Protection of Privacy and Access to and Amendment of Individual Records Under the Privacy Act of 1974; Technical Amendment, 64367-64369 [2021-25067]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations On November 12, 2021, the Secretary of Labor ratified an interim final rule codifying an emergency temporary standard to protect unvaccinated employees of large employers from the risk of contracting COVID–19. See Interim Final Rule, COVID–19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard, 86 FR 61402 (November 5, 2021) (the ‘‘Interim Final Rule’’). The Department is now publishing the ratification in the Federal Register out of an abundance of caution. Neither the ratification nor the publication is a statement that the ratified action would be invalid absent the ratification, whether published or otherwise. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Appendix khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES Ratification By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of Labor by law, including 33 U.S.C. 941 and 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657, I am affirming and ratifying a prior action by Acting Assistant Secretary James S. Frederick. On November 5, 2021, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration published in the Federal Register an interim final rule codifying an emergency temporary standard to protect unvaccinated employees of large employers from the risk of contracting COVID–19. See Interim Final Rule, COVID–19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard, 86 FR 61402 (November 5, 2021) (the ‘‘Interim Final Rule’’). The Interim Final Rule was signed by James S. Frederick, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, who was serving as Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health before the current Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health assumed office. Questions have been raised in litigation, however, concerning Mr. Frederick’s authority to sign the interim final rule. Out of an abundance of caution, to avoid any doubt as to its validity, I have independently evaluated the Interim Final Rule and the basis for adopting it. I now affirm and ratify the Interim Final Rule, without deference to Mr. Frederick’s prior decision. In my considered and independent judgment, the Interim Final Rule was and remains necessary to protect unvaccinated employees against the grave danger of exposure to the virus that causes COVID–19. I have full and complete knowledge of the Interim Final Rule action taken by former Acting Assistant Secretary Frederick. I have also determined that the assessment of grave danger in the Interim Final Rule and the Rule’s assessment of how best to respond to that danger remain valid based on my assessment of the situation at the time of this ratification. Pursuant to my authority as the Secretary of Labor, and based on my independent review of the action and the reasons for taking it, I hereby affirm and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Nov 17, 2021 Jkt 256001 ratify the Interim Final Rule, as of October 26, 2021. Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor. [FR Doc. 2021–25167 Filed 11–15–21; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 4510–HL–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary 32 CFR Part 310 [Docket ID: DoD–2021–OS–0088] RIN 0790–AL42 Protection of Privacy and Access to and Amendment of Individual Records Under the Privacy Act of 1974; Technical Amendment Department of Defense (DoD). Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: DoD is making a technical amendment to reinstate an appendix to its Privacy Program regulation that was erroneously deleted when the regulation was previously revised. The appendix contained a list of blanket routine uses that are included by reference in many DoD Privacy Act systems of records notices (SORNs). DATES: This rule is effective November 18, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lyn Kirby, OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil; (703) 571–0070. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends 32 CFR part 310, ‘‘Protection of Privacy and Access to and Amendment of Individual Records under the Privacy Act of 1974,’’ to reinstate DoD’s blanket routine uses. The appendix which enumerated DoD’s blanket routine uses was erroneously removed when 32 CFR part 310 was revised on April 11, 2019 (84 FR 14728– 14811). A ‘‘routine use’’ is defined in the Privacy Act as ‘‘with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected.’’ See 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(7). Routine uses are included in individual agency SORNs to allow the agency to disclose records from a particular system of records to individuals or entities in accordance with the terms of the routine use. Some agencies have established a set of routine uses that apply to a wide array of published agency SORNs, sometimes referred to as blanket routine uses. Their purpose is to provide consistent information sharing authority across the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 64367 SORNs for common or noncontroversial purposes. Examples of routine uses that are typically included in blanket routine uses are ones that allow agencies to share information with members of Congress inquiring on behalf of a constituent, with the Department of Justice when litigation arises, and with agency contractors for purposes outlined in the contract. DoD had previously published a list of 14 blanket routine uses in an appendix to a prior publication of the DoD Privacy Program regulation on April 13, 2007 (72 FR 18758). In the 2019 update, all appendices to the prior regulation were removed; however, the appendix containing the DoD blanket routine uses (appendix C) should have remained because numerous DoD SORNs refer to and incorporate the blanket routine uses to support necessary information sharing. This technical amendment seeks to remedy this error by restoring the blanket routine uses as appendix A to part 310. This will provide clear public notice of the existence and ongoing use of the blanket routine uses at DoD. A list of DoD’s blanket routine uses has also continued to be available on the DoD Privacy Program website since the DoD Privacy Program regulation was published in 2019. Regulatory Analysis Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ and Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. It has been determined that this rule is not a significant regulatory action. Congressional Review Act This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Section 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ It has been determined that this rule does not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM 18NOR1 64368 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations $100 million or more and that it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) The Director of Administration and Management certified that this rule does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it is concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the DoD. