Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreements With Foreign Postal Operators, 71933-71934 [2021-27414]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 241 / Monday, December 20, 2021 / Notices
with awareness of, and the ability to
take action on, any actual or potential
funding deficiencies. Additionally, 10
CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vi) requires that the
annual financial assurance status report
must include additional financial
assurance to cover the estimated cost of
completion if the sum of the balance of
any remaining decommissioning funds,
plus earnings on such funds calculated
at not greater than a 2-percent real rate
of return, together with the amount
provided by other financial assurance
methods being relied upon, does not
cover the estimated cost to complete the
decommissioning. The requested
exemption would not allow the
withdrawal of funds from the DTF for
any other purpose that is not currently
authorized in the regulations without
prior notification to the NRC. Therefore,
the granting of the exemption to 10 CFR
50.75(h)(1)(iv) to allow HDI to make
withdrawals from the PNP DTF to cover
authorized expenses for spent fuel
management and site restoration
activities at PNP without prior written
notification to the NRC will still meet
the underlying purpose of the
regulation.
Special circumstances, in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii), are present
whenever compliance would result in
undue hardship or other costs that are
significantly in excess of those
contemplated when the regulation was
adopted, or that are significantly in
excess of those incurred by others
similarly situated. HDI states that the
DTF contains funds in excess of the
estimated costs of radiological
decommissioning and that these excess
funds are needed for spent fuel
management and site restoration
activities. The NRC does not preclude
the use of funds from the DTF in excess
of those needed for radiological
decommissioning for other purposes,
such as for spent fuel management or
site restoration activities.
The NRC has stated that funding for
spent fuel management and site
restoration activities may be
commingled in DTFs, provided that the
licensee is able to identify and account
for the radiological decommissioning
funds separately from the funds set
aside for spent fuel management and
site restoration activities (see NRC
Regulatory Issue Summary 2001–07,
Rev. 1, ‘‘10 CFR 50.75 Reporting and
Recordkeeping for Decommissioning
Planning,’’ dated January 8, 2009
(ADAMS Accession No. ML083440158),
and Regulatory Guide 1.184, Revision 1,
‘‘Decommissioning of Nuclear Power
Reactors,’’ dated October 2013 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13144A840)).
Preventing access to those excess funds
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Dec 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
in DTFs because spent fuel management
and site restoration activities are not
associated with radiological
decommissioning would create an
unnecessary financial burden without
any corresponding safety benefit. The
adequacy of the PNP DTF to cover the
cost of activities associated with spent
fuel management and site restoration, in
addition to radiological
decommissioning, is supported by the
HDI SSCE. If HDI cannot use the PNP
DTF for spent fuel management and site
restoration activities, it would need to
obtain additional funding that would
not be recoverable from the DTF, or it
would have to modify its
decommissioning approach and
methods. The NRC staff concludes that
either outcome would impose an
unnecessary and undue burden
significantly in excess of that
contemplated when 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR
50.75(h)(1)(iv) were adopted.
The underlying purposes of 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR
50.75(h)(1)(iv) would be achieved by
allowing HDI to use a portion of the
PNP DTF for spent fuel management
and site restoration activities at PNP
without prior NRC notification, and
compliance with the regulations would
result in an undue hardship or other
costs that are significantly in excess of
those contemplated when the
regulations were adopted. Thus, the
special circumstances in 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii) and 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii)
exist and support the approval of the
requested exemption.
E. Environmental Considerations
In accordance with 10 CFR 51.31(a),
the Commission has determined that
granting the exemption will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (see Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact published in the
Federal Register on November 26, 2021
(86 FR 67503)).
