Protection of Privacy and Access to and Amendment of Individual Records Under the Privacy Act of 1974; Technical Amendment, 64367-64369 [2021-25067]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
On
November 12, 2021, the Secretary of
Labor ratified an interim final rule
codifying an emergency temporary
standard to protect unvaccinated
employees of large employers from the
risk of contracting COVID–19. See
Interim Final Rule, COVID–19
Vaccination and Testing; Emergency
Temporary Standard, 86 FR 61402
(November 5, 2021) (the ‘‘Interim Final
Rule’’). The Department is now
publishing the ratification in the
Federal Register out of an abundance of
caution. Neither the ratification nor the
publication is a statement that the
ratified action would be invalid absent
the ratification, whether published or
otherwise.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Appendix
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Ratification
By virtue of the authority vested in the
Secretary of Labor by law, including 33
U.S.C. 941 and 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657, I am
affirming and ratifying a prior action by
Acting Assistant Secretary James S.
Frederick. On November 5, 2021, the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration published in the Federal
Register an interim final rule codifying an
emergency temporary standard to protect
unvaccinated employees of large employers
from the risk of contracting COVID–19. See
Interim Final Rule, COVID–19 Vaccination
and Testing; Emergency Temporary
Standard, 86 FR 61402 (November 5, 2021)
(the ‘‘Interim Final Rule’’).
The Interim Final Rule was signed by
James S. Frederick, Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, who was serving as Acting
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health before the current
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health assumed office. Questions
have been raised in litigation, however,
concerning Mr. Frederick’s authority to sign
the interim final rule.
Out of an abundance of caution, to avoid
any doubt as to its validity, I have
independently evaluated the Interim Final
Rule and the basis for adopting it. I now
affirm and ratify the Interim Final Rule,
without deference to Mr. Frederick’s prior
decision. In my considered and independent
judgment, the Interim Final Rule was and
remains necessary to protect unvaccinated
employees against the grave danger of
exposure to the virus that causes COVID–19.
I have full and complete knowledge of the
Interim Final Rule action taken by former
Acting Assistant Secretary Frederick. I have
also determined that the assessment of grave
danger in the Interim Final Rule and the
Rule’s assessment of how best to respond to
that danger remain valid based on my
assessment of the situation at the time of this
ratification. Pursuant to my authority as the
Secretary of Labor, and based on my
independent review of the action and the
reasons for taking it, I hereby affirm and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
ratify the Interim Final Rule, as of October
26, 2021.
Martin J. Walsh,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2021–25167 Filed 11–15–21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4510–HL–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD–2021–OS–0088]
RIN 0790–AL42
Protection of Privacy and Access to
and Amendment of Individual Records
Under the Privacy Act of 1974;
Technical Amendment
Department of Defense (DoD).
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
DoD is making a technical
amendment to reinstate an appendix to
its Privacy Program regulation that was
erroneously deleted when the regulation
was previously revised. The appendix
contained a list of blanket routine uses
that are included by reference in many
DoD Privacy Act systems of records
notices (SORNs).
DATES: This rule is effective November
18, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lyn Kirby, OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil;
(703) 571–0070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule amends 32 CFR part 310,
‘‘Protection of Privacy and Access to
and Amendment of Individual Records
under the Privacy Act of 1974,’’ to
reinstate DoD’s blanket routine uses.
The appendix which enumerated DoD’s
blanket routine uses was erroneously
removed when 32 CFR part 310 was
revised on April 11, 2019 (84 FR 14728–
14811).
A ‘‘routine use’’ is defined in the
Privacy Act as ‘‘with respect to the
disclosure of a record, the use of such
record for a purpose which is
compatible with the purpose for which
it was collected.’’ See 5 U.S.C.
552a(a)(7). Routine uses are included in
individual agency SORNs to allow the
agency to disclose records from a
particular system of records to
individuals or entities in accordance
with the terms of the routine use. Some
agencies have established a set of
routine uses that apply to a wide array
of published agency SORNs, sometimes
referred to as blanket routine uses. Their
purpose is to provide consistent
information sharing authority across the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64367
SORNs for common or noncontroversial purposes. Examples of
routine uses that are typically included
in blanket routine uses are ones that
allow agencies to share information
with members of Congress inquiring on
behalf of a constituent, with the
Department of Justice when litigation
arises, and with agency contractors for
purposes outlined in the contract.
