Mount Rainier National Park; Fishing, 1374-1378 [2022-00231]
Download as PDF
1374
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2022 / Proposed Rules
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
ACTION:
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563—Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) will review all significant
rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance, dated
October 12, 1993, the approval of State
program and/or AML plan amendments
is exempted from OMB review under
Executive Order 12866. Executive Order
13563, which reaffirms and
supplements Executive Order 12866,
retains this exemption.
Other Laws and Executive Orders
Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program
amendment to OSMRE for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require
us to publish a notice in the Federal
Register indicating receipt of the
proposed amendment, its text or a
summary of its terms, and an
opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed
amendment after the close of the public
comment period and determine whether
the amendment should be approved,
approved in part, or not approved. At
that time, we will also make the
determinations and certifications
required by the various laws and
executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 926
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
David Berry,
Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 2022–00324 Filed 1–10–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Significance of the Park
[NPS–MORA–31539; PPPWMORAS1
PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
RIN 1024–AE66
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
The National Park Service
proposes to remove from the Code of
Federal Regulations special fishing
regulations for Mount Rainier National
Park, including those that restrict the
take of nonnative species. Instead, the
National Park Service would publish
closures and restrictions related to
fishing in the Superintendent’s
Compendium for the park. This action
would help implement a 2018 Fish
Management Plan that aims to conserve
native fish populations and restore
aquatic ecosystems by reducing or
eliminating nonnative fish.
DATES: Comments must be received by
11:59 EDT on March 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) 1024–AE66, by either of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail or hand deliver to: National
Park Service, Mount Rainier National
Park, Attn: Superintendent, 55210 238th
Avenue East, Ashford, WA 98304.
Instructions: Comments will not be
accepted by fax, email, or in any way
other than those specified above. All
submissions received must include the
words ‘‘National Park Service’’ or
‘‘NPS’’ and must include the docket
number or RIN (1024–AE66) for this
rulemaking. Comments received may be
posted without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to
www.regulations.gov and search for
‘‘1024–AE66.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Skerl, Chief of Natural and
Cultural Resources, Mount Rainier
National Park, National Park Service;
phone: (360) 569–2211; email: kevin_
skerl@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
36 CFR Part 7
Mount Rainier National Park; Fishing
AGENCY:
Proposed rule.
National Park Service, Interior.
Mount Rainier National Park
encompasses 236,381 acres in west
central Washington, on the western and
eastern slopes of the Cascade Range.
About 83 percent of the park is located
in Pierce County and 17 percent is
located in Lewis County. The park’s
northern boundary is approximately 65
miles southeast of the Seattle-Tacoma
metropolitan area and 65 miles west of
Yakima. The elevations of the park
range from about 1,400 feet at the
Tahoma Woods Administrative Site to
14,410 feet at the summit of Mount
Rainier. About two million people visit
the park annually, with most visitation
(75 percent) occurring between June and
September. In 1988, Congress
designated approximately 97 percent
(228,480 acres) of the park as wilderness
under the Washington Park Wilderness
Act.
The focal point of the park is Mount
Rainier, a towering snow- and icecovered volcano that is a prominent
landmark in the Pacific Northwest.
Mount Rainier is the second most
seismically active and most hazardous
volcano in the Cascade Range. The 26
major glaciers that flank the upper
mountain cover 35 square miles. Steep
glaciated valleys and ice carved peaks
dominate the park landscape. The
Carbon, Mowich, White, West Fork
White, Nisqually, South Puyallup, and
North Puyallup rivers and their
tributaries carry water from Mount
Rainier to the Puget Sound. The
Ohanapecosh and Muddy Fork Cowlitz
flow into the Cowlitz River and on into
the Columbia River. There are
approximately 470 mapped rivers and
streams, including approximately 383
perennial streams and 84 intermittent
streams. With very few exceptions, park
rivers and streams originate within the
park. There are approximately 382 lakes
and ponds, and over 3,000 acres of other
wetland types (e.g., mineral geothermal
springs, waterfalls) in the park.
Approximately 29 of these lakes are in
designated wilderness. Among those
waterbodies not in wilderness are the
Littorals Pond (White River watershed)
and Mowich and Tipsoo lakes.
Fish Resources in the Park
The following 15 fish species are
present in the rivers, streams and lakes
within the park. Of these, 8 are native
and 7 are nonnative.
No.
Scientific name
Common name
1 .........
2 .........
3 .........
Oncorhynchus mykiss ........................................
Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii ...............................
Salvelinus confluentus .......................................
rainbow trout ......................................................
coastal cutthroat trout ........................................
bull trout .............................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Jan 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
Occurrence
Native (in some locations).
Native.
Native.
11JAP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2022 / Proposed Rules
No.
Scientific name
Common name
4 .........
5 .........
6 .........
7 .........
8 .........
9 .........
10 .......
11 .......
12 .......
13 .......
14 .......
15 .......
Oncorhynchus kisutch .......................................
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ...............................
Oncorhynchus gorbuscha ..................................
Prosopium williamsoni .......................................
Cottus confusus .................................................
Cottus cognatus .................................................
Cottus rhotheus .................................................
Oncorhynchus clarkii bouvieri ............................
Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi ...............................
Salvelinus fontinalis ...........................................
