Notice of Opportunity To Comment on Proposed Denial of Petitions for Small Refinery Exemptions, 70999-71000 [2021-26983]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 14, 2021 / Proposed Rules
emissions statements requirements for
the 2015 ozone NAAQS. We will accept
comments from the public on this
proposal until January 13, 2022. If we
take final action to approve the
submitted rules, our final action will
incorporate these rules into the federally
enforceable SIP.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the rules described in Table 1 of this
preamble. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Dec 13, 2021
Jkt 256001
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 7, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2021–27018 Filed 12–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 80
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2021–0566; FRL–9090–01–
OAR]
Notice of Opportunity To Comment on
Proposed Denial of Petitions for Small
Refinery Exemptions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed denial of petitions.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to deny all
undecided/pending small refinery
exemption petitions under the
Renewable Fuel Standard program
currently before the agency. EPA is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70999
providing an opportunity for the public
to comment on our proposed denial of
these petitions.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 7, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Comments. You may send
your comments, identified by Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2021–0566, by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method) Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
• Email: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov.
Include Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–
2021–0566 in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center,
Air Docket, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery or Courier (by
scheduled appointment only): EPA
Docket Center, WJC West Building,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Docket
Center’s hours of operations are 8:30
a.m.–4:30 p.m., Monday–Friday (except
Federal Holidays).
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received may be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Out of an abundance of caution for
members of the public and our staff, the
EPA Docket Center and Reading Room
are closed to the public, with limited
exceptions, to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID–19. Our Docket
Center staff will continue to provide
remote customer service via email,
phone, and webform. We encourage the
public to submit comments via https://
www.regulations.gov or email, as there
may be a delay in processing mail and
faxes. Hand deliveries and couriers may
be received by scheduled appointment
only. For further information on EPA
Docket Center services and the current
status, please visit us online at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
EPA continues to carefully and
continuously monitor information from
the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), local area health
departments, and our Federal partners
so that we can respond rapidly as
conditions change regarding COVID–19.
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
71000
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 14, 2021 / Proposed Rules
II. Proposed Decision
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Nelson, Office of Transportation
and Air Quality, Compliance Division,
Environmental Protection Agency, 2000
Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI
48105; telephone number: 734–214–
4657; email address: nelson.karen@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
The Clean Air Act (CAA) provides
that a small refinery 1 may at any time
petition EPA for an exemption from the
obligations of the Renewable Fuel
Standard (RFS) program for the reason
of disproportionate economic hardship
(DEH).2 In evaluating such petitions, the
EPA Administrator, in consultation with
the Secretary of Energy, will consider
the findings of a Department of Energy
(DOE) study and other economic
factors.3
The CAA provided an initial blanket
small refinery exemption (SRE) to all
small refineries, exempting them from
their RFS obligations until calendar year
2011.4 The CAA includes two
additional provisions regarding
extensions of the temporary exemption
for the period after the initial blanket
exemption expired. The first statutory
mechanism, applicable to 2011 and
2012, was based on a DOE
determination, through the abovementioned study, that compliance with
the RFS requirements would impose
DEH on a small refinery. If DOE made
such a determination, EPA was required
to extend the small refinery’s exemption
for no less than two years.5 Under the
second statutory mechanism, small
refineries are authorized to petition at
any time for extensions of the original
statutory exemption for the reason of
DEH.6 Since 2013, EPA has shared the
incoming petitions and supporting
information with DOE, and DOE has
provided EPA with its findings based on
a scoring matrix; however, the ultimate
decision of whether to grant or deny a
petition rests with EPA.7
1 The CAA defines a small refinery as ‘‘a refinery
for which the average aggregate daily crude oil
throughput for a calendar year . . . does not exceed
75,000 barrels.’’ CAA section 211(o)(1)(K).
