Draft Environmental Assessment for the Commercial Disposal of Savannah River Site Contaminated Process Equipment, 72217-72220 [2021-27558]
Download as PDF
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 21, 2021 / Notices
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Survey of
Postgraduate Outcomes for the
Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation
Research Abroad (DDRA) Program.
OMB Control Number: 1840–0840.
Type of Review: Reinstatement with
change of a previously approved
collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: Private
Sector.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 157.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 40.
Abstract: The purpose of Section
102(b)(6) of the Mutual Educational and
Cultural Exchange Act of 1961
(Fulbright-Hays Act) is to promote and
develop modern foreign language
training and area studies throughout the
educational structure of the United
States. To help accomplish this
objective, fellowships are awarded
through U.S. institutions of higher
education to American doctoral
dissertation fellows enabling them to
conduct overseas research and enhance
their foreign language proficiency.
Under the Fulbright-Hays Doctoral
Dissertation Research Abroad (DDRA)
program, individual scholars apply
through eligible institutions for an
institutional grant to support the
research fellowship. These institutions
administer the program in cooperation
with the U.S. Department of Education
(US/ED). This information collection is
the tool that can gather the information
necessary to determine the performance
of the fellows and the program. Since
this collection is currently in a
discontinued status, this collection
package is a reinstatement with change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
Dated: December 16, 2021.
Kate Mullan,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance, Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2021–27633 Filed 12–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2021–SCC–0135]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
William D. Ford Direct Loan Program
General Forbearance Request
Federal Student Aid (FSA),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing an extension without change
of a currently approved collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before January
20, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for proposed
information collection requests should
be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Find this information
collection request by selecting
‘‘Department of Education’’ under
‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ then check
‘‘Only Show ICR for Public Comment’’
checkbox. Comments may also be sent
to ICDocketmgr@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Beth
Grebeldinger, 202–377–4018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72217
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: William D. Ford
Direct Loan Program General
Forbearance Request.
OMB Control Number: 1845–0031.
Type of Review: An extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals and Households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 2,188,770.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 175,102.
Abstract: Due to the effects of the
COVID–19 pandemic and the
suspension of the collection of loans,
the Department of Education is
requesting an extension without change
of the currently approved Direct Loan
General Forbearance Request form
information collection. The current form
includes the Direct Loan, FFEL, and
Perkins Loan programs making it easier
for borrowers to request this action.
There has been no change to the form,
the underlying regulations, or
anticipated usage.
Dated: December 16, 2021.
Kate Mullan,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2021–27578 Filed 12–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Draft Environmental Assessment for
the Commercial Disposal of Savannah
River Site Contaminated Process
Equipment
Office of Environmental
Management, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) announces the availability
of its Draft Environmental Assessment
for the Commercial Disposal of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
72218
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 21, 2021 / Notices
Savannah River Site Contaminated
Process Equipment (DOE/EA–2154)
(Draft Savannah River Site (SRS)
Contaminated Process Equipment
Environmental Assessment (EA)). The
Draft SRS Contaminated Process
Equipment EA evaluates the potential
impacts from a proposed action to
dispose of certain SRS contaminated
process equipment at a commercial lowlevel radioactive waste (LLW) disposal
facility outside of South Carolina,
licensed by either the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) or an
Agreement State pursuant to NRC’s
regulations for land disposal of
radioactive waste. The proposed
disposal of the SRS contaminated
process equipment is being analyzed
consistent with the Department’s
interpretation of the statutory term
‘‘high-level radioactive waste’’ (HLW) as
defined in the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended (AEA), and Nuclear
Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended
(NWPA).
DATES: The 45-day public comment
period extends from the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register through February 4, 2022, in
consideration of the end of calendar
year 2021 holidays. DOE will hold an
informational webinar on January 11,
2022, at 2 p.m. ET. See section V,
‘‘Public Participation,’’ for further
information on the public comment
process and the informational webinar.
ADDRESSES: Please direct written
comments or questions on the Draft SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA
using one of the following methods:
Email: SRSequipmentEA@em.doe.gov.