Gasterosteus aculeatus .....................................
Oncorhynchus nerka ..........................................
coho salmon ......................................................
chinook salmon ..................................................
pink salmon ........................................................
mountain whitefish .............................................
shorthead sculpin ...............................................
slimy sculpin ......................................................
torrent sculpin ....................................................
Yellowstone cutthroat trout ................................
westslope cutthroat trout ...................................
brook trout ..........................................................
Alaskan stickleback, threespined stickleback ....
kokanee salmon .................................................
Fish populations naturally occur
within the park in the nine large valley
bottom rivers and their tributary
junctions up to natural fish barriers.
These rivers bear native fish
populations of bull trout (Salvelinus
confluentus), coastal cutthroat trout
(Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii), coho
salmon (O. kisutch), rainbow (steelhead)
trout (O. mykiss), Chinook salmon (O.
tshawytscha), pink salmon (O.
gorbuscha), mountain whitefish
(Prosopium williamsoni) and shorthead
sculpin (Cottus confusus). Nonnative
sculpins present in the rivers include
slimy sculpin (C. cognatus) and torrent
sculpin (C. rhotheus).
Prior to stocking efforts, there were no
naturally occurring fish populations in
any of the approximately 382 mapped
lakes and ponds in the park. With the
exception of those mentioned above,
most of the mapped streams were also
originally fishless. Early in the park’s
history, the National Park Service (NPS)
and others, including the state,
introduced nonnative stocks of rainbow
trout (O. mykiss), westslope cutthroat
trout (O. clarkii lewisi), Yellowstone
cutthroat trout (O. clarkii bouvieri),
brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), and
kokanee salmon (O. nerka) to enhance
recreational fishing. According to
unpublished park records, official
stocking occurred from 1915 through
1964 (49 years) in 38 streams, and from
1915 through 1972 (57 years) in 44
lakes. Stocking fish resulted in
reproducing populations of nonnative
fish in naturally fishless lakes. It also
resulted in reproducing populations of
nonnative fish in some rivers and
streams where they compete with native
fish. Additional unauthorized
introductions of nonnative fish,
including threespined stickleback
(Gasterosteus aculeatus), have occurred
since stocking ended. Reproducing
populations of nonnative fish are now
present in approximately 35 lakes and
all of the park watersheds, including
many streams and the nine major rivers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Jan 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
The presence of nonnative fish in the
park has had widespread adverse effects
on the distribution, abundance, age
structure, genetics and behavior of
native fish species, amphibians and
other aquatic life. Nonnative fish prey
on and compete with native fish,
particularly bull trout. As a result, over
time, populations of native fish within
and outside the park have likely
diminished where brook trout and other
nonnative fish populations have been
established. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) and National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) have listed
populations of bull trout, Chinook
salmon, and steelhead within the park
as threatened under the Endagered
Species Act (ESA). In 2010, the USFWS
designated approximately 30 miles of
streams in the park as bull trout critical
habitat. In 2015, the USFWS issued a
Bull Trout Recovery Plan that identified
actions the NPS should take to protect
bull trout within the park.
NPS Authority To Manage Fishing
The NPS has sole and exclusive
jurisdiction over the lands and waters
within Mount Rainier National Park. 16
U.S.C. 95. The park’s enabling act
directs the Secretary of the Interior,
acting through the NPS, to make such
regulations as the Secrerary deems
necessary or proper to care for the park,
including regulations that provide
against the wanton destruction of the
fish and game found within the park,
and against their capture or destruction
for the purposes of merchandise or
profit. 16 U.S.C. 92. The NPS
administers the park as a unit of the
National Park System and has the
authority to regulate the use of the park
as it considers necessary or proper. 54
U.S.C. 100751(a). This includes the
authority to regulate activities on water
located within the park that is subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States. 54
U.S.C. 100751(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1375
Occurrence
Native.
Native.
Native.
Native.
Native.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
NPS Management Framework for
Fishing
General NPS fishing regulations are
found in 36 CFR 2.3 and apply to all
units of the National Park System. For
example, § 2.3(d)(4) prohibits
commercial fishing in NPS units, except
where specifically authorized by
Federal statute. Recreational fishing is
allowed within NPS areas in accordance
with state law, provided that the state
law does not conflict with NPS fishing
regulations. 36 CFR 2.3(a). Special
fishing regulations are found in 36 CFR
part 7 and apply only in specific NPS
units that have promulgated special
regulations for this purpose. Other NPS
closures and restrictions related to
fishing are established by the
Superintendent under his or her
discretionary authority in 36 CFR 1.5.
This authority allows Superintenents to
close all or a portion of a park area to
a specific use or activity or impose
conditions or restrictions on a use or
activity. Pursuant to 36 CFR 1.7(b),
these actions are compiled and
maintained in what is commonly known
as the Superintendent’s Compendium,
which is typically available on the
unit’s website, and do not appear in 36
CFR. Actions taken by the
Superintendent under the authority in
36 CFR 1.5 may not conflict with
regulations found in the CFR, including
the general fishing regulations in § 2.3.
