Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Increase the Threshold of the Primary Peanut-Producing States and Adjustment of Membership, 72148-72151 [2021-27513]
Download as PDF
72148
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) Form, type, number of units.
(10) List of repacks and
remanufactures during the reporting
period including:
(i) Form, type, and number of units of
source products; and
(ii) Form, type, and number of units
of end products.
(b) The amount of inventory for each
product over 5 years old shall be
reported annually on the sales and
inventory report for the reporting period
ending May 31. Product age is based on
the crop year in which the current
product was processed or
remanufactured.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–27579 Filed 12–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Document Number AMS–SC–20–0100]
Peanut Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Increase the
Threshold of the Primary PeanutProducing States and Adjustment of
Membership
Agricultural Marketing Service,
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule changes the
threshold for defining primary peanutproducing states as states that maintain
a 3-year average production of at least
20,000 tons of peanuts, instead of
10,000 tons of peanuts as currently
prescribed in the Peanut Promotion,
Research, and Information Order
(Order). The Order is administered by
the National Peanut Board (Board) with
oversight by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA). As a result of
increasing the threshold, the Board’s
membership will decrease from 13 to 12
members and their respective alternates.
This change will contribute to effective
administration of the program.
DATES: Effective January 20, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victoria M. Carpenter, Marketing
Specialist, Mid Atlantic Branch, Market
Development Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA, Stop 0244, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Room 1406–
S, Washington, DC 20250–0244;
Telephone: (202) 720–6930; or Email:
VictoriaM.Carpenter@usda.gov.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
17:14 Dec 20, 2021
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review.
Executive Order 13175
7 CFR Part 1216
VerDate Sep<11>2014
This rule
is issued under the Order (7 CFR part
1216). The Order is authorized under
the Commodity Promotion, Research,
and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act)
(7 U.S.C. 7411–7425).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 256001
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has assessed
the impact of this rule on Indian tribes
and determined that this rule will not
have tribal implications that require
consultation under Executive Order
13175. AMS hosts a quarterly
teleconference with tribal leaders where
matters of mutual interest regarding the
marketing of agricultural products are
discussed. Information about changes to
regulations were shared during a recent
quarterly call, and tribal leaders were
informed about the revisions to the
regulation and had the opportunity to
submit comments. AMS will continue to
work with the USDA Office of Tribal
Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided as needed with
regards to this change to the Order.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. It is not intended to have
retroactive effect. Section 524 of the
1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides that
it shall not affect or preempt any other
Federal or State law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an
agricultural commodity.
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7
U.S.C. 7418), a person subject to an
order may file a written petition with
USDA stating that an order, any
provision of an order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with an order, is
not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an
order or an exemption from an order.
Any petition filed challenging an order,
any provision of an order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
an order, shall be filed within two years
after the effective date of an order,
provision, or obligation subject to
challenge in the petition. The petitioner
will have the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. Thereafter, USDA will
issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996
Act provides that the district court of
the United States for any district in
which the petitioner resides or conducts
business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if
the petitioner files a complaint for that
purpose not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of USDA’s final ruling.
Background
This rule will increase the threshold
for defining primary peanut-producing
states as states that maintain a 3-year
average production of at least 20,000
tons of peanuts, instead of 10,000 tons
of peanuts as currently prescribed in the
Order. This will help ensure that the
Board reflects the peanut production in
the United States. The Order is
administered by the Board with
oversight by USDA.
The Order became effective on July
30, 1999. Under the Order, the Board
administers a nationally coordinated
program of promotion, research and
information designed to strengthen the
position of peanuts in the marketplace
and to develop, maintain, and expand
the demand for peanuts in the United
States. Under the program, assessments
are levied on all farmers’ stock peanuts
sold at a rate of $3.55 per ton for
Segregation 1 peanuts, and $1.25 per ton
for Segregation 2 peanuts and 3 peanuts,
as those terms are defined in 7 CFR
996.13(b) through (d). Assessments are
remitted to the Board by handlers and,
for peanuts under loan, by the
Commodity Credit Corporation.
The Order defines the terms ‘‘minor
peanut-producing states’’ and ‘‘primary
peanut-producing states’’ for purposes
of Board representation and voting at
meetings. According to USDA, FederalState Inspection Service, National
Peanut Tonnage Reports, there are 13
peanut-producing states, which include:
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New
Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma,
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia.
Section 1216.21 currently defines
primary peanut-producing states as
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico,
North Carolina, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, Texas, and Virginia. These
states must maintain a 3-year average
production of at least 10,000 tons of
peanuts to meet the current definition.
All other peanut-producing states are
defined as minor peanut-producing
states in § 1216.15 and are represented
by one member and one alternate on the
Board—currently only Louisiana meets
this definition.
