the same qualifications as the member.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
§ 925.30
Procedure.
(a) Six members of the committee
shall constitute a quorum, including at
a minimum one producer member and
one handler member, and any action of
the committee shall require at least six
concurring votes.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2022–01306 Filed 1–24–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE–2021–BT–STD–0035 and EERE–
2021–TP–0036]
Energy Conservation Program: Test
Procedure and Energy Conservation
Standards for Consumer Products;
Consumer Air Cleaners
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (‘‘DOE’’) is initiating rulemaking
activities to consider potential test
procedure and energy conservation
standards for consumer air cleaners.
Through this request for information
(‘‘RFI’’), DOE seeks data and
information regarding development and
evaluation of a new test procedure that
would be reasonably designed to
produce test results which reflect energy
use during a representative average use
cycle for the product without being
unduly burdensome to conduct.
Additionally, this RFI solicits
information regarding the development
and evaluation of potential new energy
conservation standards for consumer air
cleaners, and whether such standards
would result in significant energy
savings, be technologically feasible and
economically justified. DOE also
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
welcomes written comments from the
public on any subject within the scope
of this document (including those topics
not specifically raised), as well as the
submission of data and other relevant
information.
Written comments and
information are requested and will be
accepted on or before February 24, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Alternatively, interested persons may
submit comments, identified by docket
number EERE–2021–BT–STD–0035 and
EERE–2021–BT–TP–0036, by any of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: to
AirCleaners2021STD0035@ee.doe.gov or
AirCleaners2021TP0036@ee.doe.gov.
Include docket number EERE–2021–BT–
STD–0035 and EERE–2021–BT–TP–
0036 in the subject line of the message.
No telefacsimilies (‘‘faxes’’) will be
accepted. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on this process, see section
IV of this document.
Although DOE has routinely accepted
public comment submissions through a
variety of mechanisms, including postal
mail and hand delivery/courier, the
Department has found it necessary to
make temporary modifications to the
comment submission process in light of
the ongoing Coronavirus disease 2019
(‘‘COVID–19’’) pandemic. DOE is
currently suspending receipt of public
comments via postal mail and hand
delivery/courier. If a commenter finds
that this change poses an undue
hardship, please contact Appliance
Standards Program staff at (202) 586–
1445 to discuss the need for alternative
arrangements. Once the COVID–19
pandemic health emergency is resolved,
DOE anticipates resuming all of its
regular options for public comment
submission, including postal mail and
hand delivery/courier.
Docket: The docket for this activity,
which includes Federal Register
notices, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials, is
available for review at
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information
that is exempt from public disclosure,
may not be publicly available.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
The docket web pages can be found
at: www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE–
2021–BT–TP–0036 and
www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE–
2021–BT–STD–0035. The docket web
page contains instructions on how to
access all documents, including public
comments, in the docket. See section IV
for information on how to submit
comments through
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Stephanie Johnson, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Building Technologies Office, EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–1943. Email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Amelia Whiting, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2588. Email:
Amelia.Whiting@hq.doe.gov.
For further information on how to
submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket,
contact the Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287–
1445 or by email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Statutory Authority
B. Rulemaking History
C. Rulemaking Process for Test Procedure
D. Rulemaking Process for Energy
Conservation Standards
E. Deviation From Appendix A
II. Request for Information and Comments
Pertaining to Potential Test Procedure
A. Scope and Definition
B. Test Procedure for Consumer Air
Cleaners
1. Current Industry Test Procedure
2. Other Test Procedures
C. Metric for Consumer Air Cleaners
III. Request for Information and Comments
Pertaining to Potential Energy
Conservation Standards
A. Market and Technology Assessment
1. Product Classes
2. Technology Assessment
B. Screening Analysis
C. Engineering Analysis
1. Efficiency Analysis
2. Cost Analysis
D. Distribution Channels and Markups
Analysis
E. Energy Use Analysis
1. Consumer Samples and Market
Breakdowns
2. Operating Hours
F. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period
Analyses
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
G. Repair and Maintenance Costs
H. Shipments
I. National Impact Analysis
J. Manufacturer Impact Analysis
IV. Submission of Comments
I. Introduction
Consumer air cleaners are not
currently subject to a DOE test
procedure or energy conservation
standards. On September 16, 2021, DOE
published a notice of proposed
determination (‘‘NOPD’’) in which DOE
tentatively determined that consumer
air cleaners qualify as a ‘‘covered
product’’ under the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act, as amended
(‘‘EPCA’’) 1 (‘‘September 2021 NOPD’’).
86 FR 51629. DOE tentatively
determined in the September 2021
NOPD that coverage of consumer air
cleaners is necessary or appropriate to
carry out the purposes of EPCA, and
that the average U.S. household energy
use for consumer air cleaners is likely
to exceed 100 kilowatt-hours (‘‘kWh’’)
per year. Id.
The following sections discuss DOE’s
authority to establish test procedures
and energy conservation standards for
covered products, relevant background
information regarding DOE’s
consideration of establishing federal
regulations for consumer air cleaners, if
DOE determines such products are
covered products, and a discussion of
DOE’s rulemaking process for test
procedures and energy conservation
standards.
A. Statutory Authority
EPCA authorizes DOE to regulate the
energy efficiency of a number of
consumer products and certain
industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291–
6317) Title III, Part B 2 of EPCA
established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles, which sets forth a
variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency for certain
products, referred to as ‘‘covered
products.’’ 3 In addition to specifying a
list of consumer products that are
covered products, EPCA contains
provisions that enable the Secretary of
Energy to classify additional types of
consumer products as covered products.
To classify a consumer product as a
covered product, the Secretary must
determine that:
(1) Classifying the product as a
covered product is necessary or
1 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the Energy Act
of 2020, Public Law 116–260 (Dec. 27, 2020).
2 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part B was redesignated Part A.
3 The enumerated list of covered products is at 42
U.S.C. 6292(a)(1)–(19).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3703
appropriate to carry out the purposes of
EPCA; and
(2) The average annual per
household 4 energy use by products of
such type is likely to exceed 100 kWh
(or British thermal unit (‘‘Btu’’)
equivalent) per year. (42 U.S.C.
6292(b)(1)) As stated, DOE has
preliminarily determined that consumer
air cleaners are covered products. 86 FR
51629.
The energy conservation program
under EPCA consists essentially of four
parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3)
Federal energy conservation standards,
and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. Relevant provisions of
EPCA include definitions (42 U.S.C.
6291), test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293),
labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294),
energy conservation standards (42
U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to
require information and reports from
manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296).
Federal energy efficiency
requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally
supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing,
labeling, and standards. (42 U.S.C. 6297)
DOE may, however, grant waivers of
Federal preemption for particular State
laws or regulations, in accordance with
the procedures and other provisions of
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d))
The Federal testing requirements
consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must
use as the basis for: (1) Certifying to
DOE that their products comply with
the applicable energy conservation
standards adopted pursuant to EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6295(s)), and (2) making other
representations about the efficiency of
that product (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)).
Similarly, DOE must use these test
procedures to determine whether the
product complies with relevant
4 DOE has defined ‘‘household’’ to mean an entity
consisting of either an individual, a family, or a
group of unrelated individuals, who reside in a
particular housing unit. For the purpose of this
definition:
(1) Group quarters means living quarters that are
occupied by an institutional group of 10 or more
unrelated persons, such as a nursing home, military
barracks, halfway house, college dormitory,
fraternity or sorority house, convent, shelter, jail or
correctional institution.
(2) Housing unit means a house, an apartment, a
group of rooms, or a single room occupied as
separate living quarters, but does not include group
quarters.
(3) Separate living quarters means living quarters:
(i) To which the occupants have access either:
(A) Directly from outside of the building, or
(B) Through a common hall that is accessible to
other living quarters and that does not go through
someone else’s living quarters, and
(ii) Occupied by one or more persons who live
and eat separately from occupant(s) of other living
quarters, if any, in the same building. 10 CFR 430.2.
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
3704
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
standards promulgated under EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6295(s))
In 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth the
criteria and procedures DOE must
follow when prescribing or amending
test procedures for covered products.
Specifically, EPCA provides that DOE
may, in accordance with certain
requirements, prescribe test procedures
for any consumer product classified as
a covered product under section
6292(b). (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(B)) EPCA
requires that any test procedures
prescribed or amended under this
section must be reasonably designed to
produce test results which reflect energy
efficiency, energy use or estimated
annual operating cost of a given type of
covered product during a representative
average use cycle and must not be
unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
In addition, EPCA requires DOE to
amend its test procedures for all covered
products to integrate measures of
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption into the overall energy
efficiency, energy consumption, or other
energy descriptor. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A)) When doing so, DOE
must take into consideration the most
current versions of Standards 62301 and
62087 of the International
Electrotechnical Commission (‘‘IEC’’),
unless the current test procedure
already incorporates the standby mode
and off mode energy consumption, or if
such integration is technically
infeasible. If an integrated test
procedure is technically infeasible, DOE
must prescribe separate standby mode
and off mode energy use test procedures
for the covered product, if a separate
test is technically feasible. (Id.)
If the Secretary determines, on her
own behalf or in response to a petition
by any interested person, that a test
procedure should be prescribed, the
Secretary shall promptly publish in the
Federal Register a proposed test
procedure and afford interested persons
an opportunity to present oral and
written data, views, and arguments with
respect to such a procedure. The
comment period on a proposed rule to
amend a test procedure shall be at least
60 days and no more than 270 days. In
prescribing or amending a test
procedure, the Secretary shall take into
account such information as the
Secretary determines relevant to such
procedure, including technological
developments relating to energy use or
energy efficiency of the type (or class)
of covered products involved. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(2)) In prescribing a new or
amended test procedure, DOE must
follow the statutory criteria of 42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3)–(4), as discussed further in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
section I.C of this document, and follow
the rulemaking procedures set out in 42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(2). Before prescribing
any final test procedure, the Secretary
must publish a proposed test procedure
in the Federal Register, and afford
interested persons an opportunity (of
not less than 60 days’ duration) to
present oral and written data, views,
and arguments on the proposed test
procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)).
Similarly, DOE must follow specific
statutory criteria for prescribing new or
amended standards for covered
products. Following a coverage
determination, DOE may prescribe an
energy conservation standard for any
type (or class) of covered products of a
type specified in section 6292(a)(20) of
EPCA, if the substantive and procedural
requirements of 42 U.S.C. 6295(o) and
(p) are met and the Secretary determines
that: (1) The average per household
energy use within the United States by
products of such type (or class)
exceeded 150 kWh (or its Btu
equivalent) for any 12-month period
ending before such determination; (2)
the aggregate household energy use
within the United States by products of
such type (or class) exceeded
4,200,000,000 kWh (or its Btu
equivalent) for any such 12-month
period; (3) substantial improvement in
the energy efficiency of products of such
type (or class) is technologically
feasible; and (4) the application of a
labeling rule under section 6294 of this
title to such type (or class) is not likely
to be sufficient to induce manufacturers
to produce, and consumers and other
persons to purchase, covered products
of such type (or class) which achieve the
maximum energy efficiency which is
technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(l)(1)) Further, any new or amended
standard for covered products of a type
specified in paragraph (20) of section
6292(a) of this title shall not apply to
products manufactured within 5 years
after the publication of a final rule
establishing such standard. (42 U.S.C.
6295(1)(2)
Further, EPCA requires that any new
or amended energy conservation
standard prescribed by the Secretary be
designed to achieve the maximum
improvement in energy or water
efficiency that is technologically
feasible and economically justified. (42
U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) The Secretary may
not prescribe an amended or new
standard that will not result in
significant conservation of energy, or is
not technologically feasible or
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(3)) DOE must evaluate proposed
new standards against the criteria of 42
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U.S.C. 6295(o), as described further in
section I.D of this document, and follow
the rulemaking procedures set out in 42
U.S.C. 6295(p). DOE is publishing this
RFI consistent with its authority and
these obligations.
B. Rulemaking History
DOE has not previously conducted a
rulemaking for consumer air cleaners.
As stated, DOE tentatively determined
in the September 2021 NOPD that:
Coverage of consumer air cleaners is
necessary or appropriate to carry out the
purposes of EPCA; the average U.S.
household energy use for consumer air
cleaners is likely to exceed 100 kWh per
year; and thus, consumer air cleaners
qualify as a ‘‘covered product’’ under
EPCA. 86 FR 51629. In the September
2021 NOPD, DOE sought comment on:
(1) A proposed definition for consumer
air cleaners; (2) the energy use analysis
conducted in support of the September
2021 NOPD; and (3) additional
information and data to support DOE’s
preliminary determination to classify
consumer air cleaners as a covered
product under EPCA. 86 FR 51629,
51632–51633.
DOE is currently evaluating
comments received from interested
parties in response to the September
2021 NOPD. DOE will address these
comments and publish a final decision
on coverage as a separate notice.
C. Rulemaking Process for Test
Procedure
As stated, EPCA requires that any test
procedure prescribed or amended must
be reasonably designed to produce test
results which reflect energy efficiency,
energy use or estimated annual
operating cost of a particular type of
covered product during a representative
average use cycle and not be unduly
burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3))
DOE will publish a notification in the
Federal Register (e.g., an RFI or notice
of data availability (‘‘NODA’’))
whenever DOE is considering initiation
of a rulemaking to establish or amend a
test procedure. Section 8(a) of the
Process Rule.
As part of such document(s), DOE
will solicit submission of comments,
data, and information on whether DOE
should proceed with the rulemaking.
Potential topics include whether a test
procedure rule would more accurately
measure energy efficiency, energy use,
or estimated annual operating cost of a
product during a representative average
use cycle or period of use without being
unduly burdensome to conduct; or
reduce testing burden. Based on the
information received in response to
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
such request and its own analysis, DOE
will determine whether to proceed with
a rulemaking for a new or amended test
procedure. Section 8(a)(1) and (a)(2) of
the Process Rule.
As detailed throughout this RFI, DOE
is publishing this document seeking
input and data from interested parties to
aid in DOE’s determination whether
(and if so, how) to establish a test
procedure for consumer air cleaners.
D. Rulemaking Process for Energy
Conservation Standards
As stated previously, following a
coverage determination, DOE may
prescribe an energy conservation
standard for any type (or class) of
covered products of a type specified in
section 6292(a)(20) of EPCA, if the
substantive and procedural
requirements in 42 U.S.C. 6295(o) and
(p) are met and the Secretary determines
that: (1) The average per household
energy use within the United States by
products of such type (or class)
exceeded 150 kWh (or its Btu
equivalent) for any 12-month period
ending before such determination; (2)
the aggregate household energy use
within the United States by products of
such type (or class) exceeded
4,200,000,000 kWhs (or its Btu
equivalent) for any such 12-month
period; (3) substantial improvement in
the energy efficiency of products of such
type (or class) is technologically
feasible; and (4) the application of a
labeling rule under section 6294 of this
title to such type (or class) is not likely
to be sufficient to induce manufacturers
to produce, and consumers and other
persons to purchase, covered products
of such type (or class) which achieve the
maximum energy efficiency which is
technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(l)(1)) Further, any new or amended
standard for covered products of a type
specified in paragraph (20) of section
6292(a) of this title shall not apply to
products manufactured within 5 years
after the publication of a final rule
establishing such standard. (42 U.S.C.
6295(1)(2)
DOE must follow specific statutory
criteria for prescribing new or amended
standards for covered products. As
stated, EPCA requires that any new or
amended energy conservation standard
prescribed by the Secretary be designed
to achieve the maximum improvement
in energy (or water efficiency for certain
products specified by EPCA) that is
technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(A)) Furthermore, DOE may
not adopt any standard that would not
result in the significant conservation of
energy. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3))
The significance of energy savings
offered by a new or amended energy
conservation standard cannot be
determined without knowledge of the
specific circumstances surrounding a
given rulemaking.5 For example, the
United States rejoined the Paris
Agreement on February 19, 2021. As
part of that agreement, the United States
has committed to reducing greenhouse
gas (‘‘GHG’’) emissions in order to limit
the rise in mean global temperature. As
such, energy savings that reduce GHG
emission have taken on greater
importance. Additionally, some covered
products and equipment have most of
their energy consumption occur during
periods of peak energy demand. The
impacts of these products on the energy
infrastructure can be more pronounced
than products with relatively constant
demand. In evaluating the significance
of energy savings, DOE considers
differences in primary energy and fullfuel-cycle (‘‘FFC’’) effects for different
covered products and equipment when
determining whether energy savings are
significant. Primary energy and FFC
effects include the energy consumed in
electricity production (depending on
load shape), in distribution and
transmission, and in extracting,
processing, and transporting primary
fuels (i.e., coal, natural gas, petroleum
fuels), and thus present a more complete
picture of the impacts of energy
conservation standards.
Accordingly, DOE evaluates the
significance of energy savings on a caseby-case basis.
To determine whether a standard is
economically justified, EPCA requires
that DOE determine whether the
benefits of the standard exceed its
burdens by considering, to the greatest
extent practicable, the following seven
factors:
(1) The economic impact of the standard
on the manufacturers and consumers of the
affected products;
(2) The savings in operating costs
throughout the estimated average life of the
product compared to any increases in the
initial cost, or maintenance expenses;
(3) The total projected amount of energy
and water (if applicable) savings likely to
result directly from the standard;
(4) Any lessening of the utility or the
performance of the products likely to result
from the standard;
(5) The impact of any lessening of
competition, as determined in writing by the
Attorney General, that is likely to result from
the standard;
(6) The need for national energy and water
conservation; and
(7) Other factors the Secretary considers
relevant.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(I)–(VII))
DOE fulfills these and other
applicable requirements by conducting
a series of analyses throughout the
rulemaking process. Table I.1 shows the
individual analyses that are performed
to satisfy each of the requirements
within EPCA.
TABLE I.1—EPCA REQUIREMENTS AND CORRESPONDING DOE ANALYSIS
EPCA requirement
Corresponding DOE analysis
Significant Energy Savings .......................................................................
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Technological Feasibility ..........................................................................
Economic Justification:
1. Economic Impact on Manufacturers and Consumers ..................
2. Lifetime Operating Cost Savings Compared to Increased Cost
for the Product.
