Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Peer Reviews of Contracts for Supplies and Services (DFARS Case 2019-D037), 67876-67877 [2021-25733]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
67876
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 30, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
9. On page 45157, top third of the
page, first column, first partial
paragraph, last line, the phrase,
‘‘technology group 6).’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘technology group 6) in
combination with the following ICD–
10–CM codes: Y95 (Nosocomial
condition) and one of the following: J14
(Pneumonia due to Hemophilus
influenzae) J15.0 (Pneumonia due to
Klebsiella pneumoniae), J15.1
(Pneumonia due to Pseudomonas), J15.5
(Pneumonia due to Escherichia coli),
J15.6 (Pneumonia due to other Gramnegative bacteria), J15.8 (Pneumonia
due to other specified bacteria), or
J95.851 (Ventilator associated
pneumonia) and one of the following:
B96.1 (Klebsiella pneumoniae [K.
pneumoniae] as the cause of diseases
classified elsewhere), B96.20
(Unspecified Escherichia coli [E. coli] as
the cause of diseases classified
elsewhere), B96.21 (Shiga toxinproducing Escherichia coli [E. coli]
[STEC] O157 as the cause of diseases
classified elsewhere), B96.22 (Other
specified Shiga toxin-producing
Escherichia coli [E. coli] [STEC] as the
cause of diseases classified elsewhere),
B96.23 (Unspecified Shiga toxinproducing Escherichia coli [E. coli]
[STEC] as the cause of diseases
classified elsewhere, B96.29 (Other
Escherichia coli [E. coli] as the cause of
diseases classified elsewhere), B96.3
(Hemophilus influenzae [H. influenzae]
as the cause of diseases classified
elsewhere, B96.5 (Pseudomonas
(aeruginosa) (mallei) (pseudomallei) as
the cause of diseases classified
elsewhere), or B96.89 (Other specified
bacterial agents as the cause of diseases
classified elsewhere).’’
b. Within the partial paragraph (item
10), line 8, the code number ‘‘J14.0’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘J14’’.
Karuna Seshasai,
Executive Secretary to the Department,
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2021–26069 Filed 11–29–21; 8:45 am]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Nov 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 201 and 237
[Docket DARS–2021–0023]
RIN 0750–AK77
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Peer Reviews
of Contracts for Supplies and Services
(DFARS Case 2019–D037)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to modify internal processes
for the conduct of peer reviews.
DATES: Effective November 30, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Barbara J. Trujillo, telephone 571–372–
6102.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD is amending the DFARS to revise
the policies at DFARS 201.170 for the
conduct of peer reviews by the Office of
the Principal Director, Defense Pricing
and Contracting (DPC). The rule
removes the requirement for DPC-led,
preaward peer reviews of competitive
procurements valued at $1 billion or
more unless the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment (USD(A&S)) is the
milestone decision authority or unless
USD(A&S) designates a competitive
procurement as requiring a peer review,
regardless of dollar value. Additionally,
DoD components may request DPC-led
peer reviews for competitive
acquisitions valued below the $1 billion
threshold. DPC will conduct the reviews
upon approval by the Director, DPC
(Contract Policy).
The threshold for DPC-led, preaward
peer reviews of noncompetitive
procurements is increased from $500
million to $1 billion. Additionally, the
requirement for DPC-led peer reviews of
noncompetitive procurements will
include any other contract actions
USD(A&S) designates as requiring a peer
review, regardless of dollar value. DoD
components may request DPC-led peer
reviews for noncompetitive acquisitions
valued below the $1 billion threshold.
DPC will conduct the reviews upon
approval by the Director, DPC (Price,
Cost and Finance).
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The rule includes clarification of the
types of contract actions included in
preaward peer reviews for
noncompetitive procurements and
guidance on how to identify the contract
actions that are subject to preaward peer
reviews for competitive and
noncompetitive procurements. DoD
components establish procedures to
conduct preaward peer reviews of
competitive and noncompetitive
procurements that do not meet the
criteria for a DPC-led review. The rule
also removes DPC-led, postaward peer
reviews of acquisitions for services from
the DFARS, and the cross-reference at
DFARS 237.102–76 has been removed.