With the growth in farm size, there
are fewer and larger peanut producers
than when the Order was promulgated
in 1999. As stated above, currently,
there is only one state, Louisiana, that
represents the minor peanut-producing
states, which is the at-large position on
the Board. This makes it difficult to get
adequate numbers of nominees to fill
both member and alternate member
seats on the Board. By increasing the
threshold for defining primary peanutproducing states to states that maintain
a 3-year average production of at least
20,000 tons instead of 10,000 tons of
peanuts as currently prescribed, this
action will increase the candidate pool
for at-large member seats on the Board.
Pursuant to § 1216.87, amendments to
the Order may be proposed from time to
time by the Board or by any interested
person affected by provisions of the
1996 Act, including the Secretary of
Agriculture.
For several years, the Board has been
concerned about having enough
nominees to fill vacant seats and was
hopeful that the situation would
improve. The Board staff has actively
recruited candidates to be considered
for nomination from multiple primary
peanut-producing states and the at-large
state, sometimes with little success. Due
to an alternate member vacancy for New
Mexico and difficulty finding producers
to serve, the Board determined it was
time to increase the 3-year average.
The Board discussed increasing the
threshold with the industry to explain
the situation, and determined that
increasing the threshold for defining
primary peanut-producing states was a
good way to give the peanut producing
states an opportunity to be nominated
for a member or alternate seat on the
Board.
Board Recommendation
The Board met to discuss methods to
increase the pool of candidates for
representation of the minor peanutproducing states to serve on the Board.
At the time of the Board’s formation in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Dec 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
July 1999 (64 FR 41252), peanut farms
were smaller, and therefore, there were
many more producers eligible to be
nominated to serve on the Board. In
April 1999, USDA reported there were
approximately 25,000 peanut producers
(64 FR 80107). Based on the Board’s
records, for the 2018 production crop
year, there were 8,126 peanut producers
and for the 2019 crop year, there were
7,200 peanut producers.
Currently, in minor peanut-producing
states the pool of candidates is very
small, with Louisiana being the only
state in this category. The Board has had
difficulty in gathering the required two
nominees for each open position for
submission to the Secretary of
Agriculture.
The Board has been concerned about
this issue for several years and was
hopeful that the situation would
improve. For approximately 10 years,
the Board’s management has actively
recruited candidates to be considered
for nomination from multiple primary
and minor peanut-producing states to
fill seats on the Board. In the 2020
submission to the Secretary for
appointments to fill member and
alternate seats for New Mexico, only
two nominees were submitted for
consideration instead of four. Therefore,
only the member seat was filled, and the
alternate seat remains vacant. In
addition, since there is currently only
one state (Louisiana) representing minor
peanut-producing states, it is often
difficult to get a sufficient number of
nominees to fill member and alternate
positions as well. These nominees are
comprised of producers of all sizes
including small producers.
In 1999, the Board was comprised of
10 members and their alternates. The
Board’s representation for primary
peanut-producing states were Alabama,
Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Texas, and Virginia and minor peanutproducing states were represented by a
Louisiana member and an Arizona
alternate member. Over the years, there
have been three adjustments of
membership, which increased the size
of the Board’s membership. On July 9,
2008, the Board increased its
membership from 10 to 11 when it
added Mississippi as a primary peanutproducing state (73 FR 39214). On
March 21, 2014, the Board increased its
membership a second time from 11 to
12 when it added Arkansas as a primary
peanut-producing state (79 FR 15636).
The most recent change in the Board’s
membership was the addition of
Missouri, which was published on
March 23, 2020 (85 FR 16229). That
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72149
addition increased the membership
from 12 to 13.
For the 2019 production year,
computations based on Federal State
Inspection Service data show that
Georgia was the largest producer, with
49.8 percent followed by Florida (10.7
percent), Alabama (9.4 percent), Texas
(8.7 percent), North Carolina (8.1
percent), South Carolina (4.1 percent),
Arkansas (3.1 percent), Virginia (2.0
percent), Mississippi (1.4 percent),
Missouri (1.2 percent), Oklahoma (1.0
percent), and New Mexico (0.3 percent).
Currently, these 12 states are considered
primary peanut-producing states and
they each have a member, with their
alternate, seated on the Board. All other
states (minor peanut-producing states)
that produce peanuts are represented by
the at-large member.