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) It has been determined that this rule does not impose information collection or record keeping requirements on the public under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ It has been determined that this rule does not have federalism implications. This rule does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments’’ It has been determined that this rule does not have a substantial effect on Indian tribal governments. This rule does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian tribes, preempt tribal law, or effect the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310 Privacy. Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is amended as follows: 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as follows: ■ 2. Appendix A is added to read as follows: khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES ■ Appendix A to Part 310—DOD Blanket Routine Uses A. Routine Use—Law Enforcement If a system of records maintained by a DoD Component to carry out its functions indicates a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in Jkt 256001 A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be disclosed as a routine use to a Federal, State, or local agency maintaining civil, criminal, or other relevant enforcement information or other pertinent information, such as current licenses, if necessary to obtain information relevant to a Component decision concerning the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit. C. Routine Use—Disclosure of Requested Information A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be disclosed to a Federal agency, in response to its request, in connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an employee, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit by the requesting agency, to the extent that the information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency’s decision on the matter. D. Routine Use—Congressional Inquiries Disclosure from a system of records maintained by a Component may be made to a congressional office from the record of an individual in response to an inquiry from the congressional office made at the request of that individual. Relevant information contained in all systems of records of the Department of Defense published on or before August 22, 1975, may be disclosed to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in connection with the review of private relief legislation as set forth in OMB Circular A– 19 at any stage of the legislative coordination and clearance process as set forth in that circular. F. Routine Use—Disclosures Required by International Agreements Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a. 16:09 Nov 17, 2021 B. Routine Use—Disclosure When Requesting Information E. Routine Use—Private Relief Legislation PART 310—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 VerDate Sep<11>2014 nature, and whether arising by general statute or by regulation, rule, or order issued pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the system of records may be referred, as a routine use, to the agency concerned, whether Federal, State, local, or foreign, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto. A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be disclosed to foreign law enforcement, security, investigatory, or administrative authorities to comply with requirements imposed by, or to claim rights conferred in, international agreements and arrangements, including those regulating the stationing and status in foreign countries of Department of Defense military and civilian personnel. PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 G. Routine Use—Disclosure to State and Local Taxing Authorities Any information normally contained in Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form W–2 which is maintained in a record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be disclosed to State and local taxing authorities with which the Secretary of the Treasury has entered into agreements under 5 U.S.C., sections 5516, 5517, 5520, and only to those State and local taxing authorities for which an employee or military member is or was subject to tax regardless of whether tax is or was withheld. This routine use is in accordance with Treasury Fiscal Requirements Manual Bulletin No. 76–07. H. Routine Use—Disclosure to the Office of Personnel Management A record from a system of records subject to the Privacy Act and maintained by a Component may be disclosed to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) concerning information on pay and leave, benefits, retirement reductions, and any other information necessary for the OPM to carry out its legally authorized government-wide personnel management functions and studies. I. Routine Use—Disclosure to the Department of Justice for Litigation A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be disclosed as a routine use to any component of the Department of Justice for the purpose of representing the Department of Defense, or any officer, employee or member of the Department in pending or potential litigation to which the record is pertinent. J. Routine Use—Disclosure to Military Banking Facilities Information as to current military addresses and assignments may be provided to military banking facilities who provide banking services overseas and who are reimbursed by the Government for certain checking and loan losses. For personnel separated, discharged, or retired from the Armed Forces, information as to last known residential or home of record address may be provided to the military banking facility upon certification by a banking facility officer that the facility has a returned or