Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Reclassification of Blood Lancets, 66180-66189 [2021-25376]
Download as PDF
66180
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Date PMA or notice of completion
of a PDP is required: A PMA or a notice
of completion of a PDP is required to be
filed with the Food and Drug
Administration on or before May 22,
2024, for any multiple use blood lancet
for multiple patient use described in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section that was
in commercial distribution before May
28, 1976, or that has, on or before May
22, 2024, been found to be substantially
equivalent to a multiple use blood
lancet for multiple patient use described
in paragraph (d)(1) of this section that
was in commercial distribution before
May 28, 1976. Any other multiple use
blood lancet for multiple patient use
shall have an approved PMA or a
declared completed PDP in effect before
being placed in commercial
distribution.
Dated: November 16, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–25381 Filed 11–19–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–0400]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic
Surgery Devices; Reclassification of
Blood Lancets
Food and Drug Administration,
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
AGENCY:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
issuing a final order to reclassify three
types of blood lancets used to puncture
skin to obtain a drop of blood for
diagnostic purposes from class I (general
controls) exempt from premarket
notification into class II (special
controls) and subject to premarket
notification, specifically, single use only
blood lancets with an integral sharps
injury prevention feature, single use
only blood lancets without an integral
sharps injury prevention feature, and
multiple use blood lancets for single
patient use only. FDA is designating
special controls for these three types of
blood lancets based on the
determination that general controls only
are not sufficient and there is sufficient
information to establish special controls
to provide a reasonable assurance of
their safety and effectiveness. FDA is
also reclassifying a fourth type of blood
lancet, multiple use blood lancets for
SUMMARY:
multiple patient use, from class I
(general controls) exempt from
premarket notification into class III
(premarket approval). FDA is
reclassifying these four types of blood
lancets on its own initiative based on
new information.
DATES: This order is effective November
22, 2021. See further discussion in
section VI, Implementation Strategy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Nipper, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1540,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
6527, Rebecca.Nipper@fda.hhs.gov; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240–402–
7911, Stephen.Ripley@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Table of Abbreviations/Commonly Used
Acronyms in This Document
II. Background
A. Classification
B. Reclassification
C. Requirement for Premarket Approval
III. Public Comments in Response to the
Proposed Order
IV. The Final Order
V. Premarket Notification Requirement for
Single Patient Use Only Blood Lancets
VI. Implementation Strategy
VII. Codification of Orders
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
X. References
I. Table of Abbreviations/Commonly
Used Acronyms in This Document
Abbreviation or acronym
What it means
510(k) .......................................................
515(b) Proposed Order ...........................
Premarket Notification.
Proposed Order calling for premarket approval applications for class III blood lancets published on
March 3, 2016 (81 FR 11151).
Proposed Order to reclassify blood lancets published on March 3, 2016 (81 FR 11140).
Food and Drug Administration.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Code of Federal Regulations.
Environmental Protection Agency.
Food and Drug Administration.
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act.
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Federal Register.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus.
Office of Management and Budget.
General & Plastic Surgery Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee, device classification panel on June 26, 2013.
Product Development Protocol.
Premarket Approval Application.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Prothrombin Time and International Normalized Ratio.
Reference.
Unique Device Identifier.
Universal Product Code.
United States Code.
513(e) Proposed Order ...........................
Agency .....................................................
CDC .........................................................
CFR .........................................................
EPA ..........................................................
FDA ..........................................................
FDASIA ....................................................
FD&C Act .................................................
FR ............................................................
HIV ...........................................................
OMB .........................................................
Panel ........................................................
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
PDP .........................................................
PMA .........................................................
PRA .........................................................
PT/INR .....................................................
Ref ...........................................................
UDI ...........................................................
UPC .........................................................
U.S.C .......................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
II. Background
A. Classification
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.),
as amended, established a
comprehensive system for the regulation
of medical devices intended for human
use. Section 513 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360c) established three categories
(classes) of devices, reflecting the
regulatory controls needed to provide
reasonable assurance of their safety and
effectiveness. The three categories of
devices are class I (general controls),
class II (special controls), and class III
(premarket approval).
Under section 513(d) of the FD&C Act,
devices that were in commercial
distribution before the enactment of the
1976 amendments on May 28, 1976
(generally referred to as
‘‘preamendments devices’’) are
classified after FDA has: (1) Received a
recommendation from a device
classification panel (an FDA advisory
committee); (2) published the panel’s
recommendation for comment, along
with a proposed regulation classifying
the device; and (3) published a final
regulation classifying the device. FDA
has classified most preamendments
devices under these procedures.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
B. Reclassification
Section 513(e)(1) of the FD&C Act sets
forth the process for issuing a final order
for reclassifying a device. Specifically,
prior to the issuance of a final order
reclassifying a device, the following
must occur: (1) Publication of a
proposed order in the Federal Register;
(2) a meeting of a device classification
panel described in section 513(b) of the
FD&C Act; and (3) consideration of
comments to a public docket.
FDA published a proposed order in
the Federal Register of March 3, 2016
(81 FR 11140), held a device
classification panel meeting of the
General & Plastic Surgery Devices Panel
of the Medical Devices Advisory
Committee, on June 26, 2013 (the
Panel), as described in section 513(b) of
the FD&C Act with respect to the four
different types of blood lancet devices,
and considered comments from public
dockets. Therefore, FDA has met the
requirements under section 513(e)(1) of
the FD&C Act.
C. Requirement for Premarket Approval
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, FDA has published a final
order requiring the filing of a premarket
approval application (PMA) or notice of
completion of a product development
protocol (PDP) for multiple patient
blood lancets (class III). In practice, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
option of filing a notice of completion
of a PDP has rarely been used by
manufacturers. For simplicity, while
corresponding requirements for PDPs
remain available to manufacturers in
response to a final order under section
515(b) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360e(b)), this document will refer only
to the requirement for the filing and
obtaining approval of a PMA.
III. Public Comments in Response to the
Proposed Order
In the Federal Register of March 3,
2016, FDA published a proposed order
to reclassify single patient use blood
lancets from class I (general controls)
exempt from premarket notification to
class II (special controls) and to
reclassify multiple patient blood lancets
from class I (general controls) exempt
from premarket notification to class III
(premarket approval) (513(e) Proposed
Order, 81 FR 11140)). On that same
date, FDA also published a proposed
order to require the filing of a PMA for
multiple patient blood lancets (515(b)
Proposed Order) (81 FR 11151). The
proposed orders also stated that FDA
proposed to amend 21 CFR part 878 to
create a separate regulation under
§ 878.4850 (21 CFR 878.4850) for all
blood lancet types (previously identified
with product codes FMK or JCA). The
comment periods for both proposed
orders closed on June 1, 2016.
The March 3, 2016, 513(e) Proposed
Order received approximately 150
comments from industry, professional
societies, trade organizations, and
individual consumers by the close of the
comment period. Certain comments
have been grouped together under a
single comment since the theme of the
comments are similar in nature. The
grouped comments and FDA’s response
to each grouping are summarized in this
section. The number assigned to each
comment is purely for organizational
purposes and does not signify the
comment’s value, importance, or the
order in which it was received.
As previously set forth in the 513(e)
Proposed Order, FDA identified the
following four subsets of blood lancet
devices:
1. A single use only blood lancet with
an integral sharps injury prevention
feature is a disposable blood lancet
intended for a single use that is
comprised of a single use blade attached
to a solid, non-reusable base (including
an integral sharps injury prevention
feature) that is used to puncture the skin
to obtain a drop of blood for diagnostic
purposes. The integral sharps injury
prevention feature allows the device to
be used once and then renders it
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66181
inoperable and incapable of further use
(‘‘subset 1’’);
2. A single use only blood lancet
without an integral sharps injury
prevention feature is a disposable blood
lancet intended for a single use that is
comprised of a single use blade attached
to a solid, non-reusable base that is used
to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of
blood for diagnostic purposes (‘‘subset
2’’);
3. A multiple use blood lancet for
single patient use only is a multiple use
capable blood lancet intended for use on
a single patient that is comprised of a
single use blade attached to a solid,
reusable base that is used to puncture
the skin to obtain a drop of blood for
diagnostic purposes (‘‘subset 3’’); and
4. A multiple use blood lancet for
multiple patient use is a multiple use
capable blood lancet intended for use on
multiple patients that is comprised of a
single use blade attached to a solid,
reusable base that is used to puncture
the skin to obtain a drop of blood for
diagnostic purposes (‘‘subset 4’’).
(Comment 1) Several comments
generally agreed with the proposed
reclassification of all four types of blood
lancet devices. Some comments
supported the proposed precautions and
labeling special controls as necessary for
healthcare providers and users of single
patient use blood lancets. Other
comments agreed that the risks to public
health associated with use of multiple
use blood lancets for multiple patients
are sufficiently significant for FDA to
reclassify this device type into class III
(premarket approval).
(Response 1) After considering the
Panel’s recommendations and
examination of scientific information
(Ref. 1, and previously described in the
513(e) Proposed Order (81 FR 11140 at
11142), FDA continues to believe that
there is sufficient evidence to establish
special controls that, together with
general controls, provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness to
reclassify single patient use only blood
lancets to class II, as initially specified
in the 513(e) Proposed Order. Further,
FDA continues to believe that blood
lancets for multiple patient use present
a potential for unreasonable risk of
illness or injury, that insufficient
information exists for FDA to determine
that special controls would provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device, and that
blood lancets for multiple patient use
should be reclassified into class III.
(Comment 2) Several comments stated
that the evidence for a risk of infection
was associated with the use of blood
lancets in a professional care setting and
therefore there was no evidence to
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
66182
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
support reclassification of personal
blood lancet devices in home use
environments.
(Response 2) FDA disagrees with the
comments that there is no evidence to
support the reclassification of single
patient use blood lancets for home use
from class I (general controls) to class II
(special controls). At the Panel meeting
on June 26, 2013, FDA presented an
analysis of the risks to health associated
with the use of blood lancets and new
scientific data supporting these risks
(Ref. 2). Although the information on
infection transmission was generated in
healthcare settings, FDA believes the
risks to health are general risks that
apply to all single use patient blood
lancets, regardless of the environment in
which they are used. Based on the
scientific evidence available to the
Agency at that time, blood may be
transmitted between patient and care
givers by the misuse of ‘‘single use
only’’ medical devices that are not
intended for or labeled for reuse,
because they are not designed to be
cleaned or sterilized to become safe for
reuse, such as needles or syringes (Ref.
2). Similarly, transmission may also
occur if validated cleaning and
disinfection instructions are not
identified and followed for multiple use
blood lancets for single patient use only
(subset 3). After reviewing the new
scientific data supporting the identified
risks to health, the Panel recommended
that reclassifying single patient use
blood lancets from class I (general
controls) to class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of
the safety and effectiveness of blood
lancets for single patient use.
The Panel also acknowledged that
many of the adverse event reports of
device problems indicate that accidental
sticks are most likely when safety
features malfunction, the lancet is
difficult to remove, or when lancets are
too dull to pierce the skin or too long
to fit within the safety caps (Ref. 2).
From January 1, 2015, to May 31, 2021,
FDA received over 3,100 reports for
blood lancets, most of which are device
malfunctions. The most commonly
reported problems include accidental
blade sticks, the blade breaking off or
remaining in a patient’s finger, and the
blade protruding from the device cap or
not retracting. In addition, FDA received
numerous reports of device
malfunctioning and retraction problems
with the blood lancets.
FDA agrees with the Panel that
reclassification from class I to class II is
appropriate for single patient use blood
lancets and is supported by FDA’s
findings reported in the 513(e) Proposed
Order, adverse event reporting, and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
panel executive summary (Ref. 2). FDA
also agrees with the Panel that
premarket notification (510(k))
submissions are necessary for single
patient use blood lancets to ensure
adequacy of the labeling concerning the
limitation to single patient use only,
effective sharps injury prevention
features that disable the lancet from
further use (when applicable), and blade
dispense release mechanisms on
multiple use blood lancets for single
patient use only, as well as instructions
for a safe blade disposal and cleaning
and disinfection for the multiple use
blood lancets for single patient use only.
These special controls are consistent
with the special controls applicable to
other similar device technology such as
injection needles (Ref. 2). As a result,
FDA believes the premarket notification
requirement and the established special
controls are necessary to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness for all for single patient
use blood lancets, whether they are used
in a home environment or a healthcare
setting.
(Comment 3) Several comments stated
that the 513(e) Proposed Order, if
finalized, would increase the cost of
blood lancets for single patient use,
putting an undue burden on patients,
and would cause what one comment
referred to as ‘‘economic driven
disruption . . . with lancet access
driving use of less expensive devices’’
in the wrong setting.
(Response 3) FDA appreciates the
economic concerns raised by users of
blood lancets regarding the cost of this
device; however, reclassification
decisions are based on the level of
controls necessary to ensure that
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness requirements under 21
CFR 860.7(d) and (e) as well as section
513(e) of the FD&C Act are met. The
regulatory requirements for blood
lancets established by FDA are based on
the probable benefits to health for the
indications for use of blood lancet
devices and the risk of the devices when
used as intended, and not the costs of
the device. FDA also agrees with the
findings of the Panel and believes that
to mitigate the known risks to health
posed by these devices, the proposed
special controls are necessary for single
patient use only blood lancets,
regardless of their environment of use.