There is currently only one minor
peanut-producing state (Louisiana)
representing ‘‘at-large’’ seats. That
minor peanut-producing state has only
five producers producing peanuts in
that state. Increasing the threshold from
10,000 tons to 20,000 tons will cause the
state of New Mexico to become a minor
peanut-producing state instead of a
primary peanut-producing state. This
change will increase the pool of
candidates eligible to represent minor
peanut-producing states as the at-large
member and alternate. Minor peanutproducing states will be represented by
Louisiana and New Mexico. This rule
will increase the threshold for defining
primary peanut-producing states as
states that maintain a 3-year average
production of at least 20,000 tons of
peanuts instead of 10,000 tons of
peanuts, an increase of 10,000 tons.
The intent of the Order is to allow
peanut farmers to oversee a peanut
research, marketing, and promotion
organization to improve their economic
condition. To be successful, there must
be an adequate pool of interested,
qualified producers to serve on the
Board. The Board voted unanimously on
December 3, 2020, and February 3,
2021, to raise the threshold for primary
peanut-producing states to those that
maintain a 3-year average production of
at least 20,000 tons of peanuts. This rule
will cause the state of New Mexico to
become a minor peanut-producing state
instead of a primary peanut-producing
state, since its production will be below
the proposed 20,000-ton threshold.
Minor peanut-producing states will be
represented by Louisiana and New
Mexico. The Board recommended that
the change take place by January 1,
2022, to give New Mexico’s certified
peanut producer organization enough
notice of their status change to a minor
peanut-producing state. Nominations to
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
72150
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
fill the at-large seats will take place
during the next nomination cycle.
Accordingly, this rule will amend
§§ 1216.15 and 1216.21 to define the
state of New Mexico as a minor peanutproducing state. This rule will require
primary peanut-producing states to
maintain a 3-year average production of
at least 20,000 tons of peanuts. This rule
will also revise § 1216.40(a) to specify
that the Board will be comprised of no
more than 12 peanut producer members
and their alternates rather than 13, and
revise § 1216.40(a)(1) to reflect the new
number of primary peanut-producing
states, by revising 12 to 11.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–
612), AMS is required to examine the
impact of the final rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small
Business Administration (SBA) defines,
in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural
producers as those having annual
receipts of no more than $1 million and
small agricultural service firms
(handlers) as those having annual
receipts of no more than $30 million.
According to the Board, there were
approximately 7,200 producers and 34
handlers of peanuts who were subject to
the program in 2019.
Most producers would be classified as
small agricultural production businesses
under the criteria established by the
SBA (no more than $1 million in annual
peanut sales). USDA’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
reported that crop values of peanuts
produced in the top 11 peanutproducing states for the years 2017,
2018, and 2019 were $1.63 billion, $1.17
billion, and $1.13 billion, respectively.
The 3-year crop average was $1.31
billion. With a 2019 crop value of $1.13
billion and a total of 7,200 producers,
average peanut sales per producer were
approximately $157,000. With a 2017–
2018 average crop value of $1.31 billion,
average sales per producer were
approximately $182,000. Both figures
are well below the $1 million threshold
for a small producer, providing strong
evidence that most peanut producers are
small businesses.
With 34 handlers, the average annual
peanut crop value per handler from
2017 to 2019 ranged from $33 million to
$48 million, with a 3-year average of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Dec 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
$39 million. With average sales figures
moderately higher than the small
business threshold size of $30 million,
it appears that several handlers are
small businesses and there are also a
number that are large businesses—no
definitive statement can be made.
According to NASS, the number of
pounds of U.S. peanut production from
11-primary peanut-producing states for
2017, 2018, and 2019 were 7.12 billion,
5.50 billion and 5.47 billion,
respectively. The 3-year average
production was 6.03 billion pounds.
Computations based on NASS data
show that Georgia was the largest
producer, with 50.9 percent of the 3year average quantity, followed by
Alabama (9.9 percent), Florida (9.9
percent), Texas (9.1 percent), North
Carolina (7.2 percent), South Carolina
(5.4 percent), Arkansas (2.4 percent),
Mississippi (1.9 percent), Virginia (1.8
percent), Oklahoma (1.0 percent), and
New Mexico (under one percent).
This action will amend §§ 1216.15,
1216.21, and 1216.40 to redefine the
state of New Mexico from a primary
peanut-producing state to a minor
peanut-producing state. The Order is
administered by the Board with
oversight by USDA. Under the Order,
primary peanut-producing states must
maintain a 3-year average production of
at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. This
action will increase the production
threshold to 20,000 tons of peanuts.
This action will expand the number of
minor peanut-producing states to ensure
that the Board obtains an adequate pool
of qualified producers to serve on the
Board to represent minor peanutproducing states. This action is
authorized under § 1216.87 of the Order.
Regarding the economic impact of this
final rule on affected entities, this action
will impose no costs on producers or
handlers. Changes will define the state
of New Mexico as a minor peanutproducing state based on the proposed
increase to the threshold to 20,000 tons
of peanuts.