Please submit comments in MicrosoftTM
Word or PDF file format and avoid the
use of encryption.
Although DOE has routinely accepted
public comment submissions through a
variety of mechanisms, including postal
mail and hand delivery/courier, the
Department has found it necessary to
make temporary modifications to the
comment submission process in light of
the ongoing COVID–19 pandemic. For
this EA, DOE is suspending receipt of
public comments via postal mail and
hand delivery/courier. If a commenter
finds that this change poses an undue
hardship, please contact James Joyce at
(202) 586–5000 to discuss the need for
alternative arrangements.
The Draft SRS Contaminated Process
Equipment EA is available at: https://
www.energy.gov/em/downloads/draftenvironmental-assessment-commercialdisposal-srs-contaminated-processequipment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Joyce, U.S. Department of Energy,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
Office of Environmental Management, at
SRSequipmentEA@em.doe.gov or (202)
586–5000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
SRS occupies approximately 310
square miles primarily in Aiken and
Barnwell counties in South Carolina.
Over the years, a primary SRS mission
has been the production of special
radioactive isotopes to support national
defense programs, including
reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel and
target materials. More recently, the SRS
mission has emphasized waste
management, environmental restoration,
and the decontamination and
decommissioning of facilities that are no
longer needed for SRS’s traditional
defense activities. SRS generated large
quantities of liquid radioactive waste as
a result of reprocessing activities
associated with its nuclear materials
production mission.
The SRS process equipment has been
utilized during the on-site storage and
treatment of the reprocessing waste,
which results in the equipment’s
contamination. This Draft SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA
analyzes the potential environmental
impacts associated with the commercial
disposal of SRS process equipment
contaminated with reprocessing waste.
Portions of the Tank 28F salt sampling
drill string, glass bubblers, and glass
pumps are comprised of hazardous
components (e.g., lead) or are
contaminated with hazardous
constituents. Because there are no
permitted facilities at SRS for the
disposal of mixed LLW, this
contaminated process equipment cannot
be disposed of on-site.
The Tank 28F salt sampling drill
string was used to collect reprocessing
waste samples from the waste storage
tank in F-Area. The Tank 28F salt
sampling drill string consists of steel
piping measuring 2.25 inches in outer
diameter by 41 feet long, contaminated
with reprocessing waste (supernatant)
from Tank 28F. Contaminants include a
mixture of radionuclides (e.g., cesium137 and plutonium-238). The Tank 28F
drill string is currently stored in a large
container in a high-radiation area south
of the H-Area Tank Farm until a
disposal path can be established.
The glass bubblers are used to
increase the efficiency of the SRS
Defense Waste Processing Facility
(DWPF) melter operations, where highactivity tank waste is vitrified into glass
under high temperature. Each glass
bubbler is made up of a 3⁄4-inch Inconel
pipe, which is inserted into the DWPF
melter and through which an inert gas
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is introduced to increase melter
efficiency. During operations,
approximately three feet of the lower
portion of the bubbler is submerged in
the melt pool and becomes
contaminated with various
radionuclides (e.g., cesium-137 and
plutonium-238). The total length of each
complete bubbler assembly is between
8.8 feet and 9.4 feet, as there are four
design lengths based on the bubbler
location in the melter. SRS currently has
approximately 60 contaminated
bubblers in storage and is expected to
generate four contaminated glass
bubblers every six months until DWPF
operations are completed in the 2034
timeframe. Based on the glass bubbler
replacement rate of eight bubblers
annually, DOE projects a need to
dispose of approximately 172 bubblers
by the forecasted end of DWPF
operations. The bubblers are currently
stored inside the DWPF canyon
building.
The glass pumps were previously
used to support melter efficiency but
have been replaced by the glass bubblers
and therefore are no longer generated at
SRS. Each glass pump includes a
section of Inconel pipe, measuring
approximately 3.625 inches in outer
diameter; only the lower portion (two
feet) of which was in the melt pool and
contains contaminated glass. The
overall glass pump is about 11 feet long.
There are approximately 10 glass pumps
in storage at SRS requiring disposal.
Similar to the glass bubblers, the glass
pumps are currently stored inside the
DWPF canyon building.