In addition, FDA believes that
manufacturers of single patient use only
blood lancets may already be complying
with some of the proposed special
controls (e.g., biocompatibility testing
and package integrity testing) because
they are industry standard type tests
(Ref. 2). Therefore, FDA does not believe
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the reclassification of single patient use
only blood lancets (subsets 1, 2, or 3)
will result in an economic disruption
that will affect the availability of or
patient access to these devices for these
intended purposes.
(Comment 4) Several comments stated
that the proposed special controls
related to the disinfection of skin and/
or reusable device components for
single patient use blood lancets (subsets
1, 2, or 3), along with the associated
special controls concerning labeling and
validation, were either too burdensome
or not appropriate. For example, one
comment did not understand why
disinfection was needed for a single
patient home use device; a similar
comment felt that cleaning and
disinfection validation was overly
burdensome for single patient home use
devices. A few comments stated that
disinfection of the skin would adversely
affect blood glucose monitoring by
resulting in vasoconstriction. Also, one
comment suggested that FDA should not
mandate usage of Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) commercially
registered disinfectant if a commonly
available generic disinfectant agent is
equally effective for home use.
(Response 4) FDA believes that the
special controls related to the
disinfection of reusable device
components, along with the associated
special controls pertaining to labeling
and validation, are appropriate to
ensure a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness for multiple use blood
lancets for single patient use (i.e., subset
3). To reduce the risk of infection, FDA
believes that reusable components of
single patient use lancets, such as
reusable bases, should be adequately
cleaned and disinfected (i.e.,
reprocessed) between uses. Without
adequate reprocessing validation
conducted initially by the manufacturer
for multiple use blood lancets for single
patient use under simulated use
conditions, it is unclear whether
adequate labeling for cleaning and
disinfection between uses by the end
user can be developed. Further, patient
soil (e.g., skin cells, oil, dirt, skin flora,
and body fluids such as blood and
sweat) can accumulate on the reusable
component over time, creating an ideal
environment for microbial growth.
Although the lancet may be for single
patient use, soil can become transferred
from the reusable base component to the
single-use lancet, thereby posing a risk
of infection upon reuse of the device in
the same patient.
At the Panel meeting, FDA presented
an analysis of the risks to health
associated with the use of blood lancets
and new scientific data supporting these
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
risks. Beyond mitigating the risk of
infection, the Panel felt that
reprocessing validation was necessary to
demonstrate the functionality of the
device over its lifetime, since the device
could degrade when subjected to
multiple cleaning and disinfection
cycles (Ref. 2). FDA’s guidance entitled
‘‘Reprocessing Medical Devices in
Health Care Settings: Validation
Methods and Labeling’’ provides
recommendations for validation
methods and labeling for proper
cleaning of reusable medical devices
that are consistent with the special
controls in this final order (Ref. 3).
Furthermore, the special controls for
proper cleaning and disinfection of
reusable components in this final order
are also consistent with the
recommendations in FDA’s guidances
‘‘Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test
Systems for Over-the-Counter Use’’ and
‘‘Blood Glucose Monitoring Test
Systems for Prescription Point-of-Care
Use,’’ which concern devices that are
used by some of the same patient
populations as those using blood
lancets, both in a home use and clinical
environment (Refs. 1 and 4).
FDA continues to believe that use of
EPA-registered disinfectants is
necessary for cleaning and disinfection
of the multiple use blood lancets for
single patient use even for home use
settings. FDA recommends utilizing
disinfectants that are effective against
bloodborne pathogens, such as Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV),
Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C viruses.
FDA also recommends the use of EPAregistered disinfectants because they
have been demonstrated to be effective
against specific bloodborne pathogens
when used for specified contact times.
EPA-registered disinfectants, which
include both commercially registered
disinfectants and commonly available
generic disinfectant agents, are not
allowed to make efficacy claims against
specific pathogens unless the EPA has
reviewed data to support those claims.
FDA notes that preparation of skin is
part of standard patient care prior to
drawing blood from patients, and that
current guidelines and standards (Refs.
5 and 6) generally include cleaning and
disinfection of skin prior to capillary
blood sampling. The purpose of this
skin preparation step is to prevent
infections caused by entry of microbial
flora on the patient’s skin into the
puncture wound created by the blood
lancet. Nonetheless, FDA recognizes
that the skin preparation procedure may
differ depending on the particular
application and/or clinical use, and that
specific guidelines may exist for skin
preparation for certain clinical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
applications. As such, FDA has revised
the special control regarding
‘‘instructions on cleaning and
disinfection of the skin to be pierced’’
to instead state ‘‘instructions on
preparation (e.g., cleaning, disinfection)
of the skin to be pierced.’’
As a result of the available scientific
information, FDA has determined that
labeling special controls are necessary
to address safety risks associated with
use as labeled, and possible misuse, of
blood lancets. In particular, it is critical
to have specific required labeling
special controls related to the
preparation of skin and reprocessing of
blood lancets for single patient use
devices to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness.
(Comment 5) Several comments stated
that the proposed labeling for single
patient use only blood lancet devices is
inadequate, overly prescriptive, and/or
unnecessary for blood lancets used in
home use environments.
(Response 5) FDA continues to
believe that the labeling proposed as
special controls for single patient use
only blood lancets (subsets 1, 2, and 3)
are necessary to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness for
these devices and believes the current
labeling for blood lancets is inadequate.
At the Panel meeting, FDA presented an
analysis of the risks to health associated
with the use of blood lancets and new
scientific data supporting these risks. In
the data that was presented, it was
shown that the risk of bloodborne
pathogen transmission was related to
the improper use of blood lancets. FDA
believes that additional labeling is
needed to address this safety risk
associated with misuse of blood lancets,
including detailed descriptions of the
proper use of the device and any sharps
injury prevention feature, hand washing
instructions for the user before and after
use of the device, instructions on
cleaning and disinfection of the device
and to the skin to be pierced, and
instructions for the safe disposal of the
device (Ref. 2). For each environment of
use for blood lancets, adequate labeling
must be included to address either use
of these devices in healthcare settings or
labeling for home use that is written for
the end users to be able to understand
and follow the instructions.
FDA has determined that general
controls alone are not sufficient to
provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effective for these devices (subsets
1, 2, and 3), and there is sufficient
information to establish special controls
to provide such an assurance; therefore,
FDA is reclassifying these devices into
class II (81 FR 11140 at 11142). The
Panel consensus was that single patient
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66183
use only blood lancets meet the
statutory definition of a class II device
and require labeling special controls
related to the cleaning and disinfection
of skin and blood lancets for single
patient use devices to reasonably assure
safety and effectiveness.
(Comment 6) Some comments stated
that the proposed 180-day timeframe is
too short for manufacturers of single
patient use blood lancets (subsets 1 to
3) to demonstrate conformance with the
required special controls and submit a
premarket notification (510(k)). The
comments recommended timeframes
ranging from 1 to 2 years for the
submission of new 510(k)s for these
types of blood lancets.
(Response 6) FDA agrees with the
commenters’ concern that its proposal
to not enforce compliance with the
510(k) requirement or special controls
for single patient use only blood lancets
until 180 days after the effective date of
the final order may not be enough time
for all manufacturers of single patient
use blood lancets to implement the
required special controls and receive
510(k) clearance for those devices
without prior 510(k) clearance. The
typical review time for a 510(k) is 90
days. However, if a 510(k) submission
lacks the information necessary for the
Agency to continue or complete review,
FDA may issue a request for additional
information to the submitter and place
the 510(k) on hold pending receipt of a
complete response to the identified
deficiencies. FDA’s current policy is to
allow a sponsor 180 days to respond to
a request for additional information,1
resulting in a maximum review time of
270 days. Therefore, even if a
submission were made on the effective
date, there could be instances where a
510(k) submission would remain
pending beyond 180 days after the
effective date of the final order. FDA,
therefore, does not intend to enforce
compliance with the 510(k) requirement
or special controls until 1 year after the
effective date of this final order for
blood lancets for single patient use only
that have been offered for sale prior to
the publication of this final order but do
not already have a 510(k) clearance.
(Comment 7) There were several
comments relating to the Unique Device
Identification labeling and data
submission requirements. These
requirements apply to all devices in
commercial distribution as of their
established Unique Device
1 See page 6 of Guidance for Industry and Food
and Drug Administration Staff entitled ‘‘FDA and
Industry Actions on Premarket Notification (510(k))
Submissions: Effect on FDA Review Clock and
Goals’’, available at https://www.fda.gov/media/
73507/download.
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
66184
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Identification compliance date unless an
exception or alternative applies. For
those blood lancets that have been
offered for sale prior to November 22,
2021, the comments: (1) Expressed
concerns that the Unique Device
Identification compliance date for class
II and class III devices will have already
passed when this order is published,
and insufficient time will be provided to
allow for compliance; (2) requested that
a period of 2 or 3 years be provided for
compliance with Unique Device
Identification requirements; and (3)
pointed out that industry anticipated
that their class I devices would use the
product’s Universal Product Code (UPC)
for purposes of unique device identifier
(UDI) implementation as permitted
under § 801.40(d) (21 CFR 801.40(d)),
and that FDA has not provided a
reasonable basis to remove these devices
from this provision. These comments
further requested that FDA grant a
general exception or alternative to allow
the devices subject to this order,
regardless of their classification, to
utilize their UPCs as their UDIs.
(Response 7) There are three principal
elements to Unique Device
Identification requirements: Labeling
with a UDI, direct marking of devices
that are intended to be used more than
once and intended to be reprocessed
between uses, and data submission to
the Global Unique Device Identification
Database (GUDID) (see § 801.20, 801.45,
and 830.300 (21 CFR 801.20, 801.45,
and 830.300)). In addition, the Unique
Device Identification final rule (78 FR
58786, September 24, 2013) (UDI Rule)
added § 801.18 (21 CFR 801.18), which
requires certain dates on device labels to
be in a standard format. As explained in
the preamble to the UDI Rule, FDA
aligned the compliance date for
standard date format requirements
under § 801.18 with the compliance
date by which a device must bear a UDI
on its label and packages under § 801.20
to avoid the need to make changes to a
device label more than once to
implement the requirements in the final
rule.2 FDA disagrees 2 or 3 years is
necessary for compliance with Unique
Device Identification labeling and data
submission requirements. Rather, FDA
considered the commenters’ request for
additional time for compliance with
UDI requirements and believes that the
compliance timeframes set forth in
section VI of this order provide
sufficient time for manufacturers to
perform all the functions required to
comply with UDI labeling and data
submission requirements, including
converting manufacturing processes and
2 See
78 FR 58786 at 58795, September 24, 2013.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
associated inventory management, and
submitting required information to
GUDID. In addition, manufacturers
should consult existing UDI compliance
policies, which may be applicable to
their reclassified devices. FDA’s
publicly available UDI web page 3
contains a comprehensive listing of UDI
guidance documents and compliance
policies.
FDA also disagrees that manufacturers
of blood lancets should be permitted to
utilize their UPCs as their UDIs. As
indicated in the preamble to the UDI
Rule (78 FR 58786 at 58798) the
exception in § 801.40(d) was purposely
limited to class I devices due to their
relative low risk. For the reasons stated
in the preamble to this order, FDA no
longer considers the blood lancet
devices to be low risk and is
reclassifying them into class II and class
III. Therefore, the exception in
§ 801.40(d) will no longer apply to these
devices, and FDA does not believe that
a general exception or alternative to the
UDI labeling requirements would not be
appropriate. An individual labeler that
believes a UPC rather than a UDI on its
device label would provide for more
accurate, precise, or rapid device
identification or would better ensure the
safety or effectiveness of the device,
may submit a request for an alternative
under 21 CFR 801.55.
(Comment 8) Several comments stated
that the proposed special controls are
unclear and unnecessary for blood
lancets for single patient use blood
lancets. Other comments specifically
requested clarification of the following
special controls: (1) Design
characteristics related to single use only
blood lancets without an integral sharp
injury prevention, (2) possible
recognized consensus standards for
mechanical performance testing, (3)
sterility testing for the lancet only, and
(4) FDA identification of recognized
consensus standards for
biocompatibility testing and
clarification on whether testing should
be completed for the finished product or
only the lancet.
(Response 8) FDA continues to
believe that special controls are
necessary for single patient use only
blood lancets. At the Panel meeting,
FDA presented an analysis of the risks
to health associated with the use of
blood lancets and new scientific data
supporting these risks. These risks to
health are summarized in tables 1 to 3
of the 513(e) Proposed Order (81 FR
11140 at 11147). After deliberation, the
Panel concluded that the risks to health
warranted reclassification of blood
3 Available
PO 00000
at: https://www.fda.gov/udi.
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
lancets from class I devices, as general
controls were deemed insufficient to
provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness. The proposed special
controls are intended to inform
manufacturers of the testing and
information FDA believes to be
necessary to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness
during the use of blood lancets,
including single patient use only blood
lancets.
