Corrected Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Oil Pollution and Clean Water Acts, 255-256 [2021-28497]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2022 / Notices
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Revision of an approved collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
National Incident-Based Reporting
System.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The form number is 1110–0058. The
applicable component within the DOJ is
the CJIS Division of the FBI.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Federal, state, local, and
tribal law enforcement agencies (LEAs).
Abstract: Under Title 28, United
States Code (U.S.C.), section (§ ) 534,
subsections (a) and (c); the Uniform
Federal Crime Reporting Act of 1988, 34
U.S.C. 41303; the Hate Crime Statistics
Act, 34 U.S.C. 41305, modified by the
Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr.,
Hate Crimes Prevention Act (2009),
Public Law (Pub. L.) § 4708; the AntiArson Act of 1982, 18 U.S.C. 841 note;
the William Wilberforce Trafficking
Victims Protection Reauthorization Act
of 2008, 34 U.S.C. 41309; the USA
Patriot Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005, Public Law
109–177, 307, subsection (e) Reporting
of Cargo Theft, 120 Statutes at Large
193, 240 (2006); and 34 U.S.C. 12532,
this collection requests incident data
from federal, state, local, and tribal
LEAs in order for the FBI Uniform
Crime Reporting (UCR) Program to serve
as the national clearinghouse for the
collection and dissemination of incident
data and to release these statistics in the
following publications: Crime in the
United States, Hate Crime Statistics,
Law Enforcement Officers Killed and
Assaulted, and National Incident-Based
Reporting System. NIBRS is a data
collection which allows LEAs to collect
information on each crime occurrence.
The FBI designed NIBRS to generate
data as a byproduct of federal, state, and
local automated records management
systems (RMS). NIBRS collects data on
each incident and arrest within 28 crime
categories comprised of 71 specific
crimes called Group A offenses. For
each of the offenses coming to the
attention of law enforcement, various
details about the crime are collected. In
addition to the Group A offenses, arrest
data only are reported for 13 Group B
offense categories. When reporting data
via the traditional Summary Reporting
System (SRS), LEAs tally the
occurrences of 10 Part I crimes.
The most significant difference
between NIBRS and the traditional SRS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Jan 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
is the degree of detail in reporting.
NIBRS is capable of producing more
detailed, accurate, and meaningful
information because data are collected
about when and where crime takes
place, what form it takes, and the
characteristics of its victims and
perpetrators. Although most of the
general concepts for collecting, scoring,
and reporting the UCR data in the SRS
apply in NIBRS (e.g., jurisdictional
rules), there are some important
differences between the two data
collection systems. The SRS employs
the Hierarchy Rule, i.e., in a multipleoffense incident, only the most serious
offense is reported, and only 10 Part I
offenses can be reported. The many
advantages NIBRS has over the SRS
include, but are not limited to, reports
up to 10 offenses occurring during the
incident; revised, expanded, and new
offense definitions; more specificity in
reporting and using offense and arrest
data for 28 Group A offense categories
encompassing 71 crimes; distinguishes
between attempted and completed
Group A crimes; provides crimes against
society; includes victim-to-offender
data, circumstance, drug-related
offenses, offenders suspected use of
drugs, and expanded computer crime;
and provides updated reports tied
directly to the original incident. The
Group A offense categories include
animal cruelty; arson; assault offenses;
bribery; burglary/breaking and entering;
commerce violations; * counterfeiting/
forgery; destruction/damage/vandalism
of property; drug/narcotic offenses;
embezzlement; espionage; * extortion/
blackmail; fraud offenses; fugitive
offenses; * gambling offenses; homicide
offenses; human trafficking;
immigration violations; * kidnapping/
abduction; larceny/theft offenses; motor
vehicle theft; pornography/obscene
material; prostitution offenses; robbery;
sex offenses; stolen property offenses;
treason; * and weapon law violations.
The 13 Group B offense categories, for
which only arrest data are collected,
include bad checks; bond default; *
curfew/loitering/vagrancy violations;
disorderly conduct; driving under the
influence; drunkenness; family offenses,
nonviolent; federal resource violation; *
liquor law violations; peeping tom;
perjury; * trespass of real property; and
all other offenses. (Offense categories
followed by an asterisk (*) denote those
reported by federal and tribal LEAs
only.) In 2019, NIBRS began collecting
additional data values to capture
information on domestic violence, cargo
theft, and negligent manslaughter.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
255
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: The number of LEAs
submitting data to the FBI UCR Program
via NIBRS as of September 7, 2021 is
10,284. The FBI designed NIBRS to
generate data as a byproduct of federal,
state, and local automated RMS. Many
LEAs have RMS capable of producing a
myriad of statistics to meet their
particular needs. LEAs forward only the
data required by NIBRS to participate in
the FBI UCR Program. Each month, it
takes approximately two hours for an
average respondent to respond, which is
an annual burden of 24 hours. Two
hours is the time required for a law
enforcement agency’s RMS to download
NIBRS data and send the information to
the state UCR program (if applicable).
