Air Plan Approval; California; San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; Stationary Source Permits, 64071-64073 [2021-25045]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
family members are eligible, without
undue fear or confusion. The
Department welcomes comments on the
potential effects of the IFR on public
health measures in response to the
pandemic, as well as other ways that the
Department should consider the
intervening circumstances of the
COVID–19 pandemic in relation to the
IFR.
Consequently, the Department has
concluded that it should review the IFR
to determine (1) if the IFR should be
rescinded or revised, and (2) what final
rule should be adopted, if any. If the IFR
is rescinded, § 40.41 would logically
revert to its prior text pending any new
rulemaking; such an outcome would
likely be preferable to a regulatory void,
which the Department did not propose
in the 2019 IFR. See 22 CFR 40.41
(2018).5
IV. Request for Public Comment
The Department invites comment on
any issues that may be pertinent to its
review of the IFR to determine (1) if the
IFR should be rescinded or revised, and
(2) what final rule should be adopted, if
any. Reopening the comment period
gives interested persons an opportunity
to comment on these issues.
Kevin E. Bryant,
Deputy Director, Office of Directives
Management, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021–25038 Filed 11–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0854]
Safety Zone; Military Ocean Terminal
Concord Safety Zone, Suisun Bay,
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zone in the navigable waters
of Suisun Bay, off Concord, CA, in
support of explosive off and on-loading
to Military Ocean Terminal Concord
(MOTCO). This safety zone is necessary
to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from potential
explosion within the explosive arc. The
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
5 Prior text of § 40.41 available at https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2018-title22vol1/pdf/CFR-2018-title22-vol1-chapIsubchapE.pdf, page 8.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Nov 16, 2021
Jkt 256001
safety zone is open to all persons and
vessels for transitory use, but vessel
operators desiring to anchor or
otherwise loiter within the safety zone
must obtain the permission of the
Captain of the Port San Francisco or a
designated representative. All persons
and vessels operating within the safety
zone must comply with all directions
given to them by the Captain of the Port
San Francisco or a designated
representative.
The regulations in 33 CFR
165.1198 will be enforced from
November 15, 2021, from 12:01 a.m.
until November 19, 2021, at 11:59 p.m.,
or as announced via marine information
broadcasts.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or
email LTJG William Harris, Sector San
Francisco Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 415–399–7443,
email SFWaterways@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Coast
Guard will enforce the safety zone in 33
CFR 165.1198 for the Military Ocean
Terminal Concord regulated area from
November 15, 2021, from 12:01 a.m.,
until November 19, 2021, at 11:59 p.m.
This safety zone is necessary to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential explosion
within the explosive arc. Our regulation
for this safety zone, § 165.1198, specifies
the location of the safety zone which
encompasses the navigable waters in the
area between 500 yards of MOTCO Pier
2 in position 38°03′30″ N, 122°01′14″ W
and 3,000 yards of the pier. During the
enforcement periods, as reflected in
§ 165.1198(d), if you are the operator of
a vessel in the regulated area you must
comply with the instructions of the
COTP or the designated on-scene patrol
personnel. Vessel operators desiring to
anchor or otherwise loiter within the
safety zone must contact Sector San
Francisco Vessel Traffic Service at 415–
556–2760 or VHF Channel 14 to obtain
permission.
In addition to this notification of
enforcement in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard plans to provide
notification of this enforcement period
via the Local Notice to Mariners, and
marine information broadcasts.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 10, 2021.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2021–25182 Filed 11–15–21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64071
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0238; FRL–8896–02–
R9]
Air Plan Approval; California; San
Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control
District; Stationary Source Permits
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District
(SJVAPCD or ‘‘the District’’) portion of
the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the
District’s New Source Review
permitting program for new and
modified sources of air pollution under
section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA); specifically our approval of Rule
2021: Experimental Research
Operations. We are finalizing our
proposed approval of Rule 2021 as part
of the District’s program to regulate the
modification and construction of
stationary sources within the areas
covered by the SIP as necessary to
assure attainment and maintenance of
the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
SUMMARY:
This rule will be effective on
December 17, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket No.
EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0238. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, Air-3–
1, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
64072
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
94105, (415) 972–3534,
yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On February 22, 2021, the EPA
proposed to approve the following rule
I. Proposed Action
into the California SIP. 86 FR 10522.
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
final action with the dates that it was
adopted by the local air agency and
submitted to the EPA by the California
Air Resources Board.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency
Rule No.
SJVAPCD .........
Rule title
2021
Experimental Research Operations .............................................................
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one nongermane comment. Therefore, we are
finalizing our action as proposed.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
changed our assessment of the rule as
described in our proposed action. We
continue to find that SJVAPCD Rule
2021 fulfills all relevant CAA
requirements. Therefore, as authorized
in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA
is fully approving the rule into the
California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the rule
listed in Table 1 of this preamble. The
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, this document available through
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Nov 16, 2021
Amended
Jkt 256001
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12/17/92
Submitted on
11/18/93
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by January 18, 2022.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
requirements, and Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 10, 2021.