NPS Management of Fishing in the Park
Special fishing regulations for Mount
Rainier National Park are found in 36
CFR 7.5(a). These regulations were
issued in 1969 (34 FR 17520) and last
amended in 1976 (41 FR 14863). They
close the following areas of the park to
all fishing: (i) Tipsoo Lake; (ii) Shadow
Lake; (iii) Klickitat Creek above the
White River entrance water supply
intake; (iv) Laughingwater Creek above
the Ohanapecosh water supply intake;
(v) Frozen Lake; (vi) Reflection Lakes;
and (vii) Ipsut Creek above the Ipsut
Creek Campground water supply intake.
36 CFR 7.5(a)(1). Except for fishing with
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
1376
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2022 / Proposed Rules
artificial flies, the special regulations
also close the Ohanapecosh River and
its tributaries to all fishing. 36 CFR
7.5(a)(2). The regulations state that there
shall be no minimum size limit on fish
that may be possessed. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(3).
The regulations state that the daily catch
and possession limit for fish taken from
park waters shall be 6 pounds and 1
fish, not to exceed 12 fish. 36 CFR
7.5(a)(4).
Other closures and restrictions related
to fishing appear in the
Superintendent’s Compendium for the
park, which is available on the park’s
website at https://www.nps.gov/mora/
learn/management/lawsand
policies.htm. Several of these closures
and restrictions are intended to
conserve native fish species and reduce
or eliminate nonnative species. The
Compendium states that all native fish
species caught in streams must be
released, but that the retention of
kokanee and brook trout (both
nonnative species) is permitted with no
limit. The purpose of this action is to
protect native fish species by requiring
catch-and-release and to reduce
populations of nonnative species by
allowing them to be removed from the
park. The Compendium closes
Fryingpan Creek above the confluence
of the White River to all fishing. This
closure was established to protect native
fish species (bull trout, Chinook salmon,
and steelhead) that are listed as
threatened under the ESA. The
Compendium also closes Ghost Lake
and Edith Creek Basin above the
Paradise water supply to protect the
potable water supply for White River
and Paradise. The Compendium
establishes fishing seasons for streams
and rivers to protect the spawning
season of listed, native species. Where
fishing is allowed in lakes, there are no
seasonal closures because, as noted
above, fish are not native to lakes within
the park.
In September 2017, the NPS
published a Fish Management Plan/
Environmental Assessment (the Plan).
The purpose of the Plan is to direct
long-term management for fish within
lakes, rivers and streams within the
park. During the development of the
Plan, the NPS solicited information
from the USFWS, the NMFS, the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife, the Washington State Historic
Preservation Office, and six affiliated
American Indian tribes: The Nisqually
Tribe of Indians, the Muckleshoot
Indian Tribe, the Cowlitz Indian Tribe,
the Puyallup Tribe of Indians, the
Squaxin Island Tribe, and the
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the
Yakama Nation. The U.S. Forest Service,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Jan 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National
Forest, also submitted comments during
the public scoping period that occurred
before the Plan was published. The Plan
was open for a 30-day public comment
period.
On August 28, 2018, the Regional
Director for Department of the Interior
Unified Regions 8, 9, and 10 (formerly
the Pacific West Region) approved a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) selecting Alternative 2 in the
Plan for implementation. This
alternative calls for site-specific
management actions to encourage
recreational fishing opportunities for
nonnative species and to protect native
fish and habitat. In addition to
increasing recreational angling
opportunities for nonnative species, the
alternative calls for suppressing or
eradicating nonnative fish populations
through administrative actions such as
gillnetting, seining, electrofishing, and
piscicides in selected locations. The
selected alternative is consistent with
actions required by the 2015 Bull Trout
Recovery Plan issued by the USFWS.
The NPS expects the eradication or
suppression of nonnative fish to result
in the increased survival and abundance
of threatened and endangered species
(bull trout, chinook salmon and
steelhead) and improved habitat for
native species. The Plan, which
contains a full description of the
purpose and need for taking action, the
alternatives considered, and the
environmental impacts associated with
the considered alternatives, and the
FONSI may be viewed on the park’s
planning website at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking
on the link entitled ‘‘2018 Mount
Rainier National Park Fisheries
Management Plan Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact’’ and then clicking
on the link entitled ‘‘Document List.’’
Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would remove
special fishing regulations for the park
that interfere with the successful
implementation of the fish management
strategy identified in the FONSI. These
include the following closures and
restrictions that limit the take of
nonnative fish: (1) Closures at Ipsut
Creek and (except for artificial
flyfishing) the Ohanapecosh River; and
(2) a daily catch and possession limit of
six pounds and one fish, not to exceed
12 fish. Removing these closures and
restrictions would create new angling
opportunities for nonnative species that
are currently not authorized by 36 CFR
7.5. The other closures and restrictions
currently codified in the special
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulations will be relocated to and
maintained in the Superintendent’s
Compendium because either they are
necessary to protect the domestic
potable water supply for White River,
Sunrise, Ohanapecosh, and Paradise
(the closures of Frozen Lake and streams
with identified water supply intakes); or
to protect fragile riparian vegetation (the
closures of Tipsoo Lake, Shadow Lake
and Reflection Lakes). Closures and
restrictions in the special regulations
also apply to the take of native fish
species. These will be retained or
modified in the Superintendent’s
Compendium, consistent with the
selected alternative in the FONSI, to
help restore the natural abundance,
diversity, dynamics, distribution,
habitats and behaviors of native fish
populations that were present in the
park prior to the introduction of
nonnative fish. The administrative
flexibility offered by the
Superintendent’s Compendium, which
in most circumstances can be modified
without notice and comment
rulemaking (see 36 CFR 1.5(b)), provides
a feasible and responsive method to
meet the strategic goals identified in the
FONSI to utilize adaptive management
to alter management activities when
needed based on monitoring and best
available science. NPS regulations at 36
CFR 1.7(b) require the Superintendent
to update the Compendium at least
annually. The NPS will ensure that the
public has an opportunity to provide
meaningful input prior to updating any
closures or restrictions related to fishing
in the Compendium.
