Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2022, 73004-73006 [2021-27955]

Download as PDF 73004 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 244 / Thursday, December 23, 2021 / Notices EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM: POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF RECORDS: None. The records in this system are stored electronically on MSPB’s local area network or with FedRAMP-authorized cloud service providers. Access is limited to a small number of authorized personnel at MSPB. In addition, if paper records exist, they are stored in locked file cabinets in access-restricted offices. POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF RECORDS: POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL SAFEGUARDS: RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: Individuals seeking notification of and access to their records in this system of records may submit a request in writing to the Office of the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20419. Individuals requesting access must comply with MSPB’s Privacy Act regulations regarding verification of identity and access to records (5 CFR part 1205). CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2022 Millennium Challenge Corporation. ACTION: Notice. This report is provided in accordance with the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as amended. The report is set forth in full below. Authority: Section 608(d)(2) of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 7707(d)(2) (the Act). SUMMARY: Dated: December 20, 2021. Thomas G. Hohenthaner, Acting VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2022 Records in the system are protected from unauthorized access and misuse through various administrative, technical, and physical security measures, such as access controls, mandatory security and privacy training, encryption, multi-factor authentication, security guards, and locked offices. Individuals may request that records about them be amended by writing to the Office of the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20419. Individuals requesting amendment must follow MSPB’s Privacy Act regulations regarding verification of identity and amendment to records (5 CFR part 1205). NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: See Record Access Procedures above. Jkt 256001 BILLING CODE 7400–01–P AGENCY: The records maintained in this system of records are subject to NARA General Records Schedule (GRS) 2.3 (Employee Relations Records), Item 20 (Reasonable accommodation case files). NARA GRS 2.3 instructs disposition three years after employee separation from the agency or all appeals are concluded, whichever is later, but longer retention is authorized if required for business use. 20:50 Dec 22, 2021 None. [FR Doc. 2021–27874 Filed 12–22–21; 8:45 am] [MCC FR 21–13] Records may be retrieved by name or other unique personal identifier. VerDate Sep<11>2014 HISTORY: Summary This report is provided in accordance with section 608(d)(1) of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as amended (the Act) (22 U.S.C. 7707(d)(1)). The Act authorizes the provision of assistance under section 605 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7704) to countries that enter into compacts with the United States to support policies and programs that advance the progress of such countries in achieving lasting poverty reduction through economic growth, and are in furtherance of the Act. The Act requires the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) to determine the countries that will be eligible to receive assistance for the fiscal year, based on their demonstrated commitment to just and democratic governance, economic freedom, and investing in their people, as well as on the opportunity to reduce poverty through economic growth in the country. The Act also requires the submission of reports to appropriate congressional committees and the publication of notices in the Federal Register that identify, among other things: 1. The countries that are ‘‘candidate countries’’ for assistance for fiscal year (FY) 2022 based on their per-capita income levels and their eligibility to PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 receive assistance under U.S. law, and countries that would be candidate countries, but for specified legal prohibitions on assistance (section 608(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(a))); 2. The criteria and methodology that the Board of Directors of MCC (the Board) used to measure and evaluate the policy performance of the ‘‘candidate countries’’ consistent with the requirements of section 607 of the Act in order to determine ‘‘eligible countries’’ from among the ‘‘candidate countries’’ (section 608(b) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(b))); and 3. The list of countries determined by the Board to be ‘‘eligible countries’’ for FY 2022, with justification for eligibility determination and selection for compact negotiation, including with which of the eligible countries the Board will seek to enter into compacts (section 608(d) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(d))). This is the third of the abovedescribed reports by MCC for FY 2022. It identifies countries determined by the Board to be eligible under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706) for FY 2022 with which the MCC will seek to enter into compacts under section 609 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7708), as well as the justification for such decisions. The report also identifies countries selected by the Board to receive assistance under MCC’s threshold program pursuant to section 616 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7715). Eligible Countries The Board met on December 14, 2021 to select those eligible countries with which the United States, through MCC, will seek to enter into a Millennium Challenge Compact pursuant to section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706). The Board selected the following eligible countries for such assistance for FY 2022: Belize and Zambia. The Board also selected the following previously selected countries for compact assistance for FY 2022: Benin, Burkina Faso, Coˆte d’Ivoire, Indonesia, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Niger, Sierra Leone, and Timor-Leste. Criteria In accordance with the Act and with the ‘‘Report on the Criteria and Methodology for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance in Fiscal Year 2022’’ formally submitted to Congress on September 29, 2021, selection was based