Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for Canelo Hills Ladies-Tresses, 71075-71077 [2021-27013]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 14, 2021 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7038–N–22]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Single Family Mortgage
Insurance on Hawaiian Home Lands,
OMB Control No.: 2502–0358
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: February
14, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; telephone 202–402–3400
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at Colette.Pollard@hud.gov for a copy of
the proposed forms or other available
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; email Colette Pollard at
Colette.Pollard@hud.gov or telephone
202–402–3400 (this is not a toll-free
number). Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339. Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Pollard.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Hawaiian Home Lands.
OMB Approval Number: 2502–0358.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Form Number: N/A.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Dec 13, 2021
Jkt 256001
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: FHA
offers mortgage insurance for mortgages
on single-family dwellings under Title II
of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C.
1701, et seq.). The Housing and Urban
Rural Recovery Act (HURRA), Public
Law 98–181, amended the National
Housing Act to add Section 247 (12
U.S.C. 1715z–12) to permit FHA to
insure mortgages for properties located
on Hawaiian Home Lands.
Section 247 requires that the
Department of Hawaiian Homelands
(DHHL) of the State of Hawaii (a) be a
co-mortgagor; (b) guarantee or reimburse
the Secretary for any mortgage
insurance claim paid in connection with
a property on Hawaiian Home Lands; or
(c) offer other security acceptable to the
Secretary. There are no changes to this
program for this submission.
Under Article XII of the Constitution
for the State of Hawaii, the DHHL is
responsible for management of
Hawaiian Home Lands for the benefit of
native Hawaiians. The DHHL
determines that the mortgagor meets its
eligibility requirement as a native
Hawaiian.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit (FHA-approved lenders).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
23.
Estimated Number of Responses: 606.
Frequency of Response: Monthly and
on occasion.
Average Hours per Response: 0.58.
Total Estimated Burdens: 99 hours.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (3) Ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond,; including through the
use of appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comments in response to these
questions.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71075
C. Authority
Section 2 of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507.
Janet M. Golrick,
Acting Chief of Staff for Housing.
[FR Doc. 2021–27000 Filed 12–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2021–0135;
FXES11130200000–212–FF02ENEH00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for
Canelo Hills Ladies-Tresses
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comment.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of our draft recovery plan
for Canelo Hills ladies-tresses
(Spiranthes delitescens), an endangered
orchid that occurs in desert wetland
habitats in southern Arizona. We
request review and comment on this
draft recovery plan from local, State,
and Federal agencies; Tribal
governments; nongovernmental
organizations; and the public.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on or before February 14, 2022.
Comments submitted online at https://
www.regulations.gov (see ADDRESSES)
must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on February 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may
obtain a copy of the draft recovery plan,
recovery implementation strategy, and
species status assessment for review at
https://www.regulations.gov in Docket
No. FWS–R2–ES–2021–0135.
Submitting Comments: Submit your
comments in writing by one of the
following methods:
• Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for and
submit comments on Docket No. FWS–
R2–ES–2021–0135.
• U.S. mail: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: Docket No. FWS–R2–
ES–2021–0135, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Headquarters, MS: PRB/3W,
5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA
22041–3803.
For additional information about
submitting comments, see Request for
Public Comments and Public
Availability of Comments under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
71076
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 14, 2021 / Notices
Jeff
Humphrey, Field Supervisor, at 928–
556–2157 or by email at Jeff_
Humphrey@fws.gov. Individuals who
are hearing or speech impaired may call
the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–
8339 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), announce the availability of
our draft recovery plan for Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses (Spiranthes delitescens),
which we listed as endangered in 1997
(62 FR 665) under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA;
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). This orchid
species is restricted to four populations
in cie´negas (desert wetlands) in Cochise
and Santa Cruz Counties in southern
Arizona. The draft recovery plan
includes specific goals, objectives, and
criteria that may help to inform our
consideration of whether to reclassify
the species as threatened (i.e.,
‘‘downlist’’) or remove the species from
the Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Plants (i.e., ‘‘delist’’). We
request review of and comment on the
draft recovery plan from local, State,
and Federal agencies; Tribal
governments; nongovernmental
organizations; and the public.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Recovery Planning and Implementation
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires the
development of recovery plans for listed
species, unless such a plan would not
promote the conservation of a particular
species. Also pursuant to section 4(f) of
the ESA, a recovery plan must, to the
maximum extent practicable, include:
(1) A description of site-specific
management actions as may be
necessary to achieve the plan’s goals for
the conservation and survival of the
species;
(2) Objective, measurable criteria that,
when met, would support a
determination under the ESA’s section
4(a)(1) that the species should be
delisted; and
(3) Estimates of the time and costs
required to carry out those measures
needed to achieve the plan’s goal and to
achieve intermediate steps toward that
goal.