DoD had previously published a list
of 14 blanket routine uses in an
appendix to a prior publication of the
DoD Privacy Program regulation on
April 13, 2007 (72 FR 18758). In the
2019 update, all appendices to the prior
regulation were removed; however, the
appendix containing the DoD blanket
routine uses (appendix C) should have
remained because numerous DoD
SORNs refer to and incorporate the
blanket routine uses to support
necessary information sharing. This
technical amendment seeks to remedy
this error by restoring the blanket
routine uses as appendix A to part 310.
This will provide clear public notice of
the existence and ongoing use of the
blanket routine uses at DoD. A list of
DoD’s blanket routine uses has also
continued to be available on the DoD
Privacy Program website since the DoD
Privacy Program regulation was
published in 2019.
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. It has been determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory
action.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that this rule
does not involve a Federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
64368
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
$100 million or more and that it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
The Director of Administration and
Management certified that this rule does
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because it is concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of
records within the DoD.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that this rule
does not impose information collection
or record keeping requirements on the
public under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that this rule
does not have federalism implications.
This rule does not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
It has been determined that this rule
does not have a substantial effect on
Indian tribal governments. This rule
does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on one or more Indian
tribes, preempt tribal law, or effect the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 310 continues to read as follows:
■
2. Appendix A is added to read as
follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
■
Appendix A to Part 310—DOD Blanket
Routine Uses
A. Routine Use—Law Enforcement
If a system of records maintained by a DoD
Component to carry out its functions
indicates a violation or potential violation of
law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in
Jkt 256001
A record from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be
disclosed as a routine use to a Federal, State,
or local agency maintaining civil, criminal, or
other relevant enforcement information or
other pertinent information, such as current
licenses, if necessary to obtain information
relevant to a Component decision concerning
the hiring or retention of an employee, the
issuance of a security clearance, the letting of
a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant,
or other benefit.
C. Routine Use—Disclosure of Requested
Information
A record from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be
disclosed to a Federal agency, in response to
its request, in connection with the hiring or
retention of an employee, the issuance of a
security clearance, the reporting of an
investigation of an employee, the letting of a
contract, or the issuance of a license, grant,
or other benefit by the requesting agency, to
the extent that the information is relevant
and necessary to the requesting agency’s
decision on the matter.
D. Routine Use—Congressional Inquiries
Disclosure from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be made to
a congressional office from the record of an
individual in response to an inquiry from the
congressional office made at the request of
that individual.
Relevant information contained in all
systems of records of the Department of
Defense published on or before August 22,
1975, may be disclosed to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in
connection with the review of private relief
legislation as set forth in OMB Circular A–
19 at any stage of the legislative coordination
and clearance process as set forth in that
circular.
F. Routine Use—Disclosures Required by
International Agreements
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
B. Routine Use—Disclosure When
Requesting Information
E. Routine Use—Private Relief Legislation
PART 310—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY
AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT
OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER
THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
VerDate Sep<11>2014
nature, and whether arising by general statute
or by regulation, rule, or order issued
pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the
system of records may be referred, as a
routine use, to the agency concerned,
whether Federal, State, local, or foreign,
charged with the responsibility of
investigating or prosecuting such violation or
charged with enforcing or implementing the
statute, rule, regulation, or order issued
pursuant thereto.
A record from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be
disclosed to foreign law enforcement,
security, investigatory, or administrative
authorities to comply with requirements
imposed by, or to claim rights conferred in,
international agreements and arrangements,
including those regulating the stationing and
status in foreign countries of Department of
Defense military and civilian personnel.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
G. Routine Use—Disclosure to State and
Local Taxing Authorities
Any information normally contained in
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form W–2
which is maintained in a record from a
system of records maintained by a
Component may be disclosed to State and
local taxing authorities with which the
Secretary of the Treasury has entered into
agreements under 5 U.S.C., sections 5516,
5517, 5520, and only to those State and local
taxing authorities for which an employee or
military member is or was subject to tax
regardless of whether tax is or was withheld.
This routine use is in accordance with
Treasury Fiscal Requirements Manual
Bulletin No. 76–07.