FDA understands the confusion
regarding the special control for single
use only blood lancets without an
integral sharps injury prevention feature
regarding design to prevent sharp object
injuries. The special controls for single
patient use only blood lancets
established by this final order are
necessary to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness for
those devices. Each subset of blood
lancets presents similar risks to health,
but requires different special controls
due to their different design
characteristics and risk profiles. Design
characteristics for blood lancets without
an integral sharp injury prevention
feature must still address the risks of
sharp object injuries and bloodborne
pathogen transmissions (see
§ 878.4850(b)(2)(i)). Examples of how
this could be achieved include, but may
not be limited to, the inclusion of a cap
or blade cover. As described in the
513(e) Proposed Order (81 FR 11140)
and adopted in this final order, these
risks are also mitigated by mechanical
performance testing to prevent device
breakage and labeling. FDA believes that
to satisfy the mechanical testing special
control manufacturers must demonstrate
injury prevention features (as
applicable) and blade performance in
single use single patient devices (see
§ 878.4850(a)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)(ii));
however, there is currently no FDArecognized consensus standard for
mechanical tests, methods, or
acceptance criteria for this device type.
At the Panel meeting, FDA presented
an analysis of the risks to health
associated with the use of blood lancets
and new scientific data supporting these
risks. FDA believes that reusable
components of single patient use
devices, such as reusable bases, should
be adequately cleaned and disinfected
(i.e., reprocessed) between uses in order
to prevent risk of infection. Sterility
testing is applicable to any device
component that breaches the skin,
thereby contacting the underlying sterile
tissue and/or blood in order to mitigate
the risk of infection. While this
requirement commonly applies to the
blade of the blood lancet device, it may
be possible for other components of a
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
blood lancet besides a ‘‘blade’’ to breach
the skin. Therefore, FDA has
determined that the sterility special
control should be revised to clearly state
that this special control applies to ‘‘any
device component that breaches the
skin (e.g., the blade)’’ for the three single
patient use subtypes of blood lancets.
The special control for biocompatibility
testing must be conducted on the final
finished form for the finished blood
lancet device and is important to
address the risk of adverse tissue
reaction (not infection).
Manufacturers are encouraged to
review the relevant FDA guidance
documents including, but not limited to
the ‘‘Submission and Review of Sterility
Information in Premarket Notification
(510(k)) Submissions for Devices
Labeled as Sterile’’ (Ref. 7) and ‘‘Use of
International Standard ISO 10993–1,
Biological Evaluation of Medical
Devices-Part 1: Evaluation and Testing
Within a Risk Management Process’’
(Ref. 8) for recommendations on how to
comply with the special control testing
requirements.
Evidence of compliance with the
special controls is required to
demonstrate reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness and to support
510(k) clearance. As stated above, FDA
does not intend to enforce compliance
with the premarket notification (510(k))
requirement and special controls for
blood lancets for single patient use only
that have been offered for sale prior to
the publication of this final order but do
not already have a 510(k) clearance.
However, 1 year after the effective date
of this order, any: (1) Single use only
blood lancet with an integral sharps
injury prevention feature that does not
comply with the special controls
established in § 878.4850(a)(2), (2)
single use only blood lancet without an
integral sharps injury prevention feature
that does not comply with the special
controls established in § 878.4850(b)(2),
or (3) multiple use blood lancet for
single patient use only established in
§ 878.4850(c)(2), will be considered
adulterated and misbranded (sections
501(f)(1)(B) and 502(o) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 351(f)(1)(B) and 352(o))) until
such time as the device complies with
the special controls and any premarket
notification requirements.
(Comment 9) A comment stated that
currently marketed blood lancets should
be exempt from design controls because
the safety concerns raised by those
single patient use devices are related to
the labeling and the use of blood lancets
generally and not with the design of the
device. Instead the comment suggests a
phased-in approach for design control
compliance for currently marketed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
devices, depending on whether they
meet the requirements pursuant to
§ 807.81(a)(3) (21 CFR 807.81(a)(3)).
(Response 9) FDA disagrees with this
comment. The lancet blade is designed
to pierce the skin and draw blood and
can present a puncture hazard to anyone
coming into contact with the device
when the blade is accessible. This
hazard is associated with serious risks
as described in the 513(e) Proposed
Order (81 FR 11140). Without the
application of design controls (21 CFR
820.30), FDA is unable to verify that
appropriate controls are in place to
ensure that blood lancet devices are
designed and tested in such a way as to
perform as intended under the labeled
conditions of use, and to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. Therefore, FDA does not
intend to allow a phased-in approach
for design control compliance of
currently marketed single patient use
blood lancets.
(Comment 10) A comment stated that
the single patient use only blood lancet
devices should be exempt from
premarket notification under section
510(m) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(m)) and suggested that special
controls could be documented in the
Design History File (DHF) for FDA’s
review during routine audits/
inspections.
(Response 10) FDA does not agree that
it is appropriate to exempt single patient
use only blood lancets from premarket
notification at this time. Section 510(m)
of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may
exempt a class II device from the
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act if
FDA determines that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. There are a
number of factors FDA may consider to
determine whether a 510(k) is necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of a class II
device. These factors are discussed in
the guidance that the Agency issued on
February 19, 1998, entitled ‘‘Procedures
for Class II Device Exemptions from
Premarket Notification, Guidance for
Industry and CDRH Staff’’ (Class II
510(k) Exemption Guidance) (Ref. 9).
Based on the scientific information
available to the Agency at this time and
summarized in the 513(e) Proposed
Order, FDA has determined these
factors currently are not met for single
patient use only blood lancet devices
and that premarket notification is
necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness for
all three types of single patient use
blood lancets.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66185
FDA also does not agree with the
comment that the Agency should only
review the DHF for a single patient use
only blood lancet device to determine
whether there exists a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness for
the device. Under 21 CFR 820.3 a DHF
is a compilation of records that
describes the design history of a
finished device based on the quality
system regulations. Although a
manufacturer of a legally marketed
device is required to keep a DHF for the
device’s design control requirements,
FDA usually does not review the DHF
until postmarket surveillance
inspections of a class II device. For
single patient use only blood lancet
devices, based on the scientific evidence
available to the Agency, FDA believes in
order for the Agency to determine
whether there exists a reasonable
assurance of safety and effective for a
device, it is necessary for compliance
with the special controls to be assessed
prior to the device entering the market.
(Comment 11) A comment
recommended that FDA create a
separate regulatory classification
category for ‘‘flat, stainless steel’’ blood
lancets in class I.
(Response 11) FDA disagrees that a
separate regulatory classification is
needed for flat, stainless steel blood
lancets in class I. FDA believes that the
four subsets of lancets identified in this
final order encompass flat, stainless
steel blood lancets; that is, a flat,
stainless steel blood lancet can be
appropriately categorized in any of
these four subsets based on its intended
use (e.g., single vs. multiple use) and
design characteristics (e.g., presence or
lack of a sharps injury prevention
feature). Furthermore, at this time, FDA
finds that the same risks to health (e.g.,
bloodborne pathogen transmission, local
tissue infections, adverse tissue
reactions) described herein for blood
lancets apply to flat, stainless steel
blood lancets. Therefore, FDA finds that
a separate categorization for flat
stainless steel blood lancets in class I is
neither necessary nor appropriate at this
time.
(Comment 12) One comment
suggested FDA allow a bundling of
several devices with the same intended
use for a 510(k) submission.
(Response 12) Bundling refers to the
inclusion of multiple devices or
multiple indications for use for a device
in a single premarket submission,
including products subject to the device
and biologics license application (BLA)
authorities, for purposes of review and
user fee payment. Multiple devices may
include different models within a
generic type of device (21 CFR 860.3) or
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
66186
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
devices that are of differing generic
types. Under the current review process
for the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health (CDRH), bundling
of multiple devices or indications for
use are acceptable for 510(k) submission
when the devices present scientific and
regulatory issues that can most
efficiently be addressed during the
course of one premarket review (Ref.
10). CDRH will make a determination of
acceptable bundling of devices on a
case-by-case basis.
(Comment 13) Some comments stated
that all multiple use lancets should be
class III.
(Response 13) FDA disagrees with this
comment. FDA believes the regulatory
requirements for blood lancets should
be based upon the indications for use of
the device and the risk of the device
when used as intended. After reviewing
the new scientific data supporting the
identified risks to health, the Panel
recommended that reclassifying subset
3, multiple use for single patient use
blood lancets from class I (general
controls) to class II (special controls)
because multiple use blood lancet
devices for single use patients do not
present a potential unreasonable risk of
illness or injury due to the inherent and
significantly increased risk of
bloodborne pathogen transmission as
compared to multiple patient blood
lancets (Ref. 2). As stated above in
response to Comment 2 in this section
and in the 513(e) Proposed Order (81 FR
11140 at 11148), FDA believes sufficient
information exists to establish special
controls for mitigating the risks to
health for subset 3 (multiple use for
single patient use only blood lancets) to
provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness of the device. Because
multiple use blood lancets for multiple
patient use present a potential
unreasonable risk of illness or injury
and insufficient information exists to
establish special controls for multiple
use blood lancets for multiple patient
use, FDA reclassified the device into
class III.
(Comment 14) Some comments stated
that the wording of the subtypes in the
513(e) Proposed Order were unclear and
should be revised to distinguish
between lancets and lancing medical
devices.
(Response 14) FDA understands the
concerns of the commenter and is
providing in this final order language to
explain whether blades are attached to
the base in each of the four subsets of
blood lancets. The base and blade
combine to create the complete lancet.
For subset 1 and 2 lancets, the blade is
attached to the base with the entire unit
being single use. In subset 3 and 4
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
lancets, single use blades are attached to
a multiuse base where the blade is
discarded after each use, but each subset
has a different labeling requirement. By
definition, subsets 1 and 2 blood lancets
do not have a blade that can be used
independently of the base. Furthermore,
FDA provides clear descriptions of
special controls that apply to each
component for subsets 1, 2, and 3. As
discussed at the Panel, multiple use
lancets for multiple patients present an
unreasonable risk of illness or injury
due to the inherent and significantly
increased risk of bloodborne pathogen
transmission and are therefore
reclassified into class III. Therefore,
FDA believes that the blood lancet
definitions presented during the Panel
meeting and provided in the 513(e)
Proposed Order are complete and
adequate.
(Comment 15) Comment stated that
FDA’s increase of postmarket
surveillance of blood glucose meter
accuracy would provide greater impact
on mitigating cross-contamination
opportunities than reclassification of
blood lancets.
(Response 15) Postmarket surveillance
of blood glucose meter accuracy is
outside the scope of this regulatory
action.
IV. The Final Order
Under section 513(e) of the FD&C Act,
FDA is adopting its findings as
published in the preamble to the 513(e)
Proposed Order for these devices (81 FR
11140). FDA is issuing this final order
to reclassify single patient use only
blood lancets devices from class I
(general controls) exempt from
premarket notification into class II
(special controls) and subject to
premarket review.4 FDA is reclassifying
these devices based on the
determination that general controls are
insufficient to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness for
blood lancets and there is sufficient
information to establish special controls
to provide such assurance for single
patient use only blood lancets (subsets
1 to 3). FDA is also establishing special
controls for each type of single patient
use only blood lancet, which are set
forth in § 878.4850(a)(2)(i) through (vi)
for single use only blood lancet with an
4 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations
(1 CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
integral sharps injury prevention
feature, § 878.4850(b)(2)(i) through (vi)
for single use only blood lancet without
an integral sharps injury prevention
feature, and § 878.4850(c)(2)(i) through
(vii) for multiple use blood lancet for
single patient use only. FDA also
intends not to enforce compliance with
this final order until 1 year after its
effective date for manufacturers of blood
lancets for single patient use only that
are currently marketed for sale prior to
the publication of this final order, but
do not already have a 510(k) clearance.
FDA is also issuing this final order to
reclassify multiple use blood lancets for
multiple patient use from class I
(general controls) exempt from
premarket notification into class III
(premarket approval). FDA is
reclassifying these devices based on the
determination that general controls and
special controls together are not
sufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness for
this device. In addition, in the absence
of an established positive benefit-risk
profile, FDA has determined that the
risks to health associated with the use
of multiple patient use blood lancets
identified previously present a potential
unreasonable risk of illness or injury.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, FDA has published a final
order requiring the filing of a PMA or
notice of completion of a PDP for
multiple patient use blood lancets.
FDA has also modified the
identification in § 878.4800(a) for
manual surgical instruments for general
use to remove the blood lancet devices
from this classification regulation and
include them under a separate
classification regulation § 878.4850.
V. Premarket Notification Requirement
for Single Patient Use Only Blood
Lancets
FDA is reclassifying single patient use
only blood lancets from class I (general
controls) exempt from premarket
notification into class II (special
controls) and subject to premarket
review. Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
FDA has determined that premarket
notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness for the intended uses of all
three types of single patient use only
blood lancets. Therefore, these three
device types are not exempt from
premarket notification requirements.
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
FDA cleared several 510(k)s for blood
lancets prior to exempting the device
types from submission of a premarket
notification. These cleared blood
lancets, as well as any 510(k)-exempt
blood lancets legally offered for sale on
or before November 22, 2021, can serve
as predicates for substantial equivalence
purposes. In order for a single patient
use only blood lancet to fall within this
classification, it would have to comply
with the special controls named in this
final order. The necessary special
controls appear in the regulation
codified by this order.
