Changing Position Title of Judgment Officer to Administrative Judge, 64349-64362 [2021-24449]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
The current mandatory standard for
carriages and strollers includes
requirements for marking, labeling, and
instructional literature that constitute a
‘‘collection of information,’’ as defined
in the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA;
44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). While the revised
mandatory standard updates the
provisions for marking, labeling, and
instructional literature regarding
consistency and clarity to be consistent
with other ASTM voluntary standards,
the revised mandatory standard does
not alter these requirements
substantively. The Commission took the
steps required by the PRA for
information collections when it adopted
16 CFR part 1227, including obtaining
approval and a control number. Because
the information collection is unchanged,
the revision does not affect the
information collection requirements or
approval related to the standard.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Environmental Considerations
The Commission’s regulations
provide a categorical exclusion for the
Commission’s rules from any
requirement to prepare an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement where
they ‘‘have little or no potential for
affecting the human environment.’’ 16
CFR 1021.5(c)(2). This rule falls within
the categorical exclusion, so no
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement is
required.
J. Preemption
Section 26(a) of the CPSA provides
that where a consumer product safety
standard is in effect and applies to a
product, no state or political
subdivision of a state may either
establish or continue in effect a
requirement dealing with the same risk
of injury unless the state requirement is
identical to the Federal standard. 15
U.S.C. 2075(a). Section 26(c) of the
CPSA also provides that states or
political subdivisions of states may
apply to CPSC for an exemption from
this preemption under certain
circumstances. Section 104(b) of the
CPSIA deems rules issued under that
provision ‘‘consumer product safety
standards.’’ Therefore, once a rule
issued under section 104 of the CPSIA
takes effect, it will preempt in
accordance with section 26(a) of the
CPSA.
K. Effective Date
Under the procedure set forth in
section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA, when
a voluntary standards organization
revises a standard that the Commission
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
adopted as a mandatory standard, the
revision becomes the CPSC standard
within 180 days of notification to the
Commission, unless the Commission
determines that the revision does not
improve the safety of the product, or the
Commission sets a later date in the
Federal Register. 15 U.S.C.
2056a(b)(4)(B). The Commission is
taking neither of those actions with
respect to the standard for carriages and
strollers. Therefore, ASTM F833–21
automatically will take effect as the new
mandatory standard for carriages and
strollers on February 15, 2022, 180 days
after the Commission received notice of
the revision on August 19, 2021. As a
direct final rule, unless the Commission
receives a significant adverse comment
within 30 days of this notification, the
rule will become effective on February
15, 2022.
L. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (CRA;
5 U.S.C. 801–808) states that before a
rule may take effect, the agency issuing
the rule must submit the rule, and
certain related information, to each
House of Congress and the Comptroller
General. 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1). The CRA
submission must indicate whether the
rule is a ‘‘major rule.’’ The CRA states
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) determines
whether a rule qualifies as a ‘‘major
rule.’’ Pursuant to the CRA, this rule
does not qualify as a ‘‘major rule,’’ as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). To comply
with the CRA, CPSC will submit the
required information to each House of
Congress and the Comptroller General.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1227
Consumer protection, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Infants and
children, Law enforcement, Safety,
Toys.
For the reasons stated above, the
Commission amends title 16 CFR
chapter II as follows:
PART 1227—SAFETY STANDARD FOR
CARRIAGES AND STROLLERS
1. The authority citation for part 1227
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: The Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110–314,
104, 122 Stat. 3016 (August 14, 2008); Pub.
L. 112–28, 125 Stat. 273 (August 12, 2011).
■
2. Revise § 1227.2 to read as follows:
§ 1227.2 Requirements for carriages and
strollers.
Each carriage and stroller shall
comply with all applicable provisions of
ASTM F833–21, Standard Consumer
Safety Performance Specification for
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64349
Carriages and Strollers, approved June
15, 2021. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A read-only
copy of the standard is available for
viewing on the ASTM website at https://
www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/. You
may obtain a copy from ASTM
International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA
19428–2959; phone: (610) 832–9585;
www.astm.org. You may inspect a copy
at the Division of the Secretariat, U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone (301)
504–7479, email: cpsc-os@cpsc.gov, or
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, email fr.inspection@
nara.gov, or go to: www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–25140 Filed 11–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 12
RIN 3038–AF17
Changing Position Title of Judgment
Officer to Administrative Judge
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (Commission or
CFTC) is adopting technical
amendments to its Rules Relating to
Reparations to change the position title
of the Judgment Officer to
Administrative Judge and to incorporate
gender neutral language, where
applicable.
SUMMARY:
Effective November 18, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eugene Smith, Director, Office of
Proceedings, Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, at (202) 418–5395
or esmith@cftc.gov, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street NW,
Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
February 2013, the Commission
amended 17 CFR parts 10 and 12 to
clarify the role and authority of its
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
64350
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Judgment Officers.1 In this rulemaking,
the Commission is adopting technical
amendments to 17 CFR part 12 that
more accurately describe the duties
performed by the adjudicator in
reparations cases and other
administrative proceedings by changing
the title of Judgment Officer to
Administrative Judge. The technical
amendments adopted in this final rule
simplify and improve the language of
the rules by using plain language for the
adjudicator instead of the overly
legalistic term ‘‘Judgment Officer,’’ and
by incorporating gender neutral
language into part 12, where applicable;
thereby, making the rules easier to
understand.
Related Matters
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The amendments to the Commission’s
regulations in this rulemaking do not
establish any new substantive or
legislative rules, but rather are technical
amendments to its Rules Relating to
Reparations to change the position title
of the Judgment Officer to
Administrative Judge and to incorporate
gender neutral language, where
applicable. The amendments to the
Commission’s regulations relate solely
to agency management, organization,
procedure, and practice and provide
technical corrections of a minor and
administrative nature. Therefore, this
rulemaking is excepted from the public
rulemaking provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act.2
Additionally, an agency may issue a
new rule in some circumstances without
publication in the Federal Register of a
notice of proposed rulemaking with an
opportunity for comment if the agency
for ‘‘good cause’’ finds (and incorporates
the finding and a brief statement of the
reasons therefor in the rules issued) that
notice and public procedure thereon are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ 3 As noted
earlier, the amendments to part 12 are
technical edits to improve the language
of the rules and incorporate gender
neutral language. Good cause thus exists
as the final rule implements changes
that affect internal agency management,
organization and procedure that
exempts it from notice and comment
rulemaking. Further, as the revisions to
1 Proceedings Before the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, 78 FR 12933 (Feb. 26, 2013).
2 5 U.S.C. 553(a) and (b)(A). Rulemaking
procedures do not apply, to the extent that there is
involved a matter relating to agency management or
personnel or to public property, loans, grants,
benefits, or contracts or to interpretative rules,
general statements of policy, or rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice.
3 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
the Commission’s regulations in this
rulemaking will not cause any party to
undertake efforts to comply with the
regulations as revised, the Commission
has determined to make this rulemaking
effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.4
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires the Commission to consider
whether the regulations it adopts will
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.5
The Commission is obligated to conduct
a regulatory flexibility analysis for any
rule for which the agency publishes a
general notice of proposed rulemaking
pursuant to section 553(b) of the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other law.6 This rulemaking is excepted
from the public rulemaking provisions
of the Administrative Procedure Act.
Accordingly, the Commission is not
required to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis for this rulemaking.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Commission may not conduct or
sponsor, and a respondent is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information contained in a rulemaking
unless the information collection
displays a currently valid control
number issued by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Paperwork Reduction
Act).7 This final rule does not contain a
collection of information as defined in
the Paperwork Reduction Act and,
therefore, is not subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
D. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Section 15 of the Commodity
Exchange Act, as amended by the
Commodity Futures Modernization Act
of 2000, provides that before
promulgating a regulation under the Act
or issuing an order, the Commission
shall consider the costs and benefits of
the action of the Commission.8 These
rules govern internal agency
organization, procedure, and practice,
and therefore the Commission finds that
none of the considerations enumerated
in section 15(a)(2) of the Commodity
4 Section 553(d) of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(d),
provides, in part, that a rule may not be made
effective less than 30 days before its effective date
except as otherwise provided by the agency for
good cause found and published with the rule.
5 See 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
6 5 U.S.C. 601(2).
7 See 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
8 7 U.S.C. 19(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Exchange Act, as amended, are
applicable to these rules.
E. Congressional Review Act
This final rule is not a rule as defined
in the Congressional Review Act.9
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 12
Administrative practice and
procedure, Consumer protection,
Organization and functions
(Government agencies), Reparations.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission amends 17 CFR
part 12 as set forth below:
PART 12—RULES RELATING TO
REPARATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 12
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2(a)(12), 12a(5), and 18.
■
2. Revise § 12.2 to read as follows:
§ 12.2
Definitions.
For purposes of this part:
Act means the Commodity Exchange
Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 1, et seq.
Administrative Judge means an
employee of the Commission who is
authorized to conduct all reparations
proceedings. In appropriate
circumstances, the functions of an
Administrative Judge may be performed
by an Administrative Law Judge.
Administrative Law Judge means an
administrative law judge appointed
pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
3105.
Commission means the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission.
Commission decisional employee
means an employee or employees of the
Commission who are or may reasonably
be expected to be involved in the
decisionmaking process in any
proceeding, including, but not limited
to: An Administrative Judge; members
of the personal staffs of the
Commissioners, but not the
Commissioners themselves; members of
the staffs of the Administrative Law
Judges, but not an Administrative Law
Judge; members of the staffs of the
Administrative Judges; members of the
Office of the General Counsel; members
of the staff of the Office of Proceedings;
and other Commission employees who
may be assigned to hear or to participate
in the decision of a particular matter.
Complainant means a person who,
individually or jointly with others, has
applied to the Commission for a
reparation award pursuant to section
14(a) of the Act, but shall not include
a cross claimant or any other type of
9 See
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
5 U.S.C. 801 through 808.
18NOR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
third-party claimant. The term
‘‘complainant’’ under this part applies
equally to two or more persons who
have applied jointly for a reparation
award.
Complaint means any document
which constitutes an application for a
reparation award pursuant to section
14(a) of the Act, regardless of whether
it is denominated as such.
Counterclaim means an application
for a reparation award by a respondent
against a complainant which satisfies
the requirements of § 12.19. A
counterclaim does not mean a cross
claim or other type of third party claim.
Director of the Office of Proceedings
means an employee of the Commission
who serves as the administrative head of
that Office, with responsibility and
authority to assure that the rules in this
part are administered in a manner
which will effectuate the purposes of
section 14(b) of the Act. The Director is
authorized to convene meetings of all
personnel in the Office of Proceedings,
including Administrative Judges,
Administrative Law Judges, and the
Judges’ personally assigned law clerks.
The Director shall have the authority to
delegate their duties to administer
§§ 12.15, 12.24, 12.26, and 12.27, and,
shall have the authority to assign and,
if necessary, reassign the duties of, and
set reasonable standards for
performance for, all personnel in the
Office, including the Administrative
Judges, but not including
Administrative Law Judges and their
personally assigned law clerks.
Ex parte communication means an
oral or written communication not on
the public record with respect to which
reasonable prior notice to all parties is
not given, but does not include:
(1) A discussion, after consent has
been obtained from all of the named
parties, between a party and an
Administrative Judge or Administrative
Law Judge, or the staffs of the foregoing,
pertaining solely to the possibility of
settling the case without the need for a
decision;
(2) Requests for status reports,
including questions relating to service
of the complaint, and the registration
status of any persons, on any matter or
proceeding covered by this part; or
(3) Requests made to the Office of
Proceedings or the Office of the General
Counsel for interpretation of this part.
Formal decisional procedure means,
where the amount of total damages
claimed exceeds $30,000, exclusive of
interest and costs, a procedure elected
by the complainant or a respondent
where the parties may be granted an oral
hearing. A formal decisional proceeding
is governed by subpart E of this part.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
Hearing means that part of a
proceeding which involves the
submission of proof, either by oral
presentation or written submission.
Interested person means any party,
and includes any person or agency
permitted limited participation or to
state views in a reparation proceeding,
or other person who might be adversely
affected or aggrieved by the outcome of
a proceeding (including the officers,
agents, employees, associates, affiliates,
attorneys, accountants or other
representatives of such persons), and
any other person having a direct or
indirect pecuniary or other interest in
the outcome of a proceeding.
Office of the General Counsel refers to
the members of the Commission’s staff
who provide assistance to the
Commission in its direct review of any
proceeding conducted pursuant to this
part.
Office of Proceedings means that
Office within the Commission
comprised of the Administrative Law
Judges, Administrative Judges, the
Director of that Office, the Proceedings
Clerk, and members of the staffs of the
foregoing, which administers the rules
in this part, other than the rules in this
part authorizing direct review by the
Commission.
Order means the whole or any part of
a final procedural or substantive
disposition of a reparation proceeding
by the Commission, an Administrative
Law Judge, an Administrative Judge, or
the Proceedings Clerk.
Party means a complainant,
respondent or any other person or
agency named or admitted as a party in
a reparation matter.
Person means any individual,
association, partnership, corporation or
trust.
Pleading means the complaint, the
answer to the complaint, any
supplement or amendment thereto, and
any reply to the foregoing.
Proceeding means a case in which the
pleadings have been forwarded and in
which a procedure has been
commenced pursuant to § 12.26.
Proceedings Clerk means that member
of the Commission’s staff in the Office
of Proceedings who shall maintain the
Commission’s reparation docket, assign
reparation cases to an appropriate
decisionmaking official, and act as
custodian of the records of proceedings.
Punitive damages means damages
awarded (no more than two times the
amount of actual damages) in the case
of any action arising from a willful and
intentional violation in the execution of
an order on the floor of a contract
market. An order does not have to be
actually executed to render a violation
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64351
subject to punitive damages. As a
prerequisite to an award of punitive
damages, a complainant must claim
actual and punitive damages, prove
actual damages, and demonstrate that
punitive damages are appropriate.
Registrant means any person who—
(1) Was registered under the Act at the
time of the alleged violation;
(2) Is subject to reparation
proceedings by virtue of section 4m of
the Commodity Exchange Act,
regardless of whether such person was
ever registered under the Act; or
(3) Is otherwise subject to reparation
proceedings under the Act.
Reparation award means the amount
of monetary damages a party may be
ordered to pay.
Respondent means any person or
persons against whom a complainant
seeks a reparation award pursuant to
section 14(a) of the Act.
Summary decisional procedure
means, where the amount of total
damages claimed does not exceed
$30,000, exclusive of interest and costs,
a procedure elected by the complainant
or the respondent wherein an oral
hearing need not be held and proof in
support of each party’s case may be
supplied in the form and manner
prescribed by § 12.208. A summary
decisional proceeding is governed by
subpart D of this part.
Voluntary decisional procedure
means, regardless of the amount of
damages claimed, a procedure which
the complainant and the respondent
have chosen voluntarily to submit their
claims and counterclaims, allowable
under this part, for an expeditious
resolution by an Administrative Judge.
By electing the voluntary decisional
procedure, parties agree that a decision
issued by an Administrative Judge shall
be without accompanying findings of
fact and shall be final without right of
Commission review or judicial review.
A voluntary decisional proceeding is
governed by subpart C of this part.
■ 3. Amend § 12.5 as follows:
■ a. Revise paragraph (a); and
■ b. Remove the undesignated
paragraph following paragraph (a).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 12.5
Computation of time.
(a) In general. In computing any
period of time prescribed by the rules in
this part or allowed by the Commission,
the Director of the Office of Proceedings,
an Administrative Judge, or an
Administrative Law Judge, the day of
the act, event, or default from which the
designated period of time begins to run
is not to be included. The last day of the
period so computed is to be included
unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
64352
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
legal holiday, in which event the period
runs until the end of the next day which
is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal
holiday. Intermediate Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal holidays shall be
excluded from the computation only
when the period of time prescribed or
allowed is less than seven (7) days.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 12.6, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 12.6 Extensions of time; adjournments;
postponements.
(a) In general. Except as otherwise
provided by law or by the rules in this
part, for good cause shown, the
Commission, or an Administrative
Judge, Administrative Law Judge, or the
Director of the Office of Proceedings,
before whom a matter is then pending,
on their own motion or the motion of a
party, may at any time extend or shorten
the time limit prescribed by the rules in
this part for filing any document. In any
instance in which a time limit is not
prescribed for an action to be taken
concerning any matter, the Commission
or one of the other officials mentioned
above may set a time limit for that
action.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 12.7, republish paragraph (c)
heading and revise paragraph (c)(1) to
read as follows:
§ 12.7 Ex parte communications in
reparation proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Sanctions. (1) Upon receipt of an
ex parte communication knowingly
made or knowingly caused to be made
by a party in violation of the prohibition
contained in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, the Commission,
Administrative Law Judge, or an
Administrative Judge may, to the extent
consistent with the interests of justice
and the policy of the Act, require the
parties to show cause why their claims
or interest in the proceeding should not
be dismissed, denied, disregarded, or
otherwise adversely affected on account
of such violation.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Revise § 12.8 to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 12.8
Separation of functions.
(a) An Administrative Judge, or
Administrative Law Judge, will not be
responsible to or subject to the
supervision or direction of any officer,
employee, or agent of the Commission
engaged in the performance of
investigative or prosecutorial functions
for the Commission.
(b) No officer, employee, or agent of
the Federal Government engaged in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
performance of investigative or
prosecutorial functions in connection
with any proceeding shall, in that
proceeding or a factually related
proceeding, participate or advise in the
decision of an Administrative Judge, or
Administrative Law Judge, except as a
witness in the proceeding, without the
express written consent of the parties to
the proceeding. This paragraph (b) shall
not apply to the Commissioners.
7. In § 12.9, republish paragraph (a)
heading and revise paragraphs (a)(1) and
(b) to read as follows:
■
§ 12.9
Practice before the Commission.
(a) Practice—(1) By non-attorneys.