Consolidating all fishing closures and
restrictions in the Compendium will
make them more accessible and userfriendly for the public. Instead of having
to look in two different places (the
special regulations in 36 CFR 7.5 and
the Superintendent’s Compendium on
the park’s website), the public would be
able to find all closures and restrictions
related to fishing in one place. The NPS
has already done this, informally, by
producing a fishing pamphlet that is
available at the park’s website at https://
www.nps.gov/mora/planyourvisit/
fishing-and-boating.htm. Moving all of
the closures and restrictions related to
fishing into the Compendium would
consolidate the official versions of them
in one place for legal purposes.
Centralizing them in the Compendium
would increase compliance, strengthen
enforcement, and decrease public
confusion and frustration. The NPS
routinely responds to inquiries and
requests for clarification from the State
of Washington and members of the
public regarding fishing opportunites
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2022 / Proposed Rules
and rules within the park. Placing all
fishing closures and restrictions in the
Compendium would make it easier for
visitors to understand the rules and
become better stewards of fishery
resource at the park. In order to direct
the public to the Compendium, the NPS
proposes to replace the existing
language in paragraph (a) of § 7.5 with
a general statement that the
Superintendent will establish fishing
closures and restrictions, based on
management objectives described in the
park’s resource management plans, in
accordance with the criteria and
procedures in 36 CFR 1.5 and 1.7,
including publication in the
Superintendent’s Compendium. The
rule would also state that fishing in
closed waters or violating a fishing
restriction established by the
Superintendent is prohibited. Similar
language is used in the special
regulations for other NPS units,
including Glacier National Park (36 CFR
7.3) and Rocky Mountain National Park
(36 CFR 7.7).
Compliance With Other Laws,
Executive Orders and Department
Policy
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
Nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
Executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Jan 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
This certification is based on
information contained in the economic
analyses found in the report entitled
‘‘Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility
Threshold Analyses: Proposed Rule to
Remove Special Regulations for Fishing
at Mount Rainier National Park.’’ The
document may be viewed on the park’s
planning website at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking
on the link entitled ‘‘2018 Mount
Rainier National Park Fisheries
Management Plan Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact’’ and then clicking
on the link entitled ‘‘Document List.’’
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2). This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule would not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule would not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. It
addresses public use of national park
lands, and imposes no requirements on
other agencies or governments. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule would not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
takings implications under Executive
Order 12630. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, the rule would
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. This proposed rule only
affects use of federally-administered
lands and waters. It has no outside
effects on other areas. A federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1377
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
This rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
criteria in Executive Order 13175 and
under the Department’s tribal
consultation policy and have
determined that tribal consultation is
not required because the rule will have
no substantial direct effect on federally
recognized Indian tribes. During scoping
for the Plan, the NPS solicited
comments from six affiliated American
Indian tribes: The Nisqually Tribe of
Indians, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe,
the Cowlitz Indian Tribe, the Puyallup
Tribe of Indians, the Squaxin Island
Tribe, and the Confederated Tribes and
Bands of the Yakama Nation. The NPS
will continue to work with these tribes
throughout the rulemaking process and
implementation of the selection action
in the Plan.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required. We may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
The NPS has prepared the Plan to
determine whether this rule will have a
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment under the NEPA.
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the NEPA is
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1378
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2022 / Proposed Rules
not required because of the FONSI. A
copy of the Plan and FONSI may be
viewed on the park’s planning website
at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora
by clicking on the link entitled ‘‘2018
Mount Rainier National Park Fisheries
Management Plan Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact’’ and then clicking
on the link entitled ‘‘Document List.’’
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Clarity of This Rule
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and 12988
(section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section
1(a)), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of
the Interior, whenever practicable, to
afford the public an opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking process.
Accordingly, interested persons may
submit written comments regarding this
proposed rule by one of the methods
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
document.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Jan 10, 2022
Jkt 256001
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
Coast Guard
District of Columbia, National parks,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
46 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. USCG–2018–0538]
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service proposes to
amend 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
RIN 1625–AC55
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
AGENCY:
1. The authority for part 7 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751,
320102; Sec. 7.96 also issued under D.C.
Code 10–137 and D.C. Code 50–2201.07.
2. In § 7.5, revise paragraph (a) to read
as follows:
■
§ 7.5
Mount Rainier National Park.
(a) Fishing. (1) Fishing closures and
restrictions, based on management
objectives for the preservation of the
park’s natural resources, are established
by the Superintendent.