H. Routine Use—Disclosure to the Office of
Personnel Management
A record from a system of records subject
to the Privacy Act and maintained by a
Component may be disclosed to the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) concerning
information on pay and leave, benefits,
retirement reductions, and any other
information necessary for the OPM to carry
out its legally authorized government-wide
personnel management functions and
studies.
I. Routine Use—Disclosure to the
Department of Justice for Litigation
A record from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be
disclosed as a routine use to any component
of the Department of Justice for the purpose
of representing the Department of Defense, or
any officer, employee or member of the
Department in pending or potential litigation
to which the record is pertinent.
J. Routine Use—Disclosure to Military
Banking Facilities
Information as to current military
addresses and assignments may be provided
to military banking facilities who provide
banking services overseas and who are
reimbursed by the Government for certain
checking and loan losses. For personnel
separated, discharged, or retired from the
Armed Forces, information as to last known
residential or home of record address may be
provided to the military banking facility
upon certification by a banking facility
officer that the facility has a returned or
dishonored check negotiated by the
individual or the individual has defaulted on
a loan and that if restitution is not made by
the individual, the U.S. Government will be
liable for the losses the facility may incur.
K. Routine Use—Disclosure of Information
to the General Services Administration
A record from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be
disclosed as a routine use to the General
Services Administration (GSA) for the
purpose of records management inspections
conducted under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904
and 2906.
L. Routine Use—Disclosure of Information to
the National Archives and Records
Administration
A record from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
disclosed as a routine use to the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA) for the purpose of records
management inspections conducted under
authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.
representative. The operator of any
vessel in the regulated area must
comply with instructions from the Coast
Guard or designated representative.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
M. Routine Use—Disclosure to the Merit
Systems Protection Board
A record from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be
disclosed as a routine use to the Merit
Systems Protection Board, including the
Office of the Special Counsel, for the purpose
of litigation, including administrative
proceedings, appeals, special studies of the
civil service and other merit systems, review
of OPM or Component rules and regulations,
investigation of alleged or possible
prohibited personnel practices, including
administrative proceedings involving any
individual subject of a DoD investigation,
and such other functions, promulgated in 5
U.S.C. 1205 and 1206 or as may be
authorized by law.
DATES:
The regulation in 33 CFR
100.702, Table 1 to § 100.702, Line 11,
will be enforced on December 11, 2021,
from 2:30 p.m. through 11:30 p.m.
33 CFR Part 165
If
you have questions about this notice of
enforcement, call or email Mr. Omar
Beceiro, Sector Miami Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard: Telephone: 305–535–4317,
Email: Omar.Beceiro@uscg.mil.
Safety Zone; Steak Restaurant
Fireworks, San Francisco Bay, San
Francisco, CA
N. Routine Use—Counterintelligence
Purposes
A record from a system of records
maintained by a Component may be
disclosed as a routine use outside the DoD or
the U.S. Government for the purpose of
counterintelligence activities authorized by
U.S. law or Executive order or for the
purpose of enforcing laws that protect the
national security of the United States.
Dated: November 12, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–25067 Filed 11–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0205]
Special Local Regulation: Seminole
Hard Rock Winterfest Holiday Boat
Parade
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a special local regulation on December
11, 2021, from 2:30 p.m. through 11:30
p.m. to provide for the safety and
security of certain navigable waterways
during the Seminole Hard Rock
Winterfest Holiday Boat Parade. All
non-participant persons and vessels will
be prohibited from entering, transiting,
anchoring, or remaining within the
regulated area during the enforcement
period unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Miami or a designated
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
64369
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Coast
Guard will enforce a special local
regulation for the Seminole Hard Rock
Winterfest Holiday Boat Parade
published in 33 CFR 100.702, Table 1 to
§ 100.702, Line 11 on December 11,
2021, from 2:30 p.m. through 11:30 p.m.
This action is being taken to provide for
the safety and security of certain
navigable waters of the Intracoastal
Waterway during this one-day event.
Our regulation for marine events within
the Seventh Coast Guard District,
§ 100.702, specifies the location of the
special local regulation for the Seminole
Hard Rock Winterfest Holiday Boat
Parade, which includes a moving buffer
zone of 50 yards around the parade as
it travels along the New River and
Intracoastal Waterway in Ft. Lauderdale,
FL. Only event sponsor designated
participants and official patrol vessels
may enter the regulated area. Spectator
vessels may contact the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander to request
permission to pass through the
regulated area. If granted permission,
vessels must pass directly through the
regulated area at a safe speed without
loitering.