Individuals may appear pro se (on their
own behalf); a general partner may
represent the partnership; a bona fide
officer of a corporation, trust, or
association may represent the
corporation, trust, or association.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Debarment of counsel or
representative during the course of a
proceeding. (1) Whenever, while a
proceeding is pending before them, an
Administrative Judge or an
Administrative Law Judge finds that a
person acting as counsel or
representative for any party to the
proceeding is guilty of contemptuous
conduct, such official may order that
such person be precluded from further
acting as counsel or representative in
the proceeding. An immediate appeal to
the Commission may be taken from any
such order, pursuant to the provisions
of § 12.309, but the proceeding shall not
be delayed or suspended pending
disposition of the appeal; Provided, that
the official may suspend the
proceedings for a reasonable time for the
purpose of enabling the party to obtain
other counsel or representative.
(2) Whenever the Administrative
Judge or Administrative Law Judge has
issued an order precluding a person
from further acting as counsel or
representative in a proceeding, such
official, within a reasonable time
thereafter, shall submit to the
Commission a report of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the issuance
of the order and shall recommend what
action the Commission should take
respecting the appearance of such
person as counsel or representative in
other proceedings before the
Commission.
*
*
*
*
*
8. In § 12.10, revise paragraphs (b) and
(c) to read as follows:
■
§ 12.10
*
PO 00000
*
Service.
*
Frm 00010
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
(b) Service of orders and decisions. A
copy of all notices, rulings, opinions,
and orders of the Proceedings Clerk, the
Director of the Office of Proceedings, an
Administrative Judge, an Administrative
Law Judge, the General Counsel or any
employee under the General Counsel’s
supervision as the General Counsel may
designate, or the Commission shall be
served by the Proceedings Clerk on each
of the parties. The Commission, in its
discretion and with due consideration
for the convenience of the parties, may
serve the aforementioned documents to
the parties by electronic means.
(c) Designation of person to receive
service. The first page of the first
document filed in a proceeding by a
party or participant shall include the
contact information of a person
authorized to receive service on their
behalf. Thereafter, service of documents
shall be made upon the person
authorized unless service on the party is
ordered by an Administrative Judge, an
Administrative Law Judge or the
Commission, or unless no person
authorized to receive service can be
found, or unless the person authorized
to receive service is changed by the
party upon due notice to all other
parties.
■ 9. In § 12.11, republish paragraph (d)
heading and revise paragraphs (d)(1),
(d)(2) introductory text, and (d)(2)(i) and
(iii) to read as follows:
§ 12.11 Formalities of filing of documents
with the Proceedings Clerk.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Signature—(1) Manner. The
original of all papers must be signed in
ink by persons filing the same or by
their duly authorized agents or
attorneys.
(2) Effect. The signature on any
document of persons acting either for
themselves or as attorney or agent for
another constitutes certification by them
that:
(i) They have read the document and
know the contents thereof;
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) To the best of their knowledge,
information and belief, every statement
contained in the document is true and
not misleading; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 12.12, revise paragraphs (b)
introductory text and (b)(1) and (3) to
read as follows:
§ 12.12
Signature.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Effect. The signature on any
document of any persons acting either
for themselves or as attorney or agent for
another constitutes certification by them
that:
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(1) They have read the document
subscribed and know the contents
thereof;
*
*
*
*
*
(3) To the best of their knowledge,
information, and belief, every statement
contained in the document is true and
not misleading; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. In § 12.13, revise paragraph (b)(2)
to read as follows:
§ 12.13
Complaint; election of procedure.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Subscription and verification of
the complaint. Each complaint shall be
signed personally by an individual
complainant or by a duly authorized
officer or agent of a complainant who is
not a natural person. Complainant’s
signature shall be given under oath or
affirmation under penalty of law
attesting either that complainant knows
the facts set forth in the complaint to be
true, or believes the facts set forth to be
true, in which event the information
upon which complainant formed that
belief shall be set forth with
particularity.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Revise § 12.14 to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 12.14
Withdrawal of complaint.
At any time prior to service of
notification to the complainant pursuant
to § 12.15(a) of the Director of the Office
of Proceedings’ determination to
forward the complaint to a registrant,
complainant may file a written notice of
withdrawal of the complaint which
shall terminate the Commission’s
consideration of the complaint without
prejudice to complainant’s right to refile a reparations complaint based upon
the same set of facts within two years
after the cause of action accrues. If the
complainant has previously filed a
notice of withdrawal of a complaint
based upon the same set of facts, the
notice of withdrawal of complaint shall
terminate the case with prejudice to
complainant’s rights to re-file a
complaint in reparations based on the
same set of facts, but such termination
shall be regarded by the Commission as
without prejudice to complainant’s right
to seek redress in such alternative
forums as may be available for
adjudication of the claims.
■ 13. In § 12.15, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 12.15
Notification of complaint.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Determination not to forward
complaint. The Director may, in their
discretion, refuse to forward a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
64353
complaint as to a particular respondent
if it appears that the matters alleged
therein are not cognizable in
reparations, or that grounds exist
pursuant to § 12.24(c) or (d) for refusing
to forward the complaint. If the Director
of the Office of Proceedings should
determine not to forward the complaint
to all registrants named in the complaint
in accordance with this section, no
proceeding shall be held thereon and
the complainant shall be notified to that
effect. If the Director determines to
forward the complaint as to less than all
of the registrants, the complainant shall
be so notified. A termination of the
complaint as to any registrant shall be
regarded by the Commission as without
prejudice to the right of the complainant
to seek such alternative forms of relief
as may be available.
■ 14. Revise § 12.17 to read as follows:
penalty of law, attesting that the signer
has read the answer; that to the best of
the signer’s knowledge all of the
statements in the answer, the
counterclaim (if any), and the materials
required by this part to be appended
thereto, are accurate and true, and that
the answer (and counterclaim, if any)
has not been interposed for delay.
(d) Affidavit of service. The registrant
shall file with the answer an affidavit
showing that a true copy of the answer
has been served upon the complainant,
either personally or by first-class mail
addressed to the complainant at the
address set forth in the complaint.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. In § 12.20, revise paragraphs (a)
and (c) to read as follows:
§ 12.17
(a) Response to counterclaim. If an
answer asserts a counterclaim, the
complainant shall, within thirty (30)
days after service of the answer by the
respondent:
(1) Satisfy the counterclaim as if it
were a complaint, in the manner
prescribed by § 12.17; or
(2) File a reply to the counterclaim
with the Commission.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Election of decisional procedure. If
neither the complainant nor the
respondent, in the complaint or answer
respectively, has previously made an
election of the summary decisional
procedure or the formal decisional
procedure, the complainant may make
such an election in the reply.
■ 17. In § 12.21, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
Satisfaction of complaint.
A respondent may satisfy the
complaint:
(a) By paying to the complainant
either the amount to which the
complainant claims to be entitled as set
forth in the complaint or such other
amount as the complainant will accept
in satisfaction of the claim; and
(b) By submitting to the Commission
notice of satisfaction and withdrawal of
the complaint, duly executed by the
complainant and the respondent.
■ 15. In § 12.18, revise paragraphs (b),
(c), and (d) to read as follows:
§ 12.18
Answer; election of procedure.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Motion for reconsideration of
determination to forward the complaint.
An answer may include a motion for
reconsideration of the determination to
forward the complaint, specifying the
grounds therefor, which the Director of
the Office of Proceedings, in their
discretion, may grant by terminating the
case pursuant to § 12.27, or deny by
forwarding the pleadings and matters of
record for an elected decisional
proceeding pursuant to § 12.26. The
inclusion in an answer of a motion for
reconsideration shall not preclude a
respondent, if the motion is denied,
from moving for dismissal at a later
stage of the proceeding for the same
reasons cited in a motion for
reconsideration pursuant to this
paragraph (b).
(c) Subscription and verification of
the answer. An answer shall be signed
personally by each registrant on behalf
of whom it is filed or by a duly
authorized officer or agent of any such
registrant who is not a natural person.
Each registrant’s signature shall be given
under oath, or by affirmation under
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 12.20 Response to counterclaim; reply;
election of procedure.
§ 12.21
Voluntary dismissal.
(a) At any time after the Director of
the Office of Proceedings has served
notification to the parties pursuant to
§ 12.15 of the Director’s determination
to forward the complaint to the
respondent for a response, either the
complainant or the respondent may
obtain dismissal of the complaint (or the
proceeding, if one has commenced) by
filing a stipulation of dismissal, duly
executed by all of the complainants and
each respondent against whom the
complaint has been forwarded (or added
as a party in the course of a proceeding);
provided however, that if the stipulation
is filed after any respondent has filed an
answer, the terms of the stipulation
shall include a dismissal of any
counterclaims in the answer.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. In § 12.22, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
64354
§ 12.22
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Default proceedings.
§ 12.24
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Default procedure. Upon a party’s
failure to respond timely to a complaint
or counterclaim as prescribed in
§§ 12.16 and 12.20, or timely to comply
with § 12.25(b) or (c), the Director of the
Office of Proceedings shall forward the
pleadings, and other materials then of
record, to an Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge who may
thereafter enter findings and
conclusions concerning the questions of
violations and damages and, if
warranted, enter a reparation award
against the non-responding party. If the
facts which are treated as admitted are
considered insufficient to support a
violation or the amount of reparations
sought, the Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge may order
production of supplementary evidence
from the party not in default and may
enter a default order and an award
based thereon.
*
*
*
*
*
19. In § 12.23, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
§ 12.23
Setting aside of default.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Default order final. A default order
that has become final pursuant to
§ 12.22(c) shall not be set aside except
upon a motion filed and served by the
defaulted party showing that the
defaulted party should be relieved from
the default order because of fraud
perpetrated on a decisionmaking official
or the Commission, mistake, excusable
neglect, or because the order is void for
want of jurisdiction. Such a motion
shall also show that, if the default order
were set aside, there would be a
reasonable likelihood of success for the
defaulted party’s claim or defense on
the merits and that no party would be
prejudiced thereby. Motions to set aside
a final default order for fraud, mistake,
or excusable neglect shall be filed
within one year after the order was
issued. All motions to set aside default
orders shall be decided, in the first
instance, by the official who issued the
order. A denial of a motion to set aside
a default order that has become final
shall be treated as an initial decision,
which may be appealed to the
Commission in accordance with the
requirements of § 12.401. A grant of a
motion to set aside a final default order
shall be treated as a nonfinal order
which may be appealed only in
accordance with the requirements of
§ 12.309.
20. In § 12.24, revise paragraphs
(a)(1)(iii) and (e) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
Parallel proceedings.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Is governed by a compulsory
counterclaim rule of Federal court
procedure which required the
complainant in reparations to assert all
of complainant’s claims (including
those based on alleged violations of the
Commodity Exchange Act, and any
regulation or order issued thereunder)
as counterclaims in that proceeding;
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Exceptions. At the time notice of
a parallel proceeding is filed pursuant to
paragraph (b) of this section, or any time
thereafter, any party, or the receiver or
trustee, may file and serve upon other
parties a statement in support of or in
opposition to any action taken or to be
taken pursuant to paragraph (c) or (d) of
this section. This statement shall be
addressed to the Office of Proceedings,
attention of the Proceedings Clerk. Upon
receipt of any such statement, the
Proceedings Clerk shall immediately
forward the statement to the official
with responsibility over the case. The
notice and the statements filed by the
parties shall be reviewed by that official
who, on or before the effective date of
action taken pursuant to paragraphs
(c)(1) and (2) and (d)(1) and (2) of this
section, may take such actions as, in the
official’s opinion, are necessary to
ensure that the parties to the matter or
proceedings are not unduly prejudiced.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. In § 12.25, revise paragraphs (b)
and (c) to read as follows:
§ 12.25
Filing fees.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Fees payable upon filing an
answer. (1) If a complainant, in the
complaint, has elected the voluntary
decisional procedure, a respondent
who, in the answer, elects the summary
decisional procedure (available only
where the amount of damages claimed
in the complaint or as counterclaims
does not exceed $30,000) shall, at the
time of filing the answer, pay a filing fee
of $75.00.
(2) If a complainant, in the complaint,
has elected the voluntary decisional
procedure, a respondent who, in the
answer, elects the formal decisional
procedure (available only where the
amount of damages claimed in the
complaint or as counterclaims exceeds
$30,000) shall, at the time of filing the
answer, pay a filing fee of $200.00.
(c) Fees payable upon filing a reply.
In any case in which a counterclaim has
been made, unless a complainant in the
complaint, or the respondent in an
answer, has elected the summary
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
decisional procedure or the formal
decisional procedure a complainant,
who in the reply elects either of these
procedures, shall, at the time of filing
the reply, pay a filing fee of $75.00 or
$200.00, respectively, depending
whether the procedure elected by
complainant is pursuant to subpart D or
E of this part.
■ 22. Revise § 12.26 to read as follows:
§ 12.26 Commencement of a reparation
proceeding.
(a) Commencement of voluntary
decisional proceeding. Where
complainant and respondent in the
complaint and answer have elected the
voluntary decisional procedure
pursuant to subpart C of this part and
the complainant has paid the filing fee
required by § 12.25, the Director of the
Office of Proceedings shall, if in the
Director’s opinion the facts warrant
taking such action, forward the
pleadings and all materials of record to
the Proceedings Clerk for a proceeding
to be conducted in accordance with
subpart C of this part. The Proceedings
Clerk shall forthwith notify the parties
of such action. Such notification shall
be accompanied by an order issued by
the Proceedings Clerk requiring the
parties to complete all discovery, as
provided in subpart B of this part,
within 50 days thereafter. A voluntary
decisional proceeding commences upon
service of such notification and order.
As soon as practicable after service of
such notification, the Proceedings Clerk
shall assign the case to an
Administrative Judge for a final
decision.
(b) Commencement of summary
decisional proceeding. Where the
amount claimed as damages, exclusive
of interest and costs, in the complaint or
in counterclaim does not exceed
$30,000, and either a complainant or a
respondent in the complaint, answer, or
reply, has elected the summary
decisional procedure pursuant to
subpart D of this part, and has paid the
filing fee required by § 12.25, the
Director of the Office of Proceedings
shall, if in the Director’s opinion the
facts warrant taking such action,
forward the pleadings and all materials
of record to the Proceedings Clerk for a
proceeding to be conducted in
accordance with subpart D of this part.
The Proceedings Clerk shall forthwith
notify the parties of such action. Such
notification shall be accompanied by an
order issued by the Proceedings Clerk
requiring the parties to complete all
discovery, as provided in subpart B of
this part, within 50 days thereafter. A
summary decisional proceeding
commences upon service of such
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
notification. As soon as practicable after
service of such notification, the
Proceedings Clerk shall assign the case
to an Administrative Judge for
disposition.
(c) Commencement of formal
decisional proceeding. Where the
amount claimed as damages in the
complaint or as counterclaims exceeds
$30,000, exclusive of interest and costs,
and either a complainant or a
respondent in the complaint, answer or
reply, has elected the formal decisional
procedure pursuant to subpart E of this
part, and has paid the filing fee required
by § 12.25, the Director of the Office of
Proceedings shall, if in the Director’s
opinion the facts warrant taking such
action, forward the pleadings and the
materials of record to the Proceedings
Clerk for a proceeding to be conducted
in accordance with subpart E of this
part. The Proceedings Clerk shall
forthwith notify the parties of such
action. Such notification shall be
accompanied by an order issued by the
Proceedings Clerk requiring the parties
to complete all discovery, as provided
in subpart B of this part, within 50 days
thereafter. A formal decisional
proceeding commences upon service of
such notification and order. As soon as
practicable after service of such
notification, the Proceedings Clerk shall
assign the case to an Administrative
Judge. All provisions of this part that
refer to and grant authority to or impose
obligations upon an Administrative Law
Judge shall be read as referring to and
granting authority to and imposing
obligations upon the Administrative
Judge.
■ 23. In § 12.30, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§ 12.30
Methods of discovery.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Sanctions for abuse of discovery. If
an Administrative Law Judge or an
Administrative Judge finds that any
party, without substantial justification,
has necessitated the filing of a motion
for a protective order or for an order
compelling discovery, or any other
discovery-related motions, that party
shall, if the motion is granted, be
ordered to pay, at the termination of the
proceeding, the reasonable expenses of
the moving party incurred in filing the
motion, unless the decisionmaking
official finds that circumstances exist
which would make an award of such
expenses unjust. If a decisionmaking
official finds that any party, without
substantial justification, has filed a
motion for a protective order or for an
order compelling discovery, or any
discovery-related motions, that party
shall, if the motion is denied, be ordered
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
64355
to pay, at the termination of the
proceeding, the reasonable expenses of
an adverse party incurred in opposing
the motion, unless the decisionmaker
finds that circumstances exist which
would make an award of such expenses
unjust.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 24. In § 12.33, revise paragraphs (b),
(c), and (d) to read as follows:
discovery or decisionmaking official
may permit withdrawal or amendment
when the presentation of the merits of
the proceeding will be served thereby
and the party who obtains the
admission fails to satisfy such official
that withdrawal or amendments will
prejudice them in maintaining an action
or defense on the merits.
■ 25. Revise § 12.34 to read as follows:
§ 12.33
§ 12.34 Discovery by a decisionmaking
official.
Admissions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Reply. Each matter of which an
admission is requested shall be
separately set forth. The matter is
admitted unless within twenty (20) days
after service of the request, the party
upon whom the request is directed files
and serves upon the party requesting a
verified written answer or objection to
the matter. If objection is made, the
reasons therefor shall be stated. The
answer shall specifically deny the
matter or set forth in detail the reasons
why the answering party cannot
truthfully admit or deny the matter. A
denial shall fairly meet the substance of
the requested admission and when good
faith requires that an answering party
qualify the answer and deny only a part
of the matter of which an admission is
requested, the answering party shall
specify so much of it as is true and
qualify or deny the remainder.
