Pesticide Experimental Use Permit; Receipt of Application; Comment Request (December 2021), 72964-72965 [2021-27902]
Download as PDF
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
72964
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 244 / Thursday, December 23, 2021 / Notices
for a redress of grievances’’ 4 (a/k/a
‘‘lobbying’’). They can. Neither is it
aimed at suppressing or burdening the
protected speech of some limited subset
of trade associations. Rather, the central
question here is the same one present in
so many of the cases before an economic
regulator such as FERC, and that is the
less headline-grabbing, albeit critically
important, question: Who pays?
4. Relevant to the ‘‘who pays?’’
question is the type of business. A
business in a competitive market has a
First Amendment right to spend its own
money on speech, including lobbying
the legislators who pass laws that affect
it. These activities may be aimed at rentseeking through regulation or subsidies
(or seeking protection from other special
interests’ rent-seeking). James Madison
made it clear in The Federalist No. 10
that special interests (‘‘factions’’) would
always seek to gain advantage at the
expense of others through the political
process; but it was also Madison who
authored the First Amendment that
protected the freedom of all to pursue
their interests in the public arena, and
left it up to (hopefully) public-spirited
legislators—elected by the public—to
protect the public interest from the
special interests (including those
claiming to represent the public
interest) and their rent-seeking behavior.
5. Privately-owned businesses get
funds from two primary sources: (i)
Investors who put up capital; and (ii)
customers who purchase its goods and/
or services. A company that holds a
state-granted and state-protected
monopoly franchise is fundamentally
different, however, from a business in a
competitive market, not in its First
Amendment rights, but in how it can
pay for certain activities. Unlike the
business in a competitive market whose
customers voluntarily choose to
purchase its products over the products
of its competitors, the state-protected
monopoly gets its money from captive
customers who have no choice but to
purchase, for example, electrical power,
a vital necessity of modern life, from the
monopoly. The state-protected
monopoly is also guaranteed recovery of
its prudent costs incurred to serve the
public (hence the term ‘‘public service
company,’’ or ‘‘public service
corporation,’’ defined terms typically
applicable to public utilities under
many state laws).5 The question asked
herein, therefore, is which of its costs
should be charged to investors, who
have voluntarily invested in the
company, and which to captive
customers, who have no choice but to
4 U.S.
5 See,
Const. Adt. 1.
e.g., Va. Code § 56–1 et seq.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:50 Dec 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
purchase an essential product such as
electricity from it.6
6. Nothing keeps the monopoly from
spending money on First Amendment
protected speech, including lobbying
legislators and related public-relations
activities, but its investors should pay
those costs, not captive customers.7
That is the issue implicated by this NOI,
which seeks to better understand
whether costs permitted to be ‘‘above
the line’’ (chargeable to customers) and
those required to be ‘‘below the line’’
(chargeable to investors) for privatelyowned companies are being treated as
such on a transparent and consistent
basis.
7. While in a typical rate proceeding,
the opposing parties bear the initial
burden of challenging the accounting or
rate treatment of ‘‘above the line’’ or
‘‘below the line’’ expenses, under
section 205 of the Federal Power Act,
the ultimate burden has always been on
the regulated public utility to
demonstrate the justness and
reasonableness of its proposed rate.
Based on the record before us, and the
Commission audit staff’s own
experience, it may be that the
Commission, customers, and other
interested parties are not able to access
the information necessary to determine
whether the costs included in a
jurisdictional utility’s rates are
appropriately classified. The questions
raised in the NOI relate to issues
squarely within, and essential to, the
Commission’s jurisdictional
responsibilities to ensure just and
reasonable rates.
8. Let me also emphasize: It may well
be that the Commission’s existing rules,
regulations and precedent are sufficient
to ensure the just and reasonable
allocation of such costs, but it is worth
reviewing. As always with energy
regulation, the devil is in the details.
9. On a more specific topic, I also
support asking whether it is time to
clarify our regulations or further codify
what is now established primarily
through Commission precedent, i.e., not
allowing a monopoly to recover from
customers the costs of its contributions
and grants to charitable and civic
organizations. Giving away other
people’s money is not altruism.
For these reasons, I respectfully
concur.
Mark C. Christie,
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2021–27784 Filed 12–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
6 This analysis applies to privately-owned
companies, not publicly-owned or governmentowned providers or co-operatives.
7 Legal fees are a more complicated matter.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0082; FRL–9365–01–
OCSPP]
Pesticide Experimental Use Permit;
Receipt of Application; Comment
Request (December 2021)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces EPA’s
receipt of application 91868–EUP–R
from Biotalys NV, Buchtenstraat 11,
requesting an experimental use permit
(EUP) for the ASFBIOF01–02. The
Agency has determined that the permit
may be of regional and national
significance. Therefore, because of the
potential significance, EPA is seeking
comments on this application.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 24, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0082, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
open to visitors by appointment only.