Regarding alternatives, the Board has
been concerned about obtaining the
required two nominees for each open
seat to be submitted to the Secretary of
Agriculture for primary peanutproducing states and minor peanutproducing states. For years, the Board’s
staff has actively recruited candidates to
be considered for nomination from
multiple primary peanut-producing
states and minor peanut-producing
states, sometimes with little success.
The Board considered increasing the
threshold for primary peanut-producing
states from 10,000 to 30,000 per ton for
a 3-year production average. After
discussion, the Board voted to double
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the threshold and require the primary
peanut-producing states to maintain a 3year production average of at least
20,000 tons of peanuts.
In accordance with OMB regulation [5
CFR part 1320], which implements
information collection requirements
imposed by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.],
there are no new requirements
contained in this rule. In fact, a decrease
of 0.30 hours in the information
collection burden for the peanut
program is expected. Information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB under
OMB control number 0581–0093 and
0505–0001.
As with all Federal promotion
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Regarding outreach efforts, the Board
invited Executive Directors of certified
peanut producer organizations who
represent the primary peanut-producing
states (Georgia, Alabama, Texas, Florida,
North Carolina, South Carolina,
Mississippi, Missouri, Arkansas,
Virginia, Oklahoma, and New Mexico)
to attend its annual meeting on February
3, 2021. Most of the Executive Directors
for certified peanut producer
organizations attended this meeting. All
the Board’s meetings are open to the
public and interested persons are
invited to participate and express their
views. The Board announced that it
voted to increase the threshold level
from 10,000 to 20,000 per ton on a 3year average production for a state to
become a primary peanut-producing
state. No concerns were raised.
A 30-day comment period was
provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal which was
published in the Federal Register on
August 27, 2021 [86 FR 48046]. Copies
of the rule were made available through
the internet by the Department and the
Office of the Federal Register. The
comment period ended September 27,
2021.
Analysis of Comments
Three comments were received in
response to the proposed rule. Two
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
comments were received that were
determined to be immaterial to the
topic.
One commenter questioned if one
state, Georgia, produces half of the
peanuts in the United States, why do
they have a disproportionate say in the
promotion of peanuts on the Board?
Shouldn’t we be amending the Board to
better represent the actual production of
peanuts in the U.S., instead of assisting
the 32 states who barely number more
than 1% production?
Research and promotion programs are
well established as a way for producers,
importers, handlers, and any other
industry member to raise funds for
generic product promotion of a
commodity. The Board was established
consisting of producers from peanutproducing States. The Secretary of
Agriculture appoints members to the
Board from nominees submitted by the
industry according to regulations in its
Order.
Membership on the Board allows for
one member and one alternate from
each primary peanut-producing state,
who are producers and whose
nominations have been submitted by
certified peanut producer organizations
within a primary peanut-producing
state. Minor peanut-producing states
collectively have one at-large member
and one alternate, who are producers,
appointed from nominations submitted
by certified peanut producer
organizations within minor peanutproducing states or from other certified
farm organizations that include peanut
producers as part of their membership.
Georgia is currently represented by a
member and alternate on the Board.
Accordingly, no changes were made to
the rule as proposed, based on the
comments received.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendations
submitted by the Board, the comments
received, and other available
information, AMS finds that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, is consistent with
and will effectuate the purposes of the
1996 Act.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
PART 1216—PEANUT PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1216 continues to read as follows:
7 CFR Part 4274
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
RIN 0570–AA99
■
2. Section 1216.15 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 1216.15
Minor peanut-producing states.
Minor peanut-producing states means
all peanut-producing states with the
exception of Alabama, Arkansas,
Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri,
North Carolina, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, Texas, and Virginia.
3. Section 1216.21 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 1216.21
states.
Primary peanut-producing
Primary peanut-producing states
means Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Texas, and Virginia, provided that these
states maintain a 3-year average
production of at least 20,000 tons of
peanuts.
4. In § 1216.40, paragraphs (a)
introductory text and (a)(1) are revised
to read as follows:
■
§ 1216.40
Establishment and membership.
(a) Establishment of a National
Peanut Board. There is hereby
established a National Peanut Board,
hereinafter called the Board, comprised
of no more than 12 peanut producers
and alternates, appointed by the
Secretary from nominations as follows:
(1) Eleven members and alternates.
One member and one alternate shall be
appointed from each primary peanutproducing state, who are producers and
whose nominations have been
submitted by certified peanut producer
organizations within a primary peanutproducing state.