Answering parties may not give a lack
of information or knowledge as a reason
for failure to admit or deny unless they
state that they have made reasonable
inquiry and that the information known
or reasonably available to them is
insufficient to enable them to admit or
deny. Parties who consider that a matter
of which an admission has been
requested presents a genuine issue for
trial may not, on that ground alone,
object to the request; they may deny the
matter or set forth reasons why they
cannot admit or deny it.
(c) Determining sufficiency of answers
or objections. The party who has
requested the admissions may move to
determine the sufficiency of the answers
or objections. Unless the objecting party
sustains the burden of showing that the
objection is justified, the official
presiding over discovery shall order that
an answer be served. If such official
determines that an answer does not
comply with the requirements of this
section, that official may order either
that the matter is admitted or that an
amended answer be served.
(d) Effect of admission. Any matter
admitted under this section is
conclusively established and may be
used as proof against the party who
made the admission. However, the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(a) Applicability. The provisions of
this section shall apply to all decisional
proceedings commenced pursuant to
§ 12.26. For the purposes of this section,
the term ‘‘decisionmaking official’’ shall
mean an Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge assigned to
render a decision in the proceeding.
(b) Production of documents and
tangible things—(1) Order for
production. A decisionmaking official
may, upon the official’s own motion,
order a party or non-party to produce
copies of specifically designated
documents, papers, books, accounts, or
tangible things (or categories of any of
the foregoing) which are in the
possession, custody or control of the
party, non-party or agent thereof, against
whom the order is directed. Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, a party or nonparty ordered to
produce documents or any of the items
under this paragraph (b)(1) shall file and
serve the documents and items listed in
the order within twenty (20) days from
the date of service of the order, or
within such period of time as the
decisionmaking official may direct. The
decisionmaking official may issue
subpoenas to compel the production by
parties or non-parties of such
documents and tangible things as are
described in this section.
(2) Trade secrets, commercially
sensitive or confidential information. If
any party or person against whom an
order to produce has been directed
acting in good faith has reason to
believe that any documents or other
tangible thing ordered to be produced
contains a trade secret, or commercially
sensitive or other confidential
information, the party or person may, in
lieu of serving any such document, in
accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, file and serve a written request
for confidential treatment of such
documents. Any such request for
confidential treatment shall be
accompanied by a verified statement
identifying with particularity the
information on those documents
considered to be trade secrets,
commercially sensitive or confidential
information, with reasons therefor, and
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
64356
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
indicating which portions, if any, of
those documents may be served on
other parties without disclosure of such
information. Upon considering a request
for confidential treatment in accordance
with this paragraph (b)(2), the
decisionmaking official may, if upon a
finding that the information identified
in the request warrants confidential
treatment and is not probative of any
material fact in controversy, make
copies of the documents produced,
delete such information from the copies,
and serve the copies as modified upon
the other parties, with or without an
appropriate protective order limiting
dissemination to the parties and their
counsel, if any.
(3) Inability to produce. Any party or
person who cannot produce documents
or other tangible things called for in an
order for production, because those
documents or things are not in their
possession, custody, or control, shall
file and serve within the time provided
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section a
verified statement identifying the
documents which cannot be produced
and setting forth with particularity the
reasons for non-production.
(c) Order for written testimony. The
decisionmaking official may, upon the
official’s own motion, order a party or
non-party witness to submit verified
statements or written responses to
interrogatories, or both, as to all relevant
matters within the party’s personal
knowledge which are required in
response to the order. A party or person
ordered to file affidavits and/or verified
written responses to interrogatories
shall file and serve the documents
within such period of time as the
decisionmaking official may direct. The
official may issue subpoenas to compel
the filing by parties or non-parties of
such verified statements and written
responses as are described in this
paragraph (c).
26. In § 12.35, revise the introductory
text to read as follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 12.35 Consequence of a party’s failure to
comply with a discovery order.
If a party fails to comply with an
order compelling discovery, or an order
issued pursuant to § 12.34, the official
assigned to render the decision in the
case may, upon motion by a party or on
the official’s own motion, take such
action in regard thereto as is just,
including but not limited to the
following:
*
*
*
*
*
27. In § 12.101, revise the section
heading and the introductory text to
read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
§ 12.101 Functions and responsibilities of
the Administrative Judge.
The Administrative Judge shall be
responsible for the fair and orderly
conduct of the proceeding and shall
have the authority:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 28. Revise § 12.102 to read as follows:
§ 12.102
Judge.
Disqualification of Administrative
(a) At their own request. An
Administrative Judge may withdraw
from a voluntary decisional proceeding
when they consider themselves to be
disqualified on the grounds of personal
bias, conflict of interest, or similar
bases. In such event the Administrative
Judge shall immediately notify the
Commission and each of the parties of
the withdrawal and of the basis for such
action.
(b) Upon the request of a party. Any
party may request an Administrative
Judge to disqualify themselves on the
grounds of personal bias, conflict of
interest, or similar bases. Interlocutory
review of an adverse ruling by the
Administrative Judge may be sought
without certification of the matter by the
Administrative Judge only in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in § 12.309.
■ 29. In § 12.106, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 12.106
Final decision and order.
(a) When a final decision is required.
After all submissions of proof have been
received, the Administrative Judge shall
make the final decision. Upon its
issuance, the final decision shall
forthwith be filed with the Proceedings
Clerk, and immediately served on the
parties. The Proceedings Clerk shall also
serve a notice, to accompany the final
decision, of the effect of a failure by a
party ordered to pay a reparation award
to file the documents required by
§ 12.407(c).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 30. Revise § 12.200 to read as follows:
§ 12.200 Scope and applicability of this
subpart.
The rules set forth in this subpart are
applicable only to proceedings
forwarded pursuant to § 12.26(b). The
rules in subpart B of this part permitting
discovery are applicable in a summary
decisional proceeding. Unless
specifically made applicable, the rules
prescribed in subparts C and E of this
part shall not apply to such
proceedings. Parties to a proceeding
forwarded pursuant to § 12.26(b) may,
by signed agreement filed at any time
prior to the issuance of the initial
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
decision, or of any other order disposing
of all issues in the proceeding, elect to
have all of the issues in the proceeding
decided pursuant to the voluntary
decisional procedure. Upon receiving a
timely filed stipulation signed by all
parties evidencing such an election, the
Administrative Judge shall conduct the
proceeding and render a decision
pursuant to subpart C of this part.
■ 31. In § 12.201, revise the section
heading, the introductory text, and
paragraphs (a) and (d) to read as follows:
§ 12.201 Functions and responsibilities of
the Administrative Judge.
The Administrative Judge shall be
responsible for the fair and orderly
conduct of the proceeding and shall
have the authority—
(a) In the Administrative Judge’s
discretion, to conduct pre-decision
conferences in accordance with
§ 12.206;
*
*
*
*
*
(d) To take such action as is
appropriate under § 12.35, if a party
fails to comply with an order issued by
the Administrative Judge pursuant to
§ 12.34;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 32. Revise § 12.202 to read as follows:
§ 12.202
Judge.
Disqualification of Administrative
(a) At their own request. An
Administrative Judge may withdraw
from a summary decisional proceeding
when they consider themselves to be
disqualified on the grounds of personal
bias, conflict of interest, or similar
bases. In such event, the Administrative
Judge shall immediately notify the
Commission and each of the parties of
the withdrawal and of the basis for such
action.
(b) Upon the request of a party. Any
party may request an Administrative
Judge to disqualify themselves on the
grounds of personal bias, conflict of
interest, or similar bases. Interlocutory
review of an order denying such a
request may be sought without
certification of the matter by the
Administrative Judge only in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in § 12.309.
■ 33. In § 12.204, revise paragraphs (a)
and (b) to read as follows:
§ 12.204 Amended and supplemental
pleadings.
(a) Amendments to pleadings. At any
time before the parties have concluded
their submission of proof, the
Administrative Judge may allow
amendments of the pleadings either
upon written consent of the parties, or
for good cause shown, provided
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
however, that any pleading as amended
shall not contain an allegation of
damages in excess of $30,000. Any party
may file a response to a motion to
amend the pleadings within ten (10)
days after the date of service upon that
party of the motion.
(b) Supplemental pleadings. At any
time before the parties have concluded
their submissions of proof, and upon
such terms as are just, the
Administrative Judge may, upon motion
by a party, permit a party to serve a
supplemental pleading setting forth
transactions, occurrences or events
which have happened since the date of
the pleadings sought to be
supplemented and which are relevant to
any of the issues in the proceeding:
Provided however, that any pleading as
supplemented may not contain an
allegation of damages in excess of
$30,000. Any party may file a response
to a motion to supplement the pleadings
within ten (10) days after the date of
service upon that party of the motion.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 34. In § 12.205, revise paragraphs (a)
and (b), republish the paragraph (c)
heading, and revise paragraphs (c)(1)
and (2) to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 12.205
Motions.
(a) In general. Motions for relief not
otherwise specifically provided for in
this subpart (§§ 12.200 through 12.210),
other than discovery-related motions
and motions for extensions of time and
similar procedural orders, shall not be
allowed. Except as otherwise
specifically provided in this subpart, all
motions permitted under the provisions
of this subpart shall be directed to the
Administrative Judge prior to the filing
of the initial decision, and to the
Commission after the initial decision
has been filed. Motions for extensions of
time and similar procedural orders may
be acted upon at any time, without
awaiting a response thereto. Any party
adversely affected by such action may
request reconsideration, vacation or
modification of such action.
(b) Answer to motions. Any party may
serve and file a written response to a
motion within ten (10) days after service
of the motion, or within such longer or
shorter period as is established by the
provisions of this part, or as the
Administrative Judge or the
Commission may direct.
(c) Dismissal—(1) By the
Administrative Judge. An
Administrative Judge, acting upon their
own motion, may:
(i) Dismiss the entire proceeding
without prejudice to counterclaims, if
the Administrative Judge finds that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
matters alleged in the complaint fail to
state a claim cognizable in reparations;
or
(ii) Order dismissal of any claim,
counterclaim, or party from the
proceeding if the Administrative Judge
finds, after review of the record, that
such claim or counterclaim (by itself or
as applied to any party) is not
cognizable in reparations.
(2) Motion for dismissal by a party.
Any party who believes that grounds
exist for dismissal of the entire
complaint, or of any claim therein, or of
any counterclaim or party from the
proceeding, may file a motion for
dismissal specifying the claims or
parties to be dismissed and the reasons
therefor. Upon consideration of the
whole record, the Administrative Judge
may grant or deny such motion, in
whole or in part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 35. Amend § 12.206 as follows:
■ a. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through
(g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through (7);
■ b. Designate the introductory text as
paragraph (a) introductory text;
■ c. Revise newly designated paragraph
(a) introductory text;
■ d. Designate the undesignated
paragraph following newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(7) as paragraph (b); and
■ e. Revise newly designated paragraph
(b).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 12.206
Pre-decision conferences.
(a) At any time after a summary
decisional proceeding has been
commenced pursuant to § 12.26(b), the
Administrative Judge may, in their
discretion, conduct one or more predecision conferences to be held in
Washington, DC, or by telephone, with
all parties, for the purposes of:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) At or following the conclusion of
such a conference, the Administrative
Judge may serve a pre-decision
memorandum and order setting forth
the agreements, if any, reached by the
parties, any procedural determinations
made by the Administrative Judge, and
the issues for resolution not disposed of
by the admissions or agreements by the
parties. Such order, when issued, shall
control the subsequent course of the
proceeding unless modified to prevent
injustice.
■ 36. In § 12.207, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), (c), and (d) to read as follows:
§ 12.207
Summary disposition.
(a) Filing of motions, answers. Any
parties who believe that there is no
genuine issue of material fact to be
determined and that they are entitled to
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64357
a decision as a matter of law concerning
all issues of liability in the proceeding
may file a motion for summary
disposition at any time until the parties
have concluded their submissions of
proof. Any adverse party, within ten
(10) days after service of the motion,
may file and serve opposing papers or
may countermove for summary
disposition.
(b) Supporting papers. A motion for
summary disposition shall include a
statement of the material facts as to
which the moving party contends there
is no genuine issue, supported by the
pleadings, and by affidavits, other
verified statements, admissions,
stipulations, and interrogatories. The
motion may also be supported by briefs
containing points and authorities in
support of the contention of the party
making the motion. When a motion is
made and supported as provided in this
section, unless otherwise ordered by the
Administrative Judge, adverse parties
may not rest upon the mere allegations,
but shall serve and file in response a
statement setting forth those material
facts as to which they contend a genuine
issue exists, supported by affidavits and
other verified material. They may also
submit a brief of points and authorities.
(c) Summary disposition upon motion
of the Administrative Judge. If the
Administrative Judge believes that there
may be no genuine issue of material fact
to be determined and that one of the
parties may be entitled to a decision as
a matter of law, the Administrative
Judge may direct the parties to submit
papers in support of and in opposition
to summary disposition, substantially as
provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section.
(d) Ruling on summary disposition.
The Administrative Judge may grant
summary disposition if the undisputed
pleaded facts, affidavits, other verified
statements, admissions, stipulations,
and matters of official notice show that:
(1) There is no genuine issue as to any
material fact;
(2) There is no necessity that further
facts be developed in the record; and
(3) A party is entitled to a decision in
that party’s favor as a matter of law.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 37. In § 12.208, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 12.208
Submissions of proof.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Oral testimony and examination.
The Administrative Judge may order an
oral hearing for the presentation of
testimony and examination of the
parties and their witnesses when
appropriate and necessary for the
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
64358
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
resolution of factual issues, upon
motion by either a party or the
Administrative Judge. An oral hearing
held under this section will be
convened by conference telephone call
as provided in § 12.209(b), except that
an in-person hearing may be held in
Washington, DC, under the
circumstances set forth in § 12.209(c).
■ 38. Revise § 12.209 to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 12.209
Oral testimony.
(a) Generally. When the
Administrative Judge determines that an
oral hearing is necessary and
appropriate, such oral hearing will be
held either by telephone or in person in
Washington, DC, as set forth in
paragraphs (b) through (d) of this
section. The Administrative Judge, in
their discretion with consideration for
the convenience of the parties and their
witnesses, will determine the time and
date of such hearing. During an oral
hearing, in their discretion, the
Administrative Judge may regulate
appropriately the course and sequence
of testimony and examination of the
parties and their witnesses and limit the
issues.
(b) Telephonic hearings. When an
Administrative Judge has determined to
hold an oral hearing by telephone, an
order to that effect will be issued at least
15 days prior to the hearing notifying
the parties of the date and time of the
hearing. The order will direct the parties
to confirm, at least 48 hours in advance
of the hearing, that the correct telephone
numbers for the parties and their
witnesses are on file with the Office of
Proceedings, and warn that failure to
provide correct telephone numbers may
be deemed waiver of that party’s right
to participate in the hearing, to present
evidence, or to cross-examine other
witnesses. If a party is unavailable by
telephone at the appointed time, any
other party in attendance may present
testimony, and the Administrative Judge
also may impose any appropriate
sanction listed in § 12.35. All telephonic
hearings will be recorded electronically
but will be transcribed only upon
direction of the Administrative Judge (if
necessary) or in the event of
Commission review. The parties may
secure a copy of the recording of the
hearing from the Proceedings Clerk
upon written request and payment of
the cost of the recording.
(c) Washington, DC, hearings. In
exceptional circumstances and when an
in-person hearing is determined to be
necessary in resolving the issues, the
Administrative Judge may order an inperson hearing in Washington, DC,
upon written request by a party and the
agreement of at least one opposing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
party. The Administrative Judge will
issue notice of the time, date, and
location of an in-person hearing to the
parties at least 30 days in advance of the
hearing. Except as otherwise provided
in this section, an in-person hearing will
be held and recorded in the manner
prescribed in § 12.312(c) through (f). A
party not agreeing to appear at the
hearing in Washington, DC, may be
ordered to participate by telephone. Any
party not appearing in person or by
telephone will be deemed to have
waived the right to participate in the
hearing, to present evidence, or to crossexamine other witnesses; further, that
party may be subject to such action
under § 12.35 as the Administrative
Judge may find appropriate. The
Administrative Judge may order any
party who requests or agrees to appear
at a hearing in Washington, DC, and
fails to appear without good cause, to
pay any reasonable costs unnecessarily
incurred by parties appearing at such a
hearing.
(d) Compulsory process. An
application for a subpoena requiring a
non-party to participate in a telephonic
hearing or to appear at an in-person
hearing in Washington, DC, may be
made in writing to the Administrative
Judge without notice to the other
parties. The standards for issuance or
denial of an application for a subpoena,
the service and travel fee requirements,
and the method for enforcing such
subpoenas are set forth at § 12.313.
■ 39. In § 12.210, revise paragraphs (a),
(b) introductory text, (b)(1), and (c) to
read as follows:
§ 12.210
Initial decision.
(a) In general. Proposed findings of
fact and conclusions of law briefs shall
not be allowed. As soon as practicable
after all submissions of proof have been
received, the Administrative Judge shall
make the initial decision, which will be
filed forthwith with the Proceedings
Clerk. Upon filing of an initial decision,
the Proceedings Clerk shall immediately
serve upon the parties a copy of the
initial decision and a notification of the
effect of a party’s failure timely to
appeal the initial decision to the
Commission, as provided in paragraphs
(d) and (e) of this section, as well as the
effect of a failure by a party who has
been ordered to pay a reparation award
timely to file the documents required by
§ 12.407(c).
(b) Content of initial decision. In the
initial decision in a summary decisional
proceeding, the Administrative Judge
shall:
(1) Include a brief statement of the
findings as to the facts, with reference
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to those portions of the record which
support those findings;
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Costs; prejudgment interest. The
Administrative Judge may, in the initial
decision, award costs (including the
costs of instituting the proceeding, and
if appropriate, reasonable attorneys’
fees) and, if warranted as a matter of law
under the circumstances of the
particular case, prejudgment interest to
the party in whose favor a judgment is
entered.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 40. Amend § 12.303 as follows:
■ a. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through
(g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through (7);
■ b. Designate the introductory text as
paragraph (a) introductory text;
■ c. Revise newly designated paragraph
(a) introductory text;
■ d. Designate the undesignated
paragraph following newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(7) as paragraph (b); and
■ e. Revise newly designated paragraph
(b).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 12.303
Pre-decision conferences.
