Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, 70375-70377 [2021-26740]
Download as PDF
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 235 / Friday, December 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
for use with wound dressings classified
under § 878.4780. This classification
does not include devices intended for
organ space wounds.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Clinical data must demonstrate
that the device performs as intended
under anticipated conditions of use and
evaluate the following:
(i) Wound complication rates; and
(ii) All adverse events.
(2) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(3) Performance data must
demonstrate the sterility of the patientcontacting components of the device.
(4) Performance data must support the
shelf life of the device by demonstrating
continued sterility, package integrity,
and device functionality over the
labeled shelf life.
(5) Usability testing must demonstrate
that intended users can correctly use the
device, based solely on reading the
instructions for use.
(6) Non-clinical performance data
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be
tested in a worst-case scenario for the
intended use life:
(i) Ability to maintain pressure levels
at the wound site under a worst-case
scenario for the intended use life;
(ii) Fluid removal rate consistent with
the wound types specified in the
indications for use; and
(iii) Timely triggering of all alarms.
(7) Performance data must
demonstrate the electrical safety and
electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of
the device.
(8) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
(9) Labeling must include the
following:
(i) Instructions for use;
(ii) A summary of the device technical
specifications, including pressure
settings, modes (e.g., continuous or
intermittent), alarms, and safety
features;
(iii) Compatible components and
devices;
(iv) A summary of the clinical
evidence for the indications for use;
(v) A shelf life for sterile components;
and
(vi) Use life and intended use
environments.
(10) For devices intended for use
outside of a healthcare facility, patient
labeling must include the following:
(i) Information on how to operate the
device and its components and the
typical course of treatment;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 09, 2021
Jkt 256001
(ii) Information on when to contact a
healthcare professional; and
(iii) Use life.
Dated: December 6, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–26741 Filed 12–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA–2021–N–0595]
Medical Devices; Neurological
Devices; Classification of the
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve
Stimulator for Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder
Food and Drug Administration,
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
AGENCY:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is classifying the transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator for attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator for ADHD’s classification. We
are taking this action because we have
determined that classifying the device
into class II (special controls) will
provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness of the device. We
believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices.
DATES: This order is effective December
10, 2021. The classification was
applicable on April 19, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela Scott, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4208, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5433,
PamelaD.Scott@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator for ADHD as class II (special
controls), which we have determined
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness. In addition, we
believe this action will enhance
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70375
patients’ access to beneficial innovation,
by placing the device into a lower
device class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
10DER1
70376
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 235 / Friday, December 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)).
As a result, other device sponsors do not
have to submit a De Novo request or
premarket approval application to
market a substantially equivalent device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining
‘‘substantial equivalence’’). Instead,
sponsors can use the less-burdensome
510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On July 30, 2018, NeuroSigma, Inc.
submitted a request for De Novo
classification of the Monarch eTNS
System. FDA reviewed the request in
order to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on April 19, 2019, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 882.5898.1 We have named the
generic type of device transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator for ADHD,
and it is identified as a prescription
device that stimulates transcutaneously
or percutaneously through electrodes
placed on the forehead.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
TABLE 1—TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATOR FOR ADHD RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Adverse tissue reaction ......................................................
Injury or discomfort from electrical stimulation, including
burns and nerve damage.
Biocompatibility evaluation.
Electromagnetic compatibility testing; Electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety testing; Non-clinical performance testing; Software verification, validation, and hazard
analysis; Shelf life testing; and Labeling.
Labeling.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Misuse that may result in device failure, user discomfort,
or injury.
Skin irritation or infection from use on broken skin ...........
Labeling.
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification,
transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulators for ADHD are for
prescription use only. Prescription
devices are exempt from the
requirement for adequate directions for
use for the layperson under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR
801.5, as long as the conditions of 21
CFR 801.109 are met (referring to 21
U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
1 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 09, 2021
Jkt 256001
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 882 is
amended as follows:
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
10DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 235 / Friday, December 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
PART 882—NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 882
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 882.5898 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
§ 882.5898 Transcutaneous electrical
nerve stimulator for attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder.
15:55 Dec 09, 2021
Jkt 256001
Dated: December 6, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–26740 Filed 12–9–21; 8:45 am]
(a) Identification. A transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator for attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is
a prescription device that stimulates
transcutaneously or percutaneously
through electrodes placed on the
forehead.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Performance testing must
demonstrate the electromagnetic
compatibility and electrical,
mechanical, and thermal safety of the
device.
(3) Non-clinical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following must
be performed:
(i) Electrical performance testing must
validate electrical output and duration
of stimulation;
(ii) Battery performance testing must
be performed; and
(iii) Adhesive integrity testing of the
electrodes must be conducted.
(4) The technical parameters of the
device including waveform, maximum
output current and voltage, pulse
duration, frequency, net charge per
pulse, maximum current density,
maximum average current, and
maximum average power density must
be fully characterized.
(5) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
(6) Shelf life testing of the electrodes
must be performed to demonstrate
continued package integrity and
component functionality over the
labeled shelf life.
(7) Labeling must include the
following:
(i) A contraindication for patients
with an implanted metallic or electronic
device in the head, a cardiac pacemaker,
or an implanted or wearable
defibrillator;
(ii) A warning that the device is only
for use on clean, intact skin;
(iii) Information on how the device
operates and the typical sensations
experienced during treatment;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(iv) A detailed summary of the device
technical parameters;
(v) A shelf life for the electrodes;
(vi) Instructions for use, including
placement of the device on the patient;
and
(vii) Cleaning instructions.
