Program Fraud Civil Remedies, 66497-66498 [2021-25345]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 23, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Cancellation of public hearing
on proposed rulemaking.
ACTION:
This document cancels a
public hearing on proposed
amendments to the regulations on user
fees for the special enrollment
examinations for enrolled agents and
enrolled retirement plan agents.
DATES: The public hearing, originally
scheduled for Tuesday, November 23,
2021 at 10:00 a.m. is cancelled.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina Johnson of the Publications and
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division, Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration) at (202)
317–5177 (not a toll-free number) or at
publichearings@irs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice
of proposed rulemaking and notice of
public hearing that appeared in the
Federal Register on Wednesday,
September 29, 2021 (86 FR 53893)
announced that a public hearing to be
held by teleconference was scheduled
for Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at
10:00 a.m. The subject of the public
hearing is under section 9701 of Title 31
of the United States Code.
The public comment period for these
regulations expired on November 15,
2021. The notice of proposed
rulemaking and notice of hearing
instructed those interested in testifying
at the public hearing to submit a request
to speak and an outline of the topics to
be discussed. Requests to speak and
outlines were due on November 15,
2021. As of the end of the day on
November 15, 2021, no one requested to
speak. Therefore, the public hearing
scheduled for November 23, 2021 at
10:00 a.m. is cancelled.
SUMMARY:
Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,
Branch Chief, Publications and Regulations
Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate
Chief Counsel, Procedure and
Administration).
[FR Doc. 2021–25419 Filed 11–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 16
Program Fraud Civil Remedies
Departmental Offices, Treasury.
Proposed rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice of proposed
rulemaking would update the definition
of ‘‘investigating official’’ in the
Department’s Program Fraud
regulations. The definition would be
revised to include inspectors general
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Nov 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
that have been established since the
Program Fraud regulations were
implemented.
DATES: Comment due date: January 7,
2022.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments
electronically through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments can be
mailed to: Office of the General Counsel,
General Law, Ethics & Regulation, 1500
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20220, ATTN: Program Fraud
Proposed Rule. Because postal mail may
be subject to processing delay, it is
recommended that comments be
submitted electronically.
In general, comments received will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov
without change, including any business
or personal information provided.
Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, will be part of the public
record and subject to public disclosure.
Do not enclose any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Sonfield, Assistant General
Counsel for General Law, Ethics &
Regulation at (202) 622–9804.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department promulgated
implementing regulations for the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of
1986 (Act) (31 U.S.C. 3801 through
3812) on September 17, 1987 (52 FR
35071). The Act generally provides that
any person who knowingly submits a
false claim or statement to the Federal
Government may be liable for an
administrative civil penalty for each
false claim or statement, and, in certain
cases, to an assessment equal to double
the amount falsely claimed.
The Act vests authority to investigate
allegations of liability under its
provisions in an agency’s investigating
official. Based upon the results of an
investigation, the agency reviewing
official determines, with the
concurrence of the Attorney General,
whether to refer the matter to a
presiding officer for an administrative
hearing. Any penalty or assessment
imposed under the Act may be collected
by the Attorney General, through the
filing of a civil action, or by offsetting
amounts other than tax refunds, owed
the particular party by the federal
government.
The Act grants agency investigating
officials authority to require by
subpoena the production of
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66497
documentary evidence which is ‘‘not
otherwise reasonably available.’’ If the
case proceeds to hearing, the presiding
officer may require the attendance and
testimony of witnesses as well as the
production of documentary evidence.
The Department of the Treasury
adopted implementing regulations at 31
CFR part 16, which designated the
Department’s Assistant Secretary for
Management as the authority head,
designated the Department’s Inspector
General as the investigating official, and
assigned the role of reviewing official to
the General Counsel or designee.
This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule would revise the
definition of investigating official in
§ 16.2. Since the regulations were
promulgated in 1987, three inspectors
general have been established including
the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration (See Internal Revenue
Service Restructuring and Reform Act of
1998, Pub. L. 105–206, 112 Stat. 685),
the Special Inspector General for the
Troubled Asset Relief Program (See
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
of 2008, Pub. L. 110–343, 122 Stat.
3765), and the Special Inspector General
for Pandemic Recovery (See
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act, Pub. L. 116–136, 134 Stat.