(a) During the time period permitted
for discovery pursuant to § 12.30(d), and
thereafter, Administrative Law Judges
may, in their discretion, conduct one or
more pre-decision conferences to be
held in Washington, DC, or by
telephone, with all parties for the
purposes of:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) At or following the conclusion of
a pre-decision conference,
Administrative Law Judges may serve a
pre-decision memorandum and order
setting forth the agreements reached by
the parties, any procedural
determinations made by them, and the
issues for resolution not disposed of by
admissions or agreements by the parties.
Such an order shall control the
subsequent course of the proceeding
unless modified to prevent injustice.
■ 41. In § 12.304, revise the introductory
text and paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 12.304 Functions and responsibilities of
the Administrative Law Judge.
Once an Administrative Law Judge
has been assigned the case, the
Administrative Law Judge shall be
responsible for the fair and orderly
conduct of a formal decisional
proceeding and shall have the authority:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) In the Administrative Law Judge’s
discretion, to conduct pre-decision
conferences, for the purposes prescribed
in § 12.303, at any time after a
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
proceeding has commenced pursuant to
§ 12.26(c);
*
*
*
*
*
■ 42. Revise § 12.305 to read as follows:
§ 12.305 Disqualification of Administrative
Law Judge.
(a) At their own request. An
Administrative Law Judge may
withdraw from a formal decisional
proceeding when they consider
themselves to be disqualified on the
grounds of personal bias, conflict of
interest, or similar bases. In such event,
they shall immediately notify the
Commission and each of the parties of
the withdrawal and of the basis for such
action.
(b) Upon the request of a party. Any
party may request an Administrative
Law Judge to disqualify themselves on
the grounds of personal bias, conflict of
interest, or similar bases. Interlocutory
review of an order denying such a
request may be sought without
certification of the matter by an
Administrative Law Judge, only in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in § 12.309.
■ 43. In § 12.307, revise paragraphs (a)
and (b) to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 12.307 Amended and supplemental
pleadings.
(a) Amendments to pleadings. At any
time before the parties have concluded
their submissions of proof, the
Administrative Law Judge may allow
amendments of the pleadings either
upon written consent of the parties or
for good cause shown. Any party may
file a response to a motion to amend the
pleadings within ten (10) days after the
date of service upon that party of the
motion.
(b) Supplemental pleadings. At any
time before the parties have concluded
their submissions of proof, and upon
such terms as are just, an
Administrative Law Judge may, upon
motion by a party, permit a party to
serve a supplemental pleading setting
forth transactions, occurrences or events
which have happened since the date of
the pleadings sought to be
supplemented and which are relevant to
the issues in the proceeding. Any party
may file a response to a motion to
supplement the pleadings within ten
(10) days after the date of service upon
that party of the motion.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 44. In § 12.308, revise paragraph (b),
republish paragraph (c) heading, and
revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 12.308
*
*
Motions.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
(b) Answer to motions. Any party may
serve and file a written response to a
motion within ten (10) days after service
of the motion upon that party, or within
such longer or shorter period as
established by this part, or as the
Administrative Law Judge or the
Commission may direct.
(c) Dismissal—(1) By the
Administrative Law Judge. The
Administrative Law Judge, acting on
their own motion, may, at any time after
they have been assigned the case:
(i) Dismiss the entire proceeding,
without prejudice to counterclaims, if
they find that none of the matters
alleged in the complaint state a claim
that is cognizable in reparations; or
(ii) Order dismissal of any claim,
counterclaim, or party from the
proceeding if they find that such claim
or counterclaim (by itself, or as applied
to a party) is not cognizable in
reparations.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 45. In § 12.309, revise paragraphs
(a)(1), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
§ 12.309 Interlocutory review by the
Commission.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) The appeal is from a ruling
pursuant to § 12.102, § 12.202, or
§ 12.305 refusing to grant a motion to
disqualify an Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge;
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Proceedings not stayed. The filing
of an application for interlocutory
review and a grant of review shall not
stay proceedings before an
Administrative Law Judge (or an
Administrative Judge, if applicable)
unless that official or the Commission
shall so order. The Commission will not
consider a motion for a stay unless the
motion shall have first been made to the
Administrative Law Judge (or, if
applicable, the Administrative Judge)
and denied.
(e) Interlocutory review by the
Commission on its own motion. Nothing
in this section should be construed as
restricting the Commission from acting
on its own motion to review on an
interlocutory basis any ruling of an
Administrative Law Judge, Proceedings
Officer or an Administrative Judge in
any proceeding commenced pursuant to
§ 12.26.
■ 46. In § 12.310, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), and (d) to read as follows:
§ 12.310
Summary disposition.
(a) Filing of motions, answers. Any
parties who believe that there is no
genuine issue of material fact to be
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64359
determined and that they are entitled to
a decision as a matter of law concerning
all issues of liability in the proceeding
may file a motion for summary
disposition at any time before a
determination is made by the
Administrative Law Judge to order an
oral hearing in the proceeding. Any
adverse party, within ten (10) days after
service of the motion, may file and serve
opposing papers or may countermove
for summary disposition.
(b) Supporting papers. A motion for
summary disposition shall include a
statement of all material facts as to
which the moving party contends that
there is no genuine issue, supported by
the pleadings, and by affidavits, other
verified statements, admissions,
stipulations, and interrogatories. The
motion may also be supported by briefs
containing points and authorities in
support of the contention of the party
making the motion. When a motion is
made and supported as provided in this
section, unless otherwise ordered by the
Administrative Law Judge, an adverse
party may not rest upon the mere
allegations, but shall serve and file in
response a statement setting forth those
material facts as to which the adverse
party contends a genuine issue exists,
supported by affidavits and other
verified material. The adverse party may
also submit a brief of points and
authorities.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Summary disposition upon motion
of the Administrative Law Judge. If the
Administrative Law Judge believes that
there may be no genuine issue of
material fact to be determined and that
one of the parties may be entitled to a
decision as a matter of law, the
Administrative Law Judge may direct
the parties to submit papers in support
of and in opposition to summary
disposition, and may hear oral
argument, substantially as provided in
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 47. Revise § 12.311 to read as follows:
§ 12.311 Disposing of proceeding or
issues without oral hearing.
If the Administrative Law Judge
determines that the documentary proof
and other tangible forms of proof
submitted by the parties are sufficient to
permit resolution of some or all of the
factual issues in the proceeding without
the need for oral testimony, the
Administrative Law Judge may order
that all proof relating to such issues be
submitted in documentary and tangible
form, and dispose of such issues
without an oral hearing. In such an
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
64360
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
event, proof in support of the complaint,
answer, and reply, may be found in
those verified documents, in
depositions on written interrogatories,
in admissible documents obtained
through discovery, in other verified
statements of fact, documents, and
tangible evidence.
■ 48. In § 12.312, revise paragraphs (b)
introductory text, (b)(2), (d)(1), (2), and
(4), and (g) to read as follows:
§ 12.312
Oral hearing.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Location of hearing. Unless the
Director of the Office of Proceedings for
reasons of administrative economy or
practical necessity determines
otherwise, and except as provided in
this paragraph (b), the location of an
oral hearing shall be in one of the
following cities: Albuquerque, N.M.;
Atlanta, Ga.; Boston, Mass.; Chicago, Ill.;
Cincinnati, Ohio; Columbia, S.C.;
Denver, Colo.; Houston, Tex.; Kansas
City, Mo.; Los Angeles, Cal.;
Minneapolis, Minn.; New Orleans, La.;
New York, N.Y.; Oklahoma City, Okla.;
Phoenix, Ariz.; San Diego, Cal.; San
Francisco, Cal.; Seattle, Wash.; St.
Petersburg, Fla.; and Washington, DC.
The Administrative Law Judge may, in
any case where a party avers, in an
affidavit, that none of the foregoing
cities is located within 300 miles of the
party’s principal residence, waive this
paragraph (b) and, upon giving due
regard for the convenience of all of the
parties, order that the hearing be held in
a more convenient locale.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Effect of failure to appear. If any
party to the proceeding fails to appear
at the hearing, or at any part thereof, the
non-appearing party shall to that extent
be deemed to have waived the
opportunity for an oral hearing in the
proceeding. The Administrative Law
Judge, for just cause, may take such
action as is appropriate pursuant to
§ 12.35 against a party who fails to
appear at the hearing. In the event that
a party appears at the hearing and no
party appears for the opposing side, the
party who is present may present
evidence, in whole or in part, in the
form of affidavits or by oral testimony,
before the Administrative Law Judge.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Conduct direct and crossexamination of parties and witnesses.
All witnesses at a hearing for the
purpose of taking evidence shall testify
under oath or affirmation, which shall
be administered by the Administrative
Law Judge. Unless otherwise ordered by
the Administrative Law Judge, parties
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
shall be entitled to present oral direct
testimony and other documentary proof,
and to conduct direct examination and
cross examine adverse parties and
witnesses. To expedite the hearing, the
Administrative Law Judge may, in their
discretion, order that the direct
testimony of the parties and their
witnesses be presented in documentary
form, by affidavit, interrogatory, and
other documents. In any event, the
Administrative Law Judge, in their
discretion, may permit cross
examination, without regard to the
scope of direct testimony, as to any
matter which is relevant to the issues in
the proceeding;
(2) Introduce exhibits. The original of
each exhibit introduced in evidence or
marked for identification shall be filed
unless the Administrative Law Judge
permits the substitution of copies for the
original documents. A copy of each
exhibit introduced by a party or marked
for identification shall be supplied by
the introducing party to the
Administrative Law Judge and to each
other party to the proceeding. Exhibits
shall be maintained by the reporter who
shall serve as custodian of the exhibits
until they are transmitted to the
Proceedings Clerk pursuant to
paragraph (f) of this section;
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Make offers of proof. When an
objection to a question propounded to a
witness is sustained, examiners may
make a specific offer of what they
expect to prove by the answer of the
witness. Rejected exhibits, adequately
marked for identification, shall be
retained in the record so as to be
available for consideration by any
reviewing authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law; briefs. An
Administrative Law Judge, upon their
own motion or upon motion of a party,
may permit the filing of post-hearing
proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law. Absent an order
permitting such findings and
conclusions, none shall be allowed.
Unless otherwise ordered by the
Administrative Law Judge and for good
cause shown, the proposed findings and
conclusions (including briefs in support
thereof), shall not exceed twenty-five
(25) pages and shall be filed not later
than forty-five (45) days after the close
of the oral hearing.
49. In § 12.313, revise paragraphs
(a)(2) and (b)(3), republish paragraph (c)
heading, and revise paragraphs (c)(1)
and (2) and (c)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 12.313 Subpoenas for attendance at an
oral hearing.
(a) * * *
(2) Standards for issuance or denial of
subpoenas. The Administrative Law
Judge considering any application for a
subpoena shall issue the subpoena if
they are satisfied the application
complies with this section and the
request is not unreasonable, oppressive,
excessive in scope or unduly
burdensome. In the event they
determine that a requested subpoena or
any of its terms is unreasonable,
oppressive, excessive in scope, or
unduly burdensome, the Administrative
Law Judge may refuse to issue the
subpoena, or may issue it only upon
such conditions as they determine
fairness requires.
(b) * * *
(3) Rulings. The motion shall be
decided by the Administrative Law
Judge and the order shall provide such
terms and conditions for the production
of the material, the disclosure of the
information, or the appearance of the
witnesses as may appear necessary and
appropriate for the protection of the
public interest.
(c) Service of subpoenas—(1) How
effected. Service of a subpoena upon a
party shall be made in accordance with
§ 12.10. Service of a subpoena upon any
other person shall be made by
delivering a copy of the subpoena to
them as provided in paragraph (c)(2) or
(3) of this section, and by tendering to
them the fees for one day’s attendance
and the mileage as specified in
paragraph (e) of this section. When the
subpoena is issued at the instance of
any officer or agency of the United
States, fees and mileage need not be
tendered at the time of service.
(2) Service upon a natural person.
Delivery of a copy of a subpoena and
tender of fees and mileage to a natural
person may be effected by:
(i) Handing them to the person;
(ii) Leaving them at the person’s office
with the person in charge thereof or, if
there is no one in charge, by leaving the
subpoena in a conspicuous place
therein;
(iii) Leaving them at the person’s
dwelling place or usual place of abode
with some person of suitable age and
discretion then residing therein;
(iv) Mailing them by registered or
certified mail to them at their last
known address; or
(v) Any other method whereby actual
notice is given to the person and the
fees and mileage are timely made
available.
(3) * * *
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Mailing them by registered or
certified mail to any such representative
at the person’s last known address; or
*
*
*
*
*
■ 50. In § 12.314, revise paragraphs (a)
and (b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 12.314
Initial decision.
(a) In general. The Administrative
Law Judge as soon as practicable after
the parties have completed their
submissions of proof, or after the
conclusion of an oral hearing if one is
held, shall render the initial decision,
which shall forthwith be filed with the
Proceedings Clerk, and a copy of which
shall be served immediately by the
Proceedings Clerk upon each of the
parties. The Proceedings Clerk shall also
serve a notice, to accompany the initial
decision, of the effect of a party’s failure
timely to appeal to the Commission the
initial decision, as provided in
paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section,
and the effect of a failure of a party who
has been ordered to pay a reparation
award timely to file the documents
required by § 12.407(c).
(b) * * *
(1) Include a brief statement of
findings as to the facts, with references
to those portions of the record which
support those findings;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 51. Revise § 12.402 to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 12.402 Appeal of disposition of less than
all claims or parties in a proceeding.
(a) In general. Where two or more
different claims for relief are presented,
or where multiple parties are involved,
in a proceeding forwarded pursuant to
§ 12.26(b) or (c), the Administrative
Judge or Administrative Law Judge, may
upon the Judge’s own motion or by
motion of a party, direct that an initial
decision or other order disposing of one
or more, but fewer than all of the claims
or parties, shall be final and
immediately appealable to the
Commission. Such a direction may be
made only upon an express
determination that there is no just
reason for delay. When such a direction
is made, a party may appeal the initial
decision or order in accordance with the
procedure prescribed by § 12.401.
(b) When decision is not appealable.
In the absence of such a direction by the
Administrative Judge or an
Administrative Law Judge, an initial
decision or order disposing of fewer
than all of the claims or all of the parties
shall be subject to revision by the
decisionmaker at any time before a
disposition is made of all remaining
claims or parties, and no appeal may be
taken to the Commission pursuant to
this section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
■
52. Revise § 12.405 to read as follows:
§ 12.405 Leave to adduce additional
evidence.
Any time prior to issuance of its final
decision pursuant to § 12.406, the
Commission may, after notice to the
parties and an opportunity for them to
present their views, reopen the hearing
to receive further evidence. The
application shall show to the
satisfaction of the Commission that the
additional evidence is material, and that
there were reasonable grounds for
failure to adduce such evidence at the
hearing. The Commission may receive
the additional evidence or may remand
the proceeding to the Administrative
Judge or Administrative Law Judge to
receive the additional evidence.
■ 53. In § 12.407, revise paragraphs (c)
introductory text and (d) to read as
follows:
§ 12.407 Satisfaction of reparation award;
enforcement; sanctions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Automatic suspension. A person
required to pay a reparation award shall
be prohibited from trading on all
contract markets and if such person is
registered, the registration shall be
suspended automatically, without
further notice, unless such person shall,
within fifteen (15) days after the time
limit for satisfaction of an award (as
prescribed in paragraph (a) or (b) of this
section) expires, file with the
Proceedings Clerk and serve on the
other parties:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Reinstatement. The sanctions
imposed in accordance with paragraph
(c) of this section shall remain in effect
until the person required to pay the
reparation award demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Commission that the
amount required has been paid in full
including prejudgment interest if
awarded and post-judgment interest at
the prevailing rate computed in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1961 from
the date directed in the final order to the
date of payment, compounded annually.
In the event an award of post-judgment
interest is inadvertently omitted, such
interest nevertheless shall run as
calculated in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
1961 and the rules in this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 54. In § 12.408, revise the introductory
text and paragraphs (a)(2) introductory
text, (a)(2)(ii) and (iii), (a)(3), (4), and
(6), and (b) to read as follows:
§ 12.408 Delegation of authority to the
General Counsel.
Pursuant to the authority granted
under section 2(a)(4) and 2(a)(11) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64361
Commodity Exchange Act, as amended,
7 U.S.C. 4a(c) and 4a(j), the Commission
hereby delegates, until such time as it
orders otherwise, the following
functions to the General Counsel, to be
performed by them, or such person or
persons under their direction as they
may designate from time to time:
(a) * * *
(2) Remand, with or without specific
instructions, initial decisions or other
orders disposing of the entire
proceeding to the appropriate officer
(Director of the Office of Proceedings,
Administrative Judge, or Administrative
Law Judge) in the following situations—
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Where, in their judgment,
clarification or supplementation of an
initial decision or other order disposing
of the entire proceeding prior to
Commission review is appropriate; and
(iii) Where, in their judgment, a
ministerial act necessary to the proper
conduct of the proceeding has not been
performed;
(3) Deny applications for interlocutory
review by the Commission of a ruling of
an Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge in cases in
which the Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge has not
certified the ruling to the Commission
in the manner prescribed by § 12.309,
and the ruling does not concern the
disqualification of, or a motion to
disqualify, an Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge, or the
suspension of, or failure to suspend, an
attorney from participating in reparation
proceedings;
(4) Dismiss any appeal from an initial
decision or other disposition of the
entire proceeding by an Administrative
Law Judge (or Administrative Judge), in
a proceeding where such appeal is not
filed or perfected in accordance with
§ 12.401, and deny any application for
interlocutory review if it is not filed in
accordance with § 12.309;
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Enter any order that, in their
judgment, will facilitate or expedite
Commission review of an initial
decision or other order disposing of the
entire proceeding.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of
paragraph (a) of this section, in any case
in which the General Counsel believes
it appropriate, the General Counsel or
their designee may submit the matter to
the Commission for its consideration.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
64362
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 220 / Thursday, November 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3,
2021, by the Commission.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
Note: The following appendix will not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Appendix to Changing Position Title of
Judgment Officer to Administrative
Judge—Commission Voting Summary
On this matter, Acting Chairman Behnam
and Commissioners Stump and Berkovitz
voted in the affirmative.* No Commissioner
voted in the negative.