(2) The Superintendent may establish
closures and restrictions, in accordance
with the criteria and procedures of § 1.5
of this chapter, on any activity
pertaining to fishing, including, but not
limited to species of fish that may be
taken, seasons and hours during which
fishing may take place, methods of
taking, and size, creel, and possession
limits.
(3) Except in emergency situations,
the Superintendent will notify the
public of any such closures or
restrictions through one or more
methods listed in § 1.7 of this chapter,
including publication in the
Superintendent’s Compendium (or
written compilation) of discretionary
actions referred to paragraph (b) of § 1.7.
(4) Fishing in closed waters or
violating a condition or restriction
established by the Superintendent
under this paragraph (a) is prohibited.
*
*
*
*
*
Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 2022–00231 Filed 1–10–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
User Fees for Inspected Towing
Vessels
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard is proposing
to update its user fees for seagoing
towing vessels that are 300 gross tons or
more and to revise user fees for other
inspected towing vessels. The Coast
Guard is proposing these updates
because we are required to establish and
maintain a fair fee for our vessel
inspection services and to separate the
fees for inspection options that involve
third-party auditors and surveyors from
inspection options that do not involve
third parties. Under this proposed rule,
vessels using the Alternate Compliance
Program, Streamlined Inspection
Program, or the Towing Safety
Management System options would pay
a lower fee than vessels that use the
traditional Coast Guard inspection
option.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 11, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0538 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about this document call or
email Mr. Scott Kuhaneck, Coast Guard;
telephone 202–372–1221, email
Thomas.S.Kuhaneck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
II. Abbreviations
III. Basis and Purpose
A. The Problem We Seek To Address
B. Legal Authority To Address This
Problem
C. Recent Legislation
IV. Background
A. Origins of Annual Vessel Inspection
Fees
B. Current Fees for Subchapter I and
Subchapter M Towing Vessels
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1374-1378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00231]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS-MORA-31539; PPPWMORAS1 PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
RIN 1024-AE66
Mount Rainier National Park; Fishing
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service proposes to remove from the Code of
Federal Regulations special fishing regulations for Mount Rainier
National Park, including those that restrict the take of nonnative
species. Instead, the National Park Service would publish closures and
restrictions related to fishing in the Superintendent's Compendium for
the park. This action would help implement a 2018 Fish Management Plan
that aims to conserve native fish populations and restore aquatic
ecosystems by reducing or eliminating nonnative fish.
DATES: Comments must be received by 11:59 EDT on March 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) 1024-AE66, by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail or hand deliver to: National Park Service, Mount
Rainier National Park, Attn: Superintendent, 55210 238th Avenue East,
Ashford, WA 98304.
Instructions: Comments will not be accepted by fax, email, or in
any way other than those specified above. All submissions received must
include the words ``National Park Service'' or ``NPS'' and must include
the docket number or RIN (1024-AE66) for this rulemaking. Comments
received may be posted without change to www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to www.regulations.gov and search for ``1024-
AE66.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Skerl, Chief of Natural and
Cultural Resources, Mount Rainier National Park, National Park Service;
phone: (360) 569-2211; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Significance of the Park
Mount Rainier National Park encompasses 236,381 acres in west
central Washington, on the western and eastern slopes of the Cascade
Range. About 83 percent of the park is located in Pierce County and 17
percent is located in Lewis County. The park's northern boundary is
approximately 65 miles southeast of the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan
area and 65 miles west of Yakima. The elevations of the park range from
about 1,400 feet at the Tahoma Woods Administrative Site to 14,410 feet
at the summit of Mount Rainier. About two million people visit the park
annually, with most visitation (75 percent) occurring between June and
September. In 1988, Congress designated approximately 97 percent
(228,480 acres) of the park as wilderness under the Washington Park
Wilderness Act.
The focal point of the park is Mount Rainier, a towering snow- and
ice-covered volcano that is a prominent landmark in the Pacific
Northwest. Mount Rainier is the second most seismically active and most
hazardous volcano in the Cascade Range. The 26 major glaciers that
flank the upper mountain cover 35 square miles. Steep glaciated valleys
and ice carved peaks dominate the park landscape. The Carbon, Mowich,
White, West Fork White, Nisqually, South Puyallup, and North Puyallup
rivers and their tributaries carry water from Mount Rainier to the
Puget Sound. The Ohanapecosh and Muddy Fork Cowlitz flow into the
Cowlitz River and on into the Columbia River. There are approximately
470 mapped rivers and streams, including approximately 383 perennial
streams and 84 intermittent streams. With very few exceptions, park
rivers and streams originate within the park. There are approximately
382 lakes and ponds, and over 3,000 acres of other wetland types (e.g.,
mineral geothermal springs, waterfalls) in the park. Approximately 29
of these lakes are in designated wilderness. Among those waterbodies
not in wilderness are the Littorals Pond (White River watershed) and
Mowich and Tipsoo lakes.
Fish Resources in the Park
The following 15 fish species are present in the rivers, streams
and lakes within the park. Of these, 8 are native and 7 are nonnative.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Scientific name Common name Occurrence
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1........ Oncorhynchus mykiss.. rainbow trout........ Native (in some
locations).
2........ Oncorhynchus clarkii coastal cutthroat Native.
clarkii. trout.