primarily on a country’s overall performance in three broad policy categories: Ruling Justly, Encouraging Economic Freedom, and Investing in People. The Board relied, to the fullest extent possible, upon transparent and E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM 23DEN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 244 / Thursday, December 23, 2021 / Notices independent indicators to assess countries’ policy performance and demonstrated commitment in these three broad policy areas. The Board compared countries’ performance on the indicators relative to their income-level peers, evaluating them in comparison to either the group of countries with a GNI per capita equal to or less than $1,965, or the group with a GNI per capita between $1,966 and $4,095. The criteria and methodology used to assess countries on the annual scorecards are outlined in the ‘‘Report on the Criteria and Methodology for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance for Fiscal Year 2022.’’ 1 Scorecards reflecting each country’s performance on the indicators are available on MCC’s website at https://www.mcc.gov/who-we-select/ scorecards. The Board also considered whether any adjustments should be made for data gaps, data lags, or recent events since the indicators were published, as well as strengths or weaknesses in particular indicators. Where appropriate, the Board took into account additional quantitative and qualitative information, such as evidence of a country’s commitment to fighting corruption, investments in human development outcomes, or poverty rates. In keeping with legislative directives, the Board also considered the opportunity to reduce poverty and promote economic growth in a country, in light of the overall information available, as well as the availability of appropriated funds. The Board sees the selection decision as an annual opportunity to determine where MCC funds can be most effectively used to support poverty reduction through economic growth in relatively well-governed, poor countries. The Board carefully considers the appropriate nature of each country partnership—on a case-by-case basis— based on factors related to poverty reduction through economic growth, the sustainability of MCC’s investments, and the country’s ability to attract and leverage public and private resources in support of development. This was the fourth year the Board considered the eligibility of countries for concurrent compacts. In addition to the considerations for compact eligibility detailed above, the Board considered whether a country being considered for a concurrent compact is making considerable and demonstrable 1 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/ doc/report-selection-criteria-methodology-fy22. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:50 Dec 22, 2021 Jkt 256001 progress in implementing the terms of its existing compact. This was the thirteenth year the Board considered the eligibility of countries for subsequent compacts, as permitted under section 609(l) of the Act. MCC’s engagement with partner countries is not open-ended, and the Board is deliberate when selecting countries for follow-on partnerships, particularly regarding the higher bar applicable to subsequent compact countries. In making these selection decisions, the Board considered—in addition to the criteria outlined above—the country’s performance implementing its prior compact, including the nature of the country’s partnership with MCC, the degree to which the country has demonstrated a commitment and capacity to achieve program results, and the degree to which the country implemented the compact in accordance with MCC’s core policies and standards. To the greatest extent possible, these factors were assessed using pre-existing monitoring and evaluation targets and regular quarterly reporting. This information was supplemented with direct surveys and consultation with MCC staff responsible for compact implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. MCC published a Guide to Supplemental Information 2 and related webpages 3 regarding how MCC assesses performance on the Access to Credit, Land Rights and Access, and Business Start-Up indicators on the scorecard, in order to increase transparency about the type of supplemental information the Board uses to assess a country’s policy performance. The Board also considered a country’s commitment to further sector reform, as well as evidence of improved scorecard policy performance. In addition, this is the sixth year where the Board considered an explicit higher bar for those countries close to the upper end of the candidate pool, looking closely in such cases at a country’s access to development financing, the nature of poverty in the country, and its policy performance. Countries Newly Selected for Compact Assistance Using the criteria described above, two candidate countries under section 606(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7705(a) were newly selected for assistance under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706): Belize and Zambia. In accordance with 2 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/ doc/guide-to-supplemental-information. 3 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/blog/entry/ blog-101921-financial-inclusion (Access to Credit and Land Rights and Access) and https:// www.mcc.gov/who-we-select/indicators/doingbusiness-indicators-fy22 (Business Start-Up). PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 73005 section 609(k) of the Act, no candidate countries were newly selected to explore development of a concurrent compact program under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706). Belize: Belize offers MCC the opportunity to engage with a country that is committed to democratic governance but that faces rising poverty rates, significant challenges to economic growth, and vulnerability to external shocks. Belize meets the scorecard criteria, passing 13 of 20 indicators overall in FY 2022, with strong performance on both the Control of Corruption and Democratic Rights ‘‘hard hurdles.’’ By selecting Belize for a compact, MCC will support the government’s efforts to strengthen economic growth to reduce poverty and address the development challenges facing the country. Zambia: Zambia’s recent democratic transition and demonstrated commitment to pursuing critical economic and democratic governance reforms contributed to the Board’s decision to select Zambia for a subsequent compact. Zambia passes the scorecard in FY 2022, passing 15 of 20 indicators overall, including both the Control of Corruption and Democratic Rights ‘‘hard hurdles.’’ By selecting Zambia for a compact, MCC can support the government’s efforts to make key economic and governance reforms, reduce poverty and strengthen economic growth, and address the country’s pressing development challenges. Countries Selected To Continue Compact Development Ten of the countries selected for compact assistance for FY 2022 were previously selected for FY 2021. Indonesia, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, and TimorLeste were selected to continue developing ‘‘domestic’’ compacts. Benin, Burkina Faso, Coˆte d’Ivoire, and Niger were selected to continue developing concurrent compacts for the purpose of regional integration. Selection of these countries for FY 2022 was based on an assessment of their policy performance since their prior selection. Although the Board reselected Benin, it endorsed MCC’s determination to significantly reduce the portion of the planned regional investment that would be made in Benin through a concurrent compact due to Benin’s multi-year decline in its commitment to the principles that underpin MCC’s eligibility criteria, including the core principles of democratic governance. E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM 23DEN1 73006 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 244 / Thursday, December 23, 2021 / Notices Countries Selected To Receive Threshold Program Assistance The Board did not newly select any countries to receive threshold program assistance for FY 2022. Countries Selected To Continue Developing Threshold Programs The Board selected Kenya and Kiribati to continue developing threshold programs. Selection of these countries for FY 2022 was based on their continued performance since their prior selection. Ongoing Review of Partner Countries’ Policy Performance The Board emphasized the need for all partner countries to maintain or improve their policy performance. If it is determined during compact implementation that a country has demonstrated a significant policy reversal, MCC can hold it accountable by applying MCC’s Suspension and Termination Policy.4 [FR Doc. 2021–27955 Filed 12–21–21; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 9211–03–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. MC2022–32 and CP2022–39; MC2022–33 and CP2022–40] New Postal Products Postal Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission is noticing recent Postal Service filings for the Commission’s consideration concerning negotiated service agreements. This notice informs the public of the filings, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. DATES: Comments are due: December 28, 2021. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 4 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/who-weselect/suspension-or-termination. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:50 Dec 22, 2021 Jkt 256001 I. Introduction The Commission gives notice that the Postal Service filed request(s) for the Commission to consider matters related to negotiated service agreement(s). The request(s) may propose the addition or removal of a negotiated service agreement from the market dominant or the competitive product list, or the modification of an existing product currently appearing on the market dominant or the competitive product list. Section II identifies the docket number(s) associated with each Postal Service request, the title of each Postal Service request, the request’s acceptance date, and the authority cited by the Postal Service for each request. For each request, the Commission appoints an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in the proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 (Public Representative). Section II also establishes comment deadline(s) pertaining to each request. The public portions of the Postal Service’s request(s) can be accessed via the Commission’s website (https:// www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of the Postal Service’s request(s), if any, can be accessed through compliance with the requirements of 39 CFR 3011.301.1 The Commission invites comments on whether the Postal Service’s request(s) in the captioned docket(s) are consistent with the policies of title 39. For request(s) that the Postal Service states concern market dominant product(s), applicable statutory and regulatory requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s) that the Postal Service states concern competitive product(s), applicable statutory and regulatory requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3035, and 39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. Comment deadline(s) for each request appear in section II. II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 1. Docket No(s).: MC2022–32 and CP2022–39; Filing Title: USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 734 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: December 17, 2021; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public Representative: 1 See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information, June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No. 4679). PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Christopher C. Mohr; Comments Due: December 28, 2021. 2. Docket No(s).: MC2022–33 and CP2022–40; Filing Title: USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 128 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: December 17, 2021; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public Representative: Kenneth R. Moeller; Comments Due: December 28, 2021. This Notice will be published in the Federal Register. Erica A. Barker, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2021–27865 Filed 12–22–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–93825; File No. SR– CboeBZX–2021–082] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Make Juneteenth National Independence Day a Holiday of the Exchange December 17, 2021. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on December 6, 2021, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) proposes to amend its rules to make Juneteenth National Independence Day a holiday of the Exchange. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/ equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. 1 15 2 17 E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 23DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 244 (Thursday, December 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73004-73006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27955]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