[FR Doc. 2021–24449 Filed 11–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1310
[Docket No. DEA–678]
Designation of Methyl alphaphenylacetoacetate, a Precursor
Chemical Used in the Illicit
Manufacture of Phenylacetone,
Methamphetamine, and Amphetamine,
as a List I Chemical
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Drug Enforcement
Administration is finalizing, without
change, a March 30, 2021, notice of
proposed rulemaking to designate the
chemical methyl alphaphenylacetoacetate (also known as
MAPA; methyl 3-oxo-2phenylbutanoate; methyl 2phenylacetoacetate; a-acetylbenzeneacetic acid, methyl ester; and
CAS Number: 16648–44–5) and its
optical isomers as a list I chemical
under the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA). Methyl alpha-phenylacetoacetate
is used in clandestine laboratories to
illicitly manufacture the schedule II
controlled substances phenylacetone
(also known as phenyl-2-propanone,
P2P, or benzyl methyl ketone),
methamphetamine, and amphetamine
and is important to the manufacture of
these controlled substances. This final
rulemaking subjects handlers
(manufacturers, distributors, importers,
and exporters) of MAPA to the chemical
regulatory provisions of the CSA and its
implementing regulations.
DATES: Effective December 20, 2021.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
* Commissioner Berkovitz submitted his written
vote on this matter prior to departing the
Commission on October 15, 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:29 Nov 17, 2021
Jkt 256001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terrence L. Boos, Drug and Chemical
Evaluation Section, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Telephone: (571) 362–
3249.
This final
rule designates methyl alphaphenylacetoacetate (MAPA; methyl 3oxo-2-phenylbutanoate) and its optical
isomers as a list I chemical. This action
subjects handlers of MAPA to the
chemical regulatory provisions of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and its
implementing regulations. This
rulemaking does not establish a
threshold for domestic and international
transactions of MAPA. As such, all
MAPA transactions are regulated,
regardless of transaction size, and are
subject to control under the CSA. In
addition, chemical mixtures containing
MAPA are not exempt from regulatory
requirements at any concentration.
Therefore, all transactions of chemical
mixtures containing any quantity of
MAPA are regulated pursuant to the
CSA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Legal Authority
The CSA and the Drug Enforcement
Administration’s (DEA) implementing
regulations give the Attorney General, as
delegated to the Administrator of DEA
(Administrator), the authority to specify,
by regulation, a chemical as a ‘‘list I
chemical.’’ 1 This term refers to a
chemical that is used in manufacturing
a controlled substance in violation of
subchapter I (Control and Enforcement)
of the CSA and is important to the
manufacture of the controlled
substance.2 The current list of all list I
chemicals is available in 21 CFR
1310.02(a).
In addition, the United States is a
Party to the 1988 United Nations
Convention against Illicit Traffic in
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances (1988 Convention),
December 20, 1988, 1582 U.N.T.S. 95.
Under Article 12 of the 1988
Convention, when the United States
receives notification that a chemical has
been added to Table I or Table II of the
1988 Convention, the United States is
required to take measures it deems
appropriate to monitor the manufacture
and distribution of that chemical within
the United States and to prevent its
diversion, including measures related to
international trade.
1 21 U.S.C. 802(34) and 871(b) and 21 CFR
1310.02(c).
2 21 U.S.C. 802(34) and 21 CFR 1300.02(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Background
In a letter dated May 7, 2020, the
Secretary-General of the United Nations,
in accordance with Article 12,
paragraph 6 of the 1988 Convention,
informed the United States Secretary of
State that the Commission on Narcotic
Drugs (CND) voted to place the chemical
methyl alpha-phenylacetoacetate
(MAPA), including its optical isomers,
in Table I of the 1988 Convention (CND
Decision 63/1) at its 63rd Session on
March 4, 2020.
On March 30, 2021, DEA published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
[86 FR 16558] to designate methyl
alpha-phenylacetoacetate (MAPA;
methyl 3-oxo-2-phenylbutanoate) and
its optical isomers as a list I chemical
under the CSA. In the NPRM, the Acting
Administrator found that MAPA is used
in, and is important to, the manufacture
of the schedule II substances
phenylacetone (also known as phenyl-2propanone, P2P, or benzyl methyl
ketone), methamphetamine, and
amphetamine. Clandestine laboratory
operators have circumvented the
schedule II controls on P2P by
developing a variety of synthetic
methods for producing P2P, which they
then convert to methamphetamine and
amphetamine.
MAPA is a close chemical relative of
precursors controlled under the CSA
and the 1988 Convention (e.g., alphaphenylacetoacetonitrile (APAAN) and
alpha-phenylacetoacetamide (APAA))
and the timing of its emergence suggests
it is trafficked to circumvent these
precursor controls, particularly the more
recent control on APAA.3 DEA has not
identified any known legitimate use for
MAPA, other than in small amounts for
research, development, and laboratory
analytical purposes. The International
Narcotics Control Board (INCB) notes
that MAPA does not have any legitimate
use,4 and despite this, the INCB
highlighted an increase in the frequency
of seizures and amounts seized reported
through Precursors Incident
Communication System (PICS) since
November 2018.5 This trend continued
3 The CND added APAAN and APAA to Table I
of the 1988 Convention in March 2014 and March
2019, respectively. DEA designated APAAN and
APAA as list I chemicals on July 14, 2017 (effective
date: August 14, 2017) [82 FR 32457], and May 10,
2021 (effective date: June 9, 2021) [86 FR 24703],
respectively, with a correction notice for APAA on
June 7, 2021 [86 FR 30169].
4 Statement by Mr. Cornelis de Joncheere,
President, International Narcotics Control Board,
Reconvened sixty-second session of the
Commission on Narcotic Drugs, 13 December 2019,
at 1.
5 The Precursors Incident Communication System
or PICS is a worldwide, real-time, on-line tool for
communication and information sharing between
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 220 (Thursday, November 18, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64349-64362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24449]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 12
RIN 3038-AF17
Changing Position Title of Judgment Officer to Administrative
Judge
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission or CFTC)
is adopting technical amendments to its Rules Relating to Reparations
to change the position title of the Judgment Officer to Administrative
Judge and to incorporate gender neutral language, where applicable.
DATES: Effective November 18, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Smith, Director, Office of
Proceedings, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, at (202) 418-5395 or
[email protected], Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW,
Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In February 2013, the Commission amended 17
CFR parts 10 and 12 to clarify the role and authority of its
[[Page 64350]]
Judgment Officers.\1\ In this rulemaking, the Commission is adopting
technical amendments to 17 CFR part 12 that more accurately describe
the duties performed by the adjudicator in reparations cases and other
administrative proceedings by changing the title of Judgment Officer to
Administrative Judge. The technical amendments adopted in this final
rule simplify and improve the language of the rules by using plain
language for the adjudicator instead of the overly legalistic term
``Judgment Officer,'' and by incorporating gender neutral language into
part 12, where applicable; thereby, making the rules easier to
understand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Proceedings Before the Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
78 FR 12933 (Feb. 26, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Matters
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The amendments to the Commission's regulations in this rulemaking
do not establish any new substantive or legislative rules, but rather
are technical amendments to its Rules Relating to Reparations to change
the position title of the Judgment Officer to Administrative Judge and
to incorporate gender neutral language, where applicable. The
amendments to the Commission's regulations relate solely to agency
management, organization, procedure, and practice and provide technical
corrections of a minor and administrative nature. Therefore, this
rulemaking is excepted from the public rulemaking provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act.\2\ Additionally, an agency may issue a
new rule in some circumstances without publication in the Federal
Register of a notice of proposed rulemaking with an opportunity for
comment if the agency for ``good cause'' finds (and incorporates the
finding and a brief statement of the reasons therefor in the rules
issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' \3\ As noted
earlier, the amendments to part 12 are technical edits to improve the
language of the rules and incorporate gender neutral language. Good
cause thus exists as the final rule implements changes that affect
internal agency management, organization and procedure that exempts it
from notice and comment rulemaking. Further, as the revisions to the
Commission's regulations in this rulemaking will not cause any party to
undertake efforts to comply with the regulations as revised, the
Commission has determined to make this rulemaking effective upon
publication in the Federal Register.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 5 U.S.C. 553(a) and (b)(A). Rulemaking procedures do not
apply, to the extent that there is involved a matter relating to
agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants,
benefits, or contracts or to interpretative rules, general
statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or
practice.
\3\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
\4\ Section 553(d) of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(d), provides, in
part, that a rule may not be made effective less than 30 days before
its effective date except as otherwise provided by the agency for
good cause found and published with the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires the Commission to consider
whether the regulations it adopts will have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.\5\ The Commission is
obligated to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule for
which the agency publishes a general notice of proposed rulemaking
pursuant to section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other law.\6\ This rulemaking is excepted from the public rulemaking
provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act. Accordingly, the
Commission is not required to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis
for this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
\6\ 5 U.S.C. 601(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Commission may not conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not
required to respond to, a collection of information contained in a
rulemaking unless the information collection displays a currently valid
control number issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Paperwork Reduction
Act).\7\ This final rule does not contain a collection of information
as defined in the Paperwork Reduction Act and, therefore, is not
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Section 15 of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended by the
Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, provides that before
promulgating a regulation under the Act or issuing an order, the
Commission shall consider the costs and benefits of the action of the
Commission.\8\ These rules govern internal agency organization,
procedure, and practice, and therefore the Commission finds that none
of the considerations enumerated in section 15(a)(2) of the Commodity
Exchange Act, as amended, are applicable to these rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 7 U.S.C. 19(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Congressional Review Act
This final rule is not a rule as defined in the Congressional
Review Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 5 U.S.C. 801 through 808.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 12
Administrative practice and procedure, Consumer protection,
Organization and functions (Government agencies), Reparations.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission amends 17 CFR part 12 as set forth below:
PART 12--RULES RELATING TO REPARATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 12 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2(a)(12), 12a(5), and 18.
0
2. Revise Sec. 12.2 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.2 Definitions.
For purposes of this part:
Act means the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 1, et
seq.
Administrative Judge means an employee of the Commission who is
authorized to conduct all reparations proceedings. In appropriate
circumstances, the functions of an Administrative Judge may be
performed by an Administrative Law Judge.
Administrative Law Judge means an administrative law judge
appointed pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 3105.
Commission means the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Commission decisional employee means an employee or employees of
the Commission who are or may reasonably be expected to be involved in
the decisionmaking process in any proceeding, including, but not
limited to: An Administrative Judge; members of the personal staffs of
the Commissioners, but not the Commissioners themselves; members of the
staffs of the Administrative Law Judges, but not an Administrative Law
Judge; members of the staffs of the Administrative Judges; members of
the Office of the General Counsel; members of the staff of the Office
of Proceedings; and other Commission employees who may be assigned to
hear or to participate in the decision of a particular matter.
Complainant means a person who, individually or jointly with
others, has applied to the Commission for a reparation award pursuant
to section 14(a) of the Act, but shall not include a cross claimant or
any other type of
[[Page 64351]]
third-party claimant. The term ``complainant'' under this part applies
equally to two or more persons who have applied jointly for a
reparation award.
Complaint means any document which constitutes an application for a
reparation award pursuant to section 14(a) of the Act, regardless of
whether it is denominated as such.
Counterclaim means an application for a reparation award by a
respondent against a complainant which satisfies the requirements of
Sec. 12.19. A counterclaim does not mean a cross claim or other type
of third party claim.
Director of the Office of Proceedings means an employee of the
Commission who serves as the administrative head of that Office, with
responsibility and authority to assure that the rules in this part are
administered in a manner which will effectuate the purposes of section
14(b) of the Act. The Director is authorized to convene meetings of all
personnel in the Office of Proceedings, including Administrative
Judges, Administrative Law Judges, and the Judges' personally assigned
law clerks. The Director shall have the authority to delegate their
duties to administer Sec. Sec. 12.15, 12.24, 12.26, and 12.27, and,
shall have the authority to assign and, if necessary, reassign the
duties of, and set reasonable standards for performance for, all
personnel in the Office, including the Administrative Judges, but not
including Administrative Law Judges and their personally assigned law
clerks.
Ex parte communication means an oral or written communication not
on the public record with respect to which reasonable prior notice to
all parties is not given, but does not include:
(1) A discussion, after consent has been obtained from all of the
named parties, between a party and an Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge, or the staffs of the foregoing, pertaining
solely to the possibility of settling the case without the need for a
decision;
(2) Requests for status reports, including questions relating to
service of the complaint, and the registration status of any persons,
on any matter or proceeding covered by this part; or
(3) Requests made to the Office of Proceedings or the Office of the
General Counsel for interpretation of this part.
Formal decisional procedure means, where the amount of total
damages claimed exceeds $30,000, exclusive of interest and costs, a
procedure elected by the complainant or a respondent where the parties
may be granted an oral hearing. A formal decisional proceeding is
governed by subpart E of this part.
Hearing means that part of a proceeding which involves the
submission of proof, either by oral presentation or written submission.
Interested person means any party, and includes any person or
agency permitted limited participation or to state views in a
reparation proceeding, or other person who might be adversely affected
or aggrieved by the outcome of a proceeding (including the officers,
agents, employees, associates, affiliates, attorneys, accountants or
other representatives of such persons), and any other person having a
direct or indirect pecuniary or other interest in the outcome of a
proceeding.
Office of the General Counsel refers to the members of the
Commission's staff who provide assistance to the Commission in its
direct review of any proceeding conducted pursuant to this part.
Office of Proceedings means that Office within the Commission
comprised of the Administrative Law Judges, Administrative Judges, the
Director of that Office, the Proceedings Clerk, and members of the
staffs of the foregoing, which administers the rules in this part,
other than the rules in this part authorizing direct review by the
Commission.
Order means the whole or any part of a final procedural or
substantive disposition of a reparation proceeding by the Commission,
an Administrative Law Judge, an Administrative Judge, or the
Proceedings Clerk.
Party means a complainant, respondent or any other person or agency
named or admitted as a party in a reparation matter.
Person means any individual, association, partnership, corporation
or trust.
Pleading means the complaint, the answer to the complaint, any
supplement or amendment thereto, and any reply to the foregoing.
Proceeding means a case in which the pleadings have been forwarded
and in which a procedure has been commenced pursuant to Sec. 12.26.
Proceedings Clerk means that member of the Commission's staff in
the Office of Proceedings who shall maintain the Commission's
reparation docket, assign reparation cases to an appropriate
decisionmaking official, and act as custodian of the records of
proceedings.
Punitive damages means damages awarded (no more than two times the
amount of actual damages) in the case of any action arising from a
willful and intentional violation in the execution of an order on the
floor of a contract market. An order does not have to be actually
executed to render a violation subject to punitive damages. As a
prerequisite to an award of punitive damages, a complainant must claim
actual and punitive damages, prove actual damages, and demonstrate that
punitive damages are appropriate.
Registrant means any person who--
(1) Was registered under the Act at the time of the alleged
violation;
(2) Is subject to reparation proceedings by virtue of section 4m of
the Commodity Exchange Act, regardless of whether such person was ever
registered under the Act; or
(3) Is otherwise subject to reparation proceedings under the Act.
Reparation award means the amount of monetary damages a party may
be ordered to pay.
Respondent means any person or persons against whom a complainant
seeks a reparation award pursuant to section 14(a) of the Act.
Summary decisional procedure means, where the amount of total
damages claimed does not exceed $30,000, exclusive of interest and
costs, a procedure elected by the complainant or the respondent wherein
an oral hearing need not be held and proof in support of each party's
case may be supplied in the form and manner prescribed by Sec. 12.208.
A summary decisional proceeding is governed by subpart D of this part.
Voluntary decisional procedure means, regardless of the amount of
damages claimed, a procedure which the complainant and the respondent
have chosen voluntarily to submit their claims and counterclaims,
allowable under this part, for an expeditious resolution by an
Administrative Judge. By electing the voluntary decisional procedure,
parties agree that a decision issued by an Administrative Judge shall
be without accompanying findings of fact and shall be final without
right of Commission review or judicial review. A voluntary decisional
proceeding is governed by subpart C of this part.
0
3. Amend Sec. 12.5 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraph (a); and
0
b. Remove the undesignated paragraph following paragraph (a).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 12.5 Computation of time.
(a) In general. In computing any period of time prescribed by the
rules in this part or allowed by the Commission, the Director of the
Office of Proceedings, an Administrative Judge, or an Administrative
Law Judge, the day of the act, event, or default from which the
designated period of time begins to run is not to be included. The last
day of the period so computed is to be included unless it is a
Saturday, a Sunday, or a
[[Page 64352]]
legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next
day which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday. Intermediate
Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded from the
computation only when the period of time prescribed or allowed is less
than seven (7) days.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 12.6, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.6 Extensions of time; adjournments; postponements.
(a) In general. Except as otherwise provided by law or by the rules
in this part, for good cause shown, the Commission, or an
Administrative Judge, Administrative Law Judge, or the Director of the
Office of Proceedings, before whom a matter is then pending, on their
own motion or the motion of a party, may at any time extend or shorten
the time limit prescribed by the rules in this part for filing any
document. In any instance in which a time limit is not prescribed for
an action to be taken concerning any matter, the Commission or one of
the other officials mentioned above may set a time limit for that
action.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 12.7, republish paragraph (c) heading and revise paragraph
(c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.7 Ex parte communications in reparation proceedings.
