Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Revisions to Annual Reporting and Certification Requirements for Inmate Calling Services (ICS) Providers, 212-214 [2021-28494]
Download as PDF
212
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(d) If a court or other competent
authority orders that an NEH employee
comply with a demand notwithstanding
a final decision by the General Counsel
to the contrary, or at any other stage in
the process, the General Counsel shall
advise the employee on how to respond
to such order and may arrange for legal
representation of the employee.
§ 1167.6 Office of Inspector General
employees.
Notwithstanding the requirements set
forth in §§ 1167.1 through 1167.5, when
an employee of the agency’s Office of
the Inspector General receives a demand
or request to provide testimony or
produce official records and
information, the Inspector General or
his or her designee shall be responsible
for performing the functions assigned to
the General Counsel under this part
with respect to such demand or request.
Dated: December 28, 2021.
Samuel Roth,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for
the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2021–28468 Filed 1–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[WC Docket No. 12–375, DA 21–1583; FR
ID 64286]
Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks
Comment on Revisions to Annual
Reporting and Certification
Requirements for Inmate Calling
Services (ICS) Providers
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Solicitation of comments.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB or
the Bureau) of the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
the Commission) seeks comment on
proposed revisions to the instructions
and templates for the Annual Reports
and Annual Certifications submitted by
providers of inmate calling services.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
January 12, 2022; and reply comments
are due on or before January 27. 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WC Docket No. 12–375, by
any of the following methods:
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSED RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jan 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing.
• Filings can be sent by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
• Effective March 19, 2020, and until
further notice, the Commission no
longer accepts any hand or messenger
delivered filings. This is a temporary
measure taken to help protect the health
and safety of individuals, and to
mitigate the transmission of COVID–19.
See FCC Announces Closure of FCC
Headquarters Open Window and
Change in Hand-Delivery Policy, Public
Notice, DA 20–304 (March 19, 2020).
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcccloses-headquarters-open-window-andchanges-hand-delivery-policy.
People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Minsoo Kim, Pricing Policy Division,
Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202)
418–1739 or via email at Minsoo.Kim@
fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s
document, Public Notice, DA 21–1583,
released December 15, 2022. The full
text of this document is available at
https://www.fcc.gov/document/wcbseeks-comment-ics-annual-reportingand-certification-revisions.
Synopsis
By this document, the Wireline
Competition Bureau (WCB or the
Bureau) seeks comment on proposed
revisions to the instructions and
templates for the Annual Reports and
Annual Certifications submitted by
providers of inmate calling services
(ICS). The Commission requires ICS
providers to make these filings to enable
the Commission to monitor and track
trends in the ICS marketplace, increase
provider transparency, and ensure
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
compliance with the Commission’s ICS
rules.
Pursuant to delegated authority, the
Bureau created standardized reporting
templates (FCC Form 2301(a)) for the
Annual Report and a related
certification of accuracy (FCC Form
2301(b)), as well as instructions to guide
providers through the reporting process.
The Bureau amended the instructions
and template for the Annual Report in
2020 in order to improve the type and
quality of the information collected.
In the 2021 ICS Order, the
Commission revised its ICS rules by
adopting, inter alia, lower interim rate
caps for interstate ICS calls, new interim
rate caps for international ICS calls, and
a rate cap structure that requires ICS
providers to differentiate between
legally mandated and contractually
required site commissions. The new
2021 rules necessitate further changes to
the annual reporting and certification
templates for which WCB seeks
comment herein. Pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), WCB will publish a notice in the
Federal Register seeking comment on
the information collection requirements
for the annual reporting and
certification requirements in the Public
Notice.
I. Overall Structure of the Annual
Reporting and Certification
Requirements
Pursuant to delegated authority, WCB
proposes to revise the instructions and
templates for the Annual Reports and
Certifications to be consistent with the
Commission’s rules. These revised
instructions and the associated
templates, if adopted, will consolidate
and supplant the instructions and
templates for earlier iterations of the ICS
annual reporting and certification
requirements. WCB also proposes
improvements based on experience
reviewing prior Annual Reports, which
has persuaded us that revised
instructions would help providers better
understand the requirements, making
the submitted reports more useful to the
Commission and consumers. To that
end, WCB proposes to adopt both an
Excel-format template and a Wordformat template for the Annual Reports
to better separate individual data items
from narrative responses. For simplicity,
WCB refers to these respective portions
of the template as the Word template
and the Excel template. WCB seeks
comment on these proposed revisions,
generally, and on the specific structure,
content, and format of the proposed
templates and instructions attached
hereto. WCB likewise proposes minor
revisions to the certification form. Are
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSED RULES
there other changes or additions WCB
should make to gather better or more
accurate data or to make the instructions
more clear? Is there additional
information or data that WCB should
require providers to submit to enable
the Commission to better monitor
compliance and industry trends, or
increase transparency to the public?
