Indemnification of Employees, 71863-71864 [2021-27479]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 241 / Monday, December 20, 2021 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 761
Environmental protection, Hazardous
substances, Incorporation by reference,
Labeling, Polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 14, 2021.
Carolyn Hoskinson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and
Recovery.
[FR Doc. 2021–27407 Filed 12–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the
Humanities
Request for Comments
NEH requests comments, which NEH
must receive at the above address, by
the above date.
45 CFR Part 1173
RIN 3136–AA45
Indemnification of Employees
National Endowment for the
Humanities, National Foundation on the
Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The National Endowment for
the Humanities (NEH) is proposing to
publish a policy that permits
indemnification of NEH employees in
appropriate circumstances, as
determined by the Chairperson of NEH
or the Chairperson’s designee, for claims
made against NEH employees as a result
of actions taken by them in the scope of
their employment.
DATES: Send comments on or before
January 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
email to gencounsel@neh.gov.
Instructions: Include ‘‘3136–AA44’’ in
the subject line of the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel,
National Endowment for the
Humanities, 400 7th Street SW, Room
4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202) 606–
8322; gencounsel@neh.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
The Federal courts have upheld the
authority of a Federal agency to
establish procedures governing the
production of records and testimony by
personnel in legal proceedings in which
the agency is not a party. United States
ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462
(1951). This proposed rule would
establish policies and procedures that
the agency will follow when, in a legal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
proceeding, a current or former NEH
employee receives a demand or request
to testify as to facts or events that relate
to his or her official duties or the
functions of NEH or to produce official
records and information.
This proposed rule relates to
testimony and the production of records
only in connection with legal
proceedings to which the United States
is not a party. It would not apply to
requests under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a;
Congressional demands or requests for
testimony or records; or legal
proceedings to which the United States
is a party.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for review.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have
federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This rulemaking meets the applicable
standards set forth in section 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rulemaking is written
in clear language designed to help
reduce litigation.
Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal
Governments
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13175, NEH evaluated this rulemaking
and determined that it will not have any
potential effects on Federally recognized
Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 12630, Takings
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this rulemaking does not have
significant takings implications.
Therefore, a takings implication
assessment is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
This rulemaking will not have a
significant adverse impact on a
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71863
substantial number of small entities,
including small businesses, small
governmental jurisdictions, or certain
small not-for-profit organizations.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. This action
contains no provisions constituting a
collection of information pursuant to
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rulemaking does not contain a
Federal mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year.
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969
This rulemaking will not have a
significant effect on the human
environment.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking will not be a major
rule as defined in section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rulemaking
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, a
major increase in costs or prices,
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
E-Government Act of 2002
All information about NEH required
to be published in the Federal Register
may be accessed at www.neh.gov. The
website www.regulations.gov contains
electronic dockets for NEH’s
rulemakings under the Administrative
Procedure Act of 1946.
Plain Writing Act of 2010
To ensure this proposed rule speaks
in plain and clear language so that the
public can use and understand it, NEH
modeled the language of the proposed
rule on the Federal Plain Language
Guidelines.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1173
Administrative practice and
procedure.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the National Endowment for
the Humanities proposes to amend 45
CFR chapter XI by adding part 1173,
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
71864
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 241 / Monday, December 20, 2021 / Proposed Rules
consisting of §§ 1173.1 and 1173.2, to
read as follows:
PART 1173—INDEMNIFICATION OF
EMPLOYEES
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1173.1 Policy on employee
indemnification.
(a) This part explains when the
National Endowment for the Humanities
(NEH) will indemnify you, an employee
or a former employee of NEH, against a
verdict, judgment, or other monetary
award that a court or other competent
authority renders against you. When
NEH indemnifies you against a verdict,
judgment, or other monetary award, it
means that NEH will pay the amounts
that the court orders you to pay.
(b) This part also explains when NEH
will settle a claim (also referred to as
compromising a claim) that someone
brings or threatens to bring against you
in court or before another competent
authority. It is only in exceptional
circumstances that NEH will agree to
settle a claim before a court or other
competent authority has entered a
verdict, judgment, or monetary award
against you.
