Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the General Laparoscopic Power Morcellation Containment System, 66456-66458 [2021-25585]
Download as PDF
66456
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
T–348 LESNR, SD to LUNGS, WI [Amended]
LESNR, SD
WP
TECUD, SD
FIX
Sioux Falls, SD (FSD)
VORTAC
GRSIS, MN
WP
FOOLS, MN
WP
GABDE, MN
WP
KRRTR, IA
WP
Madison, WI (MSN)
VORTAC
WP
LUNGS, WI
*
*
*
T–409 LLUKY, NE to Pierre, SD (PIR) [New]
LLUKY, NE
WP
ADEDY, SD
FIX
LESNR, SD
WP
Pierre, SD (PIR)
VORTAC
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–25469 Filed 11–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA–2018–N–1913]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic
Surgery Devices; Classification of the
General Laparoscopic Power
Morcellation Containment System
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the general laparoscopic
power morcellation containment system
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
general laparoscopic power
morcellation containment system’s
classification. We are taking this action
because we have determined that
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Nov 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
*
43°29′16.49″
43°32′54.48″
43°38′58.14″
43°38′45.54″
43°46′58.20″
43°38′50.04″
43°16′18.12″
43°08′41.41″
43°02′43.66″
*
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
*
Frm 00054
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 10, 2021, and
effective September 15, 2021, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6011 United States Area
Navigation Routes.
*
*
*
*
*
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
*
(Lat. 42°29′20.26″ N, long. 098°38′11.44″ W)
(Lat.43°03′05.06″ N, long. 099°17′41.35″ W)
(Lat. 43°29′16.49″ N, long. 099°45′41.00″ W)
(Lat. 44°23′40.40″ N, long. 100°09′46.11″ W)
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
general laparoscopic power
morcellation containment system as
class II (special controls), which we
have determined will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe
this action will enhance patients’ access
to beneficial innovation, in part by
placing the device into a lower device
class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
PO 00000
[Amended]
099°45′41.00″
097°51′42.23″
096°46′52.02″
094°25′21.17″
092°35′44.93″
092°18′26.46″
091°22′30.62″
089°20′22.91″
088°56′54.86″
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe
this action will also enhance patients’
access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective November
23, 2021. The classification was
applicable on December 19, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cal
Rabang, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4633, Silver Spring,
MD, 20993–0002, 301–796–6412,
Cal.Rabang@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
17, 2021.
Michael R. Beckles,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations
Group.
AGENCY:
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
§ 71.1
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i)of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially
equivalent device (see section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act, defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On September 29, 2017, FDA received
Advanced Surgical Concepts Ltd.’s
request for De Novo classification of the
ContainOR. FDA reviewed the request
in order to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see section 513(a)(1)(B)
of the FD&C Act). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
66457
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on December 19, 2017,
FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 878.4825.1 We have named the
generic type of device general
laparoscopic power morcellation
containment system, and it is identified
as a prescription device consisting of an
instrument port and tissue containment
method that creates a working space
allowing for direct visualization during
a power morcellation procedure
following a laparoscopic procedure for
the excision of benign tissue that is not
suspected to contain malignancy.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
TABLE 1—GENERAL LAPAROSCOPIC POWER MORCELLATION CONTAINMENT SYSTEM RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Adverse tissue reaction ............................................................................
Infection ....................................................................................................
Intraperitoneal tissue dissemination .........................................................
• Material permeability.
• Improper function of containment device.
• Inadequate material strength.
• Physical trauma to liner caused by contact with morcellator or
grasper/tenaculum.
• Damage to liner (intentional or accidental) from instrument inserted through secondary port.
• Tearing during removal with loss of contents into abdominal cavity.
• Tearing of the bag due to stones contained in tissue.
• Use error.
Traumatic injury to non-target tissue/organ .............................................
• Active end of morcellator or grasper/tenaculum breaches liner.
• Loss of insufflation.
• Inadequate space to perform morcellation.
• Inadequate visualization of the laparoscopic instruments and tissue specimen relative to the external viscera.
• Use error.
Hernia through abdominal wall incision ...................................................
Prolongation of procedure and exposure to anesthesia ..........................
Biocompatibility evaluation.
Sterilization validation, Shelf life testing, and Labeling.
Non-clinical performance testing, Animal performance testing, Shelf life
testing, Labeling, and Training.
