Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Permit Streamline Updates, 68954-68957 [2021-26148]
Download as PDF
68954
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 231 / Monday, December 6, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1 OF § 165.801—SECTOR OHIO VALLEY ANNUAL AND RECURRING SAFETY ZONES—Continued
Date
Sponsor/name
Sector Ohio Valley
location
Safety zone
93. 1 day in October .............................
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society/Light
the Night Walk Fireworks.
Yeatman’s Fireworks ............................
West Virginia Motor Car Festival ..........
Nashville, TN .........
Monster Pumpkin Festival ....................
Pittsburgh, PA .......
Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership/Light
Up Night.
Kittanning Light Up Night Firework Display.
Santa Spectacular/Light up Night .........
Pittsburgh, PA .......
Monongahela Holiday Show .................
Monongahela, PA
Friends of the Festival/Cheer at the
Pier.
Gallipolis in Lights .................................
Pittsburgh Cultural Trust/Highmark
First Night Pittsburgh.
University of Tennessee/UT Football
Fireworks.
Chattanooga, TN ...
Cumberland River, Miles 189.7–192.1
(Tennessee).
Ohio River, Miles 469.0–470.5 (Ohio).
Kanawha River, Miles 58–59 (West
Virginia).
Allegheny River, Miles 0.0–0.25 (Pennsylvania).
Allegheny River, Miles 0.0–1.0 (Pennsylvania).
Allegheny River, Miles 44.5–45.5
(Pennsylvania).
Ohio River, Miles 0.0–0.5, Allegheny
River,
Miles
0.0–0.5,
and
Monongahela River, Mile 0.0–0.5
(Pennsylvania).
Ohio River, Miles 31.5–32.5 (Pennsylvania).
Tennessee River, Miles 462.7–465.2
(Tennessee).
Ohio River, Miles 269.2–270 (Ohio).
Allegheny River, Miles 0.5–1.0 (Pennsylvania).
Tennessee River, Miles 645.6–648.3
(Tennessee).
94. 1 day—First two weeks in October
95. 1 day—One weekend in October ...
96. 2 days—One of the last three
weekends in October.
97. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving
98. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving
99. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving
100. 1 day—Friday before Thanksgiving.
101. 1 day in November ........................
102. 1 day—Third week of November ..
103. 1 day—December 31 ....................
104. 7 days—Scheduled home games
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 22, 2021.
A.M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2021–26310 Filed 12–3–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2020–0504; FRL–9202–01–
R5]
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Permit
Streamline Updates
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
certain changes to Wisconsin’s State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
changes include defining and removing
terms, creating a more streamlined
process for permit applications and
reports submitted electronically, and
clarifying rules to create a more efficient
permit issuance process. Approving this
revision also makes Wisconsin rules
consistent with Federal rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 5, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Dec 03, 2021
Jkt 256001
Cincinnati, OH .......
Charleston, WV .....
Kittanning, PA .......
Pittsburgh, PA .......
Gallipolis, OH ........
Pittsburgh, PA .......
Knoxville, TN .........
OAR–2020–0504 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
damico.genevieve@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Kraj, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312)353–2654, kraj.susan@
epa.gov. The EPA Region 5 office is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays and facility closures
due to COVID–19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Wisconsin’s Submittal
II. Review of the Submittal
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Wisconsin’s Submittal
Wisconsin submitted this SIP revision
request on April 6, 2021, and
supplemental information on June 22,
2021, and July 27, 2021. This submittal
includes revisions to the definitions in
Chapter NR 400, to the minor
construction permit program in Chapter
NR 406, and to the operating permit
program in Chapter NR 407.