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0866]
Safety Zone; Sacramento New Year’s
Eve Fireworks, Sacramento River,
Sacramento, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the three safety zones in the navigable
waters of the Sacramento River near
River Walk Park and the Tower Bridge
in Sacramento, CA in support of the
Sacramento New Year’s Eve Fireworks
in the Captain of the Port, San Francisco
area of responsibility on December 31,
2021. This action is necessary to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from the dangers
associated with pyrotechnics. During
the enforcement periods noted below,
unauthorized persons or vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring in the safety zone,
unless authorized by the Patrol
Commander (PATCOM) or other federal,
state, or local law enforcement agencies
on scene to assist the Coast Guard in
enforcing the regulated area.
DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR
165.1191, will be enforced for the
location in Table 1 to § 165.1191, Item
number 25, from 8:30 p.m. until 9:45
p.m. on December 31, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or
email Lieutenant Anthony Solares,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone
(415) 399–3585, email SFWaterways@
uscg.mil.
SUMMARY:
The Coast
Guard will enforce the safety zones
established in 33 CFR 165.1191 Table 1,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Item number 25, for the Sacramento
New Year’s Eve Fireworks Display from
8:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on December
31, 2021, or as announcement via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The safety
zone will extend to all three safety
zones established in 33 CFR 165.1191
Table 1, Item number 25. During the
period of enforcement, the three safety
zones for the Sacramento New Year’s
Eve Fireworks Display will encompass
the navigable waters, from surface to
bottom, around the fireworks firing sites
within three respective circles each with
a radius of 700 feet with the respective
circle centers in approximate positions:
Southern Firing Site at 38°34′50.00″ N
121°30′29.20″ W,
Northern Firing Site at 38°35′02.07″ N
121°30′39.73″ W, and
Near the Tower Bridge at 34°34′49.43″ N
121°30′29.19″ W (NAD83).
Coast Guard
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
70377
The safety zones will be enforced
from 8:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on
December 31, 2021, or as announced via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
In addition to this notification in the
Federal Register, the Coast Guard plans
to provide notification of the safety zone
and its enforcement period via the Local
Notice to Mariners.
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1191, unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring in
the safety zone during all applicable
effective dates and times, unless
authorized to do so by the PATCOM or
other Official Patrol defined as a federal,
state, or local law enforcement agency
on scene to assist the Coast Guard in
enforcing the regulated area.
Additionally, each person who receives
notice of a lawful order or direction
issued by the PATCOM or Official
Patrol shall obey the order or direction.
The PATCOM or Official Patrol may,
upon request, allow the transit of
commercial vessels through regulated
areas when it is safe to do so.
If the Captain of the Port determines
that the regulated area need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in
this notice, a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners may be used to grant general
permission to enter the regulated area.
Dated: December 6, 2021.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2021–26792 Filed 12–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
10DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 235 (Friday, December 10, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70375-70377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26740]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0595]
Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is
classifying the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) into class II (special
controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are
identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for
the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for ADHD's
classification. We are taking this action because we have determined
that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will
provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the
device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to
beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective December 10, 2021. The classification
was applicable on April 19, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Scott, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4208, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5433,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the transcutaneous electrical
nerve stimulator for ADHD as class II (special controls), which we have
determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovation, by placing the device into a
lower device class than the automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device
is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the procedures
for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
[[Page 70376]]
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo
process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that
type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request
or premarket approval application to market a substantially equivalent
device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial equivalence'').
Instead, sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when
necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On July 30, 2018, NeuroSigma, Inc. submitted a request for De Novo
classification of the Monarch eTNS System. FDA reviewed the request in
order to classify the device under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on April 19, 2019, FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is
codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
882.5898.\1\ We have named the generic type of device transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator for ADHD, and it is identified as a
prescription device that stimulates transcutaneously or percutaneously
through electrodes placed on the forehead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for ADHD Risks and
Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adverse tissue reaction........... Biocompatibility evaluation.
Injury or discomfort from Electromagnetic compatibility
electrical stimulation, including testing; Electrical, mechanical,
burns and nerve damage. and thermal safety testing; Non-
clinical performance testing;
Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis; Shelf life
testing; and Labeling.
Misuse that may result in device Labeling.
failure, user discomfort, or
injury.
Skin irritation or infection from Labeling.
use on broken skin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulators for ADHD are for prescription use only. Prescription
devices are exempt from the requirement for adequate directions for use
for the layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR
801.5, as long as the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met (referring
to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part
820, regarding quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and
under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR
part 882 is amended as follows:
[[Page 70377]]
PART 882--NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 882 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 882.5898 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 882.5898 Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
(a) Identification. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator
for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prescription
device that stimulates transcutaneously or percutaneously through
electrodes placed on the forehead.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) The patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic
compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety of the
device.
(3) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The
following must be performed:
(i) Electrical performance testing must validate electrical output
and duration of stimulation;
(ii) Battery performance testing must be performed; and
(iii) Adhesive integrity testing of the electrodes must be
conducted.
(4) The technical parameters of the device including waveform,
maximum output current and voltage, pulse duration, frequency, net
charge per pulse, maximum current density, maximum average current, and
maximum average power density must be fully characterized.
(5) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be
performed.
(6) Shelf life testing of the electrodes must be performed to
demonstrate continued package integrity and component functionality
over the labeled shelf life.
(7) Labeling must include the following:
(i) A contraindication for patients with an implanted metallic or
electronic device in the head, a cardiac pacemaker, or an implanted or
wearable defibrillator;
(ii) A warning that the device is only for use on clean, intact
skin;
(iii) Information on how the device operates and the typical
sensations experienced during treatment;
(iv) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters;
(v) A shelf life for the electrodes;
(vi) Instructions for use, including placement of the device on the
patient; and
(vii) Cleaning instructions.
Dated: December 6, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-26740 Filed 12-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P