The staff continues to provide remote
customer service via email, phone, and
webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and
docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Overstreet, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division (7511P), main
telephone number: (703) 305–7090,
email address: BPPDFRNotices@
epa.gov; Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 244 / Thursday, December 23, 2021 / Notices
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. Although this action may be
of particular interest to those persons
who conduct or sponsor research on
pesticides, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this
action.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to
achieve environmental justice, the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of any group, including minority and/or
low-income populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice
issues, the Agency seeks information on
any groups or segments of the
population who, as a result of their
location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or
disproportionately high and adverse
human health impacts or environmental
effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared
to the general population.
II. What action is the Agency taking?
Under section 5 of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136c, EPA can
allow manufacturers to field test
pesticides under development.
Manufacturers are required to obtain an
EUP before testing new pesticides or
new uses of pesticides if they conduct
experimental field tests on 10 acres or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:50 Dec 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
more of land or one acre or more of
water.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 172.11(a), the
Agency has determined that the
following EUP application may be of
regional and national significance, and
therefore is seeking public comment on
the EUP application:
Submitter: Biotalys NV, Buchtenstraat
11, 9051 Sint-Denijs-Westrem, Belgium.
Experimental Use Permit Number:
91868–EUP–R. Docket ID Number:
EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0685. Pesticide
Chemical: ASFBIOF01–02.
Summary of Request: Biofungicide for
treatment of plant diseases on grapes
and strawberry food crops. Quantity of
pesticide: 174 pounds. Total acreage:
235 acres treated over a two-year period.
Location of area of application:
California, Florida, Oregon, and
Washington states. Contact: BPPD.
Following the review of the
application and any comments and data
received in response to this solicitation,
EPA will decide whether to issue or
deny the EUP request, and if issued, the
conditions under which it is to be
conducted. Any issuance of an EUP will
be announced in the Federal Register.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: December 14, 2021.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and
Resources Management Division, Office of
Program Support.
[FR Doc. 2021–27902 Filed 12–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
72965
shown in the body of this document, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/where-sendcomments-epa-dockets.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/about-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090, email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov. The mailing
address for each contact person is:
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. As part of the mailing
address, include the contact person’s
name, division, and mail code. The
division to contact is listed at the end
of each application summary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0080; FRL–8795–06–
OCSPP]
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
Pesticide Product Registration;
this action if you are an agricultural
Receipt of Applications for New
producer, food manufacturer, or
Uses—December 2021
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
Agency (EPA).
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
ACTION: Notice.
provides a guide to help readers
SUMMARY: EPA has received applications determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
to register new uses for pesticide
products containing currently registered entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
active ingredients. Pursuant to the
• Animal production (NAICS code
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby 112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
providing notice of receipt and
311).
opportunity to comment on these
applications.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 24, 2022.
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
identified by the docket identification
the part or all of the information that
(ID) number and the File Symbol of the
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
EPA registration Number of interest as
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 244 (Thursday, December 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72964-72965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27902]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0082; FRL-9365-01-OCSPP]
Pesticide Experimental Use Permit; Receipt of Application;
Comment Request (December 2021)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's receipt of application 91868-EUP-R
from Biotalys NV, Buchtenstraat 11, requesting an experimental use
permit (EUP) for the ASFBIOF01-02. The Agency has determined that the
permit may be of regional and national significance. Therefore, because
of the potential significance, EPA is seeking comments on this
application.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 24, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0082, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is open to visitors by
appointment only. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Overstreet, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), main telephone number: (703)
305-7090, email address: [email protected]; Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email
address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 72965]]
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general. Although this
action may be of particular interest to those persons who conduct or
sponsor research on pesticides, the Agency has not attempted to
describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.
II. What action is the Agency taking?
Under section 5 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136c, EPA can allow manufacturers to
field test pesticides under development. Manufacturers are required to
obtain an EUP before testing new pesticides or new uses of pesticides
if they conduct experimental field tests on 10 acres or more of land or
one acre or more of water.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 172.11(a), the Agency has determined that the
following EUP application may be of regional and national significance,
and therefore is seeking public comment on the EUP application:
Submitter: Biotalys NV, Buchtenstraat 11, 9051 Sint-Denijs-Westrem,
Belgium. Experimental Use Permit Number: 91868-EUP-R. Docket ID Number:
EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0685. Pesticide Chemical: ASFBIOF01-02.
Summary of Request: Biofungicide for treatment of plant diseases on
grapes and strawberry food crops. Quantity of pesticide: 174 pounds.
Total acreage: 235 acres treated over a two-year period. Location of
area of application: California, Florida, Oregon, and Washington
states. Contact: BPPD.
Following the review of the application and any comments and data
received in response to this solicitation, EPA will decide whether to
issue or deny the EUP request, and if issued, the conditions under
which it is to be conducted. Any issuance of an EUP will be announced
in the Federal Register.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: December 14, 2021.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division,
Office of Program Support.
[FR Doc. 2021-27902 Filed 12-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P