Specifically, Wisconsin is requesting to
repeal NR 406.03(1e)(a), (b), and (j), NR
406.04(1f)(c) and (Note), NR
407.02(6)(a)3.(Note), NR 407.11(1)(e)
and (3)(c), and NR 407.12(1)(b)(Note)
and (e); to amend NR 400.02(130),
(136m)(intro.) and (b), NR 406.02(6), NR
406.03(1e)(intro.), (c), (1m)(a), (b),
(2)(b)2.c. and (g), NR 406.04(1)(i)(intro.),
2, 3, 4, (m)(intro.), (zg)1, (1k)(intro.),
(1q)(f), (g), (2)(h), (4)(a)5, (b)(title), (b),
(h)2, (j)2, and (7), NR 406.17(3)(d), NR
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 231 / Monday, December 6, 2021 / Proposed Rules
407.02(9), NR 407.03(1)(intro.), (1m)(a)2,
(c)1, (2)(f) and (g), NR 407.05(2) and (6),
NR 407.105(3)(b), NR 407.11(1)(a), NR
407.14(1m)(d), and NR 407.15(5); and to
create NR 400.02(136m)(b)(Note), (136r),
(162)(a)61 and 62, NR 406.04(1)(a)4m,
(bm), (1f)(f) and (4)(e)3, NR
407.03(1)(a)4m, (bm) and (2)(ba).
Wisconsin’s Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) has requested
administrative changes to its definitions
in Section NR 400. The definitions of
‘‘reconstruction’’ and ‘‘restricted use
RICE’’ have been amended, the
definition for ‘‘RICE’’ was created, and
two hazardous air pollutants (HAPS)
have been included to be consistent
with the Federal definition for volatile
organic compounds (VOC).
WDNR also submitted changes to its
minor source construction permitting
program, NR 406. The definition of
‘‘permit revision’’ in NR 406.02(6), and
definitions of ‘‘commence construction’’
and ‘‘commence modification’’ were
amended to align with the Federal
definitions. The list of activities in NR
406.03 (1e) was revised to remove
language that is outdated. The
requirements for application forms were
also clarified.
The State amended NR 406.03(1m) to
clarify the procedures for applying for a
construction permit waiver.
Additionally, the State amended the
meaning of economic hardship to
remove language restricting economic or
financial hardship that could ‘‘preclude
the project in its entirety.’’
Wisconsin created provisions NR
406.04(1)(a)4m and NR 407.03(1)(a)4m
for external combustion sources that fire
ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel oil to comply
with 40 CFR 80.510. An exemption for
the incineration of confiscated drugs by
a government agency using certain
equipment with specific parameters and
limits was added at NR 406.04(1)(bm)
and NR 407.03(1)(bm).
Wisconsin amended the provisions in
NR 406.04(1)(i) to clarify that research
and testing exemptions may only be
provided for temporary changes or
temporary equipment. Wisconsin
created NR 406.04(1f)(f) to require that
an operation permit application shall be
submitted prior to commencing
construction or modification even when
no construction permit is required.
The State also amended the Plantwide
Applicability Limit (PAL) provision at
NR 406.04(1f)(f) clarifying that new or
modified sources exempt from
construction permitting under a PAL
must be included in an operation permit
application submitted prior to
commencing construction or
modification. Wisconsin is also
clarifying in NR 406.04(1k) that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Dec 03, 2021
Jkt 256001
exemption for projects evaluated for
significant net emissions increase can
only be requested prior to commencing
construction, and that this exemption is
only available for the modification of an
existing emission unit and not for the
construction of a new emission unit.
Revisions to NR 406.04(4)(b) allow an
exemption for emissions units that must
meet new or revised VOC reasonably
available control technology (RACT)
rules to also apply to new or revised
nitrogen oxides (NOX) RACT.
The State has also revised NR 406.04
to clarify that an increase in hours of
operation does not constitute an
exclusion from modification if the
change is subject to certain Federal
requirements, and to clarify that the
emissions increase being referred to is
the maximum theoretical emissions
increase.
Revisions were made to NR 406.17(3)
to clarify when sources are ineligible for
coverage under a registration
construction permit. Also a note
referencing previous EPA guidance on
determining when a source can become
an area source referred to as ‘‘once in
always in’’ has been removed as this
guidance is no longer applicable.1
The definition of ‘‘synthetic minor
source’’ in NR 407.02 has been amended
to match the Federal policy and
guidance on the types of actions and
permit conditions necessary to establish
a facility as a synthetic minor source.
