Suspension of Reporting and Collection Requirements for Washington Apricots, 66462-66464 [2021-25277]
Download as PDF
66462
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 86, No. 223
Tuesday, November 23, 2021
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–21–0066; SC21–922–1
PR]
Suspension of Reporting and
Collection Requirements for
Washington Apricots
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule invites
comments on a recommendation from
the State of Washington Apricot
Marketing Committee (Committee) to
suspend the reporting and assessment
requirements prescribed under the
marketing order regulating apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington (Marketing Order No. 922).
In a separate meeting, the Committee
also unanimously recommended
terminating Marketing Order No. 922.
This rule proposes to indefinitely
suspend the assessment and associated
reporting requirements of the marketing
order during the period that the USDA
is processing the termination request.
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 24, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be submitted to the Docket Clerk
electronically by Email:
MarketingOrderComment@usda.gov or
internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposal
will be included in the record and will
be made available to the public. Please
be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Nov 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua R. Wilde, Marketing Specialist,
or Gary Olson, Regional Director,
Western Region Branch, Market
Development Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503)
326–2724 or Email: Joshua.R.Wilde@
usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Market Development Division, Specialty
Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491 or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 922, as amended (7 CFR part 922),
regulating the handling of apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington. Part 922 (referred to as the
‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Committee locally administers the
Order and is comprised of producers
and handlers operating within the
production area.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866 and 13563. Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review.
In addition, this proposed rule has
been reviewed under Executive Order
13175—Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments, which
requires agencies to consider whether
their rulemaking actions would have
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
tribal implications. AMS has
determined this proposed rule is
unlikely to have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to a marketing order
may file with USDA a petition stating
that the marketing order, any provision
of the marketing order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the
marketing order is not in accordance
with law and request a modification of
the marketing order or to be exempted
therefrom. A handler is afforded the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After the hearing, USDA would
rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United
States in any district in which the
handler is an inhabitant, or has his or
her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
The Committee meets regularly to
consider recommendations for
modification, suspension, or
termination of the Order’s regulatory
requirements. Committee meetings are
open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these
meetings. USDA reviews Committee
recommendations, including
information provided by the Committee
and from other available sources, and
determines whether modification,
suspension, or termination would tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the
Act.
On May 11, 2021, the Committee met
and deliberated over the continuance of
the Order. Following this meeting, the
Committee unanimously recommended
that USDA terminate the Order and
suspend the collection of assessments.
This proposed rule would indefinitely
suspend handler assessments as well as
any remaining reporting requirements of
the Order while USDA is processing the
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 23, 2021 / Proposed Rules
termination. The termination would be
conducted in a separate rulemaking
action.
Section 922.41 provides authority for
the Committee to assess handlers for
their pro rata share of the Committee
expenses authorized each fiscal period.
Section 922.60 authorizes the
Committee to collect reports and other
information necessary for the
Committee to perform its duties under
the Order. This rule proposes to
suspend § 922.235, which established a
continuing assessment rate of $2.86 per
ton, effective for the 2019–2020 and
subsequent fiscal periods. Any reports
that are currently being collected would
no longer be required.
The Order has been in effect since
1957 and has provided the apricot
industry in Washington with authority
for grade, size, quality, maturity, pack,
and container regulations, as well as
authority for mandatory product
inspection.
Handling regulations requiring
apricots to be inspected and meet
mandatory pack and container
requirements were in effect until 2007
and minimum grade, size, maturity, and
quality requirements until 2014.
Following a recommendation from the
Committee, USDA suspended the
container regulations for apricots for
one-year, effective April 6, 2006 (71 FR
16982), and subsequently extended that
suspension indefinitely effective August
1, 2007 (72 FR 16265). The Committee
believed that with changing market
dynamics container regulations were no
longer necessary to ensure orderly
marketing and that suspension would
provide greater flexibility to handlers
for packing and shipping apricots.