VI. Implementation Strategy
For the three types of blood lancets
being reclassified from class I (general
controls) to class II (special controls),
the special controls identified in this
order are effective November 22, 2021.
For the fourth type of blood lancet being
reclassified from class I to class III, FDA
is publishing a final order to require the
filing of a PMA or notice of completion
of a PDP elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
• Blood lancets for single patient use
only that have not been offered for sale
prior to November 22, 2021, or have
been offered for sale but are required to
submit a new 510(k) under
§ 807.81(a)(3): Manufacturers are
required to obtain 510(k) clearance
before marketing their devices after
November 22, 2021. If a manufacturer
markets such a device without receiving
510(k) clearance, then FDA would
consider taking action against such a
manufacturer, under its usual
enforcement policies.
• Blood lancets for single patient use
only that have been offered for sale prior
to November 22, 2021, and do not
already have 510(k) clearance: FDA does
not intend to enforce compliance with
the 510(k) requirement or special
controls until November 22, 2022. After
that date, if a manufacturer continues to
market such a device but does not have
a 510(k) clearance or FDA determines
that the device is not substantially
equivalent or not compliant with the
special controls, then FDA would
consider taking action against such
manufacturer under its usual
enforcement policies.
For blood lancets for single patient
use that have prior 510(k) clearance,
FDA would accept a new 510(k) and
would issue a new clearance letter, as
appropriate, indicating substantial
equivalence and compliance with the
special controls. These devices could
serve as predicates for new devices.
These clearance letters would be made
publicly available in FDA’s 510(k)
database, and compliance with special
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
controls at the time of clearance would
be stated in the publicly available 510(k)
Summary posted in this database.
Because many blood lancets for single
patient use are non-prescription (‘‘overthe-counter’’) devices, FDA believes that
our public database is a transparent tool
allowing consumers to confirm that
their devices have been submitted under
a new 510(k) and demonstrated
conformance to the applicable special
controls.
The timeframes set forth in this
section also apply to compliance with
requirements for device labeling (part
801 (21 CFR part 801)), including the
UDI labeling requirements (part 801,
subpart B), as well as device tracking
requirements (21 CFR part 821), device
reporting requirements (21 CFR part
803), and GUDID data submission
requirements (21 CFR part 830).
VII. Codification of Orders
Prior to the amendments by the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (FDASIA), section 513(e)
of the FD&C Act provided for FDA to
issue regulations to reclassify devices.
Although section 513(e) as amended
requires FDA to issue final orders rather
than regulations, FDASIA also provides
for FDA to revoke previously issued
regulations by order. FDA will continue
to codify classifications and
reclassifications in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR). Changes resulting
from final orders will appear in the CFR
as changes to codified classification
determinations or as newly codified
orders. Therefore, under section
513(e)(1)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by FDASIA, in this final order,
we are revoking the requirements in 21
CFR 878.4800 related to the
classification of blood lancets as class I
devices and codifying the
reclassification of four types of blood
lancets in 21 CFR 878.4850: Single use
only blood lancets with an integral
sharps injury prevention feature, single
use only blood lancets without an
integral sharps injury prevention
feature, and multiple use blood lancets
for single patient use only into class II,
and multiple use blood lancet for
multiple patient use into class III.
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66187
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
While this final order contains no
collection of information, it does refer to
previously approved FDA collections of
information. Therefore, clearance by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521) is not required for this final order.
The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by
OMB under the PRA. The collections of
information in 21 CFR part 807, subpart
E, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814, subparts A through E, have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0231; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 820 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0073; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 830 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0720; and the collections
of information in 21 CFR parts 800, 801
and 809 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0485.
The labeling provisions in proposed
§ 878.4850(a)(2)(vi), (b)(2)(vi), and
(c)(2)(vii) are not subject to review by
OMB because they do not constitute a
‘‘collection of information’’ under the
PRA. Rather, the following labeling: (1)
‘‘For use only on a single patient.
Discard the entire device after use.’’; (2)
‘‘For use only on a single patient.
Disinfect reusable components
according to manufacturer’s instructions
between each use.’’; (3) ‘‘Used lancet
blades must be safely discarded after a
single use.’’; (4) ‘‘Warning: Not intended
for more than one use. Do not use on
more than one patient. Improper use of
blood lancets can increase the risk of
inadvertent transmission of bloodborne
pathogens, particularly in settings
where multiple patients are tested.’’;
and (5) ‘‘Warning: Do not use on more
than one patient. Improper use of blood
lancets can increase the risk of
inadvertent transmission of bloodborne
pathogens, particularly in settings
where multiple patients are tested. The
cleaning and disinfection instructions
for this device are intended only to
reduce the risk of local use site
infection; they cannot render this device
safe for use for more than one patient.’’
are a ‘‘public disclosure of information
originally supplied by the Federal
Government to the recipient for the
purpose of disclosure to the public’’ (5
CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
X. References
The following references marked with
an asterisk (*) are on display at the
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
66188
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852, 240–402–7500. and are available
for viewing by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday; they also are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. References
without asterisks are not on public
display at https://www.regulations.gov
because they have copyright restriction.
Some may be available at the website
address, if listed. References without
asterisks are available for viewing only
at the Dockets Management Staff. FDA
has verified the website addresses, as of
the date this document publishes in the
Federal Register, but websites are
subject to change over time.
1. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA
Staff, ‘‘Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose
Test Systems for Over-the-Counter Use,’’
September 2020, available at https://
www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/
search-fda-guidance-documents/selfmonitoring-blood-glucose-test-systemsover-counter-use.
2. *Executive Summary, Transcript and other
meeting material of the June 26, 2013,
meeting of the General and Plastic
Surgery Devices Panel available at
https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/
20170405193132/https:/www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeeting
Materials/MedicalDevices/
MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/
GeneralandPlasticSurgeryDevicesPanel/
ucm349426.htm.
3. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA
Staff, ‘‘Reprocessing Medical Devices in
Health Care Settings: Validation Methods
and Labeling,’’ March 17, 2015, available
at https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/search-fda-guidancedocuments/reprocessing-medicaldevices-health-care-settings-validationmethods-and-labeling.
4. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA
Staff, ‘‘Blood Glucose Monitoring Test
Systems for Prescription Point-of-Care
Use,’’ September 2020, available at
https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/search-fda-guidancedocuments/blood-glucose-monitoringtest-systems-prescription-point-care-use.
5. *The World Health Organization (WHO)
Guidelines on Drawing Blood: Best
Practices in Phlebotomy, Part II, 2,
Geneva: World Health Organization,
2010, available at https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK138665/.
6. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute
(CLSI), GP42 7th Edition, Collection of
Capillary Blood Specimens.
7. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA
Staff, ‘‘Submission and Review of
Sterility Information in Premarket
Notification (510(k)) Submissions for
Devices Labeled as Sterile,’’ January 21,
2016, available at https://www.fda.gov/
regulatory-information/search-fdaguidance-documents/submission-and-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
review-sterility-information-premarketnotification-510k-submissions-deviceslabeled.
8. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA
Staff, ‘‘Use of International Standard ISO
10993–1, Biological Evaluation of
Medical Devices—Part 1: Evaluation and
Testing Within a Risk Management
Process,’’ September 2020, available at
https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/search-fda-guidancedocuments/use-international-standardiso-10993-1-biological-evaluationmedical-devices-part-1-evaluation-and.
9. *‘‘Procedures for Class II Device
Exemptions from Premarket
Notification,’’ Guidance for Industry and
CDRH Staff (Class II 510(k) Exemption
Guidance), February 19, 1998, available
at https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/search-fda-guidancedocuments/procedures-class-ii-deviceexemptions-premarket-notificationguidance-industry-and-cdrh-staff.
10. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA
Staff, ‘‘Bundling Multiple Devices or
Multiple Indications in a Single
Submission,’’ June 20, 2007, available at
https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/search-fda-guidancedocuments/bundling-multiple-devicesor-multiple-indications-singlesubmission.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 878 is
amended as follows:
PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC
SURGERY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 878
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Amend § 878.4800 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 878.4800 Manual surgical instrument for
general use.
(a) Identification. A manual surgical
instrument for general use is a
nonpowered, hand-held, or hand
manipulated device, either reusable or
disposable, intended to be used in
various general surgical procedures. The
device includes the applicator, clip
applier, biopsy brush, manual
dermabrasion brush, scrub brush,
cannula, ligature carrier, chisel, clamp,
contractor, curette, cutter, dissector,
elevator, skin graft expander, file,
forceps, gouge, instrument guide, needle
guide, hammer, hemostat, amputation
hook, ligature passing and knot-tying
instrument, knife, mallet, disposable or
reusable aspiration and injection needle,
disposable or reusable suturing needle,
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
osteotome, pliers, rasp, retainer,
retractor, saw, scalpel blade, scalpel
handle, one-piece scalpel, snare,
spatula, stapler, disposable or reusable
stripper, stylet, suturing apparatus for
the stomach and intestine, measuring
tape, and calipers. A surgical instrument
that has specialized uses in a specific
medical specialty is classified in
separate regulations in parts 868
through 892 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Add § 878.4850 to subpart E to read
as follows:
§ 878.4850
Blood lancets.
(a) Single use only blood lancet with
an integral sharps injury prevention
feature—(1) Identification. A disposable
blood lancet intended for a single use
that is comprised of a single use blade
attached to a solid, non-reusable base
(including an integral sharps injury
prevention feature) that is used to
puncture the skin to obtain a drop of
blood for diagnostic purposes. The
integral sharps injury prevention feature
allows the device to be used once and
then renders it inoperable and incapable
of further use.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls are:
(i) The design characteristics of the
device must ensure that the structure
and material composition are consistent
with the intended use and must include
a sharps injury prevention feature.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device will
withstand forces encountered during
use and that the integral sharps injury
prevention feature will irreversibly
disable the device after one use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated
to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate
the sterility of any device component
that breaches the skin (e.g., blade).
(v) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with
illustrations, of the proper use of the
device and its sharps injury prevention
feature.
(B) Handwashing instructions for the
user before and after use of the device.
(C) Instructions on preparation (e.g.,
cleaning, disinfection) of the skin to be
pierced.
(D) Instructions for the safe disposal
of the device.
(E) Labeling must be appropriate for
the intended use environment.
(1) For those devices intended for
health care settings, labeling must
address the health care facility use of
these devices, including how these
lancets are to be used with personal
protective equipment, such as gloves.
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 222 / Monday, November 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(2) For those devices intended for use
in the home, labeling must be written so
that it is understandable to lay users.
(vi) Labeling must also include the
following statements, prominently
placed:
(A) ‘‘For use only on a single patient.
Discard the entire device after use.’’
(B) ‘‘Warning: Not intended for more
than one use. Do not use on more than
one patient. Improper use of blood
lancets can increase the risk of
inadvertent transmission of bloodborne
pathogens, particularly in settings
where multiple patients are tested.’’
(b) Single use only blood lancet
without an integral sharps injury
prevention feature—(1) Identification. A
disposable blood lancet intended for a
single use that is comprised of a single
use blade attached to a solid, nonreusable base that is used to puncture
the skin to obtain a drop of blood for
diagnostic purposes.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls are:
(i) The design characteristics of the
device must ensure that the structure
and material composition are consistent
with the intended use and address the
risk of sharp object injuries and
bloodborne pathogen transmissions.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device will
withstand forces encountered during
use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated
to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate
the sterility of any device component
that breaches the skin (e.g., blade).
(v) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with
illustrations, of the proper use of the
device.
(B) Handwashing instructions for the
user before and after use of the device.
(C) Instructions on preparation (e.g.,
cleaning, disinfection) of the skin to be
pierced.
(D) Instructions for the safe disposal
of the device.
(E) Labeling must be appropriate for
the intended use environment.
(1) For those devices intended for
health care settings, labeling must
address the health care facility use of
these devices, including how these
lancets are to be used with personal
protective equipment, such as gloves.
(2) For those devices intended for use
in the home, labeling must be written so
that it is understandable to lay users.
(vi) Labeling must also include the
following statements, prominently
placed:
(A) ‘‘For use only on a single patient.
Discard the entire device after use.’’
(B) ‘‘Warning: Not intended for more
than one use. Do not use on more than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Nov 19, 2021
Jkt 256001
one patient. Improper use of blood
lancets can increase the risk of
inadvertent transmission of bloodborne
pathogens, particularly in settings
where multiple patients are tested.’’
(c) Multiple use blood lancet for single
patient use only—(1) Identification. A
multiple use capable blood lancet
intended for use on a single patient that
is comprised of a single use blade
attached to a solid, reusable base that is
used to puncture the skin to obtain a
drop of blood for diagnostic purposes.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls are:
(i) The design characteristics of the
device must ensure that:
(A) The lancet blade can be changed
with every use, either manually or by
triggering a blade storage unit to discard
the used blade and reload an unused
blade into the reusable base; and
(B) The structure and material
composition are consistent with the
intended use and address the risk of
sharp object injuries and bloodborne
pathogen transmissions and allow for
validated cleaning and disinfection.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device will
withstand forces encountered during
use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated
to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate
the sterility of any device component
that breaches the skin (e.g., blade).