The permit exemptions in NR
407.03(1m)(a)2 and (c)1, and NR
407.03(2)(f) and (g), are available if the
facility is not subject to an emission
limitation or emission standard under
section 111 or 112, are amended to be
consistent with the parallel exemptions
in NR 406.
NR 407.03(2)(ba) is created to correct
an error by including an exemption for
particulate matter less than 10 microns
not to exceed 3.4 pounds per hour to
make the exemption in NR 407
consistent with that in NR 406.
NR 407.05(2) and (6) are amended to
remove certain requirements relating to
submitting multiple paper copies of
application materials.
NR 407.105(3)(b) is amended to
replace ‘‘standard or regulation’’ with
‘‘emission limitation or emission
standard’’.
NR 407.11(1)(e) and (3)(c) under
administrative permit revisions and NR
407.12(1)(b)(Note) and (e) under minor
permit revision are repealed.
1 Memorandum: Reclassification of Major Sources
as Area Sources under Section 112 of the Clean Air
Act, William L. Wehrum, Assistant Administrator,
Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (January 25, 2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68955
NR 407.14(1m)(d) is amended to
clarify that correcting a typographical
error must not substantively change the
meaning of a permit condition.
NR 407.15 (5), failure to pay fees, is
amended to add citations to Wisconsin
statute s. 285.
II. Review of the Submittal
A. Except for the revisions discussed
below in Section II.B, Wisconsin’s
submittal includes administrative and
non-substantive changes such as the
removal of outdated language,
clarifications of rule applicability and
correction of errors, and changes to
ensure conformance with Federal
requirements. These revisions remove
provisions that are obsolete, revise rule
language for consistency, or clarify
provisions which are already in effect as
a matter of law in the State program.
These changes are not substantive, do
not affect emissions, and do not
interfere with requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA). Therefore, EPA is
proposing to approve these revisions.
B. The following revisions in
Wisconsin’s submittal require further
analysis: The creation of new
exemptions from minor source air
permitting and the revisions to
exemptions from minor source air
permitting. Specifically, EPA will
review the following below: (1) The
permit exemption for fuel burning
installations combusting ultra-low
sulfur diesel fuel, (2) the exemption for
incineration of small quantities of
confiscated drugs by a government
agency, (3) the revision to allow
temporary steam generating units to
operate up to 24 hours simultaneously
with the units they are temporarily
replacing during periods of startup and
shutdown, and (4) the revision to State
RACT. EPA is using the following
criteria to review these changes for
compliance with Federal
requirements—40 CFR part 51, subpart
I—Review of New Sources and
Modifications, and section 110(l) of the
CAA.
40 CFR 51.160 requires that the SIP
set forth legally enforceable procedures
that enable the state or local agency to
determine whether any construction or
modification of a source will (1) cause
a violation of the SIP or (2) interfere
with attainment or maintenance of a
national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS). Section 110(l) of the CAA
provides that a revision to a SIP
submitted by a state shall be only be
adopted by the state after reasonable
notice and public hearing, and the
Administrator shall not approve a
revision to a SIP if the revision would
interfere with any applicable
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
68956
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 231 / Monday, December 6, 2021 / Proposed Rules
requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress, or any other
applicable requirement of this chapter.
WDNR provided opportunities to
comment on the proposed rule during a
public comment period from March 5,
2019 through April 24, 2019, and at a
public hearing held on April 17, 2019,
in accordance with chapter 227 of the
Wisconsin Statutes. Based on our
review of the public process
documentation included in the
submittal, we find that the Wisconsin
has provided sufficient evidence of
public notice and opportunity for
comment and public hearings prior to
submittal of this SIP revision and has
satisfied the procedural requirements
for notice and a public hearing under
CAA section 110(l).
For the provisions in 40 CFR 51.160,
and section 110(l) of the CAA that
require that the revisions may not cause
a violation of the SIP or interfere with
attainment or maintenance of a NAAQS,
Wisconsin’s submittal includes an
analysis to demonstrate these
requirements will be met. For the
reasons discussed below, the new and
revised exemptions in the submittal will
not interfere with any SIP requirement
or any applicable requirement
concerning attainment.