281). The proposed revision would
define investigating official as any
Inspector General, including any
Special Inspector General, with
investigatory authority over programs of
the Department of the Treasury.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires agencies to
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) to determine the
economic impact of the rule on small
entities. A small entity is defined as
either a small business, a small
organization, or a small governmental
jurisdiction; an individual is not a small
entity. Section 605(b) of the RFA allows
an agency to prepare a certification in
lieu of an IRFA if the rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), it is hereby
certified that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule is limited to updating
the definition of investigating official for
program fraud investigations in order to
reflect current law. Accordingly, this
rule, if finalized, will have no direct
impacts on small entities.
Notwithstanding this certification, the
Department invites comments on the
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
66498
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 23, 2021 / Proposed Rules
impact this rule would have on small
entities.
PART 16—REGULATIONS
IMPLEMENTING THE PROGRAM
FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT OF 1986
Regulatory Planning and Review
■
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Laurie Schaffer,
Acting General Counsel.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs
and benefits and take certain other
actions before issuing a rule that
includes any federal mandate that may
result in expenditures in any one year
by a state, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. This regulation
does not include any federal mandate
that may result in expenditures by state,
local, or tribal governments, or by the
private sector in excess of that
threshold.
Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (titled
Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial, direct compliance costs on
state and local governments, and is not
required by statute, or preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This
rule does not have federalism
implications and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments or preempt
state law, within the meaning of the
Executive order.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 16
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
1. The authority citation for part 16
continues to read as follows:
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866.
Administrative practice and
procedure, Fraud, Investigations,
Organizations and functions
(Government agencies), Penalties.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the
Treasury proposes to amend 31 CFR
part 16 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Nov 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3801–3812.
2. In § 16.2, revise the definition of
‘‘Investigating official’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 16.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Investigating official means any
Inspector General, including any
Special Inspector General, with
investigatory authority over programs of
the Department of the Treasury, as
applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–25345 Filed 11–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AK–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 294
RIN 0596–AD51
Special Areas; Roadless Area
Conservation; National Forest System
Lands in Alaska
Forest Service, (Agriculture)
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
On January 20, 2021,
President Biden ordered all executive
departments and agencies to
immediately review and, as appropriate
and consistent with applicable law, take
action to address the promulgation of
Federal regulations during the last 4
years that may conflict with protecting
the environment, and to immediately
commence work to confront the climate
crisis (Executive Order 13990). In
addition, on January 26, 2021, President
Biden directed all Federal agencies to
review tribal consultation policies and
practices and recommit to more robust
nation-to-nation relationships and
respect for our Federal trust
responsibilities. Consistent with these
Presidential directives, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA or
Department), proposes to repeal a final
rule promulgated in 2020 that exempted
the Tongass National Forest (Tongass or
the Forest) from the 2001 Roadless Area
Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The 2001 Roadless Rule prohibited
timber harvest and road construction or
reconstruction within designated
Inventoried Roadless Areas, with
limited exceptions. Repealing the
Subpart E exemption would reinstate
application of the 2001 Roadless Rule to
the Tongass (as provided for in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Alaska’s
Judgment in Organized Village of Kake
v. USDA. USDA invites written
comments on the proposed rule and
associated documents. Substantive
comments received during the comment
period will be considered in developing
the final rule.
DATES: Written comments must be
received or postmarked by January 24,
2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Preferred: Federal eRulemaking
Portal www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Alaska Roadless Rule, USDA
Forest Service, P.O. Box 21628, Juneau,
Alaska 99802–1628.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Alaska
Roadless Rule, USDA Forest Service,
709 W 9th Street, Juneau, Alaska 99802.
• Email: sm.fs.akrdlessrule@usda.gov.
All comments received will be posted
to www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. The
public may inspect comments received
at www.regulations.gov. Do not submit
any information you consider to be
private, Confidential Business
Information (CBI), or other information,
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Krueger, Interdisciplinary Team Leader,
at 202–649–1189. Individuals using
telecommunication devices for the deaf/
hard-of-hearing (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Services at 1–
800–877–8339, 24 hours a day, every
day of the year, including holidays. You
may also review information related to
this rulemaking at the following
website: www.fs.usda.gov/project/
?project=60904.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Tongass is 16.7 million acres and
stretches roughly 500 miles northwest
from Ketchikan to Yakutat, Alaska. It
includes approximately 80 percent of
the land area in Southeast Alaska. The
Southeast Alaska region has about
75,000 people living in more than 30
towns and villages located in and
around the Forest, most of which are
located on islands or along the narrow
coastal strip. The Tongass supports
thriving ecosystems that provide food
security, as well as cultural, spiritual,
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 23, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66497-66498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25345]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 16
Program Fraud Civil Remedies
AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice of proposed rulemaking would update the definition
of ``investigating official'' in the Department's Program Fraud
regulations. The definition would be revised to include inspectors
general that have been established since the Program Fraud regulations
were implemented.