IV. Conclusions.
In consideration of the above, the
NRC staff finds that the proposed
exemption confirms the adequacy of
funding in the PNP DTF, considering
growth, to complete radiological
decommissioning of the site and to
terminate the licenses and also to cover
estimated spent fuel management and
site restoration activities.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71933
and security. Also, special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the Commission hereby grants HDI an
exemption from the requirements of 10
CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR
50.75(h)(1)(iv) to allow the use of a
portion of the funds from the PNP DTF
for spent fuel management and site
restoration activities at PNP in
accordance with HDI’s PSDAR and
SSCE, dated December 23, 2020.
Additionally, the Commission hereby
grants HDI an exemption from the
requirement of 10 CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv) to
allow such withdrawals without prior
NRC notification.
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated: December 13, 2021.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Brian D. Wittick,
Deputy Director, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2021–27491 Filed 12–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2022–36; Order No. 6063]
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreements With Foreign Postal
Operators
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is
acknowledging a recent filing by the
Postal Service that it has entered into
the Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreement with Foreign Postal
Operators (FPOs). This notice informs
the public of the filing, invites public
comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: December
21, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Summary of the FPO–USPS Agreement
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
71934
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 241 / Monday, December 20, 2021 / Notices
FY22–2
III. Notice of Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On December 13, 2021, the Postal
Service filed a notice with the
Commission pursuant to 39 CFR
3035.105 and Order No. 546,1
concerning the inbound portions of an
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreement with a Foreign Postal
Operator (FPO) which the Postal Service
seeks to include within the Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreement
with Foreign Postal Operators 1
(MC2010–34 product).2
II. Summary of the FPO–USPS
Agreement FY22–2
The FPO–USPS Agreement FY22–2 is
intended to become effective on January
1, 2022, and will, unless terminated
earlier, expire on December 31, 2023.
Except as otherwise agreed by contract,
the FPO exchanges mail with the Postal
Service and applies the Universal Postal
Convention and Universal Postal
Convention Regulations to those
exchanges. The competitive services
offered by the Postal Service to the FPO
in FPO–USPS Agreement FY22–2
include rates for inbound parcels,
packets, and international Express Mail
Service. Notice at 5–6. The Postal
Service states that ‘‘[m]any rates will be
based on a per-piece and per-kilo
structure and in Special Drawing
Rights. . . .’’ Id. at 6 (footnote omitted).
Only the inbound portions of the FPO–
USPS Agreement FY22–2 that concern
competitive products are included in
the proposal filed in this docket. Id.
Outbound delivery of competitive postal
products within the FPO’s country have
not previously been presented to the
Commission and are not presented in
this Notice. Id.
Accompanying the Notice are:
• Attachment 1—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
agreement and supporting documents
under seal;
• Attachment 2—a redacted copy of
FPO–USPS Agreement FY22–2;
• Attachment 3—a copy of the
Governors’ Decision No. 19–1;
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
1 Docket
Nos. MC2010–34 and CP2010–95, Order
Adding Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreements with Foreign Postal Service Operators
1 to the Competitive Product List and Approving
Included Agreement, September 29, 2010 (Order
No. 546).
2 See Notice of United States Postal Service of
Filing Functionally Equivalent Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign
Postal Operator—FY22–2, December 13, 2021, at 1
(Notice). The Postal Service refers to the agreement
as ‘‘FPO–USPS Agreement FY22–2.’’ Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Dec 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
• Attachment 4—a certified statement
required by 39 CFR 3035.105(c)(2); and
• Supporting financial
documentation as separate Excel files.
The Postal Service asserts that ‘‘[t]he
FPO–USPS Agreement FY22–2 is
functionally equivalent to the baseline
agreement filed in Docket No. MC2010–
34 because the terms of this agreement
are similar in scope and purpose to the
terms of the CP2010–95 Agreement’’
that is used for functional equivalency
analyses of the Inbound Competitive
Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign
Postal Operators 1 product.’’ 3 The
Postal Service states that ‘‘[b]ecause the
FPO–USPS Agreement FY22–2 and the
CP2010–95 Agreement incorporate the
same cost attributes and methodology,
the relevant cost and market
characteristics are similar.’’ Notice at 9.