5 See
•
•
•
•
•
•
Shipments Analysis.
National Impact Analysis.
Energy and Water Use Determination.
Market and Technology Assessment.
Screening Analysis.
Engineering Analysis.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Manufacturer Impact Analysis.
Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis.
Life-Cycle Cost Subgroup Analysis.
Shipments Analysis.
Markups for Product Price Determination.
Energy and Water Use Determination.
Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis.
86 FR 70892, 70901 (Dec. 13, 2021).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3705
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
3706
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
TABLE I.1—EPCA REQUIREMENTS AND CORRESPONDING DOE ANALYSIS—Continued
EPCA requirement
Corresponding DOE analysis
3. Total Projected Energy Savings ...................................................
4. Impact on Utility or Performance ..................................................
5. Impact of Any Lessening of Competition ......................................
6. Need for National Energy and Water Conservation .....................
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
7. Other Factors the Secretary Considers Relevant .........................
In determining whether to consider
establishing or amending any energy
conservation standard, DOE’s general
process is to publish one or more
preliminary (i.e., ‘‘pre-NOPR’’)
documents in the Federal Register
intended to gather information on key
issues. Section 6(a)(1) of the Process
Rule. Such document(s) could take
several forms depending upon the
specific proceeding, including a
framework document, RFI, NODA,
preliminary analysis, or advance notice
of proposed rulemaking. Section 6(a)(2)
of the Process Rule. Such document(s)
will be published in the Federal
Register, with any accompanying
documents referenced and posted in the
appropriate docket. Section 6(a)(1) of
the Process Rule.
The pre-NOPR-stage document(s) will
solicit submission of comments, data,
and information on whether DOE
should proceed with the standards
rulemaking, including whether any new
or amended rule would, as EPCA
requires, be economically justified,
technologically feasible, and result in a
significant savings of energy. Section
6(a)(1) of the Process Rule.
DOE will determine whether to
proceed with a rulemaking for a new or
amended energy conservation standard
based on the information received in
response to such request and its own
analysis. Section 6(a)(3) of the Process
Rule.
As detailed throughout this RFI, DOE
is publishing this document seeking
input and data from interested parties to
aid in the development of the technical
analyses on which DOE will ultimately
rely to determine whether (and if so,
how) to establish energy conservation
standards for consumer air cleaners.
E. Deviation From Appendix A
In accordance with Section 3(a) of 10
CFR part 430, subpart C, appendix A,
DOE notes that it is deviating from that
Appendix’s provision that DOE will
publish its final coverage determination
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Shipments Analysis.
National Impact Analysis.
Screening Analysis.
Engineering Analysis.
Manufacturer Impact Analysis.
Shipments Analysis.
National Impact Analysis.
Employment Impact Analysis.
Utility Impact Analysis.
Emissions Analysis.
Monetization of Emission Reductions Benefits.
Regulatory Impact Analysis.
prior to the initiation of any test
procedure or energy conservation
standards rulemaking. 10 CFR part 430,
subpart C, appendix A, section 5(c).
DOE is opting to deviate from this step
because DOE believes that providing an
opportunity for comment on potential
test procedure and energy conservation
standards prior to a final coverage
determination for consumer air cleaners
allows stakeholders an earlier
opportunity to provide comment,
information, and data that may help
inform DOE’s priority setting. DOE also
notes that in the Energy Conservation
Program for Appliance Standards:
Procedures, Interpretations, and Policies
for Consideration in New or Revised
Energy Conservation Standards and Test
Procedures for Consumer Products and
Commercial/Industrial Equipment
NOPR published on July 7, 2021, DOE
proposed to eliminate the requirement
that coverage determination
rulemakings must be finalized prior to
initiation of a test procedure or energy
conservation standard rulemaking. 86
FR 35668, 35672. DOE explained that
the coverage determination, test
procedure, and energy conservation
standard rulemakings are
interdependent and a coverage
determination defines the product/
equipment scope for which DOE can
establish test procedure and energy
conservation standards. It also signals
that inclusion of the consumer product
is necessary to carry out the purpose of
EPCA, i.e., to conserve energy and/or
water. In order to make this
determination, DOE needs to consider
whether a test procedure and energy
conservation standards can be
established for the consumer product. If
DOE cannot develop a test procedure
that measures energy use during a
representative average use cycle and is
not unduly burdensome to conduct (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) or prescribe energy
conservation standards that result in
significant energy savings (42 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6295(o), then making a coverage
determination is not necessary as it will
not result in the conservation of energy.
Thus, it is important that DOE be able
to gather information and provide
stakeholders an opportunity to comment
and provide information and data
pertinent to test procedure and energy
conservation standard rulemakings,
while DOE conducts a coverage
determination rulemaking. Id.
In accordance with Section 3(a) of 10
CFR part 430, subpart C, appendix A,
DOE notes that it is deviating from that
Appendix’s provision requiring a 75-day
comment period for pre-NOPR
rulemaking documents for standards. 10
CFR part 430, subpart C, appendix A,
section 6(d)(2). DOE is opting to deviate
from this step because the 30-day
comment period will allow DOE to
review comments received in response
to this document before finalizing its
coverage determination. It would also
help inform the Department in
prioritizing any potential rulemakings
for air cleaners in light of its other ongoing rulemakings and statutory
requirements. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency’s (‘‘EPA’s’’) ENERGY
STAR® Program (‘‘ENERGY STAR
Program’’) includes consumer air
cleaners. In light of this, DOE expects
that stakeholders have established a
strong understanding of the key
information and issues that would be of
interest to DOE as it considers
developing test procedure and energy
conservation standards for consumer air
cleaners. DOE also expects that test data
are likely readily available from the
ENERGY STAR Program as well as the
Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers’ (‘‘AHAM’s’’) Directory
of Certified Portable Electric Room Air
Cleaners.6
6 See:
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
www.ahamdir.com/room-air-cleaners/.
25JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
II. Request for Information and
Comments Pertaining to Potential Test
Procedure
In the following sections, DOE has
identified a variety of issues on which
it seeks input to assist in its evaluation
of a potential test procedure for
consumer air cleaners, to ensure that
any such test procedure would, as EPCA
requires, be reasonably designed to
produce test results which reflect energy
use during a representative average use
cycle without being unduly burdensome
to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Scope and Definition
Consumer air cleaners are products
designed to remove particulate matter
and other contaminants from the air to
improve indoor air quality. A wide
range of consumer air cleaners are
available on the market, including
tabletop units, units designed for single
rooms or multiple rooms, and wholehome units integrated into a central
heating and/or cooling system.
Consumer air cleaners employ a wide
variety of technologies to remove
particular matter and other
contaminants from the air. They may
include secondary functions, typically
indoor air quality improvement, that
supplement or enhance that primary
function, such as providing air
circulation, humidification, or
dehumidification.
In the September 2021 NOPD, DOE
proposed a definition for ‘‘air cleaner’’
to help inform its proposed scope of
coverage and regulatory definition. 86
FR 51629, 51632. DOE consulted
existing definitions and classifications
of consumer air cleaners developed by
AHAM—the industry trade group for
consumer air cleaners—and the
ENERGY STAR Program, and additional
market research conducted by DOE. Id.
at 86 FR 51631.
AHAM defined ‘‘air cleaner’’ in an
industry standard, it published and
which is certified by American National
Standards Institute (‘‘ANSI’’), to
measure the performance of portable
household electric room air cleaners,
titled ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 Portable
Household Electric Room Air Cleaners
(‘‘ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020’’).7 Section
3.1 of ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 defines
‘‘Portable Household Electric Room Air
Cleaner’’ as ‘‘[a]n electric appliance
with the function of removing
particulate matter from the air and
which can be moved from room to
room.’’
7 ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 available at AHAM
website at www.aham.org/itemdetail?i
productcode=30002&category=padstd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
The ENERGY STAR Program also
establishes a definition for room air
cleaners (also referred to as air
purifiers), in addition to qualification
criteria for an air cleaner to earn the
ENERGY STAR label.8 The current
ENERGY STAR V2.0 Product
Specification 9 defines ‘‘room air
cleaner’’ as ‘‘an electric appliance with
the function of removing particulate
matter from the air and which can be
moved from room to room,’’ consistent
with ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020.
As discussed in the September 2021
NOPD, the definitions in ANSI/AHAM
AC–1–2020 and the ENERGY STAR
V2.0 Product Specification include
specific air cleaning and air purifying
designs and technologies, but are
limited to ‘‘portable’’ air cleaners that
‘‘can be moved from room to room.’’
DOE noted in the September 2021
NOPD that while ANSI/AHAM AC–1–
2020 specifies that the standard is
applicable only to portable air cleaners,
it includes definitions and setup
instructions for air cleaners that include
wall mounting brackets or instructions
to mount the air cleaner integrally to the
wall. 86 FR 51629, 51632. To cover a
more comprehensive range of the
consumer market for air cleaning and
purification, an expanded definition of
a consumer air cleaner may be
appropriate. DOE therefore considered a
modified definition that would include
other consumer air cleaners, such as
those that are mounted on walls and
ceilings, or that are designed for wholehome air cleaning in conjunction with
central heating or air conditioning
systems. 86 FR 51629, 51632. The
proposed definition expands the range
of products to include those that use
technologies that clean the air by
destroying or deactivating
contaminants, including microbes as
well as particulates, from the air
(instead of only removing them). Id. at
86 FR 51632.
DOE proposed in the September 2021
NOPD to define a consumer air cleaner
as a consumer product that:
(1) Is a self-contained, mechanically
encased assembly;
(2) Is powered by single-phase electric
current;
(3) Removes, destroys, or deactivates
particulates and microorganisms from
the air; and
8 See ENERGY STAR website for air purifiers
(cleaners) at www.energystar.gov/products/air_
purifiers_cleaners.
9 See Eligibility Criteria Version 2.0, Rev. April
2021, available at www.energystar.gov/sites/default/
files/ENERGY%20STAR%20
Version%202.0%20Room%20Air%20
Cleaners%20Specification_Rev%20April%202021_
with%20Partner%20Commitments.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3707
(4) Excludes products that destroy or
deactivate particulates and
microorganisms solely by means of
ultraviolet (‘‘UV’’) light without a fan for
air circulation; and
(5) Excludes central air conditioners,
room air conditioners, portable air
conditioners, dehumidifiers, and
furnaces as defined in 10 CFR 430.2. .
86 FR 51629, 51632.
As discussed in the September 2021
NOPD, DOE proposed to exclude from
coverage those consumer products that
purify air solely by means of UV light
without circulating air through the
product using a fan because the energyconsuming component of such products
would be a fluorescent lamp or lightemitting diode designed to emit light in
the UV portion of the electromagnetic
spectrum. 86 FR 51629, 51632.
Accordingly, DOE would classify these
products under EPCA as a type of lamp
(see the definition of ‘‘lamps primarily
designed to produce radiation in the
ultraviolet region of the spectrum’’ and
‘‘light-emitting diode or LED’’ in 10 CFR
430.2), and therefore, did not consider
applying any future consumer air
cleaner requirements to these products.
Id.
DOE continues to evaluate comments
received from interested parties in
response to the proposed definition for
consumer air cleaners in the September
2021 NOPD.
B. Test Procedure for Consumer Air
Cleaners
DOE has examined existing test
methods to measure key performance
characteristics for determining the
energy efficiency of consumer air
cleaners. These performance
characteristics include clean air delivery
rate (‘‘CADR’’), operating (i.e., active)
mode power consumption, and standby
mode power consumption. DOE is
seeking comment on whether the test
methods identified below, could be
used as the basis for a DOE test
procedure for consumer air cleaners. In
particular, DOE is seeking comment on
any modifications to these test methods
that would be needed to test the full
range of products under DOE’s proposed
definition of consumer air cleaner.
1. Current Industry Test Procedure
As discussed, AHAM published
ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 for measuring
the performance of portable household
electric room air cleaners.
Section 3.14 of ANSI/AHAM AC–1–
2020 defines CADR as the metric to
measure an air cleaner’s efficacy in
removing particulate matter from the
air. CADR represents the rate of
particulate reduction in the test
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
3708
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
chamber when the air cleaner is turned
on, minus the rate of ‘‘natural decay’’ 10
when the air cleaner is not running,
multiplied by the volume of the test
chamber (specified as 1,008 cubic feet).
As such, testing an air cleaner requires
conducting two separate tests: A first
test with the air cleaner turned off, and
a second test with the air cleaner turned
on. The CADR value is expressed in
units of cubic feet per minute (‘‘cfm’’).11
Sections 5, 6, and 7 of ANSI/AHAM
AC–1–2020 specify procedures for
measuring air cleaner efficacy using
three different types of particulates
representing three ranges of particulate
matter size: Pollen (5 micrometer
(‘‘mm’’) to 11 mm diameter), dust (0.5 mm
to 3.0 mm diameter), and cigarette smoke
(0.10 mm to 1.0 mm diameter),
respectively.
Section 2 of ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020
indicates that the precision of the test
method is as follows: ± 25 cfm for
pollen CADR; ± 10 cfm for dust CADR;
and ± 10 cfm for cigarette smoke CADR.
Given these levels of precision, ANSI/
AHAM AC–1–2020 is limited to
measuring air cleaners within rated
CADR ranges of 10 to 600 cfm for dust
and cigarette smoke and 25 to 450 cfm
for pollen.
Section 9 of ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020
also includes methods to measure the
air cleaner’s operating power and
standby power usage in Watts (‘‘W’’), as
discussed further in sections II.B.1.a and
II.B.1.b of this document.
All CADR and power testing are
performed in a test chamber with a
controlled environment. Section 4 of
ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 specifies
requirements for electrical power
supply, test chamber ambient
temperature, test chamber air exchange
rate, test chamber particulate
concentrations, and use of a
recirculation fan in the test chamber.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
a. Operating (Active) Mode Testing
ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 specifies
methodologies to obtain consistent
levels of particulate concentration in the
test chamber for each of the three
particulate types. An aerosol generator
10 AHAM defines ‘‘natural decay’’ as the
reduction of particulate matter due to natural
phenomena in the test chamber: Principally
agglomeration [a process in which fine particles
‘‘clump’’ together], surface deposition [a process in
which particles attach to a surface] (including
sedimentation [a process in which particles settle
out of suspension in the air onto a surface due to
gravity]), and air exchange.
11 Although the unit of measurement for CADR is
cfm, ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 explains that CADR
values indicate the performance of an air cleaner as
a complete system and that the metric has no linear
relationship to air movement or to the
characteristics of any particular particle removal
methodology per se.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
disseminates the appropriate particulate
for each test. The method also discusses
using other devices, such as a cigarette
smoke diluter and aerosol spectrometer
to maintain consistent test particulate
levels during the test and to measure the
particle size distribution within the
room air, respectively. For each
particulate, two tests are performed, one
with the air cleaner not operating and
one with it operating. First, to measure
the natural decay of the particulate
under evaluation, the air cleaner is not
operated and the particulates are
distributed within the room at a
specified concentration. Particulate
concentration is measured and averaged
over a period of time prescribed for each
particulate type. In the second test, the
air cleaner is operated at the setting that
results in the maximum particulate
removal rate and the particulate matter
removal is measured using the same
process as in the first test. Particulate
concentration is again measured over a
prescribed period of time, and the rate
of particulate reduction is calculated.
The difference of the rate of particulate
reduction with the air cleaner operating
minus the rate of natural decay with the
air cleaner not operating, multiplied by
the volume of the test chamber,
provides the CADR value for that
particulate type.
Section 9 of ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020
specifies methods for measuring
operating power. The section allows
measuring operating power during the
CADR test for either cigarette smoke or
dust, the duration of each being greater
than 15 minutes, which is enough time
to measure operating power. After the
air cleaner motor has been conditioned
as specified in Section 9.2 of ANSI/
AHAM AC–1–2020, the power
measuring instrument is connected
between the power supply and air
cleaner, and all settings/options are set
at the maximum level. The air cleaner
is operated for 2 minutes without any
power measurements, and then power
consumption is recorded at 1-minute
intervals for 13 minutes (for a total test
time of 15 minutes). Up to three of the
13 data points may be discarded as
anomalous to account for line surges
and other variables. The remaining
power measurements are averaged to
obtain the operating power, in W, of the
air cleaner.
DOE requests comments on whether
ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 provides an
appropriate method to use as the basis
for a Federal test method and for
defining energy conservation standard
levels for consumer air cleaners.
DOE requests comment on the use of
the CADR, as opposed to another metric
such as rate of decay, to characterize
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consumer air cleaner performance. In
particular, DOE requests comment on
whether consumers could find the unit
of measurement of cfm for CADR
confusing and misunderstand it as
referring to the rate of air movement
through the device.
DOE requests comment on whether
the power measurement could vary
based on the particulate test that is used
to measure operating power. If power
measurement varies based on the
particulate test, DOE requests comment
on which particulate test (pollen, dust,
or cigarette smoke) should be used as
the basis for the power measurement in
any Federal test procedure that DOE
may develop. Alternately, DOE requests
comment on whether it should consider
requiring power measurements for each
particulate test and use a simple or
weighted average to determine operating
power.
DOE requests comment on whether it
should consider testing consumer air
cleaners at any other power level in
addition to the maximum power level
required by ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020.
DOE requests comment on whether
ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 could also be
used to test other types of consumer air
cleaners, such as ceiling- mounted
products.
b. Standby Mode Testing
Section 10 of ANSI/AHAM AC–1–
2020 specifies a measurement procedure
for standby mode that is performed as
a separate test from the CADR and
operating power tests. The standby
power test specifies allowable ranges for
three environmental conditions: Air
speed in the room, ambient air
temperature, and voltage supply. As
specified, the standby power test
method may only be used when the
selected mode and measured power
consumption are stable (defined as a
variation of less than 5 percent in
measured power consumption over 5
minutes). When stability is not
achieved, power consumption can be
determined by alternative methods: By
averaging the power readings over a
specified period of time or by recording
the energy consumption over a specified
period and dividing by the total time
period.
To perform the standby mode test, the
air cleaner is connected to the metering
equipment. After the air cleaner has
been allowed to stabilize for at least 5
minutes, the power consumption is
monitored for not less than an
additional 5 minutes. If the power
consumption does not drift by more
than 5 percent (from the maximum
value observed) during the latter 5
minutes, the load is considered stable
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
and the power consumption can be
recorded directly from the instrument at
the end of the latter 5 minute period.
