Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes, 73197-73200 [2021-27834]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 245 / Monday, December 27, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32, Landing Gear.
the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of inservice findings of corrosion on the flange of
the main landing gear (MLG) lower spindle
pin. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
corrosion and subsequent cracking of the
MLG lower spindle pin, which could result
in failure of the pin, and consequent collapse
of the MLG.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA) AD CF–2021–22, issued
July 5, 2021 (TCCA AD CF–2021–22).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Exceptions to TCCA AD 2021–22
(1) Where TCCA AD CF–2021–22 refers to
May 20, 2021, the effective date of TCCA AD
CF–2021–18, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where the service information
identified in TCCA AD CF–2021–22 specifies
to report inspection results, for this AD,
report only positive findings of the first four
inspections at the applicable time specified
in paragraph (h)(2)(i) or (ii) of this AD.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Submit the
report within 30 days after the inspection.
(ii) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD.
(i) Additional AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 516–
228–7300; fax: 516–794–5531. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible
Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
FAA; or TCCA; or Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership’s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Dec 23, 2021
Jkt 256001
(j) Related Information
(1) For TCCA AD CF–2021–22, contact
TCCA, Transport Canada National Aircraft
Certification, 159 Cleopatra Drive, Nepean,
Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada; telephone 888–
663–3639; email AD-CN@tc.gc.ca; internet
https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation. You may
view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. This
material may be found in the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–1076.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Chirayu Gupta, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative
Services Section, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–
7300; fax 516–794–5531; email 9-avs-nyacocos@faa.gov.
Issued on December 16, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–27833 Filed 12–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–1075; Project
Identifier MCAI–2021–00856–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020–26–01, which applies to all Airbus
SAS Model A318–111, –112, –121, and
–122 airplanes; Model A319–111, –112,
–113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and –133
airplanes; and Model A320–211, –212,
–214, –216, –231, –232, and –233
airplanes. AD 2020–26–01 requires
repetitive general visual inspections of
the affected main landing gear (MLG)
sliding tubes for cracks and replacement
if necessary. Since the FAA issued AD
2020–26–01, additional parts and
additional airplane models have been
identified that may also have been
subject to an improper overhaul and are
therefore unsafe. This proposed AD
would require repetitive general visual
inspections of the affected MLG sliding
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
73197
tubes (both retained affected parts and
additional affected parts) for cracks and
replacement if necessary, as specified in
a European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed
for incorporation by reference. This
proposed AD would also add airplanes
to the applicability. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by February 10,
2022.
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For material that will be incorporated
by reference (IBR) in this AD, contact
the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49
221 8999 000; email ADs@
easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
IBR material on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this IBR material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
1075.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
1075; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
73198
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 245 / Monday, December 27, 2021 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Discussion
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FAA issued AD 2020–26–01,
Amendment 39–21356 (85 FR 82299,
December 18, 2020) (AD 2020–26–01),
which applies to all Airbus SAS Model
A318–111, –112, –121, and –122
airplanes; Model A319–111, –112, –113,
–114, –115, –131, –132, and –133
airplanes; and Model A320–211, –212,
–214, –216, –231, –232, and –233
airplanes. AD 2020–26–01 requires
repetitive general visual inspections of
the MLG sliding tubes for cracks, and
replacement if necessary. The FAA
issued AD 2020–26–01 to address cracks
on the MLG sliding tubes, which could
cause MLG sliding tube fracture, and
could result in the MLG collapsing,
damage to the airplane, and injury to
occupants.
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2021–1075; Project Identifier
MCAI–2021–00856–T’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend the proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposed
AD.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax
206–231–3223. Any commentary that
the FAA receives which is not
specifically designated as CBI will be
placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Dec 23, 2021
Jkt 256001
Actions Since AD 2020–26–01 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2020–26–
01, additional parts and additional
airplane models have been identified
that may also have been subject to an
improper overhaul and are therefore
unsafe.