In 2016 the USFWS revised its
approach to recovery planning, and is
now using a process termed recovery
planning and implementation (RPI) (see
https://www.fws.gov/endangered/esalibrary/pdf/RPI.pdf). The RPI approach
is intended to reduce the time needed
to develop and implement recovery
plans, increase recovery plan relevance
over a longer timeframe, and add
flexibility to recovery plans so they can
be adjusted to new information or
circumstances. Under RPI, a recovery
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Dec 13, 2021
Jkt 256001
plan addresses the statutorily required
elements under section 4(f) of the ESA,
including site-specific management
actions, objective and measurable
recovery criteria, and the estimated time
and cost to recovery. The RPI recovery
plan is supported by two supplementary
documents: A species status assessment
(SSA), which describes the best
available scientific information related
to the biological needs of the species
and assessment of threats, and the
recovery implementation strategy (RIS),
which details the particular near-term
activities needed to implement the
recovery actions identified in the
recovery plan. Under this approach, we
can more nimbly incorporate new
information on species biology or
details of recovery implementation by
updating these supplementary
documents without concurrent revision
of the entire recovery plan, unless
changes to statutorily required elements
are necessary.
Species Background
On January 6, 1997, we published a
final rule (62 FR 665) to list Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses as endangered without
critical habitat.
The species is known to occur in four
populations in southern Arizona: (1)
Canelo Hills, with one subpopulation on
land owned and managed by The Nature
Conservancy and another on U.S. Forest
Service land; the most recent
observation of the species here included
5 individuals counted in 2002; (2)
Turkey Creek, on private lands, where 6
individuals were counted in 2021; (3)
San Rafael Valley, on private lands,
where 80 plants were counted in 2021;
and (4) Babocomari, on private lands,
where the species was last observed in
2008.
There are no plants at botanical
gardens; however, in 2016 seed from a
single population was preserved, and in
late 2020 a proposal was funded to
begin in vitro propagation and
cultivation at the Desert Botanical
Garden in Phoenix, Arizona.
The primary ongoing threats to Canelo
Hills ladies-tresses include loss or
reduction of cie´nega (desert wetland)
habitat, herbivory or seed predation by
vertebrates and invertebrates, pollinator
decline, low numbers and limited
distribution, and drought and climate
change.
Recovery Criteria
The draft recovery criteria are
summarized below. For a complete
description of the rationale behind the
criteria, the recovery strategy,
management actions, and estimated
time and costs associated with recovery,
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
refer to the draft recovery plan for
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses (see
ADDRESSES, above, for document
availability).
The ultimate recovery goal is to delist
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses by ensuring
the long-term viability of the species in
the wild. In the recovery plan, we define
the following criteria for delisting (i.e.,
removal of the species from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Plants).
Delisting Criteria
Criterion 1: All four existing
populations (Canelo Hills, Turkey
Creek, San Rafael Valley, and
Babocomari) are viable, and at least
three new viable populations are
established in strategic sites. To be
considered viable, all seven populations
must contain a minimum of 100
individuals each, for a total of 25 years
over a 35-year period, as indicated by
annual monitoring, including during the
last two monitoring events. At least
three of these populations must contain
a minimum of two subpopulations
separated by less than 960 meters (the
distance a primary pollinator can
travel). In addition, two of the seven
populations must each contain a
minimum of 650 individuals on at least
two occasions during the 35-year period
mentioned above. Existing or newly
established populations may be
augmented for 5 out of the first 25 years
to achieve these numbers; no
augmentation can occur in the last 10
years of the 35-year period. All
populations must have documented
natural recruitment and not show more
than 10 percent loss of seed production
to herbivory or predation during two or
more monitoring events within the last
10 years of the 35-year period.