Non-clinical performance testing, Animal performance testing, Labeling,
and Training.
Labeling and Training.
Labeling and Training.
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. We encourage sponsors to consult
with us if they wish to use a non-animal
testing method they believe is suitable,
adequate, validated, and feasible. We
will consider if such an alternative
method could be assessed for
equivalency to an animal test method.
This device is subject to premarket
notification requirements under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act.
1 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Nov 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
66458
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
At the time of classification, general
laparoscopic power morcellation
containment systems are for
prescription use only. Prescription
devices are exempt from the
requirement for adequate directions for
use for the layperson under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as
the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are
met.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulations, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 878 is
amended as follows:
PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC
SURGERY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 878
continues to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Nov 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 878.4825 to subpart E to read
as follows:
■
§ 878.4825 General laparoscopic power
morcellation containment system.
(a) Identification. A general
laparoscopic power morcellation
containment system is a prescription
device consisting of an instrument port
and tissue containment method that
creates a working space allowing for
direct visualization during a power
morcellation procedure following a
laparoscopic procedure for the excision
of benign tissue that is not suspected to
contain malignancy.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Performance testing must
demonstrate the sterility of patientcontacting components of the device.
(3) Performance data must support the
shelf life of the device by demonstrating
continued sterility, package integrity,
and device functionality over the
intended shelf life.
(4) Non-clinical performance data
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be
tested:
(i) Demonstration of the device
impermeability to tissue, cells, and
fluids;
(ii) Demonstration that the device
allows for the insertion/withdrawal of
laparoscopic instruments while
maintaining pneumoperitoneum;
(iii) Demonstration that the
containment system provides adequate
space to perform morcellation and
adequate visualization of the
laparoscopic instruments and tissue
specimen relative to the external
viscera;
(iv) Demonstration that compatible
laparoscopic instruments and
morcellators do not compromise the
integrity of the containment system; and
(v) Demonstration that users can
adequately deploy the device,
morcellate a specimen without
compromising the integrity of the
device, and remove the device without
spillage of contents.
(5) Training must be developed and
validated to ensure users can follow the
instructions for use.
(6) Labeling must include:
(i) A contraindication for use in
gynecological procedures;
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(ii) A contraindication against use of
tissue that is known or suspected to
contain malignancy;
(iii) The following boxed warning:
‘‘Warning: Information regarding the
potential risks of a procedure with this
device should be shared with patients.
The use of laparoscopic power
morcellators may spread cancer. The
use of this containment system has not
been clinically demonstrated to reduce
this risk;’’
(iv) A statement limiting use of device
to physicians who have completed the
training program; and
(v) A shelf life.
Dated: November 17, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–25585 Filed 11–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 0
[Directive No. 2021–001]
Designation of Authority
Office of the Assistant Attorney
General, Criminal Division, Department
of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Attorney General has
authorized the Assistant Attorney
General for the Criminal Division to
perform the functions of the
‘‘Designated Authority’’ under executive
agreements between the United States
and other countries on access to data by
foreign governments and to delegate that
authority to certain officials in the
Office of International Affairs (‘‘OIA’’).
Consistent with that authorization, the
Assistant Attorney General for the
Criminal Division delegates authority to
perform the functions of the Designated
Authority pursuant to such agreements
to the Deputy Assistant Attorneys
General, Criminal Division, and the
Director, Deputy Directors and the
Associate Director supervising the
implementation of such agreements in
OIA.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective November 23, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vaughn Ary, Director, Office of
International Affairs, Criminal Division,
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington,
DC 20005; Telephone (202) 514–0000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Congress
authorized the United States to enter
into executive agreements with foreign
governments under which the parties
afford each other reciprocal rights of
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 23, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66456-66458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25585]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1913]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices;
Classification of the General Laparoscopic Power Morcellation
Containment System
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying
the general laparoscopic power morcellation containment system into
class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the
device type are identified in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the general laparoscopic power morcellation
containment system's classification. We are taking this action because
we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special
controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective November 23, 2021. The classification
was applicable on December 19, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cal Rabang, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4633, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, 301-796-6412,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the general laparoscopic power
morcellation containment system as class II (special controls), which
we have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by placing the
device into a lower device class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device
is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of the
procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person
[[Page 66457]]
then requests a classification under section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo
process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that
type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i)of the FD&C
Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval application to market a
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the
less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On September 29, 2017, FDA received Advanced Surgical Concepts
Ltd.'s request for De Novo classification of the ContainOR. FDA
reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the criteria
for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see section 513(a)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act). After
review of the information submitted in the request, we determined that
the device can be classified into class II with the establishment of
special controls. FDA has determined that these special controls, in
addition to the general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of
the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on December 19, 2017, FDA issued an order to the
requester classifying the device into class II. In this final order,
FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
878.4825.\1\ We have named the generic type of device general
laparoscopic power morcellation containment system, and it is
identified as a prescription device consisting of an instrument port
and tissue containment method that creates a working space allowing for
direct visualization during a power morcellation procedure following a
laparoscopic procedure for the excision of benign tissue that is not
suspected to contain malignancy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--General Laparoscopic Power Morcellation Containment System
Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adverse tissue reaction................ Biocompatibility evaluation.