II. Publication of This Final Rule for
Public Comment Is Not Required by
Statute
The statute that applies to the
publication of the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) is 41 U.S.C. 1707,
Publication of Proposed Regulations.
Subsection (a)(1) of the statute requires
that a procurement policy, regulation,
procedure or form (including an
amendment or modification thereof)
must be published for public comment
if it relates to the expenditure of
appropriated funds, and has either a
significant effect beyond the internal
operating procedures of the agency
issuing the policy, regulation, procedure
or form, or has a significant cost or
administrative impact on contractors or
offerors. This final rule is not required
to be published for public comment,
because the rule concerns DoD’s
internal review processes and does not
have a significant cost or administrative
impact on contractors or offerors.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
This rule does not create or revise any
solicitation provisions or contract
clauses. It does not impact any existing
solicitation provisions or contract
clauses or their applicability to
contracts valued at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold or for
commercial items, including
commercially available off-the-shelf
items.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and
E.O. 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 30, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993.
V. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801–808) before an
interim or final rule takes effect, DoD
will submit a copy of the interim or
final rule with the form, Submission of
Federal Rules under the Congressional
Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule under the
Congressional Review Act cannot take
effect until 60 days after it is published
in the Federal Register. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not a major
rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply to this rule because this final
rule does not constitute a significant
DFARS revision within the meaning of
FAR 1.501–1, and 41 U.S.C. 1707 does
not require publication for public
comment.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 201 and
237
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 201 and 237
are amended as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 201 and 237 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
PART 201—FEDERAL ACQUISITION
REGULATIONS SYSTEM
2. Revise section 201.170 to read as
follows:
■
201.170
Peer reviews.
(a) DPC peer reviews. (1) The Office of
the Principal Director, Defense Pricing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Nov 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
and Contracting (DPC), using the
procedures at PGI 201.170, will organize
teams of reviewers and facilitate peer
reviews for solicitations and contracts as
follows:
(i) DPC will conduct the preaward
peer reviews for competitive
procurements prior to the three phases
of the acquisition (see PGI 201.170–2(a))
for all procurements with an estimated
value of $1 billion or more under major
defense acquisition programs for which
the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Sustainment
(USD(A&S)) is the milestone decision
authority or USD(A&S) designates as
requiring a peer review regardless of
value. DoD components may request
DPC-led peer reviews for acquisitions
valued below the $1 billion threshold.
DPC will conduct these reviews upon
approval by the Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting (Contract
Policy).
(ii) DPC will conduct the preaward
peer reviews for noncompetitive
procurements prior to the two phases of
the acquisition (see PGI 201.170–2(b))
for contract actions, e.g., new contracts,
modifications to existing contracts,
requests for equitable adjustment,
claims valued at $1 billion or more, or
for any other contract action USD(A&S)
designates as requiring a peer review
regardless of value. DoD components
may request DPC-led peer reviews for
contract actions valued below the $1
billion threshold. DPC will conduct
these reviews upon approval by the
Director, Defense Pricing and
Contracting (Price, Cost and Finance).
(iii) Use the following criteria to
identify actions that are subject to peer
review (see also FAR 1.108(c), Dollar
thresholds):
(A) If the not-to-exceed amount for an
undefinitized contract action or an
unpriced change order exceeds the peer
review threshold, then the resultant
definitization modification(s) will be
subject to peer review regardless of
actual performance up to the point of
definitization.
(B) For indefinite delivery indefinite
quantity (IDIQ) contracts that will
establish pricing terms that apply to
orders, use the total maximum dollar
value for purposes of the peer review
threshold. IDIQ contracts that will not
establish pricing terms in the basic
contract are not subject to peer review,
but individual orders that exceed the
threshold are subject to peer review.
(C) For noncompetitive contract
actions, use the greater of the following
when considering the firm requirement
for all supplies or services:
(1) The approved Government
objective amount.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67877
(2) The contractor proposed amount.