[MCC FR 21-13]


Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 
2022

AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This report is provided in accordance with the Millennium 
Challenge Act of 2003, as amended. The report is set forth in full 
below.
    Authority: Section 608(d)(2) of the Millennium Challenge Act of 
2003, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 7707(d)(2) (the Act).

    Dated: December 20, 2021.
Thomas G. Hohenthaner,
Acting VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.

Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2022

Summary

    This report is provided in accordance with section 608(d)(1) of the 
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as amended (the Act) (22 U.S.C. 
7707(d)(1)).
    The Act authorizes the provision of assistance under section 605 of 
the Act (22 U.S.C. 7704) to countries that enter into compacts with the 
United States to support policies and programs that advance the 
progress of such countries in achieving lasting poverty reduction 
through economic growth, and are in furtherance of the Act. The Act 
requires the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) to determine the 
countries that will be eligible to receive assistance for the fiscal 
year, based on their demonstrated commitment to just and democratic 
governance, economic freedom, and investing in their people, as well as 
on the opportunity to reduce poverty through economic growth in the 
country. The Act also requires the submission of reports to appropriate 
congressional committees and the publication of notices in the Federal 
Register that identify, among other things:
    1. The countries that are ``candidate countries'' for assistance 
for fiscal year (FY) 2022 based on their per-capita income levels and 
their eligibility to receive assistance under U.S. law, and countries 
that would be candidate countries, but for specified legal prohibitions 
on assistance (section 608(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(a)));
    2. The criteria and methodology that the Board of Directors of MCC 
(the Board) used to measure and evaluate the policy performance of the 
``candidate countries'' consistent with the requirements of section 607 
of the Act in order to determine ``eligible countries'' from among the 
``candidate countries'' (section 608(b) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 
7707(b))); and
    3. The list of countries determined by the Board to be ``eligible 
countries'' for FY 2022, with justification for eligibility 
determination and selection for compact negotiation, including with 
which of the eligible countries the Board will seek to enter into 
compacts (section 608(d) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(d))).
    This is the third of the above-described reports by MCC for FY 
2022. It identifies countries determined by the Board to be eligible 
under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706) for FY 2022 with which 
the MCC will seek to enter into compacts under section 609 of the Act 
(22 U.S.C. 7708), as well as the justification for such decisions. The 
report also identifies countries selected by the Board to receive 
assistance under MCC's threshold program pursuant to section 616 of the 
Act (22 U.S.C. 7715).