(v) Validation testing must
demonstrate that the cleaning and
disinfection instructions are adequate to
ensure that the reusable lancet base can
be cleaned and low level disinfected.
(vi) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with
illustrations, of the proper use of the
device.
(B) The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) registered disinfectant’s
contact time for disinfectant use.
(C) Handwashing instructions for the
user before and after use of the device.
(D) Instructions on preparation (e.g.,
cleaning, disinfection) of the skin to be
pierced.
(E) Instructions on the cleaning and
disinfection of the device.
(F) Instructions for the safe disposal of
the device.
(G) Instructions for use must address
the safe storage of the reusable blood
lancet base between uses to minimize
contamination or damage and the safe
storage and disposal of the refill lancet
blades.
(H) Labeling must be appropriate for
the intended use environment.
(1) For those devices intended for
health care settings, labeling must
address the health care facility use of
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66189
these devices, including how these
lancets are to be used with personal
protective equipment, such as gloves.
(2) For those devices intended for use
in the home, labeling must be written so
that it is understandable to lay users.
(vii) Labeling must also include the
following statements, prominently
placed:
(A) ‘‘For use only on a single patient.
Disinfect reusable components
according to manufacturer’s instructions
between each use.’’
(B) ‘‘Used lancet blades must be safely
discarded after a single use.’’
(C) ‘‘Warning: Do not use on more
than one patient. Improper use of blood
lancets can increase the risk of
inadvertent transmission of bloodborne
pathogens, particularly in settings
where multiple patients are tested. The
cleaning and disinfection instructions
for this device are intended only to
reduce the risk of local use site
infection; they cannot render this device
safe for use for more than one patient.’’
(d) Multiple use blood lancet for
multiple patient use—(1) Identification.
A multiple use capable blood lancet
intended for use on multiple patients
that is comprised of a single use blade
attached to a solid, reusable base that is
used to puncture the skin to obtain a
drop of blood for diagnostic purposes.
(2) Classification. Class III (premarket
approval).
Dated: November 16, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–25376 Filed 11–19–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0077]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Biscayne
Bay Causeway Island Slip, Miami
Beach, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a Regulated Navigation
Area over certain navigable waters of
the Biscayne Bay Causeway Island Slip,
immediately west of the Coast Guard
Base Miami Beach, Miami Beach, FL.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life and federal property on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 222 (Monday, November 22, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66180-66189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25376]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0400]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices;
Reclassification of Blood Lancets
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
issuing a final order to reclassify three types of blood lancets used
to puncture skin to obtain a drop of blood for diagnostic purposes from
class I (general controls) exempt from premarket notification into
class II (special controls) and subject to premarket notification,
specifically, single use only blood lancets with an integral sharps
injury prevention feature, single use only blood lancets without an
integral sharps injury prevention feature, and multiple use blood
lancets for single patient use only. FDA is designating special
controls for these three types of blood lancets based on the
determination that general controls only are not sufficient and there
is sufficient information to establish special controls to provide a
reasonable assurance of their safety and effectiveness. FDA is also
reclassifying a fourth type of blood lancet, multiple use blood lancets
for multiple patient use, from class I (general controls) exempt from
premarket notification into class III (premarket approval). FDA is
reclassifying these four types of blood lancets on its own initiative
based on new information.
DATES: This order is effective November 22, 2021. See further
discussion in section VI, Implementation Strategy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Nipper, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1540,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-6527, [email protected]; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240-402-
7911, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Table of Abbreviations/Commonly Used Acronyms in This Document
II. Background
A. Classification
B. Reclassification
C. Requirement for Premarket Approval
III. Public Comments in Response to the Proposed Order
IV. The Final Order
V. Premarket Notification Requirement for Single Patient Use Only
Blood Lancets
VI. Implementation Strategy
VII. Codification of Orders
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
X. References
I. Table of Abbreviations/Commonly Used Acronyms in This Document
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abbreviation or acronym What it means
------------------------------------------------------------------------
510(k)............................... Premarket Notification.
515(b) Proposed Order................ Proposed Order calling for
premarket approval applications
for class III blood lancets
published on March 3, 2016 (81
FR 11151).
513(e) Proposed Order................ Proposed Order to reclassify
blood lancets published on March
3, 2016 (81 FR 11140).
Agency............................... Food and Drug Administration.
CDC.................................. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
CFR.................................. Code of Federal Regulations.
EPA.................................. Environmental Protection Agency.
FDA.................................. Food and Drug Administration.
FDASIA............................... Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act.
FD&C Act............................. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act.
FR................................... Federal Register.
HIV.................................. Human Immunodeficiency Virus.
OMB.................................. Office of Management and Budget.
Panel................................ General & Plastic Surgery Devices
Panel of the Medical Devices
Advisory Committee, device
classification panel on June 26,
2013.
PDP.................................. Product Development Protocol.
PMA.................................. Premarket Approval Application.
PRA.................................. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
PT/INR............................... Prothrombin Time and
International Normalized Ratio.
Ref.................................. Reference.
UDI.................................. Unique Device Identifier.
UPC.................................. Universal Product Code.
U.S.C................................ United States Code.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 66181]]
II. Background
A. Classification
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 301
et seq.), as amended, established a comprehensive system for the
regulation of medical devices intended for human use. Section 513 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c) established three categories (classes) of
devices, reflecting the regulatory controls needed to provide
reasonable assurance of their safety and effectiveness. The three
categories of devices are class I (general controls), class II (special
controls), and class III (premarket approval).
Under section 513(d) of the FD&C Act, devices that were in
commercial distribution before the enactment of the 1976 amendments on
May 28, 1976 (generally referred to as ``preamendments devices'') are
classified after FDA has: (1) Received a recommendation from a device
classification panel (an FDA advisory committee); (2) published the
panel's recommendation for comment, along with a proposed regulation
classifying the device; and (3) published a final regulation
classifying the device. FDA has classified most preamendments devices
under these procedures.
B. Reclassification
Section 513(e)(1) of the FD&C Act sets forth the process for
issuing a final order for reclassifying a device. Specifically, prior
to the issuance of a final order reclassifying a device, the following
must occur: (1) Publication of a proposed order in the Federal
Register; (2) a meeting of a device classification panel described in
section 513(b) of the FD&C Act; and (3) consideration of comments to a
public docket.
FDA published a proposed order in the Federal Register of March 3,
2016 (81 FR 11140), held a device classification panel meeting of the
General & Plastic Surgery Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory
Committee, on June 26, 2013 (the Panel), as described in section 513(b)
of the FD&C Act with respect to the four different types of blood
lancet devices, and considered comments from public dockets. Therefore,
FDA has met the requirements under section 513(e)(1) of the FD&C Act.
C. Requirement for Premarket Approval
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA has published
a final order requiring the filing of a premarket approval application
(PMA) or notice of completion of a product development protocol (PDP)
for multiple patient blood lancets (class III). In practice, the option
of filing a notice of completion of a PDP has rarely been used by
manufacturers. For simplicity, while corresponding requirements for
PDPs remain available to manufacturers in response to a final order
under section 515(b) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e(b)), this document
will refer only to the requirement for the filing and obtaining
approval of a PMA.
III. Public Comments in Response to the Proposed Order
In the Federal Register of March 3, 2016, FDA published a proposed
order to reclassify single patient use blood lancets from class I
(general controls) exempt from premarket notification to class II
(special controls) and to reclassify multiple patient blood lancets
from class I (general controls) exempt from premarket notification to
class III (premarket approval) (513(e) Proposed Order, 81 FR 11140)).
On that same date, FDA also published a proposed order to require the
filing of a PMA for multiple patient blood lancets (515(b) Proposed
Order) (81 FR 11151). The proposed orders also stated that FDA proposed
to amend 21 CFR part 878 to create a separate regulation under Sec.
878.4850 (21 CFR 878.4850) for all blood lancet types (previously
identified with product codes FMK or JCA). The comment periods for both
proposed orders closed on June 1, 2016.
The March 3, 2016, 513(e) Proposed Order received approximately 150
comments from industry, professional societies, trade organizations,
and individual consumers by the close of the comment period. Certain
comments have been grouped together under a single comment since the
theme of the comments are similar in nature. The grouped comments and
FDA's response to each grouping are summarized in this section. The
number assigned to each comment is purely for organizational purposes
and does not signify the comment's value, importance, or the order in
which it was received.
As previously set forth in the 513(e) Proposed Order, FDA
identified the following four subsets of blood lancet devices:
1. A single use only blood lancet with an integral sharps injury
prevention feature is a disposable blood lancet intended for a single
use that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a solid, non-
reusable base (including an integral sharps injury prevention feature)
that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of blood for
diagnostic purposes. The integral sharps injury prevention feature
allows the device to be used once and then renders it inoperable and
incapable of further use (``subset 1'');
2. A single use only blood lancet without an integral sharps injury
prevention feature is a disposable blood lancet intended for a single
use that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a solid, non-
reusable base that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of
blood for diagnostic purposes (``subset 2'');
3. A multiple use blood lancet for single patient use only is a
multiple use capable blood lancet intended for use on a single patient
that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a solid, reusable
base that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of blood for
diagnostic purposes (``subset 3''); and
4. A multiple use blood lancet for multiple patient use is a
multiple use capable blood lancet intended for use on multiple patients
that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a solid, reusable
base that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of blood for
diagnostic purposes (``subset 4'').
(Comment 1) Several comments generally agreed with the proposed
reclassification of all four types of blood lancet devices. Some
comments supported the proposed precautions and labeling special
controls as necessary for healthcare providers and users of single
patient use blood lancets. Other comments agreed that the risks to
public health associated with use of multiple use blood lancets for
multiple patients are sufficiently significant for FDA to reclassify
this device type into class III (premarket approval).
(Response 1) After considering the Panel's recommendations and
examination of scientific information (Ref. 1, and previously described
in the 513(e) Proposed Order (81 FR 11140 at 11142), FDA continues to
believe that there is sufficient evidence to establish special controls
that, together with general controls, provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness to reclassify single patient use only blood
lancets to class II, as initially specified in the 513(e) Proposed
Order. Further, FDA continues to believe that blood lancets for
multiple patient use present a potential for unreasonable risk of
illness or injury, that insufficient information exists for FDA to
determine that special controls would provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device, and that blood lancets for
multiple patient use should be reclassified into class III.
(Comment 2) Several comments stated that the evidence for a risk of
infection was associated with the use of blood lancets in a
professional care setting and therefore there was no evidence to
[[Page 66182]]
support reclassification of personal blood lancet devices in home use
environments.
(Response 2) FDA disagrees with the comments that there is no
evidence to support the reclassification of single patient use blood
lancets for home use from class I (general controls) to class II
(special controls). At the Panel meeting on June 26, 2013, FDA
presented an analysis of the risks to health associated with the use of
blood lancets and new scientific data supporting these risks (Ref. 2).
Although the information on infection transmission was generated in
healthcare settings, FDA believes the risks to health are general risks
that apply to all single use patient blood lancets, regardless of the
environment in which they are used. Based on the scientific evidence
available to the Agency at that time, blood may be transmitted between
patient and care givers by the misuse of ``single use only'' medical
devices that are not intended for or labeled for reuse, because they
are not designed to be cleaned or sterilized to become safe for reuse,
such as needles or syringes (Ref. 2). Similarly, transmission may also
occur if validated cleaning and disinfection instructions are not
identified and followed for multiple use blood lancets for single
patient use only (subset 3). After reviewing the new scientific data
supporting the identified risks to health, the Panel recommended that
reclassifying single patient use blood lancets from class I (general
controls) to class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of blood lancets for single
patient use.
The Panel also acknowledged that many of the adverse event reports
of device problems indicate that accidental sticks are most likely when
safety features malfunction, the lancet is difficult to remove, or when
lancets are too dull to pierce the skin or too long to fit within the
safety caps (Ref. 2). From January 1, 2015, to May 31, 2021, FDA
received over 3,100 reports for blood lancets, most of which are device
malfunctions. The most commonly reported problems include accidental
blade sticks, the blade breaking off or remaining in a patient's
finger, and the blade protruding from the device cap or not retracting.
In addition, FDA received numerous reports of device malfunctioning and
retraction problems with the blood lancets.
FDA agrees with the Panel that reclassification from class I to
class II is appropriate for single patient use blood lancets and is
supported by FDA's findings reported in the 513(e) Proposed Order,
adverse event reporting, and the panel executive summary (Ref. 2). FDA
also agrees with the Panel that premarket notification (510(k))
submissions are necessary for single patient use blood lancets to
ensure adequacy of the labeling concerning the limitation to single
patient use only, effective sharps injury prevention features that
disable the lancet from further use (when applicable), and blade
dispense release mechanisms on multiple use blood lancets for single
patient use only, as well as instructions for a safe blade disposal and
cleaning and disinfection for the multiple use blood lancets for single
patient use only. These special controls are consistent with the
special controls applicable to other similar device technology such as
injection needles (Ref. 2). As a result, FDA believes the premarket
notification requirement and the established special controls are
necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness
for all for single patient use blood lancets, whether they are used in
a home environment or a healthcare setting.