(2) To facilitate planning for peer
reviews, the military departments and
defense agencies shall provide a rolling
annual forecast of acquisitions that will
be subject to DPC peer reviews at the
end of each quarter (i.e., March 31; June
30; September 30; December 31).
(i) Military departments and defense
agencies shall submit quarterly forecasts
for competitive peer reviews to the
Director, Defense Pricing and
Contracting (Contract Policy), at
osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dpc-cp@
mail.mil.
(ii) Military departments and defense
agencies shall submit quarterly forecasts
for noncompetitive peer reviews to the
Director, Defense Pricing and
Contracting (Price, Cost and Finance), at
osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dpc-pcf@
mail.mil.
(b) Component peer reviews. The
military departments and defense
agencies shall establish procedures for—
(1) Preaward peer reviews of
solicitations for competitive
procurements not subject to paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section; and
(2) Preaward peer reviews of
noncompetitive procurements not
subject to paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this
section.
PART 237—SERVICE CONTRACTING
237.102–76
[Removed and Reserved]
3. Remove and reserve section
237.102–76.
■
[FR Doc. 2021–25733 Filed 11–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 210325–0071; RTID 0648–
XB612]
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Herring Fishery; 2021
Closure of the Atlantic Herring Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; fishery closure.
AGENCY:
NMFS is closing the Atlantic
herring fishery and implementing a
2,000-lb (907.2-kg) possession limit for
herring in all Herring Management
Areas. This is required because NMFS
projects that herring catch will reach 95
percent of the annual catch limit before
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 30, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67876-67877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25733]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 201 and 237
[Docket DARS-2021-0023]
RIN 0750-AK77
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Peer Reviews
of Contracts for Supplies and Services (DFARS Case 2019-D037)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to modify internal processes
for the conduct of peer reviews.
DATES: Effective November 30, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Barbara J. Trujillo, telephone
571-372-6102.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is amending the DFARS to revise the policies at DFARS 201.170
for the conduct of peer reviews by the Office of the Principal
Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC). The rule removes the
requirement for DPC-led, preaward peer reviews of competitive
procurements valued at $1 billion or more unless the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (USD(A&S)) is the milestone
decision authority or unless USD(A&S) designates a competitive
procurement as requiring a peer review, regardless of dollar value.
Additionally, DoD components may request DPC-led peer reviews for
competitive acquisitions valued below the $1 billion threshold. DPC
will conduct the reviews upon approval by the Director, DPC (Contract
Policy).
The threshold for DPC-led, preaward peer reviews of noncompetitive
procurements is increased from $500 million to $1 billion.
Additionally, the requirement for DPC-led peer reviews of
noncompetitive procurements will include any other contract actions
USD(A&S) designates as requiring a peer review, regardless of dollar
value. DoD components may request DPC-led peer reviews for
noncompetitive acquisitions valued below the $1 billion threshold. DPC
will conduct the reviews upon approval by the Director, DPC (Price,
Cost and Finance).
The rule includes clarification of the types of contract actions
included in preaward peer reviews for noncompetitive procurements and
guidance on how to identify the contract actions that are subject to
preaward peer reviews for competitive and noncompetitive procurements.
DoD components establish procedures to conduct preaward peer reviews of
competitive and noncompetitive procurements that do not meet the
criteria for a DPC-led review. The rule also removes DPC-led, postaward
peer reviews of acquisitions for services from the DFARS, and the
cross-reference at DFARS 237.102-76 has been removed.
II. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required
by Statute
The statute that applies to the publication of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is 41 U.S.C. 1707, Publication of Proposed
Regulations. Subsection (a)(1) of the statute requires that a
procurement policy, regulation, procedure or form (including an
amendment or modification thereof) must be published for public comment
if it relates to the expenditure of appropriated funds, and has either
a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the
agency issuing the policy, regulation, procedure or form, or has a
significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors.
