Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 73694-73699 [2021-27974]
Download as PDF
73694
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
This material may be found in the AD docket
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–1164.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Nicholas Paine, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781)
238–7116; email: Nicholas.J.Paine@faa.gov.
(3) For RRD service information identified
in this AD, contact Rolls-Royce plc,
Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 31,
Derby, DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom; phone:
+44 (0)1332 242424 fax: +44 (0)1332 249936;
website: https://www.rolls-royce.com/
contact-us.aspx. You may view this material
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
Issued on December 20, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–27980 Filed 12–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–1005; Project
Identifier AD–2021–00842–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model
747–400 series airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by a report that after
a certain circuit breaker tripped, power
to the two pitot-static (P/S) probe
heaters on the right-hand side was lost,
and the flightcrew discovered
conflicting procedures in the flightcrew
operations manual/quick reference
handbook (FCOM/QRH). This proposed
AD would require revising the existing
airplane flight manual (AFM) to
incorporate procedures to be applied
during P/S probe heater failure
conditions. The FAA is proposing this
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by February 11,
2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–1005; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
NPRM, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Huey Ton, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Section, FAA, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137;
phone: 562–627–5320; email: huey.ton@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2021–1005; Project Identifier AD–
2021–00842–T’’ at the beginning of your
comments. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Huey Ton, Aerospace
Engineer, Systems and Equipment
Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627–5320;
email: huey.ton@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA has received a report
indicating that after a certain circuit
breaker tripped, power to the two P/S
probe heaters on the right-hand side was
lost, and the flightcrew discovered
conflicting procedures in the FCOM/
QRH. Those existing procedures were
written for single P/S probe heater
failures and did not account for a
scenario where both P/S probe heaters
on one side of the airplane failed
simultaneously, therefore failing to
isolate the unheated P/S probes in this
scenario. This condition, if not
addressed, could result in the
transmission of potentially inaccurate
pitot static pressure data to the air data
computer (ADC), resulting in erroneous
or misleading air data being displayed,
which, in combination with a stall,
overspeed, overrun, or short/hard
landing conditions, could result in a
reduced ability of the flightcrew to
maintain safe flight and landing of the
airplane.
The Boeing Company has revised and
released an updated FCOM/QRH to
address this condition by replacing the
conflicting procedures with new
procedures. However, the FCOM/QRH
are not FAA-approved documents.
Therefore, the FAA has determined the
existing AFM must be revised to include
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules
procedures to address the identified
unsafe condition.
FAA’s Determination
The FAA has determined that the
identified unsafe condition only applies
to Model 747–400 series airplanes
having a three ADC configuration,
except for airplanes on which the
Production Revision Record (PRR)
85655 has been incorporated.
The FAA is issuing this NPRM after
determining that the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements in This
NPRM
This proposed AD would require
revising the existing AFM to incorporate
73695
procedures to be applied during P/S
probe heater failure conditions.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if
adopted as proposed, would affect 114
airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA
estimates the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
AFM Revision .............................................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ............
None ........................
$85
$9,690
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate
aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
(d) Subject
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
(e) Unsafe Condition
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
This AD was prompted by a report that
after a certain circuit breaker tripped, power
to the two pitot-static (P/S) probe heaters on
the right-hand side was lost, and the
flightcrew discovered conflicting procedures
in the flightcrew operations manual/quick
reference handbook (FCOM/QRH). The FAA
is issuing this AD to address the conflicting
procedures, which could result in the
transmission of potentially inaccurate pitot
static pressure data to the ADC, resulting in
erroneous or misleading air data being
displayed, which, in combination with a
stall, overspeed, overrun, or short/hard
landing condition, could result in reduced
ability of the flightcrew to maintain
continued safe flight and landing of the
airplane.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2021–1005; Project Identifier AD–2021–
00842–T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by February 11,
2022.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 747–400 series airplanes, certificated
in any category, having a three air data
computer (ADC) configuration, except for
airplanes on which the Production Revision
Record (PRR) 85655 has been incorporated.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 34, Navigation.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revisions
Within 90 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the Non-Normal Procedures
Section of the existing AFM to include the
changes specified in paragraphs (g)(1)
through (4) of this AD. Revising the existing
AFM to include the changes specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (4) of this AD, may
be done by inserting a copy of figure 1 to
paragraph (g)(1) through figure 4 to paragraph
(g)(4) of this AD into the existing AFM.