3........ Salvelinus bull trout........... Native.
confluentus.
[[Page 1375]]
4........ Oncorhynchus kisutch. coho salmon.......... Native.
5........ Oncorhynchus chinook salmon....... Native.
tshawytscha.
6........ Oncorhynchus pink salmon.......... Native.
gorbuscha.
7........ Prosopium williamsoni mountain whitefish... Native.
8........ Cottus confusus...... shorthead sculpin.... Native.
9........ Cottus cognatus...... slimy sculpin........ Nonnative.
10....... Cottus rhotheus...... torrent sculpin...... Nonnative.
11....... Oncorhynchus clarkii Yellowstone cutthroat Nonnative.
bouvieri. trout.
12....... Oncorhynchus clarkii westslope cutthroat Nonnative.
lewisi. trout.
13....... Salvelinus fontinalis brook trout.......... Nonnative.
14....... Gasterosteus Alaskan stickleback, Nonnative.
aculeatus. threespined
stickleback.
15....... Oncorhynchus nerka... kokanee salmon....... Nonnative.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish populations naturally occur within the park in the nine large
valley bottom rivers and their tributary junctions up to natural fish
barriers. These rivers bear native fish populations of bull trout
(Salvelinus confluentus), coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii
clarkii), coho salmon (O. kisutch), rainbow (steelhead) trout (O.
mykiss), Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha), pink salmon (O. gorbuscha),
mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) and shorthead sculpin
(Cottus confusus). Nonnative sculpins present in the rivers include
slimy sculpin (C. cognatus) and torrent sculpin (C. rhotheus).
Prior to stocking efforts, there were no naturally occurring fish
populations in any of the approximately 382 mapped lakes and ponds in
the park. With the exception of those mentioned above, most of the
mapped streams were also originally fishless. Early in the park's
history, the National Park Service (NPS) and others, including the
state, introduced nonnative stocks of rainbow trout (O. mykiss),
westslope cutthroat trout (O. clarkii lewisi), Yellowstone cutthroat
trout (O. clarkii bouvieri), brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), and
kokanee salmon (O. nerka) to enhance recreational fishing. According to
unpublished park records, official stocking occurred from 1915 through
1964 (49 years) in 38 streams, and from 1915 through 1972 (57 years) in
44 lakes. Stocking fish resulted in reproducing populations of
nonnative fish in naturally fishless lakes. It also resulted in
reproducing populations of nonnative fish in some rivers and streams
where they compete with native fish. Additional unauthorized
introductions of nonnative fish, including threespined stickleback
(Gasterosteus aculeatus), have occurred since stocking ended.
Reproducing populations of nonnative fish are now present in
approximately 35 lakes and all of the park watersheds, including many
streams and the nine major rivers.
The presence of nonnative fish in the park has had widespread
adverse effects on the distribution, abundance, age structure, genetics
and behavior of native fish species, amphibians and other aquatic life.
Nonnative fish prey on and compete with native fish, particularly bull
trout. As a result, over time, populations of native fish within and
outside the park have likely diminished where brook trout and other
nonnative fish populations have been established. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
have listed populations of bull trout, Chinook salmon, and steelhead
within the park as threatened under the Endagered Species Act (ESA). In
2010, the USFWS designated approximately 30 miles of streams in the
park as bull trout critical habitat. In 2015, the USFWS issued a Bull
Trout Recovery Plan that identified actions the NPS should take to
protect bull trout within the park.
NPS Authority To Manage Fishing
The NPS has sole and exclusive jurisdiction over the lands and
waters within Mount Rainier National Park. 16 U.S.C. 95. The park's
enabling act directs the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the
NPS, to make such regulations as the Secrerary deems necessary or
proper to care for the park, including regulations that provide against
the wanton destruction of the fish and game found within the park, and
against their capture or destruction for the purposes of merchandise or
profit. 16 U.S.C. 92. The NPS administers the park as a unit of the
National Park System and has the authority to regulate the use of the
park as it considers necessary or proper. 54 U.S.C. 100751(a). This
includes the authority to regulate activities on water located within
the park that is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. 54
U.S.C. 100751(b).
NPS Management Framework for Fishing
General NPS fishing regulations are found in 36 CFR 2.3 and apply
to all units of the National Park System. For example, Sec. 2.3(d)(4)
prohibits commercial fishing in NPS units, except where specifically
authorized by Federal statute. Recreational fishing is allowed within
NPS areas in accordance with state law, provided that the state law
does not conflict with NPS fishing regulations. 36 CFR 2.3(a). Special
fishing regulations are found in 36 CFR part 7 and apply only in
specific NPS units that have promulgated special regulations for this
purpose. Other NPS closures and restrictions related to fishing are
established by the Superintendent under his or her discretionary
authority in 36 CFR 1.5. This authority allows Superintenents to close
all or a portion of a park area to a specific use or activity or impose
conditions or restrictions on a use or activity. Pursuant to 36 CFR
1.7(b), these actions are compiled and maintained in what is commonly
known as the Superintendent's Compendium, which is typically available
on the unit's website, and do not appear in 36 CFR. Actions taken by
the Superintendent under the authority in 36 CFR 1.5 may not conflict
with regulations found in the CFR, including the general fishing
regulations in Sec. 2.3.