Eligible Countries

    The Board met on December 14, 2021 to select those eligible 
countries with which the United States, through MCC, will seek to enter 
into a Millennium Challenge Compact pursuant to section 607 of the Act 
(22 U.S.C. 7706). The Board selected the following eligible countries 
for such assistance for FY 2022: Belize and Zambia. The Board also 
selected the following previously selected countries for compact 
assistance for FY 2022: Benin, Burkina Faso, C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire, 
Indonesia, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Niger, Sierra Leone, and Timor-
Leste.
Criteria
    In accordance with the Act and with the ``Report on the Criteria 
and Methodology for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries 
for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance in Fiscal Year 2022'' 
formally submitted to Congress on September 29, 2021, selection was 
based primarily on a country's overall performance in three broad 
policy categories: Ruling Justly, Encouraging Economic Freedom, and 
Investing in People. The Board relied, to the fullest extent possible, 
upon transparent and

[[Page 73005]]

independent indicators to assess countries' policy performance and 
demonstrated commitment in these three broad policy areas. The Board 
compared countries' performance on the indicators relative to their 
income-level peers, evaluating them in comparison to either the group 
of countries with a GNI per capita equal to or less than $1,965, or the 
group with a GNI per capita between $1,966 and $4,095.
    The criteria and methodology used to assess countries on the annual 
scorecards are outlined in the ``Report on the Criteria and Methodology 
for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries for Millennium 
Challenge Account Assistance for Fiscal Year 2022.'' \1\ Scorecards 
reflecting each country's performance on the indicators are available 
on MCC's website at https://www.mcc.gov/who-we-select/scorecards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/report-selection-criteria-methodology-fy22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board also considered whether any adjustments should be made 
for data gaps, data lags, or recent events since the indicators were 
published, as well as strengths or weaknesses in particular indicators. 
Where appropriate, the Board took into account additional quantitative 
and qualitative information, such as evidence of a country's commitment 
to fighting corruption, investments in human development outcomes, or 
poverty rates. In keeping with legislative directives, the Board also 
considered the opportunity to reduce poverty and promote economic 
growth in a country, in light of the overall information available, as 
well as the availability of appropriated funds.
    The Board sees the selection decision as an annual opportunity to 
determine where MCC funds can be most effectively used to support 
poverty reduction through economic growth in relatively well-governed, 
poor countries. The Board carefully considers the appropriate nature of 
each country partnership--on a case-by-case basis--based on factors 
related to poverty reduction through economic growth, the 
sustainability of MCC's investments, and the country's ability to 
attract and leverage public and private resources in support of 
development.
    This was the fourth year the Board considered the eligibility of 
countries for concurrent compacts. In addition to the considerations 
for compact eligibility detailed above, the Board considered whether a 
country being considered for a concurrent compact is making 
considerable and demonstrable progress in implementing the terms of its 
existing compact.
    This was the thirteenth year the Board considered the eligibility 
of countries for subsequent compacts, as permitted under section 609(l) 
of the Act. MCC's engagement with partner countries is not open-ended, 
and the Board is deliberate when selecting countries for follow-on 
partnerships, particularly regarding the higher bar applicable to 
subsequent compact countries. In making these selection decisions, the 
Board considered--in addition to the criteria outlined above--the 
country's performance implementing its prior compact, including the 
nature of the country's partnership with MCC, the degree to which the 
country has demonstrated a commitment and capacity to achieve program 
results, and the degree to which the country implemented the compact in 
accordance with MCC's core policies and standards. To the greatest 
extent possible, these factors were assessed using pre-existing 
monitoring and evaluation targets and regular quarterly reporting. This 
information was supplemented with direct surveys and consultation with 
MCC staff responsible for compact implementation, monitoring, and 