In 2013, based on the Committee’s
recommendation, USDA issued an
interim rule suspending the handling
regulations for apricots effective October
24, 2013 (78 FR 62936). A final rule
affirming the indefinite suspension
published in the Federal Register on
March 20, 2014 (79 FR 15539). Again,
the Committee believed the cost of
complying with the Order’s handling
and inspection requirements
outweighed the benefits to both
producers and handlers of apricots.
Both actions were unanimously
recommended by the Committee.
Following these regulatory
suspensions, the Committee continued
to levy assessments to maintain its
functionality. The Committee believed
that it should continue to fund its full
operational capability, collect industry
statistics on an ongoing basis, and
maintain the program in the event
market conditions warranted regulation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Nov 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
The Committee met on May 11, 2021,
to discuss market dynamics and the
Committee’s budget and assessments. A
significant decrease in the 2020–2021
crop production and increased
Committee expenses would require the
Committee to increase the assessment
rate by 365 percent, from $2.86 to
$13.30 per ton, to maintain its
functionality. During those discussions,
the Committee determined that the
suspension of handling and container
requirements had not adversely affected
the marketing of Washington apricots
rendering the Order no longer necessary
to the industry. The Committee
concluded that termination of the Order
would have no adverse effect on
industry. In preparing to terminate the
Order, the Committee recommended a
budget of expenditures of $5,508 for the
period beginning April 1, 2021, and
ending with the termination.
Following the May 11, 2021, meeting,
the Committee conducted a vote among
all its members to terminate the Order.
Termination of the Order was
unanimously supported by the
Committee. This proposed rule would
indefinitely suspend the handler
assessments and any reports being
collected, in preparation for the
termination of the Order.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
proposed rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act are unique in that they are brought
about through group action of
essentially small entities acting on their
own behalf.
There are approximately 315 growers
of Washington apricots and
approximately 8 apricot handlers in the
production area subject to regulation
under the Order. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts of less than
$30,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $1,000,000
(13 CFR 121.201).
Based on USDA National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) data, and
given the number of Washington apricot
growers, average grower revenue is
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66463
below $1,000,000. NASS’s 2020
Washington apricot price per ton of
$2,040 yields annual grower estimated
revenue of $3,321,120 which equals
approximately $10,543 average annual
receipts per grower ($2,040 price per ton
multiplied by 1,628 tons divided by 315
growers). Thus, most Washington
apricot growers would be considered
small businesses under the SBA
definition.
In addition, according to data from
USDA’s Market News, an estimated
Washington apricot 2020 season average
Free on Board (f.o.b.) shipper (handler)
price per carton was approximately
$31.59 (for Washington apricots, 2-layer
tray pack carton, all sizes, June–July
2020, midpoint of the ‘‘mostly low’’ and
‘‘mostly high’’ prices). With a standard
Market News weight of 18 pounds per
tray pack carton of apricots, the f.o.b.
price is approximately $1.755 per
pound, or $3,510 per ton ($31.59
divided by 18 pounds). The Committee
reported that the industry shipped 1,628
tons for the 2020 season. Total 2020
estimated handler receipts are $5.714
million (1,628 tons times $3,510 per
ton). Average annual receipts per
handler are approximately $714,000
($5.714 million divided by 8 handlers).
Thus, most Washington apricot handlers
would be considered small businesses
under the SBA definition.
This rule proposes to suspend the
assessment requirements of the Order
and any reports currently being
collected. The assessment rate that
would be suspended is the $2.86 per ton
rate in effect for the 2019–2020 fiscal
period and continuing to the present
day. The Committee also recommended
a budget of expenditures of $5,508 for
the period beginning April 1, 2021, and
ending with the termination of the
Order. The budget was based on the
Committee’s estimated financial
resources on March 31, 2021. Budgeted
expenditures include administrative
expenses and any expenses necessary to
finalize the termination of the Order.
On July 7, 2021, the Committee made
the recommendation to suspend the
remaining reporting and handler
assessments as an adjunct to the
recommendation to terminate the Order.