Elizabeth Adams,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(194)(i)(C)(6) to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(194) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(6) Rule 2021, ‘‘Experimental
Research Operations,’’ amended on
December 17, 1992.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–25045 Filed 11–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0707; FRL–9059–02–
R4]
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina:
Mecklenburg Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to
the Mecklenburg County portion of the
North Carolina SIP, hereinafter referred
to as the Mecklenburg Local
Implementation Plan (LIP). The revision
was submitted by the State of North
Carolina, through the North Carolina
Division Air Quality (NCDAQ), on
behalf of Mecklenburg County Air
Quality via a letter dated April 24, 2020,
and was received by EPA on June 19,
2020. The revision updates several
Mecklenburg County Air Pollution
Control Ordinance (MCAPCO) ambient
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Nov 16, 2021
Jkt 256001
air quality rules incorporated into the
LIP and adds one new rule for fine
particulate matter (PM2.5). EPA is
approving these changes pursuant to the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This rule is effective December
17, 2021.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2020–0707. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air and Radiation Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pearlene Williams, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
9144. Ms. Williams can also be reached
via electronic mail at
williams.pearlene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Mecklenburg County LIP was
originally submitted to EPA on June 14,
1990, and EPA approved the plan on
May 2, 1991. See 56 FR 20140.
Mecklenburg County prepared three
submittals in order to modify the LIP
for, among other things, general
consistency with the North Carolina
SIP.1 The three submittals were
submitted to EPA as follows: NCDAQ
transmitted the October 25, 2017,
1 The Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
revision that is dated April 24, 2020, and received
by EPA on June 19, 2020, is comprised of three
previous submittals—one dated January 21, 2016;
one dated October 25, 2017; and one dated January
14, 2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64073
submittal to EPA but withdrew it from
review through a letter dated February
15, 2019. On April 24, 2020, NCDAQ
resubmitted the October 25, 2017,
update to EPA and also submitted the
January 21, 2016, and January 14, 2019,
updates. Due to an inconsistency with
public notice at the local level, these
submittals were withdrawn from EPA
through a letter dated February 15,
2019. Mecklenburg County corrected
this error, and NCDAQ submitted the
updates in a revision dated April 24,
2020.2
On September 24, 2021, EPA
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to
approve the April 24, 2020, SIP revision
regarding updates to Mecklenburg’s
ambient air quality standard rules, as
well as the addition of a PM2.5 rule. The
NPRM provides additional detail
regarding the background and rationale
for EPA’s action. Comments on the
NPRM were due on or before October
25, 2021. EPA received no comments on
the September 24, NPRM.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
by reference of Mecklenburg County
Pollution Control Ordinance Rules
2.0401—Purpose; 2.0402—Sulfur
Oxides; 2.0404—Carbon Monoxide;
2.0405—Ozone; 2.0407—Nitrogen
Dioxide; 2.0408—Lead; and 2.0410—
PM2.5 Particulate Matter, all which have
an effective date of December 18, 2018;
as well as Rule 2.0403—Total
Suspended Particulates, with an
effective date of December 15, 2015.
EPA has made and will continue to
make these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking
of EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.3
2 EPA notes that the April 24, 2020, submittal was
received by EPA on June 19, 2020.
3 See 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64071-64073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25045]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0238; FRL-8896-02-R9]
Air Plan Approval; California; San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District; Stationary Source Permits
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District (SJVAPCD or ``the District'') portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the
District's New Source Review permitting program for new and modified
sources of air pollution under section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air
Act (CAA); specifically our approval of Rule 2021: Experimental
Research Operations. We are finalizing our proposed approval of Rule
2021 as part of the District's program to regulate the modification and
construction of stationary sources within the areas covered by the SIP
as necessary to assure attainment and maintenance of the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards.
DATES: This rule will be effective on December 17, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0238. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, Air-3-
1, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
[[Page 64072]]
94105, (415) 972-3534, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On February 22, 2021, the EPA proposed to approve the following
rule into the California SIP. 86 FR 10522. Table 1 lists the rule
addressed by this final action with the dates that it was adopted by
the local air agency and submitted to the EPA by the California Air
Resources Board.
Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted on
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVAPCD........................... 2021 Experimental Research 12/17/92 11/18/93
Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our proposed action contains more information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one non-germane comment. Therefore, we
are finalizing our action as proposed.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that changed our assessment of the rule
as described in our proposed action. We continue to find that SJVAPCD
Rule 2021 fulfills all relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving
the rule into the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the rule
listed in Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, this document available through https://www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 18, 2022. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
[[Page 64073]]
requirements, and Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 10, 2021.
Elizabeth Adams,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(194)(i)(C)(6) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(194) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(6) Rule 2021, ``Experimental Research Operations,'' amended on
December 17, 1992.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-25045 Filed 11-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P