The resulting standby power is reported
in W, rounded to the nearest
hundredths.
The standby mode test method
specified in ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 is
different from that specified in the most
current version of IEC Standard 62301,
Edition 2.0, ‘‘Household electrical
appliances—Measurement of standby
power’’ (‘‘IEC 62301 Ed. 2.0’’), which is
the standard that EPCA directs DOE to
consider when including measurements
of standby mode and off mode energy
use in its test procedures for covered
products, if technically feasible. (42
U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) IEC 62301 Ed. 2.0
provides three methods to measure
standby power, depending on the
characteristics of the power
consumption in standby mode (e.g.,
stable, unstable, cyclic, of a limited
duration, etc.) The three methods are:
the sampling method, the average
reading method, and the direct meter
reading method. The sampling method,
which is the method incorporated by
reference most frequently in DOE test
procedures for other covered products,
specifies that the unit under test must
be operated in standby mode for at least
15 minutes and standby power is
recorded at least once every second. To
determine standby power, the data from
the second two-thirds of the total test
duration is used to determine stability.
If the measured power is less than or
equal to 1 W, stability is established
when a linear regression through all
power readings for the second twothirds of the total period has a slope of
less than 10 milliwatts per hour (‘‘mW/
h’’). If the measured power is greater
than 1 W, stability is established when
a linear regression through all power
readings for the second two-thirds of the
total period has a slope that is less than
1 percent of the measured input power
per hour.
DOE requests comment on the
suitability of the standby power
measurement procedure specified in
ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020, IEC 62301
Ed. 2.0, or any other test method for
measuring standby mode and off mode
energy use of consumer air cleaners, in
light of EPCA’s requirement in 42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A)) for DOE to consider the
most current version of IEC Standard
62301.
2. Other Test Procedures
In addition to ANSI/AHAM AC–1–
2020, DOE is aware of a few other test
methods for air cleaners. DOE has
identified two test methods to measure
how effectively a unit removes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
microorganisms from the air (as
opposed to particles such as smoke,
pollen, and dust). DOE has additionally
identified two other test methods that
measure the effectiveness of removing
particulates from the air, similar to the
ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 testing
standard.
The first of these test methods was
developed by the Center for Engineering
and Environmental Technology at
Research Triangle Institute (‘‘RTI’’),
titled ‘‘Methodology to Perform Clean
Air Delivery Rate Type Determinations
with Microbiological Aerosols’’ 12 (‘‘RTI
Test Method’’). The stated objective of
the RTI Test Method is to determine a
CADR-type measurement for an air
cleaner using microbiological aerosols.
The method is described as a
modification of the ANSI/AHAM AC–1
test method that can be used for
evaluating a wide range of air cleaning
devices. Similar to the ANSI/AHAM
AC–1–2020 test method, the RTI Test
Method requires measuring the natural
decay rate without the air cleaner
operating and the particulate removal
rate while the air cleaner is operating in
a test chamber. The RTI Test Method
has been conducted using mold,
bacteria, and viruses, representing the
primary groups of microorganisms that
a household air cleaner would be
expected to remove in a home.
The second of these test methods was
developed by researchers at Korea
Testing Laboratory (‘‘KTL’’), Dongguk
University, and Biot Korea Inc., titled
‘‘Assessment of air purifier on efficient
removal of airborne bacteria,
Staphylococcus epidermidis, using
single-chamber method’’ 13 (‘‘KTL Test
Method’’). The objective of the KTL Test
Method is to measure an air cleaner’s
efficacy of removing airborne bacteria
from indoor air. Similar to ANSI/AHAM
AC–1–2020 and the RTI Test Method,
the KTL Test Method involves
measuring both a natural decay rate (i.e.,
without the air cleaner operating) and a
particulate decay rate while the air
cleaner is operating in a test chamber.
The output of the KTL Test Method,
unlike ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020 and
the RTI Test Method, which output a
CADR value (with units of cfm), is a
unitless value representing the ratio of
the natural decay rate to the particulate
decay rate.
The third of these test methods is the
ANSI/American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
12 RTI
Test Method available at: doi.org/10.1080/
713834074.
13 KTL Test Method available at:
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-019-78763.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3709
Engineers (‘‘ASHRAE’’) standard 52.2–
2017, titled ‘‘Method of Testing General
Ventilation Air-Cleaning Devices for
Removal Efficiency by Particle Size’’ 14
(‘‘ASHRAE 52.2–2017’’). ASHRAE 52.2–
2017 specifies a test method to evaluate
air cleaner performance as a function of
particle size using an aerosol generator
to introduce standardized amounts of
dust at periodic intervals to simulate
accumulation of particles over the
lifetime of the air cleaner. The standard
measures air cleaner performance based
on the removal efficiency of particles
with 12 defined particle size ranges
between 0.3 and 10 mm in diameter.
Efficiency measurements for each of the
12 particle size ranges are taken at
various dust loads by challenging the
filter with potassium chloride particles.
This test aerosol provides particles over
the entire range of 0.3 to 10 mm required
by the test procedure. The output metric
is the minimum efficiency reporting
value (‘‘MERV’’), that quantifies the
effectiveness of the air cleaner’s
filtration on a 16-point scale.
The fourth testing method is from the
National Research Council Canada
(‘‘NRCC’’). The NRCC’s publication is
titled, ‘‘Method for Testing Portable Air
Cleaner’s’’ 15 (‘‘NRCC Test Method’’).
The NRCC Test Method determines the
air cleaner’s performance by measuring
particle, volatile organic compounds
(‘‘VOCs’’) (including formaldehyde,
toluene, and d-limonene), and ozone
removal. Known quantities of particles
of different sizes, ozone, and the
selected VOCs are introduced in
different tests until a certain established
target concentration is achieved. The
NRCC Test Method provides multiple
suggested procedures for injecting
particles and VOCs into the test
chamber. Once target contaminant
levels in the test chamber have been
achieved, the injection of particles or
VOCs is stopped, and the concentration
decay rate is measured while the air
cleaner is operating. Particle
concentration is recommended to be
measured using either a condensation
particle counter, optical particle
counter, or an aerodynamic particle
sizer. Formaldehyde concentration is
determined using a high-performance
liquid chromatograph technique and
toluene and d-limonene concentrations
are measured using a gas
chromatograph—mass spectrometer
technique. Ozone levels in the chamber
air are determined using an analyzer
14 ASHRAE 52.2–2017 available at: ashrae.org/
File%20Library/Technical%20Resources/COVID19/52_2_2017_COVID-19_20200401.pdf.
15 NRCC Test Method available at: nrcpublications.canada.ca/eng/view/ft/?id=cc1570e053cc-476d-b2ee-3e252d8bd739.
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
3710
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
based on either chemiluminescence or
UV absorption. These results are then
compared to test results without the air
cleaner operating to assess the removal
effectiveness of the unit.
Additionally, in response to the
September 2021 NOPD, AHAM
commented that it was working on an
updated standard to measure the energy
efficiency for room air cleaners, AHAM
AC–7–2021, ‘‘Energy Test Method for
Portable Air Cleaners’’. (Docket No.
EERE–2021–BT–DET–0022, AHAM, No.
13 at p. 1) AHAM has not yet issued this
test method.
DOE requests comment on whether it
should consider any methodology for
measuring the removal efficacy of
microorganisms (i.e., viruses, bacteria,
mold, etc.) from indoor air as part of a
Federal test procedure for consumer air
cleaners.
DOE requests comment on the
suitability of each of the RTI Test
Method and the KTL Test Method for
measuring a consumer air cleaner’s
removal efficacy of microorganisms
from indoor air.
DOE requests comment on the
additional test methods identified in
this section that measure the
performance of consumer air cleaners
using various particulates. In particular,
DOE requests comment on the scope,
methodology, and types of particulates,
pollutants, and/or microorganisms that
are included in each test method.
DOE requests comments on whether
any other test methods have been
developed for consumer air cleaners
that would be relevant to DOE’s
consideration of a Federal test
procedure to measure the energy
efficiency of consumer air cleaners. In
particular, DOE seeks comment on test
methods that could be used to test ‘‘nonportable’’ consumer air cleaners, such as
those that are permanently mounted
(e.g., ceiling-mounted air cleaners) or
that provide whole-home air cleaning in
conjunction with central heating or air
conditioning systems; and test methods
that could be used to measure the
performance of consumer air cleaners
that destroy or deactivate contaminants
from the air instead of removing them.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Metric for Consumer Air Cleaners
As discussed, EPCA requires that any
test procedure prescribed or amended
must be reasonably designed to produce
test results which reflect energy
efficiency, energy use or estimated
annual operating cost of a given type of
covered product during a representative
average use cycle and not be unduly
burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3))
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
In addition, EPCA requires DOE to
amend its test procedure for all covered
products to integrate measures of
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption into the overall energy
efficiency, energy consumption, or other
energy descriptor, taking into
consideration the most current versions
of IEC Standards 62301 and 62087.
There are only two exceptions: If the
current test procedure already
incorporates the standby mode and off
mode energy consumption, or if such
integration is technically infeasible. (42
U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) If an integrated
test procedure is technically infeasible,
DOE must prescribe separate standby
mode and off mode energy use test
procedures for the covered product, if a
separate test is technically feasible. (Id.)
The ENERGY STAR V2.0 Product
Specification 16 for Room Air Cleaners
defines separate ‘‘on mode’’ (i.e., active
mode) and ‘‘partial on mode’’ (i.e.,
standby/off mode) metrics to certify air
cleaners under the ENERGY STAR label.
The on mode criterion is defined in
terms of a minimum ‘‘CADR/W’’ metric.
That metric, in turn, is defined as the
rated smoke CADR measurement
divided by the operating power
consumption measured during the
smoke particle removal test, each of
which is determined in accordance with
ANSI/AHAM AC–1–2020. The partial
on mode criterion is defined in terms of
a maximum wattage level, as
determined in accordance with IEC
Standard 62301.
In accordance with the requirements
of EPCA, DOE would evaluate whether
an integrated test procedure (i.e., a test
procedure that integrates measures of
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption into the overall energy
efficiency descriptor) is technically
feasible. For example, DOE could define
an integrated CADR/W metric in which
the denominator represents a weighted
average of the power consumption
associated with active mode, standby
mode, and off mode, weighted by the
amount of time spent in each mode.
DOE notes that the ENERGY STAR
program assumes 16 active mode hours
per day and 8 inactive mode (i.e.,
standby or off mode) hours per day to
calculate annual energy consumption of
qualifying consumer air cleaners.17
16 See Eligibility Criteria Version 2.0, Rev. April
2021, available at www.energystar.gov/sites/default/
files/ENERGY%20STAR%20
Version%202.0%20Room%20Air%20Cleaners%20
Specification_Rev%20April%202021_
with%20Partner%20Commitments.pdf.
17 The ENERGY STAR online product database
provides a description of the Annual Energy Use
calculation at data.energystar.gov/dataset/ENERGYSTAR-Certified-Room-Air-Cleaners/jmck-i55n/data.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DOE requests comment on the
technical feasibility of integrating
measures of standby mode and off mode
energy consumption into the overall
energy efficiency descriptor (i.e.,
creating an integrated metric) for
consumer air cleaners. In particular,
DOE requests comment on its example
approach of defining an integrated
CADR/W metric, in which the
denominator would represent a
weighted average of the power
consumption associated with active
mode, standby mode, and off mode,
weighted by the amount of time spent
in each mode.
DOE requests comment on consumer
usage of consumer air cleaners, in
particular, the amount of time spent in
active mode, standby mode, and off
mode.
As discussed previously, ANSI/
AHAM AC–1–2020 specifies procedures
for measuring CADR ratings for three
types of particulate matter: Pollen, dust,
and cigarette smoke. Prior to Version 2.0
of the Product Specification for Room
Air Cleaners, the ENERGY STAR
eligibility criteria were based on the
CADR/W metric using the dust particle
removal test. That changed in a draft
version of the V2.0 Product
Specification,18 where EPA described
its understanding that smoke pollutants
can have the greatest health risk for the
general population and that the AHAM
Verification Program for room air
cleaners calculates the appropriate room
size for a given room air cleaner based
on the cigarette smoke CADR
measurement. (See Note box in Section
3.3.1 of the draft.) EPA also stated that
retailers appear to use this calculation to
direct consumers to a specific room air
cleaner. Id. EPA noted that cigarette
smoke has the smallest particle size of
the three pollutants tested to the ANSI/
AHAM AC–1–2015 standard and is
typically the most energy intensive to
remove. Id. For these reasons, and in
consideration of stakeholder feedback,
EPA asserted that cigarette smoke is the
appropriate pollutant to use as the basis
for evaluating the energy efficiency of
room air cleaners. Id.
DOE requests comment on whether
cigarette smoke would be the
appropriate particulate for determining
a CADR rating of air cleaners under a
DOE test procedure, should DOE adopt
a measurement of CADR in a test
procedure for consumer air cleaners. If
cigarette smoke is not the most
appropriate particulate, DOE requests
comment on other particulate(s) that
18 See Draft 1 Version 2.0 specification at
www.energystar.gov/products/spec/room_air_
cleaners_version_2_0_pd.
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
would be more appropriate as the basis
for measurement, including data and
information to support such a
recommendation.
As discussed previously, ANSI/
AHAM AC–1–2020 specifies that it can
be used to test ‘‘portable’’ air cleaners
that ‘‘can be moved from room to
room.’’ 19 These include floor type, table
type, and wall type units. Ceiling type
units are explicitly outside the scope of
that test method. ANSI/AHAM AC–1–
2020 also does not apply to ‘‘nonportable’’ consumer air cleaners, such as
those that are designed for whole-home
air cleaning in conjunction with central
heating or air conditioning systems.
DOE is not aware of test procedures for
these types of units and seeks guidance
on whether the CADR/W efficiency
metric would be appropriate for
characterizing the energy efficiency of
these types of units. DOE also seeks
guidance about consumer air cleaners
that clean the air by destroying or
deactivating particulates and
microorganisms from the air instead of
removing them (for example, a
consumer air cleaner designed to purify
air using UV light or other heat in
combination with a fan to circulate air
through the product). In particular, DOE
seeks input on whether the CADR/W
metric would be appropriate for such
products.
DOE requests comment on whether
the CADR/W efficiency metric would be
appropriate for characterizing the
energy efficiency of consumer air
cleaner units permanently mounted to a
structure.
DOE requests comment on whether
the CADR/W metric would be
appropriate for consumer air cleaners
that clean the air by destroying or
deactivating particulates and
microorganisms from the air instead of
removing them.
DOE requests comment on whether
any other metrics not already discussed
in this RFI would provide a better
measure of energy efficiency or energy
use of consumer air cleaners during a
representative average use cycle or
period of use.
III. Request for Information and
Comments Pertaining to Potential
Energy Conservation Standards
DOE is also publishing this RFI to
collect data and information to inform
its decision, consistent with its
obligations under EPCA, as to whether
the Department should proceed with an
energy conservation standards
19 DOE notes the vague nature of ‘‘can be,’’ which
depends greatly on the abilities of the person or
people involved in attempting to move the item.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
rulemaking. In the following sections,
DOE has identified a variety of issues on
which it seeks input to aid in the
development of the technical and
economic analyses regarding whether
standards for consumer air cleaners may
be warranted.
As stated previously, following a
coverage determination, EPCA outlines
four criteria for prescribing an energy
conservation standard for a newly
covered product. The four criteria are
that: (1) The average per household
domestic energy use by such products
exceeded 150 kWh (or its Btu
equivalent) for any 12-month period
ending before such determination; (2)
the aggregate domestic household
energy use by such product exceeded
4.2 million kWh (or its Btu equivalent)
for any such 12-month period; (3)
substantial improvement in the energy
efficiency of the products is
technologically feasible; and (4)
applying a labeling rule is not likely to
be sufficient to induce manufacturers to
produce, and consumers and other
persons to purchase, products of such
type which achieve the maximum
energy efficiency which is
technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(l)(1))
DOE seeks data and information on
whether the four criteria for prescribing
an energy conservation standard for air
cleaners are met.
DOE seeks comment on whether
energy conservation standards for
consumer air cleaners would be
economically justified, technologically
feasible, and would result in a
significant savings of energy.
A. Market and Technology Assessment
The market and technology
assessment that DOE routinely conducts
when analyzing the impacts of a
potential new or amended energy
conservation standard provides
information about the consumer air
cleaner industry that will be used in
DOE’s analysis throughout the
rulemaking process. DOE uses
qualitative and quantitative information
to characterize the structure of the
industry and market. DOE identifies
manufacturers, estimates market shares
and trends, addresses regulatory and
non-regulatory initiatives intended to
improve energy efficiency or reduce
energy consumption, and explores the
potential for efficiency improvements in
the design and manufacturing of
consumer air cleaners. DOE also reviews
product literature, industry
publications, and company websites.
Additionally, DOE considers conducting
interviews with manufacturers to
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3711
improve its assessment of the market
and available technologies.
For consumer air cleaners, DOE is
interested in understanding the
consumer air cleaner market, the impact
of the current COVID–19 pandemic on
this market, and whether the current
industry trends are a result of the
pandemic or expected to stay long-term.
DOE seeks feedback on how the
COVID–19 pandemic has impacted the
consumer air cleaner market. DOE
requests any available market data or
information on recent consumer
behavior trends for consumer air
cleaners in response to the pandemic.
1. Product Classes
When evaluating and establishing
energy conservation standards, DOE
may divide covered products into
product classes by the type of energy
used, or by capacity or other
performance-related features that justify
a different standard. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q))
In making a determination whether
capacity or another performance-related
feature justifies a different standard,
DOE must consider such factors as the
utility of the feature to the consumer
and other factors DOE deems
appropriate. (Id.) For consumer air
cleaners, DOE may use CADR as a
measurement of capacity.
DOE requests comment on whether
capacity or any other performancerelated features, such as air cleaning
technology (i.e., whether the product
destroys or deactivates contaminants
from the air or removes them), of
consumer air cleaners would justify the
establishment of different product
classes (i.e., would justify different
standards for such classes).