Wisconsin provided an analysis for
the following changes: The exemptions
in NR 406.04(1)(a)4m and NR
407.03(1)(a)4m for external combustion
sources that fire ultra-low sulfur diesel
fuel oil; the exemptions in NR
406.04(1)(bm) and NR 407.03(1)(bm) for
incinerators operated by a government
agency that burn confiscated drugs and
meet other requirements; the revisions
to NR 406.04(1)(zg) to allow temporary
steam generating units to operate at the
same time as the permanent steam
generation equipment it is replacing for
up to 24 hours during startup or
shutdown; and the revisions to NR
406.04(4)(b) to allow the exemption for
emissions units that must meet new or
revised VOC RACT rules, to also apply
to new or revised NOX RACT rules.
For the exemptions in NR
406.04(1)(a)4m, and NR 407.03(1)(a)4m
regarding ultra-low sulfur, Wisconsin
provided in its analysis that this
exemption increased the size of exempt
units from 10 million British thermal
units per hour (MMBtu/hr) to 25
MMBtu/hr for external combustion
furnaces firing ultra-low sulfur diesel
fuel. Because of the reduction in sulfur
content in ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel,
emissions will not increase when the
unit size is increased to 25 MMBtu/hr
and emissions will remain below all
existing SIP-approved exemption
thresholds.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Dec 03, 2021
Jkt 256001
For the exemption in NR
406.04(1)(bm) and NR 407.03(1)(bm) for
incinerators operated by government
agencies to burn certain confiscated
drugs, Wisconsin provided that this
exemption follows Federal regulations
that exclude incineration of confiscated
drugs by law enforcement and border
patrols from the applicable National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants requirements (40 CFR
60.2887(p)). Wisconsin also provided
emissions estimates (for maximum
theoretical emissions) based on
uncontrolled emission factors for
medical waste incineration. The State
deems these factors similar and
appropriate because confiscated drugs
are likely to be burned with plastic or
foil packaging and possibly needles.
Wisconsin’s analysis also assumed the
worst-case fuel for the emission
calculations. Wisconsin’s emission
estimates demonstrate that combusting
confiscated drugs under the parameters
required by NR 406.04(1)(bm) and NR
407.03(1)(bm) will result in emissions
that are less than the existing SIPapproved permit exemption thresholds
in NR 406.04(2) and NR 407.03(2). In
addition, the rules require the use of a
monitoring device that continuously
measures and records the temperature of
the secondary chamber of the
incinerator to ensure a proper
destruction efficiency.
For the revision to the exemption in
NR 406.04(1)(zg) for temporary steam
generating units, Wisconsin explained
in its analysis that the current unrevised
SIP-approved exemption limits these
temporary units to operating a total of
3,200 hours during nine calendar
months, and this limit is unchanged by
the revision. Therefore, the maximum
emissions will not increase. The
exemption also continues to require that
the NAAQS are protected at all times
the temporary units are operating.
The revision to NR 406.04(4)(b)
excludes from permit modifications
changes needed for the source to assure
compliance with any new or revised
RACT requirements for NOX. The
revision adds NOX to the existing
exemption which was for VOC RACT.
Before any new or revised NOX RACT
rules can be SIP-approved, there will
need to be a demonstration under
section 110(l) of the CAA for that
submittal.
III. What action is EPA taking?
For the reasons set forth above, EPA
is proposing to approve the requested
revisions to Wisconsin’s SIP as
submitted on April 6, 2021. These
revisions were included in the certified
Board Order AM–24–12b and published
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in the Wisconsin Administrative
Register #777B on September 28, 2020.