This Draft SRS Contaminated Process
Equipment EA will be the second
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) analysis proposing to apply the
high-level radioactive waste
interpretation (HLWI) to a particular
waste stream. In August 2020, DOE
completed its first NEPA analysis
(Commercial Disposal of DWPF Recycle
Wastewater Environmental Assessment,
DOE/EA–2115) analyzing a proposed
application of the HLWI.1 This was
implemented in accordance with the
June 10, 2019, Supplemental Notice
Concerning U.S. Department of Energy
Interpretation of High-Level Radioactive
Waste (Supplemental Notice), 84 FR
26835, in which DOE provided its
interpretation of the statutory term HLW
as defined in the AEA 2 and NWPA.3
1 NEPA documents and technical documents for
the commercial disposal of DWPF recycle
wastewater from SRS under the HLWI can be found
at: https://www.energy.gov/em/program-scope/highlevel-radioactive-waste-hlw-interpretation.
2 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.
3 42 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 21, 2021 / Notices
In early 2021, various stakeholders
submitted both supportive and nonsupportive letters to the Secretary of
Energy regarding the HLWI. The
Secretary is committed to implementing
the Department’s environmental
cleanup programs in a manner that is
consistent with the law and that makes
evidence-based decisions guided by the
best available science and data. The
Department assessed the HLWI in light
of this commitment; please see separate
Federal Register Notice, Assessment of
Department of Energy’s Interpretation of
the Definition of High-Level Radioactive
Waste, which is being published in the
Federal Register concurrently with this
notice, documenting the Department’s
assessment and affirming the
Department’s interpretation of the
statutory term ‘‘high-level radioactive
waste’’ as defined in the AEA and the
NWPA.
II. Purpose and Need for Action
There is no current disposal pathway
for the SRS contaminated process
equipment. The purpose and need for
DOE’s action is to identify a disposal
pathway for the SRS contaminated
process equipment to mitigate on-site
storage constraints, improve worker
safety, and support accelerated
completion of the environmental
cleanup mission at SRS.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
III. Proposed Action and Alternatives
Under the proposed action, DOE
would dispose of the SRS contaminated
process equipment (Tank 28F salt
sampling drill string, glass bubblers, and
glass pumps) at a commercial LLW
disposal facility outside of South
Carolina licensed by either the NRC or
an Agreement State under 10 CFR part
61. Prior to a disposal decision, DOE
would characterize the contaminated
process equipment to verify with the
licensed offsite commercial LLW
disposal facility whether the waste
meets DOE’s HLWI Criterion 1 for
disposal as non-HLW, in accordance
with DOE Manual 435.1–1, Radioactive
Waste Management Manual. DOE
would demonstrate compliance with the
waste acceptance criteria and all other
requirements of the disposal facility,
including any applicable regulatory
requirements for management of the
waste prior to disposal and applicable
U.S. Department of Transportation and
NRC requirements for packaging and
transportation from SRS to the
commercial disposal facility. DOE has
identified two reasonable action
alternatives for the proposed action:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
• Alternative 1—If determined to be
Class B or Class C LLW,4 DOE would
stabilize and package the waste at SRS
and ship the waste packages to Waste
Control Specialists LLC (WCS) in
Andrews County, Texas, for disposal.5
Implementation would be dependent
upon the waste meeting the facility’s
waste acceptance criteria, among other
requirements.
• Alternative 2—If determined to be
Class A LLW, DOE would stabilize and
package the waste at SRS and ship the
waste packages to either
EnergySolutions 6 in Clive, Utah, or
WCS in Andrews County, Texas, for
disposal. Implementation would be
dependent upon the waste meeting the
facility’s waste acceptance criteria,
among other requirements.
The EA also evaluates a No-Action
Alternative under which the
contaminated process equipment would
remain in storage at SRS until another
disposal path was identified.
IV. NEPA Process
Comments on the Draft SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA
received during the public comment
period will be considered during
preparation of the Final SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA.