2. Technology Assessment
In analyzing the feasibility of
potential new energy conservation
standards, DOE uses information about
technology options and prototype
designs to help identify technologies
that manufacturers could use to meet
and/or exceed a given energy
conservation standard level under
consideration. In consultation with
interested parties, DOE intends to
develop a list of technologies to
consider in its analysis.
DOE seeks information on
technologies that are used to improve
the energy efficiency of consumer air
cleaners. Specifically, DOE seeks
information on the range of efficiencies
or performance characteristics that are
currently available for each technology
option.
For each technology option suggested
by stakeholders, DOE seeks information
regarding its market adoption, costs, and
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
3712
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
any concerns with incorporating the
technology into products (e.g., impacts
on consumer utility, potential safety
concerns, manufacturing or production
challenges, etc.).
B. Screening Analysis
The purpose of the screening analysis
is to evaluate the technologies that
improve energy efficiency to determine
which technologies will be eliminated
from further consideration and which
will be passed to the engineering
analysis for further consideration.
DOE determines whether to eliminate
certain technology options from further
consideration based on the following
criteria:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(1) Technological feasibility. Technologies
that are not incorporated in commercial
products or in working prototypes will not be
considered further.
(2) Practicability to manufacture, install,
and service. If it is determined that mass
production of a technology in commercial
products and reliable installation and
servicing of the technology could not be
achieved on the scale necessary to serve the
relevant market at the time of the compliance
date of the standard, then that technology
will not be considered further.
(3) Impacts on product utility or product
availability. If a technology is determined to
have significant adverse impact on the utility
of the product to significant subgroups of
consumers, or result in the unavailability of
any covered product type with performance
characteristics (including reliability),
features, sizes, capacities, and volumes that
are substantially the same as products
generally available in the United States at the
time, it will not be considered further.
(4) Adverse impacts on health or safety. If
it is determined that a technology will have
significant adverse impacts on health or
safety, it will not be considered further.
(5) Unique-Pathway Proprietary
Technologies. If a design option utilizes
proprietary technology that represents a
unique pathway to achieving a given
efficiency level, that technology will not be
considered further due to the potential for
monopolistic concerns.
Sections 6(b)(3) and 7(b) of the Process
Rule.
Technology options identified in the
technology assessment are evaluated
against these criteria using DOE
analyses and inputs from interested
parties (e.g., manufacturers, trade
organizations, and energy efficiency
advocates). Technologies that pass
through the screening analysis are
referred to as ‘‘design options’’ in the
engineering analysis. Technology
options that fail to meet one or more of
the five criteria are eliminated from
consideration.
DOE requests feedback on whether
any air cleaner technology options
would be screened out based on the five
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
screening criteria described in this
section. DOE also requests information
on the technologies that would be
screened out and the screening criteria
that would be applicable to each
screened out technology option.
C. Engineering Analysis
The purpose of the engineering
analysis is to establish the relationship
between the efficiency and cost of
consumer air cleaners. There are two
elements to consider in the engineering
analysis: The selection of efficiency
levels to analyze (i.e., the ‘‘efficiency
analysis’’) and the determination of
product cost at each efficiency level
(i.e., the ‘‘cost analysis’’). In determining
the performance of higher-efficiency
products, DOE considers technologies
and design option combinations not
eliminated by the screening analysis.
For each product class, DOE estimates
the baseline cost, as well as the
incremental cost for the product at
efficiency levels above the baseline. The
output of the engineering analysis is a
set of cost-efficiency ‘‘curves’’ that are
used in downstream analyses (i.e., the
life-cycle cost (‘‘LCC’’) analysis, payback
period (‘‘PBP’’) analysis, and the
national impacts analysis (‘‘NIA’’)).
1. Efficiency Analysis
DOE typically uses one of two
approaches to develop energy efficiency
levels for the engineering analysis: (1)
Relying on observed efficiency levels in
the market (i.e., the efficiency-level
approach), or (2) determining the
incremental efficiency improvements
associated with incorporating specific
design options to a baseline model (i.e.,
the design-option approach). Using the
efficiency-level approach, the efficiency
levels established for the analysis are
determined based on the market
distribution of existing products (in
other words, based on the range of
efficiencies and efficiency level
‘‘clusters’’ that already exist on the
market). Using the design option
approach, the efficiency levels
established for the analysis are
determined through detailed
engineering calculations and/or
computer simulations of the efficiency
improvements from implementing
specific design options that have been
identified in the technology assessment.
DOE may also rely on a combination of
these two approaches. For example, the
efficiency-level approach (based on
actual products on the market) may be
extended using the design option
approach to interpolate to define ‘‘gap
fill’’ levels (to bridge large gaps between
other identified efficiency levels) and/or
to extrapolate to the max-tech level
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(particularly in cases where the maxtech level exceeds the maximum
efficiency level currently available on
the market).
For each product class DOE analyzes,
DOE selects a baseline model as a
reference point against which any
changes resulting from new or amended
energy conservation standards can be
measured. The baseline model in each
product class represents the
characteristics of common or typical
products in that class.
DOE requests feedback on appropriate
baseline efficiency levels for DOE to
apply, and the product classes to which
these baseline efficiency levels would
be applicable, in evaluating whether to
establish energy conservation standards
for consumer air cleaners.
As part of DOE’s analysis, the
maximum available efficiency level is
the highest efficiency unit currently
available on the market. DOE defines a
‘‘max-tech’’ efficiency level to represent
the theoretical maximum possible
efficiency if all available design options
are incorporated in a model. In applying
these design options, DOE would only
include those options that are
compatible with each other and that
when combined would represent the
theoretical maximum possible
efficiency. Often, the max-tech
efficiency level is not commercially
available because it is not economically
feasible.
DOE seeks input on identifying the
max-tech efficiency level for consumer
air cleaners. Additionally, for any maxtech efficiency level identified by
stakeholders, DOE also seeks input on
whether such a max-tech efficiency
level would be appropriate and
technologically feasible for potential
consideration as possible energy
conservation standards for consumer air
cleaners, and if not, why not.
DOE seeks feedback on what design
options would be incorporated at a maxtech efficiency level, and the
efficiencies associated with those levels.
As part of this request, DOE also seeks
information as to whether there are
limitations on the use of certain
combinations of design options.
2. Cost Analysis
The cost analysis portion of the
engineering analysis is conducted using
one or a combination of cost
approaches. The selection of cost
approach depends on a suite of factors,
including availability and reliability of
public information, characteristics of
the regulated product, and the
availability and timeliness of
purchasing the product on the market.
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
The cost approaches are summarized as
follows:
• Physical teardowns: Under this
approach, DOE physically dismantles a
commercially available product,
component-by-component, to develop a
detailed bill of materials for the product.
• Catalog teardowns: In lieu of
physically deconstructing a product,
DOE identifies each component using
parts diagrams (available from
manufacturer websites or appliance
repair websites, for example) to develop
the bill of materials for the product.
• Price surveys: If neither a physical
nor catalog teardown is feasible (for
example, for tightly integrated products
such as fluorescent lamps, which are
infeasible to disassemble and for which
parts diagrams are unavailable) or costprohibitive and otherwise impractical
(e.g., large commercial boilers), DOE
conducts price surveys using publicly
available pricing data published on
major online retailer websites and/or by
soliciting prices from distributors and
other commercial channels.
The resulting bill of materials
provides the basis for the manufacturer
production cost (‘‘MPC’’) estimates.
DOE then applies a manufacturer
markup to convert the MPC to
manufacturer selling price (‘‘MSP’’). The
manufacturer markup accounts for costs
such as overhead and profit.
As described at the beginning of this
section, the main outputs of the
engineering analysis are cost-efficiency
relationships that describe the estimated
increases in manufacturer production
cost associated with higher-efficiency
products for the analyzed product
classes.
DOE requests feedback on design
options that manufacturers would use to
increase energy efficiency in consumer
air cleaners above the baseline. This
includes information on the order in
which manufacturers would incorporate
the different technologies to
incrementally improve efficiency of
products. DOE also requests feedback on
whether the increased energy efficiency
would lead to other design changes that
would not occur otherwise. DOE is also
interested in information regarding any
potential impact of design options on a
manufacturer’s ability to incorporate
additional functions or attributes in
response to consumer demand.
DOE also seeks input on the increase
in MPC associated with incorporating
each particular design option. DOE also
requests information on the investments
necessary to incorporate specific design
options, including, but not limited to,
costs related to new or modified tooling
(if any), materials, engineering and
development efforts to implement each
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
design option, and manufacturing/
production impacts.
DOE requests comment on whether
certain design options may not be
applicable to (or incompatible with)
certain types of air cleaners.
D. Distribution Channels and Markups
Analysis
DOE derives customer prices based on
manufacturer markups as discussed, as
well as retailer markups, distributor
markups, contractor markups (where
appropriate), and sales taxes. In deriving
the retailer and distributor markups,
DOE determines the major distribution
channels for product sales, the markup
associated with each party in each
distribution channel, and the existence
and magnitude of differences between
markups for baseline products
(‘‘baseline markups’’) and higherefficiency products (‘‘incremental
markups’’). The identified distribution
channels (i.e., how the products are
distributed from the manufacturer to the
consumer), and estimated relative sales
volumes through each channel are used
in generating end-user price inputs for
the LCC analysis and NIA.
DOE requests data and information on
typical manufacturer markups for
consumer air cleaners (i.e., the markup
applied to the MPC to determine MSP).
DOE requests information on the
existence of any distribution channels
other than the retail outlet distribution
channel that are used to distribute
consumer air cleaners into the market.
E. Energy Use Analysis
As part of the rulemaking process,
DOE conducts an energy use analysis to
identify how consumers use products,
and thereby determine the energy
savings potential of energy efficiency
improvements. The energy use analysis
is meant to represent typical energy
consumption in the field. DOE will base
the energy consumption of consumer air
cleaners on the annual energy
consumption as determined by the DOE
test procedure.
1. Consumer Samples and Market
Breakdowns
To estimate the energy use of
products in field operating conditions,
DOE typically develops consumer
samples that are representative of
installation and operating
characteristics of how such products are
used in the field, as well as distributions
of annual energy use by application and
market segment. In a potential energy
conservation standards rulemaking for
consumer air cleaners, DOE may utilize
the most current version of the
Residential Energy Consumption Survey
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3713
(‘‘RECS’’) published by the U.S. Energy
Information Administration (‘‘EIA’’)
(currently the 2015 RECS) and the most
current version of the Commercial
Building Energy Consumption Survey
(‘‘CBECS) also published by EIA
(currently the 2012 CBECS).
DOE requests data and information
regarding market applications of
consumer air cleaners and how those
are broken down by economic sector
(e.g., residential versus commercial).
2. Operating Hours
One of the key inputs to the energy
use analysis is the number of annual
operating hours of the product.
As discussed, the ENERGY STAR
database 20 assumes that a consumer air
cleaner operates for 16 hours per day
and is inactive for 8 hours per day,
corresponding to 5,840 active mode
hours per year and 2,920 inactive mode
hours annually.
DOE requests data or published
reports on the number of annual
operating hours of consumer air
cleaners. In particular, DOE requests
data or published reports on whether
the annual operating hours may differ
for any of the types of consumer air
cleaners that would be within the scope
of DOE’s proposed definition of
consumer air cleaner.
F. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period
Analyses
DOE conducts the LCC and the
payback period (‘‘PBP’’) analyses to
evaluate the economic effects of
potential energy conservation standards
for consumer air cleaners on individual
customers. The effects of more stringent
energy conservation standards on a
consumer of consumer air cleaners
include changes in operating expenses
(usually decreased) and changes in
purchase prices (usually increased). For
any given efficiency level, DOE
measures the PBP and the change in
LCC relative to an estimated baseline
level. The LCC is the total customer
expense over the life of the product,
consisting of purchase, installation, and
operating costs (expenses for energy use,
maintenance, and repair). Inputs to the
calculation of total installed cost
include the cost of the product—which
includes the MSP, distribution channel
markups, and sales taxes—and
installation costs. Inputs to the
calculation of operating expenses
include annual energy consumption,
energy prices and price projections,
repair and maintenance costs, product
20 See ENERGY STAR database for air cleaners at
https://data.energystar.gov/dataset/ENERGY-STARCertified-Room-Air-Cleaners/jmck-i55n.
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
3714
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lifetimes, discount rates, and the year
that compliance with new and amended
standards is required.
DOE measures savings of potential
standards relative to a ‘‘no-newstandards’’ case that reflects conditions
without new and/or amended standards,
and uses efficiency market shares to
characterize the ‘‘no-new-standards’’
case product mix. By accounting for
consumers who already purchase more
efficient products, DOE avoids
overstating the potential benefits from
potential standards.
DOE requests information on the
current energy efficiency distribution of
consumer air cleaners.
DOE requests data and information on
the installation costs of consumer air
cleaners, and whether those vary by
product class or any other factor
affecting their efficiency.
G. Repair and Maintenance Costs
As noted, inputs to the calculation of
operating expenses include repair and
maintenance costs, among other factors.
DOE requests feedback and data on
whether maintenance costs differ in
comparison to the baseline maintenance
costs for any air cleaner technology
options.
DOE requests information and data on
the frequency of repair, and repair and
maintenance costs of consumer air
cleaners. DOE is also interested in the
market share of consumers who simply
replace the products when they fail as
opposed to repairing them, and factors
that affect whether consumers decide to
repair or replace, such as income,
geographical location, or product
replacement cost and repair costs.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
H. Shipments
DOE develops shipments forecasts of
products to calculate the national
impacts of potential new or amended
energy conservation standards on
energy consumption, net present value
(‘‘NPV’’), and future manufacturer cash
flows. DOE shipments projections are
typically based on available historical
data categorized by product class,
capacity, and energy efficiency. Current
sales estimates allow for a more accurate
model that captures recent trends in the
market.
DOE requests annual sales data (i.e.,
number of shipments) of consumer air
cleaners from 2016 to 2020
disaggregated to the extent possible by
product class, capacity, energy
efficiency level, or any other
differentiating factor used in the
industry. For each class/category, DOE
also requests the fraction of sales that
are ENERGY STAR-qualified.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
To project future shipments for the
residential and commercial sectors, DOE
typically uses, respectively, new
housing starts projections and
floorspace projections from the Annual
Energy Outlook (AEO) as market
drivers.
DOE requests on the market drivers
and saturation trends that would help
project shipments for consumer air
cleaners.
I. National Impact Analysis
The purpose of the NIA is to estimate
the aggregate economic impacts of
potential efficiency standards at the
national level. The NIA assesses the
national energy savings (‘‘NES’’) and the
national NPV of total customer costs
and savings that would be expected to
result from new or amended standards
at specific efficiency levels.
A key component of DOE’s estimates
of NES and NPV is the equipment
energy efficiencies forecasted over time
for the no-new-standards case and for
standards cases. DOE generally analyzes
trends in market efficiency to project the
no-new standards case efficiency over
the NIA analysis period.
DOE seeks information on the
expected efficiency trends in the
consumer air cleaner market.
J. Manufacturer Impact Analysis
The purpose of the manufacturer
impact analysis (‘‘MIA’’) is to estimate
the financial impact of any new energy
conservation standards on
manufacturers of consumer air cleaners,
and to evaluate the potential impact of
such standards on direct employment
and manufacturing capacity. The MIA
includes both quantitative and
qualitative aspects. The quantitative
part of the MIA primarily relies on the
Government Regulatory Impact Model
(‘‘GRIM’’), an industry cash-flow model
adapted for each product in this
analysis, with the key output of industry
net present value (‘‘INPV’’). The
qualitative part of the MIA addresses the
potential impacts of energy conservation
standards on manufacturing capacity
and industry competition, as well as
factors such as product characteristics,
impacts on particular subgroups of
firms, and important market and
product trends.
As part of the MIA, DOE intends to
analyze impacts of energy conservation
standards on subgroups of
manufacturers of covered products,
including small business manufacturers.
DOE uses the Small Business
Administration’s (‘‘SBA’’) small
business size standards to determine
whether manufacturers qualify as small
businesses, which are listed by the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applicable North American Industry
Classification System (‘‘NAICS’’) code.21
Manufacturing of portable consumer air
cleaners is classified under NAICS
335210, ‘‘Small Electrical Appliance
Manufacturing, whereas manufacturing
of non-portable consumer air cleaners is
classified under NAICS 333413,
‘‘Industrial and Commercial Fan and
Blower and Air Purification Equipment
Manufacturing.’’ The SBA sets a
threshold of 1,500 employees or less
and 500 or less, respectively, for a
domestic entity to be considered as a
small business in these industry
categories. These employee thresholds
include all employees in a business’
parent company and any other
subsidiaries.
One aspect of assessing manufacturer
burden involves examining the
cumulative impact of multiple DOE
standards and the product-specific
regulatory actions of other federal
agencies that affect the manufacturers of
a covered product. While any one
regulation may not impose a significant
burden on manufacturers, the combined
effects of several existing or impending
regulations may have serious
consequences for some manufacturers,
groups of manufacturers, or an entire
industry. Assessing the impact of a
single regulation may overlook this
cumulative regulatory burden. In
addition to energy conservation
standards, other regulations can
significantly affect manufacturers’
financial operations. Multiple
regulations affecting the same
manufacturer can strain profits and lead
companies to abandon product lines or
markets with lower expected future
returns than competing products. For
these reasons, DOE conducts an analysis
of cumulative regulatory burden as part
of its rulemakings pertaining to
appliance efficiency.
To the extent feasible, DOE seeks the
names and contact information of any
domestic or foreign-based
manufacturers that distribute consumer
air cleaners in the United States.
In particular, DOE requests the names
and contact information of small
businesses, as defined by the SBA’s size
threshold, that manufacture consumer
air cleaners in the United States. In
addition, DOE requests comment on any
other manufacturer subgroups that
could be disproportionally impacted by
any new energy conservation standards.
DOE requests feedback on any potential
approaches that it could consider to
address impacts on manufacturers,
including small businesses.
21 Available online at www.sba.gov/document/
support--table-size-standards.
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
DOE requests information regarding
the cumulative regulatory burden
impacts on manufacturers of consumer
air cleaners associated with (1) other
DOE standards applying to different
products that these manufacturers may
also make and (2) product-specific
regulatory actions of other federal
agencies. DOE also requests comment
on its methodology for computing
cumulative regulatory burden and
whether there are any flexibilities it can
consider that would reduce this burden
while remaining consistent with the
requirements of EPCA.