(1) In Section 2, Non-Normal Procedures,
add the ‘‘HEAT P/S CAPT’’ paragraph to
include the information in figure 1 to
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
73696
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Figure 1 to paragraph (g)(l)-AFM Revision: Heat PIS Captain
PITOT-STATIC PROBE HEAT (Required by AD 2021-**-**)
HEAT P/S CAPT
The HEAT P/S CAPT message indicates that captain's pitot static probe heat
is failed. This procedure objective is to determine whether more than one
probe heat is failed, and to select air data sources to minimize or to prevent
erroneous flight instrument indications.
Disengage the autopilot.
If EICAS message HEAT P/S CAPT is displayed and HEAT P/S LAUX is
blank, place the captain's air data source selector to R and the first officer's air
data source selector to C. Engage the R autopilot, if needed. L and C
autopilots are unreliable in icing conditions, end of procedure.
[Disengage the autopilot.]
If EICAS messages HEAT P/S CAPT and HEAT P/S LAUX are both
displayed, place the captain's air data source selector to C. Engage any
autopilot, if needed. Avoid icing conditions. Flight in icing conditions can result
in unreliable standby flight instrument indications.
Note Inoperative Items:
• Both pitot probe heaters on the left side of the airplane inoperative Avoid Icing Conditions.
• Autothrottle inoperative, Reference EPR is blank - Use manual throttle.
• LNAV and VNAV inoperative - Use HOG SEL or HOG HOLD and
FLCH, V/S or ALT HOLD.
Do not accomplish the HEAT P/S LAUX non-normal procedure, end of
procedure.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
include the information in figure 2 to
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
EP28DE21.021
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(2) In Section 2, Non-Normal Procedures,
add the ‘‘HEAT P/S F/O’’ paragraph to
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules
73697
Figure 2 to paragraph (g)(2)-AFM Revision: Heat PIS First Officer
PITOT-STATIC PROBE HEAT (CONTINUED) (Required by AD 2021-**-**)
HEAT P/S F/0
The HEAT P/S F/O message indicates that First Officer's pitot static probe
heat is failed. This procedure objective is to determine whether more than one
probe heat is failed, and to select air data sources to minimize or to prevent
erroneous flight instrument indications.
Disengage the autopilot.
If EICAS message HEAT P/S F/O is displayed and HEAT P/S R AUX is blank,
place the captain's air data source selector to C and the first officer's air data
source selector to L. Engage the L or C autopilot, if needed. R autopilot is
unreliable in icing conditions, end of procedure.
[Disengage the autopilot.]
If EICAS messages HEAT P/S F/O and HEAT P/S R AUX are both displayed,
engage the L or C autopilot, if needed. R autopilot is unreliable in icing
conditions. Avoid icing conditions. Flight in icing conditions can result in
unreliable first officer's flight instrument indications.
Note Inoperative Items:
• Both pitot probe heaters on the right side of the airplane inoperative Avoid Icing Conditions.
• Autothrottle inoperative, Reference EPR is blank - Use manual throttle.
• LNAV and VNAV inoperative - Use HOG SEL or HOG HOLD and
FLCH, V/S or ALT HOLD.
Do not accomplish the HEAT P/S R AUX non-normal procedure, end of
procedure.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
include the information in figure 3 to
paragraph (g)(3) of this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
EP28DE21.022
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(3) In Section 2, Non-Normal Procedures,
add the ‘‘HEAT P/S L AUX’’ paragraph to
73698
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Figure 3 to paragraph (g)(3)-AFM Revision: Heat PIS Left Auxiliary
PITOT-STATIC PROBE HEAT (CONTINUED) (Required by AD 2021-**-**)
HEAT P/S LAUX
The HEAT PIS LAUX message indicates that left auxiliary pitot static probe
heat is failed. This procedure objective is to determine whether more than one
probe heat is failed, and to select air data sources to minimize or to prevent
erroneous flight instrument indications.