Based on the information submitted by
Wisconsin on April 6, 2021, June 22,
2021, and July 27, 2021, EPA has
determined that Wisconsin’s submittal
is approvable and there were no
deficiencies found that would prevent
EPA approval.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
revisions to Wisconsin Administrative
Code rules NR 400, 406 and 407 as
published in the Wisconsin Register
#777B on September 28, 2020, effective
October 1, 2020, discussed in section I
of this preamble. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 5 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011); Does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 231 / Monday, December 6, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 24, 2021.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2021–26148 Filed 12–3–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2021–0473; FRL- 8981–01–
R4]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina;
Mecklenburg Monitoring,
Recordkeeping, and Reporting Rule
Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision to the Mecklenburg County
portion of the North Carolina SIP,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Dec 03, 2021
Jkt 256001
hereinafter referred to as the
Mecklenburg Local Implementation
Plan (LIP). The revision was submitted
by the State of North Carolina, through
the North Carolina Division of Air
Quality (NCDAQ), on behalf of
Mecklenburg County Air Quality
(MCAQ) via a letter dated April 24,
2020, and was received by EPA on June
19, 2020. The revision updates several
Mecklenburg County Air Pollution
Control Ordinance (MCAPCO) rules and
adds three new rules for incorporation
into the LIP. These rules cover general
recordkeeping, monitoring, and
reporting requirements. EPA is
proposing to approve these changes
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 5, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2021–0473 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Evan Adams, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
9009. Mr. Adams can also be reached
via electronic mail at adams.evan@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Overview
The Mecklenburg County LIP was
submitted to EPA on June 14, 1990, and
EPA approved the plan on May 2, 1991.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68957
See 56 FR 20140. Mecklenburg County
prepared three submittals in order to
modify the LIP for, among other things,
general consistency with the North
Carolina SIP.1 The three submittals were
submitted as follows: NCDAQ
transmitted the October 25, 2017,
submittal to EPA but later withdrew it
from review through a letter dated
February 15, 2019. On April 24, 2020,
NCDAQ resubmitted the October 25,
2017, update to EPA and also submitted
the January 21, 2016, and January 14,
2019, updates. Due to an inconsistency
with public notice at the local level,
these submittals were withdrawn from
EPA through a letter dated February 15,
2019. Mecklenburg County corrected
this error, and NCDAQ submitted the
updates to EPA in a submittal dated
April 24, 2020.2
II. What action is EPA proposing to
take?
The April 24, 2020, submittal updates
several MCAPCO rules incorporated
into the LIP and adds several rules to
more closely align the LIP with the SIP.
The January 21, 2016, portion of this
submission includes reorganization and
updates to rules contained in MCAPCO
Section 2.0600, including MCAPCO
Rules 2.0601, Purpose and Scope;
2.0602, Definitions; 2.0604, Exceptions
to Monitoring and Reporting
Requirements; 2.0607, Large Wood and
Wood-Fossil Fuel Combination Units;
and 2.0610, Delegation Federal
Monitoring Requirements.3
Additionally, the submittal seeks to add
MCAPCO Rules 2.0605, General
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements; 2.0611, Monitoring
Emissions from Other Sources; and
2.0613, Quality Assurance Program to
the LIP. EPA is proposing to approve the
updates and new rules because they
improve alignment of the LIP and the
SIP and will not interfere with any
applicable CAA requirements. The
remainder of this section discusses the
proposed changes to the LIP.
A. Rule 2.0601, ‘‘Purpose and Scope’’
The April 24, 2020, submittal
includes updates to Rule 2.0601,
Purpose and Scope. This rule outlines
the purpose of this section and
1 The Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
revision that is dated April 24, 2020, and received
by EPA on June 19, 2020, is comprised of three
previous submittals—one dated January 21, 2016;
one dated October 25, 2017; and one dated January
14, 2019.
2 EPA notes that the April 24, 2020, submittal was
received by EPA on June 19, 2020.
3 The April 24, 2020, submittal contains changes
to other Mecklenburg LIP-approved rules that are
not addressed in this notice. EPA will be acting on
those rules in separate actions.
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 231 (Monday, December 6, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68954-68957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26148]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2020-0504; FRL-9202-01-R5]
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Permit Streamline Updates
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve certain changes to Wisconsin's State Implementation Plan (SIP).