(Comment 3) Several comments stated that the 513(e) Proposed Order,
if finalized, would increase the cost of blood lancets for single
patient use, putting an undue burden on patients, and would cause what
one comment referred to as ``economic driven disruption . . . with
lancet access driving use of less expensive devices'' in the wrong
setting.
(Response 3) FDA appreciates the economic concerns raised by users
of blood lancets regarding the cost of this device; however,
reclassification decisions are based on the level of controls necessary
to ensure that reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness
requirements under 21 CFR 860.7(d) and (e) as well as section 513(e) of
the FD&C Act are met. The regulatory requirements for blood lancets
established by FDA are based on the probable benefits to health for the
indications for use of blood lancet devices and the risk of the devices
when used as intended, and not the costs of the device. FDA also agrees
with the findings of the Panel and believes that to mitigate the known
risks to health posed by these devices, the proposed special controls
are necessary for single patient use only blood lancets, regardless of
their environment of use. In addition, FDA believes that manufacturers
of single patient use only blood lancets may already be complying with
some of the proposed special controls (e.g., biocompatibility testing
and package integrity testing) because they are industry standard type
tests (Ref. 2). Therefore, FDA does not believe the reclassification of
single patient use only blood lancets (subsets 1, 2, or 3) will result
in an economic disruption that will affect the availability of or
patient access to these devices for these intended purposes.
(Comment 4) Several comments stated that the proposed special
controls related to the disinfection of skin and/or reusable device
components for single patient use blood lancets (subsets 1, 2, or 3),
along with the associated special controls concerning labeling and
validation, were either too burdensome or not appropriate. For example,
one comment did not understand why disinfection was needed for a single
patient home use device; a similar comment felt that cleaning and
disinfection validation was overly burdensome for single patient home
use devices. A few comments stated that disinfection of the skin would
adversely affect blood glucose monitoring by resulting in
vasoconstriction. Also, one comment suggested that FDA should not
mandate usage of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) commercially
registered disinfectant if a commonly available generic disinfectant
agent is equally effective for home use.
(Response 4) FDA believes that the special controls related to the
disinfection of reusable device components, along with the associated
special controls pertaining to labeling and validation, are appropriate
to ensure a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness for
multiple use blood lancets for single patient use (i.e., subset 3). To
reduce the risk of infection, FDA believes that reusable components of
single patient use lancets, such as reusable bases, should be
adequately cleaned and disinfected (i.e., reprocessed) between uses.
Without adequate reprocessing validation conducted initially by the
manufacturer for multiple use blood lancets for single patient use
under simulated use conditions, it is unclear whether adequate labeling
for cleaning and disinfection between uses by the end user can be
developed. Further, patient soil (e.g., skin cells, oil, dirt, skin
flora, and body fluids such as blood and sweat) can accumulate on the
reusable component over time, creating an ideal environment for
microbial growth. Although the lancet may be for single patient use,
soil can become transferred from the reusable base component to the
single-use lancet, thereby posing a risk of infection upon reuse of the
device in the same patient.
At the Panel meeting, FDA presented an analysis of the risks to
health associated with the use of blood lancets and new scientific data
supporting these
[[Page 66183]]
risks. Beyond mitigating the risk of infection, the Panel felt that
reprocessing validation was necessary to demonstrate the functionality
of the device over its lifetime, since the device could degrade when
subjected to multiple cleaning and disinfection cycles (Ref. 2). FDA's
guidance entitled ``Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care
Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling'' provides recommendations
for validation methods and labeling for proper cleaning of reusable
medical devices that are consistent with the special controls in this
final order (Ref. 3). Furthermore, the special controls for proper
cleaning and disinfection of reusable components in this final order
are also consistent with the recommendations in FDA's guidances ``Self-
Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Systems for Over-the-Counter Use'' and
``Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Prescription Point-of-Care
Use,'' which concern devices that are used by some of the same patient
populations as those using blood lancets, both in a home use and
clinical environment (Refs. 1 and 4).
FDA continues to believe that use of EPA-registered disinfectants
is necessary for cleaning and disinfection of the multiple use blood
lancets for single patient use even for home use settings. FDA
recommends utilizing disinfectants that are effective against
bloodborne pathogens, such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV),
Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C viruses. FDA also recommends the use of
EPA-registered disinfectants because they have been demonstrated to be
effective against specific bloodborne pathogens when used for specified
contact times. EPA-registered disinfectants, which include both
commercially registered disinfectants and commonly available generic
disinfectant agents, are not allowed to make efficacy claims against
specific pathogens unless the EPA has reviewed data to support those
claims.
FDA notes that preparation of skin is part of standard patient care
prior to drawing blood from patients, and that current guidelines and
standards (Refs. 5 and 6) generally include cleaning and disinfection
of skin prior to capillary blood sampling. The purpose of this skin
preparation step is to prevent infections caused by entry of microbial
flora on the patient's skin into the puncture wound created by the
blood lancet. Nonetheless, FDA recognizes that the skin preparation
procedure may differ depending on the particular application and/or
clinical use, and that specific guidelines may exist for skin
preparation for certain clinical applications. As such, FDA has revised
the special control regarding ``instructions on cleaning and
disinfection of the skin to be pierced'' to instead state
``instructions on preparation (e.g., cleaning, disinfection) of the
skin to be pierced.''
As a result of the available scientific information, FDA has
determined that labeling special controls are necessary to address
safety risks associated with use as labeled, and possible misuse, of
blood lancets. In particular, it is critical to have specific required
labeling special controls related to the preparation of skin and
reprocessing of blood lancets for single patient use devices to provide
a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
(Comment 5) Several comments stated that the proposed labeling for
single patient use only blood lancet devices is inadequate, overly
prescriptive, and/or unnecessary for blood lancets used in home use
environments.
(Response 5) FDA continues to believe that the labeling proposed as
special controls for single patient use only blood lancets (subsets 1,
2, and 3) are necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness for these devices and believes the current labeling for
blood lancets is inadequate. At the Panel meeting, FDA presented an
analysis of the risks to health associated with the use of blood
lancets and new scientific data supporting these risks. In the data
that was presented, it was shown that the risk of bloodborne pathogen
transmission was related to the improper use of blood lancets. FDA
believes that additional labeling is needed to address this safety risk
associated with misuse of blood lancets, including detailed
descriptions of the proper use of the device and any sharps injury
prevention feature, hand washing instructions for the user before and
after use of the device, instructions on cleaning and disinfection of
the device and to the skin to be pierced, and instructions for the safe
disposal of the device (Ref. 2). For each environment of use for blood
lancets, adequate labeling must be included to address either use of
these devices in healthcare settings or labeling for home use that is
written for the end users to be able to understand and follow the
instructions.
FDA has determined that general controls alone are not sufficient
to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effective for these
devices (subsets 1, 2, and 3), and there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide such an assurance; therefore, FDA
is reclassifying these devices into class II (81 FR 11140 at 11142).
The Panel consensus was that single patient use only blood lancets meet
the statutory definition of a class II device and require labeling
special controls related to the cleaning and disinfection of skin and
blood lancets for single patient use devices to reasonably assure
safety and effectiveness.
(Comment 6) Some comments stated that the proposed 180-day
timeframe is too short for manufacturers of single patient use blood
lancets (subsets 1 to 3) to demonstrate conformance with the required
special controls and submit a premarket notification (510(k)). The
comments recommended timeframes ranging from 1 to 2 years for the
submission of new 510(k)s for these types of blood lancets.
(Response 6) FDA agrees with the commenters' concern that its
proposal to not enforce compliance with the 510(k) requirement or
special controls for single patient use only blood lancets until 180
days after the effective date of the final order may not be enough time
for all manufacturers of single patient use blood lancets to implement
the required special controls and receive 510(k) clearance for those
devices without prior 510(k) clearance. The typical review time for a
510(k) is 90 days. However, if a 510(k) submission lacks the
information necessary for the Agency to continue or complete review,
FDA may issue a request for additional information to the submitter and
place the 510(k) on hold pending receipt of a complete response to the
identified deficiencies. FDA's current policy is to allow a sponsor 180
days to respond to a request for additional information,\1\ resulting
in a maximum review time of 270 days. Therefore, even if a submission
were made on the effective date, there could be instances where a
510(k) submission would remain pending beyond 180 days after the
effective date of the final order. FDA, therefore, does not intend to
enforce compliance with the 510(k) requirement or special controls
until 1 year after the effective date of this final order for blood
lancets for single patient use only that have been offered for sale
prior to the publication of this final order but do not already have a
510(k) clearance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See page 6 of Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug
Administration Staff entitled ``FDA and Industry Actions on
Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions: Effect on FDA Review
Clock and Goals'', available at https://www.fda.gov/media/73507/download.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Comment 7) There were several comments relating to the Unique
Device Identification labeling and data submission requirements. These
requirements apply to all devices in commercial distribution as of
their established Unique Device
[[Page 66184]]
Identification compliance date unless an exception or alternative
applies. For those blood lancets that have been offered for sale prior
to November 22, 2021, the comments: (1) Expressed concerns that the
Unique Device Identification compliance date for class II and class III
devices will have already passed when this order is published, and
insufficient time will be provided to allow for compliance; (2)
requested that a period of 2 or 3 years be provided for compliance with
Unique Device Identification requirements; and (3) pointed out that
industry anticipated that their class I devices would use the product's
Universal Product Code (UPC) for purposes of unique device identifier
(UDI) implementation as permitted under Sec. 801.40(d) (21 CFR
801.40(d)), and that FDA has not provided a reasonable basis to remove
these devices from this provision. These comments further requested
that FDA grant a general exception or alternative to allow the devices
subject to this order, regardless of their classification, to utilize
their UPCs as their UDIs.
(Response 7) There are three principal elements to Unique Device
Identification requirements: Labeling with a UDI, direct marking of
devices that are intended to be used more than once and intended to be
reprocessed between uses, and data submission to the Global Unique
Device Identification Database (GUDID) (see Sec. 801.20, 801.45, and
830.300 (21 CFR 801.20, 801.45, and 830.300)). In addition, the Unique
Device Identification final rule (78 FR 58786, September 24, 2013) (UDI
Rule) added Sec. 801.18 (21 CFR 801.18), which requires certain dates
on device labels to be in a standard format. As explained in the
preamble to the UDI Rule, FDA aligned the compliance date for standard
date format requirements under Sec. 801.18 with the compliance date by
which a device must bear a UDI on its label and packages under Sec.
801.20 to avoid the need to make changes to a device label more than
once to implement the requirements in the final rule.\2\ FDA disagrees
2 or 3 years is necessary for compliance with Unique Device
Identification labeling and data submission requirements. Rather, FDA
considered the commenters' request for additional time for compliance
with UDI requirements and believes that the compliance timeframes set
forth in section VI of this order provide sufficient time for
manufacturers to perform all the functions required to comply with UDI
labeling and data submission requirements, including converting
manufacturing processes and associated inventory management, and
submitting required information to GUDID. In addition, manufacturers
should consult existing UDI compliance policies, which may be
applicable to their reclassified devices. FDA's publicly available UDI
web page \3\ contains a comprehensive listing of UDI guidance documents
and compliance policies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 78 FR 58786 at 58795, September 24, 2013.
\3\ Available at: https://www.fda.gov/udi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA also disagrees that manufacturers of blood lancets should be
permitted to utilize their UPCs as their UDIs. As indicated in the
preamble to the UDI Rule (78 FR 58786 at 58798) the exception in Sec.
801.40(d) was purposely limited to class I devices due to their
relative low risk. For the reasons stated in the preamble to this
order, FDA no longer considers the blood lancet devices to be low risk
and is reclassifying them into class II and class III. Therefore, the
exception in Sec. 801.40(d) will no longer apply to these devices, and
FDA does not believe that a general exception or alternative to the UDI
labeling requirements would not be appropriate. An individual labeler
that believes a UPC rather than a UDI on its device label would provide
for more accurate, precise, or rapid device identification or would
better ensure the safety or effectiveness of the device, may submit a
request for an alternative under 21 CFR 801.55.
(Comment 8) Several comments stated that the proposed special
controls are unclear and unnecessary for blood lancets for single
patient use blood lancets. Other comments specifically requested
clarification of the following special controls: (1) Design
characteristics related to single use only blood lancets without an
integral sharp injury prevention, (2) possible recognized consensus
standards for mechanical performance testing, (3) sterility testing for
the lancet only, and (4) FDA identification of recognized consensus
standards for biocompatibility testing and clarification on whether
testing should be completed for the finished product or only the
lancet.
(Response 8) FDA continues to believe that special controls are
necessary for single patient use only blood lancets. At the Panel
meeting, FDA presented an analysis of the risks to health associated
with the use of blood lancets and new scientific data supporting these
risks. These risks to health are summarized in tables 1 to 3 of the
513(e) Proposed Order (81 FR 11140 at 11147). After deliberation, the
Panel concluded that the risks to health warranted reclassification of
blood lancets from class I devices, as general controls were deemed
insufficient to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. The proposed special controls are intended to inform
manufacturers of the testing and information FDA believes to be
necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness
during the use of blood lancets, including single patient use only
blood lancets.