Following the public comment period—
and based on the Final SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA
and consideration of all comments
received—DOE will either issue a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) or announce its intent to
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS). If DOE determines that
a FONSI is appropriate, both the Final
EA and FONSI will be made available
to the public. If DOE determines that an
EIS is needed, either during preparation
of the Final SRS Contaminated Process
Equipment EA or after completing the
EA, DOE would issue in the Federal
Register a Notice of Intent to prepare an
EIS.
Consultations with other agencies
(e.g., State Historic Preservation Officer,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) were not
required or undertaken in connection
4 In its 10 CFR part 61 regulations, NRC has
identified classes of LLW—Class A, B, or C—for
which near-surface disposal is safe for public health
and the environment. This waste classification
regime is based on the concentration levels of a
combination of specified short-lived and long-lived
radionuclides in a waste stream, with Class C LLW
having the highest concentration levels.
5 Because the SRS contaminated process
equipment would most likely result in Class B or
Class C LLW, this has been identified as the first
alternative.
6 EnergySolutions is currently licensed to only
dispose of Class A LLW and mixed LLW; WCS is
licensed to dispose of Class A, Class B, and Class
C LLW and mixed LLW.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72219
with the Draft SRS Contaminated
Process Equipment EA because the
Proposed Action would not impact
cultural resources, historic properties,
or threatened or endangered species.
The following regulatory agencies were
notified of the preparation of this Draft
SRS Contaminated Process Equipment
EA: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency; NRC; Idaho Department of
Environmental Quality; Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection;
New York State Energy Research and
Development Authority; South Carolina
Department of Health and
Environmental Control; Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality;
Utah Department of Environmental
Quality; and Washington State
Department of Ecology.
V. Public Participation
Submission of Public Comments: DOE
will accept comments on the Draft SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA no
later than the date provided in the DATES
section at the beginning of this notice.
Interested parties may submit comments
using any of the methods described in
the ADDRESSES section at the beginning
of this notice. Because your comments
will be made public, you are solely
responsible for ensuring that your
comments do not include any
Confidential Business Information that
you or a third party may not wish to be
posted.
Confidential Business Information.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person
submitting information that he or she
believes to be confidential and exempt
by law from public disclosure should
submit via email two well-marked
copies: One copy of the document
marked confidential including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked
non-confidential with the information
believed to be confidential deleted. It is
DOE’s policy that all comments will be
included in the public docket, without
change and as received, including any
personal information provided in the
comments (except information deemed
to be exempt from public disclosure).
Informational Webinar: The time and
date of the webinar are listed in the
DATES section at the beginning of this
notice. This webinar, which will
provide an overview of the Draft SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA,
can be accessed at: https://
doe.webex.com/doe/
j.php?MTID=m60ab8e647f
04ce33ab25e3cf7e5b60ea.
No registration is required.
Participants are responsible for ensuring
their systems are compatible with the
webinar software.
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
72220
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 21, 2021 / Notices
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on December 15,
2021, by John A. Mullis II, Acting
Associate Principal Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Regulatory and Policy
Affairs, Office of Environmental
Management, pursuant to delegated
authority from the Secretary of Energy.
This document with the original
signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only,
and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register
Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in
electronic format for publication, as an
official document of the Department of
Energy. This administrative process in
no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed at Washington, DC, on December
16, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021–27558 Filed 12–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Assessment of Department of Energy’s
Interpretation of the Definition of HighLevel Radioactive Waste
Office of Environmental
Management, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) affirms its interpretation
of the statutory term ‘‘high-level
radioactive waste’’ (HLW) as defined in
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (AEA), and the Nuclear Waste
Policy Act of 1982, as amended
(NWPA). The HLW interpretation
(HLWI) is consistent with the law, the
best available science and data, and the
recommendations of the Blue Ribbon
Commission on America’s Nuclear
Future. In developing the HLWI, the
views of members of the public and the
scientific community were considered.
ADDRESSES: This Federal Register Notice
(FRN) and other documents relevant to
DOE’s HLWI are available on the
Department’s website at: https://
www.energy.gov/em/program-scope/
high-level-radioactive-waste-hlwinterpretation.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Joyce at james.joyce@em.doe.gov
or (202) 586–5000.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 20, 2021
The
Secretary of Energy is committed to
implementing the Department’s
environmental cleanup programs in a
manner that is consistent with the law
and that makes evidence-based
decisions guided by the best available
science and data. In early 2021, various
stakeholders submitted both supportive
and non-supportive letters to the
Secretary of Energy regarding the HLWI.