dishonored check negotiated by the individual or the individual has defaulted on a loan and that if restitution is not made by the individual, the U.S. Government will be liable for the losses the facility may incur. K. Routine Use—Disclosure of Information to the General Services Administration A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be disclosed as a routine use to the General Services Administration (GSA) for the purpose of records management inspections conducted under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. L. Routine Use—Disclosure of Information to the National Archives and Records Administration A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM 18NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations disclosed as a routine use to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for the purpose of records management inspections conducted under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. representative. The operator of any vessel in the regulated area must comply with instructions from the Coast Guard or designated representative. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY M. Routine Use—Disclosure to the Merit Systems Protection Board A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be disclosed as a routine use to the Merit Systems Protection Board, including the Office of the Special Counsel, for the purpose of litigation, including administrative proceedings, appeals, special studies of the civil service and other merit systems, review of OPM or Component rules and regulations, investigation of alleged or possible prohibited personnel practices, including administrative proceedings involving any individual subject of a DoD investigation, and such other functions, promulgated in 5 U.S.C. 1205 and 1206 or as may be authorized by law. DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR 100.702, Table 1 to § 100.702, Line 11, will be enforced on December 11, 2021, from 2:30 p.m. through 11:30 p.m. 33 CFR Part 165 If you have questions about this notice of enforcement, call or email Mr. Omar Beceiro, Sector Miami Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard: Telephone: 305–535–4317, Email: Omar.Beceiro@uscg.mil. Safety Zone; Steak Restaurant Fireworks, San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA N. Routine Use—Counterintelligence Purposes A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may be disclosed as a routine use outside the DoD or the U.S. Government for the purpose of counterintelligence activities authorized by U.S. law or Executive order or for the purpose of enforcing laws that protect the national security of the United States. Dated: November 12, 2021. Aaron T. Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2021–25067 Filed 11–17–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100 [Docket No. USCG–2021–0205] Special Local Regulation: Seminole Hard Rock Winterfest Holiday Boat Parade Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of enforcement of regulation. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard will enforce a special local regulation on December 11, 2021, from 2:30 p.m. through 11:30 p.m. to provide for the safety and security of certain navigable waterways during the Seminole Hard Rock Winterfest Holiday Boat Parade. All non-participant persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering, transiting, anchoring, or remaining within the regulated area during the enforcement period unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Miami or a designated SUMMARY: khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES 64369 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Nov 17, 2021 Jkt 256001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Coast Guard will enforce a special local regulation for the Seminole Hard Rock Winterfest Holiday Boat Parade published in 33 CFR 100.702, Table 1 to § 100.702, Line 11 on December 11, 2021, from 2:30 p.m. through 11:30 p.m. This action is being taken to provide for the safety and security of certain navigable waters of the Intracoastal Waterway during this one-day event. Our regulation for marine events within the Seventh Coast Guard District, § 100.702, specifies the location of the special local regulation for the Seminole Hard Rock Winterfest Holiday Boat Parade, which includes a moving buffer zone of 50 yards around the parade as it travels along the New River and Intracoastal Waterway in Ft. Lauderdale, FL. Only event sponsor designated participants and official patrol vessels may enter the regulated area. Spectator vessels may contact the Coast Guard Patrol Commander to request permission to pass through the regulated area. If granted permission, vessels must pass directly through the regulated area at a safe speed without loitering. In addition to this notice of enforcement in the Federal Register. the Coast Guard will inform the public through Local Notice to Mariners and marine information broadcasts at least 24 hours in advance of the enforcement of the special local regulation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: November 11, 2021. J.F. Burdian, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard,Captain of the Port Miami. [FR Doc. 2021–25149 Filed 11–17–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Coast Guard [Docket Number USCG–2021–0813] RIN 1625–AA00 Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the navigable waters of the San Francisco Bay near Rincon Point in San Francisco in support of a fireworks display on December 18, 2021. The safety zone is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone without the permission of the Captain of the Port San Francisco or a designated representative. SUMMARY: This rule is effective from 9 a.m. on December 18, 2021, until 12:45 a.m. on December 19, 2021. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021– 0813 in the search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’ DATES: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant Anthony I. Solares, U.S. Coast Guard District 11, Sector San Francisco, at 415–399–3585, SFWaterways@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM 18NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 220 (Thursday, November 18, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64367-64369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25067]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 310