IV. Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested parties to
submit in writing by the date specified
under the DATES heading, comments and
information on matters addressed in this
RFI and on other matters relevant to
DOE’s consideration of establishing test
procedure and energy conservation
standards for consumer air cleaners.
These comments and information will
aid in the development of a test
procedure NOPR and energy
conservation standard NOPR for
consumer air cleaners in which DOE
determines that establishing test
procedure and energy conservation
standards may be appropriate for these
products.
Submitting comments via
www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will
require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact
information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your
contact information will not be publicly
viewable except for your first and last
names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any).
If your comment is not processed
properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information
will be publicly viewable if you include
it in the comment or in any documents
attached to your comment. Any
information that you do not want to be
publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment.
Following this instruction, persons
viewing comments will see only first
and last names, organization names,
correspondence containing comments,
and any documents submitted with the
comments.
Do not submit information to
www.regulations.gov for which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 24, 2022
Jkt 256001
disclosure is restricted by statute, such
as trade secrets and commercial or
financial information (hereinafter
referred to as Confidential Business
Information (‘‘CBI’’)). Comments
submitted through www.regulations.gov
cannot be claimed as CBI. Anyone
submitting comments through the
website will waive any CBI claims for
the information submitted. For
information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be
posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of
comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not
be viewable for up to several weeks.
Please keep the comment tracking
number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully
uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email.
Comments and documents submitted
via email also will be posted to
www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be
publicly viewable, do not include it in
your comment or any accompanying
documents. Instead, provide your
contact information on a cover letter.
Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and
optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as
long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time
you submit comments, data, documents,
and other information to DOE. Faxes
will not be accepted.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide only documents that
are: Not secured, written in English and
free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special
characters or any form of encryption
and, if possible, they should carry the
electronic signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit
campaign form letters by the originating
organization in batches of between 50 to
500 form letters per PDF or as one form
letter with a list of supporters’ names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This
reduces comment processing and
posting time.
Confidential Business Information.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3715
should submit via email two wellmarked copies: One copy of the
document marked confidential
including all the information believed to
be confidential, and one copy of the
document marked ‘‘non-confidential’’
with the information believed to be
confidential deleted. DOE will make its
own determination about the
confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its
determination.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
DOE considers public participation to
be a very important part of the process
for developing test procedures and
energy conservation standards. DOE
actively encourages the participation
and interaction of the public during the
comment period in each stage of this
process. Interactions with and between
members of the public provide a
balanced discussion of the issues and
assist DOE in the process. Anyone who
wishes to be added to the DOE mailing
list to receive future notices and
information about this process should
contact Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287–
1445 or via email at
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on January 13, 2022,
by Kelly J. Speakes-Backman, Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 14,
2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022–01035 Filed 1–24–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3702-3715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01035]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE-2021-BT-STD-0035 and EERE-2021-TP-0036]
Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure and Energy
Conservation Standards for Consumer Products; Consumer Air Cleaners
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'') is initiating
rulemaking activities to consider potential test procedure and energy
conservation standards for consumer air cleaners. Through this request
for information (``RFI''), DOE seeks data and information regarding
development and evaluation of a new test procedure that would be
reasonably designed to produce test results which reflect energy use
during a representative average use cycle for the product without being
unduly burdensome to conduct. Additionally, this RFI solicits
information regarding the development and evaluation of potential new
energy conservation standards for consumer air cleaners, and whether
such standards would result in significant energy savings, be
technologically feasible and economically justified. DOE also welcomes
written comments from the public on any subject within the scope of
this document (including those topics not specifically raised), as well
as the submission of data and other relevant information.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested and will be
accepted on or before February 24, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively, interested persons
may submit comments, identified by docket number EERE-2021-BT-STD-0035
and EERE-2021-BT-TP-0036, by any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: to [email protected] or
[email protected]. Include docket number EERE-2021-BT-
STD-0035 and EERE-2021-BT-TP-0036 in the subject line of the message.
No telefacsimilies (``faxes'') will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this
process, see section IV of this document.
Although DOE has routinely accepted public comment submissions
through a variety of mechanisms, including postal mail and hand
delivery/courier, the Department has found it necessary to make
temporary modifications to the comment submission process in light of
the ongoing Coronavirus disease 2019 (``COVID-19'') pandemic. DOE is
currently suspending receipt of public comments via postal mail and
hand delivery/courier. If a commenter finds that this change poses an
undue hardship, please contact Appliance Standards Program staff at
(202) 586-1445 to discuss the need for alternative arrangements. Once
the COVID-19 pandemic health emergency is resolved, DOE anticipates
resuming all of its regular options for public comment submission,
including postal mail and hand delivery/courier.
Docket: The docket for this activity, which includes Federal
Register notices, comments, and other supporting documents/materials,
is available for review at www.regulations.gov. All documents in the
docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. However, some
documents listed in the index, such as those containing information
that is exempt from public disclosure, may not be publicly available.
[[Page 3703]]
The docket web pages can be found at: www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2021-BT-TP-0036 and www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2021-BT-STD-0035. The docket web page contains instructions on how to access all
documents, including public comments, in the docket. See section IV for
information on how to submit comments through www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Stephanie Johnson, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, EE-5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 287-1943. Email: [email protected].
Ms. Amelia Whiting, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-2588. Email:
[email protected].
For further information on how to submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket, contact the Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287-1445 or by email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Statutory Authority
B. Rulemaking History
C. Rulemaking Process for Test Procedure
D. Rulemaking Process for Energy Conservation Standards
E. Deviation From Appendix A
II. Request for Information and Comments Pertaining to Potential
Test Procedure
A. Scope and Definition
B. Test Procedure for Consumer Air Cleaners
1. Current Industry Test Procedure
2. Other Test Procedures
C. Metric for Consumer Air Cleaners
III. Request for Information and Comments Pertaining to Potential
Energy Conservation Standards
A. Market and Technology Assessment
1. Product Classes
2. Technology Assessment
B. Screening Analysis
C. Engineering Analysis
1. Efficiency Analysis
2. Cost Analysis
D. Distribution Channels and Markups Analysis
E. Energy Use Analysis
1. Consumer Samples and Market Breakdowns
2. Operating Hours
F. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analyses
G. Repair and Maintenance Costs
H. Shipments
I. National Impact Analysis
J. Manufacturer Impact Analysis
IV. Submission of Comments
I. Introduction
Consumer air cleaners are not currently subject to a DOE test
procedure or energy conservation standards. On September 16, 2021, DOE
published a notice of proposed determination (``NOPD'') in which DOE
tentatively determined that consumer air cleaners qualify as a
``covered product'' under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as
amended (``EPCA'') \1\ (``September 2021 NOPD''). 86 FR 51629. DOE
tentatively determined in the September 2021 NOPD that coverage of
consumer air cleaners is necessary or appropriate to carry out the
purposes of EPCA, and that the average U.S. household energy use for
consumer air cleaners is likely to exceed 100 kilowatt-hours (``kWh'')
per year. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Energy Act of 2020, Public Law 116-260 (Dec.
27, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following sections discuss DOE's authority to establish test
procedures and energy conservation standards for covered products,
relevant background information regarding DOE's consideration of
establishing federal regulations for consumer air cleaners, if DOE
determines such products are covered products, and a discussion of
DOE's rulemaking process for test procedures and energy conservation
standards.
A. Statutory Authority
EPCA authorizes DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of a number
of consumer products and certain industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291-
6317) Title III, Part B \2\ of EPCA established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles, which sets forth
a variety of provisions designed to improve energy efficiency for
certain products, referred to as ``covered products.'' \3\ In addition
to specifying a list of consumer products that are covered products,
EPCA contains provisions that enable the Secretary of Energy to
classify additional types of consumer products as covered products. To
classify a consumer product as a covered product, the Secretary must
determine that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated Part A.
\3\ The enumerated list of covered products is at 42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(1)-(19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Classifying the product as a covered product is necessary or
appropriate to carry out the purposes of EPCA; and
(2) The average annual per household \4\ energy use by products of
such type is likely to exceed 100 kWh (or British thermal unit
(``Btu'') equivalent) per year. (42 U.S.C. 6292(b)(1)) As stated, DOE
has preliminarily determined that consumer air cleaners are covered
products. 86 FR 51629.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ DOE has defined ``household'' to mean an entity consisting
of either an individual, a family, or a group of unrelated
individuals, who reside in a particular housing unit. For the
purpose of this definition:
(1) Group quarters means living quarters that are occupied by an
institutional group of 10 or more unrelated persons, such as a
nursing home, military barracks, halfway house, college dormitory,
fraternity or sorority house, convent, shelter, jail or correctional
institution.
(2) Housing unit means a house, an apartment, a group of rooms,
or a single room occupied as separate living quarters, but does not
include group quarters.
(3) Separate living quarters means living quarters:
(i) To which the occupants have access either:
(A) Directly from outside of the building, or
(B) Through a common hall that is accessible to other living
quarters and that does not go through someone else's living
quarters, and
(ii) Occupied by one or more persons who live and eat separately
from occupant(s) of other living quarters, if any, in the same
building. 10 CFR 430.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The energy conservation program under EPCA consists essentially of
four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. Relevant
provisions of EPCA include definitions (42 U.S.C. 6291), test
procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293), labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294),
energy conservation standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to
require information and reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296).
Federal energy efficiency requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing, labeling, and standards. (42
U.S.C. 6297) DOE may, however, grant waivers of Federal preemption for
particular State laws or regulations, in accordance with the procedures
and other provisions of EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d))
The Federal testing requirements consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must use as the basis for: (1)
Certifying to DOE that their products comply with the applicable energy
conservation standards adopted pursuant to EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6295(s)),
and (2) making other representations about the efficiency of that
product (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)). Similarly, DOE must use these test
procedures to determine whether the product complies with relevant
[[Page 3704]]
standards promulgated under EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
In 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth the criteria and procedures DOE
must follow when prescribing or amending test procedures for covered
products. Specifically, EPCA provides that DOE may, in accordance with
certain requirements, prescribe test procedures for any consumer
product classified as a covered product under section 6292(b). (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(B)) EPCA requires that any test procedures prescribed
or amended under this section must be reasonably designed to produce
test results which reflect energy efficiency, energy use or estimated
annual operating cost of a given type of covered product during a
representative average use cycle and must not be unduly burdensome to
conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
In addition, EPCA requires DOE to amend its test procedures for all
covered products to integrate measures of standby mode and off mode
energy consumption into the overall energy efficiency, energy
consumption, or other energy descriptor. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A))
When doing so, DOE must take into consideration the most current
versions of Standards 62301 and 62087 of the International
Electrotechnical Commission (``IEC''), unless the current test
procedure already incorporates the standby mode and off mode energy
consumption, or if such integration is technically infeasible. If an
integrated test procedure is technically infeasible, DOE must prescribe
separate standby mode and off mode energy use test procedures for the
covered product, if a separate test is technically feasible. (Id.)
If the Secretary determines, on her own behalf or in response to a
petition by any interested person, that a test procedure should be
prescribed, the Secretary shall promptly publish in the Federal
Register a proposed test procedure and afford interested persons an
opportunity to present oral and written data, views, and arguments with
respect to such a procedure. The comment period on a proposed rule to
amend a test procedure shall be at least 60 days and no more than 270
days. In prescribing or amending a test procedure, the Secretary shall
take into account such information as the Secretary determines relevant
to such procedure, including technological developments relating to
energy use or energy efficiency of the type (or class) of covered
products involved. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)) In prescribing a new or
amended test procedure, DOE must follow the statutory criteria of 42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)-(4), as discussed further in section I.C of this
document, and follow the rulemaking procedures set out in 42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(2). Before prescribing any final test procedure, the Secretary
must publish a proposed test procedure in the Federal Register, and
afford interested persons an opportunity (of not less than 60 days'
duration) to present oral and written data, views, and arguments on the
proposed test procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)).
Similarly, DOE must follow specific statutory criteria for
prescribing new or amended standards for covered products. Following a
coverage determination, DOE may prescribe an energy conservation
standard for any type (or class) of covered products of a type
specified in section 6292(a)(20) of EPCA, if the substantive and
procedural requirements of 42 U.S.C. 6295(o) and (p) are met and the
Secretary determines that: (1) The average per household energy use
within the United States by products of such type (or class) exceeded
150 kWh (or its Btu equivalent) for any 12-month period ending before
such determination; (2) the aggregate household energy use within the
United States by products of such type (or class) exceeded
4,200,000,000 kWh (or its Btu equivalent) for any such 12-month period;
(3) substantial improvement in the energy efficiency of products of
such type (or class) is technologically feasible; and (4) the
application of a labeling rule under section 6294 of this title to such
type (or class) is not likely to be sufficient to induce manufacturers
to produce, and consumers and other persons to purchase, covered
products of such type (or class) which achieve the maximum energy
efficiency which is technologically feasible and economically
justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(1)) Further, any new or amended standard
for covered products of a type specified in paragraph (20) of section
6292(a) of this title shall not apply to products manufactured within 5
years after the publication of a final rule establishing such standard.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(1)(2)
Further, EPCA requires that any new or amended energy conservation
standard prescribed by the Secretary be designed to achieve the maximum
improvement in energy or water efficiency that is technologically
feasible and economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) The
Secretary may not prescribe an amended or new standard that will not
result in significant conservation of energy, or is not technologically
feasible or economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)) DOE must
evaluate proposed new standards against the criteria of 42 U.S.C.
6295(o), as described further in section I.D of this document, and
follow the rulemaking procedures set out in 42 U.S.C. 6295(p). DOE is
publishing this RFI consistent with its authority and these
obligations.
B. Rulemaking History
DOE has not previously conducted a rulemaking for consumer air
cleaners. As stated, DOE tentatively determined in the September 2021
NOPD that: Coverage of consumer air cleaners is necessary or
appropriate to carry out the purposes of EPCA; the average U.S.
household energy use for consumer air cleaners is likely to exceed 100
kWh per year; and thus, consumer air cleaners qualify as a ``covered
product'' under EPCA. 86 FR 51629. In the September 2021 NOPD, DOE
sought comment on: (1) A proposed definition for consumer air cleaners;
(2) the energy use analysis conducted in support of the September 2021
NOPD; and (3) additional information and data to support DOE's
preliminary determination to classify consumer air cleaners as a
covered product under EPCA. 86 FR 51629, 51632-51633.
DOE is currently evaluating comments received from interested
parties in response to the September 2021 NOPD. DOE will address these
comments and publish a final decision on coverage as a separate notice.
C. Rulemaking Process for Test Procedure
As stated, EPCA requires that any test procedure prescribed or
amended must be reasonably designed to produce test results which
reflect energy efficiency, energy use or estimated annual operating
cost of a particular type of covered product during a representative
average use cycle and not be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3))
DOE will publish a notification in the Federal Register (e.g., an
RFI or notice of data availability (``NODA'')) whenever DOE is
considering initiation of a rulemaking to establish or amend a test
procedure. Section 8(a) of the Process Rule.
As part of such document(s), DOE will solicit submission of
comments, data, and information on whether DOE should proceed with the
rulemaking. Potential topics include whether a test procedure rule
would more accurately measure energy efficiency, energy use, or
estimated annual operating cost of a product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use without being unduly burdensome to
conduct; or reduce testing burden. Based on the information received in
response to
[[Page 3705]]
such request and its own analysis, DOE will determine whether to
proceed with a rulemaking for a new or amended test procedure. Section
8(a)(1) and (a)(2) of the Process Rule.
As detailed throughout this RFI, DOE is publishing this document
seeking input and data from interested parties to aid in DOE's
determination whether (and if so, how) to establish a test procedure
for consumer air cleaners.
D. Rulemaking Process for Energy Conservation Standards
As stated previously, following a coverage determination, DOE may
prescribe an energy conservation standard for any type (or class) of
covered products of a type specified in section 6292(a)(20) of EPCA, if
the substantive and procedural requirements in 42 U.S.C. 6295(o) and
(p) are met and the Secretary determines that: (1) The average per
household energy use within the United States by products of such type
(or class) exceeded 150 kWh (or its Btu equivalent) for any 12-month
period ending before such determination; (2) the aggregate household
energy use within the United States by products of such type (or class)
exceeded 4,200,000,000 kWhs (or its Btu equivalent) for any such 12-
month period; (3) substantial improvement in the energy efficiency of
products of such type (or class) is technologically feasible; and (4)
the application of a labeling rule under section 6294 of this title to
such type (or class) is not likely to be sufficient to induce
manufacturers to produce, and consumers and other persons to purchase,
covered products of such type (or class) which achieve the maximum
energy efficiency which is technologically feasible and economically
justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(1)) Further, any new or amended standard
for covered products of a type specified in paragraph (20) of section
6292(a) of this title shall not apply to products manufactured within 5
years after the publication of a final rule establishing such standard.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(1)(2)
DOE must follow specific statutory criteria for prescribing new or
amended standards for covered products. As stated, EPCA requires that
any new or amended energy conservation standard prescribed by the
Secretary be designed to achieve the maximum improvement in energy (or
water efficiency for certain products specified by EPCA) that is
technologically feasible and economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(A)) Furthermore, DOE may not adopt any standard that would
not result in the significant conservation of energy. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(3))
The significance of energy savings offered by a new or amended
energy conservation standard cannot be determined without knowledge of
the specific circumstances surrounding a given rulemaking.\5\ For
example, the United States rejoined the Paris Agreement on February 19,
2021. As part of that agreement, the United States has committed to
reducing greenhouse gas (``GHG'') emissions in order to limit the rise
in mean global temperature. As such, energy savings that reduce GHG
emission have taken on greater importance. Additionally, some covered
products and equipment have most of their energy consumption occur
during periods of peak energy demand. The impacts of these products on
the energy infrastructure can be more pronounced than products with
relatively constant demand. In evaluating the significance of energy
savings, DOE considers differences in primary energy and full-fuel-
cycle (``FFC'') effects for different covered products and equipment
when determining whether energy savings are significant. Primary energy
and FFC effects include the energy consumed in electricity production
(depending on load shape), in distribution and transmission, and in
extracting, processing, and transporting primary fuels (i.e., coal,
natural gas, petroleum fuels), and thus present a more complete picture
of the impacts of energy conservation standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 86 FR 70892, 70901 (Dec. 13, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, DOE evaluates the significance of energy savings on a
case-by-case basis.