*
*
*
*
*
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1216
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Information, Marketing
agreements, Peanuts, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
[FR Doc. 2021–27513 Filed 12–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
Agricultural Marketing Service amends
7 CFR part 1216 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Dec 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
72151
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
[Docket No. RBS–20–BUSINESS–0032]
Intermediary Relending Program (IRP)
Program
Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Rural BusinessCooperative Service (RBCS), (Agency),
is completing a revision to the
Intermediary Relending Program (IRP)
regulations to streamline process,
provide clarity on the daily
administration of the program, and
incorporate program updates. The
regulatory cleanup incorporates the
program statutory requirements
established in the Agriculture
Improvement Act of 2018 (Farm Bill).
DATES: This final rule is effective
December 21, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sami Zarour, Supervisory Business
Loan and Grant Analyst, Program
Management Division, Rural BusinessCooperative Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, STOP 3226, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–3226; email: Sami.Zarour@
usda.gov; telephone (202) 720–1400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Intermediary Relending Program
(IRP), originally enacted under 42 U.S.C.
9812 and currently authorized at 7
U.S.C. 1936b, authorizes the Secretary
to make or guarantee low-interest loans
to local intermediaries to relend funds
to businesses to improve economic
conditions and create jobs in rural
communities. The purpose of the IRP is
to alleviate poverty and increase
economic activity and employment in
rural communities, especially
disadvantaged and remote communities,
through financing targeted towards
smaller and emerging businesses, in
partnership with other public and
private resources, and in accordance
with State and regional strategy, based
on identified community needs. This
purpose is achieved through loans made
to intermediaries that provide loans to
ultimate recipients to promote
community development, establish new
businesses, establish and support
microlending programs and create or
retain employment opportunities in
predominantly rural areas. The
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 21, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72148-72151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27513]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1216
[Document Number AMS-SC-20-0100]
Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Increase the
Threshold of the Primary Peanut-Producing States and Adjustment of
Membership
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, Department of Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule changes the threshold for defining primary peanut-
producing states as states that maintain a 3-year average production of
at least 20,000 tons of peanuts, instead of 10,000 tons of peanuts as
currently prescribed in the Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information
Order (Order). The Order is administered by the National Peanut Board
(Board) with oversight by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). As
a result of increasing the threshold, the Board's membership will
decrease from 13 to 12 members and their respective alternates. This
change will contribute to effective administration of the program.
DATES: Effective January 20, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria M. Carpenter, Marketing
Specialist, Mid Atlantic Branch, Market Development Division, Specialty
Crops Program, AMS, USDA, Stop 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room
1406-S, Washington, DC 20250-0244; Telephone: (202) 720-6930; or Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under the Order (7 CFR
part 1216). The Order is authorized under the Commodity Promotion,
Research, and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in accordance with requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has assessed the
impact of this rule on Indian tribes and determined that this rule will
not have tribal implications that require consultation under Executive
Order 13175. AMS hosts a quarterly teleconference with tribal leaders
where matters of mutual interest regarding the marketing of
agricultural products are discussed. Information about changes to
regulations were shared during a recent quarterly call, and tribal
leaders were informed about the revisions to the regulation and had the
opportunity to submit comments. AMS will continue to work with the USDA
Office of Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful consultation is
provided as needed with regards to this change to the Order.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. Section
524 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides that it shall not affect
or preempt any other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or
research relating to an agricultural commodity.
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7418), a person subject
to an order may file a written petition with USDA stating that an
order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with an order, is not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an order or an exemption from an
order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision of an
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be
filed within two years after the effective date of an order, provision,
or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will
have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, USDA
will issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996 Act provides that the
district court of the United States for any district in which the
petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of USDA's final ruling.
Background
This rule will increase the threshold for defining primary peanut-
producing states as states that maintain a 3-year average production of
at least 20,000 tons of peanuts, instead of 10,000 tons of peanuts as
currently prescribed in the Order. This will help ensure that the Board
reflects the peanut production in the United States. The Order is
administered by the Board with oversight by USDA.
The Order became effective on July 30, 1999. Under the Order, the
Board administers a nationally coordinated program of promotion,
research and information designed to strengthen the position of peanuts
in the marketplace and to develop, maintain, and expand the demand for
peanuts in the United States. Under the program, assessments are levied
on all farmers' stock peanuts sold at a rate of $3.55 per ton for
Segregation 1 peanuts, and $1.25 per ton for Segregation 2 peanuts and
3 peanuts, as those terms are defined in 7 CFR 996.13(b) through (d).
Assessments are remitted to the Board by handlers and, for peanuts
under loan, by the Commodity Credit Corporation.
