Ethaboxam; Pesticide Tolerances, 2725-2728 [2022-00854]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Rules and Regulations • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is Name of non-regulatory SIP revision not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 21, 2022. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of Applicable geographic area State submittal date * * * Emissions Statement Certifi- Delaware’s portion of the Philacation for the 2015 Ozone delphia-Wilmington-Atlantic National Ambient Air QualCity, PA-NJ-MD-DE 2015 ity Standard. ozone NAAQS nonattainment area (i.e., New Castle County). [FR Doc. 2022–00976 Filed 1–18–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P * 8/3/20 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Fmt 4700 For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart I—Delaware 2. In § 52.420, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an entry for ‘‘Emissions Statement Certification for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard’’ at the end of the table to read as follows: ■ § 52.420 * Identification of plan. * * (e) * * * ACTION: * * Final rule. This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of ethaboxam in or on Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B and Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5–16. The Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR–4) requested these tolerance actions under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). SUMMARY: AGENCY: Frm 00053 Dated: January 10, 2022. Diana Esher, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. * * Certification that Delaware’s SIP-approved regulations under 7 DE Administrative Code 1117 Section 7.0 meet the emissions statements requirements of CAA Section 182(a)(3)(B) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PO 00000 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. * 1/19/2022, [insert Federal Register citation]. Ethaboxam; Pesticide Tolerances Jkt 256001 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Additional explanation [EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0045; FRL–9331–01– OCSPP] 16:00 Jan 18, 2022 such rule or action. This action approving Delaware’s emissions statement certification for the 2015 ozone NAAQS may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) EPA approval date 40 CFR Part 180 VerDate Sep<11>2014 2725 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM 19JAR1 2726 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Rules and Regulations This regulation is effective January 19, 2022. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before March 21, 2022, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0045, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305–5805. Due to the public health concerns relating to COVID–19, the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide customer service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status information on EPA/DC services, docket access, visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; main telephone number: (703) 305– 7090; email address: RDFRNotices@ epa.gov. DATES: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1 A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Jan 18, 2022 Jkt 256001 B. How can I get electronic access to other relatedinformation? II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA’s tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/ current/title-40. In the Federal Register of March 22, 2021 (86 FR 15162) (FRL–10021–44) EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 0E8871) by IR–4, North Carolina State University, 1730 Varsity Drive, Venture IV, Suite 210, Raleigh, NC 27606. The petition requested to establish tolerances in 40 CFR 180.622 for residues of the fungicide ethaboxam, (N-(cyano-2thienylmethyl)-4-ethyl-2-(ethylamino)5-thiazolecarboxamide) in or on Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B at 7 parts per million (ppm) and Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5–16 at 3 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by IR–4, the petitioner, which is available in the docket, https:// www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2021–0045 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before March 21, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 2021–0045, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/where-sendcomments-epa-dockets. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . . ’’ Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for ethaboxam including exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks associated with ethaboxam follows. In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal Register, E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM 19JAR1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Rules and Regulations EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been previously published for tolerance rulemakings of the same pesticide chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between tolerance rulemaking, and EPA considers referral back to those sections as sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA considered in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking. EPA has previously published tolerance rulemakings for ethaboxam, in which EPA concluded, based on the available information, that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm would result from aggregate exposure to ethaboxam and established tolerances for residues of that chemical. EPA is incorporating previously published sections from those rulemakings that remain unchanged as described further in this rulemaking. Toxicological profile. For a discussion of the Toxicological Profile of ethaboxam, see Unit III.A. of the ethaboxam tolerance rulemaking published in the Federal Register of August 3, 2017 (82 FR 36086) (FRL– 9961–69). Toxicological points of departure/ Levels of concern. For a summary of the Toxicological Points of Departure/ Levels of Concern for ethaboxam used for human risk assessment, see Unit III.B. of the August 3, 2017 ethaboxam tolerance rulemaking. Exposure assessment. Much of the exposure assessment remains unchanged from the previous rulemaking, although the exposure assessment has been updated to include the petitioned-for tolerances based on the same previous assumptions of tolerance level residues and 100 percent crop treated (PCT). Additionally, the estimated drinking water concentration is the same as that used in the previous assessment (7.4 ppb) for the chronic assessment (the only dietary assessment needed). There are no residential uses for ethaboxam, therefore no short- or intermediate-term exposure is expected. For a description of the previous approach to and assumptions for the exposure assessment, please reference Unit III.C. of the August 3, 2017 rulemaking. Safety factor for infants and children. EPA continues to conclude that there are reliable data to support the reduction of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor. See Unit III.D. of the August 3, 2017 rulemaking for a discussion of the Agency’s rationale for that determination. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Jan 18, 2022 Jkt 256001 Aggregate risks and Determination of safety. EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD) and chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD). Short-, intermediate-, and chronic risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the appropriate points of departure to ensure that an adequate margin of exposure (MOE) exists. For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate exposure. An acute endpoint attributable to a single dose exposure was not identified; therefore, an acute dietary risk assessment was not conducted. Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency’s level of concern of 100% of the cPAD; they are 39% of the cPAD for children 1 to 2 years old, the group with the highest estimated exposure. As the chronic dietary endpoint and dose are protective of potential cancer effects, ethaboxam is not expected to pose a dietary or aggregate cancer risk of concern. Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to infants and children, from aggregate exposure to ethaboxam residues. More detailed information on this action can be found in the document entitled, ‘‘Ethaboxam. Human Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed New Uses on Brassica Head and Stem Vegetable Crop Group 5–16 and Brassica Leafy Greens Crop Subgroup 4–16B’’ by going to the docket established by this action, EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0045. IV. Other Considerations A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology For a discussion of the available analytical enforcement method, see Unit IV.A. of the August 3, 2017 rulemaking. B. International Residue Limits In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). Codex does not have established MRLs for ethaboxam in commodities PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 2727 that are members of subgroup 4–16B or group 5–16. V. Conclusion Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of ethaboxam in or on Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B at 7 ppm and Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5–16 at 3 ppm. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or to Executive Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM 19JAR1 2728 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Rules and Regulations determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides, and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: December 29, 2021. Daniel Rosenblatt, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR chapter 1 as follows: PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. Amend § 180.622, by adding in alphabetical order to table 1 to paragraph (a) the entries ‘‘Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B’’ and ‘‘Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5–16’’ to read as follows: jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1 § 180.622 Ethaboxam; tolerances for residues. (a) * * * VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Jan 18, 2022 Jkt 256001 Parts per million Commodity * * * * Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B * * * * * Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5–16 ........................................... * * * * * 7 3 * [FR Doc. 2022–00854 Filed 1–18–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE 45 CFR Parts 1230 and 2554 RIN 3045–AA82 VII. Congressional Review Act ■ TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a) Annual Civil Monetary Penalties Inflation Adjustment Corporation for National and Community Service. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (operating as AmeriCorps) is updating its regulations to reflect required annual inflationrelated increases to the civil monetary penalties under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Act) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance. DATES: This rule is effective January 19, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kiara Rhodes, Office of General Counsel, at PublicComments@cns.gov or at 202–937–6965. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Background AmeriCorps, the operating name for Corporation for National and Community Service, is a Federal agency that engages millions of Americans in service. AmeriCorps members and AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers serve directly with nonprofit organizations to tackle our Nation’s most pressing challenges. For more information, visit americorps.gov. AmeriCorps has two civil monetary penalties in its regulations. A civil monetary penalty under the Act is a penalty, fine, or other sanction that: (1) Is for a specific monetary amount as provided by Federal law or has a maximum amount provided for by Federal law; and (2) is assessed or enforced by an agency pursuant to Federal law; and (3) is assessed or PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 enforced pursuant to an administrative proceeding or a civil action in the Federal courts. (See 28 U.S.C. 2461 note). A civil monetary penalty does not include a penalty levied for violation of a criminal statute, or fees for services, licenses, permits, or other regulatory review. The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Sec. 701 of Pub. L. 114–74) (the ‘‘Act’’) requires agencies to adjust their civil monetary penalties for inflation annually. This rule updates AmeriCorps’ two civil penalties for inflation. II. Method of Calculation The inflation adjustment for each applicable civil monetary penalty is determined using the percent increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI–U) for the month of October of the year in which the amount of each civil money penalty was most recently established or modified. See December 15, 2021, OMB Memo for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, M–22–07, Implementation of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2022, Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. The cost-of-living adjustment multiplier for 2022, based on the CPI–U for the month of October 2021, not seasonally adjusted, is 1.06222. The agency identified two civil penalties in its regulations: (1) The penalty associated with Restrictions on Lobbying (45 CFR 1230.400) and (2) the penalty associated with the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (45 CFR 2554.1): • The civil monetary penalties related to Restrictions on Lobbying (45 CFR 1230.400) range from $20,732 to $207,313. Using the 2022 multiplier, the new range of possible civil monetary penalties is from $22,022 to $220,212. • The Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (45 CFR 2554.1) civil monetary penalty has an upper limit of $11,803. Using the 2022 multiplier, the new upper limit of the civil monetary penalty is $12,537. III. Summary of Final Rule This final rule adjusts the civil monetary penalty amounts related to Restrictions on Lobbying (45 CFR 1230.400) and the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (45 CFR 2554.1). The range of civil monetary penalties related to Restrictions on Lobbying increase from ‘‘$20,732 to $207,313’’ to ‘‘$22,022 to $220,212.’’ The civil monetary penalties for the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM 19JAR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2725-2728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0045; FRL-9331-01-OCSPP]