To determine whether a standard is economically justified, EPCA
requires that DOE determine whether the benefits of the standard exceed
its burdens by considering, to the greatest extent practicable, the
following seven factors:
(1) The economic impact of the standard on the manufacturers and
consumers of the affected products;
(2) The savings in operating costs throughout the estimated
average life of the product compared to any increases in the initial
cost, or maintenance expenses;
(3) The total projected amount of energy and water (if
applicable) savings likely to result directly from the standard;
(4) Any lessening of the utility or the performance of the
products likely to result from the standard;
(5) The impact of any lessening of competition, as determined in
writing by the Attorney General, that is likely to result from the
standard;
(6) The need for national energy and water conservation; and
(7) Other factors the Secretary considers relevant.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(I)-(VII))
DOE fulfills these and other applicable requirements by conducting
a series of analyses throughout the rulemaking process. Table I.1 shows
the individual analyses that are performed to satisfy each of the
requirements within EPCA.
Table I.1--EPCA Requirements and Corresponding DOE Analysis
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPCA requirement Corresponding DOE analysis
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Significant Energy Savings............. Shipments Analysis.
National Impact
Analysis.
Energy and Water Use
Determination.
Technological Feasibility.............. Market and Technology
Assessment.
Screening Analysis.
Engineering Analysis.
Economic Justification:
1. Economic Impact on Manufacturers Manufacturer Impact
and Consumers. Analysis.
Life-Cycle Cost and
Payback Period Analysis.
Life-Cycle Cost
Subgroup Analysis.
Shipments Analysis.
2. Lifetime Operating Cost Savings Markups for Product
Compared to Increased Cost for the Price Determination.
Product. Energy and Water Use
Determination.
Life-Cycle Cost and
Payback Period Analysis.
[[Page 3706]]
3. Total Projected Energy Savings.. Shipments Analysis.
National Impact
Analysis.
4. Impact on Utility or Performance Screening Analysis.
Engineering Analysis.
5. Impact of Any Lessening of Manufacturer Impact
Competition. Analysis.
6. Need for National Energy and Shipments Analysis.
Water Conservation. National Impact
Analysis.
7. Other Factors the Secretary Employment Impact
Considers Relevant. Analysis.
Utility Impact
Analysis.
Emissions Analysis.
Monetization of
Emission Reductions Benefits.
Regulatory Impact
Analysis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining whether to consider establishing or amending any
energy conservation standard, DOE's general process is to publish one
or more preliminary (i.e., ``pre-NOPR'') documents in the Federal
Register intended to gather information on key issues. Section 6(a)(1)
of the Process Rule. Such document(s) could take several forms
depending upon the specific proceeding, including a framework document,
RFI, NODA, preliminary analysis, or advance notice of proposed
rulemaking. Section 6(a)(2) of the Process Rule. Such document(s) will
be published in the Federal Register, with any accompanying documents
referenced and posted in the appropriate docket. Section 6(a)(1) of the
Process Rule.
The pre-NOPR-stage document(s) will solicit submission of comments,
data, and information on whether DOE should proceed with the standards
rulemaking, including whether any new or amended rule would, as EPCA
requires, be economically justified, technologically feasible, and
result in a significant savings of energy. Section 6(a)(1) of the
Process Rule.
DOE will determine whether to proceed with a rulemaking for a new
or amended energy conservation standard based on the information
received in response to such request and its own analysis. Section
6(a)(3) of the Process Rule.
As detailed throughout this RFI, DOE is publishing this document
seeking input and data from interested parties to aid in the
development of the technical analyses on which DOE will ultimately rely
to determine whether (and if so, how) to establish energy conservation
standards for consumer air cleaners.
E. Deviation From Appendix A
In accordance with Section 3(a) of 10 CFR part 430, subpart C,
appendix A, DOE notes that it is deviating from that Appendix's
provision that DOE will publish its final coverage determination prior
to the initiation of any test procedure or energy conservation
standards rulemaking. 10 CFR part 430, subpart C, appendix A, section
5(c). DOE is opting to deviate from this step because DOE believes that
providing an opportunity for comment on potential test procedure and
energy conservation standards prior to a final coverage determination
for consumer air cleaners allows stakeholders an earlier opportunity to
provide comment, information, and data that may help inform DOE's
priority setting. DOE also notes that in the Energy Conservation
Program for Appliance Standards: Procedures, Interpretations, and
Policies for Consideration in New or Revised Energy Conservation
Standards and Test Procedures for Consumer Products and Commercial/
Industrial Equipment NOPR published on July 7, 2021, DOE proposed to
eliminate the requirement that coverage determination rulemakings must
be finalized prior to initiation of a test procedure or energy
conservation standard rulemaking. 86 FR 35668, 35672. DOE explained
that the coverage determination, test procedure, and energy
conservation standard rulemakings are interdependent and a coverage
determination defines the product/equipment scope for which DOE can
establish test procedure and energy conservation standards. It also
signals that inclusion of the consumer product is necessary to carry
out the purpose of EPCA, i.e., to conserve energy and/or water. In
order to make this determination, DOE needs to consider whether a test
procedure and energy conservation standards can be established for the
consumer product. If DOE cannot develop a test procedure that measures
energy use during a representative average use cycle and is not unduly
burdensome to conduct (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) or prescribe energy
conservation standards that result in significant energy savings (42
U.S.C. 6295(o), then making a coverage determination is not necessary
as it will not result in the conservation of energy. Thus, it is
important that DOE be able to gather information and provide
stakeholders an opportunity to comment and provide information and data
pertinent to test procedure and energy conservation standard
rulemakings, while DOE conducts a coverage determination rulemaking.
Id.
In accordance with Section 3(a) of 10 CFR part 430, subpart C,
appendix A, DOE notes that it is deviating from that Appendix's
provision requiring a 75-day comment period for pre-NOPR rulemaking
documents for standards. 10 CFR part 430, subpart C, appendix A,
section 6(d)(2). DOE is opting to deviate from this step because the
30-day comment period will allow DOE to review comments received in
response to this document before finalizing its coverage determination.
It would also help inform the Department in prioritizing any potential
rulemakings for air cleaners in light of its other on-going rulemakings
and statutory requirements. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(``EPA's'') ENERGY STAR[supreg] Program (``ENERGY STAR Program'')
includes consumer air cleaners. In light of this, DOE expects that
stakeholders have established a strong understanding of the key
information and issues that would be of interest to DOE as it considers
developing test procedure and energy conservation standards for
consumer air cleaners. DOE also expects that test data are likely
readily available from the ENERGY STAR Program as well as the
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers' (``AHAM's'') Directory of
Certified Portable Electric Room Air Cleaners.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See: www.ahamdir.com/room-air-cleaners/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 3707]]
II. Request for Information and Comments Pertaining to Potential Test
Procedure
In the following sections, DOE has identified a variety of issues
on which it seeks input to assist in its evaluation of a potential test
procedure for consumer air cleaners, to ensure that any such test
procedure would, as EPCA requires, be reasonably designed to produce
test results which reflect energy use during a representative average
use cycle without being unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3))
A. Scope and Definition
Consumer air cleaners are products designed to remove particulate
matter and other contaminants from the air to improve indoor air
quality. A wide range of consumer air cleaners are available on the
market, including tabletop units, units designed for single rooms or
multiple rooms, and whole-home units integrated into a central heating
and/or cooling system. Consumer air cleaners employ a wide variety of
technologies to remove particular matter and other contaminants from
the air. They may include secondary functions, typically indoor air
quality improvement, that supplement or enhance that primary function,
such as providing air circulation, humidification, or dehumidification.
In the September 2021 NOPD, DOE proposed a definition for ``air
cleaner'' to help inform its proposed scope of coverage and regulatory
definition. 86 FR 51629, 51632. DOE consulted existing definitions and
classifications of consumer air cleaners developed by AHAM--the
industry trade group for consumer air cleaners--and the ENERGY STAR
Program, and additional market research conducted by DOE. Id. at 86 FR
51631.
AHAM defined ``air cleaner'' in an industry standard, it published
and which is certified by American National Standards Institute
(``ANSI''), to measure the performance of portable household electric
room air cleaners, titled ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 Portable Household
Electric Room Air Cleaners (``ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020'').\7\ Section 3.1 of
ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 defines ``Portable Household Electric Room Air
Cleaner'' as ``[a]n electric appliance with the function of removing
particulate matter from the air and which can be moved from room to
room.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 available at AHAM website at
www.aham.org/itemdetail?iproductcode=30002&category=padstd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ENERGY STAR Program also establishes a definition for room air
cleaners (also referred to as air purifiers), in addition to
qualification criteria for an air cleaner to earn the ENERGY STAR
label.\8\ The current ENERGY STAR V2.0 Product Specification \9\
defines ``room air cleaner'' as ``an electric appliance with the
function of removing particulate matter from the air and which can be
moved from room to room,'' consistent with ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See ENERGY STAR website for air purifiers (cleaners) at
www.energystar.gov/products/air_purifiers_cleaners.
\9\ See Eligibility Criteria Version 2.0, Rev. April 2021,
available at www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/ENERGY%20STAR%20Version%202.0%20Room%20Air%20Cleaners%20Specification_Rev%20April%202021_with%20Partner%20Commitments.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the September 2021 NOPD, the definitions in ANSI/
AHAM AC-1-2020 and the ENERGY STAR V2.0 Product Specification include
specific air cleaning and air purifying designs and technologies, but
are limited to ``portable'' air cleaners that ``can be moved from room
to room.'' DOE noted in the September 2021 NOPD that while ANSI/AHAM
AC-1-2020 specifies that the standard is applicable only to portable
air cleaners, it includes definitions and setup instructions for air
cleaners that include wall mounting brackets or instructions to mount
the air cleaner integrally to the wall. 86 FR 51629, 51632. To cover a
more comprehensive range of the consumer market for air cleaning and
purification, an expanded definition of a consumer air cleaner may be
appropriate. DOE therefore considered a modified definition that would
include other consumer air cleaners, such as those that are mounted on
walls and ceilings, or that are designed for whole-home air cleaning in
conjunction with central heating or air conditioning systems. 86 FR
51629, 51632. The proposed definition expands the range of products to
include those that use technologies that clean the air by destroying or
deactivating contaminants, including microbes as well as particulates,
from the air (instead of only removing them). Id. at 86 FR 51632.
DOE proposed in the September 2021 NOPD to define a consumer air
cleaner as a consumer product that:
(1) Is a self-contained, mechanically encased assembly;
(2) Is powered by single-phase electric current;
(3) Removes, destroys, or deactivates particulates and
microorganisms from the air; and
(4) Excludes products that destroy or deactivate particulates and
microorganisms solely by means of ultraviolet (``UV'') light without a
fan for air circulation; and
(5) Excludes central air conditioners, room air conditioners,
portable air conditioners, dehumidifiers, and furnaces as defined in 10
CFR 430.2. . 86 FR 51629, 51632.
As discussed in the September 2021 NOPD, DOE proposed to exclude
from coverage those consumer products that purify air solely by means
of UV light without circulating air through the product using a fan
because the energy-consuming component of such products would be a
fluorescent lamp or light-emitting diode designed to emit light in the
UV portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. 86 FR 51629, 51632.
Accordingly, DOE would classify these products under EPCA as a type of
lamp (see the definition of ``lamps primarily designed to produce
radiation in the ultraviolet region of the spectrum'' and ``light-
emitting diode or LED'' in 10 CFR 430.2), and therefore, did not
consider applying any future consumer air cleaner requirements to these
products. Id.
DOE continues to evaluate comments received from interested parties
in response to the proposed definition for consumer air cleaners in the
September 2021 NOPD.
B. Test Procedure for Consumer Air Cleaners
DOE has examined existing test methods to measure key performance
characteristics for determining the energy efficiency of consumer air
cleaners. These performance characteristics include clean air delivery
rate (``CADR''), operating (i.e., active) mode power consumption, and
standby mode power consumption. DOE is seeking comment on whether the
test methods identified below, could be used as the basis for a DOE
test procedure for consumer air cleaners. In particular, DOE is seeking
comment on any modifications to these test methods that would be needed
to test the full range of products under DOE's proposed definition of
consumer air cleaner.
1. Current Industry Test Procedure
As discussed, AHAM published ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 for measuring the
performance of portable household electric room air cleaners.
Section 3.14 of ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 defines CADR as the metric to
measure an air cleaner's efficacy in removing particulate matter from
the air. CADR represents the rate of particulate reduction in the test
[[Page 3708]]
chamber when the air cleaner is turned on, minus the rate of ``natural
decay'' \10\ when the air cleaner is not running, multiplied by the
volume of the test chamber (specified as 1,008 cubic feet). As such,
testing an air cleaner requires conducting two separate tests: A first
test with the air cleaner turned off, and a second test with the air
cleaner turned on. The CADR value is expressed in units of cubic feet
per minute (``cfm'').\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ AHAM defines ``natural decay'' as the reduction of
particulate matter due to natural phenomena in the test chamber:
Principally agglomeration [a process in which fine particles
``clump'' together], surface deposition [a process in which
particles attach to a surface] (including sedimentation [a process
in which particles settle out of suspension in the air onto a
surface due to gravity]), and air exchange.
\11\ Although the unit of measurement for CADR is cfm, ANSI/AHAM
AC-1-2020 explains that CADR values indicate the performance of an
air cleaner as a complete system and that the metric has no linear
relationship to air movement or to the characteristics of any
particular particle removal methodology per se.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections 5, 6, and 7 of ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 specify procedures for
measuring air cleaner efficacy using three different types of
particulates representing three ranges of particulate matter size:
Pollen (5 micrometer (``[mu]m'') to 11 [mu]m diameter), dust (0.5 [mu]m
to 3.0 [mu]m diameter), and cigarette smoke (0.10 [mu]m to 1.0 [mu]m
diameter), respectively.
Section 2 of ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 indicates that the precision of
the test method is as follows: 25 cfm for pollen CADR;
10 cfm for dust CADR; and 10 cfm for
cigarette smoke CADR. Given these levels of precision, ANSI/AHAM AC-1-
2020 is limited to measuring air cleaners within rated CADR ranges of
10 to 600 cfm for dust and cigarette smoke and 25 to 450 cfm for
pollen.
Section 9 of ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 also includes methods to measure
the air cleaner's operating power and standby power usage in Watts
(``W''), as discussed further in sections II.B.1.a and II.B.1.b of this
document.
All CADR and power testing are performed in a test chamber with a
controlled environment. Section 4 of ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 specifies
requirements for electrical power supply, test chamber ambient
temperature, test chamber air exchange rate, test chamber particulate
concentrations, and use of a recirculation fan in the test chamber.
a. Operating (Active) Mode Testing
ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 specifies methodologies to obtain consistent
levels of particulate concentration in the test chamber for each of the
three particulate types. An aerosol generator disseminates the
appropriate particulate for each test. The method also discusses using
other devices, such as a cigarette smoke diluter and aerosol
spectrometer to maintain consistent test particulate levels during the
test and to measure the particle size distribution within the room air,
respectively. For each particulate, two tests are performed, one with
the air cleaner not operating and one with it operating. First, to
measure the natural decay of the particulate under evaluation, the air
cleaner is not operated and the particulates are distributed within the
room at a specified concentration. Particulate concentration is
measured and averaged over a period of time prescribed for each
particulate type. In the second test, the air cleaner is operated at
the setting that results in the maximum particulate removal rate and
the particulate matter removal is measured using the same process as in
the first test. Particulate concentration is again measured over a
prescribed period of time, and the rate of particulate reduction is
calculated. The difference of the rate of particulate reduction with
the air cleaner operating minus the rate of natural decay with the air
cleaner not operating, multiplied by the volume of the test chamber,
provides the CADR value for that particulate type.
Section 9 of ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 specifies methods for measuring
operating power. The section allows measuring operating power during
the CADR test for either cigarette smoke or dust, the duration of each
being greater than 15 minutes, which is enough time to measure
operating power. After the air cleaner motor has been conditioned as
specified in Section 9.2 of ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020, the power measuring
instrument is connected between the power supply and air cleaner, and
all settings/options are set at the maximum level. The air cleaner is
operated for 2 minutes without any power measurements, and then power
consumption is recorded at 1-minute intervals for 13 minutes (for a
total test time of 15 minutes). Up to three of the 13 data points may
be discarded as anomalous to account for line surges and other
variables. The remaining power measurements are averaged to obtain the
operating power, in W, of the air cleaner.
DOE requests comments on whether ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 provides an
appropriate method to use as the basis for a Federal test method and
for defining energy conservation standard levels for consumer air
cleaners.
DOE requests comment on the use of the CADR, as opposed to another
metric such as rate of decay, to characterize consumer air cleaner
performance. In particular, DOE requests comment on whether consumers
could find the unit of measurement of cfm for CADR confusing and
misunderstand it as referring to the rate of air movement through the
device.
DOE requests comment on whether the power measurement could vary
based on the particulate test that is used to measure operating power.
If power measurement varies based on the particulate test, DOE requests
comment on which particulate test (pollen, dust, or cigarette smoke)
should be used as the basis for the power measurement in any Federal
test procedure that DOE may develop. Alternately, DOE requests comment
on whether it should consider requiring power measurements for each
particulate test and use a simple or weighted average to determine
operating power.
DOE requests comment on whether it should consider testing consumer
air cleaners at any other power level in addition to the maximum power
level required by ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020.
DOE requests comment on whether ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 could also be
used to test other types of consumer air cleaners, such as ceiling-
mounted products.
b. Standby Mode Testing
Section 10 of ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 specifies a measurement procedure
for standby mode that is performed as a separate test from the CADR and
operating power tests. The standby power test specifies allowable
ranges for three environmental conditions: Air speed in the room,
ambient air temperature, and voltage supply. As specified, the standby
power test method may only be used when the selected mode and measured
power consumption are stable (defined as a variation of less than 5
percent in measured power consumption over 5 minutes). When stability
is not achieved, power consumption can be determined by alternative
methods: By averaging the power readings over a specified period of
time or by recording the energy consumption over a specified period and
dividing by the total time period.