The Department assessed the HLWI in
light of this commitment. This FRN
documents the results of that
assessment.
As explained in this FRN, DOE
affirms its interpretation of the statutory
term ‘‘high-level radioactive waste’’
(HLW) as defined in the AEA 1 and
NWPA.2 As DOE stated in the
Supplemental Notice Concerning U.S.
Department of Energy Interpretation of
High-Level Radioactive Waste, 84 FR
26835 (June 10, 2019, FRN)
(Supplemental Notice), and the HighLevel Radioactive Waste Interpretation
Limited Change to DOE Manual 435.1–
1, Radioactive Waste Management
Manual and Administrative Change to
DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste
Management, 86 FR 5173 (January 19,
2021, FRN), DOE interprets the statutory
term ‘‘high-level radioactive waste’’ to
mean that not all wastes from the
reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel
(reprocessing wastes) are HLW. DOE
interprets the statutory term such that
some reprocessing wastes may be
classified as not HLW (non-HLW) and
may be safely disposed of in accordance
with its radiological characteristics.
DOE confirms that the HLWI is
consistent with the law, the best
available science and data, and the
recommendations of the Blue Ribbon
Commission on America’s Nuclear
Future. DOE further affirms that the
views of the public and the scientific
community were considered in
developing the HLWI.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 256001
I. Background
Building on the recommendations of
the Blue Ribbon Commission on
America’s Nuclear Future issued in
2012,3 the development of the HLWI
began in 2016 at the direction of then
Secretary Moniz. The HLWI was
finalized in 2019, and was successfully
1 42
U.S.C. 2011 et seq.
U.S.C. 10101 et seq.
3 This commission was formed in 2010 by thenSecretary of Energy Chu at the request of President
Obama to conduct a comprehensive review of
policies for managing the back end of the nuclear
fuel cycle and recommend a new strategy. https://
www.energy.gov/ne/downloads/blue-ribboncommission-americas-nuclear-future-reportsecretary-energy.
2 42
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
implemented on a single waste stream
in 2020.
The Department sought public
comments on its HLWI through its
Request for Public Comment on the U.S.
Department of Energy Interpretation of
High-Level Radioactive Waste, 83 FR
50909 (October 10, 2018, FRN). The 90day public comment period, including a
30-day extension to submit comments,
invited public input in order to better
understand stakeholder perspectives,
and sought to increase transparency and
enhance public understanding of DOE’s
views of its legal authority. DOE
received a total of 5,555 comments,
roughly 360 of which were distinct
comments, from a variety of
stakeholders: Members of the public;
tribal nations; members of Congress;
numerous state and local governments;
and one federal agency, the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC). All
input was important to the process and
all comments were carefully and fully
considered by DOE.
In June 2019, after careful
consideration of all comments received
on the October 2018 FRN, DOE issued
the Supplemental Notice. The
Supplemental Notice provided
additional explanation of DOE’s
interpretation as informed by public
review and comment and further
consideration by DOE following the
October 2018 FRN. The Supplemental
Notice also provided responses to
significant and recurring comments
received through the public comment
process. In its Supplemental Notice,
DOE explained its interpretation of the
term HLW, as defined in the AEA and
NWPA.4 DOE has the long-standing
authority and responsibility under the
AEA to ensure that all DOE radioactive
waste—including reprocessing waste—
is managed and disposed of in a safe
manner. The AEA and NWPA define
HLW as:
(A) The highly radioactive material
resulting from the reprocessing of spent
nuclear fuel, including liquid waste
produced directly in reprocessing and
any solid material derived from such
liquid waste that contains fission
products in sufficient concentrations;
and
(B) Other highly radioactive material
that the [NRC], consistent with existing
law, determines by rule requires
permanent isolation.