As such, the alternative discussed by
the Committee was to maintain the
status quo and continue to collect
handler assessments. The Committee
determined that the decrease in the
2020–2021 crop production and the
increases in Committee expenses would
require the Committee to increase the
assessment rate by 365 percent, from
$2.86 to $13.30 per ton. Further, the
2020–2021 crop production was the
smallest crop on record, and evidence
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
66464
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 23, 2021 / Proposed Rules
suggests that this decline is a
continuation of an industry trend.
In addition, the suspension of the
handling and packing regulations has
not adversely affected the marketing of
Washington apricots. Evidence from the
past 7 years showed that apricots can be
marketed from the production area in
the absence of the Order’s requirements
without a negative economic impact on
the industry.
After considering the alternative, the
Committee concluded that the cost to
maintain the Order outweighed its
benefit to producers and handlers and,
therefore, unanimously voted to
suspend the reporting requirements and
collection of assessments beginning
with 2021 fiscal period, and to
terminate the Order.
This action would suspend the
reporting and assessment obligations
imposed on handlers. When in effect,
assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of those costs
may be passed on to producers. The
suspension of the reporting and
assessment requirements would reduce
the regulatory burden on handlers and
would be expected to reduce the burden
on producers.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 Fruit
Crops. No changes are necessary in
those requirements because of this
proposed action. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule would not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
apricot handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The Committee’s meetings were
widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry, and all
interested persons are invited to attend
the meetings and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Meetings are held virtually or in a
hybrid style with participants having a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 Nov 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
choice whether to attend in person or
virtually.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Richard Lower at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part
922 as follows:
PART 922—APRICOTS GROWN IN
DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 922 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 922.235
[Stayed]
2. Section 922.235 is stayed
indefinitely.
■
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–25277 Filed 11–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
[NRC–2021–0194]
Guidance for Implementation of 10
CFR 50.59, ‘‘Changes, Tests and
Experiments,’’ at Non-Power
Production or Utilization Facilities
Non-power Production or Utilization
Facilities.’’ This DG describes an
approach that is acceptable to the NRC
staff to meet the regulatory requirements
‘‘Changes, tests and experiments,’’ at a
nonpower production and utilization
facility (NPUF), as defined in the DG.
DATES: Submit comments by December
23, 2021. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in
connection with items for inclusion in
guides currently being developed or
improvements in all published guides
are encouraged at any time.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods;
however, the NRC encourages electronic
comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2021–0194. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individuals listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• Mail comments to: Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, ATTN: Program Management,
Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Eudy, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research, telephone: 301–
415–3104, email: Michael.Eudy@nrc.gov
and Duane Hardesty, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, telephone: 301–
415–3724, email: Duane.Hardesty@
nrc.gov. Both are staff of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft regulatory guide; request
for comment.
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing for public
comment a draft regulatory guide (DG),
DG–2007, ‘‘Guidance for
Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59,
‘‘Changes, Tests and Experiments,’’ at
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2021–
0194 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Obtaining Information
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 23, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66462-66464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25277]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 23, 2021 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 66462]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-21-0066; SC21-922-1 PR]
Suspension of Reporting and Collection Requirements for
Washington Apricots
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on a recommendation from
the State of Washington Apricot Marketing Committee (Committee) to
suspend the reporting and assessment requirements prescribed under the
marketing order regulating apricots grown in designated counties in
Washington (Marketing Order No. 922). In a separate meeting, the
Committee also unanimously recommended terminating Marketing Order No.
922. This rule proposes to indefinitely suspend the assessment and
associated reporting requirements of the marketing order during the
period that the USDA is processing the termination request.