To perform the standby mode test, the air cleaner is connected to
the metering equipment. After the air cleaner has been allowed to
stabilize for at least 5 minutes, the power consumption is monitored
for not less than an additional 5 minutes. If the power consumption
does not drift by more than 5 percent (from the maximum value observed)
during the latter 5 minutes, the load is considered stable
[[Page 3709]]
and the power consumption can be recorded directly from the instrument
at the end of the latter 5 minute period. The resulting standby power
is reported in W, rounded to the nearest hundredths.
The standby mode test method specified in ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 is
different from that specified in the most current version of IEC
Standard 62301, Edition 2.0, ``Household electrical appliances--
Measurement of standby power'' (``IEC 62301 Ed. 2.0''), which is the
standard that EPCA directs DOE to consider when including measurements
of standby mode and off mode energy use in its test procedures for
covered products, if technically feasible. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A))
IEC 62301 Ed. 2.0 provides three methods to measure standby power,
depending on the characteristics of the power consumption in standby
mode (e.g., stable, unstable, cyclic, of a limited duration, etc.) The
three methods are: the sampling method, the average reading method, and
the direct meter reading method. The sampling method, which is the
method incorporated by reference most frequently in DOE test procedures
for other covered products, specifies that the unit under test must be
operated in standby mode for at least 15 minutes and standby power is
recorded at least once every second. To determine standby power, the
data from the second two-thirds of the total test duration is used to
determine stability. If the measured power is less than or equal to 1
W, stability is established when a linear regression through all power
readings for the second two-thirds of the total period has a slope of
less than 10 milliwatts per hour (``mW/h''). If the measured power is
greater than 1 W, stability is established when a linear regression
through all power readings for the second two-thirds of the total
period has a slope that is less than 1 percent of the measured input
power per hour.
DOE requests comment on the suitability of the standby power
measurement procedure specified in ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020, IEC 62301 Ed.
2.0, or any other test method for measuring standby mode and off mode
energy use of consumer air cleaners, in light of EPCA's requirement in
42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) for DOE to consider the most current version
of IEC Standard 62301.
2. Other Test Procedures
In addition to ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020, DOE is aware of a few other
test methods for air cleaners. DOE has identified two test methods to
measure how effectively a unit removes microorganisms from the air (as
opposed to particles such as smoke, pollen, and dust). DOE has
additionally identified two other test methods that measure the
effectiveness of removing particulates from the air, similar to the
ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 testing standard.
The first of these test methods was developed by the Center for
Engineering and Environmental Technology at Research Triangle Institute
(``RTI''), titled ``Methodology to Perform Clean Air Delivery Rate Type
Determinations with Microbiological Aerosols'' \12\ (``RTI Test
Method''). The stated objective of the RTI Test Method is to determine
a CADR-type measurement for an air cleaner using microbiological
aerosols. The method is described as a modification of the ANSI/AHAM
AC-1 test method that can be used for evaluating a wide range of air
cleaning devices. Similar to the ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 test method, the
RTI Test Method requires measuring the natural decay rate without the
air cleaner operating and the particulate removal rate while the air
cleaner is operating in a test chamber. The RTI Test Method has been
conducted using mold, bacteria, and viruses, representing the primary
groups of microorganisms that a household air cleaner would be expected
to remove in a home.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ RTI Test Method available at: doi.org/10.1080/713834074.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The second of these test methods was developed by researchers at
Korea Testing Laboratory (``KTL''), Dongguk University, and Biot Korea
Inc., titled ``Assessment of air purifier on efficient removal of
airborne bacteria, Staphylococcus epidermidis, using single-chamber
method'' \13\ (``KTL Test Method''). The objective of the KTL Test
Method is to measure an air cleaner's efficacy of removing airborne
bacteria from indoor air. Similar to ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 and the RTI
Test Method, the KTL Test Method involves measuring both a natural
decay rate (i.e., without the air cleaner operating) and a particulate
decay rate while the air cleaner is operating in a test chamber. The
output of the KTL Test Method, unlike ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 and the RTI
Test Method, which output a CADR value (with units of cfm), is a
unitless value representing the ratio of the natural decay rate to the
particulate decay rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ KTL Test Method available at: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-019-7876-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The third of these test methods is the ANSI/American Society of
Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (``ASHRAE'')
standard 52.2-2017, titled ``Method of Testing General Ventilation Air-
Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size'' \14\
(``ASHRAE 52.2-2017''). ASHRAE 52.2-2017 specifies a test method to
evaluate air cleaner performance as a function of particle size using
an aerosol generator to introduce standardized amounts of dust at
periodic intervals to simulate accumulation of particles over the
lifetime of the air cleaner. The standard measures air cleaner
performance based on the removal efficiency of particles with 12
defined particle size ranges between 0.3 and 10 [mu]m in diameter.
Efficiency measurements for each of the 12 particle size ranges are
taken at various dust loads by challenging the filter with potassium
chloride particles. This test aerosol provides particles over the
entire range of 0.3 to 10 [mu]m required by the test procedure. The
output metric is the minimum efficiency reporting value (``MERV''),
that quantifies the effectiveness of the air cleaner's filtration on a
16-point scale.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ ASHRAE 52.2-2017 available at: ashrae.org/File%20Library/Technical%20Resources/COVID-19/52_2_2017_COVID-19_20200401.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fourth testing method is from the National Research Council
Canada (``NRCC''). The NRCC's publication is titled, ``Method for
Testing Portable Air Cleaner's'' \15\ (``NRCC Test Method''). The NRCC
Test Method determines the air cleaner's performance by measuring
particle, volatile organic compounds (``VOCs'') (including
formaldehyde, toluene, and d-limonene), and ozone removal. Known
quantities of particles of different sizes, ozone, and the selected
VOCs are introduced in different tests until a certain established
target concentration is achieved. The NRCC Test Method provides
multiple suggested procedures for injecting particles and VOCs into the
test chamber. Once target contaminant levels in the test chamber have
been achieved, the injection of particles or VOCs is stopped, and the
concentration decay rate is measured while the air cleaner is
operating. Particle concentration is recommended to be measured using
either a condensation particle counter, optical particle counter, or an
aerodynamic particle sizer. Formaldehyde concentration is determined
using a high-performance liquid chromatograph technique and toluene and
d-limonene concentrations are measured using a gas chromatograph--mass
spectrometer technique. Ozone levels in the chamber air are determined
using an analyzer
[[Page 3710]]
based on either chemiluminescence or UV absorption. These results are
then compared to test results without the air cleaner operating to
assess the removal effectiveness of the unit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ NRCC Test Method available at: nrc-publications.canada.ca/
eng/view/ft/?id=cc1570e0-53cc-476d-b2ee-3e252d8bd739.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, in response to the September 2021 NOPD, AHAM
commented that it was working on an updated standard to measure the
energy efficiency for room air cleaners, AHAM AC-7-2021, ``Energy Test
Method for Portable Air Cleaners''. (Docket No. EERE-2021-BT-DET-0022,
AHAM, No. 13 at p. 1) AHAM has not yet issued this test method.
DOE requests comment on whether it should consider any methodology
for measuring the removal efficacy of microorganisms (i.e., viruses,
bacteria, mold, etc.) from indoor air as part of a Federal test
procedure for consumer air cleaners.
DOE requests comment on the suitability of each of the RTI Test
Method and the KTL Test Method for measuring a consumer air cleaner's
removal efficacy of microorganisms from indoor air.
DOE requests comment on the additional test methods identified in
this section that measure the performance of consumer air cleaners
using various particulates. In particular, DOE requests comment on the
scope, methodology, and types of particulates, pollutants, and/or
microorganisms that are included in each test method.
DOE requests comments on whether any other test methods have been
developed for consumer air cleaners that would be relevant to DOE's
consideration of a Federal test procedure to measure the energy
efficiency of consumer air cleaners. In particular, DOE seeks comment
on test methods that could be used to test ``non-portable'' consumer
air cleaners, such as those that are permanently mounted (e.g.,
ceiling-mounted air cleaners) or that provide whole-home air cleaning
in conjunction with central heating or air conditioning systems; and
test methods that could be used to measure the performance of consumer
air cleaners that destroy or deactivate contaminants from the air
instead of removing them.
C. Metric for Consumer Air Cleaners
As discussed, EPCA requires that any test procedure prescribed or
amended must be reasonably designed to produce test results which
reflect energy efficiency, energy use or estimated annual operating
cost of a given type of covered product during a representative average
use cycle and not be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3))
In addition, EPCA requires DOE to amend its test procedure for all
covered products to integrate measures of standby mode and off mode
energy consumption into the overall energy efficiency, energy
consumption, or other energy descriptor, taking into consideration the
most current versions of IEC Standards 62301 and 62087. There are only
two exceptions: If the current test procedure already incorporates the
standby mode and off mode energy consumption, or if such integration is
technically infeasible. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) If an integrated
test procedure is technically infeasible, DOE must prescribe separate
standby mode and off mode energy use test procedures for the covered
product, if a separate test is technically feasible. (Id.)
The ENERGY STAR V2.0 Product Specification \16\ for Room Air
Cleaners defines separate ``on mode'' (i.e., active mode) and ``partial
on mode'' (i.e., standby/off mode) metrics to certify air cleaners
under the ENERGY STAR label. The on mode criterion is defined in terms
of a minimum ``CADR/W'' metric. That metric, in turn, is defined as the
rated smoke CADR measurement divided by the operating power consumption
measured during the smoke particle removal test, each of which is
determined in accordance with ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020. The partial on mode
criterion is defined in terms of a maximum wattage level, as determined
in accordance with IEC Standard 62301.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Eligibility Criteria Version 2.0, Rev. April 2021,
available at www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/ENERGY%20STAR%20Version%202.0%20Room%20Air%20Cleaners%20Specification_Rev%20April%202021_with%20Partner%20Commitments.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with the requirements of EPCA, DOE would evaluate
whether an integrated test procedure (i.e., a test procedure that
integrates measures of standby mode and off mode energy consumption
into the overall energy efficiency descriptor) is technically feasible.
For example, DOE could define an integrated CADR/W metric in which the
denominator represents a weighted average of the power consumption
associated with active mode, standby mode, and off mode, weighted by
the amount of time spent in each mode. DOE notes that the ENERGY STAR
program assumes 16 active mode hours per day and 8 inactive mode (i.e.,
standby or off mode) hours per day to calculate annual energy
consumption of qualifying consumer air cleaners.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The ENERGY STAR online product database provides a
description of the Annual Energy Use calculation at
data.energystar.gov/dataset/ENERGY-STAR-Certified-Room-Air-Cleaners/jmck-i55n/data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE requests comment on the technical feasibility of integrating
measures of standby mode and off mode energy consumption into the
overall energy efficiency descriptor (i.e., creating an integrated
metric) for consumer air cleaners. In particular, DOE requests comment
on its example approach of defining an integrated CADR/W metric, in
which the denominator would represent a weighted average of the power
consumption associated with active mode, standby mode, and off mode,
weighted by the amount of time spent in each mode.
DOE requests comment on consumer usage of consumer air cleaners, in
particular, the amount of time spent in active mode, standby mode, and
off mode.
As discussed previously, ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 specifies procedures
for measuring CADR ratings for three types of particulate matter:
Pollen, dust, and cigarette smoke. Prior to Version 2.0 of the Product
Specification for Room Air Cleaners, the ENERGY STAR eligibility
criteria were based on the CADR/W metric using the dust particle
removal test. That changed in a draft version of the V2.0 Product
Specification,\18\ where EPA described its understanding that smoke
pollutants can have the greatest health risk for the general population
and that the AHAM Verification Program for room air cleaners calculates
the appropriate room size for a given room air cleaner based on the
cigarette smoke CADR measurement. (See Note box in Section 3.3.1 of the
draft.) EPA also stated that retailers appear to use this calculation
to direct consumers to a specific room air cleaner. Id. EPA noted that
cigarette smoke has the smallest particle size of the three pollutants
tested to the ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2015 standard and is typically the most
energy intensive to remove. Id. For these reasons, and in consideration
of stakeholder feedback, EPA asserted that cigarette smoke is the
appropriate pollutant to use as the basis for evaluating the energy
efficiency of room air cleaners. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Draft 1 Version 2.0 specification at
www.energystar.gov/products/spec/room_air_cleaners_version_2_0_pd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE requests comment on whether cigarette smoke would be the
appropriate particulate for determining a CADR rating of air cleaners
under a DOE test procedure, should DOE adopt a measurement of CADR in a
test procedure for consumer air cleaners. If cigarette smoke is not the
most appropriate particulate, DOE requests comment on other
particulate(s) that
[[Page 3711]]
would be more appropriate as the basis for measurement, including data
and information to support such a recommendation.
As discussed previously, ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 specifies that it can
be used to test ``portable'' air cleaners that ``can be moved from room
to room.'' \19\ These include floor type, table type, and wall type
units. Ceiling type units are explicitly outside the scope of that test
method. ANSI/AHAM AC-1-2020 also does not apply to ``non-portable''
consumer air cleaners, such as those that are designed for whole-home
air cleaning in conjunction with central heating or air conditioning
systems. DOE is not aware of test procedures for these types of units
and seeks guidance on whether the CADR/W efficiency metric would be
appropriate for characterizing the energy efficiency of these types of
units. DOE also seeks guidance about consumer air cleaners that clean
the air by destroying or deactivating particulates and microorganisms
from the air instead of removing them (for example, a consumer air
cleaner designed to purify air using UV light or other heat in
combination with a fan to circulate air through the product). In
particular, DOE seeks input on whether the CADR/W metric would be
appropriate for such products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ DOE notes the vague nature of ``can be,'' which depends
greatly on the abilities of the person or people involved in
attempting to move the item.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE requests comment on whether the CADR/W efficiency metric would
be appropriate for characterizing the energy efficiency of consumer air
cleaner units permanently mounted to a structure.
DOE requests comment on whether the CADR/W metric would be
appropriate for consumer air cleaners that clean the air by destroying
or deactivating particulates and microorganisms from the air instead of
removing them.
DOE requests comment on whether any other metrics not already
discussed in this RFI would provide a better measure of energy
efficiency or energy use of consumer air cleaners during a
representative average use cycle or period of use.
III. Request for Information and Comments Pertaining to Potential
Energy Conservation Standards
DOE is also publishing this RFI to collect data and information to
inform its decision, consistent with its obligations under EPCA, as to
whether the Department should proceed with an energy conservation
standards rulemaking. In the following sections, DOE has identified a
variety of issues on which it seeks input to aid in the development of
the technical and economic analyses regarding whether standards for
consumer air cleaners may be warranted.
As stated previously, following a coverage determination, EPCA
outlines four criteria for prescribing an energy conservation standard
for a newly covered product. The four criteria are that: (1) The
average per household domestic energy use by such products exceeded 150
kWh (or its Btu equivalent) for any 12-month period ending before such
determination; (2) the aggregate domestic household energy use by such
product exceeded 4.2 million kWh (or its Btu equivalent) for any such
12-month period; (3) substantial improvement in the energy efficiency
of the products is technologically feasible; and (4) applying a
labeling rule is not likely to be sufficient to induce manufacturers to
produce, and consumers and other persons to purchase, products of such
type which achieve the maximum energy efficiency which is
technologically feasible and economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(l)(1))
DOE seeks data and information on whether the four criteria for
prescribing an energy conservation standard for air cleaners are met.
DOE seeks comment on whether energy conservation standards for
consumer air cleaners would be economically justified, technologically
feasible, and would result in a significant savings of energy.
A. Market and Technology Assessment
The market and technology assessment that DOE routinely conducts
when analyzing the impacts of a potential new or amended energy
conservation standard provides information about the consumer air
cleaner industry that will be used in DOE's analysis throughout the
rulemaking process. DOE uses qualitative and quantitative information
to characterize the structure of the industry and market. DOE
identifies manufacturers, estimates market shares and trends, addresses
regulatory and non-regulatory initiatives intended to improve energy
efficiency or reduce energy consumption, and explores the potential for
efficiency improvements in the design and manufacturing of consumer air
cleaners. DOE also reviews product literature, industry publications,
and company websites. Additionally, DOE considers conducting interviews
with manufacturers to improve its assessment of the market and
available technologies.
For consumer air cleaners, DOE is interested in understanding the
consumer air cleaner market, the impact of the current COVID-19
pandemic on this market, and whether the current industry trends are a
result of the pandemic or expected to stay long-term.
DOE seeks feedback on how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the
consumer air cleaner market. DOE requests any available market data or
information on recent consumer behavior trends for consumer air
cleaners in response to the pandemic.
1. Product Classes
When evaluating and establishing energy conservation standards, DOE
may divide covered products into product classes by the type of energy
used, or by capacity or other performance-related features that justify
a different standard. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q)) In making a determination
whether capacity or another performance-related feature justifies a
different standard, DOE must consider such factors as the utility of
the feature to the consumer and other factors DOE deems appropriate.
(Id.) For consumer air cleaners, DOE may use CADR as a measurement of
capacity.
DOE requests comment on whether capacity or any other performance-
related features, such as air cleaning technology (i.e., whether the
product destroys or deactivates contaminants from the air or removes
them), of consumer air cleaners would justify the establishment of
different product classes (i.e., would justify different standards for
such classes).
2. Technology Assessment
In analyzing the feasibility of potential new energy conservation
standards, DOE uses information about technology options and prototype
designs to help identify technologies that manufacturers could use to
meet and/or exceed a given energy conservation standard level under
consideration. In consultation with interested parties, DOE intends to
develop a list of technologies to consider in its analysis.
DOE seeks information on technologies that are used to improve the
energy efficiency of consumer air cleaners. Specifically, DOE seeks
information on the range of efficiencies or performance characteristics
that are currently available for each technology option.
For each technology option suggested by stakeholders, DOE seeks
information regarding its market adoption, costs, and
[[Page 3712]]
any concerns with incorporating the technology into products (e.g.,
impacts on consumer utility, potential safety concerns, manufacturing
or production challenges, etc.).