2 CAA section 211(o)(9)(B)(i).
3 CAA section 211(o)(9)(B)(ii).
4 CAA section 211(o)(9)(A)(i).
5 CAA section 211(o)(9)(A)(ii)(II).
6 CAA section 211(o)(9)(B)(i).
7 More information on the RFS program and the
history of SREs, including how EPA’s approach to
evaluating SRE petitions has changed over time, can
be found in Section II of the ‘‘Proposed RFS Small
Refinery Exemption Decision,’’ available in the
docket for this action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Dec 13, 2021
Jkt 256001
In the Proposed RFS Small Refinery
Exemption Decision (hereinafter ‘‘the
proposed adjudication,’’ available in the
docket for this action (Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2021–0566) and on
EPA’s website at https://www.epa.gov/
renewable-fuel-standard-program/
proposal-deny-petitions-small-refineryexemptions), we have conducted an
extensive analysis and review of
information provided by small refineries
in their SRE petitions to EPA, finding
that all refineries face the same costs to
acquire RINs regardless of whether the
RINs are created through the act of
blending renewable fuels or purchased
on the open market. This happens
because the market price for these fuels
increases to reflect the cost of the RIN,
much as it would increase in response
to higher crude prices. In other words,
this increased price for gasoline and
diesel fuel allows obligated parties to
recover their RIN costs through the
market price of the fuel they produce.
Because the market behaves this way for
all parties subject to the RFS, there is no
disproportionate cost to any party,
including small refineries. As a result,
we conclude that small refineries do not
face DEH.
Given this conclusion and the other
reasons described in the proposed
adjudication, we are proposing to deny
all pending SRE petitions by finding the
petitioning refineries do not face DEH
caused by compliance with their RFS
obligations. We seek comment on all
aspects of this proposed denial, most
notably on our conclusions that the
CAA requires small refineries to
demonstrate that DEH is caused by
compliance with the RFS program and
our economic analyses concluding that
no small refineries face such
disproportionate costs of compliance
due to the RFS program. Specifically,
we seek comment on our findings
regarding the absence of a causal
relationship between compliance with
the RFS program and DEH experienced
by small refineries. We request
additional data that would show the
relationship between RFS compliance
costs and the price of transportation fuel
blendstocks. We also seek comment on
our proposed change in approach to
SRE eligibility based on receipt of the
original statutory exemption, and our
decision to deny all pending/undecided
SRE petitions based on the proportional
nature of the RFS requirements and our
findings regarding RIN cost
passthrough. We intend to consider
these comments before making a final
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determination on these pending
petitions.
Joseph Goffman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2021–26983 Filed 12–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 171
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0831; FRL–9134–01–
OCSPP]
RIN 2070–AL00
Notification of Submission to the
Secretary of Agriculture; Pesticides;
Certification of Pesticide Applicators;
Extension to Expiration Date of
Certification Plans
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notification of submission to
the Secretary of Agriculture.
AGENCY:
This document notifies the
public as required by the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) that the EPA Administrator
has forwarded to the Secretary of the
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) a draft regulatory document
concerning ‘‘Pesticides; Certification of
Pesticide Applicators; Extension to
Expiration Date of Certification Plans
(RIN 2070–AL00).’’ The draft regulatory
document is not available to the public
until after it has been signed and made
available by EPA.
DATES: See Unit I. under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0831, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
That docket contains historical
information and this Federal Register
document; it does not contain the draft
final rule.
Please note that due to the public
health concerns related to COVID–19,
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) and
Reading Room is open by appointment
only. The staff continues to provide
remote customer service via email,
phone, and webform. For the latest
status information on EPA/DC services
and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Schroeder, Pesticide ReEvaluation Division (7508P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 14, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70999-71000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26983]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 80
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0566; FRL-9090-01-OAR]
Notice of Opportunity To Comment on Proposed Denial of Petitions
for Small Refinery Exemptions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed denial of petitions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to deny
all undecided/pending small refinery exemption petitions under the
Renewable Fuel Standard program currently before the agency. EPA is
providing an opportunity for the public to comment on our proposed
denial of these petitions.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 7, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Comments. You may send your comments, identified by Docket
ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0566, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov
(our preferred method) Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OAR-2021-0566 in the subject line of the message.
Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center, Air Docket, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460.
Hand Delivery or Courier (by scheduled appointment only):
EPA Docket Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Docket Center's hours of
operations are 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., Monday-Friday (except Federal
Holidays).
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received may be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI
or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our
staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room are closed to the public,
with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19.
Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. We encourage the public to
submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov or email, as there may
be a delay in processing mail and faxes. Hand deliveries and couriers
may be received by scheduled appointment only. For further information
on EPA Docket Center services and the current status, please visit us
online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), local area
health departments, and our Federal partners so that we can respond
rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID-19.
[[Page 71000]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Nelson, Office of Transportation
and Air Quality, Compliance Division, Environmental Protection Agency,
2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; telephone number: 734-214-
4657; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Clean Air Act (CAA) provides that a small refinery \1\ may at
any time petition EPA for an exemption from the obligations of the
Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program for the reason of
disproportionate economic hardship (DEH).\2\ In evaluating such
petitions, the EPA Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of
Energy, will consider the findings of a Department of Energy (DOE)
study and other economic factors.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The CAA defines a small refinery as ``a refinery for which
the average aggregate daily crude oil throughput for a calendar year
. . . does not exceed 75,000 barrels.'' CAA section 211(o)(1)(K).
\2\ CAA section 211(o)(9)(B)(i).
\3\ CAA section 211(o)(9)(B)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAA provided an initial blanket small refinery exemption (SRE)
to all small refineries, exempting them from their RFS obligations
until calendar year 2011.\4\ The CAA includes two additional provisions
regarding extensions of the temporary exemption for the period after
the initial blanket exemption expired. The first statutory mechanism,
applicable to 2011 and 2012, was based on a DOE determination, through
the above-mentioned study, that compliance with the RFS requirements
would impose DEH on a small refinery. If DOE made such a determination,
EPA was required to extend the small refinery's exemption for no less
than two years.\5\ Under the second statutory mechanism, small
refineries are authorized to petition at any time for extensions of the
original statutory exemption for the reason of DEH.\6\ Since 2013, EPA
has shared the incoming petitions and supporting information with DOE,
and DOE has provided EPA with its findings based on a scoring matrix;
however, the ultimate decision of whether to grant or deny a petition
rests with EPA.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ CAA section 211(o)(9)(A)(i).
\5\ CAA section 211(o)(9)(A)(ii)(II).
\6\ CAA section 211(o)(9)(B)(i).
\7\ More information on the RFS program and the history of SREs,
including how EPA's approach to evaluating SRE petitions has changed
over time, can be found in Section II of the ``Proposed RFS Small
Refinery Exemption Decision,'' available in the docket for this
action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Proposed Decision
In the Proposed RFS Small Refinery Exemption Decision (hereinafter
``the proposed adjudication,'' available in the docket for this action
(Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0566) and on EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program/proposal-deny-petitions-small-refinery-exemptions), we have conducted an extensive analysis and
review of information provided by small refineries in their SRE
petitions to EPA, finding that all refineries face the same costs to
acquire RINs regardless of whether the RINs are created through the act
of blending renewable fuels or purchased on the open market. This
happens because the market price for these fuels increases to reflect
the cost of the RIN, much as it would increase in response to higher
crude prices. In other words, this increased price for gasoline and
diesel fuel allows obligated parties to recover their RIN costs through
the market price of the fuel they produce. Because the market behaves
this way for all parties subject to the RFS, there is no
disproportionate cost to any party, including small refineries. As a
result, we conclude that small refineries do not face DEH.
Given this conclusion and the other reasons described in the
proposed adjudication, we are proposing to deny all pending SRE
petitions by finding the petitioning refineries do not face DEH caused
by compliance with their RFS obligations. We seek comment on all
aspects of this proposed denial, most notably on our conclusions that
the CAA requires small refineries to demonstrate that DEH is caused by
compliance with the RFS program and our economic analyses concluding
that no small refineries face such disproportionate costs of compliance
due to the RFS program. Specifically, we seek comment on our findings
regarding the absence of a causal relationship between compliance with
the RFS program and DEH experienced by small refineries. We request
additional data that would show the relationship between RFS compliance
costs and the price of transportation fuel blendstocks. We also seek
comment on our proposed change in approach to SRE eligibility based on
receipt of the original statutory exemption, and our decision to deny
all pending/undecided SRE petitions based on the proportional nature of
the RFS requirements and our findings regarding RIN cost passthrough.
We intend to consider these comments before making a final
determination on these pending petitions.
Joseph Goffman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2021-26983 Filed 12-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P