In addition to this notice of
enforcement in the Federal Register. the
Coast Guard will inform the public
through Local Notice to Mariners and
marine information broadcasts at least
24 hours in advance of the enforcement
of the special local regulation.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 11, 2021.
J.F. Burdian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard,Captain of the Port
Miami.
[FR Doc. 2021–25149 Filed 11–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Coast Guard
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0813]
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the San
Francisco Bay near Rincon Point in San
Francisco in support of a fireworks
display on December 18, 2021. The
safety zone is necessary to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
created by pyrotechnics. Unauthorized
persons or vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or
remaining in the safety zone without the
permission of the Captain of the Port
San Francisco or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 9 a.m.
on December 18, 2021, until 12:45 a.m.
on December 19, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0813 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
DATES:
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Anthony I. Solares,
U.S. Coast Guard District 11, Sector San
Francisco, at 415–399–3585,
SFWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 220 (Thursday, November 18, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64367-64369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25067]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD-2021-OS-0088]
RIN 0790-AL42
Protection of Privacy and Access to and Amendment of Individual
Records Under the Privacy Act of 1974; Technical Amendment
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is making a technical amendment to reinstate an appendix
to its Privacy Program regulation that was erroneously deleted when the
regulation was previously revised. The appendix contained a list of
blanket routine uses that are included by reference in many DoD Privacy
Act systems of records notices (SORNs).
DATES: This rule is effective November 18, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lyn Kirby, [email protected];
(703) 571-0070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends 32 CFR part 310,
``Protection of Privacy and Access to and Amendment of Individual
Records under the Privacy Act of 1974,'' to reinstate DoD's blanket
routine uses. The appendix which enumerated DoD's blanket routine uses
was erroneously removed when 32 CFR part 310 was revised on April 11,
2019 (84 FR 14728-14811).
A ``routine use'' is defined in the Privacy Act as ``with respect
to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose
which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected.'' See
5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(7). Routine uses are included in individual agency
SORNs to allow the agency to disclose records from a particular system
of records to individuals or entities in accordance with the terms of
the routine use. Some agencies have established a set of routine uses
that apply to a wide array of published agency SORNs, sometimes
referred to as blanket routine uses. Their purpose is to provide
consistent information sharing authority across the SORNs for common or
non-controversial purposes. Examples of routine uses that are typically
included in blanket routine uses are ones that allow agencies to share
information with members of Congress inquiring on behalf of a
constituent, with the Department of Justice when litigation arises, and
with agency contractors for purposes outlined in the contract.
DoD had previously published a list of 14 blanket routine uses in
an appendix to a prior publication of the DoD Privacy Program
regulation on April 13, 2007 (72 FR 18758). In the 2019 update, all
appendices to the prior regulation were removed; however, the appendix
containing the DoD blanket routine uses (appendix C) should have
remained because numerous DoD SORNs refer to and incorporate the
blanket routine uses to support necessary information sharing. This
technical amendment seeks to remedy this error by restoring the blanket
routine uses as appendix A to part 310. This will provide clear public
notice of the existence and ongoing use of the blanket routine uses at
DoD. A list of DoD's blanket routine uses has also continued to be
available on the DoD Privacy Program website since the DoD Privacy
Program regulation was published in 2019.
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. It has been determined that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that this rule does not involve a Federal
mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
[[Page 64368]]
$100 million or more and that it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
The Director of Administration and Management certified that this
rule does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it is concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the DoD.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that this rule does not impose information
collection or record keeping requirements on the public under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that this rule does not have federalism
implications. This rule does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments''
It has been determined that this rule does not have a substantial
effect on Indian tribal governments. This rule does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian tribes,
preempt tribal law, or effect the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is amended as follows:
PART 310--PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT OF
INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Appendix A is added to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 310--DOD Blanket Routine Uses
A. Routine Use--Law Enforcement
If a system of records maintained by a DoD Component to carry
out its functions indicates a violation or potential violation of
law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, and whether
arising by general statute or by regulation, rule, or order issued
pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the system of records may
be referred, as a routine use, to the agency concerned, whether
Federal, State, local, or foreign, charged with the responsibility
of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with
enforcing or implementing the statute, rule, regulation, or order
issued pursuant thereto.