Conversely, are there any proposed
instructions, inquiries, or data fields
that should be removed because they are
unnecessary to ensure that providers
report uniform and accurate data and
other information or they would reduce
the burdens on providers in submitting
this data?
A. Proposed Instructions for Annual
Reports
WCB seeks comment on whether the
proposed instructions provide sufficient
guidance to ensure that providers use
uniform methodologies and report the
required information in a consistent
manner. Are there any additional
changes that would clarify the
instructions, including the definitions,
to help increase uniformity across
providers’ responses? WCB seeks
comment on all aspects of the proposed
instructions, including any proposed
revisions not explicitly addressed in the
Public Notice.
Reporting Period. As has been the
case with prior annual reports, the
reporting period is the year immediately
preceding the year during which the
annual report is due. Thus, the reporting
period for the next annual reports due
April 1, 2022 will be January 1, 2021
through December 31, 2021. The
Commission’s new interim interstate
and international ICS rate caps adopted
in the 2021 ICS Order became effective
on October 26, 2021. In various places,
the proposed instructions explain how
providers may report less detailed
information for the period between
January 1, 2021 and October 25, 2021
than for the period between October 26,
2021 and December 31, 2021 and going
forward.
General Categories of Information
Requested. The proposed instructions,
like for prior reports, require providers
to submit certain types of information
related to their operations, ICS rates,
ancillary service charges, site
commissions, and disability access. Do
the proposed instructions describe these
categories of data in sufficient detail? Is
there additional information or data that
WCB should require providers to submit
in any of these categories to enable the
Commission to better monitor
compliance and industry trends, or
increase transparency to the public? Are
there any changes WCB should make to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jan 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
the proposed instructions and templates
to make them easier for providers to
understand?
B. Specific Data and Information
Inquiries
Inmate Calling Service Rates. The
proposed instructions require providers
to submit intrastate, interstate, and
international ICS rates across three
general categories: (i) Highest rates
charged, (ii) average rates charged, and
(iii) year-end rates charged at a
particular facility. Specifically, WCB
proposes to require the reporting of the
highest 15-minute rate, highest year-end
15-minute rate, and average per-minute
rate. WCB’s current instructions require
providers to report every single rate
charged over the reporting period. WCB
believes the proposed categories will
significantly reduce the burdens on
providers, particularly those that
frequently change their rates. Further,
because certain providers may charge
one rate for the initial minute of a call
and another for each successive minute,
obtaining information for 15-minute
calls (a duration that the Commission
has previously treated as the length of
a typical call) will help the Commission
compare rates among providers without
imposing unwarranted burdens on
them. With regard to the highest 15minute rate, WCB proposes to require
providers to break down those rates into
the first-minute rate and the rate for
additional minutes, and to further report
the site commission amounts included
in those rates. For interstate and
international rates, WCB adds a fourth
category, that would require providers
to identify all rates charged in excess of
the applicable rate caps. For
international rates, WCB further
proposes to require providers to report
terminating charges they paid to their
underlying international service
provider to each destination. Are the
proposed instructions for reporting
average international termination
charges clear? WCB also proposes to
seek certain narrative information about
the reported rates, including
explanations for rates that exceed the
Commission’s rate caps.
WCB seeks comment on this rate
reporting approach. Will seeking rate
information in these categories provide
the Commission adequate rate
information to ensure compliance with
the Commission’s rules? Are there other
changes WCB can make to the proposed
rate reporting structure to make it easier
for providers to respond, without
sacrificing any necessary information or
transparency? That structure is a
departure from the previous
requirement that a provider must submit
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
213
every rate charged over the reporting
period, a step that should significantly
reduce burdens on providers that
frequently adjust their rates. WCB
believes that requiring providers to
identify and submit information on all
interstate and international rates that
exceed the applicable caps will not
impose an unwarranted burden, as WCB
expects such violations to be infrequent.
WCB believes the proposed rate
reporting structure properly balances
the need for accurate information on ICS
rates with the need to avoid imposing
unwarranted burdens on providers.
