Testimony and Production of Records, 210-212 [2021-28468]

Download as PDF 210 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules proposal. You may not have another opportunity for comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this time. For additional information, please see the direct final rule published in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this issue of the Federal Register. Authority: This proposed action is issued under the authority of Sections 2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b). Deb Szaro, Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region I. [FR Doc. 2021–28332 Filed 1–3–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES National Endowment for the Humanities 45 CFR Part 1167 RIN 3136–AA44 Testimony and Production of Records National Endowment for the Humanities; National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities. ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments. AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is proposing to issue regulations to be followed when an NEH employee receives a demand or request to provide testimony or produce records in a legal proceeding. These procedures are designed to promote economy and efficiency in NEH’s programs and operations, to minimize the possibility of involving NEH in controversial issues not related to its functions, to maintain the impartiality of NEH among private litigants, and to protect sensitive, confidential information and the deliberative process. SUMMARY: Send comments on or before February 3, 2022. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by email to gencounsel@neh.gov. Instructions: Include ‘‘3136–AA44’’ in the subject line of the email. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, National Endowment for the Humanities, 400 7th Street SW, Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202) 606– 8322; gencounsel@neh.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSED RULES DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Jan 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 Background The Federal courts have upheld the authority of a Federal agency to establish procedures governing the production of records and testimony by personnel in legal proceedings in which the agency is not a party. United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). This proposed rule would establish policies and procedures that the agency will follow when, in a legal proceeding, a current or former NEH employee receives a demand or request to testify as to facts or events that relate to his or her official duties or the functions of NEH or to produce official records and information. This proposed rule relates to testimony and the production of records only in connection with legal proceedings to which the United States is not a party. It would not apply to requests under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a; Congressional demands or requests for testimony or records; or legal proceedings to which the United States is a party. Request for Comments NEH requests comments, which NEH must receive at the above address, by the above date. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is not a significant regulatory action and was therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review. Executive Order 13132, Federalism This rulemaking does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform This rulemaking meets the applicable standards set forth in section 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988. Specifically, this rulemaking is written in clear language designed to help reduce litigation. Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal Governments Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175, NEH evaluated this rulemaking and determined that it will not have any PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 potential effects on Federally recognized Indian Tribes. Executive Order 12630, Takings Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rulemaking does not have significant takings implications. Therefore, a takings implication assessment is not required. Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 This rulemaking will not have a significant adverse impact on a substantial number of small entities, including small businesses, small governmental jurisdictions, or certain small not-for-profit organizations. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This rulemaking does not impose an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This action contains no provisions constituting a collection of information pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This rulemaking does not contain a Federal mandate that will result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 This rulemaking will not have a significant effect on the human environment. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 This rulemaking will not be a major rule as defined in section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rulemaking will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, a major increase in costs or prices, significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets. E-Government Act of 2002 All information about NEH required to be published in the Federal Register may be accessed at www.neh.gov. The website www.regulations.gov contains electronic dockets for NEH’s rulemakings under the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946. Plain Writing Act of 2010 To ensure this proposed rule speaks in plain and clear language so that the E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM 04JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules public can use and understand it, NEH modeled the language of the proposed rule on the Federal Plain Language Guidelines. List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1167 Administrative practice and procedure. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the National Endowment for the Humanities proposes to amend 45 CFR chapter XI by adding part 1167 to read as follows: PART 1167—TESTIMONY AND PRODUCTION OF RECORDS Sec. 1167.1 Purpose. 1167.2 Applicability. 1167.3 Definitions. 1167.4 Testimony and production of official records and information. 1167.5 Procedure when demand is made. 1167.6 Office of Inspector General employees. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301. § 1167.1 Purpose. (a) This part sets forth policies and procedures to be followed when an employee of the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) receives a demand to provide testimony or produce official records and information in connection with a legal proceeding in which the United States is not a party. (b) The provisions of this part are intended to promote economy and efficiency in NEH’s programs and operations; minimize the possibility of involving NEH in controversial issues not related to its functions; maintain the impartiality of NEH among private litigants; and protect sensitive, confidential information and the agency’s internal deliberative process. (c) This part does not waive the sovereign immunity of the United States. (d) This part does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States. (e) This regulation is not intended to conflict with 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(13). tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSED RULES § 1167.2 Applicability. This part applies to demands and requests for factual or expert testimony or for official records or information in legal proceedings, except that it does not apply to: (a) Demands upon or requests for an NEH employee to testify as to facts or events that are in no way related to his or her official duties or to the functions of NEH; (b) Demands upon or requests for a former NEH employee to testify as to VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Jan 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 matters in which the former employee was not directly or materially involved while at NEH; (c) Requests for the release of records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a; (d) Congressional demands and requests for testimony or records; and (e) Legal proceedings to which the United States is a party. § 1167.3 Definitions. (a) Agency or NEH means the National Endowment for the Humanities. (b) Demand means a subpoena, order, or other demand of a court or other competent authority, issued in a legal proceeding, for the production of official records and information or for the testimony of an NEH employee. (c) General Counsel means the General Counsel of the agency, or any person to whom the General Counsel has delegated authority under this part. (d) Legal proceeding means any proceeding before a court of law, administrative board or commission, hearing officer, or other body conducting a legal or administrative proceeding. (e) NEH employee or employee means any present or former officer or employee of NEH; any other individual hired through contractual agreement by or on behalf of NEH, or who has performed or is performing services under such an agreement for NEH; and any individual who served or is serving on an NEH advisory committee. (f) Official records and information means all documents and material in the custody and control of NEH; relating to information in the custody and control of NEH; or acquired by an NEH employee in the performance of his or her official duties or because of his or her official status, while the individual was employed by or on behalf of the NEH. (g) Request means any request in connection with an ongoing or threatened legal proceeding, by whatever method, for the production of official records and information or for testimony, other than a demand. (h) Testimony means any written or oral statement by a witness, and includes depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations, and statements at a hearing or trial. § 1167.4 Testimony and production of official records and information. (a) No employee may produce official records and information or provide any testimony in response to a demand or request unless authorized to do so by the General Counsel in accordance with this part. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 211 (b) The General Counsel, in his or her discretion, may grant an employee permission to testify or produce official records and information in response to a demand or request. In making this decision, the General Counsel shall consider whether: (1) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be consistent with the purposes of this part; (2) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice; (3) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be in the best interest of NEH and the United States; or (4) NEH has an interest in the outcome of the legal proceeding. (c) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge or produce official records and information, but, unless specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, shall not: (1) Disclose confidential or privileged information; (2) Testify as to matters regarding which the General Counsel determines that testimony would not be in the best interest of NEH or the United States; (3) Produce official records and information regarding which the General Counsel determines that production would not be in the best interest of NEH or the United States; or (4) Testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee’s official duties or the functions of NEH. (See also 5 CFR 2635.805.) § 1167.5 Procedure when demand is made. (a) Whenever an employee is served with a demand to testify in his or her official capacity, or to produce official records and information, the employee shall notify the General Counsel immediately. (b) The General Counsel shall review the demand and, in accordance with the provisions of § 1167.4, shall determine whether, or on what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify and/or produce official records and information. (c) If a demand requires a response before the General Counsel has made the determination referred to in paragraph (b) of this section, the General Counsel shall provide the court or other competent authority with a copy of this part, inform the court or other competent authority that the demand is being reviewed, and seek a stay of the demand pending a final determination. E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM 04JAP1 212 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2022 / Proposed Rules (d) If a court or other competent authority orders that an NEH employee comply with a demand notwithstanding a final decision by the General Counsel to the contrary, or