Criterion 2: A collection of seed
representing the geographical,
morphological, and genetic diversity of
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses is maintained
in multiple Center for Plant
Conservation partner botanical or seed
storage institutions for conservation
purposes.
Criterion 3: A living collection of
plants representing the geographical,
morphological, and genetic diversity of
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses is established
within 10 years and maintained in
perpetuity in multiple botanical
institutions for educational and
conservation purposes.
Criterion 4: Cie´negas supporting the
four populations of Canelo Hills ladiestresses (Canelo Hills, Turkey Creek, San
Rafael Valley, and Babocomari), plus
those cie´negas supporting at least three
newly established populations, are
protected in perpetuity through a
conservation easement, habitat
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 14, 2021 / Notices
conservation plan, or other conservation
mechanism appropriate to the land
status. In addition, conservation
easements or other conservation
mechanisms appropriate to the land
status are held on neighboring lands,
such that new developments (e.g.,
residential, agricultural, and
commercial) are minimized and do not
impact groundwater availability in the
cie´negas supporting Canelo Hills ladiestresses populations.
Criterion 5: In fulfillment of Criterion
4, above, conservation and management
programs and plans address the threats
of cie´nega habitat loss, direct loss of
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses, and
pollinator decline to ensure continued
existence of the species. The following
requirements must be met: (a) Sitespecific plans are developed and fully
implemented, such that competing
native and nonnative vegetation is
reduced to a level that ensures Canelo
Hills ladies-tresses is not shaded and
their vigor is not negatively affected; a
more natural fire or other disturbance
regime is maintained; natural spring
flow supporting cienegas is increased by
reducing water loss and increasing
water conservation and recharge; moist
soil cie´nega habitat is increased;
predation and herbivory are minimized;
and native plant diversity is maintained,
thus promoting native pollinators; and
(b) data on the conservation and
management of Canelo Hills ladiestresses are collected and shared between
land managers and researchers.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Peer Review
In accordance with our policy,
‘‘Notice of Interagency Cooperative
Policy for Peer Review in Endangered
Species Act Activities,’’ which we
published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR
34270), and our August 22, 2016,
Memorandum, ‘‘Peer Review Process,’’
we have sought the expert opinion of at
least three appropriate and independent
specialists regarding scientific data and
interpretations contained in the species
biological report and the draft recovery
plan. We have ensured that the opinions
of peer reviewers were objective and
unbiased by following the guidelines set
forth in the 2016 Memorandum, which
updates and clarifies our policy on peer
review. The purpose of such review was
to ensure that our decisions are based
on scientifically sound data,
assumptions, and analysis. We have
addressed peer review comments and
incorporated changes in the publicly
available version of the SSA and this
version of the draft recovery plan.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Dec 13, 2021
Jkt 256001
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires us to
provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and
comment during recovery plan
development. Substantive comments
may or may not result in changes to the
recovery plan. Comments regarding
recovery plan implementation will be
forwarded as appropriate to Federal or
other entities so that they can be taken
into account during the course of
implementation of recovery actions.
We invite written comments on this
draft recovery plan. In particular, we are
interested in additional information
regarding the current threats to the
species, ongoing beneficial management
efforts, and the costs associated with
implementing the recommended
recovery actions. We are specifically
seeking comments on the following
questions:
• Understanding that the time and
cost presented in the draft recovery plan
will be fine-tuned as the RIS is
implemented, are the estimated time
and cost to recovery presented here
realistic? Is the estimate reflective of the
time and cost of actions that may have
already been implemented by Federal,
State, county, or other agencies? If not,
please provide suggestions or methods
for determining a more accurate
estimation.
• Do the draft recovery criteria
provide clear direction to partners on
what is needed to recover Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses? How could they be
improved for clarity?