DATES: Comment due date: January 7, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments electronically through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments can be mailed
to: Office of the General Counsel, General Law, Ethics & Regulation,
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220, ATTN: Program Fraud
Proposed Rule. Because postal mail may be subject to processing delay,
it is recommended that comments be submitted electronically.
In general, comments received will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov without change, including any business or personal
information provided. Comments received, including attachments and
other supporting materials, will be part of the public record and
subject to public disclosure. Do not enclose any information in your
comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Sonfield, Assistant General
Counsel for General Law, Ethics & Regulation at (202) 622-9804.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department promulgated implementing regulations for the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (Act) (31 U.S.C. 3801 through 3812) on
September 17, 1987 (52 FR 35071). The Act generally provides that any
person who knowingly submits a false claim or statement to the Federal
Government may be liable for an administrative civil penalty for each
false claim or statement, and, in certain cases, to an assessment equal
to double the amount falsely claimed.
The Act vests authority to investigate allegations of liability
under its provisions in an agency's investigating official. Based upon
the results of an investigation, the agency reviewing official
determines, with the concurrence of the Attorney General, whether to
refer the matter to a presiding officer for an administrative hearing.
Any penalty or assessment imposed under the Act may be collected by the
Attorney General, through the filing of a civil action, or by
offsetting amounts other than tax refunds, owed the particular party by
the federal government.
The Act grants agency investigating officials authority to require
by subpoena the production of documentary evidence which is ``not
otherwise reasonably available.'' If the case proceeds to hearing, the
presiding officer may require the attendance and testimony of witnesses
as well as the production of documentary evidence.
The Department of the Treasury adopted implementing regulations at
31 CFR part 16, which designated the Department's Assistant Secretary
for Management as the authority head, designated the Department's
Inspector General as the investigating official, and assigned the role
of reviewing official to the General Counsel or designee.
This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule would revise the definition of investigating
official in Sec. 16.2. Since the regulations were promulgated in 1987,
three inspectors general have been established including the Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Administration (See Internal Revenue Service
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685),
the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program
(See Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110-343, 122
Stat. 3765), and the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery
(See Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, Pub. L. 116-
136, 134 Stat. 281). The proposed revision would define investigating
official as any Inspector General, including any Special Inspector
General, with investigatory authority over programs of the Department
of the Treasury.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
requires agencies to prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA) to determine the economic impact of the rule on small entities.
A small entity is defined as either a small business, a small
organization, or a small governmental jurisdiction; an individual is
not a small entity. Section 605(b) of the RFA allows an agency to
prepare a certification in lieu of an IRFA if the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), it is hereby certified that this
regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The proposed rule is limited to updating the
definition of investigating official for program fraud investigations
in order to reflect current law. Accordingly, this rule, if finalized,
will have no direct impacts on small entities. Notwithstanding this
certification, the Department invites comments on the
[[Page 66498]]
impact this rule would have on small entities.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take certain
other actions before issuing a rule that includes any federal mandate
that may result in expenditures in any one year by a state, local, or
tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. This
regulation does not include any federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, or tribal governments, or by the private
sector in excess of that threshold.
Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (titled Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either
imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on state and local
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts state law,
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of
section 6 of the Executive order. This rule does not have federalism
implications and does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments or preempt state law, within the meaning of
the Executive order.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 16
Administrative practice and procedure, Fraud, Investigations,
Organizations and functions (Government agencies), Penalties.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Treasury proposes to amend 31 CFR part 16 as follows:
PART 16--REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES
ACT OF 1986
0
1. The authority citation for part 16 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812.
0
2. In Sec. 16.2, revise the definition of ``Investigating official''
to read as follows:
Sec. 16.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Investigating official means any Inspector General, including any
Special Inspector General, with investigatory authority over programs
of the Department of the Treasury, as applicable.
* * * * *
Laurie Schaffer,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2021-25345 Filed 11-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P