* * * * *
(c) Sanctions. (1) Upon receipt of an ex parte communication
knowingly made or knowingly caused to be made by a party in violation
of the prohibition contained in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the
Commission, Administrative Law Judge, or an Administrative Judge may,
to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy
of the Act, require the parties to show cause why their claims or
interest in the proceeding should not be dismissed, denied,
disregarded, or otherwise adversely affected on account of such
violation.
* * * * *
0
6. Revise Sec. 12.8 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.8 Separation of functions.
(a) An Administrative Judge, or Administrative Law Judge, will not
be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of any
officer, employee, or agent of the Commission engaged in the
performance of investigative or prosecutorial functions for the
Commission.
(b) No officer, employee, or agent of the Federal Government
engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecutorial functions
in connection with any proceeding shall, in that proceeding or a
factually related proceeding, participate or advise in the decision of
an Administrative Judge, or Administrative Law Judge, except as a
witness in the proceeding, without the express written consent of the
parties to the proceeding. This paragraph (b) shall not apply to the
Commissioners.
0
7. In Sec. 12.9, republish paragraph (a) heading and revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.9 Practice before the Commission.
(a) Practice--(1) By non-attorneys. Individuals may appear pro se
(on their own behalf); a general partner may represent the partnership;
a bona fide officer of a corporation, trust, or association may
represent the corporation, trust, or association.
* * * * *
(b) Debarment of counsel or representative during the course of a
proceeding. (1) Whenever, while a proceeding is pending before them, an
Administrative Judge or an Administrative Law Judge finds that a person
acting as counsel or representative for any party to the proceeding is
guilty of contemptuous conduct, such official may order that such
person be precluded from further acting as counsel or representative in
the proceeding. An immediate appeal to the Commission may be taken from
any such order, pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 12.309, but the
proceeding shall not be delayed or suspended pending disposition of the
appeal; Provided, that the official may suspend the proceedings for a
reasonable time for the purpose of enabling the party to obtain other
counsel or representative.
(2) Whenever the Administrative Judge or Administrative Law Judge
has issued an order precluding a person from further acting as counsel
or representative in a proceeding, such official, within a reasonable
time thereafter, shall submit to the Commission a report of the facts
and circumstances surrounding the issuance of the order and shall
recommend what action the Commission should take respecting the
appearance of such person as counsel or representative in other
proceedings before the Commission.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 12.10, revise paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.10 Service.
* * * * *
(b) Service of orders and decisions. A copy of all notices,
rulings, opinions, and orders of the Proceedings Clerk, the Director of
the Office of Proceedings, an Administrative Judge, an Administrative
Law Judge, the General Counsel or any employee under the General
Counsel's supervision as the General Counsel may designate, or the
Commission shall be served by the Proceedings Clerk on each of the
parties. The Commission, in its discretion and with due consideration
for the convenience of the parties, may serve the aforementioned
documents to the parties by electronic means.
(c) Designation of person to receive service. The first page of the
first document filed in a proceeding by a party or participant shall
include the contact information of a person authorized to receive
service on their behalf. Thereafter, service of documents shall be made
upon the person authorized unless service on the party is ordered by an
Administrative Judge, an Administrative Law Judge or the Commission, or
unless no person authorized to receive service can be found, or unless
the person authorized to receive service is changed by the party upon
due notice to all other parties.
0
9. In Sec. 12.11, republish paragraph (d) heading and revise
paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2) introductory text, and (d)(2)(i) and (iii) to
read as follows:
Sec. 12.11 Formalities of filing of documents with the Proceedings
Clerk.
* * * * *
(d) Signature--(1) Manner. The original of all papers must be
signed in ink by persons filing the same or by their duly authorized
agents or attorneys.
(2) Effect. The signature on any document of persons acting either
for themselves or as attorney or agent for another constitutes
certification by them that:
(i) They have read the document and know the contents thereof;
* * * * *
(iii) To the best of their knowledge, information and belief, every
statement contained in the document is true and not misleading; and
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 12.12, revise paragraphs (b) introductory text and (b)(1)
and (3) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.12 Signature.
* * * * *
(b) Effect. The signature on any document of any persons acting
either for themselves or as attorney or agent for another constitutes
certification by them that:
[[Page 64353]]
(1) They have read the document subscribed and know the contents
thereof;
* * * * *
(3) To the best of their knowledge, information, and belief, every
statement contained in the document is true and not misleading; and
* * * * *
0
11. In Sec. 12.13, revise paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.13 Complaint; election of procedure.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Subscription and verification of the complaint. Each complaint
shall be signed personally by an individual complainant or by a duly
authorized officer or agent of a complainant who is not a natural
person. Complainant's signature shall be given under oath or
affirmation under penalty of law attesting either that complainant
knows the facts set forth in the complaint to be true, or believes the
facts set forth to be true, in which event the information upon which
complainant formed that belief shall be set forth with particularity.
* * * * *
0
12. Revise Sec. 12.14 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.14 Withdrawal of complaint.
At any time prior to service of notification to the complainant
pursuant to Sec. 12.15(a) of the Director of the Office of
Proceedings' determination to forward the complaint to a registrant,
complainant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the complaint
which shall terminate the Commission's consideration of the complaint
without prejudice to complainant's right to re-file a reparations
complaint based upon the same set of facts within two years after the
cause of action accrues. If the complainant has previously filed a
notice of withdrawal of a complaint based upon the same set of facts,
the notice of withdrawal of complaint shall terminate the case with
prejudice to complainant's rights to re-file a complaint in reparations
based on the same set of facts, but such termination shall be regarded
by the Commission as without prejudice to complainant's right to seek
redress in such alternative forums as may be available for adjudication
of the claims.
0
13. In Sec. 12.15, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.15 Notification of complaint.
* * * * *
(b) Determination not to forward complaint. The Director may, in
their discretion, refuse to forward a complaint as to a particular
respondent if it appears that the matters alleged therein are not
cognizable in reparations, or that grounds exist pursuant to Sec.
12.24(c) or (d) for refusing to forward the complaint. If the Director
of the Office of Proceedings should determine not to forward the
complaint to all registrants named in the complaint in accordance with
this section, no proceeding shall be held thereon and the complainant
shall be notified to that effect. If the Director determines to forward
the complaint as to less than all of the registrants, the complainant
shall be so notified. A termination of the complaint as to any
registrant shall be regarded by the Commission as without prejudice to
the right of the complainant to seek such alternative forms of relief
as may be available.
0
14. Revise Sec. 12.17 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.17 Satisfaction of complaint.
A respondent may satisfy the complaint:
(a) By paying to the complainant either the amount to which the
complainant claims to be entitled as set forth in the complaint or such
other amount as the complainant will accept in satisfaction of the
claim; and
(b) By submitting to the Commission notice of satisfaction and
withdrawal of the complaint, duly executed by the complainant and the
respondent.
0
15. In Sec. 12.18, revise paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 12.18 Answer; election of procedure.
* * * * *
(b) Motion for reconsideration of determination to forward the
complaint. An answer may include a motion for reconsideration of the
determination to forward the complaint, specifying the grounds
therefor, which the Director of the Office of Proceedings, in their
discretion, may grant by terminating the case pursuant to Sec. 12.27,
or deny by forwarding the pleadings and matters of record for an
elected decisional proceeding pursuant to Sec. 12.26. The inclusion in
an answer of a motion for reconsideration shall not preclude a
respondent, if the motion is denied, from moving for dismissal at a
later stage of the proceeding for the same reasons cited in a motion
for reconsideration pursuant to this paragraph (b).
(c) Subscription and verification of the answer. An answer shall be
signed personally by each registrant on behalf of whom it is filed or
by a duly authorized officer or agent of any such registrant who is not
a natural person. Each registrant's signature shall be given under
oath, or by affirmation under penalty of law, attesting that the signer
has read the answer; that to the best of the signer's knowledge all of
the statements in the answer, the counterclaim (if any), and the
materials required by this part to be appended thereto, are accurate
and true, and that the answer (and counterclaim, if any) has not been
interposed for delay.
(d) Affidavit of service. The registrant shall file with the answer
an affidavit showing that a true copy of the answer has been served
upon the complainant, either personally or by first-class mail
addressed to the complainant at the address set forth in the complaint.
* * * * *
0
16. In Sec. 12.20, revise paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.20 Response to counterclaim; reply; election of procedure.
(a) Response to counterclaim. If an answer asserts a counterclaim,
the complainant shall, within thirty (30) days after service of the
answer by the respondent:
(1) Satisfy the counterclaim as if it were a complaint, in the
manner prescribed by Sec. 12.17; or
(2) File a reply to the counterclaim with the Commission.
* * * * *
(c) Election of decisional procedure. If neither the complainant
nor the respondent, in the complaint or answer respectively, has
previously made an election of the summary decisional procedure or the
formal decisional procedure, the complainant may make such an election
in the reply.
0
17. In Sec. 12.21, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.21 Voluntary dismissal.
(a) At any time after the Director of the Office of Proceedings has
served notification to the parties pursuant to Sec. 12.15 of the
Director's determination to forward the complaint to the respondent for
a response, either the complainant or the respondent may obtain
dismissal of the complaint (or the proceeding, if one has commenced) by
filing a stipulation of dismissal, duly executed by all of the
complainants and each respondent against whom the complaint has been
forwarded (or added as a party in the course of a proceeding); provided
however, that if the stipulation is filed after any respondent has
filed an answer, the terms of the stipulation shall include a dismissal
of any counterclaims in the answer.
* * * * *
0
18. In Sec. 12.22, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
[[Page 64354]]
Sec. 12.22 Default proceedings.
* * * * *
(b) Default procedure. Upon a party's failure to respond timely to
a complaint or counterclaim as prescribed in Sec. Sec. 12.16 and
12.20, or timely to comply with Sec. 12.25(b) or (c), the Director of
the Office of Proceedings shall forward the pleadings, and other
materials then of record, to an Administrative Judge or Administrative
Law Judge who may thereafter enter findings and conclusions concerning
the questions of violations and damages and, if warranted, enter a
reparation award against the non-responding party. If the facts which
are treated as admitted are considered insufficient to support a
violation or the amount of reparations sought, the Administrative Judge
or Administrative Law Judge may order production of supplementary
evidence from the party not in default and may enter a default order
and an award based thereon.
* * * * *
0
19. In Sec. 12.23, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.23 Setting aside of default.
* * * * *
(b) Default order final. A default order that has become final
pursuant to Sec. 12.22(c) shall not be set aside except upon a motion
filed and served by the defaulted party showing that the defaulted
party should be relieved from the default order because of fraud
perpetrated on a decisionmaking official or the Commission, mistake,
excusable neglect, or because the order is void for want of
jurisdiction. Such a motion shall also show that, if the default order
were set aside, there would be a reasonable likelihood of success for
the defaulted party's claim or defense on the merits and that no party
would be prejudiced thereby. Motions to set aside a final default order
for fraud, mistake, or excusable neglect shall be filed within one year
after the order was issued. All motions to set aside default orders
shall be decided, in the first instance, by the official who issued the
order. A denial of a motion to set aside a default order that has
become final shall be treated as an initial decision, which may be
appealed to the Commission in accordance with the requirements of Sec.
12.401. A grant of a motion to set aside a final default order shall be
treated as a nonfinal order which may be appealed only in accordance
with the requirements of Sec. 12.309.
0
20. In Sec. 12.24, revise paragraphs (a)(1)(iii) and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 12.24 Parallel proceedings.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Is governed by a compulsory counterclaim rule of Federal
court procedure which required the complainant in reparations to assert
all of complainant's claims (including those based on alleged
violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, and any regulation or order
issued thereunder) as counterclaims in that proceeding;
* * * * *
(e) Exceptions. At the time notice of a parallel proceeding is
filed pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, or any time
thereafter, any party, or the receiver or trustee, may file and serve
upon other parties a statement in support of or in opposition to any
action taken or to be taken pursuant to paragraph (c) or (d) of this
section. This statement shall be addressed to the Office of
Proceedings, attention of the Proceedings Clerk. Upon receipt of any
such statement, the Proceedings Clerk shall immediately forward the
statement to the official with responsibility over the case. The notice
and the statements filed by the parties shall be reviewed by that
official who, on or before the effective date of action taken pursuant
to paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) and (d)(1) and (2) of this section, may
take such actions as, in the official's opinion, are necessary to
ensure that the parties to the matter or proceedings are not unduly
prejudiced.
* * * * *
0
21. In Sec. 12.25, revise paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.25 Filing fees.
* * * * *
(b) Fees payable upon filing an answer. (1) If a complainant, in
the complaint, has elected the voluntary decisional procedure, a
respondent who, in the answer, elects the summary decisional procedure
(available only where the amount of damages claimed in the complaint or
as counterclaims does not exceed $30,000) shall, at the time of filing
the answer, pay a filing fee of $75.00.
(2) If a complainant, in the complaint, has elected the voluntary
decisional procedure, a respondent who, in the answer, elects the
formal decisional procedure (available only where the amount of damages
claimed in the complaint or as counterclaims exceeds $30,000) shall, at
the time of filing the answer, pay a filing fee of $200.00.
(c) Fees payable upon filing a reply. In any case in which a
counterclaim has been made, unless a complainant in the complaint, or
the respondent in an answer, has elected the summary decisional
procedure or the formal decisional procedure a complainant, who in the
reply elects either of these procedures, shall, at the time of filing
the reply, pay a filing fee of $75.00 or $200.00, respectively,
depending whether the procedure elected by complainant is pursuant to
subpart D or E of this part.
0
22. Revise Sec. 12.26 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.26 Commencement of a reparation proceeding.
(a) Commencement of voluntary decisional proceeding. Where
complainant and respondent in the complaint and answer have elected the
voluntary decisional procedure pursuant to subpart C of this part and
the complainant has paid the filing fee required by Sec. 12.25, the
Director of the Office of Proceedings shall, if in the Director's
opinion the facts warrant taking such action, forward the pleadings and
all materials of record to the Proceedings Clerk for a proceeding to be
conducted in accordance with subpart C of this part. The Proceedings
Clerk shall forthwith notify the parties of such action. Such
notification shall be accompanied by an order issued by the Proceedings
Clerk requiring the parties to complete all discovery, as provided in
subpart B of this part, within 50 days thereafter. A voluntary
decisional proceeding commences upon service of such notification and
order. As soon as practicable after service of such notification, the
Proceedings Clerk shall assign the case to an Administrative Judge for
a final decision.
(b) Commencement of summary decisional proceeding. Where the amount
claimed as damages, exclusive of interest and costs, in the complaint
or in counterclaim does not exceed $30,000, and either a complainant or
a respondent in the complaint, answer, or reply, has elected the
summary decisional procedure pursuant to subpart D of this part, and
has paid the filing fee required by Sec. 12.25, the Director of the
Office of Proceedings shall, if in the Director's opinion the facts
warrant taking such action, forward the pleadings and all materials of
record to the Proceedings Clerk for a proceeding to be conducted in
accordance with subpart D of this part. The Proceedings Clerk shall
forthwith notify the parties of such action. Such notification shall be
accompanied by an order issued by the Proceedings Clerk requiring the
parties to complete all discovery, as provided in subpart B of this
part, within 50 days thereafter. A summary decisional proceeding
commences upon service of such
[[Page 64355]]
notification. As soon as practicable after service of such
notification, the Proceedings Clerk shall assign the case to an
Administrative Judge for disposition.
(c) Commencement of formal decisional proceeding. Where the amount
claimed as damages in the complaint or as counterclaims exceeds
$30,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and either a complainant or a
respondent in the complaint, answer or reply, has elected the formal
decisional procedure pursuant to subpart E of this part, and has paid
the filing fee required by Sec. 12.25, the Director of the Office of
Proceedings shall, if in the Director's opinion the facts warrant
taking such action, forward the pleadings and the materials of record
to the Proceedings Clerk for a proceeding to be conducted in accordance
with subpart E of this part. The Proceedings Clerk shall forthwith
notify the parties of such action. Such notification shall be
accompanied by an order issued by the Proceedings Clerk requiring the
parties to complete all discovery, as provided in subpart B of this
part, within 50 days thereafter. A formal decisional proceeding
commences upon service of such notification and order. As soon as
practicable after service of such notification, the Proceedings Clerk
shall assign the case to an Administrative Judge. All provisions of
this part that refer to and grant authority to or impose obligations
upon an Administrative Law Judge shall be read as referring to and
granting authority to and imposing obligations upon the Administrative
Judge.
0
23. In Sec. 12.30, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.30 Methods of discovery.
* * * * *
(c) Sanctions for abuse of discovery. If an Administrative Law
Judge or an Administrative Judge finds that any party, without
substantial justification, has necessitated the filing of a motion for
a protective order or for an order compelling discovery, or any other
discovery-related motions, that party shall, if the motion is granted,
be ordered to pay, at the termination of the proceeding, the reasonable
expenses of the moving party incurred in filing the motion, unless the
decisionmaking official finds that circumstances exist which would make
an award of such expenses unjust. If a decisionmaking official finds
that any party, without substantial justification, has filed a motion
for a protective order or for an order compelling discovery, or any
discovery-related motions, that party shall, if the motion is denied,
be ordered to pay, at the termination of the proceeding, the reasonable
expenses of an adverse party incurred in opposing the motion, unless
the decisionmaker finds that circumstances exist which would make an
award of such expenses unjust.
* * * * *
0
24. In Sec. 12.33, revise paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 12.33 Admissions.
* * * * *
(b) Reply. Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be
separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless within twenty (20)
days after service of the request, the party upon whom the request is
directed files and serves upon the party requesting a verified written
answer or objection to the matter. If objection is made, the reasons
therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter
or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot
truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the
substance of the requested admission and when good faith requires that
an answering party qualify the answer and deny only a part of the
matter of which an admission is requested, the answering party shall
specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder.
Answering parties may not give a lack of information or knowledge as a
reason for failure to admit or deny unless they state that they have
made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or reasonably
available to them is insufficient to enable them to admit or deny.