These changes include defining and removing terms, creating a more
streamlined process for permit applications and reports submitted
electronically, and clarifying rules to create a more efficient permit
issuance process. Approving this revision also makes Wisconsin rules
consistent with Federal rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 5, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2020-0504 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Kraj, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312)353-2654, [email protected]. The EPA Region 5
office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays and facility closures due to COVID-19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Wisconsin's Submittal
II. Review of the Submittal
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Wisconsin's Submittal
Wisconsin submitted this SIP revision request on April 6, 2021, and
supplemental information on June 22, 2021, and July 27, 2021. This
submittal includes revisions to the definitions in Chapter NR 400, to
the minor construction permit program in Chapter NR 406, and to the
operating permit program in Chapter NR 407. Specifically, Wisconsin is
requesting to repeal NR 406.03(1e)(a), (b), and (j), NR 406.04(1f)(c)
and (Note), NR 407.02(6)(a)3.(Note), NR 407.11(1)(e) and (3)(c), and NR
407.12(1)(b)(Note) and (e); to amend NR 400.02(130), (136m)(intro.) and
(b), NR 406.02(6), NR 406.03(1e)(intro.), (c), (1m)(a), (b), (2)(b)2.c.
and (g), NR 406.04(1)(i)(intro.), 2, 3, 4, (m)(intro.), (zg)1,
(1k)(intro.), (1q)(f), (g), (2)(h), (4)(a)5, (b)(title), (b), (h)2,
(j)2, and (7), NR 406.17(3)(d), NR
[[Page 68955]]
407.02(9), NR 407.03(1)(intro.), (1m)(a)2, (c)1, (2)(f) and (g), NR
407.05(2) and (6), NR 407.105(3)(b), NR 407.11(1)(a), NR 407.14(1m)(d),
and NR 407.15(5); and to create NR 400.02(136m)(b)(Note), (136r),
(162)(a)61 and 62, NR 406.04(1)(a)4m, (bm), (1f)(f) and (4)(e)3, NR
407.03(1)(a)4m, (bm) and (2)(ba).
Wisconsin's Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) has requested
administrative changes to its definitions in Section NR 400. The
definitions of ``reconstruction'' and ``restricted use RICE'' have been
amended, the definition for ``RICE'' was created, and two hazardous air
pollutants (HAPS) have been included to be consistent with the Federal
definition for volatile organic compounds (VOC).
WDNR also submitted changes to its minor source construction
permitting program, NR 406. The definition of ``permit revision'' in NR
406.02(6), and definitions of ``commence construction'' and ``commence
modification'' were amended to align with the Federal definitions. The
list of activities in NR 406.03 (1e) was revised to remove language
that is outdated. The requirements for application forms were also
clarified.
The State amended NR 406.03(1m) to clarify the procedures for
applying for a construction permit waiver. Additionally, the State
amended the meaning of economic hardship to remove language restricting
economic or financial hardship that could ``preclude the project in its
entirety.''
Wisconsin created provisions NR 406.04(1)(a)4m and NR
407.03(1)(a)4m for external combustion sources that fire ultra-low
sulfur diesel fuel oil to comply with 40 CFR 80.510. An exemption for
the incineration of confiscated drugs by a government agency using
certain equipment with specific parameters and limits was added at NR
406.04(1)(bm) and NR 407.03(1)(bm).
Wisconsin amended the provisions in NR 406.04(1)(i) to clarify that
research and testing exemptions may only be provided for temporary
changes or temporary equipment. Wisconsin created NR 406.04(1f)(f) to
require that an operation permit application shall be submitted prior
to commencing construction or modification even when no construction
permit is required.
The State also amended the Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL)
provision at NR 406.04(1f)(f) clarifying that new or modified sources
exempt from construction permitting under a PAL must be included in an
operation permit application submitted prior to commencing construction
or modification. Wisconsin is also clarifying in NR 406.04(1k) that the
exemption for projects evaluated for significant net emissions increase
can only be requested prior to commencing construction, and that this
exemption is only available for the modification of an existing
emission unit and not for the construction of a new emission unit.
Revisions to NR 406.04(4)(b) allow an exemption for emissions units
that must meet new or revised VOC reasonably available control
technology (RACT) rules to also apply to new or revised nitrogen oxides
(NOX) RACT.
The State has also revised NR 406.04 to clarify that an increase in
hours of operation does not constitute an exclusion from modification
if the change is subject to certain Federal requirements, and to
clarify that the emissions increase being referred to is the maximum
theoretical emissions increase.