FDA understands the confusion regarding the special control for
single use only blood lancets without an integral sharps injury
prevention feature regarding design to prevent sharp object injuries.
The special controls for single patient use only blood lancets
established by this final order are necessary to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness for those devices. Each subset of
blood lancets presents similar risks to health, but requires different
special controls due to their different design characteristics and risk
profiles. Design characteristics for blood lancets without an integral
sharp injury prevention feature must still address the risks of sharp
object injuries and bloodborne pathogen transmissions (see Sec.
878.4850(b)(2)(i)). Examples of how this could be achieved include, but
may not be limited to, the inclusion of a cap or blade cover. As
described in the 513(e) Proposed Order (81 FR 11140) and adopted in
this final order, these risks are also mitigated by mechanical
performance testing to prevent device breakage and labeling. FDA
believes that to satisfy the mechanical testing special control
manufacturers must demonstrate injury prevention features (as
applicable) and blade performance in single use single patient devices
(see Sec. 878.4850(a)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)(ii)); however, there is
currently no FDA-recognized consensus standard for mechanical tests,
methods, or acceptance criteria for this device type.
At the Panel meeting, FDA presented an analysis of the risks to
health associated with the use of blood lancets and new scientific data
supporting these risks. FDA believes that reusable components of single
patient use devices, such as reusable bases, should be adequately
cleaned and disinfected (i.e., reprocessed) between uses in order to
prevent risk of infection. Sterility testing is applicable to any
device component that breaches the skin, thereby contacting the
underlying sterile tissue and/or blood in order to mitigate the risk of
infection. While this requirement commonly applies to the blade of the
blood lancet device, it may be possible for other components of a
[[Page 66185]]
blood lancet besides a ``blade'' to breach the skin. Therefore, FDA has
determined that the sterility special control should be revised to
clearly state that this special control applies to ``any device
component that breaches the skin (e.g., the blade)'' for the three
single patient use subtypes of blood lancets. The special control for
biocompatibility testing must be conducted on the final finished form
for the finished blood lancet device and is important to address the
risk of adverse tissue reaction (not infection).
Manufacturers are encouraged to review the relevant FDA guidance
documents including, but not limited to the ``Submission and Review of
Sterility Information in Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions
for Devices Labeled as Sterile'' (Ref. 7) and ``Use of International
Standard ISO 10993-1, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 1:
Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process'' (Ref. 8) for
recommendations on how to comply with the special control testing
requirements.
Evidence of compliance with the special controls is required to
demonstrate reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness and to
support 510(k) clearance. As stated above, FDA does not intend to
enforce compliance with the premarket notification (510(k)) requirement
and special controls for blood lancets for single patient use only that
have been offered for sale prior to the publication of this final order
but do not already have a 510(k) clearance. However, 1 year after the
effective date of this order, any: (1) Single use only blood lancet
with an integral sharps injury prevention feature that does not comply
with the special controls established in Sec. 878.4850(a)(2), (2)
single use only blood lancet without an integral sharps injury
prevention feature that does not comply with the special controls
established in Sec. 878.4850(b)(2), or (3) multiple use blood lancet
for single patient use only established in Sec. 878.4850(c)(2), will
be considered adulterated and misbranded (sections 501(f)(1)(B) and
502(o) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 351(f)(1)(B) and 352(o))) until such
time as the device complies with the special controls and any premarket
notification requirements.
(Comment 9) A comment stated that currently marketed blood lancets
should be exempt from design controls because the safety concerns
raised by those single patient use devices are related to the labeling
and the use of blood lancets generally and not with the design of the
device. Instead the comment suggests a phased-in approach for design
control compliance for currently marketed devices, depending on whether
they meet the requirements pursuant to Sec. 807.81(a)(3) (21 CFR
807.81(a)(3)).
(Response 9) FDA disagrees with this comment. The lancet blade is
designed to pierce the skin and draw blood and can present a puncture
hazard to anyone coming into contact with the device when the blade is
accessible. This hazard is associated with serious risks as described
in the 513(e) Proposed Order (81 FR 11140). Without the application of
design controls (21 CFR 820.30), FDA is unable to verify that
appropriate controls are in place to ensure that blood lancet devices
are designed and tested in such a way as to perform as intended under
the labeled conditions of use, and to provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness. Therefore, FDA does not intend to allow a
phased-in approach for design control compliance of currently marketed
single patient use blood lancets.
(Comment 10) A comment stated that the single patient use only
blood lancet devices should be exempt from premarket notification under
section 510(m) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(m)) and suggested that
special controls could be documented in the Design History File (DHF)
for FDA's review during routine audits/inspections.
(Response 10) FDA does not agree that it is appropriate to exempt
single patient use only blood lancets from premarket notification at
this time. Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt
a class II device from the premarket notification requirements under
section 510(k) of the FD&C Act if FDA determines that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device. There are a number of factors
FDA may consider to determine whether a 510(k) is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of a class II
device. These factors are discussed in the guidance that the Agency
issued on February 19, 1998, entitled ``Procedures for Class II Device
Exemptions from Premarket Notification, Guidance for Industry and CDRH
Staff'' (Class II 510(k) Exemption Guidance) (Ref. 9). Based on the
scientific information available to the Agency at this time and
summarized in the 513(e) Proposed Order, FDA has determined these
factors currently are not met for single patient use only blood lancet
devices and that premarket notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness for all three types of
single patient use blood lancets.
FDA also does not agree with the comment that the Agency should
only review the DHF for a single patient use only blood lancet device
to determine whether there exists a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness for the device. Under 21 CFR 820.3 a DHF is a compilation
of records that describes the design history of a finished device based
on the quality system regulations. Although a manufacturer of a legally
marketed device is required to keep a DHF for the device's design
control requirements, FDA usually does not review the DHF until
postmarket surveillance inspections of a class II device. For single
patient use only blood lancet devices, based on the scientific evidence
available to the Agency, FDA believes in order for the Agency to
determine whether there exists a reasonable assurance of safety and
effective for a device, it is necessary for compliance with the special
controls to be assessed prior to the device entering the market.
(Comment 11) A comment recommended that FDA create a separate
regulatory classification category for ``flat, stainless steel'' blood
lancets in class I.
(Response 11) FDA disagrees that a separate regulatory
classification is needed for flat, stainless steel blood lancets in
class I. FDA believes that the four subsets of lancets identified in
this final order encompass flat, stainless steel blood lancets; that
is, a flat, stainless steel blood lancet can be appropriately
categorized in any of these four subsets based on its intended use
(e.g., single vs. multiple use) and design characteristics (e.g.,
presence or lack of a sharps injury prevention feature). Furthermore,
at this time, FDA finds that the same risks to health (e.g., bloodborne
pathogen transmission, local tissue infections, adverse tissue
reactions) described herein for blood lancets apply to flat, stainless
steel blood lancets. Therefore, FDA finds that a separate
categorization for flat stainless steel blood lancets in class I is
neither necessary nor appropriate at this time.
(Comment 12) One comment suggested FDA allow a bundling of several
devices with the same intended use for a 510(k) submission.
(Response 12) Bundling refers to the inclusion of multiple devices
or multiple indications for use for a device in a single premarket
submission, including products subject to the device and biologics
license application (BLA) authorities, for purposes of review and user
fee payment. Multiple devices may include different models within a
generic type of device (21 CFR 860.3) or
[[Page 66186]]
devices that are of differing generic types. Under the current review
process for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH),
bundling of multiple devices or indications for use are acceptable for
510(k) submission when the devices present scientific and regulatory
issues that can most efficiently be addressed during the course of one
premarket review (Ref. 10). CDRH will make a determination of
acceptable bundling of devices on a case-by-case basis.
(Comment 13) Some comments stated that all multiple use lancets
should be class III.
(Response 13) FDA disagrees with this comment. FDA believes the
regulatory requirements for blood lancets should be based upon the
indications for use of the device and the risk of the device when used
as intended. After reviewing the new scientific data supporting the
identified risks to health, the Panel recommended that reclassifying
subset 3, multiple use for single patient use blood lancets from class
I (general controls) to class II (special controls) because multiple
use blood lancet devices for single use patients do not present a
potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury due to the inherent
and significantly increased risk of bloodborne pathogen transmission as
compared to multiple patient blood lancets (Ref. 2). As stated above in
response to Comment 2 in this section and in the 513(e) Proposed Order
(81 FR 11140 at 11148), FDA believes sufficient information exists to
establish special controls for mitigating the risks to health for
subset 3 (multiple use for single patient use only blood lancets) to
provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the
device. Because multiple use blood lancets for multiple patient use
present a potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury and
insufficient information exists to establish special controls for
multiple use blood lancets for multiple patient use, FDA reclassified
the device into class III.
(Comment 14) Some comments stated that the wording of the subtypes
in the 513(e) Proposed Order were unclear and should be revised to
distinguish between lancets and lancing medical devices.
(Response 14) FDA understands the concerns of the commenter and is
providing in this final order language to explain whether blades are
attached to the base in each of the four subsets of blood lancets. The
base and blade combine to create the complete lancet. For subset 1 and
2 lancets, the blade is attached to the base with the entire unit being
single use. In subset 3 and 4 lancets, single use blades are attached
to a multiuse base where the blade is discarded after each use, but
each subset has a different labeling requirement. By definition,
subsets 1 and 2 blood lancets do not have a blade that can be used
independently of the base. Furthermore, FDA provides clear descriptions
of special controls that apply to each component for subsets 1, 2, and
3. As discussed at the Panel, multiple use lancets for multiple
patients present an unreasonable risk of illness or injury due to the
inherent and significantly increased risk of bloodborne pathogen
transmission and are therefore reclassified into class III. Therefore,
FDA believes that the blood lancet definitions presented during the
Panel meeting and provided in the 513(e) Proposed Order are complete
and adequate.
(Comment 15) Comment stated that FDA's increase of postmarket
surveillance of blood glucose meter accuracy would provide greater
impact on mitigating cross-contamination opportunities than
reclassification of blood lancets.
(Response 15) Postmarket surveillance of blood glucose meter
accuracy is outside the scope of this regulatory action.
IV. The Final Order
Under section 513(e) of the FD&C Act, FDA is adopting its findings
as published in the preamble to the 513(e) Proposed Order for these
devices (81 FR 11140). FDA is issuing this final order to reclassify
single patient use only blood lancets devices from class I (general
controls) exempt from premarket notification into class II (special
controls) and subject to premarket review.\4\ FDA is reclassifying
these devices based on the determination that general controls are
insufficient to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness for blood lancets and there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide such assurance for single patient
use only blood lancets (subsets 1 to 3). FDA is also establishing
special controls for each type of single patient use only blood lancet,
which are set forth in Sec. 878.4850(a)(2)(i) through (vi) for single
use only blood lancet with an integral sharps injury prevention
feature, Sec. 878.4850(b)(2)(i) through (vi) for single use only blood
lancet without an integral sharps injury prevention feature, and Sec.
878.4850(c)(2)(i) through (vii) for multiple use blood lancet for
single patient use only. FDA also intends not to enforce compliance
with this final order until 1 year after its effective date for
manufacturers of blood lancets for single patient use only that are
currently marketed for sale prior to the publication of this final
order, but do not already have a 510(k) clearance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA is also issuing this final order to reclassify multiple use
blood lancets for multiple patient use from class I (general controls)
exempt from premarket notification into class III (premarket approval).
FDA is reclassifying these devices based on the determination that
general controls and special controls together are not sufficient to
provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness for this
device. In addition, in the absence of an established positive benefit-
risk profile, FDA has determined that the risks to health associated
with the use of multiple patient use blood lancets identified
previously present a potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA has published a
final order requiring the filing of a PMA or notice of completion of a
PDP for multiple patient use blood lancets.
FDA has also modified the identification in Sec. 878.4800(a) for
manual surgical instruments for general use to remove the blood lancet
devices from this classification regulation and include them under a
separate classification regulation Sec. 878.4850.
V. Premarket Notification Requirement for Single Patient Use Only Blood
Lancets
FDA is reclassifying single patient use only blood lancets from
class I (general controls) exempt from premarket notification into
class II (special controls) and subject to premarket review. Section
510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class II device
from the premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of
the FD&C Act if FDA determines that premarket notification is not
necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. FDA has determined that premarket
notification is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness for the intended uses of all three types of single
patient use only blood lancets. Therefore, these three device types are
not exempt from premarket notification requirements.
[[Page 66187]]
FDA cleared several 510(k)s for blood lancets prior to exempting
the device types from submission of a premarket notification. These
cleared blood lancets, as well as any 510(k)-exempt blood lancets
legally offered for sale on or before November 22, 2021, can serve as
predicates for substantial equivalence purposes. In order for a single
patient use only blood lancet to fall within this classification, it
would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order.
VI. Implementation Strategy
For the three types of blood lancets being reclassified from class
I (general controls) to class II (special controls), the special
controls identified in this order are effective November 22, 2021. For
the fourth type of blood lancet being reclassified from class I to
class III, FDA is publishing a final order to require the filing of a
PMA or notice of completion of a PDP elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
Blood lancets for single patient use only that have not
been offered for sale prior to November 22, 2021, or have been offered
for sale but are required to submit a new 510(k) under Sec.