Additionally, the Postal Service
asserts that the FPO–USPS Agreement
FY22–2 is in compliance with 39 U.S.C.
3633. Id. The Postal Service states
further that the FPO–USPS Agreement
FY22–2 is essentially an updated
version of the FPO–USPS Agreement
FY20–1, which was previously included
in the Inbound Competitive MultiService Agreements with Postal
Operators 1 product.4
The Postal Service asserts that its
proposed addition of FPO–USPS
Agreement FY22–2 to the Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreement
with Foreign Postal Operators 1 product
is also supported by prior Commission
determinations that bilateral agreements
with FPOs and negotiated service
agreements should be included in the
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreement with Foreign Postal
Operators 1 product. Notice at 3–4.
III. Notice of Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2022–36 for consideration of the
Notice pertaining to FPO–USPS
Agreement FY22–2 and the related rates
and classifications. The Commission
invites comments on whether the Postal
3 Notice at 3. An agreement (the CP2010–95
Agreement) was originally presented to the
Commission in Docket No. CP2010–95 for inclusion
in the Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators 1
product. Order No. 546 at 8–10. The CP2010–95
Agreement was subsequently accepted by the
Commission as the baseline agreement for
functional equivalency analyses of the Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign
Postal Operators 1 product. Docket No. CP2011–69,
Order Concerning an Additional Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreements with
Foreign Postal Operators 1 Negotiated Service
Agreement, September 7, 2011, at 5 (Order No. 840).
See also Notice at 7–9.
4 Notice at 3. See Docket No. CP2020–144, Order
Approving Additional Inbound Competitive MultiService Agreement with Foreign Postal Operator—
FY20–1, June 25, 2020, at 7 (Order No. 5565).
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Service’s filing is consistent with the
requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and 39
CFR 3035.105 and whether it is
functionally equivalent to the baseline
agreement included in the Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreements
with Foreign Postal Operators 1 product
(MC2010–34). Comments are due no
later than December 21, 2021. Public
portions of this filing can be accessed
via the Commission’s website
(www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Jennaca D.
Upperman to serve as an officer of the
Commission to represent the interests of
the general public in these proceedings
(Public Representative).
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2022–36 for consideration of the
matters raised in this docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Jennaca
D. Upperman is appointed to serve as
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
3. Comments are due no later than
December 21, 2021.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–27414 Filed 12–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–218, OMB Control No.
3235–0242]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Extension:
Rule 206(4)–3
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 241 (Monday, December 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71933-71934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27414]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2022-36; Order No. 6063]
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreements With Foreign Postal
Operators
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is acknowledging a recent filing by the Postal
Service that it has entered into the Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreement with Foreign Postal Operators (FPOs). This notice informs the
public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: December 21, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Summary of the FPO-USPS Agreement
[[Page 71934]]
FY22-2
III. Notice of Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On December 13, 2021, the Postal Service filed a notice with the
Commission pursuant to 39 CFR 3035.105 and Order No. 546,\1\ concerning
the inbound portions of an Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreement
with a Foreign Postal Operator (FPO) which the Postal Service seeks to
include within the Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreement with
Foreign Postal Operators 1 (MC2010-34 product).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Docket Nos. MC2010-34 and CP2010-95, Order Adding Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal Service
Operators 1 to the Competitive Product List and Approving Included
Agreement, September 29, 2010 (Order No. 546).