NPS Management of Fishing in the Park
Special fishing regulations for Mount Rainier National Park are
found in 36 CFR 7.5(a). These regulations were issued in 1969 (34 FR
17520) and last amended in 1976 (41 FR 14863). They close the following
areas of the park to all fishing: (i) Tipsoo Lake; (ii) Shadow Lake;
(iii) Klickitat Creek above the White River entrance water supply
intake; (iv) Laughingwater Creek above the Ohanapecosh water supply
intake; (v) Frozen Lake; (vi) Reflection Lakes; and (vii) Ipsut Creek
above the Ipsut Creek Campground water supply intake. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(1).
Except for fishing with
[[Page 1376]]
artificial flies, the special regulations also close the Ohanapecosh
River and its tributaries to all fishing. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(2). The
regulations state that there shall be no minimum size limit on fish
that may be possessed. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(3). The regulations state that the
daily catch and possession limit for fish taken from park waters shall
be 6 pounds and 1 fish, not to exceed 12 fish. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(4).
Other closures and restrictions related to fishing appear in the
Superintendent's Compendium for the park, which is available on the
park's website at https://www.nps.gov/mora/learn/management/lawsandpolicies.htm. Several of these closures and restrictions are
intended to conserve native fish species and reduce or eliminate
nonnative species. The Compendium states that all native fish species
caught in streams must be released, but that the retention of kokanee
and brook trout (both nonnative species) is permitted with no limit.
The purpose of this action is to protect native fish species by
requiring catch-and-release and to reduce populations of nonnative
species by allowing them to be removed from the park. The Compendium
closes Fryingpan Creek above the confluence of the White River to all
fishing. This closure was established to protect native fish species
(bull trout, Chinook salmon, and steelhead) that are listed as
threatened under the ESA. The Compendium also closes Ghost Lake and
Edith Creek Basin above the Paradise water supply to protect the
potable water supply for White River and Paradise. The Compendium
establishes fishing seasons for streams and rivers to protect the
spawning season of listed, native species. Where fishing is allowed in
lakes, there are no seasonal closures because, as noted above, fish are
not native to lakes within the park.
In September 2017, the NPS published a Fish Management Plan/
Environmental Assessment (the Plan). The purpose of the Plan is to
direct long-term management for fish within lakes, rivers and streams
within the park. During the development of the Plan, the NPS solicited
information from the USFWS, the NMFS, the Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife, the Washington State Historic Preservation Office, and
six affiliated American Indian tribes: The Nisqually Tribe of Indians,
the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, the Cowlitz Indian Tribe, the Puyallup
Tribe of Indians, the Squaxin Island Tribe, and the Confederated Tribes
and Bands of the Yakama Nation. The U.S. Forest Service, Mount Baker-
Snoqualmie National Forest, also submitted comments during the public
scoping period that occurred before the Plan was published. The Plan
was open for a 30-day public comment period.
On August 28, 2018, the Regional Director for Department of the
Interior Unified Regions 8, 9, and 10 (formerly the Pacific West
Region) approved a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) selecting
Alternative 2 in the Plan for implementation. This alternative calls
for site-specific management actions to encourage recreational fishing
opportunities for nonnative species and to protect native fish and
habitat. In addition to increasing recreational angling opportunities
for nonnative species, the alternative calls for suppressing or
eradicating nonnative fish populations through administrative actions
such as gillnetting, seining, electrofishing, and piscicides in
selected locations. The selected alternative is consistent with actions
required by the 2015 Bull Trout Recovery Plan issued by the USFWS. The
NPS expects the eradication or suppression of nonnative fish to result
in the increased survival and abundance of threatened and endangered
species (bull trout, chinook salmon and steelhead) and improved habitat
for native species. The Plan, which contains a full description of the
purpose and need for taking action, the alternatives considered, and
the environmental impacts associated with the considered alternatives,
and the FONSI may be viewed on the park's planning website at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking on the link entitled ``2018 Mount
Rainier National Park Fisheries Management Plan Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact'' and then clicking on
the link entitled ``Document List.''
Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would remove special fishing regulations for the
park that interfere with the successful implementation of the fish
management strategy identified in the FONSI. These include the
following closures and restrictions that limit the take of nonnative
fish: (1) Closures at Ipsut Creek and (except for artificial
flyfishing) the Ohanapecosh River; and (2) a daily catch and possession
limit of six pounds and one fish, not to exceed 12 fish. Removing these
closures and restrictions would create new angling opportunities for
nonnative species that are currently not authorized by 36 CFR 7.5. The
other closures and restrictions currently codified in the special
regulations will be relocated to and maintained in the Superintendent's
Compendium because either they are necessary to protect the domestic
potable water supply for White River, Sunrise, Ohanapecosh, and
Paradise (the closures of Frozen Lake and streams with identified water
supply intakes); or to protect fragile riparian vegetation (the
closures of Tipsoo Lake, Shadow Lake and Reflection Lakes). Closures
and restrictions in the special regulations also apply to the take of
native fish species. These will be retained or modified in the
Superintendent's Compendium, consistent with the selected alternative
in the FONSI, to help restore the natural abundance, diversity,
dynamics, distribution, habitats and behaviors of native fish
populations that were present in the park prior to the introduction of
nonnative fish. The administrative flexibility offered by the
Superintendent's Compendium, which in most circumstances can be
modified without notice and comment rulemaking (see 36 CFR 1.5(b)),
provides a feasible and responsive method to meet the strategic goals
identified in the FONSI to utilize adaptive management to alter
management activities when needed based on monitoring and best
available science. NPS regulations at 36 CFR 1.7(b) require the
Superintendent to update the Compendium at least annually. The NPS will
ensure that the public has an opportunity to provide meaningful input
prior to updating any closures or restrictions related to fishing in
the Compendium.