42 U.S.C. 10101(12); see 42 U.S.C.
2014(dd). In Paragraph A of 42 U.S.C.
10101(12), Congress limited the
designation of HLW to those materials
that are ‘‘highly radioactive.’’ This
4 The AEA and NWPA include the same
definition of HLW.
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72217-72220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27558]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Draft Environmental Assessment for the Commercial Disposal of
Savannah River Site Contaminated Process Equipment
AGENCY: Office of Environmental Management, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability
of its Draft Environmental Assessment for the Commercial Disposal of
[[Page 72218]]
Savannah River Site Contaminated Process Equipment (DOE/EA-2154) (Draft
Savannah River Site (SRS) Contaminated Process Equipment Environmental
Assessment (EA)). The Draft SRS Contaminated Process Equipment EA
evaluates the potential impacts from a proposed action to dispose of
certain SRS contaminated process equipment at a commercial low-level
radioactive waste (LLW) disposal facility outside of South Carolina,
licensed by either the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) or an
Agreement State pursuant to NRC's regulations for land disposal of
radioactive waste. The proposed disposal of the SRS contaminated
process equipment is being analyzed consistent with the Department's
interpretation of the statutory term ``high-level radioactive waste''
(HLW) as defined in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA),
and Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended (NWPA).
DATES: The 45-day public comment period extends from the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register through February 4,
2022, in consideration of the end of calendar year 2021 holidays. DOE
will hold an informational webinar on January 11, 2022, at 2 p.m. ET.
See section V, ``Public Participation,'' for further information on the
public comment process and the informational webinar.
ADDRESSES: Please direct written comments or questions on the Draft SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA using one of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. Please submit comments in
Microsoft\TM\ Word or PDF file format and avoid the use of encryption.
Although DOE has routinely accepted public comment submissions
through a variety of mechanisms, including postal mail and hand
delivery/courier, the Department has found it necessary to make
temporary modifications to the comment submission process in light of
the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. For this EA, DOE is suspending receipt
of public comments via postal mail and hand delivery/courier. If a
commenter finds that this change poses an undue hardship, please
contact James Joyce at (202) 586-5000 to discuss the need for
alternative arrangements.
The Draft SRS Contaminated Process Equipment EA is available at:
https://www.energy.gov/em/downloads/draft-environmental-assessment-commercial-disposal-srs-contaminated-process-equipment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Joyce, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Environmental Management, at
[email protected] or (202) 586-5000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
SRS occupies approximately 310 square miles primarily in Aiken and
Barnwell counties in South Carolina. Over the years, a primary SRS
mission has been the production of special radioactive isotopes to
support national defense programs, including reprocessing of spent
nuclear fuel and target materials. More recently, the SRS mission has
emphasized waste management, environmental restoration, and the
decontamination and decommissioning of facilities that are no longer
needed for SRS's traditional defense activities. SRS generated large
quantities of liquid radioactive waste as a result of reprocessing
activities associated with its nuclear materials production mission.
The SRS process equipment has been utilized during the on-site
storage and treatment of the reprocessing waste, which results in the
equipment's contamination. This Draft SRS Contaminated Process
Equipment EA analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated
with the commercial disposal of SRS process equipment contaminated with
reprocessing waste. Portions of the Tank 28F salt sampling drill
string, glass bubblers, and glass pumps are comprised of hazardous
components (e.g., lead) or are contaminated with hazardous
constituents. Because there are no permitted facilities at SRS for the
disposal of mixed LLW, this contaminated process equipment cannot be
disposed of on-site.
The Tank 28F salt sampling drill string was used to collect
reprocessing waste samples from the waste storage tank in F-Area. The
Tank 28F salt sampling drill string consists of steel piping measuring
2.25 inches in outer diameter by 41 feet long, contaminated with
reprocessing waste (supernatant) from Tank 28F. Contaminants include a
mixture of radionuclides (e.g., cesium-137 and plutonium-238). The Tank
28F drill string is currently stored in a large container in a high-
radiation area south of the H-Area Tank Farm until a disposal path can
be established.
The glass bubblers are used to increase the efficiency of the SRS
Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) melter operations, where high-
activity tank waste is vitrified into glass under high temperature.