\2\ See Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing
Functionally Equivalent Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreement
with Foreign Postal Operator--FY22-2, December 13, 2021, at 1
(Notice). The Postal Service refers to the agreement as ``FPO-USPS
Agreement FY22-2.'' Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of the FPO-USPS Agreement FY22-2
The FPO-USPS Agreement FY22-2 is intended to become effective on
January 1, 2022, and will, unless terminated earlier, expire on
December 31, 2023. Except as otherwise agreed by contract, the FPO
exchanges mail with the Postal Service and applies the Universal Postal
Convention and Universal Postal Convention Regulations to those
exchanges. The competitive services offered by the Postal Service to
the FPO in FPO-USPS Agreement FY22-2 include rates for inbound parcels,
packets, and international Express Mail Service. Notice at 5-6. The
Postal Service states that ``[m]any rates will be based on a per-piece
and per-kilo structure and in Special Drawing Rights. . . .'' Id. at 6
(footnote omitted). Only the inbound portions of the FPO-USPS Agreement
FY22-2 that concern competitive products are included in the proposal
filed in this docket. Id. Outbound delivery of competitive postal
products within the FPO's country have not previously been presented to
the Commission and are not presented in this Notice. Id.
Accompanying the Notice are:
Attachment 1--an application for non-public treatment of
materials to maintain redacted portions of the agreement and supporting
documents under seal;
Attachment 2--a redacted copy of FPO-USPS Agreement FY22-
2;
Attachment 3--a copy of the Governors' Decision No. 19-1;
Attachment 4--a certified statement required by 39 CFR
3035.105(c)(2); and
Supporting financial documentation as separate Excel
files.
The Postal Service asserts that ``[t]he FPO-USPS Agreement FY22-2
is functionally equivalent to the baseline agreement filed in Docket
No. MC2010-34 because the terms of this agreement are similar in scope
and purpose to the terms of the CP2010-95 Agreement'' that is used for
functional equivalency analyses of the Inbound Competitive Multi-
Service Agreement with Foreign Postal Operators 1 product.'' \3\ The
Postal Service states that ``[b]ecause the FPO-USPS Agreement FY22-2
and the CP2010-95 Agreement incorporate the same cost attributes and
methodology, the relevant cost and market characteristics are
similar.'' Notice at 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Notice at 3. An agreement (the CP2010-95 Agreement) was
originally presented to the Commission in Docket No. CP2010-95 for
inclusion in the Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreements with
Foreign Postal Operators 1 product. Order No. 546 at 8-10. The
CP2010-95 Agreement was subsequently accepted by the Commission as
the baseline agreement for functional equivalency analyses of the
Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign Postal
Operators 1 product. Docket No. CP2011-69, Order Concerning an
Additional Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign
Postal Operators 1 Negotiated Service Agreement, September 7, 2011,
at 5 (Order No. 840). See also Notice at 7-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Postal Service asserts that the FPO-USPS
Agreement FY22-2 is in compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. The Postal
Service states further that the FPO-USPS Agreement FY22-2 is
essentially an updated version of the FPO-USPS Agreement FY20-1, which
was previously included in the Inbound Competitive Multi-Service
Agreements with Postal Operators 1 product.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Notice at 3. See Docket No. CP2020-144, Order Approving
Additional Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign
Postal Operator--FY20-1, June 25, 2020, at 7 (Order No. 5565).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service asserts that its proposed addition of FPO-USPS
Agreement FY22-2 to the Inbound Competitive Multi-Service Agreement
with Foreign Postal Operators 1 product is also supported by prior
Commission determinations that bilateral agreements with FPOs and
negotiated service agreements should be included in the Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreement with Foreign Postal Operators 1
product. Notice at 3-4.
III. Notice of Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2022-36 for consideration
of the Notice pertaining to FPO-USPS Agreement FY22-2 and the related
rates and classifications. The Commission invites comments on whether
the Postal Service's filing is consistent with the requirements of 39
U.S.C. 3633 and 39 CFR 3035.105 and whether it is functionally
equivalent to the baseline agreement included in the Inbound
Competitive Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators 1
product (MC2010-34). Comments are due no later than December 21, 2021.
Public portions of this filing can be accessed via the Commission's
website (www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Jennaca D. Upperman to serve as an officer
of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in
these proceedings (Public Representative).
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2022-36 for
consideration of the matters raised in this docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Jennaca D. Upperman is appointed to
serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent
the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
3. Comments are due no later than December 21, 2021.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-27414 Filed 12-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P