Revisions were made to NR 406.17(3) to clarify when sources are
ineligible for coverage under a registration construction permit. Also
a note referencing previous EPA guidance on determining when a source
can become an area source referred to as ``once in always in'' has been
removed as this guidance is no longer applicable.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Memorandum: Reclassification of Major Sources as Area
Sources under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, William L. Wehrum,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (January 25, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The definition of ``synthetic minor source'' in NR 407.02 has been
amended to match the Federal policy and guidance on the types of
actions and permit conditions necessary to establish a facility as a
synthetic minor source.
The permit exemptions in NR 407.03(1m)(a)2 and (c)1, and NR
407.03(2)(f) and (g), are available if the facility is not subject to
an emission limitation or emission standard under section 111 or 112,
are amended to be consistent with the parallel exemptions in NR 406.
NR 407.03(2)(ba) is created to correct an error by including an
exemption for particulate matter less than 10 microns not to exceed 3.4
pounds per hour to make the exemption in NR 407 consistent with that in
NR 406.
NR 407.05(2) and (6) are amended to remove certain requirements
relating to submitting multiple paper copies of application materials.
NR 407.105(3)(b) is amended to replace ``standard or regulation''
with ``emission limitation or emission standard''.
NR 407.11(1)(e) and (3)(c) under administrative permit revisions
and NR 407.12(1)(b)(Note) and (e) under minor permit revision are
repealed.
NR 407.14(1m)(d) is amended to clarify that correcting a
typographical error must not substantively change the meaning of a
permit condition.
NR 407.15 (5), failure to pay fees, is amended to add citations to
Wisconsin statute s. 285.
II. Review of the Submittal
A. Except for the revisions discussed below in Section II.B,
Wisconsin's submittal includes administrative and non-substantive
changes such as the removal of outdated language, clarifications of
rule applicability and correction of errors, and changes to ensure
conformance with Federal requirements. These revisions remove
provisions that are obsolete, revise rule language for consistency, or
clarify provisions which are already in effect as a matter of law in
the State program. These changes are not substantive, do not affect
emissions, and do not interfere with requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA). Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve these revisions.
B. The following revisions in Wisconsin's submittal require further
analysis: The creation of new exemptions from minor source air
permitting and the revisions to exemptions from minor source air
permitting. Specifically, EPA will review the following below: (1) The
permit exemption for fuel burning installations combusting ultra-low
sulfur diesel fuel, (2) the exemption for incineration of small
quantities of confiscated drugs by a government agency, (3) the
revision to allow temporary steam generating units to operate up to 24
hours simultaneously with the units they are temporarily replacing
during periods of startup and shutdown, and (4) the revision to State
RACT. EPA is using the following criteria to review these changes for
compliance with Federal requirements--40 CFR part 51, subpart I--Review
of New Sources and Modifications, and section 110(l) of the CAA.
40 CFR 51.160 requires that the SIP set forth legally enforceable
procedures that enable the state or local agency to determine whether
any construction or modification of a source will (1) cause a violation
of the SIP or (2) interfere with attainment or maintenance of a
national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Section 110(l) of the
CAA provides that a revision to a SIP submitted by a state shall be
only be adopted by the state after reasonable notice and public
hearing, and the Administrator shall not approve a revision to a SIP if
the revision would interfere with any applicable
[[Page 68956]]
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or
any other applicable requirement of this chapter.
WDNR provided opportunities to comment on the proposed rule during
a public comment period from March 5, 2019 through April 24, 2019, and
at a public hearing held on April 17, 2019, in accordance with chapter
227 of the Wisconsin Statutes. Based on our review of the public
process documentation included in the submittal, we find that the
Wisconsin has provided sufficient evidence of public notice and
opportunity for comment and public hearings prior to submittal of this
SIP revision and has satisfied the procedural requirements for notice
and a public hearing under CAA section 110(l).