Disengage the autopilot.
If EICAS message HEAT P/S LAUX is displayed and HEAT P/S CAPT is
blank, place the captain's air data source selector to C and the first officer's air
data source selector to L. Engage the Lor C autopilot, if needed. Avoid Icing
Conditions. Flight in icing conditions can result in unreliable standby flight
instrument indications, end of procedure.
[Disengage the autopilot.]
If EICAS messages HEAT P/S LAUX and HEAT P/S CAPT are both
displayed, place the captain's air data source selector to C. Engage any
autopilot, if needed. Avoid icing conditions. Flight in icing conditions can result
in unreliable standby flight instrument indications.
Note Inoperative Items:
• Both pitot probe heaters on the left side of the airplane are inoperative
-Avoid Icing Conditions.
• Autothrottle inoperative, Reference EPR is blank - Use manual throttle.
• LNAV and VNAV inoperative - Use HOG SEL or HOG HOLD and
FLCH, V/S or ALT HOLD.
Do not accomplish the HEAT PIS CAPT non-normal procedure, end of
procedure.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
include the information in figure 4 to
paragraph (g)(4) of this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
EP28DE21.023
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(4) In Section 2, Non-Normal Procedures,
add the ‘‘HEAT P/S R AUX’’ paragraph to
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules
73699
Figure 4 to paragraph (g)(4)-AFM Revision: Heat PIS Right Auxiliary
PITOT-STATIC PROBE HEAT (CONTINUED) (Required by AD 2021-**-**)
HEAT P/S R AUX
The HEAT P/S R AUX message indicates that right auxiliary pitot static probe
heat is failed. This procedure objective is to determine whether more than one
probe heat is failed, and to select air data sources to minimize or to prevent
erroneous flight instrument indications.
Disengage the autopilot.
If EICAS message HEAT P/S R AUX is displayed and HEAT P/S F/O is blank,
place the captain's air data source selector to R and the first officer's air data
source selector to C. Engage the R autopilot, if needed, end of procedure.
[Disengage the autopilot.]
If EICAS messages HEAT P/S R AUX and HEAT P/S F/O are both displayed,
engage the L or C autopilot, if needed. R autopilot is unreliable in icing
conditions. Avoid icing conditions. Flight in icing conditions can result in
unreliable first officer's flight instrument indications.
Note Inoperative Items:
• Both pitot probe heaters on the right side of the airplane are inoperative
-Avoid Icing Conditions.
• Autothrottle inoperative, Reference EPR is blank - Use manual throttle.
• LNAV and VNAV inoperative - Use HOG SEL or HOG HOLD and
FLCH, V/S or ALT HOLD.
Do not accomplish the HEAT P/S F/O non-normal procedure, end of
procedure.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (i)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
Issued on November 12, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–27974 Filed 12–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Huey Ton, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137;
phone: 562–627–5320; email: huey.ton@
faa.gov.
(2) For information about AMOCs, contact
Frank Carreras, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3539;
email: frank.carreras@faa.gov.