B. Routine Use--Disclosure When Requesting Information
A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may
be disclosed as a routine use to a Federal, State, or local agency
maintaining civil, criminal, or other relevant enforcement
information or other pertinent information, such as current
licenses, if necessary to obtain information relevant to a Component
decision concerning the hiring or retention of an employee, the
issuance of a security clearance, the letting of a contract, or the
issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit.
C. Routine Use--Disclosure of Requested Information
A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may
be disclosed to a Federal agency, in response to its request, in
connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance
of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an
employee, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license,
grant, or other benefit by the requesting agency, to the extent that
the information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency's
decision on the matter.
D. Routine Use--Congressional Inquiries
Disclosure from a system of records maintained by a Component
may be made to a congressional office from the record of an
individual in response to an inquiry from the congressional office
made at the request of that individual.
E. Routine Use--Private Relief Legislation
Relevant information contained in all systems of records of the
Department of Defense published on or before August 22, 1975, may be
disclosed to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in connection
with the review of private relief legislation as set forth in OMB
Circular A-19 at any stage of the legislative coordination and
clearance process as set forth in that circular.
F. Routine Use--Disclosures Required by International Agreements
A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may
be disclosed to foreign law enforcement, security, investigatory, or
administrative authorities to comply with requirements imposed by,
or to claim rights conferred in, international agreements and
arrangements, including those regulating the stationing and status
in foreign countries of Department of Defense military and civilian
personnel.
G. Routine Use--Disclosure to State and Local Taxing Authorities
Any information normally contained in Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) Form W-2 which is maintained in a record from a system of
records maintained by a Component may be disclosed to State and
local taxing authorities with which the Secretary of the Treasury
has entered into agreements under 5 U.S.C., sections 5516, 5517,
5520, and only to those State and local taxing authorities for which
an employee or military member is or was subject to tax regardless
of whether tax is or was withheld. This routine use is in accordance
with Treasury Fiscal Requirements Manual Bulletin No. 76-07.
H. Routine Use--Disclosure to the Office of Personnel Management
A record from a system of records subject to the Privacy Act and
maintained by a Component may be disclosed to the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) concerning information on pay and leave,
benefits, retirement reductions, and any other information necessary
for the OPM to carry out its legally authorized government-wide
personnel management functions and studies.
I. Routine Use--Disclosure to the Department of Justice for Litigation
A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may
be disclosed as a routine use to any component of the Department of
Justice for the purpose of representing the Department of Defense,
or any officer, employee or member of the Department in pending or
potential litigation to which the record is pertinent.
J. Routine Use--Disclosure to Military Banking Facilities
Information as to current military addresses and assignments may
be provided to military banking facilities who provide banking
services overseas and who are reimbursed by the Government for
certain checking and loan losses. For personnel separated,
discharged, or retired from the Armed Forces, information as to last
known residential or home of record address may be provided to the
military banking facility upon certification by a banking facility
officer that the facility has a returned or dishonored check
negotiated by the individual or the individual has defaulted on a
loan and that if restitution is not made by the individual, the U.S.
Government will be liable for the losses the facility may incur.
K. Routine Use--Disclosure of Information to the General Services
Administration
A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may
be disclosed as a routine use to the General Services Administration
(GSA) for the purpose of records management inspections conducted
under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.
L. Routine Use--Disclosure of Information to the National Archives and
Records Administration
A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may
be
[[Page 64369]]
disclosed as a routine use to the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA) for the purpose of records management
inspections conducted under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.
M. Routine Use--Disclosure to the Merit Systems Protection Board
A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may
be disclosed as a routine use to the Merit Systems Protection Board,
including the Office of the Special Counsel, for the purpose of
litigation, including administrative proceedings, appeals, special
studies of the civil service and other merit systems, review of OPM
or Component rules and regulations, investigation of alleged or
possible prohibited personnel practices, including administrative
proceedings involving any individual subject of a DoD investigation,
and such other functions, promulgated in 5 U.S.C. 1205 and 1206 or
as may be authorized by law.
N. Routine Use--Counterintelligence Purposes
A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may
be disclosed as a routine use outside the DoD or the U.S. Government
for the purpose of counterintelligence activities authorized by U.S.
law or Executive order or for the purpose of enforcing laws that
protect the national security of the United States.
Dated: November 12, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-25067 Filed 11-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P