WCB invites comment on this
assessment.
Ancillary Service Charges. The
proposed instructions continue to
require providers to report a variety of
information about any ancillary services
charges they have assessed. WCB
proposes to require a narrative
explanation concerning any allocation
methodology among facilities in a single
contract, where applicable. Is there any
additional information WCB should
seek that would improve the quantity or
quality of ancillary charge information
providers are required to submit?
Site Commissions. The proposed
instructions seek information
concerning site commissions on a more
disaggregated basis than WCB has
previously required. WCB proposes to
require providers to report their average
total monthly site commission payments
on a facility-by-facility basis and to
separate those payments between legally
mandated and contractually prescribed
site commission payments, consistent
with the Commission’s rules. WCB also
proposes to require providers to
subdivide both types of payments
between monetary and in-kind
payments and, within those
subdivisions, to report the portions of
the payments that were either fixed or
variable. How should providers report
the value of in-kind site commission
payments? Should WCB, for example,
require providers to identify the type
and quantity of in-kind payment (such
as free or reduced-price equipment) and
then assign a dollar value to that
payment? Should WCB instruct
providers on how to determine the
dollar value of an in-kind payment and,
if so, what instructions should WCB
adopt?
Disability Access and Related
Considerations. The proposed
instructions continue to require
providers to report a variety of
information about the provision of ICS
to incarcerated people with hearing and
speech disabilities, including any
Ancillary Service Charges that providers
have assessed for or in connection with
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
214
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules
TTY-based calls. WCB proposes to also
require a narrative explanation
concerning any allocation methodology
used in connection with this
information, where applicable, and
WCB seeks comment on this approach.
Miscellaneous. The proposed
instructions contain a variety of
questions seeking basic provider
information, as well as questions
seeking narrative information about
provider operations and facilities. Is
there additional information the
Commission should seek that would
help increase transparency and
compliance without imposing
unwarranted burdens on providers?
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSED RULES
II. Procedural Matters
Filing of Comments and Replies.
Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System. See
FCC, Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121
(May 1, 1998).
Comments and reply comments must
include a short and concise summary of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jan 03, 2022
Jkt 256001
the substantive arguments raised in the
pleading. Comments and reply
comments must also comply with
section 1.49 and all other applicable
sections of the Commission’s rules.
WCB directs all interested parties to
include the name of the filing party and
the date of the filing on each page of
their comments and reply comments.
All parties are encouraged to use a table
of contents, regardless of the length of
their submission. WCB also strongly
encourages parties to track the
organization set forth in the Public
Notice and the instructions in order to
facilitate the internal review process.
Ex Parte Presentations. This
proceeding shall be treated as a ‘‘permitbut-disclose’’ proceeding in accordance
with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Persons making ex parte presentations
must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda, or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in the prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with § 1.1206(b)
of the Commission’s rules. Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Pamela Arluk,
Chief, Competition Policy Division, Wireline
Competition Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2021–28494 Filed 1–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 212-214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28494]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[WC Docket No. 12-375, DA 21-1583; FR ID 64286]
Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Revisions to Annual
Reporting and Certification Requirements for Inmate Calling Services
(ICS) Providers
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Solicitation of comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB or the
Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the
Commission) seeks comment on proposed revisions to the instructions and
templates for the Annual Reports and Annual Certifications submitted by
providers of inmate calling services.
DATES: Comments are due on or before January 12, 2022; and reply
comments are due on or before January 27. 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by WC Docket No. 12-375,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing.
Filings can be sent by commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive,
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.
Effective March 19, 2020, and until further notice, the
Commission no longer accepts any hand or messenger delivered filings.
This is a temporary measure taken to help protect the health and safety
of individuals, and to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19. See FCC
Announces Closure of FCC Headquarters Open Window and Change in Hand-
Delivery Policy, Public Notice, DA 20-304 (March 19, 2020). https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-closes-headquarters-open-window-and-changes-hand-delivery-policy.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-
418-0432 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Minsoo Kim, Pricing Policy Division,
Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1739 or via email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's
document, Public Notice, DA 21-1583, released December 15, 2022. The
full text of this document is available at https://www.fcc.gov/document/wcb-seeks-comment-ics-annual-reporting-and-certification-revisions.