Parties who consider that a matter of which an admission has been
requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground
alone, object to the request; they may deny the matter or set forth
reasons why they cannot admit or deny it.
(c) Determining sufficiency of answers or objections. The party who
has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of
the answers or objections. Unless the objecting party sustains the
burden of showing that the objection is justified, the official
presiding over discovery shall order that an answer be served. If such
official determines that an answer does not comply with the
requirements of this section, that official may order either that the
matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served.
(d) Effect of admission. Any matter admitted under this section is
conclusively established and may be used as proof against the party who
made the admission. However, the discovery or decisionmaking official
may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits
of the proceeding will be served thereby and the party who obtains the
admission fails to satisfy such official that withdrawal or amendments
will prejudice them in maintaining an action or defense on the merits.
0
25. Revise Sec. 12.34 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.34 Discovery by a decisionmaking official.
(a) Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to
all decisional proceedings commenced pursuant to Sec. 12.26. For the
purposes of this section, the term ``decisionmaking official'' shall
mean an Administrative Judge or Administrative Law Judge assigned to
render a decision in the proceeding.
(b) Production of documents and tangible things--(1) Order for
production. A decisionmaking official may, upon the official's own
motion, order a party or non-party to produce copies of specifically
designated documents, papers, books, accounts, or tangible things (or
categories of any of the foregoing) which are in the possession,
custody or control of the party, non-party or agent thereof, against
whom the order is directed. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, a party or nonparty ordered to produce documents or any
of the items under this paragraph (b)(1) shall file and serve the
documents and items listed in the order within twenty (20) days from
the date of service of the order, or within such period of time as the
decisionmaking official may direct. The decisionmaking official may
issue subpoenas to compel the production by parties or non-parties of
such documents and tangible things as are described in this section.
(2) Trade secrets, commercially sensitive or confidential
information. If any party or person against whom an order to produce
has been directed acting in good faith has reason to believe that any
documents or other tangible thing ordered to be produced contains a
trade secret, or commercially sensitive or other confidential
information, the party or person may, in lieu of serving any such
document, in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section, file and
serve a written request for confidential treatment of such documents.
Any such request for confidential treatment shall be accompanied by a
verified statement identifying with particularity the information on
those documents considered to be trade secrets, commercially sensitive
or confidential information, with reasons therefor, and
[[Page 64356]]
indicating which portions, if any, of those documents may be served on
other parties without disclosure of such information. Upon considering
a request for confidential treatment in accordance with this paragraph
(b)(2), the decisionmaking official may, if upon a finding that the
information identified in the request warrants confidential treatment
and is not probative of any material fact in controversy, make copies
of the documents produced, delete such information from the copies, and
serve the copies as modified upon the other parties, with or without an
appropriate protective order limiting dissemination to the parties and
their counsel, if any.
(3) Inability to produce. Any party or person who cannot produce
documents or other tangible things called for in an order for
production, because those documents or things are not in their
possession, custody, or control, shall file and serve within the time
provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section a verified statement
identifying the documents which cannot be produced and setting forth
with particularity the reasons for non-production.
(c) Order for written testimony. The decisionmaking official may,
upon the official's own motion, order a party or non-party witness to
submit verified statements or written responses to interrogatories, or
both, as to all relevant matters within the party's personal knowledge
which are required in response to the order. A party or person ordered
to file affidavits and/or verified written responses to interrogatories
shall file and serve the documents within such period of time as the
decisionmaking official may direct. The official may issue subpoenas to
compel the filing by parties or non-parties of such verified statements
and written responses as are described in this paragraph (c).
0
26. In Sec. 12.35, revise the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 12.35 Consequence of a party's failure to comply with a
discovery order.
If a party fails to comply with an order compelling discovery, or
an order issued pursuant to Sec. 12.34, the official assigned to
render the decision in the case may, upon motion by a party or on the
official's own motion, take such action in regard thereto as is just,
including but not limited to the following:
* * * * *
0
27. In Sec. 12.101, revise the section heading and the introductory
text to read as follows:
Sec. 12.101 Functions and responsibilities of the Administrative
Judge.
The Administrative Judge shall be responsible for the fair and
orderly conduct of the proceeding and shall have the authority:
* * * * *
0
28. Revise Sec. 12.102 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.102 Disqualification of Administrative Judge.
(a) At their own request. An Administrative Judge may withdraw from
a voluntary decisional proceeding when they consider themselves to be
disqualified on the grounds of personal bias, conflict of interest, or
similar bases. In such event the Administrative Judge shall immediately
notify the Commission and each of the parties of the withdrawal and of
the basis for such action.
(b) Upon the request of a party. Any party may request an
Administrative Judge to disqualify themselves on the grounds of
personal bias, conflict of interest, or similar bases. Interlocutory
review of an adverse ruling by the Administrative Judge may be sought
without certification of the matter by the Administrative Judge only in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 12.309.
0
29. In Sec. 12.106, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.106 Final decision and order.
(a) When a final decision is required. After all submissions of
proof have been received, the Administrative Judge shall make the final
decision. Upon its issuance, the final decision shall forthwith be
filed with the Proceedings Clerk, and immediately served on the
parties. The Proceedings Clerk shall also serve a notice, to accompany
the final decision, of the effect of a failure by a party ordered to
pay a reparation award to file the documents required by Sec.
12.407(c).
* * * * *
0
30. Revise Sec. 12.200 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.200 Scope and applicability of this subpart.
The rules set forth in this subpart are applicable only to
proceedings forwarded pursuant to Sec. 12.26(b). The rules in subpart
B of this part permitting discovery are applicable in a summary
decisional proceeding. Unless specifically made applicable, the rules
prescribed in subparts C and E of this part shall not apply to such
proceedings. Parties to a proceeding forwarded pursuant to Sec.
12.26(b) may, by signed agreement filed at any time prior to the
issuance of the initial decision, or of any other order disposing of
all issues in the proceeding, elect to have all of the issues in the
proceeding decided pursuant to the voluntary decisional procedure. Upon
receiving a timely filed stipulation signed by all parties evidencing
such an election, the Administrative Judge shall conduct the proceeding
and render a decision pursuant to subpart C of this part.
0
31. In Sec. 12.201, revise the section heading, the introductory text,
and paragraphs (a) and (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.201 Functions and responsibilities of the Administrative
Judge.
The Administrative Judge shall be responsible for the fair and
orderly conduct of the proceeding and shall have the authority--
(a) In the Administrative Judge's discretion, to conduct pre-
decision conferences in accordance with Sec. 12.206;
* * * * *
(d) To take such action as is appropriate under Sec. 12.35, if a
party fails to comply with an order issued by the Administrative Judge
pursuant to Sec. 12.34;
* * * * *
0
32. Revise Sec. 12.202 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.202 Disqualification of Administrative Judge.
(a) At their own request. An Administrative Judge may withdraw from
a summary decisional proceeding when they consider themselves to be
disqualified on the grounds of personal bias, conflict of interest, or
similar bases. In such event, the Administrative Judge shall
immediately notify the Commission and each of the parties of the
withdrawal and of the basis for such action.
(b) Upon the request of a party. Any party may request an
Administrative Judge to disqualify themselves on the grounds of
personal bias, conflict of interest, or similar bases. Interlocutory
review of an order denying such a request may be sought without
certification of the matter by the Administrative Judge only in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 12.309.
0
33. In Sec. 12.204, revise paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.204 Amended and supplemental pleadings.
(a) Amendments to pleadings. At any time before the parties have
concluded their submission of proof, the Administrative Judge may allow
amendments of the pleadings either upon written consent of the parties,
or for good cause shown, provided
[[Page 64357]]
however, that any pleading as amended shall not contain an allegation
of damages in excess of $30,000. Any party may file a response to a
motion to amend the pleadings within ten (10) days after the date of
service upon that party of the motion.
(b) Supplemental pleadings. At any time before the parties have
concluded their submissions of proof, and upon such terms as are just,
the Administrative Judge may, upon motion by a party, permit a party to
serve a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions, occurrences
or events which have happened since the date of the pleadings sought to
be supplemented and which are relevant to any of the issues in the
proceeding: Provided however, that any pleading as supplemented may not
contain an allegation of damages in excess of $30,000. Any party may
file a response to a motion to supplement the pleadings within ten (10)
days after the date of service upon that party of the motion.
* * * * *
0
34. In Sec. 12.205, revise paragraphs (a) and (b), republish the
paragraph (c) heading, and revise paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 12.205 Motions.
(a) In general. Motions for relief not otherwise specifically
provided for in this subpart (Sec. Sec. 12.200 through 12.210), other
than discovery-related motions and motions for extensions of time and
similar procedural orders, shall not be allowed. Except as otherwise
specifically provided in this subpart, all motions permitted under the
provisions of this subpart shall be directed to the Administrative
Judge prior to the filing of the initial decision, and to the
Commission after the initial decision has been filed. Motions for
extensions of time and similar procedural orders may be acted upon at
any time, without awaiting a response thereto. Any party adversely
affected by such action may request reconsideration, vacation or
modification of such action.
(b) Answer to motions. Any party may serve and file a written
response to a motion within ten (10) days after service of the motion,
or within such longer or shorter period as is established by the
provisions of this part, or as the Administrative Judge or the
Commission may direct.
(c) Dismissal--(1) By the Administrative Judge. An Administrative
Judge, acting upon their own motion, may:
(i) Dismiss the entire proceeding without prejudice to
counterclaims, if the Administrative Judge finds that the matters
alleged in the complaint fail to state a claim cognizable in
reparations; or
(ii) Order dismissal of any claim, counterclaim, or party from the
proceeding if the Administrative Judge finds, after review of the
record, that such claim or counterclaim (by itself or as applied to any
party) is not cognizable in reparations.
(2) Motion for dismissal by a party. Any party who believes that
grounds exist for dismissal of the entire complaint, or of any claim
therein, or of any counterclaim or party from the proceeding, may file
a motion for dismissal specifying the claims or parties to be dismissed
and the reasons therefor. Upon consideration of the whole record, the
Administrative Judge may grant or deny such motion, in whole or in
part.
* * * * *
0
35. Amend Sec. 12.206 as follows:
0
a. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through (g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through
(7);
0
b. Designate the introductory text as paragraph (a) introductory text;
0
c. Revise newly designated paragraph (a) introductory text;
0
d. Designate the undesignated paragraph following newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(7) as paragraph (b); and
0
e. Revise newly designated paragraph (b).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 12.206 Pre-decision conferences.
(a) At any time after a summary decisional proceeding has been
commenced pursuant to Sec. 12.26(b), the Administrative Judge may, in
their discretion, conduct one or more pre-decision conferences to be
held in Washington, DC, or by telephone, with all parties, for the
purposes of:
* * * * *
(b) At or following the conclusion of such a conference, the
Administrative Judge may serve a pre-decision memorandum and order
setting forth the agreements, if any, reached by the parties, any
procedural determinations made by the Administrative Judge, and the
issues for resolution not disposed of by the admissions or agreements
by the parties. Such order, when issued, shall control the subsequent
course of the proceeding unless modified to prevent injustice.
0
36. In Sec. 12.207, revise paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) to read
as follows:
Sec. 12.207 Summary disposition.
(a) Filing of motions, answers. Any parties who believe that there
is no genuine issue of material fact to be determined and that they are
entitled to a decision as a matter of law concerning all issues of
liability in the proceeding may file a motion for summary disposition
at any time until the parties have concluded their submissions of
proof. Any adverse party, within ten (10) days after service of the
motion, may file and serve opposing papers or may countermove for
summary disposition.
(b) Supporting papers. A motion for summary disposition shall
include a statement of the material facts as to which the moving party
contends there is no genuine issue, supported by the pleadings, and by
affidavits, other verified statements, admissions, stipulations, and
interrogatories. The motion may also be supported by briefs containing
points and authorities in support of the contention of the party making
the motion. When a motion is made and supported as provided in this
section, unless otherwise ordered by the Administrative Judge, adverse
parties may not rest upon the mere allegations, but shall serve and
file in response a statement setting forth those material facts as to
which they contend a genuine issue exists, supported by affidavits and
other verified material. They may also submit a brief of points and
authorities.
(c) Summary disposition upon motion of the Administrative Judge. If
the Administrative Judge believes that there may be no genuine issue of
material fact to be determined and that one of the parties may be
entitled to a decision as a matter of law, the Administrative Judge may
direct the parties to submit papers in support of and in opposition to
summary disposition, substantially as provided in paragraphs (a) and
(b) of this section.
(d) Ruling on summary disposition. The Administrative Judge may
grant summary disposition if the undisputed pleaded facts, affidavits,
other verified statements, admissions, stipulations, and matters of
official notice show that:
(1) There is no genuine issue as to any material fact;
(2) There is no necessity that further facts be developed in the
record; and
(3) A party is entitled to a decision in that party's favor as a
matter of law.
* * * * *
0
37. In Sec. 12.208, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.208 Submissions of proof.
* * * * *
(b) Oral testimony and examination. The Administrative Judge may
order an oral hearing for the presentation of testimony and examination
of the parties and their witnesses when appropriate and necessary for
the
[[Page 64358]]
resolution of factual issues, upon motion by either a party or the
Administrative Judge. An oral hearing held under this section will be
convened by conference telephone call as provided in Sec. 12.209(b),
except that an in-person hearing may be held in Washington, DC, under
the circumstances set forth in Sec. 12.209(c).
0
38. Revise Sec. 12.209 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.209 Oral testimony.
(a) Generally. When the Administrative Judge determines that an
oral hearing is necessary and appropriate, such oral hearing will be
held either by telephone or in person in Washington, DC, as set forth
in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section. The Administrative
Judge, in their discretion with consideration for the convenience of
the parties and their witnesses, will determine the time and date of
such hearing. During an oral hearing, in their discretion, the
Administrative Judge may regulate appropriately the course and sequence
of testimony and examination of the parties and their witnesses and
limit the issues.
(b) Telephonic hearings. When an Administrative Judge has
determined to hold an oral hearing by telephone, an order to that
effect will be issued at least 15 days prior to the hearing notifying
the parties of the date and time of the hearing. The order will direct
the parties to confirm, at least 48 hours in advance of the hearing,
that the correct telephone numbers for the parties and their witnesses
are on file with the Office of Proceedings, and warn that failure to
provide correct telephone numbers may be deemed waiver of that party's
right to participate in the hearing, to present evidence, or to cross-
examine other witnesses. If a party is unavailable by telephone at the
appointed time, any other party in attendance may present testimony,
and the Administrative Judge also may impose any appropriate sanction
listed in Sec. 12.35. All telephonic hearings will be recorded
electronically but will be transcribed only upon direction of the
Administrative Judge (if necessary) or in the event of Commission
review. The parties may secure a copy of the recording of the hearing
from the Proceedings Clerk upon written request and payment of the cost
of the recording.
(c) Washington, DC, hearings. In exceptional circumstances and when
an in-person hearing is determined to be necessary in resolving the
issues, the Administrative Judge may order an in-person hearing in
Washington, DC, upon written request by a party and the agreement of at
least one opposing party. The Administrative Judge will issue notice of
the time, date, and location of an in-person hearing to the parties at
least 30 days in advance of the hearing. Except as otherwise provided
in this section, an in-person hearing will be held and recorded in the
manner prescribed in Sec. 12.312(c) through (f). A party not agreeing
to appear at the hearing in Washington, DC, may be ordered to
participate by telephone. Any party not appearing in person or by
telephone will be deemed to have waived the right to participate in the
hearing, to present evidence, or to cross-examine other witnesses;
further, that party may be subject to such action under Sec. 12.35 as
the Administrative Judge may find appropriate. The Administrative Judge
may order any party who requests or agrees to appear at a hearing in
Washington, DC, and fails to appear without good cause, to pay any
reasonable costs unnecessarily incurred by parties appearing at such a
hearing.
(d) Compulsory process. An application for a subpoena requiring a
non-party to participate in a telephonic hearing or to appear at an in-
person hearing in Washington, DC, may be made in writing to the
Administrative Judge without notice to the other parties. The standards
for issuance or denial of an application for a subpoena, the service
and travel fee requirements, and the method for enforcing such
subpoenas are set forth at Sec. 12.313.
0
39. In Sec. 12.210, revise paragraphs (a), (b) introductory text,
(b)(1), and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.210 Initial decision.
(a) In general. Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law
briefs shall not be allowed. As soon as practicable after all
submissions of proof have been received, the Administrative Judge shall
make the initial decision, which will be filed forthwith with the
Proceedings Clerk. Upon filing of an initial decision, the Proceedings
Clerk shall immediately serve upon the parties a copy of the initial
decision and a notification of the effect of a party's failure timely
to appeal the initial decision to the Commission, as provided in
paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, as well as the effect of a
failure by a party who has been ordered to pay a reparation award
timely to file the documents required by Sec. 12.407(c).
(b) Content of initial decision. In the initial decision in a
summary decisional proceeding, the Administrative Judge shall:
(1) Include a brief statement of the findings as to the facts, with
reference to those portions of the record which support those findings;
* * * * *
(c) Costs; prejudgment interest. The Administrative Judge may, in
the initial decision, award costs (including the costs of instituting
the proceeding, and if appropriate, reasonable attorneys' fees) and, if
warranted as a matter of law under the circumstances of the particular
case, prejudgment interest to the party in whose favor a judgment is
entered.
* * * * *
0
40. Amend Sec. 12.303 as follows:
0
a. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through (g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through
(7);
0
b. Designate the introductory text as paragraph (a) introductory text;
0
c. Revise newly designated paragraph (a) introductory text;
0
d. Designate the undesignated paragraph following newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(7) as paragraph (b); and
0
e. Revise newly designated paragraph (b).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 12.303 Pre-decision conferences.