(c) In order for NEH to indemnify you
or settle a claim:
(1) The verdict, judgment, or
monetary award to be paid or the claim
to be settled must relate to something
that you did (or failed to do) within the
scope of your employment with NEH;
and
(2) The Chairperson of NEH or
someone the Chairperson designates
(the Agency Official) must determine, as
a matter of discretion, that indemnifying
you or settling the claim would be in the
interest of NEH.
(d) If you become aware that someone
has made or may make a claim against
you personally as a result of something
that you did (or failed to do) within the
scope of your employment, you must
immediately notify the Office of the
General Counsel.
(e) To request that NEH indemnify
you or settle a claim against you, you
must submit a written request to the
Office of the General Counsel. You must
include a copy of the verdict, judgment,
monetary award, or settlement proposal,
as appropriate. The Office of the General
Counsel may consult about the matter
with your supervisor, other agency
employees, and the Department of
Justice.
(f) The Agency Official may waive the
requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e)
of this section if it would be in the
interest of NEH to do so.
(g) If the Agency Official determines
that NEH will indemnify you or settle a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
claim on your behalf, NEH’s
commitment will be subject to the
availability of appropriated funds. The
Agency Official may impose other
conditions or limitations on the
determination at his or her discretion.
(h) If the Chairperson requests
indemnification or settlement of a
claim, the General Counsel will perform
the functions assigned to the
Chairperson under this section with
respect to that request.
§ 1173.2
[Reserved]
Dated: December 15, 2021.
Samuel Roth,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for
the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2021–27479 Filed 12–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 50, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58,
59, 61, 62, 63, and 64
[Docket No. USCG–2020–0634]
RIN 1625–AC72
Updates to Marine Engineering
Standards
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is extending
the comment period by 45 days for the
notice of proposed rulemaking,
‘‘Updates to Marine Engineering
Standards,’’ published on October 19,
2021, which proposes to incorporate by
reference updated marine engineering
standards and eliminate outdated or
unnecessarily prescriptive regulations.
We are extending the comment period
to allow the public more time to
comment on the proposed rulemaking.
The comment period is now open
through February 3, 2022.
DATES: The deadline for the comment
period for the proposed rule published
October 19, 2021 (86 FR 57896) is
extended. Comments and related
material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before February 3, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2020–0634 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
further instructions on submitting
comments.
For
further information about this document
call or email Thane Gilman, Systems
Engineering Division (CG–ENG–3), 2703
Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE,
Washington, DC 20593. Phone (202)
372–1383, Email: thane.gilman@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
The Coast Guard views public
participation as essential to effective
rulemaking, and will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. Your comment can
help shape the outcome of this
rulemaking. If you submit a comment,
please include the docket number for
this rulemaking, indicate the specific
section of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. If you cannot
submit your material by using
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions. We review all
comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of
the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments we post to https://
www.regulations.gov will include any
personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this
document, see the Department of
Homeland Security’s eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
Background and Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking, ‘‘Updates to Marine
Engineering Standards,’’ on October 19,
2021 (86 FR 57896). In it we proposed
to incorporate by reference updated
marine engineering standards and
eliminate outdated or unnecessarily
prescriptive regulations in title 46 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
subchapter F. This proposed rule is part
of a continuing effort for regulatory
reform that increases compliance
options for the regulated public while
providing a cost savings to the regulated
public and the U.S. government.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 241 (Monday, December 20, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71863-71864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27479]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Humanities
45 CFR Part 1173
RIN 3136-AA45
Indemnification of Employees
AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities, National Foundation on
the Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is proposing
to publish a policy that permits indemnification of NEH employees in
appropriate circumstances, as determined by the Chairperson of NEH or
the Chairperson's designee, for claims made against NEH employees as a
result of actions taken by them in the scope of their employment.
DATES: Send comments on or before January 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by email to [email protected].
Instructions: Include ``3136-AA44'' in the subject line of the
email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, National Endowment for the
Humanities, 400 7th Street SW, Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202)
606-8322; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal courts have upheld the authority of a Federal agency to
establish procedures governing the production of records and testimony
by personnel in legal proceedings in which the agency is not a party.
United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). This
proposed rule would establish policies and procedures that the agency
will follow when, in a legal proceeding, a current or former NEH
employee receives a demand or request to testify as to facts or events
that relate to his or her official duties or the functions of NEH or to
produce official records and information.