The state UCR program then forwards
the data to the FBI.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated annual public
burden associated with the NIBRS data
collection is 237,000 hours (9,875 LEAs
× 24 hours annually = 237,000 total
annual hours).
If additional information is required,
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: December 29, 2021.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for the PRA,
U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2021–28493 Filed 1–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Corrected Notice of Lodging of
Proposed Consent Decree Under the
Oil Pollution and Clean Water Acts
On December 22, 2021, the United
States’ Department of Justice lodged a
proposed Consent Decree with the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of
Louisiana in United States v. Taylor
Energy Company LLC, Civil Case No.
20–2910 (E.D. La.). A previously
published version of this notice
incorrectly stated that the Consent
Decree was lodged on December 20,
2021.
The Complaint in this civil action,
filed on October 23, 2020, seeks removal
costs, civil penalties, and natural
resource damages (NRD) under Section
1002 and 1004 of the Oil Pollution Act
(OPA), 33 U.S.C. 2702 and 2704, and
Section 311 of the Clean Water Act, 33
U.S.C. 1321. These claims arise from the
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
256
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2022 / Notices
discharge of oil from Taylor Energy
Company LLC’s (Taylor Energy’s)
former oil production facility on the
Outer Continental Shelf in the Gulf of
Mexico, which began when the facility
was damaged during a hurricane in
September 2004.
Under the proposed Consent Decree,
Taylor Energy will pay approximately
$43.5 million—all of the company’s
available remaining assets—allocated as
$15 million to a civil penalty, $16.5
million to NRD, and over $12 million to
the U.S. Coast Guard removal costs, to
resolve the civil claims arising from the
oil discharge. The State of Louisiana is
a co-trustee for natural resources injured
by the spill, and the NRD money is a
joint recovery to be used for natural
resource restoration projects selected by
the federal and State trustees. Taylor
Energy will also transfer to the U.S.
Department of the Interior (DOI)’s
Bureau of Ocean and Energy
Management (BOEM) over $432 million
currently held in a trust for plugging the
seafloor oil wells and otherwise
decommissioning the facility, and the
company will be barred from interfering
in any way with the Bureau of Safety
and Environmental Enforcement’s
(BSEE’s) decommissioning work.
Likewise, Taylor Energy commits not to
interfere with the Coast Guard’s oil
containment and removal actions and
agrees to turn over to DOI and the Coast
Guard documents (including data,
studies, reports, etc.) relating to the site
to assist in the decommissioning and
response efforts. Upon liquidation,
Taylor Energy will transfer the value of
its remaining assets to the U.S. as its
final payment.
In addition, the proposed Consent
Decree requires the company to dismiss
with prejudice its numerous lawsuits
against the U.S., including challenges to
the Coast Guard’s decision to install a
spill containment system and an appeal
of the Coast Guard’s denial of Taylor
Energy’s $353 million spill-cost
reimbursement claim submitted to the
U.S. Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.
The United States Department of
Justice filed the proposed Consent
Decree on behalf of the Coast Guard,
DOI, and the federal and State trustees
for natural resources. The designated
federal trustees for the natural resources
impacted by Taylor Energy’s oil spill are
the U.S. Department of Commerce
through the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
and DOI through the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service. The designated State
trustees are the Louisiana Oil Spill
Coordinator’s Office, Department of
Public Safety & Corrections; Louisiana
Department of Natural Resources;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Jan 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality; Louisiana Department of
Wildlife and Fisheries; and the
Louisiana Coastal Protection and
Restoration Authority.
The publication of this corrected
notice opens a 40-day period for public
comment on the proposed Consent
Decree. Comments should be addressed
to the Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and should refer to United
States v. Taylor Energy Company LLC,
DJ# 90–5–1–1–11008/2, Civil Case No.