DATES: Comments must be received by January 24, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be submitted to the Docket
Clerk electronically by Email: [email protected] or
internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference
the document number and the date and page number of this issue of the
Federal Register and can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this proposal will be included in the
record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that
the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments
will be made public on the internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua R. Wilde, Marketing Specialist,
or Gary Olson, Regional Director, Western Region Branch, Market
Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone:
(503) 326-2724 or Email: [email protected] or
[email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491 or Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under
Marketing Order No. 922, as amended (7 CFR part 922), regulating the
handling of apricots grown in designated counties in Washington. Part
922 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally
administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers
operating within the production area.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects,
distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This action falls within
a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
In addition, this proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive
Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their
rulemaking actions would have tribal implications. AMS has determined
this proposed rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to a marketing order may file with USDA a
petition stating that the marketing order, any provision of the
marketing order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the
marketing order is not in accordance with law and request a
modification of the marketing order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
The Committee meets regularly to consider recommendations for
modification, suspension, or termination of the Order's regulatory
requirements. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA reviews
Committee recommendations, including information provided by the
Committee and from other available sources, and determines whether
modification, suspension, or termination would tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
On May 11, 2021, the Committee met and deliberated over the
continuance of the Order. Following this meeting, the Committee
unanimously recommended that USDA terminate the Order and suspend the
collection of assessments. This proposed rule would indefinitely
suspend handler assessments as well as any remaining reporting
requirements of the Order while USDA is processing the
[[Page 66463]]
termination. The termination would be conducted in a separate
rulemaking action.
Section 922.41 provides authority for the Committee to assess
handlers for their pro rata share of the Committee expenses authorized
each fiscal period. Section 922.60 authorizes the Committee to collect
reports and other information necessary for the Committee to perform
its duties under the Order. This rule proposes to suspend Sec.
922.235, which established a continuing assessment rate of $2.86 per
ton, effective for the 2019-2020 and subsequent fiscal periods. Any
reports that are currently being collected would no longer be required.
The Order has been in effect since 1957 and has provided the
apricot industry in Washington with authority for grade, size, quality,
maturity, pack, and container regulations, as well as authority for
mandatory product inspection.
Handling regulations requiring apricots to be inspected and meet
mandatory pack and container requirements were in effect until 2007 and
minimum grade, size, maturity, and quality requirements until 2014.
Following a recommendation from the Committee, USDA suspended the
container regulations for apricots for one-year, effective April 6,
2006 (71 FR 16982), and subsequently extended that suspension
indefinitely effective August 1, 2007 (72 FR 16265). The Committee
believed that with changing market dynamics container regulations were
no longer necessary to ensure orderly marketing and that suspension
would provide greater flexibility to handlers for packing and shipping
apricots.
In 2013, based on the Committee's recommendation, USDA issued an
interim rule suspending the handling regulations for apricots effective
October 24, 2013 (78 FR 62936). A final rule affirming the indefinite
suspension published in the Federal Register on March 20, 2014 (79 FR
15539). Again, the Committee believed the cost of complying with the
Order's handling and inspection requirements outweighed the benefits to
both producers and handlers of apricots. Both actions were unanimously
recommended by the Committee.
Following these regulatory suspensions, the Committee continued to
levy assessments to maintain its functionality. The Committee believed
that it should continue to fund its full operational capability,
collect industry statistics on an ongoing basis, and maintain the
program in the event market conditions warranted regulation.
The Committee met on May 11, 2021, to discuss market dynamics and
the Committee's budget and assessments. A significant decrease in the
2020-2021 crop production and increased Committee expenses would
require the Committee to increase the assessment rate by 365 percent,
from $2.86 to $13.30 per ton, to maintain its functionality. During
those discussions, the Committee determined that the suspension of
handling and container requirements had not adversely affected the
marketing of Washington apricots rendering the Order no longer
necessary to the industry. The Committee concluded that termination of
the Order would have no adverse effect on industry. In preparing to
terminate the Order, the Committee recommended a budget of expenditures
of $5,508 for the period beginning April 1, 2021, and ending with the
termination.