at any other stage in the process, the General Counsel shall advise the employee on how to respond to such order and may arrange for legal representation of the employee. § 1167.6 Office of Inspector General employees. Notwithstanding the requirements set forth in §§ 1167.1 through 1167.5, when an employee of the agency’s Office of the Inspector General receives a demand or request to provide testimony or produce official records and information, the Inspector General or his or her designee shall be responsible for performing the functions assigned to the General Counsel under this part with respect to such demand or request. Dated: December 28, 2021. Samuel Roth, Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for the Humanities. [FR Doc. 2021–28468 Filed 1–3–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7536–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 64 [WC Docket No. 12–375, DA 21–1583; FR ID 64286] Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Revisions to Annual Reporting and Certification Requirements for Inmate Calling Services (ICS) Providers Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Solicitation of comments. AGENCY: In this document, the Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB or the Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) seeks comment on proposed revisions to the instructions and templates for the Annual Reports and Annual Certifications submitted by providers of inmate calling services. DATES: Comments are due on or before January 12, 2022; and reply comments are due on or before January 27. 2022. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by WC Docket No. 12–375, by any of the following methods: • Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https:// apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSED RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Jan 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 • Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and one copy of each filing. • Filings can be sent by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. • Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701. • U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. • Effective March 19, 2020, and until further notice, the Commission no longer accepts any hand or messenger delivered filings. This is a temporary measure taken to help protect the health and safety of individuals, and to mitigate the transmission of COVID–19. See FCC Announces Closure of FCC Headquarters Open Window and Change in Hand-Delivery Policy, Public Notice, DA 20–304 (March 19, 2020). https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcccloses-headquarters-open-window-andchanges-hand-delivery-policy. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202– 418–0432 (TTY). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Minsoo Kim, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418–1739 or via email at Minsoo.Kim@ fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s document, Public Notice, DA 21–1583, released December 15, 2022. The full text of this document is available at https://www.fcc.gov/document/wcbseeks-comment-ics-annual-reportingand-certification-revisions. Synopsis By this document, the Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB or the Bureau) seeks comment on proposed revisions to the instructions and templates for the Annual Reports and Annual Certifications submitted by providers of inmate calling services (ICS). The Commission requires ICS providers to make these filings to enable the Commission to monitor and track trends in the ICS marketplace, increase provider transparency, and ensure PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 compliance with the Commission’s ICS rules. Pursuant to delegated authority, the Bureau created standardized reporting templates (FCC Form 2301(a)) for the Annual Report and a related certification of accuracy (FCC Form 2301(b)), as well as instructions to guide providers through the reporting process. The Bureau amended the instructions and template for the Annual Report in 2020 in order to improve the type and quality of the information collected. In the 2021 ICS Order, the Commission revised its ICS rules by adopting, inter alia, lower interim rate caps for interstate ICS calls, new interim rate caps for international ICS calls, and a rate cap structure that requires ICS providers to differentiate between legally mandated and contractually required site commissions. The new 2021 rules necessitate further changes to the annual reporting and certification templates for which WCB seeks comment herein. Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), WCB will publish a notice in the Federal Register seeking comment on the information collection requirements for the annual reporting and certification requirements in the Public Notice. I. Overall Structure of the Annual Reporting and Certification Requirements Pursuant to delegated authority, WCB proposes to revise the instructions and templates for the Annual Reports and Certifications to be consistent with the Commission’s rules. These revised instructions and the associated templates, if adopted, will consolidate and supplant the instructions and templates for earlier iterations of the ICS annual reporting and certification requirements. WCB also proposes improvements based on experience reviewing prior Annual Reports, which has persuaded us that revised instructions would help providers better understand the requirements, making the submitted reports more useful to the Commission and consumers. To that end, WCB proposes to adopt both an Excel-format template and a Wordformat template for the Annual Reports to better separate individual data items from narrative responses. For simplicity, WCB refers to these respective portions of the template as the Word template and the Excel template. WCB seeks comment on these proposed revisions, generally, and on the specific structure, content, and format of the proposed templates and instructions attached hereto. WCB likewise proposes minor revisions to the certification form. Are E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM 04JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 210-212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28468]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Humanities