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2021–0175,
dated July 22, 2021; corrected July 23,
2021 (EASA AD 2021–0175) (also
referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the
MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Airbus SAS A318–111, A318–
112, A318–121, A318–122, A319–111,
A319–112, A319–113, A319–114, A319–
115, A319–131, A319–132, A319–133,
A320–211, A320–212, A320–214, A320–
215, A320–216, A320–231, A320–232,
A320–233, A321–111, A321–112, A321–
131, A321–211, A321–212, A321–213,
A321–231, and A321–232 airplanes.
EASA AD 2021–0175 supersedes EASA
AD 2020–0258 (which corresponds to
FAA AD 2020–26–01). Model A320–215
airplanes are not certificated by the FAA
and are not included on the U.S. type
certificate data sheet; this proposed AD
therefore does not include those
airplanes in the applicability.
This proposed AD was prompted by
reports of cracks found on additional
MLG sliding tubes that may have been
subject to the same improperly
performed magnetic particle inspection
as the MLG sliding tubes identified in
AD 2020–26–01. The FAA is proposing
this AD to address cracks on the MLG
sliding tubes, which could cause MLG
sliding tube fracture, and could result in
the MLG collapsing, damage to the
airplane, and injury to occupants. See
the MCAI for additional background
information.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Explanation of Retained Requirements
Although this proposed AD does not
explicitly restate the requirements of AD
2020–26–01, this proposed AD would
retain all of the requirements of AD
2020–26–01. Those requirements are
referenced in EASA AD 2021–0175,
which, in turn, is referenced in
paragraph (g) of this proposed AD.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2021–0175 describes
procedures for repetitive general visual
inspections of the MLG sliding tubes for
cracks, and replacement if necessary.
EASA AD 2021–0175 also describes
terminating actions for the repetitive
inspections of affected MLG sliding
tubes by either overhauling an affected
MLG sliding tube or replacing an
affected MLG sliding tube with an MLG
sliding tube that is not affected.
This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the State
of Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI referenced
above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2021–0175 described
previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to
use some civil aviation authority (CAA)
ADs as the primary source of
information for compliance with
requirements for corresponding FAA
ADs. The FAA has been coordinating
this process with manufacturers and
CAAs. As a result, the FAA proposes to
incorporate EASA AD 2021–0175 by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 245 / Monday, December 27, 2021 / Proposed Rules
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2021–0175
in its entirety through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same
as the heading of a particular section in
EASA AD 2021–0175 does not mean
that operators need comply only with
that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in EASA AD 2021–0175.
Service information required by EASA
AD 2021–0175 for compliance will be
available at https://www.regulations.gov
73199
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–1075 after the FAA final
rule is published.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 1,524 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this
proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Action
Labor cost
Retained actions from AD 2020–26–01 .........
New proposed actions ....................................
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 .............
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 .............
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required based on
Cost per
product
Parts cost
the results of any required actions. The
FAA has no way of determining the
$0
0
$170
170
Cost on U.S.
operators
$259,080
259,080
number of aircraft that might need these
on-condition actions:
ESTIMATED COSTS OF ON-CONDITION ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
19 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,615 .................................................................................................................
$185
$1,800
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
16:26 Dec 23, 2021
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA–2021–1075;
Project Identifier MCAI–2021–00856–T.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
This AD applies to all Airbus SAS
airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (4) of this AD, certificated in any
category.
(1) Model A318–111, –112, –121, and –122
airplanes.
(2) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
–115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes.
(3) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –216,
–231, –232, and –233 airplanes.
(4) Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211,
–212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
Jkt 256001
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by
February 10, 2022.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
This AD replaces AD 2020–26–01,
Amendment 39–21356 (85 FR 82299,
December 18, 2020) (AD 2020–26–01).
(c) Applicability
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
(d) Subject
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
(e) Reason
■
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
■ a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2020–26–01, Amendment 39–
21356 (85 FR 82299, December 18,
2020); and
■ b. Adding the following new AD:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32, Landing gear.
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks
found on main landing gear (MLG) sliding
tubes that may have been subject to
improperly performed magnetic particle
inspection. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address cracks on the MLG sliding tubes,
which could cause MLG sliding tube fracture,
and could result in the MLG collapsing,
damage to the airplane, and injury to
occupants.