Following the May 11, 2021, meeting, the Committee conducted a vote
among all its members to terminate the Order. Termination of the Order
was unanimously supported by the Committee. This proposed rule would
indefinitely suspend the handler assessments and any reports being
collected, in preparation for the termination of the Order.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant
to the Act are unique in that they are brought about through group
action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 315 growers of Washington apricots and
approximately 8 apricot handlers in the production area subject to
regulation under the Order. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $30,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$1,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) data,
and given the number of Washington apricot growers, average grower
revenue is below $1,000,000. NASS's 2020 Washington apricot price per
ton of $2,040 yields annual grower estimated revenue of $3,321,120
which equals approximately $10,543 average annual receipts per grower
($2,040 price per ton multiplied by 1,628 tons divided by 315 growers).
Thus, most Washington apricot growers would be considered small
businesses under the SBA definition.
In addition, according to data from USDA's Market News, an
estimated Washington apricot 2020 season average Free on Board (f.o.b.)
shipper (handler) price per carton was approximately $31.59 (for
Washington apricots, 2-layer tray pack carton, all sizes, June-July
2020, midpoint of the ``mostly low'' and ``mostly high'' prices). With
a standard Market News weight of 18 pounds per tray pack carton of
apricots, the f.o.b. price is approximately $1.755 per pound, or $3,510
per ton ($31.59 divided by 18 pounds). The Committee reported that the
industry shipped 1,628 tons for the 2020 season. Total 2020 estimated
handler receipts are $5.714 million (1,628 tons times $3,510 per ton).
Average annual receipts per handler are approximately $714,000 ($5.714
million divided by 8 handlers). Thus, most Washington apricot handlers
would be considered small businesses under the SBA definition.
This rule proposes to suspend the assessment requirements of the
Order and any reports currently being collected. The assessment rate
that would be suspended is the $2.86 per ton rate in effect for the
2019-2020 fiscal period and continuing to the present day. The
Committee also recommended a budget of expenditures of $5,508 for the
period beginning April 1, 2021, and ending with the termination of the
Order. The budget was based on the Committee's estimated financial
resources on March 31, 2021. Budgeted expenditures include
administrative expenses and any expenses necessary to finalize the
termination of the Order.
On July 7, 2021, the Committee made the recommendation to suspend
the remaining reporting and handler assessments as an adjunct to the
recommendation to terminate the Order. As such, the alternative
discussed by the Committee was to maintain the status quo and continue
to collect handler assessments. The Committee determined that the
decrease in the 2020-2021 crop production and the increases in
Committee expenses would require the Committee to increase the
assessment rate by 365 percent, from $2.86 to $13.30 per ton. Further,
the 2020-2021 crop production was the smallest crop on record, and
evidence
[[Page 66464]]
suggests that this decline is a continuation of an industry trend.
In addition, the suspension of the handling and packing regulations
has not adversely affected the marketing of Washington apricots.
Evidence from the past 7 years showed that apricots can be marketed
from the production area in the absence of the Order's requirements
without a negative economic impact on the industry.
After considering the alternative, the Committee concluded that the
cost to maintain the Order outweighed its benefit to producers and
handlers and, therefore, unanimously voted to suspend the reporting
requirements and collection of assessments beginning with 2021 fiscal
period, and to terminate the Order.
This action would suspend the reporting and assessment obligations
imposed on handlers. When in effect, assessments are applied uniformly
on all handlers, and some of those costs may be passed on to producers.
The suspension of the reporting and assessment requirements would
reduce the regulatory burden on handlers and would be expected to
reduce the burden on producers.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189 Fruit Crops.
No changes are necessary in those requirements because of this proposed
action. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to
OMB for approval.
This rule would not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large apricot handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
The Committee's meetings were widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry, and all interested persons are invited to
attend the meetings and participate in Committee deliberations on all
issues. Meetings are held virtually or in a hybrid style with
participants having a choice whether to attend in person or virtually.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination is made on this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural
Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 922 as follows:
PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 922 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Sec. 922.235 [Stayed]
0
2. Section 922.235 is stayed indefinitely.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-25277 Filed 11-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P