For the provisions in 40 CFR 51.160, and section 110(l) of the CAA
that require that the revisions may not cause a violation of the SIP or
interfere with attainment or maintenance of a NAAQS, Wisconsin's
submittal includes an analysis to demonstrate these requirements will
be met. For the reasons discussed below, the new and revised exemptions
in the submittal will not interfere with any SIP requirement or any
applicable requirement concerning attainment.
Wisconsin provided an analysis for the following changes: The
exemptions in NR 406.04(1)(a)4m and NR 407.03(1)(a)4m for external
combustion sources that fire ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel oil; the
exemptions in NR 406.04(1)(bm) and NR 407.03(1)(bm) for incinerators
operated by a government agency that burn confiscated drugs and meet
other requirements; the revisions to NR 406.04(1)(zg) to allow
temporary steam generating units to operate at the same time as the
permanent steam generation equipment it is replacing for up to 24 hours
during startup or shutdown; and the revisions to NR 406.04(4)(b) to
allow the exemption for emissions units that must meet new or revised
VOC RACT rules, to also apply to new or revised NOX RACT
rules.
For the exemptions in NR 406.04(1)(a)4m, and NR 407.03(1)(a)4m
regarding ultra-low sulfur, Wisconsin provided in its analysis that
this exemption increased the size of exempt units from 10 million
British thermal units per hour (MMBtu/hr) to 25 MMBtu/hr for external
combustion furnaces firing ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel. Because of the
reduction in sulfur content in ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel, emissions
will not increase when the unit size is increased to 25 MMBtu/hr and
emissions will remain below all existing SIP-approved exemption
thresholds.
For the exemption in NR 406.04(1)(bm) and NR 407.03(1)(bm) for
incinerators operated by government agencies to burn certain
confiscated drugs, Wisconsin provided that this exemption follows
Federal regulations that exclude incineration of confiscated drugs by
law enforcement and border patrols from the applicable National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants requirements (40 CFR
60.2887(p)). Wisconsin also provided emissions estimates (for maximum
theoretical emissions) based on uncontrolled emission factors for
medical waste incineration. The State deems these factors similar and
appropriate because confiscated drugs are likely to be burned with
plastic or foil packaging and possibly needles. Wisconsin's analysis
also assumed the worst-case fuel for the emission calculations.
Wisconsin's emission estimates demonstrate that combusting confiscated
drugs under the parameters required by NR 406.04(1)(bm) and NR
407.03(1)(bm) will result in emissions that are less than the existing
SIP-approved permit exemption thresholds in NR 406.04(2) and NR
407.03(2). In addition, the rules require the use of a monitoring
device that continuously measures and records the temperature of the
secondary chamber of the incinerator to ensure a proper destruction
efficiency.
For the revision to the exemption in NR 406.04(1)(zg) for temporary
steam generating units, Wisconsin explained in its analysis that the
current unrevised SIP-approved exemption limits these temporary units
to operating a total of 3,200 hours during nine calendar months, and
this limit is unchanged by the revision. Therefore, the maximum
emissions will not increase. The exemption also continues to require
that the NAAQS are protected at all times the temporary units are
operating.
The revision to NR 406.04(4)(b) excludes from permit modifications
changes needed for the source to assure compliance with any new or
revised RACT requirements for NOX. The revision adds
NOX to the existing exemption which was for VOC RACT. Before
any new or revised NOX RACT rules can be SIP-approved, there
will need to be a demonstration under section 110(l) of the CAA for
that submittal.
III. What action is EPA taking?
For the reasons set forth above, EPA is proposing to approve the
requested revisions to Wisconsin's SIP as submitted on April 6, 2021.
These revisions were included in the certified Board Order AM-24-12b
and published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register #777B on
September 28, 2020. Based on the information submitted by Wisconsin on
April 6, 2021, June 22, 2021, and July 27, 2021, EPA has determined
that Wisconsin's submittal is approvable and there were no deficiencies
found that would prevent EPA approval.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference revisions to Wisconsin Administrative Code rules NR 400, 406
and 407 as published in the Wisconsin Register #777B on September 28,
2020, effective October 1, 2020, discussed in section I of this
preamble. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 5
Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive
[[Page 68957]]
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 24, 2021.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2021-26148 Filed 12-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P