Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, 70375-70377 [2021-26740]

Download as PDF jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 235 / Friday, December 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations for use with wound dressings classified under § 878.4780. This classification does not include devices intended for organ space wounds. (b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: (1) Clinical data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and evaluate the following: (i) Wound complication rates; and (ii) All adverse events. (2) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. (3) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the patientcontacting components of the device. (4) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the labeled shelf life. (5) Usability testing must demonstrate that intended users can correctly use the device, based solely on reading the instructions for use. (6) Non-clinical performance data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested in a worst-case scenario for the intended use life: (i) Ability to maintain pressure levels at the wound site under a worst-case scenario for the intended use life; (ii) Fluid removal rate consistent with the wound types specified in the indications for use; and (iii) Timely triggering of all alarms. (7) Performance data must demonstrate the electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of the device. (8) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed. (9) Labeling must include the following: (i) Instructions for use; (ii) A summary of the device technical specifications, including pressure settings, modes (e.g., continuous or intermittent), alarms, and safety features; (iii) Compatible components and devices; (iv) A summary of the clinical evidence for the indications for use; (v) A shelf life for sterile components; and (vi) Use life and intended use environments. (10) For devices intended for use outside of a healthcare facility, patient labeling must include the following: (i) Information on how to operate the device and its components and the typical course of treatment; VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Dec 09, 2021 Jkt 256001 (ii) Information on when to contact a healthcare professional; and (iii) Use life. Dated: December 6, 2021. Lauren K. Roth, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2021–26741 Filed 12–9–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 882 [Docket No. FDA–2021–N–0595] Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Final amendment; final order. AGENCY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is classifying the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for ADHD’s classification. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients’ access to beneficial innovative devices. DATES: This order is effective December 10, 2021. The classification was applicable on April 19, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Scott, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4208, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5433, PamelaD.Scott@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Background Upon request, FDA has classified the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for ADHD as class II (special controls), which we have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 70375 patients’ access to beneficial innovation, by placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic class III assignment. The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ‘‘postamendments devices’’ because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807). FDA may also classify a device through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105– 115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor may utilize either procedure for De Novo classification. Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 513(f)(2). Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) and then a request for classification, if the person determines that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM 10DER1 70376 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 235 / Friday, December 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The classification will be according to the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the initial classification of the device. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request or premarket approval application to market a substantially equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device. II. De Novo Classification On July 30, 2018, NeuroSigma, Inc. submitted a request for De Novo classification of the Monarch eTNS System. FDA reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. Therefore, on April 19, 2019, FDA issued an order to the requester classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 882.5898.1 We have named the generic type of device transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for ADHD, and it is identified as a prescription device that stimulates transcutaneously or percutaneously through electrodes placed on the forehead. FDA has identified the following risks to health associated specifically with this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks in table 1. TABLE 1—TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATOR FOR ADHD RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Identified risks Mitigation measures Adverse tissue reaction ...................................................... Injury or discomfort from electrical stimulation, including burns and nerve damage. Biocompatibility evaluation. Electromagnetic compatibility testing; Electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety testing; Non-clinical performance testing; Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis; Shelf life testing; and Labeling. Labeling. jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1 Misuse that may result in device failure, user discomfort, or injury. Skin irritation or infection from use on broken skin ........... Labeling. FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act. At the time of classification, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators for ADHD are for prescription use only. Prescription devices are exempt from the requirement for adequate directions for use for the layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met (referring to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)). III. Analysis of Environmental Impact The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. 1 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made to indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of Federal Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44 VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Dec 09, 2021 Jkt 256001 IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This final order establishes special controls that refer to previously approved collections of information found in other FDA regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The collections of information in the guidance document ‘‘De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have been approved under OMB control number 0910–0844; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814, PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 subparts A through E, regarding premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910–0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB control number 0910–0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 820, regarding quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB control number 0910–0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control number 0910–0485. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882 Medical devices. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 882 is amended as follows: U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook. E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM 10DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 235 / Friday, December 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations PART 882—NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES 1. The authority citation for part 882 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371. 2. Add § 882.5898 to subpart F to read as follows: ■ jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1 § 882.5898 Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. 15:55 Dec 09, 2021 Jkt 256001 Dated: December 6, 2021. Lauren K. Roth, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2021–26740 Filed 12–9–21; 8:45 am] (a) Identification. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prescription device that stimulates transcutaneously or percutaneously through electrodes placed on the forehead. (b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: (1) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. (2) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety of the device. (3) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following must be performed: (i) Electrical performance testing must validate electrical output and duration of stimulation; (ii) Battery performance testing must be performed; and (iii) Adhesive integrity testing of the electrodes must be conducted. (4) The technical parameters of the device including waveform, maximum output current and voltage, pulse duration, frequency, net charge per pulse, maximum current density, maximum average current, and maximum average power density must be fully characterized. (5) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed. (6) Shelf life testing of the electrodes must be performed to demonstrate continued package integrity and component functionality over the labeled shelf life. (7) Labeling must include the following: (i) A contraindication for patients with an implanted metallic or electronic device in the head, a cardiac pacemaker, or an implanted or wearable defibrillator; (ii) A warning that the device is only for use on clean, intact skin; (iii) Information on how the device operates and the typical sensations experienced during treatment; VerDate Sep<11>2014 (iv) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters; (v) A shelf life for the electrodes; (vi) Instructions for use, including placement of the device on the patient; and (vii) Cleaning instructions. BILLING CODE 4164–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket No. USCG–2021–0866] Safety Zone; Sacramento New Year’s Eve Fireworks, Sacramento River, Sacramento, CA Coast Guard, DHS. Notification of enforcement of regulation. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard will enforce the three safety zones in the navigable waters of the Sacramento River near River Walk Park and the Tower Bridge in Sacramento, CA in support of the Sacramento New Year’s Eve Fireworks in the Captain of the Port, San Francisco area of responsibility on December 31, 2021. This action is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from the dangers associated with pyrotechnics. During the enforcement periods noted below, unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring in the safety zone, unless authorized by the Patrol Commander (PATCOM) or other federal, state, or local law enforcement agencies on scene to assist the Coast Guard in enforcing the regulated area. DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR 165.1191, will be enforced for the location in Table 1 to § 165.1191, Item number 25, from 8:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on December 31, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this notification of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Anthony Solares, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone (415) 399–3585, email SFWaterways@ uscg.mil. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zones established in 33 CFR 165.1191 Table 1, PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 Item number 25, for the Sacramento New Year’s Eve Fireworks Display from 8:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on December 31, 2021, or as announcement via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The safety zone will extend to all three safety zones established in 33 CFR 165.1191 Table 1, Item number 25. During the period of enforcement, the three safety zones for the Sacramento New Year’s Eve Fireworks Display will encompass the navigable waters, from surface to bottom, around the fireworks firing sites within three respective circles each with a radius of 700 feet with the respective circle centers in approximate positions: Southern Firing Site at 38°34′50.00″ N 121°30′29.20″ W, Northern Firing Site at 38°35′02.07″ N 121°30′39.73″ W, and Near the Tower Bridge at 34°34′49.43″ N 121°30′29.19″ W (NAD83). Coast Guard SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 70377 The safety zones will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on December 31, 2021, or as announced via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. In addition to this notification in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of the safety zone and its enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners. Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1191, unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring in the safety zone during all applicable effective dates and times, unless authorized to do so by the PATCOM or other Official Patrol defined as a federal, state, or local law enforcement agency on scene to assist the Coast Guard in enforcing the regulated area. Additionally, each person who receives notice of a lawful order or direction issued by the PATCOM or Official Patrol shall obey the order or direction. The PATCOM or Official Patrol may, upon request, allow the transit of commercial vessels through regulated areas when it is safe to do so. If the Captain of the Port determines that the regulated area need not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, a Broadcast Notice to Mariners may be used to grant general permission to enter the regulated area. Dated: December 6, 2021. Taylor Q. Lam, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Francisco. [FR Doc. 2021–26792 Filed 12–9–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM 10DER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 235 (Friday, December 10, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70375-70377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26740]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 882

[Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0595]


Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the 
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Attention Deficit 
Hyperactivity Disorder

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human 
Services (HHS).

ACTION: Final amendment; final order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is 
classifying the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for 
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) into class II (special 
controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are 
identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for 
the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for ADHD's 
classification. We are taking this action because we have determined 
that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will 
provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the 
device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to 
beneficial innovative devices.

DATES: This order is effective December 10, 2021. The classification 
was applicable on April 19, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Scott, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4208, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5433, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Upon request, FDA has classified the transcutaneous electrical 
nerve stimulator for ADHD as class II (special controls), which we have 
determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance 
patients' access to beneficial innovation, by placing the device into a 
lower device class than the automatic class III assignment.
    The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law 
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by 
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution 
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains 
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA 
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C. 
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices'' 
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of 
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
    FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to 
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an 
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that 
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device 
is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the procedures 
for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 
U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
    FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification, 
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the 
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization 
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification 
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration 
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by 
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may 
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
    Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device 
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from 
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of 
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 
513(f)(2).
    Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) 
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that 
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination 
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under 
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.

[[Page 70376]]

    Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required 
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The 
classification will be according to the criteria under section 
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed 
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the 
initial classification of the device.
    When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo 
process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that 
type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a 
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request 
or premarket approval application to market a substantially equivalent 
device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial equivalence''). 
Instead, sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when 
necessary, to market their device.

II. De Novo Classification

    On July 30, 2018, NeuroSigma, Inc. submitted a request for De Novo 
classification of the Monarch eTNS System. FDA reviewed the request in 
order to classify the device under the criteria for classification set 
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
    We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves 
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special 
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide 
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for 
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the 
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can 
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. 
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the 
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the device.
    Therefore, on April 19, 2019, FDA issued an order to the requester 
classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is 
codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 
882.5898.\1\ We have named the generic type of device transcutaneous 
electrical nerve stimulator for ADHD, and it is identified as a 
prescription device that stimulates transcutaneously or percutaneously 
through electrodes placed on the forehead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order 
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final 
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made 
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal 
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of 
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act 
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and 
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has identified the following risks to health associated 
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to 
mitigate these risks in table 1.

 Table 1--Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for ADHD Risks and
                           Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Identified risks                    Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adverse tissue reaction...........  Biocompatibility evaluation.
Injury or discomfort from           Electromagnetic compatibility
 electrical stimulation, including   testing; Electrical, mechanical,
 burns and nerve damage.             and thermal safety testing; Non-
                                     clinical performance testing;
                                     Software verification, validation,
                                     and hazard analysis; Shelf life
                                     testing; and Labeling.
Misuse that may result in device    Labeling.
 failure, user discomfort, or
 injury.
Skin irritation or infection from   Labeling.
 use on broken skin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the 
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable 
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this 
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, 
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final 
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified 
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification 
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
    At the time of classification, transcutaneous electrical nerve 
stimulators for ADHD are for prescription use only. Prescription 
devices are exempt from the requirement for adequate directions for use 
for the layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR 
801.5, as long as the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met (referring 
to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).

III. Analysis of Environmental Impact

    The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final order establishes special controls that refer to 
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA 
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject 
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections 
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification 
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been 
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of 
information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding 
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding 
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB 
control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 
820, regarding quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB 
control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR 
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control 
number 0910-0485.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882

    Medical devices.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and 
under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR 
part 882 is amended as follows:

[[Page 70377]]

PART 882--NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 882 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.


0
2. Add Sec.  882.5898 to subpart F to read as follows:


Sec.  882.5898  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for 
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

    (a) Identification. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator 
for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prescription 
device that stimulates transcutaneously or percutaneously through 
electrodes placed on the forehead.
    (b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special 
controls for this device are:
    (1) The patient-contacting components of the device must be 
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
    (2) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic 
compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety of the 
device.
    (3) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the 
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The 
following must be performed:
    (i) Electrical performance testing must validate electrical output 
and duration of stimulation;
    (ii) Battery performance testing must be performed; and
    (iii) Adhesive integrity testing of the electrodes must be 
conducted.
    (4) The technical parameters of the device including waveform, 
maximum output current and voltage, pulse duration, frequency, net 
charge per pulse, maximum current density, maximum average current, and 
maximum average power density must be fully characterized.
    (5) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be 
performed.
    (6) Shelf life testing of the electrodes must be performed to 
demonstrate continued package integrity and component functionality 
over the labeled shelf life.
    (7) Labeling must include the following:
    (i) A contraindication for patients with an implanted metallic or 
electronic device in the head, a cardiac pacemaker, or an implanted or 
wearable defibrillator;
    (ii) A warning that the device is only for use on clean, intact 
skin;
    (iii) Information on how the device operates and the typical 
sensations experienced during treatment;
    (iv) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters;
    (v) A shelf life for the electrodes;
    (vi) Instructions for use, including placement of the device on the 
patient; and
    (vii) Cleaning instructions.

    Dated: December 6, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-26740 Filed 12-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.