20–2910 (E.D. La.). All comments must
be submitted no later than 40 days after
the publication date of this corrected
notice. Comments may be submitted
either by email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
Thomas Carroll,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2021–28497 Filed 1–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
Frm 00042
[NRC–2021–0221]
Applications and Amendments to
Facility Operating Licenses and
Combined Licenses Involving
Proposed No Significant Hazards
Considerations and Containing
Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information and Order Imposing
Procedures for Access to Sensitive
Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License amendment request;
notice of opportunity to comment,
request a hearing, and petition for leave
to intervene; order imposing
procedures.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) received and is
considering approval of three
amendment requests. The amendment
requests are for Three Mile Island, Unit
2, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,
Units 1 and 2, and Prairie Island
Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2.
For each amendment request, the NRC
proposes to determine that the request
involves no significant hazards
consideration (NSHC). Because each
amendment request contains sensitive
unclassified non-safeguards information
(SUNSI), an order imposes procedures
to obtain access to SUNSI for contention
preparation by persons who file a
hearing request or petition for leave to
intervene.
DATES: Comments must be filed by
February 3, 2022. A request for a
hearing or petitions for leave to
intervene must be filed by March 7,
2022. Any potential party as defined in
section 2.4 of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) who
believes access to SUNSI is necessary to
respond to this notice must request
document access by January 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods
however, the NRC encourages electronic
comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website:
• Federal rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2021–0221. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• Mail comments to: Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
SUMMARY:
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
proposed Consent Decree upon written
request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and
enclose a check or money order for
$14.50 (25 cents per page reproduction
cost) payable to the United States
Treasury to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
PO 00000
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 255-256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28497]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Corrected Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the
Oil Pollution and Clean Water Acts
On December 22, 2021, the United States' Department of Justice
lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana in United States v. Taylor Energy Company
LLC, Civil Case No. 20-2910 (E.D. La.). A previously published version
of this notice incorrectly stated that the Consent Decree was lodged on
December 20, 2021.
The Complaint in this civil action, filed on October 23, 2020,
seeks removal costs, civil penalties, and natural resource damages
(NRD) under Section 1002 and 1004 of the Oil Pollution Act (OPA), 33
U.S.C. 2702 and 2704, and Section 311 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
1321. These claims arise from the
[[Page 256]]
discharge of oil from Taylor Energy Company LLC's (Taylor Energy's)
former oil production facility on the Outer Continental Shelf in the
Gulf of Mexico, which began when the facility was damaged during a
hurricane in September 2004.
Under the proposed Consent Decree, Taylor Energy will pay
approximately $43.5 million--all of the company's available remaining
assets--allocated as $15 million to a civil penalty, $16.5 million to
NRD, and over $12 million to the U.S. Coast Guard removal costs, to
resolve the civil claims arising from the oil discharge. The State of
Louisiana is a co-trustee for natural resources injured by the spill,
and the NRD money is a joint recovery to be used for natural resource
restoration projects selected by the federal and State trustees. Taylor
Energy will also transfer to the U.S. Department of the Interior
(DOI)'s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM) over $432 million
currently held in a trust for plugging the seafloor oil wells and
otherwise decommissioning the facility, and the company will be barred
from interfering in any way with the Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement's (BSEE's) decommissioning work. Likewise, Taylor Energy
commits not to interfere with the Coast Guard's oil containment and
removal actions and agrees to turn over to DOI and the Coast Guard
documents (including data, studies, reports, etc.) relating to the site
to assist in the decommissioning and response efforts. Upon
liquidation, Taylor Energy will transfer the value of its remaining
assets to the U.S. as its final payment.
In addition, the proposed Consent Decree requires the company to
dismiss with prejudice its numerous lawsuits against the U.S.,
including challenges to the Coast Guard's decision to install a spill
containment system and an appeal of the Coast Guard's denial of Taylor
Energy's $353 million spill-cost reimbursement claim submitted to the
U.S. Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.
The United States Department of Justice filed the proposed Consent
Decree on behalf of the Coast Guard, DOI, and the federal and State
trustees for natural resources. The designated federal trustees for the
natural resources impacted by Taylor Energy's oil spill are the U.S.
Department of Commerce through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) and DOI through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service. The designated State trustees are the Louisiana Oil Spill
Coordinator's Office, Department of Public Safety & Corrections;
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources; Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality; Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries;
and the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority.
The publication of this corrected notice opens a 40-day period for
public comment on the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. Taylor Energy
Company LLC, DJ# 90-5-1-1-11008/2, Civil Case No. 20-2910 (E.D. La.).
All comments must be submitted no later than 40 days after the
publication date of this corrected notice. Comments may be submitted
either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................ [email protected].
By mail............................. Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may
be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of
the proposed Consent Decree upon written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your request and enclose a check or
money order for $14.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to
the United States Treasury to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ--ENRD,
P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Thomas Carroll,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-28497 Filed 1-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P