• Are the draft recovery criteria both
objective and measurable given the
information available for Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses? Please provide
suggestions.
• Understanding that specific,
detailed, and area-specific recovery
activities have been developed in the
RIS, do the draft recovery actions
presented in the draft recovery plan
generally cover the types of actions
necessary to meet the recovery criteria?
If not, what general actions are missing?
Are any of the draft recovery actions
unnecessary for achieving recovery?
Have we prioritized the actions
appropriately?
The SSA is available as a supporting
document for the draft recovery plan,
but we are not seeking comments on
that document. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date
specified in DATES, above, prior to final
approval of the plan.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments we receive, including
names and addresses, will become part
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71077
of the administrative record and will be
available to the public. Before including
your address, phone number, email
address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—will be
publicly available. While you may
request in your comment that we
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
We developed our draft recovery plan
and publish this notice under the
authority of section 4(f) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Amy Lueders,
Regional Director, Southwest Region, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–27013 Filed 12–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R7–SM–2021–N200; FF07J00000
FXRS12610700000 212]
Alaska Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council Meetings for 2022
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of meetings.
The Federal Subsistence
Board (Board) announces the public
meetings of the 10 Alaska Subsistence
Regional Advisory Councils (hereafter,
Councils) for the winter and fall cycles
of 2022. The 10 Councils each meet
approximately twice a year to provide
advice and recommendations to the
Board about subsistence hunting and
fishing issues on Federal public lands in
Alaska.
SUMMARY:
Winter 2022 Meetings: The
Alaska Subsistence Councils will meet
via teleconference between February 8,
2022, and March 24, 2022, as shown in
Table 1. For more information about
accessing the meetings, visit the
Councils’ website at https://
www.doi.gov/subsistence/regions.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71075-71077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27013]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R2-ES-2021-0135; FXES11130200000-212-FF02ENEH00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery
Plan for Canelo Hills Ladies-Tresses
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of our draft recovery plan for Canelo Hills ladies-tresses
(Spiranthes delitescens), an endangered orchid that occurs in desert
wetland habitats in southern Arizona. We request review and comment on
this draft recovery plan from local, State, and Federal agencies;
Tribal governments; nongovernmental organizations; and the public.
DATES: We must receive any comments on or before February 14, 2022.
Comments submitted online at https://www.regulations.gov (see ADDRESSES)
must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may obtain a copy of the draft recovery
plan, recovery implementation strategy, and species status assessment
for review at https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2021-
0135.
Submitting Comments: Submit your comments in writing by one of the
following methods:
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Search for and
submit comments on Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2021-0135.
U.S. mail: Public Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2021-0135, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters, MS:
PRB/3W, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
For additional information about submitting comments, see Request
for Public Comments and Public Availability of Comments under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
[[Page 71076]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Humphrey, Field Supervisor, at
928-556-2157 or by email at [email protected]. Individuals who are
hearing or speech impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-
877-8339 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), announce the availability of our draft recovery plan for
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses (Spiranthes delitescens), which we listed
as endangered in 1997 (62 FR 665) under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). This orchid species is
restricted to four populations in ci[eacute]negas (desert wetlands) in
Cochise and Santa Cruz Counties in southern Arizona. The draft recovery
plan includes specific goals, objectives, and criteria that may help to
inform our consideration of whether to reclassify the species as
threatened (i.e., ``downlist'') or remove the species from the Federal
List of Endangered and Threatened Plants (i.e., ``delist''). We request
review of and comment on the draft recovery plan from local, State, and
Federal agencies; Tribal governments; nongovernmental organizations;
and the public.
Recovery Planning and Implementation
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires the development of recovery plans
for listed species, unless such a plan would not promote the
conservation of a particular species. Also pursuant to section 4(f) of
the ESA, a recovery plan must, to the maximum extent practicable,
include:
(1) A description of site-specific management actions as may be
necessary to achieve the plan's goals for the conservation and survival
of the species;
(2) Objective, measurable criteria that, when met, would support a
determination under the ESA's section 4(a)(1) that the species should
be delisted; and
(3) Estimates of the time and costs required to carry out those
measures needed to achieve the plan's goal and to achieve intermediate
steps toward that goal.