[Docket ID: DoD-2021-OS-0088]
RIN 0790-AL42


Protection of Privacy and Access to and Amendment of Individual 
Records Under the Privacy Act of 1974; Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making a technical amendment to reinstate an appendix 
to its Privacy Program regulation that was erroneously deleted when the 
regulation was previously revised. The appendix contained a list of 
blanket routine uses that are included by reference in many DoD Privacy 
Act systems of records notices (SORNs).

DATES: This rule is effective November 18, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lyn Kirby, [email protected]; 
(703) 571-0070.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends 32 CFR part 310, 
``Protection of Privacy and Access to and Amendment of Individual 
Records under the Privacy Act of 1974,'' to reinstate DoD's blanket 
routine uses. The appendix which enumerated DoD's blanket routine uses 
was erroneously removed when 32 CFR part 310 was revised on April 11, 
2019 (84 FR 14728-14811).
    A ``routine use'' is defined in the Privacy Act as ``with respect 
to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose 
which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected.'' See 
5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(7). Routine uses are included in individual agency 
SORNs to allow the agency to disclose records from a particular system 
of records to individuals or entities in accordance with the terms of 
the routine use. Some agencies have established a set of routine uses 
that apply to a wide array of published agency SORNs, sometimes 
referred to as blanket routine uses. Their purpose is to provide 
consistent information sharing authority across the SORNs for common or 
non-controversial purposes. Examples of routine uses that are typically 
included in blanket routine uses are ones that allow agencies to share 
information with members of Congress inquiring on behalf of a 
constituent, with the Department of Justice when litigation arises, and 
with agency contractors for purposes outlined in the contract.
    DoD had previously published a list of 14 blanket routine uses in 
an appendix to a prior publication of the DoD Privacy Program 
regulation on April 13, 2007 (72 FR 18758). In the 2019 update, all 
appendices to the prior regulation were removed; however, the appendix 
containing the DoD blanket routine uses (appendix C) should have 
remained because numerous DoD SORNs refer to and incorporate the 
blanket routine uses to support necessary information sharing. This 
technical amendment seeks to remedy this error by restoring the blanket 
routine uses as appendix A to part 310. This will provide clear public 
notice of the existence and ongoing use of the blanket routine uses at 
DoD. A list of DoD's blanket routine uses has also continued to be 
available on the DoD Privacy Program website since the DoD Privacy 
Program regulation was published in 2019.

Regulatory Analysis

Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive 
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive 
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. It has been determined that this rule is not a significant 
regulatory action.

Congressional Review Act

    This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''

    It has been determined that this rule does not involve a Federal 
mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of

[[Page 64368]]

$100 million or more and that it will not significantly or uniquely 
affect small governments.

Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)

    The Director of Administration and Management certified that this 
rule does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities because it is concerned only with the 
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the DoD.

Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)

    It has been determined that this rule does not impose information 
collection or record keeping requirements on the public under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''

    It has been determined that this rule does not have federalism 
implications. This rule does not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government.

Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments''

    It has been determined that this rule does not have a substantial 
effect on Indian tribal governments. This rule does not impose 
substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian tribes, 
preempt tribal law, or effect the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310

    Privacy.

    Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is amended as follows:

PART 310--PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT OF 
INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974

0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 552a.

0
2. Appendix A is added to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 310--DOD Blanket Routine Uses

A. Routine Use--Law Enforcement

    If a system of records maintained by a DoD Component to carry 
out its functions indicates a violation or potential violation of 
law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, and whether 
arising by general statute or by regulation, rule, or order issued 
pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the system of records may 
be referred, as a routine use, to the agency concerned, whether 
Federal, State, local, or foreign, charged with the responsibility 
of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with 
enforcing or implementing the statute, rule, regulation, or order 
issued pursuant thereto.

B. Routine Use--Disclosure When Requesting Information

    A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may 
be disclosed as a routine use to a Federal, State, or local agency 
maintaining civil, criminal, or other relevant enforcement 
information or other pertinent information, such as current 
licenses, if necessary to obtain information relevant to a Component 
decision concerning the hiring or retention of an employee, the 
issuance of a security clearance, the letting of a contract, or the 
issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit.