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
73200
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 245 / Monday, December 27, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2021–0175, dated
July 22, 2021; corrected July 23, 2021 (EASA
AD 2021–0175).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021–0175
(1) Where EASA AD 2021–0175 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where EASA AD 2021–0175 refers to
July 10, 2018 (the effective date of EASA AD
2018–0136, dated June 26, 2018), this AD
requires using April 9, 2019 (the effective
date of AD 2019–03–18, Amendment 39–
19570 (84 FR 7804, March 5, 2019).
(3) Where EASA AD 2021–0175 refers to
December 2, 2020 (the effective date of EASA
AD 2020–0258, dated November 18, 2020;
corrected November 19. 2020), this AD
requires using January 4, 2021 (the effective
date of AD 2020–26–01).
(4) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2021–
0175 specifies compliance times to do the
initial inspection, for this AD, the initial
inspection must be done within the
applicable compliance time specified in
paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2021–0175, or
within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later.
(5) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2021–0175 does not apply to this AD.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2021–0175 specifies
to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible
Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Dec 23, 2021
Jkt 256001
EASA; or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any
service information referenced in EASA AD
2021–0175 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (j)(2)
of this AD and as specified in paragraph (i)
of this AD, RC procedures and tests must be
done to comply with this AD; any procedures
or tests that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in accordance
with the operator’s maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the
procedures and tests identified as RC can be
done and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2021–
0175, contact the EASA, Konrad-AdenauerUfer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 8999 000; email ADs@
easa.europa.eu; Internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. This
material may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–1075.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3223.
Issued on December 16, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–27834 Filed 12–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2021–1147; Airspace
Docket No. 21–AGL–37]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Establishment of Class E
Airspace; Pembina, ND
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This action proposes to
amend the Class E airspace at Pembina,
ND. The FAA is proposing this action
due to an airspace review conducted as
part of the decommissioning of the
Humbolt very high frequency (VHF)
omnidirectional range (VOR) as part of
the VOR Minimal Operational Network
(MON) Program. The geographic
coordinates of the airport would also be
updated to coincide with the FAA’s
aeronautical database.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 10, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must
identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2021–
1147/Airspace Docket No. 21–AGL–37
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_
traffic/publications/. For further
information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783. FAA Order
JO 7400.11F is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email:
fr.inspection@nara.gov or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 245 (Monday, December 27, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73197-73200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27834]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-1075; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00856-T]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020-26-01, which applies to all Airbus SAS Model A318-111, -112, -121,
and -122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132,
and -133 airplanes; and Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232,
and -233 airplanes. AD 2020-26-01 requires repetitive general visual
inspections of the affected main landing gear (MLG) sliding tubes for
cracks and replacement if necessary. Since the FAA issued AD 2020-26-
01, additional parts and additional airplane models have been
identified that may also have been subject to an improper overhaul and
are therefore unsafe. This proposed AD would require repetitive general
visual inspections of the affected MLG sliding tubes (both retained
affected parts and additional affected parts) for cracks and
replacement if necessary, as specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation by
reference. This proposed AD would also add airplanes to the
applicability. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by February
10, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available in
the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-1075.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
1075; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
[[Page 73198]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-1075; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-00856-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposed AD.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 2020-26-01, Amendment 39-21356 (85 FR 82299,
December 18, 2020) (AD 2020-26-01), which applies to all Airbus SAS
Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -
113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 airplanes; and Model A320-211, -
212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes. AD 2020-26-01 requires
repetitive general visual inspections of the MLG sliding tubes for
cracks, and replacement if necessary. The FAA issued AD 2020-26-01 to
address cracks on the MLG sliding tubes, which could cause MLG sliding
tube fracture, and could result in the MLG collapsing, damage to the
airplane, and injury to occupants.
Actions Since AD 2020-26-01 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2020-26-01, additional parts and additional
airplane models have been identified that may also have been subject to
an improper overhaul and are therefore unsafe.