In 2016 the USFWS revised its approach to recovery planning, and is
now using a process termed recovery planning and implementation (RPI)
(see https://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/RPI.pdf). The RPI
approach is intended to reduce the time needed to develop and implement
recovery plans, increase recovery plan relevance over a longer
timeframe, and add flexibility to recovery plans so they can be
adjusted to new information or circumstances. Under RPI, a recovery
plan addresses the statutorily required elements under section 4(f) of
the ESA, including site-specific management actions, objective and
measurable recovery criteria, and the estimated time and cost to
recovery. The RPI recovery plan is supported by two supplementary
documents: A species status assessment (SSA), which describes the best
available scientific information related to the biological needs of the
species and assessment of threats, and the recovery implementation
strategy (RIS), which details the particular near-term activities
needed to implement the recovery actions identified in the recovery
plan. Under this approach, we can more nimbly incorporate new
information on species biology or details of recovery implementation by
updating these supplementary documents without concurrent revision of
the entire recovery plan, unless changes to statutorily required
elements are necessary.
Species Background
On January 6, 1997, we published a final rule (62 FR 665) to list
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses as endangered without critical habitat.
The species is known to occur in four populations in southern
Arizona: (1) Canelo Hills, with one subpopulation on land owned and
managed by The Nature Conservancy and another on U.S. Forest Service
land; the most recent observation of the species here included 5
individuals counted in 2002; (2) Turkey Creek, on private lands, where
6 individuals were counted in 2021; (3) San Rafael Valley, on private
lands, where 80 plants were counted in 2021; and (4) Babocomari, on
private lands, where the species was last observed in 2008.
There are no plants at botanical gardens; however, in 2016 seed
from a single population was preserved, and in late 2020 a proposal was
funded to begin in vitro propagation and cultivation at the Desert
Botanical Garden in Phoenix, Arizona.
The primary ongoing threats to Canelo Hills ladies-tresses include
loss or reduction of ci[eacute]nega (desert wetland) habitat, herbivory
or seed predation by vertebrates and invertebrates, pollinator decline,
low numbers and limited distribution, and drought and climate change.
Recovery Criteria
The draft recovery criteria are summarized below. For a complete
description of the rationale behind the criteria, the recovery
strategy, management actions, and estimated time and costs associated
with recovery, refer to the draft recovery plan for Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses (see ADDRESSES, above, for document availability).
The ultimate recovery goal is to delist Canelo Hills ladies-tresses
by ensuring the long-term viability of the species in the wild. In the
recovery plan, we define the following criteria for delisting (i.e.,
removal of the species from the List of Endangered and Threatened
Plants).
Delisting Criteria
Criterion 1: All four existing populations (Canelo Hills, Turkey
Creek, San Rafael Valley, and Babocomari) are viable, and at least
three new viable populations are established in strategic sites. To be
considered viable, all seven populations must contain a minimum of 100
individuals each, for a total of 25 years over a 35-year period, as
indicated by annual monitoring, including during the last two
monitoring events. At least three of these populations must contain a
minimum of two subpopulations separated by less than 960 meters (the
distance a primary pollinator can travel). In addition, two of the
seven populations must each contain a minimum of 650 individuals on at
least two occasions during the 35-year period mentioned above. Existing
or newly established populations may be augmented for 5 out of the
first 25 years to achieve these numbers; no augmentation can occur in
the last 10 years of the 35-year period. All populations must have
documented natural recruitment and not show more than 10 percent loss
of seed production to herbivory or predation during two or more
monitoring events within the last 10 years of the 35-year period.
Criterion 2: A collection of seed representing the geographical,
morphological, and genetic diversity of Canelo Hills ladies-tresses is
maintained in multiple Center for Plant Conservation partner botanical
or seed storage institutions for conservation purposes.
Criterion 3: A living collection of plants representing the
geographical, morphological, and genetic diversity of Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses is established within 10 years and maintained in
perpetuity in multiple botanical institutions for educational and
conservation purposes.