C. Routine Use--Disclosure of Requested Information

    A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may 
be disclosed to a Federal agency, in response to its request, in 
connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance 
of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an 
employee, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, 
grant, or other benefit by the requesting agency, to the extent that 
the information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency's 
decision on the matter.

D. Routine Use--Congressional Inquiries

    Disclosure from a system of records maintained by a Component 
may be made to a congressional office from the record of an 
individual in response to an inquiry from the congressional office 
made at the request of that individual.

E. Routine Use--Private Relief Legislation

    Relevant information contained in all systems of records of the 
Department of Defense published on or before August 22, 1975, may be 
disclosed to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in connection 
with the review of private relief legislation as set forth in OMB 
Circular A-19 at any stage of the legislative coordination and 
clearance process as set forth in that circular.

F. Routine Use--Disclosures Required by International Agreements

    A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may 
be disclosed to foreign law enforcement, security, investigatory, or 
administrative authorities to comply with requirements imposed by, 
or to claim rights conferred in, international agreements and 
arrangements, including those regulating the stationing and status 
in foreign countries of Department of Defense military and civilian 
personnel.

G. Routine Use--Disclosure to State and Local Taxing Authorities

    Any information normally contained in Internal Revenue Service 
(IRS) Form W-2 which is maintained in a record from a system of 
records maintained by a Component may be disclosed to State and 
local taxing authorities with which the Secretary of the Treasury 
has entered into agreements under 5 U.S.C., sections 5516, 5517, 
5520, and only to those State and local taxing authorities for which 
an employee or military member is or was subject to tax regardless 
of whether tax is or was withheld. This routine use is in accordance 
with Treasury Fiscal Requirements Manual Bulletin No. 76-07.

H. Routine Use--Disclosure to the Office of Personnel Management

    A record from a system of records subject to the Privacy Act and 
maintained by a Component may be disclosed to the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) concerning information on pay and leave, 
benefits, retirement reductions, and any other information necessary 
for the OPM to carry out its legally authorized government-wide 
personnel management functions and studies.

I. Routine Use--Disclosure to the Department of Justice for Litigation

    A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may 
be disclosed as a routine use to any component of the Department of 
Justice for the purpose of representing the Department of Defense, 
or any officer, employee or member of the Department in pending or 
potential litigation to which the record is pertinent.

J. Routine Use--Disclosure to Military Banking Facilities

    Information as to current military addresses and assignments may 
be provided to military banking facilities who provide banking 
services overseas and who are reimbursed by the Government for 
certain checking and loan losses. For personnel separated, 
discharged, or retired from the Armed Forces, information as to last 
known residential or home of record address may be provided to the 
military banking facility upon certification by a banking facility 
officer that the facility has a returned or dishonored check 
negotiated by the individual or the individual has defaulted on a 
loan and that if restitution is not made by the individual, the U.S. 
Government will be liable for the losses the facility may incur.

K. Routine Use--Disclosure of Information to the General Services 
Administration

    A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may 
be disclosed as a routine use to the General Services Administration 
(GSA) for the purpose of records management inspections conducted 
under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.

L. Routine Use--Disclosure of Information to the National Archives and 
Records Administration

    A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may 
be

[[Page 64369]]

disclosed as a routine use to the National Archives and Records 
Administration (NARA) for the purpose of records management 
inspections conducted under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.

M. Routine Use--Disclosure to the Merit Systems Protection Board

    A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may 
be disclosed as a routine use to the Merit Systems Protection Board, 
including the Office of the Special Counsel, for the purpose of 
litigation, including administrative proceedings, appeals, special 
studies of the civil service and other merit systems, review of OPM 
or Component rules and regulations, investigation of alleged or 
possible prohibited personnel practices, including administrative 
proceedings involving any individual subject of a DoD investigation, 
and such other functions, promulgated in 5 U.S.C. 1205 and 1206 or 
as may be authorized by law.

N. Routine Use--Counterintelligence Purposes

    A record from a system of records maintained by a Component may 
be disclosed as a routine use outside the DoD or the U.S. Government 
for the purpose of counterintelligence activities authorized by U.S. 
law or Executive order or for the purpose of enforcing laws that 
protect the national security of the United States.

    Dated: November 12, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-25067 Filed 11-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.