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2021-0175, dated July 22, 2021;
corrected July 23, 2021 (EASA AD 2021-0175) (also referred to as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to
correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS A318-111, A318-112,
A318-121, A318-122, A319-111, A319-112, A319-113, A319-114, A319-115,
A319-131, A319-132, A319-133, A320-211, A320-212, A320-214, A320-215,
A320-216, A320-231, A320-232, A320-233, A321-111, A321-112, A321-131,
A321-211, A321-212, A321-213, A321-231, and A321-232 airplanes. EASA AD
2021-0175 supersedes EASA AD 2020-0258 (which corresponds to FAA AD
2020-26-01). Model A320-215 airplanes are not certificated by the FAA
and are not included on the U.S. type certificate data sheet; this
proposed AD therefore does not include those airplanes in the
applicability.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracks found on
additional MLG sliding tubes that may have been subject to the same
improperly performed magnetic particle inspection as the MLG sliding
tubes identified in AD 2020-26-01. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address cracks on the MLG sliding tubes, which could cause MLG sliding
tube fracture, and could result in the MLG collapsing, damage to the
airplane, and injury to occupants. See the MCAI for additional
background information.
Explanation of Retained Requirements
Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate the
requirements of AD 2020-26-01, this proposed AD would retain all of the
requirements of AD 2020-26-01. Those requirements are referenced in
EASA AD 2021-0175, which, in turn, is referenced in paragraph (g) of
this proposed AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2021-0175 describes procedures for repetitive general
visual inspections of the MLG sliding tubes for cracks, and replacement
if necessary. EASA AD 2021-0175 also describes terminating actions for
the repetitive inspections of affected MLG sliding tubes by either
overhauling an affected MLG sliding tube or replacing an affected MLG
sliding tube with an MLG sliding tube that is not affected.
This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD because the FAA
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2021-0175 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2021-0175 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This
[[Page 73199]]
proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2021-0175
in its entirety through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in EASA AD 2021-0175 does not mean that operators need comply
only with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2021-0175. Service information
required by EASA AD 2021-0175 for compliance will be available at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-1075 after the FAA final rule is published.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 1,524 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained actions from AD 2020-26-01... 2 work-hours x $85 per $0 $170 $259,080
hour = $170.
New proposed actions.................. 2 work-hours x $85 per 0 170 259,080
hour = $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:
Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19 work-hours x $85 per hour = $1,615......................................... $185 $1,800
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020-26-01, Amendment 39-21356
(85 FR 82299, December 18, 2020); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2021-1075; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-
00856-T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by February 10, 2022.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
This AD replaces AD 2020-26-01, Amendment 39-21356 (85 FR 82299,
December 18, 2020) (AD 2020-26-01).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus SAS airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD, certificated in any
category.
(1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
(2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
(3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes.
(4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks found on main landing
gear (MLG) sliding tubes that may have been subject to improperly
performed magnetic particle inspection. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address cracks on the MLG sliding tubes, which could cause MLG
sliding tube fracture, and could result in the MLG collapsing,
damage to the airplane, and injury to occupants.
[[Page 73200]]
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2021-0175, dated July 22, 2021; corrected July 23, 2021 (EASA AD
2021-0175).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021-0175
(1) Where EASA AD 2021-0175 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where EASA AD 2021-0175 refers to July 10, 2018 (the
effective date of EASA AD 2018-0136, dated June 26, 2018), this AD
requires using April 9, 2019 (the effective date of AD 2019-03-18,
Amendment 39-19570 (84 FR 7804, March 5, 2019).
(3) Where EASA AD 2021-0175 refers to December 2, 2020 (the
effective date of EASA AD 2020-0258, dated November 18, 2020;
corrected November 19. 2020), this AD requires using January 4, 2021
(the effective date of AD 2020-26-01).
(4) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2021-0175 specifies
compliance times to do the initial inspection, for this AD, the
initial inspection must be done within the applicable compliance
time specified in paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2021-0175, or within 30
days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(5) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2021-0175 does not apply
to this AD.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2021-0175
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2021-0175 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD and as
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD, RC procedures and tests must
be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not
identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that
are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods
in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program
without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and
tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back
in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to
procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2021-0175, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email [email protected]; Internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. This material may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2021-1075.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax 206-231-3223.
Issued on December 16, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-27834 Filed 12-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P