Criterion 4: Ci[eacute]negas supporting the four populations of
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses (Canelo Hills, Turkey Creek, San Rafael
Valley, and Babocomari), plus those ci[eacute]negas supporting at least
three newly established populations, are protected in perpetuity
through a conservation easement, habitat
[[Page 71077]]
conservation plan, or other conservation mechanism appropriate to the
land status. In addition, conservation easements or other conservation
mechanisms appropriate to the land status are held on neighboring
lands, such that new developments (e.g., residential, agricultural, and
commercial) are minimized and do not impact groundwater availability in
the ci[eacute]negas supporting Canelo Hills ladies-tresses populations.
Criterion 5: In fulfillment of Criterion 4, above, conservation and
management programs and plans address the threats of ci[eacute]nega
habitat loss, direct loss of Canelo Hills ladies-tresses, and
pollinator decline to ensure continued existence of the species. The
following requirements must be met: (a) Site-specific plans are
developed and fully implemented, such that competing native and
nonnative vegetation is reduced to a level that ensures Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses is not shaded and their vigor is not negatively
affected; a more natural fire or other disturbance regime is
maintained; natural spring flow supporting cienegas is increased by
reducing water loss and increasing water conservation and recharge;
moist soil ci[eacute]nega habitat is increased; predation and herbivory
are minimized; and native plant diversity is maintained, thus promoting
native pollinators; and (b) data on the conservation and management of
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses are collected and shared between land
managers and researchers.
Peer Review
In accordance with our policy, ``Notice of Interagency Cooperative
Policy for Peer Review in Endangered Species Act Activities,'' which we
published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR 34270), and our August 22, 2016,
Memorandum, ``Peer Review Process,'' we have sought the expert opinion
of at least three appropriate and independent specialists regarding
scientific data and interpretations contained in the species biological
report and the draft recovery plan. We have ensured that the opinions
of peer reviewers were objective and unbiased by following the
guidelines set forth in the 2016 Memorandum, which updates and
clarifies our policy on peer review. The purpose of such review was to
ensure that our decisions are based on scientifically sound data,
assumptions, and analysis. We have addressed peer review comments and
incorporated changes in the publicly available version of the SSA and
this version of the draft recovery plan.
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires us to provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and comment during recovery plan
development. Substantive comments may or may not result in changes to
the recovery plan. Comments regarding recovery plan implementation will
be forwarded as appropriate to Federal or other entities so that they
can be taken into account during the course of implementation of
recovery actions.
We invite written comments on this draft recovery plan. In
particular, we are interested in additional information regarding the
current threats to the species, ongoing beneficial management efforts,
and the costs associated with implementing the recommended recovery
actions. We are specifically seeking comments on the following
questions:
Understanding that the time and cost presented in the
draft recovery plan will be fine-tuned as the RIS is implemented, are
the estimated time and cost to recovery presented here realistic? Is
the estimate reflective of the time and cost of actions that may have
already been implemented by Federal, State, county, or other agencies?
If not, please provide suggestions or methods for determining a more
accurate estimation.
Do the draft recovery criteria provide clear direction to
partners on what is needed to recover Canelo Hills ladies-tresses? How
could they be improved for clarity?
Are the draft recovery criteria both objective and
measurable given the information available for Canelo Hills ladies-
tresses? Please provide suggestions.
Understanding that specific, detailed, and area-specific
recovery activities have been developed in the RIS, do the draft
recovery actions presented in the draft recovery plan generally cover
the types of actions necessary to meet the recovery criteria? If not,
what general actions are missing? Are any of the draft recovery actions
unnecessary for achieving recovery? Have we prioritized the actions
appropriately?
The SSA is available as a supporting document for the draft
recovery plan, but we are not seeking comments on that document. We
will consider all comments we receive by the date specified in DATES,
above, prior to final approval of the plan.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments we receive, including names and addresses, will become
part of the administrative record and will be available to the public.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--will be publicly available. While you may request in your
comment that we withhold your personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority
We developed our draft recovery plan and publish this notice under
the authority of section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Amy Lueders,
Regional Director, Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-27013 Filed 12-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P