Consolidating all fishing closures and restrictions in the
Compendium will make them more accessible and user-friendly for the
public. Instead of having to look in two different places (the special
regulations in 36 CFR 7.5 and the Superintendent's Compendium on the
park's website), the public would be able to find all closures and
restrictions related to fishing in one place. The NPS has already done
this, informally, by producing a fishing pamphlet that is available at
the park's website at https://www.nps.gov/mora/planyourvisit/fishing-and-boating.htm. Moving all of the closures and restrictions related to
fishing into the Compendium would consolidate the official versions of
them in one place for legal purposes. Centralizing them in the
Compendium would increase compliance, strengthen enforcement, and
decrease public confusion and frustration. The NPS routinely responds
to inquiries and requests for clarification from the State of
Washington and members of the public regarding fishing opportunites
[[Page 1377]]
and rules within the park. Placing all fishing closures and
restrictions in the Compendium would make it easier for visitors to
understand the rules and become better stewards of fishery resource at
the park. In order to direct the public to the Compendium, the NPS
proposes to replace the existing language in paragraph (a) of Sec. 7.5
with a general statement that the Superintendent will establish fishing
closures and restrictions, based on management objectives described in
the park's resource management plans, in accordance with the criteria
and procedures in 36 CFR 1.5 and 1.7, including publication in the
Superintendent's Compendium. The rule would also state that fishing in
closed waters or violating a fishing restriction established by the
Superintendent is prohibited. Similar language is used in the special
regulations for other NPS units, including Glacier National Park (36
CFR 7.3) and Rocky Mountain National Park (36 CFR 7.7).
Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders and Department Policy
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the Nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The Executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is based on information
contained in the economic analyses found in the report entitled ``Cost-
Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Threshold Analyses: Proposed Rule to
Remove Special Regulations for Fishing at Mount Rainier National
Park.'' The document may be viewed on the park's planning website at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking on the link entitled
``2018 Mount Rainier National Park Fisheries Management Plan
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact'' and
then clicking on the link entitled ``Document List.''
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule would not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule would not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public
use of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other
agencies or governments. A statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is
not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have takings implications under Executive Order 12630. A
takings implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule
would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. This proposed
rule only affects use of federally-administered lands and waters. It
has no outside effects on other areas. A federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
This rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 and under the
Department's tribal consultation policy and have determined that tribal
consultation is not required because the rule will have no substantial
direct effect on federally recognized Indian tribes. During scoping for
the Plan, the NPS solicited comments from six affiliated American
Indian tribes: The Nisqually Tribe of Indians, the Muckleshoot Indian
Tribe, the Cowlitz Indian Tribe, the Puyallup Tribe of Indians, the
Squaxin Island Tribe, and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the
Yakama Nation. The NPS will continue to work with these tribes
throughout the rulemaking process and implementation of the selection
action in the Plan.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act is not required. We may not conduct or sponsor and you
are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
The NPS has prepared the Plan to determine whether this rule will
have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment under
the NEPA. This rule does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the NEPA is
[[Page 1378]]
not required because of the FONSI. A copy of the Plan and FONSI may be
viewed on the park's planning website at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking on the link entitled ``2018 Mount Rainier National
Park Fisheries Management Plan Environmental Assessment and Finding of
No Significant Impact'' and then clicking on the link entitled
``Document List.''
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Clarity of This Rule
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful,
etc.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of the Interior, whenever
practicable, to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. Accordingly, interested persons may submit written
comments regarding this proposed rule by one of the methods listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
District of Columbia, National parks, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service
proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
0
1. The authority for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, 320102; Sec. 7.96 also
issued under D.C. Code 10-137 and D.C. Code 50-2201.07.
0
2. In Sec. 7.5, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.5 Mount Rainier National Park.
(a) Fishing. (1) Fishing closures and restrictions, based on
management objectives for the preservation of the park's natural
resources, are established by the Superintendent.
(2) The Superintendent may establish closures and restrictions, in
accordance with the criteria and procedures of Sec. 1.5 of this
chapter, on any activity pertaining to fishing, including, but not
limited to species of fish that may be taken, seasons and hours during
which fishing may take place, methods of taking, and size, creel, and
possession limits.
(3) Except in emergency situations, the Superintendent will notify
the public of any such closures or restrictions through one or more
methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of this chapter, including publication in
the Superintendent's Compendium (or written compilation) of
discretionary actions referred to paragraph (b) of Sec. 1.7.
(4) Fishing in closed waters or violating a condition or
restriction established by the Superintendent under this paragraph (a)
is prohibited.
* * * * *
Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2022-00231 Filed 1-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P