Ethaboxam; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of 
ethaboxam in or on Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B and 
Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16. The Interregional 
Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested these tolerance actions 
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

[[Page 2726]]


DATES: This regulation is effective January 19, 2022. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before March 21, 2022, and 
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR 
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0045, is available at 
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection 
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., 
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The 
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
    Due to the public health concerns relating to COVID-19, the EPA 
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with 
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide customer service via 
email, phone, and webform. For the latest status information on EPA/DC 
services, docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director, 
Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, 
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other relatedinformation?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's 
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the 
Federal Register's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0045 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
March 21, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and 
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0045, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of March 22, 2021 (86 FR 15162) (FRL-10021-
44) EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 
0E8871) by IR-4, North Carolina State University, 1730 Varsity Drive, 
Venture IV, Suite 210, Raleigh, NC 27606. The petition requested to 
establish tolerances in 40 CFR 180.622 for residues of the fungicide 
ethaboxam, (N-(cyano-2-thienylmethyl)-4-ethyl-2-(ethylamino)-5-
thiazolecarboxamide) in or on Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B at 
7 parts per million (ppm) and Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 
5-16 at 3 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition 
prepared by IR-4, the petitioner, which is available in the docket, 
https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in 
response to the notice of filing.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a 
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a 
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure 
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary 
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable 
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in 
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. 
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . 
. ''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors 
specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and 
other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has 
sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on 
aggregate exposure for ethaboxam including exposure resulting from the 
tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures 
and risks associated with ethaboxam follows.
    In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal 
Register,

[[Page 2727]]

EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been previously 
published for tolerance rulemakings of the same pesticide chemical. 
Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical remains 
unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between 
tolerance rulemaking, and EPA considers referral back to those sections 
as sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA 
considered in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking.
    EPA has previously published tolerance rulemakings for ethaboxam, 
in which EPA concluded, based on the available information, that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm would result from aggregate 
exposure to ethaboxam and established tolerances for residues of that 
chemical. EPA is incorporating previously published sections from those 
rulemakings that remain unchanged as described further in this 
rulemaking.
    Toxicological profile. For a discussion of the Toxicological 
Profile of ethaboxam, see Unit III.A. of the ethaboxam tolerance 
rulemaking published in the Federal Register of August 3, 2017 (82 FR 
36086) (FRL-9961-69).
    Toxicological points of departure/Levels of concern. For a summary 
of the Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern for 
ethaboxam used for human risk assessment, see Unit III.B. of the August 
3, 2017 ethaboxam tolerance rulemaking.
    Exposure assessment. Much of the exposure assessment remains 
unchanged from the previous rulemaking, although the exposure 
assessment has been updated to include the petitioned-for tolerances 
based on the same previous assumptions of tolerance level residues and 
100 percent crop treated (PCT). Additionally, the estimated drinking 
water concentration is the same as that used in the previous assessment 
(7.4 ppb) for the chronic assessment (the only dietary assessment 
needed). There are no residential uses for ethaboxam, therefore no 
short- or intermediate-term exposure is expected. For a description of 
the previous approach to and assumptions for the exposure assessment, 
please reference Unit III.C. of the August 3, 2017 rulemaking.
    Safety factor for infants and children. EPA continues to conclude 
that there are reliable data to support the reduction of the Food 
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor. See Unit III.D. of the 
August 3, 2017 rulemaking for a discussion of the Agency's rationale 
for that determination.
    Aggregate risks and Determination of safety. EPA determines whether 
acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing 
aggregate exposure estimates to the acute population adjusted dose 
(aPAD) and chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD). Short-, 
intermediate-, and chronic risks are evaluated by comparing the 
estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the 
appropriate points of departure to ensure that an adequate margin of 
exposure (MOE) exists. For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the 
lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate 
exposure.
    An acute endpoint attributable to a single dose exposure was not 
identified; therefore, an acute dietary risk assessment was not 
conducted. Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency's level of 
concern of 100% of the cPAD; they are 39% of the cPAD for children 1 to 
2 years old, the group with the highest estimated exposure. As the 
chronic dietary endpoint and dose are protective of potential cancer 
effects, ethaboxam is not expected to pose a dietary or aggregate 
cancer risk of concern.
    Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described 
above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
result to the general population, or to infants and children, from 
aggregate exposure to ethaboxam residues. More detailed information on 
this action can be found in the document entitled, ``Ethaboxam. Human 
Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed New Uses on Brassica Head and 
Stem Vegetable Crop Group 5-16 and Brassica Leafy Greens Crop Subgroup 
4-16B'' by going to the docket established by this action, EPA-HQ-OPP-
2021-0045.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    For a discussion of the available analytical enforcement method, 
see Unit IV.A. of the August 3, 2017 rulemaking.

B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. 
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent 
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA 
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established 
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA 
section 408(b)(4).
    Codex does not have established MRLs for ethaboxam in commodities 
that are members of subgroup 4-16B or group 5-16.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of ethaboxam in 
or on Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B at 7 ppm and Vegetable, 
Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16 at 3 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in 
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or to Executive Order 13045, 
entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and 
Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not 
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it 
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, 
entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority 
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 
1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in 
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government 
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has

[[Page 2728]]

determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides, and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 29, 2021.
Daniel Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 
40 CFR chapter 1 as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. Amend Sec.  180.622, by adding in alphabetical order to table 1 to 
paragraph (a) the entries ``Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B'' 
and ``Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16'' to read as 
follows:


Sec.  180.622  Ethaboxam; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

                        Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Parts per
                          Commodity                              million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                * * * * *
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B.......................          7
 
                                * * * * *
Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16...............          3
 
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-00854 Filed 1-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.