This final rule is not required to be published for public comment,
because the rule concerns DoD's internal review processes and does not
have a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or
offerors.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule does not create or revise any solicitation provisions or
contract clauses. It does not impact any existing solicitation
provisions or contract clauses or their applicability to contracts
valued at or below the simplified acquisition threshold or for
commercial items, including commercially available off-the-shelf items.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and E.O. 13563 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety
[[Page 67877]]
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs,
of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a
significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review
under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
September 30, 1993.
V. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808)
before an interim or final rule takes effect, DoD will submit a copy of
the interim or final rule with the form, Submission of Federal Rules
under the Congressional Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A
major rule under the Congressional Review Act cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not
a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule because
this final rule does not constitute a significant DFARS revision within
the meaning of FAR 1.501-1, and 41 U.S.C. 1707 does not require
publication for public comment.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 201 and 237
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 201 and 237 are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 201 and 237 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 201--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM
0
2. Revise section 201.170 to read as follows:
201.170 Peer reviews.
(a) DPC peer reviews. (1) The Office of the Principal Director,
Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC), using the procedures at PGI
201.170, will organize teams of reviewers and facilitate peer reviews
for solicitations and contracts as follows:
(i) DPC will conduct the preaward peer reviews for competitive
procurements prior to the three phases of the acquisition (see PGI
201.170-2(a)) for all procurements with an estimated value of $1
billion or more under major defense acquisition programs for which the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (USD(A&S))
is the milestone decision authority or USD(A&S) designates as requiring
a peer review regardless of value. DoD components may request DPC-led
peer reviews for acquisitions valued below the $1 billion threshold.
DPC will conduct these reviews upon approval by the Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting (Contract Policy).
(ii) DPC will conduct the preaward peer reviews for noncompetitive
procurements prior to the two phases of the acquisition (see PGI
201.170-2(b)) for contract actions, e.g., new contracts, modifications
to existing contracts, requests for equitable adjustment, claims valued
at $1 billion or more, or for any other contract action USD(A&S)
designates as requiring a peer review regardless of value. DoD
components may request DPC-led peer reviews for contract actions valued
below the $1 billion threshold. DPC will conduct these reviews upon
approval by the Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting (Price, Cost
and Finance).
(iii) Use the following criteria to identify actions that are
subject to peer review (see also FAR 1.108(c), Dollar thresholds):
(A) If the not-to-exceed amount for an undefinitized contract
action or an unpriced change order exceeds the peer review threshold,
then the resultant definitization modification(s) will be subject to
peer review regardless of actual performance up to the point of
definitization.
(B) For indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts
that will establish pricing terms that apply to orders, use the total
maximum dollar value for purposes of the peer review threshold. IDIQ
contracts that will not establish pricing terms in the basic contract
are not subject to peer review, but individual orders that exceed the
threshold are subject to peer review.
(C) For noncompetitive contract actions, use the greater of the
following when considering the firm requirement for all supplies or
services:
(1) The approved Government objective amount.
(2) The contractor proposed amount.
(2) To facilitate planning for peer reviews, the military
departments and defense agencies shall provide a rolling annual
forecast of acquisitions that will be subject to DPC peer reviews at
the end of each quarter (i.e., March 31; June 30; September 30;
December 31).
(i) Military departments and defense agencies shall submit
quarterly forecasts for competitive peer reviews to the Director,
Defense Pricing and Contracting (Contract Policy), at
[email protected].
(ii) Military departments and defense agencies shall submit
quarterly forecasts for noncompetitive peer reviews to the Director,
Defense Pricing and Contracting (Price, Cost and Finance), at
[email protected].
(b) Component peer reviews. The military departments and defense
agencies shall establish procedures for--
(1) Preaward peer reviews of solicitations for competitive
procurements not subject to paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section; and
(2) Preaward peer reviews of noncompetitive procurements not
subject to paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section.
PART 237--SERVICE CONTRACTING
237.102-76 [Removed and Reserved]
0
3. Remove and reserve section 237.102-76.
[FR Doc. 2021-25733 Filed 11-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