B. Screening Analysis
The purpose of the screening analysis is to evaluate the
technologies that improve energy efficiency to determine which
technologies will be eliminated from further consideration and which
will be passed to the engineering analysis for further consideration.
DOE determines whether to eliminate certain technology options from
further consideration based on the following criteria:
(1) Technological feasibility. Technologies that are not
incorporated in commercial products or in working prototypes will
not be considered further.
(2) Practicability to manufacture, install, and service. If it
is determined that mass production of a technology in commercial
products and reliable installation and servicing of the technology
could not be achieved on the scale necessary to serve the relevant
market at the time of the compliance date of the standard, then that
technology will not be considered further.
(3) Impacts on product utility or product availability. If a
technology is determined to have significant adverse impact on the
utility of the product to significant subgroups of consumers, or
result in the unavailability of any covered product type with
performance characteristics (including reliability), features,
sizes, capacities, and volumes that are substantially the same as
products generally available in the United States at the time, it
will not be considered further.
(4) Adverse impacts on health or safety. If it is determined
that a technology will have significant adverse impacts on health or
safety, it will not be considered further.
(5) Unique-Pathway Proprietary Technologies. If a design option
utilizes proprietary technology that represents a unique pathway to
achieving a given efficiency level, that technology will not be
considered further due to the potential for monopolistic concerns.
Sections 6(b)(3) and 7(b) of the Process Rule.
Technology options identified in the technology assessment are
evaluated against these criteria using DOE analyses and inputs from
interested parties (e.g., manufacturers, trade organizations, and
energy efficiency advocates). Technologies that pass through the
screening analysis are referred to as ``design options'' in the
engineering analysis. Technology options that fail to meet one or more
of the five criteria are eliminated from consideration.
DOE requests feedback on whether any air cleaner technology options
would be screened out based on the five screening criteria described in
this section. DOE also requests information on the technologies that
would be screened out and the screening criteria that would be
applicable to each screened out technology option.
C. Engineering Analysis
The purpose of the engineering analysis is to establish the
relationship between the efficiency and cost of consumer air cleaners.
There are two elements to consider in the engineering analysis: The
selection of efficiency levels to analyze (i.e., the ``efficiency
analysis'') and the determination of product cost at each efficiency
level (i.e., the ``cost analysis''). In determining the performance of
higher-efficiency products, DOE considers technologies and design
option combinations not eliminated by the screening analysis. For each
product class, DOE estimates the baseline cost, as well as the
incremental cost for the product at efficiency levels above the
baseline. The output of the engineering analysis is a set of cost-
efficiency ``curves'' that are used in downstream analyses (i.e., the
life-cycle cost (``LCC'') analysis, payback period (``PBP'') analysis,
and the national impacts analysis (``NIA'')).
1. Efficiency Analysis
DOE typically uses one of two approaches to develop energy
efficiency levels for the engineering analysis: (1) Relying on observed
efficiency levels in the market (i.e., the efficiency-level approach),
or (2) determining the incremental efficiency improvements associated
with incorporating specific design options to a baseline model (i.e.,
the design-option approach). Using the efficiency-level approach, the
efficiency levels established for the analysis are determined based on
the market distribution of existing products (in other words, based on
the range of efficiencies and efficiency level ``clusters'' that
already exist on the market). Using the design option approach, the
efficiency levels established for the analysis are determined through
detailed engineering calculations and/or computer simulations of the
efficiency improvements from implementing specific design options that
have been identified in the technology assessment. DOE may also rely on
a combination of these two approaches. For example, the efficiency-
level approach (based on actual products on the market) may be extended
using the design option approach to interpolate to define ``gap fill''
levels (to bridge large gaps between other identified efficiency
levels) and/or to extrapolate to the max-tech level (particularly in
cases where the max-tech level exceeds the maximum efficiency level
currently available on the market).
For each product class DOE analyzes, DOE selects a baseline model
as a reference point against which any changes resulting from new or
amended energy conservation standards can be measured. The baseline
model in each product class represents the characteristics of common or
typical products in that class.
DOE requests feedback on appropriate baseline efficiency levels for
DOE to apply, and the product classes to which these baseline
efficiency levels would be applicable, in evaluating whether to
establish energy conservation standards for consumer air cleaners.
As part of DOE's analysis, the maximum available efficiency level
is the highest efficiency unit currently available on the market. DOE
defines a ``max-tech'' efficiency level to represent the theoretical
maximum possible efficiency if all available design options are
incorporated in a model. In applying these design options, DOE would
only include those options that are compatible with each other and that
when combined would represent the theoretical maximum possible
efficiency. Often, the max-tech efficiency level is not commercially
available because it is not economically feasible.
DOE seeks input on identifying the max-tech efficiency level for
consumer air cleaners. Additionally, for any max-tech efficiency level
identified by stakeholders, DOE also seeks input on whether such a max-
tech efficiency level would be appropriate and technologically feasible
for potential consideration as possible energy conservation standards
for consumer air cleaners, and if not, why not.
DOE seeks feedback on what design options would be incorporated at
a max-tech efficiency level, and the efficiencies associated with those
levels. As part of this request, DOE also seeks information as to
whether there are limitations on the use of certain combinations of
design options.
2. Cost Analysis
The cost analysis portion of the engineering analysis is conducted
using one or a combination of cost approaches. The selection of cost
approach depends on a suite of factors, including availability and
reliability of public information, characteristics of the regulated
product, and the availability and timeliness of purchasing the product
on the market.
[[Page 3713]]
The cost approaches are summarized as follows:
Physical teardowns: Under this approach, DOE physically
dismantles a commercially available product, component-by-component, to
develop a detailed bill of materials for the product.
Catalog teardowns: In lieu of physically deconstructing a
product, DOE identifies each component using parts diagrams (available
from manufacturer websites or appliance repair websites, for example)
to develop the bill of materials for the product.
Price surveys: If neither a physical nor catalog teardown
is feasible (for example, for tightly integrated products such as
fluorescent lamps, which are infeasible to disassemble and for which
parts diagrams are unavailable) or cost-prohibitive and otherwise
impractical (e.g., large commercial boilers), DOE conducts price
surveys using publicly available pricing data published on major online
retailer websites and/or by soliciting prices from distributors and
other commercial channels.
The resulting bill of materials provides the basis for the
manufacturer production cost (``MPC'') estimates. DOE then applies a
manufacturer markup to convert the MPC to manufacturer selling price
(``MSP''). The manufacturer markup accounts for costs such as overhead
and profit.
As described at the beginning of this section, the main outputs of
the engineering analysis are cost-efficiency relationships that
describe the estimated increases in manufacturer production cost
associated with higher-efficiency products for the analyzed product
classes.
DOE requests feedback on design options that manufacturers would
use to increase energy efficiency in consumer air cleaners above the
baseline. This includes information on the order in which manufacturers
would incorporate the different technologies to incrementally improve
efficiency of products. DOE also requests feedback on whether the
increased energy efficiency would lead to other design changes that
would not occur otherwise. DOE is also interested in information
regarding any potential impact of design options on a manufacturer's
ability to incorporate additional functions or attributes in response
to consumer demand.
DOE also seeks input on the increase in MPC associated with
incorporating each particular design option. DOE also requests
information on the investments necessary to incorporate specific design
options, including, but not limited to, costs related to new or
modified tooling (if any), materials, engineering and development
efforts to implement each design option, and manufacturing/production
impacts.
DOE requests comment on whether certain design options may not be
applicable to (or incompatible with) certain types of air cleaners.
D. Distribution Channels and Markups Analysis
DOE derives customer prices based on manufacturer markups as
discussed, as well as retailer markups, distributor markups, contractor
markups (where appropriate), and sales taxes. In deriving the retailer
and distributor markups, DOE determines the major distribution channels
for product sales, the markup associated with each party in each
distribution channel, and the existence and magnitude of differences
between markups for baseline products (``baseline markups'') and
higher-efficiency products (``incremental markups''). The identified
distribution channels (i.e., how the products are distributed from the
manufacturer to the consumer), and estimated relative sales volumes
through each channel are used in generating end-user price inputs for
the LCC analysis and NIA.
DOE requests data and information on typical manufacturer markups
for consumer air cleaners (i.e., the markup applied to the MPC to
determine MSP).
DOE requests information on the existence of any distribution
channels other than the retail outlet distribution channel that are
used to distribute consumer air cleaners into the market.
E. Energy Use Analysis
As part of the rulemaking process, DOE conducts an energy use
analysis to identify how consumers use products, and thereby determine
the energy savings potential of energy efficiency improvements. The
energy use analysis is meant to represent typical energy consumption in
the field. DOE will base the energy consumption of consumer air
cleaners on the annual energy consumption as determined by the DOE test
procedure.
1. Consumer Samples and Market Breakdowns
To estimate the energy use of products in field operating
conditions, DOE typically develops consumer samples that are
representative of installation and operating characteristics of how
such products are used in the field, as well as distributions of annual
energy use by application and market segment. In a potential energy
conservation standards rulemaking for consumer air cleaners, DOE may
utilize the most current version of the Residential Energy Consumption
Survey (``RECS'') published by the U.S. Energy Information
Administration (``EIA'') (currently the 2015 RECS) and the most current
version of the Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (``CBECS)
also published by EIA (currently the 2012 CBECS).
DOE requests data and information regarding market applications of
consumer air cleaners and how those are broken down by economic sector
(e.g., residential versus commercial).
2. Operating Hours
One of the key inputs to the energy use analysis is the number of
annual operating hours of the product.
As discussed, the ENERGY STAR database \20\ assumes that a consumer
air cleaner operates for 16 hours per day and is inactive for 8 hours
per day, corresponding to 5,840 active mode hours per year and 2,920
inactive mode hours annually.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See ENERGY STAR database for air cleaners at https://data.energystar.gov/dataset/ENERGY-STAR-Certified-Room-Air-Cleaners/jmck-i55n.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE requests data or published reports on the number of annual
operating hours of consumer air cleaners. In particular, DOE requests
data or published reports on whether the annual operating hours may
differ for any of the types of consumer air cleaners that would be
within the scope of DOE's proposed definition of consumer air cleaner.
F. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analyses
DOE conducts the LCC and the payback period (``PBP'') analyses to
evaluate the economic effects of potential energy conservation
standards for consumer air cleaners on individual customers. The
effects of more stringent energy conservation standards on a consumer
of consumer air cleaners include changes in operating expenses (usually
decreased) and changes in purchase prices (usually increased). For any
given efficiency level, DOE measures the PBP and the change in LCC
relative to an estimated baseline level. The LCC is the total customer
expense over the life of the product, consisting of purchase,
installation, and operating costs (expenses for energy use,
maintenance, and repair). Inputs to the calculation of total installed
cost include the cost of the product--which includes the MSP,
distribution channel markups, and sales taxes--and installation costs.
Inputs to the calculation of operating expenses include annual energy
consumption, energy prices and price projections, repair and
maintenance costs, product
[[Page 3714]]
lifetimes, discount rates, and the year that compliance with new and
amended standards is required.
DOE measures savings of potential standards relative to a ``no-new-
standards'' case that reflects conditions without new and/or amended
standards, and uses efficiency market shares to characterize the ``no-
new-standards'' case product mix. By accounting for consumers who
already purchase more efficient products, DOE avoids overstating the
potential benefits from potential standards.
DOE requests information on the current energy efficiency
distribution of consumer air cleaners.
DOE requests data and information on the installation costs of
consumer air cleaners, and whether those vary by product class or any
other factor affecting their efficiency.
G. Repair and Maintenance Costs
As noted, inputs to the calculation of operating expenses include
repair and maintenance costs, among other factors.
DOE requests feedback and data on whether maintenance costs differ
in comparison to the baseline maintenance costs for any air cleaner
technology options.
DOE requests information and data on the frequency of repair, and
repair and maintenance costs of consumer air cleaners. DOE is also
interested in the market share of consumers who simply replace the
products when they fail as opposed to repairing them, and factors that
affect whether consumers decide to repair or replace, such as income,
geographical location, or product replacement cost and repair costs.
H. Shipments
DOE develops shipments forecasts of products to calculate the
national impacts of potential new or amended energy conservation
standards on energy consumption, net present value (``NPV''), and
future manufacturer cash flows. DOE shipments projections are typically
based on available historical data categorized by product class,
capacity, and energy efficiency. Current sales estimates allow for a
more accurate model that captures recent trends in the market.
DOE requests annual sales data (i.e., number of shipments) of
consumer air cleaners from 2016 to 2020 disaggregated to the extent
possible by product class, capacity, energy efficiency level, or any
other differentiating factor used in the industry. For each class/
category, DOE also requests the fraction of sales that are ENERGY STAR-
qualified.
To project future shipments for the residential and commercial
sectors, DOE typically uses, respectively, new housing starts
projections and floorspace projections from the Annual Energy Outlook
(AEO) as market drivers.
DOE requests on the market drivers and saturation trends that would
help project shipments for consumer air cleaners.
I. National Impact Analysis
The purpose of the NIA is to estimate the aggregate economic
impacts of potential efficiency standards at the national level. The
NIA assesses the national energy savings (``NES'') and the national NPV
of total customer costs and savings that would be expected to result
from new or amended standards at specific efficiency levels.
A key component of DOE's estimates of NES and NPV is the equipment
energy efficiencies forecasted over time for the no-new-standards case
and for standards cases. DOE generally analyzes trends in market
efficiency to project the no-new standards case efficiency over the NIA
analysis period.
DOE seeks information on the expected efficiency trends in the
consumer air cleaner market.
J. Manufacturer Impact Analysis
The purpose of the manufacturer impact analysis (``MIA'') is to
estimate the financial impact of any new energy conservation standards
on manufacturers of consumer air cleaners, and to evaluate the
potential impact of such standards on direct employment and
manufacturing capacity. The MIA includes both quantitative and
qualitative aspects. The quantitative part of the MIA primarily relies
on the Government Regulatory Impact Model (``GRIM''), an industry cash-
flow model adapted for each product in this analysis, with the key
output of industry net present value (``INPV''). The qualitative part
of the MIA addresses the potential impacts of energy conservation
standards on manufacturing capacity and industry competition, as well
as factors such as product characteristics, impacts on particular
subgroups of firms, and important market and product trends.
As part of the MIA, DOE intends to analyze impacts of energy
conservation standards on subgroups of manufacturers of covered
products, including small business manufacturers. DOE uses the Small
Business Administration's (``SBA'') small business size standards to
determine whether manufacturers qualify as small businesses, which are
listed by the applicable North American Industry Classification System
(``NAICS'') code.\21\ Manufacturing of portable consumer air cleaners
is classified under NAICS 335210, ``Small Electrical Appliance
Manufacturing, whereas manufacturing of non-portable consumer air
cleaners is classified under NAICS 333413, ``Industrial and Commercial
Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing.'' The SBA
sets a threshold of 1,500 employees or less and 500 or less,
respectively, for a domestic entity to be considered as a small
business in these industry categories. These employee thresholds
include all employees in a business' parent company and any other
subsidiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Available online at www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One aspect of assessing manufacturer burden involves examining the
cumulative impact of multiple DOE standards and the product-specific
regulatory actions of other federal agencies that affect the
manufacturers of a covered product. While any one regulation may not
impose a significant burden on manufacturers, the combined effects of
several existing or impending regulations may have serious consequences
for some manufacturers, groups of manufacturers, or an entire industry.
Assessing the impact of a single regulation may overlook this
cumulative regulatory burden. In addition to energy conservation
standards, other regulations can significantly affect manufacturers'
financial operations. Multiple regulations affecting the same
manufacturer can strain profits and lead companies to abandon product
lines or markets with lower expected future returns than competing
products. For these reasons, DOE conducts an analysis of cumulative
regulatory burden as part of its rulemakings pertaining to appliance
efficiency.
To the extent feasible, DOE seeks the names and contact information
of any domestic or foreign-based manufacturers that distribute consumer
air cleaners in the United States.
In particular, DOE requests the names and contact information of
small businesses, as defined by the SBA's size threshold, that
manufacture consumer air cleaners in the United States. In addition,
DOE requests comment on any other manufacturer subgroups that could be
disproportionally impacted by any new energy conservation standards.
DOE requests feedback on any potential approaches that it could
consider to address impacts on manufacturers, including small
businesses.
[[Page 3715]]
DOE requests information regarding the cumulative regulatory burden
impacts on manufacturers of consumer air cleaners associated with (1)
other DOE standards applying to different products that these
manufacturers may also make and (2) product-specific regulatory actions
of other federal agencies. DOE also requests comment on its methodology
for computing cumulative regulatory burden and whether there are any
flexibilities it can consider that would reduce this burden while
remaining consistent with the requirements of EPCA.
IV. Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested parties to submit in writing by the date
specified under the DATES heading, comments and information on matters
addressed in this RFI and on other matters relevant to DOE's
consideration of establishing test procedure and energy conservation
standards for consumer air cleaners. These comments and information
will aid in the development of a test procedure NOPR and energy
conservation standard NOPR for consumer air cleaners in which DOE
determines that establishing test procedure and energy conservation
standards may be appropriate for these products.
Submitting comments via www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. Following this instruction, persons viewing comments will see
only first and last names, organization names, correspondence
containing comments, and any documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit information to www.regulations.gov for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (``CBI'')). Comments submitted
through www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Anyone submitting
comments through the website will waive any CBI claims for the
information submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email. Comments and documents submitted via
email also will be posted to www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not
include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information on a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it
does not include any comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. Faxes will not be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide only documents
that are: Not secured, written in English and free of any defects or
viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked
confidential including all the information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked ``non-confidential'' with the
information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE will make its own
determination about the confidential status of the information and
treat it according to its determination.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
DOE considers public participation to be a very important part of
the process for developing test procedures and energy conservation
standards. DOE actively encourages the participation and interaction of
the public during the comment period in each stage of this process.
Interactions with and between members of the public provide a balanced
discussion of the issues and assist DOE in the process. Anyone who
wishes to be added to the DOE mailing list to receive future notices
and information about this process should contact Appliance and
Equipment Standards Program staff at (202) 287-1445 or via email at
[email protected].
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on January 13,
2022, by Kelly J. Speakes-Backman, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, pursuant to delegated
authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original
signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes
only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 14, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022-01035 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P