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0959; Project
Identifier AD–2021–00830–E]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney Division Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
EP28DE21.024
BILLING CODE 4910–13–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 28, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73694-73699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27974]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-1005; Project Identifier AD-2021-00842-T]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain The Boeing Company Model 747-400 series airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report that after a certain circuit
breaker tripped, power to the two pitot-static (P/S) probe heaters on
the right-hand side was lost, and the flightcrew discovered conflicting
procedures in the flightcrew operations manual/quick reference handbook
(FCOM/QRH). This proposed AD would require revising the existing
airplane flight manual (AFM) to incorporate procedures to be applied
during P/S probe heater failure conditions. The FAA is proposing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by February
11, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-1005; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Huey Ton, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5320; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-1005; Project Identifier
AD-2021-00842-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Huey
Ton, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137;
phone: 562-627-5320; email: [email protected]. Any commentary that the
FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed
in the public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA has received a report indicating that after a certain
circuit breaker tripped, power to the two P/S probe heaters on the
right-hand side was lost, and the flightcrew discovered conflicting
procedures in the FCOM/QRH. Those existing procedures were written for
single P/S probe heater failures and did not account for a scenario
where both P/S probe heaters on one side of the airplane failed
simultaneously, therefore failing to isolate the unheated P/S probes in
this scenario. This condition, if not addressed, could result in the
transmission of potentially inaccurate pitot static pressure data to
the air data computer (ADC), resulting in erroneous or misleading air
data being displayed, which, in combination with a stall, overspeed,
overrun, or short/hard landing conditions, could result in a reduced
ability of the flightcrew to maintain safe flight and landing of the
airplane.
The Boeing Company has revised and released an updated FCOM/QRH to
address this condition by replacing the conflicting procedures with new
procedures. However, the FCOM/QRH are not FAA-approved documents.
Therefore, the FAA has determined the existing AFM must be revised to
include
[[Page 73695]]
procedures to address the identified unsafe condition.
The FAA has determined that the identified unsafe condition only
applies to Model 747-400 series airplanes having a three ADC
configuration, except for airplanes on which the Production Revision
Record (PRR) 85655 has been incorporated.
FAA's Determination
The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM
This proposed AD would require revising the existing AFM to
incorporate procedures to be applied during P/S probe heater failure
conditions.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 114 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFM Revision...................... 1 work-hour x $85 None................ $85 $9,690
per hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2021-1005; Project Identifier AD-
2021-00842-T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by February 11, 2022.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400 series
airplanes, certificated in any category, having a three air data
computer (ADC) configuration, except for airplanes on which the
Production Revision Record (PRR) 85655 has been incorporated.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that after a certain circuit
breaker tripped, power to the two pitot-static (P/S) probe heaters
on the right-hand side was lost, and the flightcrew discovered
conflicting procedures in the flightcrew operations manual/quick
reference handbook (FCOM/QRH). The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the conflicting procedures, which could result in the transmission
of potentially inaccurate pitot static pressure data to the ADC,
resulting in erroneous or misleading air data being displayed,
which, in combination with a stall, overspeed, overrun, or short/
hard landing condition, could result in reduced ability of the
flightcrew to maintain continued safe flight and landing of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revisions
Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
Non-Normal Procedures Section of the existing AFM to include the
changes specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (4) of this AD.
Revising the existing AFM to include the changes specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (4) of this AD, may be done by inserting a
copy of figure 1 to paragraph (g)(1) through figure 4 to paragraph
(g)(4) of this AD into the existing AFM.
(1) In Section 2, Non-Normal Procedures, add the ``HEAT P/S
CAPT'' paragraph to include the information in figure 1 to paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[[Page 73696]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE21.021
(2) In Section 2, Non-Normal Procedures, add the ``HEAT P/S F/
O'' paragraph to include the information in figure 2 to paragraph
(g)(2) of this AD.
[[Page 73697]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE21.022
(3) In Section 2, Non-Normal Procedures, add the ``HEAT P/S L
AUX'' paragraph to include the information in figure 3 to paragraph
(g)(3) of this AD.
[[Page 73698]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE21.023
(4) In Section 2, Non-Normal Procedures, add the ``HEAT P/S R
AUX'' paragraph to include the information in figure 4 to paragraph
(g)(4) of this AD.
[[Page 73699]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28DE21.024
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Huey Ton,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137;
phone: 562-627-5320; email: [email protected].
(2) For information about AMOCs, contact Frank Carreras,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:
206-231-3539; email: [email protected].
Issued on November 12, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-27974 Filed 12-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P