The Order defines the terms ``minor peanut-producing states'' and
``primary peanut-producing states'' for purposes of Board
representation and voting at meetings. According to USDA, Federal-State
Inspection Service, National Peanut Tonnage Reports, there are 13
peanut-producing states, which include: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina,
Oklahoma,
[[Page 72149]]
South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia. Section 1216.21 currently defines
primary peanut-producing states as Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, Texas, and Virginia. These states must maintain a 3-year
average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts to meet the
current definition. All other peanut-producing states are defined as
minor peanut-producing states in Sec. 1216.15 and are represented by
one member and one alternate on the Board--currently only Louisiana
meets this definition.
With the growth in farm size, there are fewer and larger peanut
producers than when the Order was promulgated in 1999. As stated above,
currently, there is only one state, Louisiana, that represents the
minor peanut-producing states, which is the at-large position on the
Board. This makes it difficult to get adequate numbers of nominees to
fill both member and alternate member seats on the Board. By increasing
the threshold for defining primary peanut-producing states to states
that maintain a 3-year average production of at least 20,000 tons
instead of 10,000 tons of peanuts as currently prescribed, this action
will increase the candidate pool for at-large member seats on the
Board.
Pursuant to Sec. 1216.87, amendments to the Order may be proposed
from time to time by the Board or by any interested person affected by
provisions of the 1996 Act, including the Secretary of Agriculture.
For several years, the Board has been concerned about having enough
nominees to fill vacant seats and was hopeful that the situation would
improve. The Board staff has actively recruited candidates to be
considered for nomination from multiple primary peanut-producing states
and the at-large state, sometimes with little success. Due to an
alternate member vacancy for New Mexico and difficulty finding
producers to serve, the Board determined it was time to increase the 3-
year average.
The Board discussed increasing the threshold with the industry to
explain the situation, and determined that increasing the threshold for
defining primary peanut-producing states was a good way to give the
peanut producing states an opportunity to be nominated for a member or
alternate seat on the Board.
Board Recommendation
The Board met to discuss methods to increase the pool of candidates
for representation of the minor peanut-producing states to serve on the
Board. At the time of the Board's formation in July 1999 (64 FR 41252),
peanut farms were smaller, and therefore, there were many more
producers eligible to be nominated to serve on the Board. In April
1999, USDA reported there were approximately 25,000 peanut producers
(64 FR 80107). Based on the Board's records, for the 2018 production
crop year, there were 8,126 peanut producers and for the 2019 crop
year, there were 7,200 peanut producers.
Currently, in minor peanut-producing states the pool of candidates
is very small, with Louisiana being the only state in this category.
The Board has had difficulty in gathering the required two nominees for
each open position for submission to the Secretary of Agriculture.
The Board has been concerned about this issue for several years and
was hopeful that the situation would improve. For approximately 10
years, the Board's management has actively recruited candidates to be
considered for nomination from multiple primary and minor peanut-
producing states to fill seats on the Board. In the 2020 submission to
the Secretary for appointments to fill member and alternate seats for
New Mexico, only two nominees were submitted for consideration instead
of four. Therefore, only the member seat was filled, and the alternate
seat remains vacant. In addition, since there is currently only one
state (Louisiana) representing minor peanut-producing states, it is
often difficult to get a sufficient number of nominees to fill member
and alternate positions as well. These nominees are comprised of
producers of all sizes including small producers.
In 1999, the Board was comprised of 10 members and their
alternates. The Board's representation for primary peanut-producing
states were Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia and minor peanut-
producing states were represented by a Louisiana member and an Arizona
alternate member. Over the years, there have been three adjustments of
membership, which increased the size of the Board's membership. On July
9, 2008, the Board increased its membership from 10 to 11 when it added
Mississippi as a primary peanut-producing state (73 FR 39214). On March
21, 2014, the Board increased its membership a second time from 11 to
12 when it added Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing state (79 FR
15636). The most recent change in the Board's membership was the
addition of Missouri, which was published on March 23, 2020 (85 FR
16229). That addition increased the membership from 12 to 13.
For the 2019 production year, computations based on Federal State
Inspection Service data show that Georgia was the largest producer,
with 49.8 percent followed by Florida (10.7 percent), Alabama (9.4
percent), Texas (8.7 percent), North Carolina (8.1 percent), South
Carolina (4.1 percent), Arkansas (3.1 percent), Virginia (2.0 percent),
Mississippi (1.4 percent), Missouri (1.2 percent), Oklahoma (1.0
percent), and New Mexico (0.3 percent). Currently, these 12 states are
considered primary peanut-producing states and they each have a member,
with their alternate, seated on the Board. All other states (minor
peanut-producing states) that produce peanuts are represented by the
at-large member.