Synopsis
By this document, the Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB or the
Bureau) seeks comment on proposed revisions to the instructions and
templates for the Annual Reports and Annual Certifications submitted by
providers of inmate calling services (ICS). The Commission requires ICS
providers to make these filings to enable the Commission to monitor and
track trends in the ICS marketplace, increase provider transparency,
and ensure compliance with the Commission's ICS rules.
Pursuant to delegated authority, the Bureau created standardized
reporting templates (FCC Form 2301(a)) for the Annual Report and a
related certification of accuracy (FCC Form 2301(b)), as well as
instructions to guide providers through the reporting process. The
Bureau amended the instructions and template for the Annual Report in
2020 in order to improve the type and quality of the information
collected.
In the 2021 ICS Order, the Commission revised its ICS rules by
adopting, inter alia, lower interim rate caps for interstate ICS calls,
new interim rate caps for international ICS calls, and a rate cap
structure that requires ICS providers to differentiate between legally
mandated and contractually required site commissions. The new 2021
rules necessitate further changes to the annual reporting and
certification templates for which WCB seeks comment herein. Pursuant to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), WCB will publish a notice in
the Federal Register seeking comment on the information collection
requirements for the annual reporting and certification requirements in
the Public Notice.
I. Overall Structure of the Annual Reporting and Certification
Requirements
Pursuant to delegated authority, WCB proposes to revise the
instructions and templates for the Annual Reports and Certifications to
be consistent with the Commission's rules. These revised instructions
and the associated templates, if adopted, will consolidate and supplant
the instructions and templates for earlier iterations of the ICS annual
reporting and certification requirements. WCB also proposes
improvements based on experience reviewing prior Annual Reports, which
has persuaded us that revised instructions would help providers better
understand the requirements, making the submitted reports more useful
to the Commission and consumers. To that end, WCB proposes to adopt
both an Excel-format template and a Word-format template for the Annual
Reports to better separate individual data items from narrative
responses. For simplicity, WCB refers to these respective portions of
the template as the Word template and the Excel template. WCB seeks
comment on these proposed revisions, generally, and on the specific
structure, content, and format of the proposed templates and
instructions attached hereto. WCB likewise proposes minor revisions to
the certification form. Are
[[Page 213]]
there other changes or additions WCB should make to gather better or
more accurate data or to make the instructions more clear? Is there
additional information or data that WCB should require providers to
submit to enable the Commission to better monitor compliance and
industry trends, or increase transparency to the public? Conversely,
are there any proposed instructions, inquiries, or data fields that
should be removed because they are unnecessary to ensure that providers
report uniform and accurate data and other information or they would
reduce the burdens on providers in submitting this data?
A. Proposed Instructions for Annual Reports
WCB seeks comment on whether the proposed instructions provide
sufficient guidance to ensure that providers use uniform methodologies
and report the required information in a consistent manner. Are there
any additional changes that would clarify the instructions, including
the definitions, to help increase uniformity across providers'
responses? WCB seeks comment on all aspects of the proposed
instructions, including any proposed revisions not explicitly addressed
in the Public Notice.
Reporting Period. As has been the case with prior annual reports,
the reporting period is the year immediately preceding the year during
which the annual report is due. Thus, the reporting period for the next
annual reports due April 1, 2022 will be January 1, 2021 through
December 31, 2021. The Commission's new interim interstate and
international ICS rate caps adopted in the 2021 ICS Order became
effective on October 26, 2021. In various places, the proposed
instructions explain how providers may report less detailed information
for the period between January 1, 2021 and October 25, 2021 than for
the period between October 26, 2021 and December 31, 2021 and going
forward.
General Categories of Information Requested. The proposed
instructions, like for prior reports, require providers to submit
certain types of information related to their operations, ICS rates,
ancillary service charges, site commissions, and disability access. Do
the proposed instructions describe these categories of data in
sufficient detail? Is there additional information or data that WCB
should require providers to submit in any of these categories to enable
the Commission to better monitor compliance and industry trends, or
increase transparency to the public? Are there any changes WCB should
make to the proposed instructions and templates to make them easier for
providers to understand?
