Safety Zone; Haro Strait, San Juan County, WA, 64372-64373 [2021-25198]
Download as PDF
64372
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0872]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Haro Strait, San Juan
County, WA
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary moving safety
zone for navigable waters within a 500yard radius around the ZIM KINGSTON.
The safety zone is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from the potential hazards
associated with the vessel transit. Entry
of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Puget Sound.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from November 18, 2021,
until November 29, 2021. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from November 15, 2021,
until November 18, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0872 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Commander Samud
Looney, Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 206–217–6051, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland
Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule, as the Coast
Guard received initial notification on
October 31, 2021, of an anticipated
vessel transit from Victoria, BC, to
Vancouver, BC, through U.S. Waters by
the ZIM KINGSTON. On or around
October 21, 2021, the ZIM KINGSTON
lost containers overboard and two
containers subsequently caught on fire
and may contain toxic flammable gas or
other hazardous materials. Immediate
action is needed to respond to the
potential safety hazards associated with
the ZIM KINGSTON’s transit. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM for
this temporary rule because the safety
zone must be established by November
15, 2021, to protect waterway users.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from the potential
hazards associated with the vessel
transit of the ZIM KINGSTON.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port (COTP) Puget Sound
has determined that potential hazards
associated with the transit of the ZIM
KINGSTON will be a safety concern for
anyone within a 500-yard radius of the
vessel. This rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in the navigable waters
within the safety zone during the
transit.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from 9:00 a.m.. November 15, 2021,
through 9 a.m. November 29, 2021. The
safety zone will cover all navigable
waters within 500 yards of the ZIM
KINGSTON. The duration of the zone is
intended to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in these
navigable waters while the vessel is in
transit. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the fact that the safety zone
created by this rule is limited in size
and duration. Vessel traffic would be
able to safely transit around this safety
zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels
to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone for navigable waters within a 500yard radius around the ZIM KINGSTON
between November 15, 2021, to
November 29, 2021. The safety zone is
needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from the
potential hazards associated with the
vessel transit. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L[60] of Appendix A, Table 1
of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 1.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by VHF Channel 16.
Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Effective date. This section is
effective without actual notice from
November 18, 2021, until November 29,
2021. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from
November 15, 2021, until November 18,
2021.
Dated: November 15, 2021.
P.M. Hilbert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2021–25198 Filed 11–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0800]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Umbach Fireworks
Scattering, Yellow Bluff San Francisco
Bay, Sausalito, CA
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
AGENCY:
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
SUMMARY:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
2. Add § 165.T13–0872 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–0872 Safety Zone; Haro Strait,
San Juan County, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
moving safety zone: All navigable
waters within a 500-yard radius around
the ZIM KINGSTON.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64373
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the San
Francisco Bay near Yellow Bluff in
Sausalito, CA in support of a fireworks
display on December 3, 2021. The safety
zone is necessary to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards created by
pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or remaining in
the safety zone without the permission
of the Captain of the Port San Francisco
or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 4 p.m.
until 6:15 p.m. on December 3, 2021.
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 220 (Thursday, November 18, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64372-64373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25198]
[[Page 64372]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2021-0872]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Haro Strait, San Juan County, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving safety zone
for navigable waters within a 500-yard radius around the ZIM KINGSTON.
The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from the potential hazards associated with the vessel
transit. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Puget
Sound.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from November 18,
2021, until November 29, 2021. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from November 15, 2021, until November 18, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0872 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Samud Looney, Sector Puget Sound
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-
6051, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule, as the Coast Guard received initial
notification on October 31, 2021, of an anticipated vessel transit from
Victoria, BC, to Vancouver, BC, through U.S. Waters by the ZIM
KINGSTON. On or around October 21, 2021, the ZIM KINGSTON lost
containers overboard and two containers subsequently caught on fire and
may contain toxic flammable gas or other hazardous materials. Immediate
action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated
with the ZIM KINGSTON's transit. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM
for this temporary rule because the safety zone must be established by
November 15, 2021, to protect waterway users.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from the
potential hazards associated with the vessel transit of the ZIM
KINGSTON.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port (COTP) Puget
Sound has determined that potential hazards associated with the transit
of the ZIM KINGSTON will be a safety concern for anyone within a 500-
yard radius of the vessel. This rule is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the
safety zone during the transit.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from 9:00 a.m.. November 15,
2021, through 9 a.m. November 29, 2021. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters within 500 yards of the ZIM KINGSTON. The duration of
the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in these navigable waters while the vessel is in transit.
No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that the
safety zone created by this rule is limited in size and duration.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely transit around this safety zone.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow
vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
[[Page 64373]]
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone for navigable waters within a 500-yard radius around the
ZIM KINGSTON between November 15, 2021, to November 29, 2021. The
safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from the potential hazards associated with the vessel
transit. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L[60] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0872 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-0872 Safety Zone; Haro Strait, San Juan County, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a moving safety zone: All
navigable waters within a 500-yard radius around the ZIM KINGSTON.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF Channel 16. Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(d) Effective date. This section is effective without actual notice
from November 18, 2021, until November 29, 2021. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from November 15, 2021, until
November 18, 2021.
Dated: November 15, 2021.
P.M. Hilbert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2021-25198 Filed 11-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P