45 CFR Part 1167

RIN 3136-AA44


Testimony and Production of Records

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities; National Foundation on 
the Arts and the Humanities.

ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is proposing 
to issue regulations to be followed when an NEH employee receives a 
demand or request to provide testimony or produce records in a legal 
proceeding. These procedures are designed to promote economy and 
efficiency in NEH's programs and operations, to minimize the 
possibility of involving NEH in controversial issues not related to its 
functions, to maintain the impartiality of NEH among private litigants, 
and to protect sensitive, confidential information and the deliberative 
process.

DATES: Send comments on or before February 3, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by email to [email protected].
    Instructions: Include ``3136-AA44'' in the subject line of the 
email.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General 
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, National Endowment for the 
Humanities, 400 7th Street SW, Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202) 
606-8322; [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Federal courts have upheld the authority of a Federal agency to 
establish procedures governing the production of records and testimony 
by personnel in legal proceedings in which the agency is not a party. 
United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). This 
proposed rule would establish policies and procedures that the agency 
will follow when, in a legal proceeding, a current or former NEH 
employee receives a demand or request to testify as to facts or events 
that relate to his or her official duties or the functions of NEH or to 
produce official records and information.
    This proposed rule relates to testimony and the production of 
records only in connection with legal proceedings to which the United 
States is not a party. It would not apply to requests under the Freedom 
of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 
552a; Congressional demands or requests for testimony or records; or 
legal proceedings to which the United States is a party.

Request for Comments

    NEH requests comments, which NEH must receive at the above address, 
by the above date.

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive 
Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was 
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for 
review.

Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    This rulemaking does not have federalism implications. It will not 
have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship 
between the national government and the states, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform

    This rulemaking meets the applicable standards set forth in section 
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988. Specifically, this 
rulemaking is written in clear language designed to help reduce 
litigation.

Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal Governments

    Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175, NEH evaluated this 
rulemaking and determined that it will not have any potential effects 
on Federally recognized Indian Tribes.

Executive Order 12630, Takings

    Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rulemaking does 
not have significant takings implications. Therefore, a takings 
implication assessment is not required.

Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980

    This rulemaking will not have a significant adverse impact on a 
substantial number of small entities, including small businesses, small 
governmental jurisdictions, or certain small not-for-profit 
organizations.

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This rulemaking does not impose an information collection burden 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This action contains no provisions 
constituting a collection of information pursuant to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This rulemaking does not contain a Federal mandate that will result 
in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the 
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one 
year.

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

    This rulemaking will not have a significant effect on the human 
environment.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

    This rulemaking will not be a major rule as defined in section 804 
of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This 
rulemaking will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 
million or more, a major increase in costs or prices, significant 
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, 
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete 
with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.

E-Government Act of 2002

    All information about NEH required to be published in the Federal 
Register may be accessed at www.neh.gov. The website 
www.regulations.gov contains electronic dockets for NEH's rulemakings 
under the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946.

Plain Writing Act of 2010

    To ensure this proposed rule speaks in plain and clear language so 
that the

[[Page 211]]

public can use and understand it, NEH modeled the language of the 
proposed rule on the Federal Plain Language Guidelines.

List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1167

    Administrative practice and procedure.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the National Endowment 
for the Humanities proposes to amend 45 CFR chapter XI by adding part 
1167 to read as follows:

PART 1167--TESTIMONY AND PRODUCTION OF RECORDS

Sec.
1167.1 Purpose.
1167.2 Applicability.
1167.3 Definitions.
1167.4 Testimony and production of official records and information.
1167.5 Procedure when demand is made.
1167.6 Office of Inspector General employees.

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301.


Sec.  1167.1  Purpose.

    (a) This part sets forth policies and procedures to be followed 
when an employee of the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) 
receives a demand to provide testimony or produce official records and 
information in connection with a legal proceeding in which the United 
States is not a party.
    (b) The provisions of this part are intended to promote economy and 
efficiency in NEH's programs and operations; minimize the possibility 
of involving NEH in controversial issues not related to its functions; 
maintain the impartiality of NEH among private litigants; and protect 
sensitive, confidential information and the agency's internal 
deliberative process.
    (c) This part does not waive the sovereign immunity of the United 
States.
    (d) This part does not create any right or benefit, substantive or 
procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States.
    (e) This regulation is not intended to conflict with 5 U.S.C. 
2302(b)(13).


Sec.  1167.2  Applicability.

    This part applies to demands and requests for factual or expert 
testimony or for official records or information in legal proceedings, 
except that it does not apply to:
    (a) Demands upon or requests for an NEH employee to testify as to 
facts or events that are in no way related to his or her official 
duties or to the functions of NEH;
    (b) Demands upon or requests for a former NEH employee to testify 
as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or 
materially involved while at NEH;
    (c) Requests for the release of records under the Freedom of 
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 
552a;
    (d) Congressional demands and requests for testimony or records; 
and
    (e) Legal proceedings to which the United States is a party.