There is currently only one minor peanut-producing state
(Louisiana) representing ``at-large'' seats. That minor peanut-
producing state has only five producers producing peanuts in that
state. Increasing the threshold from 10,000 tons to 20,000 tons will
cause the state of New Mexico to become a minor peanut-producing state
instead of a primary peanut-producing state. This change will increase
the pool of candidates eligible to represent minor peanut-producing
states as the at-large member and alternate. Minor peanut-producing
states will be represented by Louisiana and New Mexico. This rule will
increase the threshold for defining primary peanut-producing states as
states that maintain a 3-year average production of at least 20,000
tons of peanuts instead of 10,000 tons of peanuts, an increase of
10,000 tons.
The intent of the Order is to allow peanut farmers to oversee a
peanut research, marketing, and promotion organization to improve their
economic condition. To be successful, there must be an adequate pool of
interested, qualified producers to serve on the Board. The Board voted
unanimously on December 3, 2020, and February 3, 2021, to raise the
threshold for primary peanut-producing states to those that maintain a
3-year average production of at least 20,000 tons of peanuts. This rule
will cause the state of New Mexico to become a minor peanut-producing
state instead of a primary peanut-producing state, since its production
will be below the proposed 20,000-ton threshold. Minor peanut-producing
states will be represented by Louisiana and New Mexico. The Board
recommended that the change take place by January 1, 2022, to give New
Mexico's certified peanut producer organization enough notice of their
status change to a minor peanut-producing state. Nominations to
[[Page 72150]]
fill the at-large seats will take place during the next nomination
cycle.
Accordingly, this rule will amend Sec. Sec. 1216.15 and 1216.21 to
define the state of New Mexico as a minor peanut-producing state. This
rule will require primary peanut-producing states to maintain a 3-year
average production of at least 20,000 tons of peanuts. This rule will
also revise Sec. 1216.40(a) to specify that the Board will be
comprised of no more than 12 peanut producer members and their
alternates rather than 13, and revise Sec. 1216.40(a)(1) to reflect
the new number of primary peanut-producing states, by revising 12 to
11.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
601-612), AMS is required to examine the impact of the final rule on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration (SBA)
defines, in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural producers as those
having annual receipts of no more than $1 million and small
agricultural service firms (handlers) as those having annual receipts
of no more than $30 million.
According to the Board, there were approximately 7,200 producers
and 34 handlers of peanuts who were subject to the program in 2019.
Most producers would be classified as small agricultural production
businesses under the criteria established by the SBA (no more than $1
million in annual peanut sales). USDA's National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) reported that crop values of peanuts produced
in the top 11 peanut-producing states for the years 2017, 2018, and
2019 were $1.63 billion, $1.17 billion, and $1.13 billion,
respectively. The 3-year crop average was $1.31 billion. With a 2019
crop value of $1.13 billion and a total of 7,200 producers, average
peanut sales per producer were approximately $157,000. With a 2017-2018
average crop value of $1.31 billion, average sales per producer were
approximately $182,000. Both figures are well below the $1 million
threshold for a small producer, providing strong evidence that most
peanut producers are small businesses.
With 34 handlers, the average annual peanut crop value per handler
from 2017 to 2019 ranged from $33 million to $48 million, with a 3-year
average of $39 million. With average sales figures moderately higher
than the small business threshold size of $30 million, it appears that
several handlers are small businesses and there are also a number that
are large businesses--no definitive statement can be made.
According to NASS, the number of pounds of U.S. peanut production
from 11-primary peanut-producing states for 2017, 2018, and 2019 were
7.12 billion, 5.50 billion and 5.47 billion, respectively. The 3-year
average production was 6.03 billion pounds. Computations based on NASS
data show that Georgia was the largest producer, with 50.9 percent of
the 3-year average quantity, followed by Alabama (9.9 percent), Florida
(9.9 percent), Texas (9.1 percent), North Carolina (7.2 percent), South
Carolina (5.4 percent), Arkansas (2.4 percent), Mississippi (1.9
percent), Virginia (1.8 percent), Oklahoma (1.0 percent), and New
Mexico (under one percent).
This action will amend Sec. Sec. 1216.15, 1216.21, and 1216.40 to
redefine the state of New Mexico from a primary peanut-producing state
to a minor peanut-producing state. The Order is administered by the
Board with oversight by USDA. Under the Order, primary peanut-producing
states must maintain a 3-year average production of at least 10,000
tons of peanuts. This action will increase the production threshold to
20,000 tons of peanuts. This action will expand the number of minor
peanut-producing states to ensure that the Board obtains an adequate
pool of qualified producers to serve on the Board to represent minor
peanut-producing states. This action is authorized under Sec. 1216.87
of the Order.