Infection.............................. Sterilization validation, Shelf
life testing, and Labeling.
Intraperitoneal tissue dissemination... Non-clinical performance
testing, Animal performance
testing, Shelf life
Material permeability. testing, Labeling, and
Training.
Improper function of
containment device.
Inadequate material
strength.
Physical trauma to liner
caused by contact with morcellator
or grasper/tenaculum.
Damage to liner
(intentional or accidental) from
instrument inserted through
secondary port.
Tearing during removal
with loss of contents into
abdominal cavity.
Tearing of the bag due to
stones contained in tissue.
Use error.
Traumatic injury to non-target tissue/ Non-clinical performance
organ. testing, Animal performance
testing, Labeling,
Active end of morcellator and Training.
or grasper/tenaculum breaches
liner.
Loss of insufflation.
Inadequate space to
perform morcellation.
Inadequate visualization
of the laparoscopic instruments
and tissue specimen relative to
the external viscera.
Use error.
Hernia through abdominal wall incision. Labeling and Training.
Prolongation of procedure and exposure Labeling and Training.
to anesthesia.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. We encourage sponsors to consult with us if they wish to
use a non-animal testing method they believe is suitable, adequate,
validated, and feasible. We will consider if such an alternative method
could be assessed for equivalency to an animal test method. This device
is subject to premarket notification requirements under section 510(k)
of the FD&C Act.
[[Page 66458]]
At the time of classification, general laparoscopic power
morcellation containment systems are for prescription use only.
Prescription devices are exempt from the requirement for adequate
directions for use for the layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the
conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part
820, regarding quality system regulations, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and
under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR
part 878 is amended as follows:
PART 878--GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 878 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 878.4825 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 878.4825 General laparoscopic power morcellation containment
system.
(a) Identification. A general laparoscopic power morcellation
containment system is a prescription device consisting of an instrument
port and tissue containment method that creates a working space
allowing for direct visualization during a power morcellation procedure
following a laparoscopic procedure for the excision of benign tissue
that is not suspected to contain malignancy.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) The patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Performance testing must demonstrate the sterility of patient-
contacting components of the device.
(3) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by
demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device
functionality over the intended shelf life.
(4) Non-clinical performance data must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Demonstration of the device impermeability to tissue, cells,
and fluids;
(ii) Demonstration that the device allows for the insertion/
withdrawal of laparoscopic instruments while maintaining
pneumoperitoneum;
(iii) Demonstration that the containment system provides adequate
space to perform morcellation and adequate visualization of the
laparoscopic instruments and tissue specimen relative to the external
viscera;
(iv) Demonstration that compatible laparoscopic instruments and
morcellators do not compromise the integrity of the containment system;
and
(v) Demonstration that users can adequately deploy the device,
morcellate a specimen without compromising the integrity of the device,
and remove the device without spillage of contents.
(5) Training must be developed and validated to ensure users can
follow the instructions for use.
(6) Labeling must include:
(i) A contraindication for use in gynecological procedures;
(ii) A contraindication against use of tissue that is known or
suspected to contain malignancy;
(iii) The following boxed warning: ``Warning: Information regarding
the potential risks of a procedure with this device should be shared
with patients. The use of laparoscopic power morcellators may spread
cancer. The use of this containment system has not been clinically
demonstrated to reduce this risk;''
(iv) A statement limiting use of device to physicians who have
completed the training program; and
(v) A shelf life.
Dated: November 17, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-25585 Filed 11-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P