B. Specific Data and Information Inquiries
Inmate Calling Service Rates. The proposed instructions require
providers to submit intrastate, interstate, and international ICS rates
across three general categories: (i) Highest rates charged, (ii)
average rates charged, and (iii) year-end rates charged at a particular
facility. Specifically, WCB proposes to require the reporting of the
highest 15-minute rate, highest year-end 15-minute rate, and average
per-minute rate. WCB's current instructions require providers to report
every single rate charged over the reporting period. WCB believes the
proposed categories will significantly reduce the burdens on providers,
particularly those that frequently change their rates. Further, because
certain providers may charge one rate for the initial minute of a call
and another for each successive minute, obtaining information for 15-
minute calls (a duration that the Commission has previously treated as
the length of a typical call) will help the Commission compare rates
among providers without imposing unwarranted burdens on them. With
regard to the highest 15-minute rate, WCB proposes to require providers
to break down those rates into the first-minute rate and the rate for
additional minutes, and to further report the site commission amounts
included in those rates. For interstate and international rates, WCB
adds a fourth category, that would require providers to identify all
rates charged in excess of the applicable rate caps. For international
rates, WCB further proposes to require providers to report terminating
charges they paid to their underlying international service provider to
each destination. Are the proposed instructions for reporting average
international termination charges clear? WCB also proposes to seek
certain narrative information about the reported rates, including
explanations for rates that exceed the Commission's rate caps.
WCB seeks comment on this rate reporting approach. Will seeking
rate information in these categories provide the Commission adequate
rate information to ensure compliance with the Commission's rules? Are
there other changes WCB can make to the proposed rate reporting
structure to make it easier for providers to respond, without
sacrificing any necessary information or transparency? That structure
is a departure from the previous requirement that a provider must
submit every rate charged over the reporting period, a step that should
significantly reduce burdens on providers that frequently adjust their
rates. WCB believes that requiring providers to identify and submit
information on all interstate and international rates that exceed the
applicable caps will not impose an unwarranted burden, as WCB expects
such violations to be infrequent. WCB believes the proposed rate
reporting structure properly balances the need for accurate information
on ICS rates with the need to avoid imposing unwarranted burdens on
providers. WCB invites comment on this assessment.
Ancillary Service Charges. The proposed instructions continue to
require providers to report a variety of information about any
ancillary services charges they have assessed. WCB proposes to require
a narrative explanation concerning any allocation methodology among
facilities in a single contract, where applicable. Is there any
additional information WCB should seek that would improve the quantity
or quality of ancillary charge information providers are required to
submit?
Site Commissions. The proposed instructions seek information
concerning site commissions on a more disaggregated basis than WCB has
previously required. WCB proposes to require providers to report their
average total monthly site commission payments on a facility-by-
facility basis and to separate those payments between legally mandated
and contractually prescribed site commission payments, consistent with
the Commission's rules. WCB also proposes to require providers to
subdivide both types of payments between monetary and in-kind payments
and, within those subdivisions, to report the portions of the payments
that were either fixed or variable. How should providers report the
value of in-kind site commission payments? Should WCB, for example,
require providers to identify the type and quantity of in-kind payment
(such as free or reduced-price equipment) and then assign a dollar
value to that payment? Should WCB instruct providers on how to
determine the dollar value of an in-kind payment and, if so, what
instructions should WCB adopt?
Disability Access and Related Considerations. The proposed
instructions continue to require providers to report a variety of
information about the provision of ICS to incarcerated people with
hearing and speech disabilities, including any Ancillary Service
Charges that providers have assessed for or in connection with
[[Page 214]]
TTY-based calls. WCB proposes to also require a narrative explanation
concerning any allocation methodology used in connection with this
information, where applicable, and WCB seeks comment on this approach.
Miscellaneous. The proposed instructions contain a variety of
questions seeking basic provider information, as well as questions
seeking narrative information about provider operations and facilities.
Is there additional information the Commission should seek that would
help increase transparency and compliance without imposing unwarranted
burdens on providers?
II. Procedural Matters
Filing of Comments and Replies. Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and
1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested
parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates
indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed
using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System. See FCC,
Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121
(May 1, 1998).
Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise
summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments
and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other
applicable sections of the Commission's rules. WCB directs all
interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date
of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All
parties are encouraged to use a table of contents, regardless of the
length of their submission. WCB also strongly encourages parties to
track the organization set forth in the Public Notice and the
instructions in order to facilitate the internal review process.
Ex Parte Presentations. This proceeding shall be treated as a
``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's
ex parte rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy
of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral
presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a
different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda
summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons attending or
otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted
in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already
reflected in the presenter's written comments, memoranda, or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such
data or arguments in the prior comments, memoranda, or other filings
(specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data
or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex
parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must
be filed consistent with Sec. 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.
Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the
Commission's ex parte rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Pamela Arluk,
Chief, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2021-28494 Filed 1-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P