Regarding the economic impact of this final rule on affected
entities, this action will impose no costs on producers or handlers.
Changes will define the state of New Mexico as a minor peanut-producing
state based on the proposed increase to the threshold to 20,000 tons of
peanuts.
Regarding alternatives, the Board has been concerned about
obtaining the required two nominees for each open seat to be submitted
to the Secretary of Agriculture for primary peanut-producing states and
minor peanut-producing states. For years, the Board's staff has
actively recruited candidates to be considered for nomination from
multiple primary peanut-producing states and minor peanut-producing
states, sometimes with little success. The Board considered increasing
the threshold for primary peanut-producing states from 10,000 to 30,000
per ton for a 3-year production average. After discussion, the Board
voted to double the threshold and require the primary peanut-producing
states to maintain a 3-year production average of at least 20,000 tons
of peanuts.
In accordance with OMB regulation [5 CFR part 1320], which
implements information collection requirements imposed by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.], there are no new
requirements contained in this rule. In fact, a decrease of 0.30 hours
in the information collection burden for the peanut program is
expected. Information collection requirements have been previously
approved by OMB under OMB control number 0581-0093 and 0505-0001.
As with all Federal promotion programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Regarding outreach efforts, the Board invited Executive Directors
of certified peanut producer organizations who represent the primary
peanut-producing states (Georgia, Alabama, Texas, Florida, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Missouri, Arkansas, Virginia,
Oklahoma, and New Mexico) to attend its annual meeting on February 3,
2021. Most of the Executive Directors for certified peanut producer
organizations attended this meeting. All the Board's meetings are open
to the public and interested persons are invited to participate and
express their views. The Board announced that it voted to increase the
threshold level from 10,000 to 20,000 per ton on a 3-year average
production for a state to become a primary peanut-producing state. No
concerns were raised.
A 30-day comment period was provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal which was published in the Federal Register on
August 27, 2021 [86 FR 48046]. Copies of the rule were made available
through the internet by the Department and the Office of the Federal
Register. The comment period ended September 27, 2021.
Analysis of Comments
Three comments were received in response to the proposed rule. Two
[[Page 72151]]
comments were received that were determined to be immaterial to the
topic.
One commenter questioned if one state, Georgia, produces half of
the peanuts in the United States, why do they have a disproportionate
say in the promotion of peanuts on the Board? Shouldn't we be amending
the Board to better represent the actual production of peanuts in the
U.S., instead of assisting the 32 states who barely number more than 1%
production?
Research and promotion programs are well established as a way for
producers, importers, handlers, and any other industry member to raise
funds for generic product promotion of a commodity. The Board was
established consisting of producers from peanut-producing States. The
Secretary of Agriculture appoints members to the Board from nominees
submitted by the industry according to regulations in its Order.
Membership on the Board allows for one member and one alternate
from each primary peanut-producing state, who are producers and whose
nominations have been submitted by certified peanut producer
organizations within a primary peanut-producing state. Minor peanut-
producing states collectively have one at-large member and one
alternate, who are producers, appointed from nominations submitted by
certified peanut producer organizations within minor peanut-producing
states or from other certified farm organizations that include peanut
producers as part of their membership. Georgia is currently represented
by a member and alternate on the Board. Accordingly, no changes were
made to the rule as proposed, based on the comments received.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendations submitted by the Board, the
comments received, and other available information, AMS finds that this
rule, as hereinafter set forth, is consistent with and will effectuate
the purposes of the 1996 Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1216
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Information, Marketing agreements, Peanuts, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, Agricultural Marketing
Service amends 7 CFR part 1216 as follows:
PART 1216--PEANUT PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION ORDER
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1216 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425 and 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. Section 1216.15 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1216.15 Minor peanut-producing states.
Minor peanut-producing states means all peanut-producing states
with the exception of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi,
Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and
Virginia.
0
3. Section 1216.21 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1216.21 Primary peanut-producing states.
Primary peanut-producing states means Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, Texas, and Virginia, provided that these states maintain a 3-
year average production of at least 20,000 tons of peanuts.
0
4. In Sec. 1216.40, paragraphs (a) introductory text and (a)(1) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1216.40 Establishment and membership.
(a) Establishment of a National Peanut Board. There is hereby
established a National Peanut Board, hereinafter called the Board,
comprised of no more than 12 peanut producers and alternates, appointed
by the Secretary from nominations as follows:
(1) Eleven members and alternates. One member and one alternate
shall be appointed from each primary peanut-producing state, who are
producers and whose nominations have been submitted by certified peanut
producer organizations within a primary peanut-producing state.
* * * * *
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-27513 Filed 12-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P