Sec.  1167.3  Definitions.

    (a) Agency or NEH means the National Endowment for the Humanities.
    (b) Demand means a subpoena, order, or other demand of a court or 
other competent authority, issued in a legal proceeding, for the 
production of official records and information or for the testimony of 
an NEH employee.
    (c) General Counsel means the General Counsel of the agency, or any 
person to whom the General Counsel has delegated authority under this 
part.
    (d) Legal proceeding means any proceeding before a court of law, 
administrative board or commission, hearing officer, or other body 
conducting a legal or administrative proceeding.
    (e) NEH employee or employee means any present or former officer or 
employee of NEH; any other individual hired through contractual 
agreement by or on behalf of NEH, or who has performed or is performing 
services under such an agreement for NEH; and any individual who served 
or is serving on an NEH advisory committee.
    (f) Official records and information means all documents and 
material in the custody and control of NEH; relating to information in 
the custody and control of NEH; or acquired by an NEH employee in the 
performance of his or her official duties or because of his or her 
official status, while the individual was employed by or on behalf of 
the NEH.
    (g) Request means any request in connection with an ongoing or 
threatened legal proceeding, by whatever method, for the production of 
official records and information or for testimony, other than a demand.
    (h) Testimony means any written or oral statement by a witness, and 
includes depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, 
declarations, and statements at a hearing or trial.


Sec.  1167.4  Testimony and production of official records and 
information.

    (a) No employee may produce official records and information or 
provide any testimony in response to a demand or request unless 
authorized to do so by the General Counsel in accordance with this 
part.
    (b) The General Counsel, in his or her discretion, may grant an 
employee permission to testify or produce official records and 
information in response to a demand or request. In making this 
decision, the General Counsel shall consider whether:
    (1) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be 
consistent with the purposes of this part;
    (2) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be 
necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice;
    (3) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be in 
the best interest of NEH and the United States; or
    (4) NEH has an interest in the outcome of the legal proceeding.
    (c) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may 
testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge or produce 
official records and information, but, unless specifically authorized 
to do so by the General Counsel, shall not:
    (1) Disclose confidential or privileged information;
    (2) Testify as to matters regarding which the General Counsel 
determines that testimony would not be in the best interest of NEH or 
the United States;
    (3) Produce official records and information regarding which the 
General Counsel determines that production would not be in the best 
interest of NEH or the United States; or
    (4) Testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any 
matter arising out of the employee's official duties or the functions 
of NEH. (See also 5 CFR 2635.805.)


Sec.  1167.5  Procedure when demand is made.

    (a) Whenever an employee is served with a demand to testify in his 
or her official capacity, or to produce official records and 
information, the employee shall notify the General Counsel immediately.
    (b) The General Counsel shall review the demand and, in accordance 
with the provisions of Sec.  1167.4, shall determine whether, or on 
what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify and/or produce 
official records and information.
    (c) If a demand requires a response before the General Counsel has 
made the determination referred to in paragraph (b) of this section, 
the General Counsel shall provide the court or other competent 
authority with a copy of this part, inform the court or other competent 
authority that the demand is being reviewed, and seek a stay of the 
demand pending a final determination.

[[Page 212]]

    (d) If a court or other competent authority orders that an NEH 
employee comply with a demand notwithstanding a final decision by the 
General Counsel to the contrary, or at any other stage in the process, 
the General Counsel shall advise the employee on how to respond to such 
order and may arrange for legal representation of the employee.


Sec.  1167.6  Office of Inspector General employees.

    Notwithstanding the requirements set forth in Sec. Sec.  1167.1 
through 1167.5, when an employee of the agency's Office of the 
Inspector General receives a demand or request to provide testimony or 
produce official records and information, the Inspector General or his 
or her designee shall be responsible for performing the functions 
assigned to the General Counsel under this part with respect to such 
demand or request.

    Dated: December 28, 2021.
Samuel Roth,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2021-28468 Filed 1-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.