This proposed rule relates to testimony and the production of
records only in connection with legal proceedings to which the United
States is not a party. It would not apply to requests under the Freedom
of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C.
552a; Congressional demands or requests for testimony or records; or
legal proceedings to which the United States is a party.
Request for Comments
NEH requests comments, which NEH must receive at the above address,
by the above date.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for
review.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have federalism implications. It will not
have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship
between the National Government and the states, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This rulemaking meets the applicable standards set forth in section
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988. Specifically, this
rulemaking is written in clear language designed to help reduce
litigation.
Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal Governments
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175, NEH evaluated this
rulemaking and determined that it will not have any potential effects
on Federally recognized Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 12630, Takings
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rulemaking does
not have significant takings implications. Therefore, a takings
implication assessment is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
This rulemaking will not have a significant adverse impact on a
substantial number of small entities, including small businesses, small
governmental jurisdictions, or certain small not-for-profit
organizations.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not impose an information collection burden
under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This action contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not contain a Federal mandate that will result
in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one
year.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
This rulemaking will not have a significant effect on the human
environment.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking will not be a major rule as defined in section 804
of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This
rulemaking will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, a major increase in costs or prices, significant
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete
with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
E-Government Act of 2002
All information about NEH required to be published in the Federal
Register may be accessed at www.neh.gov. The website
www.regulations.gov contains electronic dockets for NEH's rulemakings
under the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946.
Plain Writing Act of 2010
To ensure this proposed rule speaks in plain and clear language so
that the public can use and understand it, NEH modeled the language of
the proposed rule on the Federal Plain Language Guidelines.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1173
Administrative practice and procedure.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the National Endowment
for the Humanities proposes to amend 45 CFR chapter XI by adding part
1173,
[[Page 71864]]
consisting of Sec. Sec. 1173.1 and 1173.2, to read as follows:
PART 1173--INDEMNIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301.
Sec. 1173.1 Policy on employee indemnification.
(a) This part explains when the National Endowment for the
Humanities (NEH) will indemnify you, an employee or a former employee
of NEH, against a verdict, judgment, or other monetary award that a
court or other competent authority renders against you. When NEH
indemnifies you against a verdict, judgment, or other monetary award,
it means that NEH will pay the amounts that the court orders you to
pay.
(b) This part also explains when NEH will settle a claim (also
referred to as compromising a claim) that someone brings or threatens
to bring against you in court or before another competent authority. It
is only in exceptional circumstances that NEH will agree to settle a
claim before a court or other competent authority has entered a
verdict, judgment, or monetary award against you.
(c) In order for NEH to indemnify you or settle a claim:
(1) The verdict, judgment, or monetary award to be paid or the
claim to be settled must relate to something that you did (or failed to
do) within the scope of your employment with NEH; and
(2) The Chairperson of NEH or someone the Chairperson designates
(the Agency Official) must determine, as a matter of discretion, that
indemnifying you or settling the claim would be in the interest of NEH.
(d) If you become aware that someone has made or may make a claim
against you personally as a result of something that you did (or failed
to do) within the scope of your employment, you must immediately notify
the Office of the General Counsel.
(e) To request that NEH indemnify you or settle a claim against
you, you must submit a written request to the Office of the General
Counsel. You must include a copy of the verdict, judgment, monetary
award, or settlement proposal, as appropriate. The Office of the
General Counsel may consult about the matter with your supervisor,
other agency employees, and the Department of Justice.
(f) The Agency Official may waive the requirements of paragraphs
(d) and (e) of this section if it would be in the interest of NEH to do
so.
(g) If the Agency Official determines that NEH will indemnify you
or settle a claim on your behalf, NEH's commitment will be subject to
the availability of appropriated funds. The Agency Official may impose
other conditions or limitations on the determination at his or her
discretion.
(h) If the Chairperson requests indemnification or settlement of a
claim, the General Counsel will perform the functions assigned to the
Chairperson under this section with respect to that request.
Sec. 1173.2 [Reserved]
Dated: December 15, 2021.
Samuel Roth,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2021-27479 Filed 12-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P