evaluation. MCC published a Guide to Supplemental Information \2\ and 
related webpages \3\ regarding how MCC assesses performance on the 
Access to Credit, Land Rights and Access, and Business Start-Up 
indicators on the scorecard, in order to increase transparency about 
the type of supplemental information the Board uses to assess a 
country's policy performance. The Board also considered a country's 
commitment to further sector reform, as well as evidence of improved 
scorecard policy performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/guide-to-supplemental-information.
    \3\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/blog/entry/blog-101921-financial-inclusion (Access to Credit and Land Rights and Access) 
and https://www.mcc.gov/who-we-select/indicators/doing-business-indicators-fy22 (Business Start-Up).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, this is the sixth year where the Board considered an 
explicit higher bar for those countries close to the upper end of the 
candidate pool, looking closely in such cases at a country's access to 
development financing, the nature of poverty in the country, and its 
policy performance.
Countries Newly Selected for Compact Assistance
    Using the criteria described above, two candidate countries under 
section 606(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7705(a) were newly selected for 
assistance under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706): Belize and 
Zambia. In accordance with section 609(k) of the Act, no candidate 
countries were newly selected to explore development of a concurrent 
compact program under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706).
    Belize: Belize offers MCC the opportunity to engage with a country 
that is committed to democratic governance but that faces rising 
poverty rates, significant challenges to economic growth, and 
vulnerability to external shocks. Belize meets the scorecard criteria, 
passing 13 of 20 indicators overall in FY 2022, with strong performance 
on both the Control of Corruption and Democratic Rights ``hard 
hurdles.'' By selecting Belize for a compact, MCC will support the 
government's efforts to strengthen economic growth to reduce poverty 
and address the development challenges facing the country.
    Zambia: Zambia's recent democratic transition and demonstrated 
commitment to pursuing critical economic and democratic governance 
reforms contributed to the Board's decision to select Zambia for a 
subsequent compact. Zambia passes the scorecard in FY 2022, passing 15 
of 20 indicators overall, including both the Control of Corruption and 
Democratic Rights ``hard hurdles.'' By selecting Zambia for a compact, 
MCC can support the government's efforts to make key economic and 
governance reforms, reduce poverty and strengthen economic growth, and 
address the country's pressing development challenges.
Countries Selected To Continue Compact Development
    Ten of the countries selected for compact assistance for FY 2022 
were previously selected for FY 2021. Indonesia, Lesotho, Malawi, 
Mozambique, Sierra Leone, and Timor-Leste were selected to continue 
developing ``domestic'' compacts. Benin, Burkina Faso, C[ocirc]te 
d'Ivoire, and Niger were selected to continue developing concurrent 
compacts for the purpose of regional integration. Selection of these 
countries for FY 2022 was based on an assessment of their policy 
performance since their prior selection.
    Although the Board reselected Benin, it endorsed MCC's 
determination to significantly reduce the portion of the planned 
regional investment that would be made in Benin through a concurrent 
compact due to Benin's multi-year decline in its commitment to the 
principles that underpin MCC's eligibility criteria, including the core 
principles of democratic governance.

[[Page 73006]]

Countries Selected To Receive Threshold Program Assistance
    The Board did not newly select any countries to receive threshold 
program assistance for FY 2022.
Countries Selected To Continue Developing Threshold Programs
    The Board selected Kenya and Kiribati to continue developing 
threshold programs. Selection of these countries for FY 2022 was based 
on their continued performance since their prior selection.

Ongoing Review of Partner Countries' Policy Performance

    The Board emphasized the need for all partner countries to maintain 
or improve their policy performance. If it is determined during compact 
implementation that a country has demonstrated a significant policy 
reversal, MCC can hold it accountable by applying MCC's Suspension and 
Termination Policy.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/who-we-select/suspension-or-termination.

[FR Doc. 2021-27955 Filed 12-21-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9211-03-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.