Each glass bubbler is made up of a \3/4\-inch Inconel pipe, which is
inserted into the DWPF melter and through which an inert gas is
introduced to increase melter efficiency. During operations,
approximately three feet of the lower portion of the bubbler is
submerged in the melt pool and becomes contaminated with various
radionuclides (e.g., cesium-137 and plutonium-238). The total length of
each complete bubbler assembly is between 8.8 feet and 9.4 feet, as
there are four design lengths based on the bubbler location in the
melter. SRS currently has approximately 60 contaminated bubblers in
storage and is expected to generate four contaminated glass bubblers
every six months until DWPF operations are completed in the 2034
timeframe. Based on the glass bubbler replacement rate of eight
bubblers annually, DOE projects a need to dispose of approximately 172
bubblers by the forecasted end of DWPF operations. The bubblers are
currently stored inside the DWPF canyon building.
The glass pumps were previously used to support melter efficiency
but have been replaced by the glass bubblers and therefore are no
longer generated at SRS. Each glass pump includes a section of Inconel
pipe, measuring approximately 3.625 inches in outer diameter; only the
lower portion (two feet) of which was in the melt pool and contains
contaminated glass. The overall glass pump is about 11 feet long. There
are approximately 10 glass pumps in storage at SRS requiring disposal.
Similar to the glass bubblers, the glass pumps are currently stored
inside the DWPF canyon building.
This Draft SRS Contaminated Process Equipment EA will be the second
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis proposing to apply
the high-level radioactive waste interpretation (HLWI) to a particular
waste stream. In August 2020, DOE completed its first NEPA analysis
(Commercial Disposal of DWPF Recycle Wastewater Environmental
Assessment, DOE/EA-2115) analyzing a proposed application of the
HLWI.\1\ This was implemented in accordance with the June 10, 2019,
Supplemental Notice Concerning U.S. Department of Energy Interpretation
of High-Level Radioactive Waste (Supplemental Notice), 84 FR 26835, in
which DOE provided its interpretation of the statutory term HLW as
defined in the AEA \2\ and NWPA.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NEPA documents and technical documents for the commercial
disposal of DWPF recycle wastewater from SRS under the HLWI can be
found at: https://www.energy.gov/em/program-scope/high-level-radioactive-waste-hlw-interpretation.
\2\ 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.
\3\ 42 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 72219]]
In early 2021, various stakeholders submitted both supportive and
non-supportive letters to the Secretary of Energy regarding the HLWI.
The Secretary is committed to implementing the Department's
environmental cleanup programs in a manner that is consistent with the
law and that makes evidence-based decisions guided by the best
available science and data. The Department assessed the HLWI in light
of this commitment; please see separate Federal Register Notice,
Assessment of Department of Energy's Interpretation of the Definition
of High-Level Radioactive Waste, which is being published in the
Federal Register concurrently with this notice, documenting the
Department's assessment and affirming the Department's interpretation
of the statutory term ``high-level radioactive waste'' as defined in
the AEA and the NWPA.
II. Purpose and Need for Action
There is no current disposal pathway for the SRS contaminated
process equipment. The purpose and need for DOE's action is to identify
a disposal pathway for the SRS contaminated process equipment to
mitigate on-site storage constraints, improve worker safety, and
support accelerated completion of the environmental cleanup mission at
SRS.