807.81(a)(3): Manufacturers are required to obtain 510(k) clearance
before marketing their devices after November 22, 2021. If a
manufacturer markets such a device without receiving 510(k) clearance,
then FDA would consider taking action against such a manufacturer,
under its usual enforcement policies.
Blood lancets for single patient use only that have been
offered for sale prior to November 22, 2021, and do not already have
510(k) clearance: FDA does not intend to enforce compliance with the
510(k) requirement or special controls until November 22, 2022. After
that date, if a manufacturer continues to market such a device but does
not have a 510(k) clearance or FDA determines that the device is not
substantially equivalent or not compliant with the special controls,
then FDA would consider taking action against such manufacturer under
its usual enforcement policies.
For blood lancets for single patient use that have prior 510(k)
clearance, FDA would accept a new 510(k) and would issue a new
clearance letter, as appropriate, indicating substantial equivalence
and compliance with the special controls. These devices could serve as
predicates for new devices. These clearance letters would be made
publicly available in FDA's 510(k) database, and compliance with
special controls at the time of clearance would be stated in the
publicly available 510(k) Summary posted in this database. Because many
blood lancets for single patient use are non-prescription (``over-the-
counter'') devices, FDA believes that our public database is a
transparent tool allowing consumers to confirm that their devices have
been submitted under a new 510(k) and demonstrated conformance to the
applicable special controls.
The timeframes set forth in this section also apply to compliance
with requirements for device labeling (part 801 (21 CFR part 801)),
including the UDI labeling requirements (part 801, subpart B), as well
as device tracking requirements (21 CFR part 821), device reporting
requirements (21 CFR part 803), and GUDID data submission requirements
(21 CFR part 830).
VII. Codification of Orders
Prior to the amendments by the Food and Drug Administration Safety
and Innovation Act (FDASIA), section 513(e) of the FD&C Act provided
for FDA to issue regulations to reclassify devices. Although section
513(e) as amended requires FDA to issue final orders rather than
regulations, FDASIA also provides for FDA to revoke previously issued
regulations by order. FDA will continue to codify classifications and
reclassifications in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Changes
resulting from final orders will appear in the CFR as changes to
codified classification determinations or as newly codified orders.
Therefore, under section 513(e)(1)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act, as amended by
FDASIA, in this final order, we are revoking the requirements in 21 CFR
878.4800 related to the classification of blood lancets as class I
devices and codifying the reclassification of four types of blood
lancets in 21 CFR 878.4850: Single use only blood lancets with an
integral sharps injury prevention feature, single use only blood
lancets without an integral sharps injury prevention feature, and
multiple use blood lancets for single patient use only into class II,
and multiple use blood lancet for multiple patient use into class III.
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
While this final order contains no collection of information, it
does refer to previously approved FDA collections of information.
Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required for this final order. The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 807, subpart E, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814, subparts A through E, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0231; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 820
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0073; the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 830 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0720; and the collections of information in 21 CFR parts
800, 801 and 809 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
The labeling provisions in proposed Sec. 878.4850(a)(2)(vi),
(b)(2)(vi), and (c)(2)(vii) are not subject to review by OMB because
they do not constitute a ``collection of information'' under the PRA.
Rather, the following labeling: (1) ``For use only on a single patient.
Discard the entire device after use.''; (2) ``For use only on a single
patient. Disinfect reusable components according to manufacturer's
instructions between each use.''; (3) ``Used lancet blades must be
safely discarded after a single use.''; (4) ``Warning: Not intended for
more than one use. Do not use on more than one patient. Improper use of
blood lancets can increase the risk of inadvertent transmission of
bloodborne pathogens, particularly in settings where multiple patients
are tested.''; and (5) ``Warning: Do not use on more than one patient.
Improper use of blood lancets can increase the risk of inadvertent
transmission of bloodborne pathogens, particularly in settings where
multiple patients are tested. The cleaning and disinfection
instructions for this device are intended only to reduce the risk of
local use site infection; they cannot render this device safe for use
for more than one patient.'' are a ``public disclosure of information
originally supplied by the Federal Government to the recipient for the
purpose of disclosure to the public'' (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
X. References
The following references marked with an asterisk (*) are on display
at the
[[Page 66188]]
Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500. and are
available for viewing by interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday; they also are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov. References without asterisks are not on
public display at https://www.regulations.gov because they have
copyright restriction. Some may be available at the website address, if
listed. References without asterisks are available for viewing only at
the Dockets Management Staff. FDA has verified the website addresses,
as of the date this document publishes in the Federal Register, but
websites are subject to change over time.
1. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, ``Self-Monitoring Blood
Glucose Test Systems for Over-the-Counter Use,'' September 2020,
available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/self-monitoring-blood-glucose-test-systems-over-counter-use.
2. *Executive Summary, Transcript and other meeting material of the
June 26, 2013, meeting of the General and Plastic Surgery Devices
Panel available at https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170405193132/https:/www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/GeneralandPlasticSurgeryDevicesPanel/ucm349426.htm.
3. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, ``Reprocessing Medical
Devices in Health Care Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling,''
March 17, 2015, available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/reprocessing-medical-devices-health-care-settings-validation-methods-and-labeling.
4. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, ``Blood Glucose
Monitoring Test Systems for Prescription Point-of-Care Use,''
September 2020, available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/blood-glucose-monitoring-test-systems-prescription-point-care-use.
5. *The World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines on Drawing Blood:
Best Practices in Phlebotomy, Part II, 2, Geneva: World Health
Organization, 2010, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138665/.
6. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), GP42 7th Edition,
Collection of Capillary Blood Specimens.
7. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, ``Submission and Review
of Sterility Information in Premarket Notification (510(k))
Submissions for Devices Labeled as Sterile,'' January 21, 2016,
available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/submission-and-review-sterility-information-premarket-notification-510k-submissions-devices-labeled.
8. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, ``Use of International
Standard ISO 10993-1, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices--Part
1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process,''
September 2020, available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/use-international-standard-iso-10993-1-biological-evaluation-medical-devices-part-1-evaluation-and.
9. *``Procedures for Class II Device Exemptions from Premarket
Notification,'' Guidance for Industry and CDRH Staff (Class II
510(k) Exemption Guidance), February 19, 1998, available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/procedures-class-ii-device-exemptions-premarket-notification-guidance-industry-and-cdrh-staff.
10. *FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, ``Bundling Multiple
Devices or Multiple Indications in a Single Submission,'' June 20,
2007, available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/bundling-multiple-devices-or-multiple-indications-single-submission.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
878 is amended as follows:
PART 878--GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 878 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Amend Sec. 878.4800 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 878.4800 Manual surgical instrument for general use.
(a) Identification. A manual surgical instrument for general use is
a nonpowered, hand-held, or hand manipulated device, either reusable or
disposable, intended to be used in various general surgical procedures.
The device includes the applicator, clip applier, biopsy brush, manual
dermabrasion brush, scrub brush, cannula, ligature carrier, chisel,
clamp, contractor, curette, cutter, dissector, elevator, skin graft
expander, file, forceps, gouge, instrument guide, needle guide, hammer,
hemostat, amputation hook, ligature passing and knot-tying instrument,
knife, mallet, disposable or reusable aspiration and injection needle,
disposable or reusable suturing needle, osteotome, pliers, rasp,
retainer, retractor, saw, scalpel blade, scalpel handle, one-piece
scalpel, snare, spatula, stapler, disposable or reusable stripper,
stylet, suturing apparatus for the stomach and intestine, measuring
tape, and calipers. A surgical instrument that has specialized uses in
a specific medical specialty is classified in separate regulations in
parts 868 through 892 of this chapter.
* * * * *
0
3. Add Sec. 878.4850 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 878.4850 Blood lancets.
(a) Single use only blood lancet with an integral sharps injury
prevention feature--(1) Identification. A disposable blood lancet
intended for a single use that is comprised of a single use blade
attached to a solid, non-reusable base (including an integral sharps
injury prevention feature) that is used to puncture the skin to obtain
a drop of blood for diagnostic purposes. The integral sharps injury
prevention feature allows the device to be used once and then renders
it inoperable and incapable of further use.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls are:
(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the
structure and material composition are consistent with the intended use
and must include a sharps injury prevention feature.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device will withstand forces encountered during use and that the
integral sharps injury prevention feature will irreversibly disable the
device after one use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of any device
component that breaches the skin (e.g., blade).
(v) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with illustrations, of the proper use of
the device and its sharps injury prevention feature.
(B) Handwashing instructions for the user before and after use of
the device.
(C) Instructions on preparation (e.g., cleaning, disinfection) of
the skin to be pierced.
(D) Instructions for the safe disposal of the device.
(E) Labeling must be appropriate for the intended use environment.
(1) For those devices intended for health care settings, labeling
must address the health care facility use of these devices, including
how these lancets are to be used with personal protective equipment,
such as gloves.
[[Page 66189]]
(2) For those devices intended for use in the home, labeling must
be written so that it is understandable to lay users.
(vi) Labeling must also include the following statements,
prominently placed:
(A) ``For use only on a single patient. Discard the entire device
after use.''
(B) ``Warning: Not intended for more than one use. Do not use on
more than one patient. Improper use of blood lancets can increase the
risk of inadvertent transmission of bloodborne pathogens, particularly
in settings where multiple patients are tested.''
(b) Single use only blood lancet without an integral sharps injury
prevention feature--(1) Identification. A disposable blood lancet
intended for a single use that is comprised of a single use blade
attached to a solid, non-reusable base that is used to puncture the
skin to obtain a drop of blood for diagnostic purposes.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls are:
(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the
structure and material composition are consistent with the intended use
and address the risk of sharp object injuries and bloodborne pathogen
transmissions.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device will withstand forces encountered during use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of any device
component that breaches the skin (e.g., blade).
(v) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with illustrations, of the proper use of
the device.
(B) Handwashing instructions for the user before and after use of
the device.
(C) Instructions on preparation (e.g., cleaning, disinfection) of
the skin to be pierced.
(D) Instructions for the safe disposal of the device.
(E) Labeling must be appropriate for the intended use environment.
(1) For those devices intended for health care settings, labeling
must address the health care facility use of these devices, including
how these lancets are to be used with personal protective equipment,
such as gloves.
(2) For those devices intended for use in the home, labeling must
be written so that it is understandable to lay users.
(vi) Labeling must also include the following statements,
prominently placed:
(A) ``For use only on a single patient. Discard the entire device
after use.''
(B) ``Warning: Not intended for more than one use. Do not use on
more than one patient. Improper use of blood lancets can increase the
risk of inadvertent transmission of bloodborne pathogens, particularly
in settings where multiple patients are tested.''
(c) Multiple use blood lancet for single patient use only--(1)
Identification. A multiple use capable blood lancet intended for use on
a single patient that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a
solid, reusable base that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop
of blood for diagnostic purposes.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls are:
(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that:
(A) The lancet blade can be changed with every use, either manually
or by triggering a blade storage unit to discard the used blade and
reload an unused blade into the reusable base; and
(B) The structure and material composition are consistent with the
intended use and address the risk of sharp object injuries and
bloodborne pathogen transmissions and allow for validated cleaning and
disinfection.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device will withstand forces encountered during use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of any device
component that breaches the skin (e.g., blade).
(v) Validation testing must demonstrate that the cleaning and
disinfection instructions are adequate to ensure that the reusable
lancet base can be cleaned and low level disinfected.
(vi) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with illustrations, of the proper use of
the device.
(B) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered
disinfectant's contact time for disinfectant use.
(C) Handwashing instructions for the user before and after use of
the device.
(D) Instructions on preparation (e.g., cleaning, disinfection) of
the skin to be pierced.
(E) Instructions on the cleaning and disinfection of the device.
(F) Instructions for the safe disposal of the device.
(G) Instructions for use must address the safe storage of the
reusable blood lancet base between uses to minimize contamination or
damage and the safe storage and disposal of the refill lancet blades.
(H) Labeling must be appropriate for the intended use environment.
(1) For those devices intended for health care settings, labeling
must address the health care facility use of these devices, including
how these lancets are to be used with personal protective equipment,
such as gloves.
(2) For those devices intended for use in the home, labeling must
be written so that it is understandable to lay users.
(vii) Labeling must also include the following statements,
prominently placed:
(A) ``For use only on a single patient. Disinfect reusable
components according to manufacturer's instructions between each use.''
(B) ``Used lancet blades must be safely discarded after a single
use.''
(C) ``Warning: Do not use on more than one patient. Improper use of
blood lancets can increase the risk of inadvertent transmission of
bloodborne pathogens, particularly in settings where multiple patients
are tested. The cleaning and disinfection instructions for this device
are intended only to reduce the risk of local use site infection; they
cannot render this device safe for use for more than one patient.''
(d) Multiple use blood lancet for multiple patient use--(1)
Identification. A multiple use capable blood lancet intended for use on
multiple patients that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a
solid, reusable base that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop
of blood for diagnostic purposes.
(2) Classification. Class III (premarket approval).
Dated: November 16, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-25376 Filed 11-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P