(a) During the time period permitted for discovery pursuant to
Sec. 12.30(d), and thereafter, Administrative Law Judges may, in their
discretion, conduct one or more pre-decision conferences to be held in
Washington, DC, or by telephone, with all parties for the purposes of:
* * * * *
(b) At or following the conclusion of a pre-decision conference,
Administrative Law Judges may serve a pre-decision memorandum and order
setting forth the agreements reached by the parties, any procedural
determinations made by them, and the issues for resolution not disposed
of by admissions or agreements by the parties. Such an order shall
control the subsequent course of the proceeding unless modified to
prevent injustice.
0
41. In Sec. 12.304, revise the introductory text and paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
Sec. 12.304 Functions and responsibilities of the Administrative Law
Judge.
Once an Administrative Law Judge has been assigned the case, the
Administrative Law Judge shall be responsible for the fair and orderly
conduct of a formal decisional proceeding and shall have the authority:
* * * * *
(e) In the Administrative Law Judge's discretion, to conduct pre-
decision conferences, for the purposes prescribed in Sec. 12.303, at
any time after a
[[Page 64359]]
proceeding has commenced pursuant to Sec. 12.26(c);
* * * * *
0
42. Revise Sec. 12.305 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.305 Disqualification of Administrative Law Judge.
(a) At their own request. An Administrative Law Judge may withdraw
from a formal decisional proceeding when they consider themselves to be
disqualified on the grounds of personal bias, conflict of interest, or
similar bases. In such event, they shall immediately notify the
Commission and each of the parties of the withdrawal and of the basis
for such action.
(b) Upon the request of a party. Any party may request an
Administrative Law Judge to disqualify themselves on the grounds of
personal bias, conflict of interest, or similar bases. Interlocutory
review of an order denying such a request may be sought without
certification of the matter by an Administrative Law Judge, only in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 12.309.
0
43. In Sec. 12.307, revise paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.307 Amended and supplemental pleadings.
(a) Amendments to pleadings. At any time before the parties have
concluded their submissions of proof, the Administrative Law Judge may
allow amendments of the pleadings either upon written consent of the
parties or for good cause shown. Any party may file a response to a
motion to amend the pleadings within ten (10) days after the date of
service upon that party of the motion.
(b) Supplemental pleadings. At any time before the parties have
concluded their submissions of proof, and upon such terms as are just,
an Administrative Law Judge may, upon motion by a party, permit a party
to serve a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions,
occurrences or events which have happened since the date of the
pleadings sought to be supplemented and which are relevant to the
issues in the proceeding. Any party may file a response to a motion to
supplement the pleadings within ten (10) days after the date of service
upon that party of the motion.
* * * * *
0
44. In Sec. 12.308, revise paragraph (b), republish paragraph (c)
heading, and revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.308 Motions.
* * * * *
(b) Answer to motions. Any party may serve and file a written
response to a motion within ten (10) days after service of the motion
upon that party, or within such longer or shorter period as established
by this part, or as the Administrative Law Judge or the Commission may
direct.
(c) Dismissal--(1) By the Administrative Law Judge. The
Administrative Law Judge, acting on their own motion, may, at any time
after they have been assigned the case:
(i) Dismiss the entire proceeding, without prejudice to
counterclaims, if they find that none of the matters alleged in the
complaint state a claim that is cognizable in reparations; or
(ii) Order dismissal of any claim, counterclaim, or party from the
proceeding if they find that such claim or counterclaim (by itself, or
as applied to a party) is not cognizable in reparations.
* * * * *
0
45. In Sec. 12.309, revise paragraphs (a)(1), (d), and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 12.309 Interlocutory review by the Commission.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) The appeal is from a ruling pursuant to Sec. 12.102, Sec.
12.202, or Sec. 12.305 refusing to grant a motion to disqualify an
Administrative Judge or Administrative Law Judge;
* * * * *
(d) Proceedings not stayed. The filing of an application for
interlocutory review and a grant of review shall not stay proceedings
before an Administrative Law Judge (or an Administrative Judge, if
applicable) unless that official or the Commission shall so order. The
Commission will not consider a motion for a stay unless the motion
shall have first been made to the Administrative Law Judge (or, if
applicable, the Administrative Judge) and denied.
(e) Interlocutory review by the Commission on its own motion.
Nothing in this section should be construed as restricting the
Commission from acting on its own motion to review on an interlocutory
basis any ruling of an Administrative Law Judge, Proceedings Officer or
an Administrative Judge in any proceeding commenced pursuant to Sec.
12.26.
0
46. In Sec. 12.310, revise paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 12.310 Summary disposition.
(a) Filing of motions, answers. Any parties who believe that there
is no genuine issue of material fact to be determined and that they are
entitled to a decision as a matter of law concerning all issues of
liability in the proceeding may file a motion for summary disposition
at any time before a determination is made by the Administrative Law
Judge to order an oral hearing in the proceeding. Any adverse party,
within ten (10) days after service of the motion, may file and serve
opposing papers or may countermove for summary disposition.
(b) Supporting papers. A motion for summary disposition shall
include a statement of all material facts as to which the moving party
contends that there is no genuine issue, supported by the pleadings,
and by affidavits, other verified statements, admissions, stipulations,
and interrogatories. The motion may also be supported by briefs
containing points and authorities in support of the contention of the
party making the motion. When a motion is made and supported as
provided in this section, unless otherwise ordered by the
Administrative Law Judge, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere
allegations, but shall serve and file in response a statement setting
forth those material facts as to which the adverse party contends a
genuine issue exists, supported by affidavits and other verified
material. The adverse party may also submit a brief of points and
authorities.
* * * * *
(d) Summary disposition upon motion of the Administrative Law
Judge. If the Administrative Law Judge believes that there may be no
genuine issue of material fact to be determined and that one of the
parties may be entitled to a decision as a matter of law, the
Administrative Law Judge may direct the parties to submit papers in
support of and in opposition to summary disposition, and may hear oral
argument, substantially as provided in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of
this section.
* * * * *
0
47. Revise Sec. 12.311 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.311 Disposing of proceeding or issues without oral hearing.
If the Administrative Law Judge determines that the documentary
proof and other tangible forms of proof submitted by the parties are
sufficient to permit resolution of some or all of the factual issues in
the proceeding without the need for oral testimony, the Administrative
Law Judge may order that all proof relating to such issues be submitted
in documentary and tangible form, and dispose of such issues without an
oral hearing. In such an
[[Page 64360]]
event, proof in support of the complaint, answer, and reply, may be
found in those verified documents, in depositions on written
interrogatories, in admissible documents obtained through discovery, in
other verified statements of fact, documents, and tangible evidence.
0
48. In Sec. 12.312, revise paragraphs (b) introductory text, (b)(2),
(d)(1), (2), and (4), and (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.312 Oral hearing.
* * * * *
(b) Location of hearing. Unless the Director of the Office of
Proceedings for reasons of administrative economy or practical
necessity determines otherwise, and except as provided in this
paragraph (b), the location of an oral hearing shall be in one of the
following cities: Albuquerque, N.M.; Atlanta, Ga.; Boston, Mass.;
Chicago, Ill.; Cincinnati, Ohio; Columbia, S.C.; Denver, Colo.;
Houston, Tex.; Kansas City, Mo.; Los Angeles, Cal.; Minneapolis, Minn.;
New Orleans, La.; New York, N.Y.; Oklahoma City, Okla.; Phoenix, Ariz.;
San Diego, Cal.; San Francisco, Cal.; Seattle, Wash.; St. Petersburg,
Fla.; and Washington, DC. The Administrative Law Judge may, in any case
where a party avers, in an affidavit, that none of the foregoing cities
is located within 300 miles of the party's principal residence, waive
this paragraph (b) and, upon giving due regard for the convenience of
all of the parties, order that the hearing be held in a more convenient
locale.
* * * * *
(2) Effect of failure to appear. If any party to the proceeding
fails to appear at the hearing, or at any part thereof, the non-
appearing party shall to that extent be deemed to have waived the
opportunity for an oral hearing in the proceeding. The Administrative
Law Judge, for just cause, may take such action as is appropriate
pursuant to Sec. 12.35 against a party who fails to appear at the
hearing. In the event that a party appears at the hearing and no party
appears for the opposing side, the party who is present may present
evidence, in whole or in part, in the form of affidavits or by oral
testimony, before the Administrative Law Judge.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Conduct direct and cross-examination of parties and witnesses.
All witnesses at a hearing for the purpose of taking evidence shall
testify under oath or affirmation, which shall be administered by the
Administrative Law Judge. Unless otherwise ordered by the
Administrative Law Judge, parties shall be entitled to present oral
direct testimony and other documentary proof, and to conduct direct
examination and cross examine adverse parties and witnesses. To
expedite the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge may, in their
discretion, order that the direct testimony of the parties and their
witnesses be presented in documentary form, by affidavit,
interrogatory, and other documents. In any event, the Administrative
Law Judge, in their discretion, may permit cross examination, without
regard to the scope of direct testimony, as to any matter which is
relevant to the issues in the proceeding;
(2) Introduce exhibits. The original of each exhibit introduced in
evidence or marked for identification shall be filed unless the
Administrative Law Judge permits the substitution of copies for the
original documents. A copy of each exhibit introduced by a party or
marked for identification shall be supplied by the introducing party to
the Administrative Law Judge and to each other party to the proceeding.
Exhibits shall be maintained by the reporter who shall serve as
custodian of the exhibits until they are transmitted to the Proceedings
Clerk pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section;
* * * * *
(4) Make offers of proof. When an objection to a question
propounded to a witness is sustained, examiners may make a specific
offer of what they expect to prove by the answer of the witness.
Rejected exhibits, adequately marked for identification, shall be
retained in the record so as to be available for consideration by any
reviewing authority.
* * * * *
(g) Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law; briefs. An
Administrative Law Judge, upon their own motion or upon motion of a
party, may permit the filing of post-hearing proposed findings of fact
and conclusions of law. Absent an order permitting such findings and
conclusions, none shall be allowed. Unless otherwise ordered by the
Administrative Law Judge and for good cause shown, the proposed
findings and conclusions (including briefs in support thereof), shall
not exceed twenty-five (25) pages and shall be filed not later than
forty-five (45) days after the close of the oral hearing.
0
49. In Sec. 12.313, revise paragraphs (a)(2) and (b)(3), republish
paragraph (c) heading, and revise paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) and
(c)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 12.313 Subpoenas for attendance at an oral hearing.
(a) * * *
(2) Standards for issuance or denial of subpoenas. The
Administrative Law Judge considering any application for a subpoena
shall issue the subpoena if they are satisfied the application complies
with this section and the request is not unreasonable, oppressive,
excessive in scope or unduly burdensome. In the event they determine
that a requested subpoena or any of its terms is unreasonable,
oppressive, excessive in scope, or unduly burdensome, the
Administrative Law Judge may refuse to issue the subpoena, or may issue
it only upon such conditions as they determine fairness requires.
(b) * * *
(3) Rulings. The motion shall be decided by the Administrative Law
Judge and the order shall provide such terms and conditions for the
production of the material, the disclosure of the information, or the
appearance of the witnesses as may appear necessary and appropriate for
the protection of the public interest.
(c) Service of subpoenas--(1) How effected. Service of a subpoena
upon a party shall be made in accordance with Sec. 12.10. Service of a
subpoena upon any other person shall be made by delivering a copy of
the subpoena to them as provided in paragraph (c)(2) or (3) of this
section, and by tendering to them the fees for one day's attendance and
the mileage as specified in paragraph (e) of this section. When the
subpoena is issued at the instance of any officer or agency of the
United States, fees and mileage need not be tendered at the time of
service.
(2) Service upon a natural person. Delivery of a copy of a subpoena
and tender of fees and mileage to a natural person may be effected by:
(i) Handing them to the person;
(ii) Leaving them at the person's office with the person in charge
thereof or, if there is no one in charge, by leaving the subpoena in a
conspicuous place therein;
(iii) Leaving them at the person's dwelling place or usual place of
abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing
therein;
(iv) Mailing them by registered or certified mail to them at their
last known address; or
(v) Any other method whereby actual notice is given to the person
and the fees and mileage are timely made available.
(3) * * *
[[Page 64361]]
(ii) Mailing them by registered or certified mail to any such
representative at the person's last known address; or
* * * * *
0
50. In Sec. 12.314, revise paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 12.314 Initial decision.
(a) In general. The Administrative Law Judge as soon as practicable
after the parties have completed their submissions of proof, or after
the conclusion of an oral hearing if one is held, shall render the
initial decision, which shall forthwith be filed with the Proceedings
Clerk, and a copy of which shall be served immediately by the
Proceedings Clerk upon each of the parties. The Proceedings Clerk shall
also serve a notice, to accompany the initial decision, of the effect
of a party's failure timely to appeal to the Commission the initial
decision, as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, and
the effect of a failure of a party who has been ordered to pay a
reparation award timely to file the documents required by Sec.
12.407(c).
(b) * * *
(1) Include a brief statement of findings as to the facts, with
references to those portions of the record which support those
findings;
* * * * *
0
51. Revise Sec. 12.402 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.402 Appeal of disposition of less than all claims or parties
in a proceeding.
(a) In general. Where two or more different claims for relief are
presented, or where multiple parties are involved, in a proceeding
forwarded pursuant to Sec. 12.26(b) or (c), the Administrative Judge
or Administrative Law Judge, may upon the Judge's own motion or by
motion of a party, direct that an initial decision or other order
disposing of one or more, but fewer than all of the claims or parties,
shall be final and immediately appealable to the Commission. Such a
direction may be made only upon an express determination that there is
no just reason for delay. When such a direction is made, a party may
appeal the initial decision or order in accordance with the procedure
prescribed by Sec. 12.401.
(b) When decision is not appealable. In the absence of such a
direction by the Administrative Judge or an Administrative Law Judge,
an initial decision or order disposing of fewer than all of the claims
or all of the parties shall be subject to revision by the decisionmaker
at any time before a disposition is made of all remaining claims or
parties, and no appeal may be taken to the Commission pursuant to this
section.
0
52. Revise Sec. 12.405 to read as follows:
Sec. 12.405 Leave to adduce additional evidence.
Any time prior to issuance of its final decision pursuant to Sec.
12.406, the Commission may, after notice to the parties and an
opportunity for them to present their views, reopen the hearing to
receive further evidence. The application shall show to the
satisfaction of the Commission that the additional evidence is
material, and that there were reasonable grounds for failure to adduce
such evidence at the hearing. The Commission may receive the additional
evidence or may remand the proceeding to the Administrative Judge or
Administrative Law Judge to receive the additional evidence.
0
53. In Sec. 12.407, revise paragraphs (c) introductory text and (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 12.407 Satisfaction of reparation award; enforcement;
sanctions.
* * * * *
(c) Automatic suspension. A person required to pay a reparation
award shall be prohibited from trading on all contract markets and if
such person is registered, the registration shall be suspended
automatically, without further notice, unless such person shall, within
fifteen (15) days after the time limit for satisfaction of an award (as
prescribed in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section) expires, file with
the Proceedings Clerk and serve on the other parties:
* * * * *
(d) Reinstatement. The sanctions imposed in accordance with
paragraph (c) of this section shall remain in effect until the person
required to pay the reparation award demonstrates to the satisfaction
of the Commission that the amount required has been paid in full
including prejudgment interest if awarded and post-judgment interest at
the prevailing rate computed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1961 from the
date directed in the final order to the date of payment, compounded
annually. In the event an award of post-judgment interest is
inadvertently omitted, such interest nevertheless shall run as
calculated in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1961 and the rules in this
part.
* * * * *
0
54. In Sec. 12.408, revise the introductory text and paragraphs (a)(2)
introductory text, (a)(2)(ii) and (iii), (a)(3), (4), and (6), and (b)
to read as follows:
Sec. 12.408 Delegation of authority to the General Counsel.
Pursuant to the authority granted under section 2(a)(4) and
2(a)(11) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 4a(c) and
4a(j), the Commission hereby delegates, until such time as it orders
otherwise, the following functions to the General Counsel, to be
performed by them, or such person or persons under their direction as
they may designate from time to time:
(a) * * *
(2) Remand, with or without specific instructions, initial
decisions or other orders disposing of the entire proceeding to the
appropriate officer (Director of the Office of Proceedings,
Administrative Judge, or Administrative Law Judge) in the following
situations--
* * * * *
(ii) Where, in their judgment, clarification or supplementation of
an initial decision or other order disposing of the entire proceeding
prior to Commission review is appropriate; and
(iii) Where, in their judgment, a ministerial act necessary to the
proper conduct of the proceeding has not been performed;
(3) Deny applications for interlocutory review by the Commission of
a ruling of an Administrative Judge or Administrative Law Judge in
cases in which the Administrative Judge or Administrative Law Judge has
not certified the ruling to the Commission in the manner prescribed by
Sec. 12.309, and the ruling does not concern the disqualification of,
or a motion to disqualify, an Administrative Judge or Administrative
Law Judge, or the suspension of, or failure to suspend, an attorney
from participating in reparation proceedings;
(4) Dismiss any appeal from an initial decision or other
disposition of the entire proceeding by an Administrative Law Judge (or
Administrative Judge), in a proceeding where such appeal is not filed
or perfected in accordance with Sec. 12.401, and deny any application
for interlocutory review if it is not filed in accordance with Sec.
12.309;
* * * * *
(6) Enter any order that, in their judgment, will facilitate or
expedite Commission review of an initial decision or other order
disposing of the entire proceeding.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this
section, in any case in which the General Counsel believes it
appropriate, the General Counsel or their designee may submit the
matter to the Commission for its consideration.
* * * * *
[[Page 64362]]
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3, 2021, by the
Commission.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
Note: The following appendix will not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Appendix to Changing Position Title of Judgment Officer to
Administrative Judge--Commission Voting Summary
On this matter, Acting Chairman Behnam and Commissioners Stump
and Berkovitz voted in the affirmative.* No Commissioner voted in
the negative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Commissioner Berkovitz submitted his written vote on this
matter prior to departing the Commission on October 15, 2021.
[FR Doc. 2021-24449 Filed 11-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P