III. Proposed Action and Alternatives
Under the proposed action, DOE would dispose of the SRS
contaminated process equipment (Tank 28F salt sampling drill string,
glass bubblers, and glass pumps) at a commercial LLW disposal facility
outside of South Carolina licensed by either the NRC or an Agreement
State under 10 CFR part 61. Prior to a disposal decision, DOE would
characterize the contaminated process equipment to verify with the
licensed offsite commercial LLW disposal facility whether the waste
meets DOE's HLWI Criterion 1 for disposal as non-HLW, in accordance
with DOE Manual 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual. DOE would
demonstrate compliance with the waste acceptance criteria and all other
requirements of the disposal facility, including any applicable
regulatory requirements for management of the waste prior to disposal
and applicable U.S. Department of Transportation and NRC requirements
for packaging and transportation from SRS to the commercial disposal
facility. DOE has identified two reasonable action alternatives for the
proposed action:
Alternative 1--If determined to be Class B or Class C
LLW,\4\ DOE would stabilize and package the waste at SRS and ship the
waste packages to Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS) in Andrews
County, Texas, for disposal.\5\ Implementation would be dependent upon
the waste meeting the facility's waste acceptance criteria, among other
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ In its 10 CFR part 61 regulations, NRC has identified
classes of LLW--Class A, B, or C--for which near-surface disposal is
safe for public health and the environment. This waste
classification regime is based on the concentration levels of a
combination of specified short-lived and long-lived radionuclides in
a waste stream, with Class C LLW having the highest concentration
levels.
\5\ Because the SRS contaminated process equipment would most
likely result in Class B or Class C LLW, this has been identified as
the first alternative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative 2--If determined to be Class A LLW, DOE would
stabilize and package the waste at SRS and ship the waste packages to
either EnergySolutions \6\ in Clive, Utah, or WCS in Andrews County,
Texas, for disposal. Implementation would be dependent upon the waste
meeting the facility's waste acceptance criteria, among other
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ EnergySolutions is currently licensed to only dispose of
Class A LLW and mixed LLW; WCS is licensed to dispose of Class A,
Class B, and Class C LLW and mixed LLW.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EA also evaluates a No-Action Alternative under which the
contaminated process equipment would remain in storage at SRS until
another disposal path was identified.
IV. NEPA Process
Comments on the Draft SRS Contaminated Process Equipment EA
received during the public comment period will be considered during
preparation of the Final SRS Contaminated Process Equipment EA.
Following the public comment period--and based on the Final SRS
Contaminated Process Equipment EA and consideration of all comments
received--DOE will either issue a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) or announce its intent to prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS). If DOE determines that a FONSI is appropriate, both
the Final EA and FONSI will be made available to the public. If DOE
determines that an EIS is needed, either during preparation of the
Final SRS Contaminated Process Equipment EA or after completing the EA,
DOE would issue in the Federal Register a Notice of Intent to prepare
an EIS.
Consultations with other agencies (e.g., State Historic
Preservation Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) were not required
or undertaken in connection with the Draft SRS Contaminated Process
Equipment EA because the Proposed Action would not impact cultural
resources, historic properties, or threatened or endangered species.
The following regulatory agencies were notified of the preparation of
this Draft SRS Contaminated Process Equipment EA: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency; NRC; Idaho Department of Environmental Quality;
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; New York State Energy
Research and Development Authority; South Carolina Department of Health
and Environmental Control; Texas Commission on Environmental Quality;
Utah Department of Environmental Quality; and Washington State
Department of Ecology.
V. Public Participation
Submission of Public Comments: DOE will accept comments on the
Draft SRS Contaminated Process Equipment EA no later than the date
provided in the DATES section at the beginning of this notice.
Interested parties may submit comments using any of the methods
described in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this notice.
Because your comments will be made public, you are solely responsible
for ensuring that your comments do not include any Confidential
Business Information that you or a third party may not wish to be
posted.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked
confidential including all the information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked non-confidential with the
information believed to be confidential deleted. It is DOE's policy
that all comments will be included in the public docket, without change
and as received, including any personal information provided in the
comments (except information deemed to be exempt from public
disclosure).
Informational Webinar: The time and date of the webinar are listed
in the DATES section at the beginning of this notice. This webinar,
which will provide an overview of the Draft SRS Contaminated Process
Equipment EA, can be accessed at: https://doe.webex.com/doe/j.php?MTID=m60ab8e647f04ce33ab25e3cf7e5b60ea.
No registration is required. Participants are responsible for
ensuring their systems are compatible with the webinar software.
[[Page 72220]]
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on December
15, 2021, by John A. Mullis II, Acting Associate Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Regulatory and Policy Affairs, Office of
Environmental Management, pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. This document with the original signature and date
is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in
compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as
an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative
process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed at Washington, DC, on December 16, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-27558 Filed 12-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P